Brownstone Institute | Bert Olivier

In my reconstruction and discussion of Heidegger’s remark – in the course of the interview that he granted the German news magazine, Der Spiegel, in 1966 – that ‘Only a god can save us,’ it was shown that this issued from his conviction, that the ‘essence’ of modern technology (what he calls ‘technicity’) functions as a ‘framework’ within which every question and decision are formulated and made. He calls this ‘essence’ Gestell(‘posure,’ Enframing’), the fundamental organising power of which reduces everything in the world to a ‘standing-reserve,’ which means that its sole purpose is restricted to its usefulnessor calculative utility. 

So, for example, even human beings are approached as ‘resources,’ which is made visible in renaming what used to be called ‘Personnel Departments’ in companies (and other organisations) as ‘Human Resources.’ Hence, the essence of technology, or Enframing,’ brings about the stripping of entities of their intrinsic meaning, transforming them into mere resources for use, instead of allowing them to be what they are – and arguably should be – according to their own being. 

Norman Melchert (The Great Conversation. A Historical Introduction to Philosophy, Mayfield Publishing Company, 1991, p. 576) provides an apt characterisation of the world under the dominance of the essence of modern technology where he writes:

In the age of enframing, where everything is understood as standing-reserve, there is no ‘room’ for God. (Or perhaps even God is thought of as ‘standing-reserve’, a kind of public utility that can be used to gain the satisfaction of one’s desires; one often gets this impression from the television evangelists.

The most obvious question that would probably arise for most readers is why Heidegger talks about the essence of technicity or technology, which he names Gestell, instead of simply referring to concrete instances of technology in the guise of technical devices, such as electric drills, saws, and vacuum cleaners, all of which are embodiments of Enframing. The answer has to do with the fact that Heidegger thinks ontologically about technicity, and not ontically.

Ontology being the discipline that addresses questions concerning the distinctive (or essential) being of beings – what makes them into what they are, in contradistinction with other beings or entities – the essence of technicity is what makes technology into what it is distinctively, and technical devices embody this essence paradigmatically. Insofar as an electric drill manifests Enframing as its technological essence, it allows the handyman or -woman, by using it, to draw on the standing reserve of stored electricity in a manner which optimalises its usefulness. 

To think about electric drills in relation to other similar or dissimilar tools comparatively as part of a collection of ‘technologies’ is to focus on them ontically, and no longer ontologically. The following excerpt from Heidegger’s ‘The question concerning technology’ (In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Trans. William Lovitt, Garland Publishing Inc., New York, 1977, p. 14-15) clarifies what is at stake by contrasting an older way of benefiting technically from wind and water with its modern technological counterpart:

The revealing that rules in modern technology is a challenging [Herausfordern], which puts to nature the unreasonable demand that it supply energy that can be extracted and stored as such. But does this not hold true for the old windmill as well? No. Its sails do indeed turn in the wind; they are left entirely to the wind’s blowing. But the windmill does not unlock energy from the air currents in order to store it.

    In contrast, a tract of land is challenged into the putting out of coal and ore. The earth now reveals itself as a coal mining district, the soil as a mineral deposit. The field that the peasant formerly cultivated and set in order [bestellte] appears differently than it did when to set in order still meant to take care of and to maintain. The work of the peasant does not challenge the soil of the field. In the sowing of the grain it places the seed in the keeping of the forces of growth and watches over its increase. But meanwhile even the cultivation of the field has come under the grip of another kind of setting-in-order, which sets upon [stellt] nature. It sets upon it in the sense of challenging it.

Agriculture is now the mechanized food industry. Air is now set upon to yield nitrogen, the earth to yield ore, ore to yield uranium, for example; uranium is set upon to yield atomic energy, which can be released either for destruction or for peaceful use.

In the extract quoted above one finds an insightful summary on Heidegger’s part, of how the essence of modern technology ‘works itself through’ every aspect of the world within which human beings live, focusing particularly on the earth or land (soil) to demonstrate how the earlier relationship people had with these has been upended and transformed by modern technology. His emphasis is on how, in comparison with an earlier, premodern dispensation – when humans worked ‘with’ nature to survive, instead of harnessing or ‘challenging’ it – under the dominance of Gestell, everything is commandeered, forcing it to yield to human demands.

