Paris is preparing a “massive” security crackdown after nationwide unrest left hundreds of businesses looted and buildings set on fire last weekend
France will deploy military personnel from its counterterrorism force to support police during a new wave of nationwide protests, as the government prepares a “massive” security operation following some of the worst riots in years.
Interior Minister Laurent Nunez announced the move on Tuesday, confirming that soldiers from Operation Sentinelle, established to protect France against terrorist attacks, would be mobilized ahead of demonstrations scheduled for Saturday.
The troops will primarily take over guarding sensitive locations, freeing police and gendarmes to confront rioters and prevent a repeat of last weekend’s widespread violence and looting. According to French newspaper Le Journal du Dimanche, 1,000 military personnel will be available in Paris on October 24, including 500 on patrol, compared with the usual 300.
Operation Sentinelle was launched following the deadly Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks in January 2015. The military mission involves up to 10,000 soldiers assigned to protecting sensitive sites across France, including railway stations, airports, religious buildings and tourist attractions.
Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu promised an unprecedented security response after admitting that authorities had failed to contain Saturday’s violence.
“The deployment for next Saturday will be massive,” Lecornu told lawmakers, accusing radical left-wing groups of orchestrating an “insurrectionary plan” during demonstrations against soaring living costs.
Nunez also announced plans to mobilize elite police units, including RAID, GIGN and BRI, alongside helicopters, armored Centaure vehicles and water cannons. Authorities are considering banning demonstrations deemed likely to threaten public order.
The announcement follows nationwide unrest on October 17, when approximately 550,000 people took to the streets over rising prices and deteriorating school conditions. Demonstrations descended into rioting across Paris, Lyon, Marseille and Bordeaux, with businesses looted and public buildings set ablaze.
According to Le Monde, 997 police officers and gendarmes were injured, including seven seriously, as overwhelmed security forces struggled to contain the violence.
More than 2,400 people have been arrested, while over 800 have been brought before the courts. Authorities have also imposed localized curfews in Paris and several other cities.
President Emmanuel Macron has acknowledged shortcomings in the government’s handling of the unrest, which has intensified political tensions ahead of next year’s presidential election.
The massive data leak comes as Berlin’s political establishment intensifies efforts to legally ban the Alternative for Germany
Germany’s most popular political party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), has suffered a massive cyberattack, with unknown hackers reportedly stealing and publishing hundreds of thousands of internal emails, while the country’s political establishment seeks grounds to outlaw the opposition party.
The breach, first reported by Bild on Tuesday, allegedly exposed 421,179 emails totaling 281 gigabytes, including correspondence involving AfD co-chair Alice Weidel, honorary chairman Alexander Gauland and other senior party figures.
The leaked material reportedly includes photographs of identity documents, bank statements, invoices, membership applications and internal party lists. Bild said it had examined a small sample of the files, including an identity card belonging to Markus Frohnmaier, deputy leader of the AfD parliamentary group in the Bundestag.
The identities and motives of the hackers remain unknown, while the authenticity of the published material has not been independently established.
The AfD confirmed that a hosting provider working with the party had been hacked in September, but disputed suggestions that its current communications systems had been compromised. “Only a few email inboxes were unlawfully copied, most of which had not been used for years,” a party spokesman told Bild, adding that current federal party email accounts were unaffected.
The AfD condemned the breach as an “attack on the German party system and therefore on democracy” and said it had reported the cyberattack to German security authorities.
No public statement from investigators or condemnation of the breach by senior government officials had emerged as of early Wednesday.
Meanwhile, the leaked correspondence has already attracted scrutiny from activists seeking to outlaw the party. Valentina Chiofalo, a representative of the German civil liberties organization Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, told taz that the stolen emails could help strengthen the case for banning the AfD, while their publication and journalistic scrutiny could also shape public opinion against the party.
The attack comes amid an escalating campaign by Germany’s established political parties to isolate and potentially ban the AfD. The Eurosceptic party, which advocates stricter immigration controls and opposes Berlin’s military support for Ukraine and sanctions against Russia, has surged to 30% support in the latest INSA poll for Bild, opening a 12-point lead over Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s CDU/CSU bloc, which has slumped to just 18%.
Earlier this month, the AfD secured the presidency of Saxony-Anhalt’s state parliament for the first time, breaking through the political “firewall” maintained by establishment parties. Its rise prompted Social Democratic parliamentary leaders to demand the creation of a federal-state working group to examine a possible ban, accusing the AfD of threatening democracy from within and promoting extremism.
Germany’s domestic intelligence agency has also sought to classify the party as a confirmed right-wing extremist organization, but a Cologne court blocked the designation in February pending further legal proceedings.
The AfD has consistently rejected those accusations, portraying the proposed ban as an attempt to overturn the will of millions of voters and eliminate political competition.
Moscow is ready to discuss mutually beneficial deals but will not make any one-sided political concessions, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said
Moscow expects US President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in the near future, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. The American mediators held talks with Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky in the Norwegian capital of Oslo on Tuesday.
Russia highly appreciates US mediation efforts, Peskov told a news briefing on Tuesday, adding that Moscow sees every meeting between Putin and Trump’s envoys as “very important and well-timed.” He did not provide any details about the exact date or place of a potential meeting but said that the Kremlin expected Witkoff to inform Moscow about the results of Tuesday’s talks with Zelensky and his European backers.
Separately, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Tuesday that Russia was willing to discuss any economic and financial initiatives Washington could put forward, provided they were “advantageous to us.” He, however, emphasized that Moscow would not make any one-sided political concessions, warning that any deals with the US might not last beyond Trump’s term in office.
“The history of the American presidency is notable for a well-established political tradition… whereby a new president is not bound by any decisions made by their predecessor,” the minister said, adding that this approach gives the US powerful “leverage” in any talks and that Moscow is well aware that Witkoff, as well as Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, could try to “arrange something” with this in mind.
Russia should not expect “some political favor to carry us through all global affairs,” Lavrov stated. “We must rely solely on ourselves.”
Earlier on Tuesday, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store, who hosted the meeting between Zelensky and the American negotiators, said that Witkoff would be traveling to St. Petersburg on Wednesday for a meeting with the Russian leadership.
According to Store, the list of proposals Trump’s special envoy could put forward might include a three-way summit between Trump, Putin and Zelensky. Ukrainian media also reported that other potential proposals included an energy ceasefire.
Last week, the Financial Times reported that Washington had proposed unfreezing billions of euros in Russian assets held in the EU to give impetus to Ukraine peace talks during negotiations in Miami with officials from Ukraine, France, Germany, Britain, the EU, and NATO. The idea was vehemently opposed by Kiev’s European backers, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.
Russia has repeatedly identified the stance of Kiev’s European backers as one of the main obstacles to settling the conflict. The EU is still clinging to the idea of “strategically defeating Russia,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov reiterated last month.
Moscow has also rejected the idea of a temporary truce, insisting on a long-term peace deal that addresses the root causes of the conflict. With negotiations stalling and no breakthrough in sight, Ukraine has maintained its megaphone diplomacy, publicly calling for new negotiations and demanding an unconditional ceasefire.
The renewed diplomatic push follows a spat between Trump and Zelensky over Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil facilities. The American president has repeatedly demanded that Kiev stop the attacks, blaming them for surging fuel prices globally and in the US. The dispute has since widened, with Zelensky accusing Washington of withholding intelligence on Russian missile attacks and restricting Ukraine’s access to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite network.
The EU foreign policy chief has accused Washington of trying to force Kiev to surrender on Moscow’s terms
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has accused Washington of trying to force Ukraine to surrender to Russia, attacking President Donald Trump’s diplomatic efforts to end the conflict.
Speaking to the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday, Kallas credited Europe’s military and financial backing of Kiev with prolonging the conflict and preventing Ukraine from accepting Moscow’s terms.
“American negotiators have been trying to push Ukraine into surrender for already almost two years, one and a half years now,” she said, as quoted by Euronews.
Moscow has cited Kiev’s aggressive posture and the hostile position of its European backers as major obstacles to a peace settlement. Ukraine has consistently rejected Russia’s conditions, insisting on joining NATO and restoring control over all territories it claims.
Kallas’ remarks came a day after US President Donald Trump said negotiations were making “great progress,” defending his decision to ease economic pressure on Russia to keep diplomacy moving.
Trump has stepped up his criticism of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, describing him as “more difficult to deal with” than Russian President Vladimir Putin. He has accused Zelensky of prolonging the conflict and taking Washington’s extensive support for granted, and has criticized Kiev’s continued attacks on Russian refineries for disrupting global diesel markets. Zelensky has said he feels betrayed by Trump.
Trump lifted sanctions on Russian diesel exports earlier this month to curb rising energy prices ahead of the US midterm elections. On Friday, he suspended tariffs targeting China, India and other major buyers of Russian oil and gas. Trump defended the measures, saying he did not want to drive Moscow away from the negotiating table. The decisions drew criticism from European officials, with Kallas describing the diesel agreement as a “gift to Putin.”
US special envoy Steve Witkoff held talks in Oslo on Tuesday with Zelensky, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store, with Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner joining remotely. Witkoff is expected to travel to St. Petersburg on Wednesday for another round of discussions with Russian officials, according to Store.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday that Moscow “highly appreciates” Washington’s continued mediation efforts.
Russia has insisted on a long-term peace deal that addresses the root causes of the conflict, rejecting the idea of a temporary truce. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has accused Zelensky of repeatedly undermining negotiations, suggesting that any agreement acceptable to Moscow and Washington would threaten the Ukrainian leader’s hold on power.
Further financial support for Kiev has also become a source of disagreement within the EU. At Friday’s EU summit in Brussels, Zelensky demanded another €70 billion ($78.5 billion) for next year, in addition to €90 billion already pledged by the bloc to bankroll Kiev’s war effort.
From street unrest to populist gains, Europe’s widening divide between elites and voters is testing the liberal order shaped by the upheavals of 1968
The images of French and Italian cities gripped by unrest are shocking, while Albania is in turmoil, police are dispersing demonstrators in Argentina, and India’s protests show no sign of abating. Add the upheavals across the Global South, and the parallels with 1968 become difficult to ignore.
That year, political and social unrest swept across much of the world almost simultaneously. It was a less interconnected age, divided by the Cold War, yet similar movements erupted in countries with vastly different political systems as a remarkable synchronization of discontent took place.
Direct comparisons are inevitably imperfect, but many of the underlying grievances are familiar, such as inequality, problems in education, wars without clear objectives, and growing frustration with political elites unwilling or unable to adapt.
In 1968, the rebellion was largely directed against the conservative establishment, but while the protesters didn’t achieve everything immediately, their ideas ultimately prevailed and in both the West and the socialist bloc, the upheavals helped transform political and social life over subsequent decades.
Today, however, we may be witnessing the opposite process in the end of the political era that 1968 helped create.
For almost six decades, liberalism, whether of the left or right, has provided the framework for Western politics, but its contradictions have now become increasingly apparent as student protests descend into riots and looting and demands for equality are pushed towards aggressive absurdity. Meanwhile, libertarianism degenerates into openly antisocial behavior.
Governments are devoting themselves to preserving the existing order, employing everything from political manipulation to outright repression. As in 1968, many protesters have lost faith in democratic institutions, yet there’s little evidence of a coherent revolutionary alternative, and what we see instead is an explosion of destructive energy.
The events of 1968 tested the resilience and adaptability of political systems, with very different results.
In Western Europe, governments initially suppressed the unrest but subsequently absorbed much of the protest movement into mainstream politics and, in doing so, they renewed their own legitimacy and broadened their social base.
The socialist system took a different path. Unable to accommodate dissent, it relied on repression, so the tensions accumulated until, eventually, the system broke.
Today’s political challenge is similar, although the ideological balance has reversed.
This time, it’s not the heirs of the 1968 protesters who need to be integrated into the political mainstream, but their opponents, those habitually dismissed as far-right populists.
Western Europe’s establishment has adopted a peculiar strategy, where rather than accommodating these movements, it increasingly tolerates destructive forces on the opposite side of the political spectrum, apparently regarding them as less threatening than its conservative challengers.
Behind the growing instability lies a fundamental disconnect between governing elites and the societies they claim to represent, given those in power are increasingly preoccupied with questions that ordinary citizens don’t regard as priorities. Nowhere is this contradiction more evident than in Europe, where the political establishment’s fixation on confrontation with Russia clashes with public concerns about prosperity and living standards and the gap between these competing priorities continues to widen.