It is striking, from Heidegger’s evocative description, how the integrity of the earth (and air) is shattered in the process: coal, nitrogen, and uranium, for example, are extracted from the lived totality with which it comprises a unity – something that comes into view, in a compelling manner, in Heidegger’s essay, ‘Building, Dwelling, Thinking,’ where he elaborates on what he calls the unified ‘Fourfold’ of Earth, Sky, Mortals, and Divinities, as essential values for a truly human life. 

Not everyone (to put it mildly) likes Heidegger’s ‘essentialist’ approach to technology, however. As the Italian thinker, Agostino Cera (2020, ‘Beyond the Empirical Turn: Elements for an Ontology of Engineering,’ Információs Társadalom XX, no. 4: 74–89) has shown, since Heidegger’s time, philosophers have executed what he terms a significant ‘ontophobic turn,’ with most individuals writing about technology shifting their focus away from (that is, ‘replacing’) what was central for Heidegger, namely the essence of technology as such. Referring to the so-called ‘empirical turn’ in the philosophy of technology (which resonates with the ‘ontophobic turn,’ or ‘fear of ontology’), which amounts to philosophers of technology no longer contemplating ‘technology,’ but ‘technologies’ instead, Cera writes about this ‘replacement’ that (2020: 82):

I agree with the idea that such a replacement means much more than a lexical change, but in my view this semantic surplus corresponds to our increasing inability to acknowledge technology as something in itself/as such. In particular, I consider the main outcome of this replacement/inability to be what I call Mr Wolfe Syndrome. This formula is inspired by Harvey Keitel’s famous character in Quentin Tarantino’s movie Pulp Fiction (1994). This character presents himself as someone who ‘solves problems.’ By using this expression, I am therefore referring to the gradual transformation of the philosophy of technology into a problem-solving activity or, better, to the fact that philosophers of technologies are today becoming (or aspiring to become) ‘guys who solve problems.’ 

For Cera, this amounts to nothing less than ‘an epistemic metamorphosis of the philosophy of technology and, more generally, of philosophy itself’ (p. 82), insofar as it transforms it from an ontological discipline to an ontic or ‘positive’ science. Furthermore, reducing the philosophy of technology to such a positive, problem-solving science, the important distinction between ‘question’ and ‘problem’ is eradicated, he points out. A problem has a solution, while a question evokes several – sometimes many – possible answers, if not more questions.

A philosophical question is therefore by its very nature a fundamental question, or Grundfrage, which is the kind of ontological question I (not being an ontophobe) am posing here regarding what I perceive to be the present manifestation of a novel phase in the development – or ‘appearance’ in a phenomenological sense – of technology (technicity). This brings us back to Heidegger.

Heidegger calls the human attitude, which allows and promotes a ‘letting be’ of things according to their irreducible being, Gelassenheit (also translated as ‘releasement’), which contrasts starkly with the reduction carried out by Gestell, insofar as the latter transforms things into resources for use on demand, or a ‘standing-reserve.’ Sadly, there appears to be precious little of this attitude left in the world today, although one may encounter it on the part of exceptional individuals (such as the Norwegian philosopher, Arne Naess, founder of ‘deep ecology’).

Towards the end of Part 1 it was also suggested that, today, we are witnessing unmistakable signs that technicity has already moved beyond the stage of Gestell, which concerned Heidegger sufficiently to elicit his belief that humanity can only be saved by ‘a god.’ I called the emergent new stage by various names, all of which imply that, instead of ‘framing’ things in the world – animate and inanimate – as Gestell does, it is predicated on pervading or saturating everything (a process that has already been underway for some time).

These are: Pervasive Transhuman Agency, Transhuman Agentic Saturation, Optimal Digital Transformation, or Transformative Digital Protocol. Personally, I believe the first two are the most accurate, the reasons for which will become clear below. However, that the digital revolution we have been living through is central to this new phase of technicity is highlighted in the work of the late Bernard Stiegler. 

What is paradigmatic about this new phase of technicity? As philosophers of science (as well as some well-read individuals) would know, the popularisation of the term ‘paradigm’ (and ‘paradigmatic’) occurred in the wake of Thomas Kuhn’spublication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962), where he employed it to mean, broadly, the fundamental conception of, and beliefs concerning reality and knowledge underpinning a specific scientific or theoretical practice, as exemplified or manifested in a ‘concrete scientific achievement’ (p. 11), such as a boundary-shifting experiment.