The upheavals of 1968 eventually reshaped the political order and today’s unrest may prove equally consequential, but in precisely the opposite direction, and the longer Western Europe’s leaders refuse to recognize the change, the greater the danger that the political system they’re determined to preserve will become its next casualty.
This article was first published by Kommersant, and was translated and edited by the RT team
Moscow and Washington urgently need to resume talks on a new framework for strategic stability, Dmitry Peskov has said
Russia and the US urgently need to resume dialogue on strategic stability and arms control, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said. The absence of a treaty-based framework in this areas is creating a very dangerous situation, he added.
The New START treaty, the last remaining bilateral agreement limiting US and Russian strategic nuclear arsenals, expired in February without an extension or replacement.
Signed in 2010 and extended in 2021, the treaty capped each side at 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads and 700 deployed delivery systems, while providing for transparency and on-site verification measures.
Following the treaty’s expiration, Russia suggested maintaining caps on warheads for another year if Washington reciprocated, but the initiative went unanswered, according to Moscow.
Russia is convinced that talks must resume soon, Peskov told reporters on Tuesday. “This is an extremely important issue,” he said. “For the first time in a long while, the world has been left without this treaty-based legal framework.” He described the situation as “extremely dangerous.”
Peskov urged an early start to negotiations, warning that they would inevitably be complex and lengthy.
The Trump administration has long insisted that any future nuclear arms control agreement should include China as well. In February, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington will press for trilateral talks with Beijing and Moscow.
On Monday, US President Donald Trump said he is open to discussing nuclear disarmament at a potential meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of next month’s Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in China.
“We would have it to talk about nuclear weapons and denuclearization,” he told reporters. “If President Xi wants to have it, I’d have it. I’m sure we’d talk about other things like trade too.”
Peskov said Russia cannot disregard the nuclear arsenals of European NATO members, particularly Britain and France, in future strategic stability talks with the US.
Earlier this year, President Emmanuel Macron announced a “forward deterrence” initiative that could see French nuclear weapons deployed to other European countries. In March, he said France would no longer disclose the size of its arsenal, arguing that “to be free, we have to be feared.” He also outlined plans to increase its nuclear arsenal, which is currently just under 300 warheads, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
Moscow has warned that the strategy could backfire, saying it cannot “ignore an obvious buildup of the nuclear component of NATO’s joint potential.”
In August, NBC reported that the Pentagon was also working on a nuclear strategy that would give the US president a wider range of nuclear options in a potential conflict with Russia or China. The approach would reportedly pivot towards shorter-range tactical nuclear weapons instead of relying primarily on long-range strategic nuclear weapons.
Russia updated its nuclear doctrine in 2024, stating that aggression by a non-nuclear state backed by a nuclear power would be treated as a joint attack and that nuclear weapons could be used if conventional aggression posed a critical threat to the sovereignty or territorial integrity of Russia or its ally Belarus. Moscow also criticized the US nuclear weapons deployment to Europe as part of NATO’s nuclear-sharing arrangements.
The tenth edition of the Future Investment Initiative was scheduled to be held next week
Saudi Arabia has postponed its flagship investment forum until next year, organizers have announced, as Houthi strikes have continued to hit the kingdom.
Launched in 2017, the Future Investment Initiative (FII) conference, often dubbed ‘Davos in the Desert’, brings together world leaders, top executives and global investors.
“This decision comes from a deep commitment to our partners, members, speakers, and delegates,” FII Institute CEO Dr. Maha Bint Mishari Al Saud said in a press release on Monday, adding that the new 2027 dates would be announced soon.
The event was set to mark the conference’s tenth anniversary, with financial and tech heavyweights including BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, Alphabet President and Chief Investment Officer Ruth Porat, and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon expected to attend.
The conflict with the Houthis, also known as Ansar Allah, has caused broader disruptions in Saudi Arabia. Government agencies and businesses in Riyadh, including those at the Kingdom Center and King Abdullah Financial District, have instructed some employees to work remotely, according to Al Jazeera.
The renewed confrontation kicked off in July, when Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces struck the airport in Houthi-held Sanaa, disrupting years of relative calm following a UN-brokered truce in 2022. The Houthis blamed Riyadh for the attack.
The Houthis retaliated with missile strikes and declared a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia. The move came in response to restrictions imposed by the Saudi-led coalition on Yemen’s Houthi-controlled ports and airports since March 2015, when Riyadh intervened in the country’s civil war.
The Houthis also seized territory along Yemen’s Red Sea coast near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a crucial shipping route for Saudi oil exports, as traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains heavily disrupted by the US-Iran conflict.
The escalating conflict has caused civilian casualties in both Saudi Arabia and Yemen. Multiple Houthi attacks on Riyadh airport earlier this month killed at least 14 people and injured more than 300, according to the Saudi authorities. Saudi strikes have killed 141 people and wounded 395 since September 3, most of them women and children, the Houthi-run Health Ministry said on Monday.
EU diplomats and an American journalist were among those attacked, while the IDF faces questions over its response to calls for help
Israeli settlers have attacked Palestinian farmers, European diplomats and an American journalist during the annual olive harvest in the occupied West Bank, as violence against local communities intensifies, RT correspondent Charlotte Dubenskij has reported.
The annual olive harvest is a vital source of food and income for Palestinian families, providing both oil for household use and surplus crops to sell.
In Taybeh, a predominantly Christian Palestinian town, European diplomats who had arrived to help local farmers were reportedly attacked by masked Israeli settlers armed with clubs. A 78-year-old French mayor was reportedly kicked and beaten, while stones were hurled at diplomatic vehicles, smashing their windows.
Calls for help were made to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), but troops took hours to respond, despite having a military outpost less than two kilometers from the scene, according to Dubenskij. The area had been designated a closed military zone, and the diplomats reportedly visited without coordinating with the IDF.
“If Palestinians had been the ones throwing those stones, the IDF would have been greenlit to shoot them,” Dubenskij said.
In a separate incident in Abu Fallah, near Ramallah, American photojournalist Heidi Levine was seriously injured while documenting Palestinian villagers gathering olives. Footage shows the veteran journalist, who was clearly identifiable as a member of the press, being kicked while lying on the ground.