In this foundational sense, there was a crucial difference between the paradigm on which Aristotelian-Ptolemaic science (or physics) was based (including the geocentric belief in the earth being stationary), and that which is behind Newtonian macro-mechanics (namely the heliocentric notion of the earth in motion). Moreover, such foundational paradigms are irreconcilable, or incommensurable, which is why Kuhn wrote that the transition from one scientific paradigm to another – that is, the switch of epistemic allegiance from one to the other by scientists – resembles a ‘conversion’ (p. 18-19) of sorts (a term that unmistakably resonates with a comparable religious phenomenon). 

Considering that the term, ‘paradigm’ is derived from the Late Latin paradigma (‘pattern, example,’ itself derived from Greek paradeigma – ‘pattern, model, example, precedent,’), it appears that the ‘concrete scientific achievement,’ for instance a crucial experiment which discloses the fundamental tenets of the theory or science in question, mentioned by Kuhn, functions as an ‘example’ setting the ‘pattern’ for scientific research in specific disciplines.

To ask the question concerning the paradigm in which the new phase of technicity is concretised – compared to Heidegger’s Gestell or Enframing, as model or paradigmatic example of which he adduces the hydroelectric power station on the river Rhine (in ‘The question concerning technology,’ referred to earlier) – is therefore precisely to ask what could legitimately be regarded as such an example or model. Keep in mind that, to be a model in this sense implies that the changed conception of ‘reality’ and knowledge should be demonstrably concretised in it. 

With these requirements in mind, two salient possibilities emerge as candidates for the paradigmatic embodiment of what is arguably a novel, transmogrified phase of technicity: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the vaccinated (human) body. How so? Both satisfy the descriptive criteria named earlier; to wit, Pervasive Transhuman Agency and Transhuman Agentic Saturation, insofar as all these descriptors apply to them, albeit not in the same manner. 

In the case of AI its transhuman character is obvious; it is beyond the human in terms of its inscrutable alterity (as I have argued at length before). It may justifiably be called agentic because it is increasingly apparent that it has agency, or can initiate events even where it is not built into constructions such as robotic skeletons or drones with the explicit purpose of carrying out certain ‘actions,’ whether these are pre-programmed or ‘autonomous.’ (I put ‘actions’ and ‘autonomous’ in scare quotes because these ‘performances’ are not the same as actions performed autonomously by humans, which arguably issue from certain volitional acts; that is, acts of free will.) 

Furthermore, although it may be claimed that AI has not attained saturation (yet), it demonstrably tends towards such saturation or pervasiveness, at least in what Manuel Castells calls the ‘space of flows,’ as shown by the fact that the internet is suffused by videos and texts that are of AI origin – sometimes acknowledged, and sometimes not. In the case of the latter it is becoming increasingly difficult to discern whether something is human- or AI-created.

The point is, however, that one can circumvent such AI-saturation, for example by avoiding the internet (using ‘dumb phones’ instead of smartphones, and by letting students write assignments or essays by hand, without access to the internet, for example), but paradoxically such evasions merely confirm the increasing ubiquity of AI in the current global communicational context. 

What about the ‘vaccinated human body’ – is it at all comparable to AI in terms of saturation or pervasiveness insofar as it is paradigmatic of the current phase of technology (or technicity)? I believe that it is. Obviously, as paradigm, this does not mean, as some people would perhaps think, that such a level of vaccinatedness is completely pervasive in a literal sense, although there is evidence that the target on the part of the agencies driving ‘universal’ vaccination against Covid-19 [flu renamed] was indeed the human population in its totality.

As paradigm, however, it represents not only the thing it literally names – the vaccinated human body – but far more than that, insofar as it functions as a kind of metonym, or ‘part for whole,’ where the ‘part’ gathers together in one figure all those diverse phenomena (the ‘whole’) that may be understood as tending towards a condition of technological, communicational, economic, financial, biotechnical, and chemical saturation, metonymically concretised in the ‘vaccinated human body’ (during the time of Covid). 