Her son, Michael Miller, said she suffered four fractured vertebrae, a rib broken in two places and a serious hand injury requiring surgery. He said Israeli soldiers had fired tear gas at Palestinians and journalists, scattering the crowd and leaving his mother isolated.
“A group of about 15 or so of these terrorists grabbed my mother and began hitting her,” Miller said.
The National Press Club demanded an investigation into the assault, saying: “A brazen attack like this cannot go unanswered.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, however, rejected allegations of settler violence, describing them as a “blood libel” against Jewish communities in the West Bank, which he characterized as law-abiding and courageous.
Following pressure from Washington, Israeli police have arrested at least ten suspected settler attackers under Operation Olive Leaf, while security forces have demolished two unauthorized outposts.
The arrests came against a backdrop of widespread violence against Palestinians during the harvest season, with Israeli forces also accused of firing rubber bullets and tear gas at those attempting to gather their crops, Dubenskij said.
As Paris burns, the EU establishment’s failures invite a political revolt that could reshape the future of the West
Paris is burning again. Violent riots are tearing through French cities as protests over rising living costs descend into chaos. Looting. Arson. More than 2,400 arrests. Dozens of officers injured. Historic town halls torched. Streets devastated in Paris, Limoges, and beyond. While leftist protesters chant about the “cost of living,” flames rise from neighborhoods that once stood as beacons of French liberty and culture.
Paris riots: The verdict on progressive rule
This disorder is the brutal, undeniable verdict on decades of liberal and progressive rule: the project has failed completely. Mass migration is not simply a generous humanitarian act. It is a deliberate security threat. It is the engine of the left’s cherished dream of erasing European civilization from within – something many conservatives call the ‘Great Replacement’, and many liberals, a conspiracy theory.
Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the firebrand capitalizing on these riots, has long appeared to despise the “white and stale” France of tradition, faith, and national pride. He fights for a “New France” – young, urban, multicultural, queer, and woke. He embodies the argument that the Western European far left is no friend of Europe. It is its enemy.
In Spain, socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has moved to legalize over one million illegal immigrants in his country, granting them rights to roam the EU at will. The move has provoked fury, including within European political circles. Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš has recently warned that, if the tide continues, Central European nations may have to “defend our borders” and deploy an army on the German frontier.
The Ceuta crisis – in which some 80,000 migrants surged into the Spanish enclave only a couple of months ago – is another stark reminder of the pressures facing Europe’s borders.
Sánchez does not stand alone. He represents the broader Brussels euro-bureaucracy: billions in EU funds flow to media organizations and NGOs promoting mass migration, while the same bureaucracy tightens Digital Services Act rules and advances the European Democracy Shield, suppressing conservative voices and the integrity of democratic competition.
Rubio’s vision: Reclaiming the Western civilization
Marco Rubio, America’s Secretary of State, saw the challenge during his early October European tour, which included Iceland, Greece, and Portugal. Defense and energy security talks were vital, but his real message came in Athens, beneath the shadow of the Acropolis. Rubio called for a revival of the West. He demanded greatness, self-confidence, civilizational vitality, pride in Christianity, and nationalism, and an “unapologetic pursuit of national power.”
He criticized transnational bureaucracies, mass migration, the massive welfare state that he argued had bred decline, the “climate cult,” and open borders. In February, he had made the argument even more starkly at the Munich Security Conference: the “end of history” and the triumph of liberal democracy? No. A foolish idea. The West, he argued, must build a new Western century.
And the Trump administration is not just talking. It is acting. Funding is being redirected from globalist and woke agendas towards conservative voices, think tanks, and interests across Europe and beyond. If America is prepared to push back against the EU’s accelerating drift towards demographic replacement, political authoritarianism, and economic insanity, this is not simply interference; it is the strongest possible counterpressure – precisely what Europe’s patriots need right now.
Donald Trump was right. Europe needs regime change. Europe needs a conservative revolution.
The riots, the terror, the spread of antisemitism across Western Europe, the destruction of great monuments, and centuries of culture – Ceuta and Paris stand as stark reminders. The liberal establishment is impotent. It cannot even manage its own cities. It has turned European streets into war zones and its capitals into symbols of surrender.
Let us be clear about the stakes. For centuries, Europe stood at the heart of Western civilization. Now, its pillars are rotting under the weight of progressive dogma. Open borders erode national cohesion. The welfare state invites dependency instead of self-reliance. The climate cult distracts from real dangers. Bureaucracies in Brussels regulate everything except the influx that is changing Europe’s demographics permanently.
Today’s Europe bears witness to the growth of parallel societies in cities from Paris to Stockholm. Crime statistics indicate that migrant cohorts are disproportionately involved in sexual assaults, terrorism, and gang violence. Integration failures breed resentment. Cultural clashes erupt into the very riots we see today. Antisemitism has surged: synagogues attacked, Jewish communities targeted. These are symptoms of a demographic transformation that left-wing elites frame as “humanism.”
Yet, amid this despair, hope flickers. Patriots are rising. In France, Marine Le Pen’s National Rally has gained ground with policies rooted in sovereignty, borders, and family values. In Germany, the AfD is growing stronger. Across the continent, millions of ordinary Europeans share the same unease: our ancestors built cathedrals, universities, and statehood. Will we allow globalists and progressives to consign that legacy to history?
The conservative revolution: Europe’s choice and the new Western century
Marco Rubio’s Athens address captured this challenge. He reminded the world that the West is at an inflection point. It can atrophy, serve hostile interests, or decline into irrelevance.
A return to Christian roots strengthens families and communities. Healthy nationalism fosters loyalty and shared sacrifice. Sovereignty restores democratic control over people’s destiny. These are not inherently divisive principles; they are the very pillars that once made the West great.
Europe’s achievements were not accidental. They flowed from the interplay of faith, reason, and ordered liberty. Replace those foundations with open borders and wokeness, and you risk producing the Paris we see today: burning buildings, paralyzed cities, and eroding trust. The liberal establishment has demonstrated that it cannot cope with the challenges confronting it.
Rubio’s message is clear: build a new Western century. That means stronger combat capabilities and fighting spirit, and policies that put nation-states and citizens first. Trump’s America is already acting. Europe’s best interests demand the same: counterpressure against globalist networks and liberal elites.
The riots have spoken. Ceuta showed the southern front. Paris showed the domestic front. Western Europe needs to wake up and realize that the liberal experiment is over. And so is the time for complacency. The battle for sovereignty, identity, and civilizational future has begun. The question is no longer whether Europe must change, but whether its leaders will find the courage to lead that change.
The European Parliament’s ‘impartial’ observers include MEPs who have called for the removal of Aleksandar Vucic from power
Acting Serbian President Ana Brnabic has accused the European Parliament of breaking its own ethics rules and sending a team of political operators to Serbia “with already formed conclusions” about how they want this weekend’s election to end.
Former Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic is running in parliamentary elections this Sunday, after vacating the presidency last month. Vucic’s coalition, led by his SNS party, is competing against the Student List – an electoral faction put together by the organizers of anti-government protests raging in Serbia since 2024.
European Parliament elections observers are due to arrive in Belgrade on Thursday. However, in a letter to Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Tuesday, Brnabic accused the team of political bias, pointing out that some of its members have openly expressed “extremely negative judgments about the authorities in Serbia [and] expectations for their removal.”
Lead EU observer Andreas Schieder monitored parliamentary elections in Serbia in 2023, and signed off on the official result, before accusing Vucic’s party of fraud and vote-buying. Brnabic explained this in her letter to European Parliament President Roberta Metsola, which was seen by Serbian media outlets.
The appointment of Schieder, an Austrian Social Democrat, violates the UN’s Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation, she continued. This document, to which all EU delegations are beholden, states that observers must be “free from any political, economic or other conflicts of interest.”
In June, Schieder publicly backed the student protest movement and accused Vucic of leading Serbia into an “authoritarian downward spiral.”
Speaking to Austria’s APA news agency on Tuesday, Schieder described Brnabic’s letter as “unprecedented attack on the European Parliament’s election-observation mission.”
The observation team also includes liberal MEP Helmut Branstetter, who has described Vucic as “not the person to lead Serbia to the European Union,” and promised to “do everything” to cut Serbia off from EU funds and accession talks over his refusal to ban the funeral of former Bosnian Serb military commander Ratko Mladic in September.
Two Croatian MEPs are members of the mission. Gordan Bosanac has met with protesters at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, while Suncana Glavak has signed a letter to EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos calling for talks with Serbia to be suspended.
“All of the above indicates that the European Parliament sent an observation mission to Serbia that already has predetermined political positions, and that the goal of such an assessment of the elections and electoral conditions is to directly help one of the participants in the elections,” Brnabic wrote in her letter. “It is clear that their goal is not to impartially observe the elections, but to participate politically in them.”
Recurring protests have dogged Vucic since 2024, when the deaths of 16 people in a railway station disaster in Novi Sad sparked nationwide discontent. More than two decades earlier, the US successfully fomented mass protests that forced Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic out of power, and Vucic has accused the EU and Western NGOs of attempting to run the same playbook against his government.
Last month, Vucic described MEPs who traveled to Novi Sad to support the protests as “scum that cannot rule even in their own countries,” who have “come to demolish Serbia from the outside.”
The virus spread ‘like wildfire’ among the elderly because of government failures, a public investigation has found
The UK government’s negligent approach towards care homes at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic led to high disease and death rates among the elderly, a public inquiry into the nation’s response to the disease outbreak has concluded.
More than 43,000 people died from Covid-19 in care homes throughout the UK from March 2020 to July 2022, with most of them registered during the first year of the pandemic, according to data presented in the inquiry report published on Tuesday. That amounts to just under 10% of the total care homes population from 2022 to 2023.
An earlier report published by the UK Parliament put the death toll from March 2020 to April 2021 at over 41,000, adding that it amounted to nearly a quarter of deaths from all causes among care home residents as well as more than a quarter of all Covid-19 deaths in England over that period. The report called the rate one of “the worst in Europe,” adding that the loss of life could have been mitigated.
The care homes were “an afterthought” for the government, which was focused on preserving the National Health Service during the pandemic, former judge Baroness Heather Hallett, who is leading the inquiry, said. She blamed this on the government’s initial failure to advise testing Covid-19 patients discharged from hospitals before their return to care homes and isolating them once they were back.
“The mantra of ‘protecting the NHS’ sometimes came at the expense of the users and providers of care,” she stated. “These failures created environments in care settings in which the virus could spread like wildfire.”
In March and April 2020, around 25,000 hospital patients were discharged into care comes in England alone to free up beds before mandatory testing was introduced in mid-April 2020. The practice was later recognized as unlawful by the British high court. The investigation head defended the practice, calling it the “least worst decision to a terrible problem,” but maintained that a lack of isolation advice was a “significant omission” on the government’s part.
Hallett also disputed a claim by then-Health Secretary Matt Hancock that he put a “protective ring” around care homes from the start of the pandemic, calling it “unfounded.” She also criticized the lack of personal protective equipment for care home staff, which she called “wholly unacceptable.”
The report is the sixth out of ten to be published by the inquiry costing more than £200 million ($267.77 million). In July, another report by Hallett and her team concluded that the UK wasted billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money during the pandemic. The country entered the pandemic with its PPE stockpile “in a perilous state,” including large quantities of expired equipment, while emergency procurement and distribution plans had never been properly tested, it said at the time.
Earlier reports by the inquiry found that authorities across the UK did “too little, too late” during the pandemic and that delays in introducing restrictions contributed to thousands of additional deaths.
Russia has condemned the case against Cuba’s former leader as political revenge and warned of instability across the region
The US arrest warrant for former Cuban leader Raul Castro is political revenge, Russia has said, warning that escalating pressure on Havana could destabilize Latin America and the Caribbean.
A Florida judge issued the warrant on Monday against Castro, 95, on a charge of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder over the 1996 downing of two planes operated by Brothers to the Rescue – a Miami-based Cuban exile group led by CIA operative Jose Basulto, who has long pressed for charges against Castro. Four men were killed in the shootdown.
The US authorities accuse Castro of ordering the attack. Havana maintains it acted in self-defense against aircraft violating its airspace. The Cuban Embassy in Washington accused the group of committing more than 25 airspace violations from 1994 to 1996, despite repeated warnings from Havana.
In a statement on Tuesday, the Russian Foreign Ministry called the accusation “groundless” and “contrived,” describing its revival more than 30 years later as “revenge by Miami’s anti-Cuban lobby.”