What makes ‘the vaccinated human body’ such an apposite candidate as paradigm of technology (technicity) in its current phase, namely ‘Pervasive Transhuman Agency?’ Perhaps a more detailed description of such paradigmatic biotechnical saturation, which is seldom (if ever) encountered in mainstream media – given the scrupulous censorship and criminalisation of dissent performed by the agencies promoting the further development of this technological stage – would illuminate its paradigmatic aptness. Referring to the brave whistleblower, bio-technical analyst Karen Kingston, Rhoda Wilson writes: 

Kingston is a biotech analyst with more than 20 years of experience. She has been reviewing research that has been conducted on Covid ‘vaccines’ over more than a decade. ‘I really want the truth to be understood and the evidence to be seen and evaluated,’ she told Adams.  So, during the interview, she discussed some of the patents she has found: in particular, quantum dots ‘because that’s the backbone technology and energy of this AI [artificial intelligence] bioweapon,’ she said. ‘It’s part biology and part technology…that’s always been the intention of Covid-19.’

Kingston’s work exposes the astonishing bio-technology that has gone into manufacturing the supposed coronavirus [not real] as well as the mRNA Covid ‘vaccines,’ which are no vaccines, but as she stresses, ‘bioweapons.’ Mike Adams, who conducted a revealing interview with Kingston, argues that what Kingston has brought to the attention of the public is anything but an unproven ‘conspiracy theory.’ On the contrary, all the elements of the ‘vaccines’ that she identified and discussed in the interview (including ‘magnetic hydrogels’ and ‘soft actuators’) are traceable in scientific literature.

More importantly, these have been assembled in the ‘vaccines,’ demonstrably with other than beneficial consequences. These elements are described in the scientific article reviews listed by Adams as having ‘properties of magnetic nanoparticles [which] enable their use as magnetomechanic remote actuators to control the behavior of the cells encapsulated within the hydrogels under the application of external magnetic fields,’ and ‘soft actuators with physical intelligence’ (respectively). 

Therefore, what Kingston has disclosed is that these ‘vaccine’-implanted ‘biosynthetic structures’ have the capacity to ‘transmit and receive digitized information, allowing such structures to “network” with each other, even as they reside inside host human bodies. Combined with external AI capabilities that are accelerated by 5G bandwidth speed and low latency, these networking structures can be weaponized against humanity.’ In the light of these disturbing revelations, Kingston has called for law enforcement to ‘seize all vaccine bioweapons in the USA,’ underscoring the seriousness of a situation caused by the development of nanoscale AI-‘bioweapons.’  

Nevertheless, despite her call, attempts to disseminate such bioweapons have continued, as she pointed out in a 2024 interview, where she commented on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ‘funding the creation of a highly debilitating immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that can be transmitted via an injection, or even via skin-to-skin contact during herpetic skin lesion breakouts.’ More importantly – and this bears directly on my claim regarding the present phase of technicity as ‘Pervasive Transhuman Agency,’ concretised in the paradigm of ‘the vaccinated human body’ – Kingston said that the aim of these NIH grants is to produce such a virus (as that mentioned above) ‘and aerosolise it, and also how can I make it make the entire immune system stand down so [the virus] can actually get into human cells.’

Needless to highlight, this marks another stage in the sustained effort to saturate or pervade spaces occupied by humans with optimally transmissible, aerosolisable biotechnical-chemical materials of highly suspicious and questionable nature.   

From the above it should be abundantly apparent that the ‘vaccines’ permeate the bodies of their unwitting and trusting ‘receivers’ (pun intended). This is not all, however; the pervasiveness is exacerbated by the following. While most people rejected allegations, sometime after the rollout of Covid ‘vaccinations,’ that the ‘vaccinated’ were ‘shedding’ the spike protein that the vax manufactured in their bodies on others, it has since been confirmed that this is indeed the case. Moreover, this process seems to be continuing, judging by environmental scientist and lab science director, Mike Adams’s claim, that the Moderna mRNA ‘flu shot,’ currently being promoted by the FDA, is no exception. He writes:

Calling mRNA shots ‘vaccines’ is a deliberate lie. My research tells me they are gene-based weapon delivery systems wrapped in lipid nanoparticles that trick your cells into accepting alien instructions. ‘Unlike traditional vaccines that deliver killed or weakened viruses, this new generation of shots contains synthetic genetic instructions that command the body’s own cells to become viral protein factories’.