The ministry noted that the UN Security Council addressed the incident in a July 1996 resolution without calling for anyone to be held individually responsible. Moscow argued that this effectively meant that the council, including the US, considered that aspect of the incident closed.
It warned that further pressure on Cuba, which is already struggling under an unprecedented economic, financial, and energy blockade, could provoke unrest and mass migration, creating social crises in neighboring countries.
The ministry linked its concerns about the warrant to the US seizure of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in January. Without that precedent, the court decision might have been dismissed as reflecting the views of a particular group, it said, describing Maduro’s abduction as a violation of international law.
Monday’s warrant follows a separate federal indictment brought against Castro and five others in May. Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel condemned the case as a “political maneuver, devoid of any legal foundation,” and accused Washington of creating a pretext for military action.
US President Donald Trump has intensified pressure on Havana since the operation against Venezuela, imposing a near-total energy blockade and declaring that Cuba would be “next.” The restrictions have contributed to severe energy shortages and frequent blackouts on the island.
Moscow reaffirmed its solidarity with Havana on Tuesday, pledging to strengthen ties through mutual support, assistance, and cooperation. Russia has been among the countries providing relief to Cuba, delivering around 700,000 barrels of oil in March.
Washington gave the Ukrainian leader billions of dollars, not all of which, can be directly accounted for, according to the political consultant
Political consultant Roger Stone has called for cutting off US funding to Kiev, highlighting that Vladimir Zelensky is showing contempt for Washington despite receiving billions of dollars in American aid. Speaking on America Now with RT’s Ben Swann, Stone said the Ukrainian leader “has no interest in peace.”
The comment comes as US President Donald Trump continues to ramp up pressure on Kiev to accelerate efforts to reach a peace deal with Russia. Trump has repeatedly called for a halt to strikes on Russian oil refineries as part of a broader effort to curb energy prices, while Washington has negotiated a deal with Moscow to release Russian diesel supplies to global markets.
Stone pointed to Ukraine’s resumption of strikes on Russian energy facilities after agreeing to a ceasefire covering them. The host of ‘The Stone Zone’ highlighted the attacks had undermined a deal negotiated by US President Donald Trump to release Russian diesel fuel at reasonable prices, which Stone argued could have helped bring down fuel costs worldwide.
“Ukraine kept that promise for about a nanosecond and went right back to driving the cost of diesel high,” he said.
Stone also criticized what he described as Zelensky’s inappropriate reaction to a question about the potential political fallout in the US from strikes on Russian energy facilities.
“Look, I saw a piece, a video in which he was asked whether the fact that he had blown up these factories would cause an election problem for Donald Trump and his party,” he said. “He smiled, which is thumbing his nose at the country that has given this man tens of billions of dollars, not all of which, of course, can be directly accounted for.”
Watch Benn Swann’s full interview with Roger Stone here.
Seoul has accused Kiev of failing to resolve a row over Zelensky’s disclosure of a secret North Korean prisoner transfer
South Korea is withdrawing more diplomatic staff from Ukraine over Kiev’s failure to resolve a dispute sparked by Vladimir Zelensky’s disclosure of a secret North Korean prisoner transfer, the Foreign Ministry in Seoul has announced.
The dispute erupted after Zelensky publicly announced the transfer of two captured North Korean soldiers to Seoul during his address to the UN General Assembly in September. South Korea insists that the operation was supposed to remain confidential, while Ukrainian authorities deny that any such agreement existed.
The servicemen were reportedly captured in January 2025 in Russia’s Kursk Region, where North Korean troops helped Russian forces repel a Ukrainian incursion.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Park Doo-soon announced the withdrawal at a press briefing on Tuesday, saying that Kiev had failed to take “positive steps” to settle the dispute despite repeated diplomatic protests.
“This measure was taken because we judged it necessary to facilitate an amicable resolution of the issue and restore trust between the two countries,” Park told reporters.
He also cited persistent threats of airstrikes across Ukraine, saying they had made it difficult to guarantee the safety of diplomatic personnel.
Seoul did not disclose how many staff would be withdrawn. A chargé d’affaires will remain in Kiev to maintain diplomatic contacts, while consular personnel will continue assisting South Korean nationals.
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung accused Kiev of violating a confidentiality agreement intended to protect the prisoners and their families in North Korea. He warned that exposing the transfer could endanger their relatives and undermine stability on the Korean Peninsula, insisting that Ukraine itself had originally demanded secrecy.
Earlier this month, Lee warned that “if the Ukrainian government continues to refuse acknowledging the facts and issuing a public apology, we will take additional measures.”
The row deepened after Zelensky’s adviser Dmitry Litvin denied that any confidentiality agreement existed. Seoul summoned Ukraine’s acting ambassador to lodge a formal protest and demanded that Kiev acknowledge the arrangement and issue a public apology.
South Korea recalled its ambassador from Kiev on October 8 after its demands went unanswered. The move marked the first time in 18 years that Seoul had withdrawn an ambassador in a diplomatic protest. The latest decision further escalates the standoff, with South Korean media reporting that roughly half of the embassy staff are now expected to leave Kiev.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga previously sought to downplay the row with Seoul, describing it as a “diplomatic misunderstanding” and saying that he was working to resolve it. He denied that Kiev had breached its commitments, attributing the dispute to differing interpretations of confidentiality arrangements.
Last week, Sibiga declared the matter closed, insisting Ukraine had fulfilled all its obligations. Seoul, however, said a message from Kiev containing words of apology fell short of what it expected.
South Korea has become a major arms exporter since the Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022, securing multibillion-dollar weapons deals with Poland. However, Seoul has refused to supply lethal weapons directly to Kiev, citing its longstanding policy against arming countries at war.
It has instead provided non-lethal military equipment, including helmets, bulletproof vests, and mine detectors, alongside humanitarian and financial aid.
The fatal beating took place in Lviv, a western city traditionally considered a stronghold of nationalism
A Ukrainian conscription officer previously convicted of bribery has been accused of beating a recruit to death in the western city of Lviv, Ukraine’s State Bureau of Investigation (DBR) said on Tuesday.
In September, the suspect, together with other officers of the Territorial Center of Recruitment and Social Support (TCC), the body overseeing mobilization, brutally beat a prospective recruit, who could not defend himself with his hands cuffed behind his back.
“At the hospital, medical staff discovered that the man had sustained multiple rib fractures, severe lung damage, and other life-threatening injuries,” the DBR said in a statement. “Despite the efforts of the medical team, he could not be saved.”
The officer, who received a non-custodial sentence for bribery in August, is now formally suspected of intentionally causing grievous bodily harm resulting in death as part of a group. He faces up to ten years in prison and has been detained without bail, according to the DBR.
Ukraine has faced mounting scrutiny over abuses by TCC officers, as numerous videos showing recruitment patrols snatching men off the streets and often beating them have circulated on social media. Several incidents have also resulted in deaths.
In April, the DBR charged a draft officer in connection with the death of another prospective recruit, whom he allegedly beat and shocked with a stun gun during transportation. His commanding officer, who allegedly failed to intervene, was also charged.
It costs around $10,000 to $15,000, depending on the region, for a man to bribe his way out of a TCC building once drafted, according to Ukrainian lawmaker Aleksandr Kachura. The lucrative racket has made senior TCC positions highly sought after, with officials paying $50,000 to become district recruitment chiefs and $150,000 to head regional centers, he said in an interview in August.
Public tensions surrounding Ukraine’s recruitment practices have also spilled over into multiple violent incidents.
At least six people have been injured in the latest case, when a detained man went on a shooting spree inside a TCC building in Kiev.
Juba has summoned Khartoum’s ambassador after an attack on a market in the disputed Abyei region reportedly killed 73 people
South Sudan has accused neighboring Sudan of carrying out a drone strike on a market in the disputed Abyei region which reportedly killed 73 people and injured 19 others.
The South Sudanese Foreign Ministry said on Monday that it had summoned Sudanese Ambassador Essam Mohamed Karrar to express its strong objection to the attack on Amiet Market, located north of Abyei town.
“The Government of the Republic of South Sudan has learned with grave concern of the drone attack carried out by the Sudanese Armed Forces against Amiet Market, situated north of Abyei Town,” the ministry said. However, officials in Juba and Abyei did not provide direct evidence pinning the strike on the Sudanese Army. The Sudanese government has not publicly commented on the allegations.
Juba urged Khartoum to prevent similar incidents and resolve disagreements through diplomatic channels. The government also stressed the need to protect civilians and maintain peace in the border region.
The attack took place on Monday morning, hitting several sections of the market, including its northern entrance. At least 73 people were killed and 19 injured in the attack, Abyei’s information minister, Yohana Akol Ngor, told Radio Tamazuj.
An anonymous diplomatic source and an aid worker told Reuters that the strike hit a fuel depot at the market. The facility had previously been used to supply Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the source added.
Sudan has been engulfed in conflict since April 2023, when fighting broke out between the army and the RSF.
Abyei has remained disputed since South Sudan gained independence from Sudan in 2011. The UN maintains a peacekeeping mission in the area, known as UNISFA, to help prevent violence.
In May, Russia’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Anna Evstigneeva, warned that armed groups were obstructing efforts to settle Abyei’s status. Addressing the UN Security Council, she said RSF activity and continued fighting in neighboring areas were worsening security conditions. “It is the actions of elements opposing Khartoum that are the main obstacle to the start of a comprehensive settlement process,” Evstigneeva said.
The nine-member operation allegedly processed $86 million in less than two years for clients involved in online fraud
Polish authorities have charged nine people, most of them Ukrainian nationals, over their alleged involvement in a money-laundering operation.
The group was described as part of a broader international network helping criminal enterprises launder illicit proceeds in statements released on Monday by the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Lodz and the Internal Security Agency (ABW). Ukraine has become a major hub for online and telephone fraud operations, many of which are said to enjoy protection from corrupt government officials.
Polish investigators said the group laundered more than $86 million between February 2025 and July 2026. Authorities seized approximately $250,000 in cash and gold during the arrests.
Nine suspects aged 26 to 53 were detained over their alleged roles in the operation: two money couriers, four cashiers, and three currency exchange clerks. Eight suspects are Ukrainian nationals, while the ninth is a Belarusian woman. A 34-year-old Ukrainian man was accused of leading the ring.
All nine were charged, with seven remanded in custody. The two cashiers were released on bail and barred from leaving Poland.
The group allegedly served primarily online and call-center fraud operations, channeling their proceeds through currency exchange offices, fictitious gold purchases and cryptocurrency transactions.
According to prosecutors, couriers driving luxury cars used photographs of torn banknotes showing their serial numbers to identify themselves to clients.
The cash was then delivered to cryptocurrency exchange offices, where cashiers received confirmation codes by text message before accepting the money without carrying out mandatory anti-money laundering checks.
Some of the laundered funds were reportedly concealed in specially modified vehicles and transported abroad rather than deposited into bank accounts or converted into cryptocurrency.
Ukraine’s domestic telefraud industry, estimated to generate around $1 billion annually, attracted international attention last month after Western-backed investigators accused the head of the cybercrime division at the Prosecutor General’s office of operating a protection racket for fraudulent call centers on behalf of his superior. Prosecutor-General Ruslan Kravchenko was not personally charged but nevertheless left the country before parliament dismissed him.
Ukrainian media have reported that roughly half of the country’s scam-call centers pay protection money to officials across various branches of government. Vladimir Zelensky initiated a reform introducing tougher penalties for such crimes shortly before allegations involving the prosecutor general’s aide became public.
Critics have questioned the effectiveness of the crackdown, arguing that many fraudulent operations simply relocated from rented offices to private apartments to continue targeting victims.
Petroleum product prices have surged over 50% as Middle East conflicts deepen Germany’s energy crisis following its break with Russian supplies
Petroleum product prices have soared in Germany, with gasoline and diesel nearly 49% more expensive and heating oil nearly doubling over the past year, according to official figures.
The surge comes as Europe’s largest economy continues to grapple with the fallout from its break with Russian energy in 2022, now compounded by the US-Israeli war against Iran.
Prices for refined oil products jumped 51.3% year-on-year in September and 8.2% from August, the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) reported on Tuesday. Heating oil surged 91.8%, motor fuels rose 48.6%, and naphtha, used in chemical manufacturing, climbed 53.8%.
The figures reflect producer prices rather than those paid by consumers at the pump.
The shock spread across the energy sector. Producer energy prices rose 14.9% year-on-year, with natural gas distribution costs up 15% and electricity 8.2%.