This is straight out of the transhumanist playbook. As Elana Freeland documents in her book [Geoengineered Transhumanism], ‘The Registry of Standard Biological Parts is made up of Lego-like BioBricks, short pieces of synthetic DNA that send and receive signals, initiating the transcription of DNA into synthetic messenger RNA.’ Once inside, the mRNA hijacks your ribosomes, forcing them to churn out non-human spike proteins — toxins your body was never designed to produce.

Just how systematic and thoroughgoing this pervasive technological intervention regarding the human body has been may be gathered from the terrifying list of so-called side effects (which are really intended effects) of the Pfizer mRNA vax, supposedly against Covid-19. I have been able to trace two websites where these (which were supplied in response to a request under the ‘Freedom of Information Act’ in the US) were listed – ‘were,’ because the first one has since been removed, probably by the globalists. 

The second is still there, however, and is not a reassuring, albeit informative read. What it confirms is the fact that these effects are the outcome of the nanoscale components of the vax having the capacity to cause destructive effects, and could possibly even – in the light of Kingston’s disclosure concerning their ‘AI-bioweapon’ status – have ‘agency,’ insofar as these components are said to be able to ‘transmit and receive digitized information’ from an external source.   

Having succeeded in the ‘vaccination’ of billions of people worldwide – albeit fewer than had been aimed for – the process of saturation is continuing through the ‘shedding’ which occurs in the wake of every mRNA ‘vaccination.’ The sooner people realise this, the sooner this scourge can be defeated. Unless they can overcome the ‘cognitive dissonance’ evoked when anyone alerts them to the fact that millions of people have died of the vax, and millions will still die in the coming years, this relentless decimation of the population will continue. Yet, it is allowed to continue because of the reluctance on the part of most people to believe it. The consequences of gullible populations accepting the vax are there for everyone to see. 

To mention only one reliable source of information on the continuing mortality in question, consider the information emerging from insurance companies: 

Executives at the largest insurance companies in the United States say they are ‘alarmed’ at the ‘sudden surge’ in deaths among fully jabbed young people.

According to an Oct. 26 report in InsuranceNewsNet, U.S. insurance executives are worried about the crippling payouts they are being forced to make due to the unprecedented number of young, healthy adults dropping dead following the jab rollout…

Edward Dowd, the former BlackRock fund manager who oversaw $14 billion in assets on Wall Street for the largest asset manager in the world, exposed the excess-death crisis in insurance-industry data in his December 2022 book, “‘Cause Unknown:’ The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022”…

Dowd said he believes the COVID-19 vaccines are causing widespread, otherwise inexplicable, excess deaths. ‘We don’t have proof. It’s our thesis,’ he said. But ‘if you have a brain in your head,’ the data are persuasive, he said. ‘Obviously I think it’s the vaccines.’

I have elaborated somewhat on the correlation between the paradigmatic ‘vaccinated human body’ and observed, if not recorded mortality rates that can be ascribed to the widely administered (albeit not completely pervasive) vax, to emphasise that the current stage of technicity – Pervasive Transhuman Agency – is nothing inconsequential or innocuous. On the contrary; anyone who is sufficiently courageous to face the currently available evidence of the frightening toll that the vax has already exacted in the guise of destroyed human lives would have to confront scientific studies (published in reputable journals) such as the one where the following abstract is encountered:   

The CDC denies that COVID-19 injections from Pfizer, Moderna, or Novavax can cause magnetism, even at the site of the injection. The CDC claims that the three ferromagnetic metals consisting of iron, cobalt, and nickel, and the rare earth chemicals used in magnets cerium, hafnium, lanthanum, gadolinium, and erbium are not in the US approved injectables. However, a 2024 study using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), detected all these and many other undeclared elements in lots of Pfizer, Moderna, and five other brands of COVID-19 injectables. By contrast with the CDC denials, James Giordano, who has become Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), has argued since 2018 that the human brain is the battleground for DARPA’s ‘disruptive technologies’ of warfare using magnetic nanoparticles delivered ‘intranasally, intravenously, or intraorally’ all without surgery to achieve ‘mind-control’ by adjusting the frequencies, power, and directionality of the electromagnetic forces. The science of magnetofection is little known but has been under development for decades. We explain it here and ask, could militarized experimentation with magnetic nanoparticles be involved in causing the documented outcomes of proteinaceous clotting, cardio-vascular conditions, strokes, new autoimmune diseases, unprecedented rapidly developing ‘prion diseases,’ ‘turbo’ cancers, and sudden deaths many of these occurring in otherwise young and healthy recipients of the experimental COVID-19 injectables? The research discussed in this paper implies that an affirmative answer cannot be ruled out. 