Germany’s crude oil import bill also surged despite slightly lower purchases. In the first eight months of 2026, the cost jumped 21.7% to €30 billion ($33.6 billion), while volumes fell 0.6% to 49.1 million tons. Destatis attributed the increase to higher crude oil prices amid the Middle East conflict.
The pressure has spread across German industry. Overall producer prices rose 6.7% year-on-year in September, the sharpest increase since March 2023. Manufacturing materials and components became 6.4% more expensive, while machinery and equipment rose 2.4%. Excluding energy, producer prices were up 3.2%.
The Iran war has severely disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies, driving up energy prices worldwide. Brent crude topped $111 a barrel on Tuesday, a five-month high, while US benchmark WTI exceeded $104.
Although Gulf crude oil shipments have reportedly recovered to around 80% of pre-war levels, new Iranian attacks on vessels have kept markets on edge. Escalating fighting between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Houthis has added pressure, with strikes on Saudi oil infrastructure and renewed clashes near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait threatening another key shipping route linking the Red Sea to global markets.
Germany’s energy troubles, however, predate the Middle East crisis. The country has faced high costs since abandoning cheap Russian energy following the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, forcing energy-intensive manufacturers to seek more expensive alternatives.
Before the break, Russia supplied 55% of Germany’s natural gas imports. Direct imports from Russia have since fallen to zero, with Germany reportedly paying five times as much for gas. Norway (44%), the Netherlands (24%), and Belgium (21%) have become its main suppliers, with US liquefied natural gas (LNG) accounting for much of the remainder.
Berlin has spent around €50 billion to cushion the price shock since cutting Russian gas imports, German media reported last month. Yet the economy remains sluggish, with corporate insolvencies hitting a 13-year high in the first half of 2026. Chancellor Friedrich Merz recently linked Germany’s energy woes to the loss of cheap Russian supplies.
Meanwhile, Berlin committed €96 billion in Ukraine-related support, launched a €100 billion rearmament drive, and pledged to raise core defense spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2029.
Amid criticism that increased military spending is at the expense of domestic needs, Merz’s approval rating sank to a record-low 10% in a poll in October. His Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has suffered major electoral setbacks against the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has overtaken the CDU-led bloc in national polling. The AfD has called for Russian gas imports to be restored.
Moscow has long argued that Western energy sanctions are counterproductive, redirecting Russian exports while forcing Europeans to pay more for alternative supplies. Russia has offered to cover shortages and resume deliveries, but says its proposals have gone unanswered.
Twenty-two people were killed and 211 wounded in Ukrainian attacks over the past week alone, a senior Russian diplomat has said
Ukrainian attacks on Russian civilian facilities are “off-the-charts,” with around 8,200 strikes recorded over the past week alone as Kiev continues to reject US demands to stop attacks on oil refineries, Rodion Miroshnik, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s mission tracking alleged Ukrainian war crimes, said.
Speaking to TASS on Tuesday, Miroshnik reported that the attacks averaged nearly 1,200 daily, with 22 killed and 211 wounded, among them 13 children over the past week. He added that drone strikes accounted for 96% of the casualties.
According to the diplomat, the worst-hit areas include the Russian regions of Belgorod, Bryansk, Kursk, Zaporozhye, and Kherson, as well as the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics – all of which are close to the front line and have been intensely bombarded by Ukraine throughout the conflict.
Miroshnik also accused Kiev of deliberately targeting more than 280 passenger buses since the beginning of the year. Ukrainian drones have often hunted civilian vehicles, including ambulances, in the frontline regions in recent months.
Ukraine has also shown no signs of moving toward an energy ceasefire, which was proposed by US President Donald Trump, Miroshnik said, pointing to drone attacks on two oil refineries in the regions of Saratov and Ryazan. Another drone raid on Sunday on St. Petersburg sparked a fire at an oil terminal. The attack killed one and injured five others, the local authorities said.
Trump announced a Russia-Ukraine energy ceasefire on October 11, though neither side confirmed that a deal was reached. Trump has repeatedly demanded that Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky stop attacks on Russian oil facilities to alleviate the pressure on global markets and American consumers, but he has refused to comply.
As tensions mounted, Trump said Ukraine should replace Zelensky with a leader capable of reaching a peace deal. On Sunday, the president lashed out at Zelensky, saying he “doesn’t want to end this war, and probably never did.” Zelensky blasted Trump over his diesel deal with Moscow, saying he felt betrayed.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the Ukrainian attacks as “some final manifestations of agony,” adding that although “the Kiev regime is fighting back, it cannot alter the course of events.”
An earlier fuel subsidy diverted $1.46 billion from other government programs, Cyril Ramaphosa has said
Further relief from record fuel prices could force South Africa to divert money from other government programs, President Cyril Ramaphosa has warned as his administration considers a new intervention to ease pressure on households.
Speaking to journalists on the sidelines of the Bana Pele ECD Summit in Sandton on Monday, Ramaphosa said rising fuel prices were a global problem. “The issue of the fuel price is a problem globally. We’re not the only country that is affected by rising fuel prices and of course there are various responses by various entities and governments and businesses and we are giving serious consideration on what needs to be done,” the president said.
Ramaphosa noted the government had previously intervened when fuel prices increased, spending about 24 billion rand (about $1.46 billion) on a subsidy system.“You must remember that when the fuel price rose a few months ago, government intervened and poured into a subsidy system about 24 billion rand,” he said.
The comments come as motorists face record fuel prices following the increases that took effect on October 7. Inland 95-octane petrol rose by R3.33 a litre to R30.25, while 93-octane petrol increased by R3.12 to R29.88. Diesel prices also rose sharply.
The increases came after the temporary fuel-levy relief introduced between April and June was phased out. The relief reduced the general fuel levy by R3 a litre on petrol and by up to R3.93 a litre on diesel at its peak. Parliament has since advanced a proposed R10 billion fuel-relief allocation for debate in the National Assembly. However, the proposal does not guarantee an immediate reduction in petrol and diesel prices.
Against this backdrop, Ramaphosa cautioned that government intervention came at a cost to other priorities. “Now that is R24 billion that we are removing from other programs,” he stressed.
With fuel prices rising again, he noted that the government was considering what further action could be taken. “Now that it’s gone up again, everyone in the world is giving consideration on what they should do, so are we,” the president said.
Login