Those people who are still in denial about the undeniable would find it extremely difficult to dismiss scientific findings such as the one quoted above, of which there are already a considerable number. (Perhaps it might help if they peruse the list of [side]effects of the Pfizer mRNA jab, referred to earlier.) One should not overlook the fact either, that these findings reinforce the argument in this article, that the new phase of technicity – which is aptly captured in the paradigms of ‘AI’ and particularly of ‘the vaccinated human body’ (which may be construed as subsuming ‘AI’ under its ambit) – is decisively characterised by the optimisation of Pervasive Transhuman Agency at several levels. This is graphically outlined in a disturbing article by Maryam Henein, where she writes:

The wireless future is here. The model ostensibly turns human beings, via nano-implants, into antennas that can transmit information. They’re turning human beings into quasi-machines. Under this transhumanist agenda, the idea is to place nanotech inside our bodies [so that] we can communicate in real-time with the Smart Grid powered by way of  5G…

It’s called the ‘internet of bodies’ (IoB) or the ‘nanotech of things,’ (NToT), and it connects with the Internet of Things (IOT). One way this is accomplished is to embed graphene-made sensors into fabrics. Another is to implant or ingest the nanotech matter into the body, creating an internal technology platform…

While globalists aim to vaccinate the world and watch as our fellow man turns into ‘Magneto Man,’ evidence indicates that Big Harma, aided and abetted by VERY sick Rockefeller hospitals, are injecting us with nanoparticles meant to respond to signals while – oops – changing our very nature and DNA…   

Henein’s article confirms what one learns from Karen Kingston, referred to earlier, and the information one gleans from her work further suggests that, far from being a ‘conspiracy theory,’ it contributes to the noticeably growing phenomenon of ‘conspiracy realism.’ Given the signs that a new, arguably more devastating kind of technology (technicity) than the kind he was familiar with is in the process of asserting itself pervasively today, it seems safe to say that, had Heidegger been alive today, he would undoubtedly have reiterated his portentous remark: ‘Only a god can save us.’  

Image: Source [Edited]

Original Article: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-vaccinated-human-body/

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“It is Inconceivable that those with power and wealth would not band together with a common bond, a common interest, and a long-range plan to decide and direct the future of the world.” ~ Milton William (Bill) Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse

It should be obvious by now that nations and countries worldwide are working together as one [always have been], even as they pretend to be enemies, which indicates that nefarious theatre is alive and present. If this could be known and accepted by large numbers of the sheep-like populace, attitudes would change, and physical defensive action would necessarily be forthcoming, but the near impossibility of convincing the herd of the truth is an enormous impediment to this knowledge becoming more universal. For truth to be accepted by the brainwashed ignoramuses, ego must first be expelled.

Those known as the ‘people,’ the lower classes of serfs who make up the bulk of societies, are kept busy watching the games, participating in the bread and circus environment, concentrating on the minutia and daily ‘news’ cycles, while avoiding entirely the big picture; looking at everything presented by the State without ever once looking behind the curtain of secrecy. This fact in and of itself, is reason to believe that true revolution, any real awakening, any legitimate negation of rule, will likely never take place by any competent large-scale minority, and certainly not by any majority made up of indoctrinated fools.

Discussions about a one world government, a new world order, a globalized ruling force, have for decades been ignored and written off as ‘conspiracy theory.’ Now, this is being openly and freely exposed by the entirety of the ruling class, so boldly presented, and professed to be the way to equality and prosperity, that it is nearly impossible not to see that this was the plan all along. Those who dismissed the warnings, and avoided what was happening over the past few decades, are now once again not accepting that they were wrong and lied to, but are also going along voluntarily with the plan to forever enslave them. This is very disheartening, because even though all those who predicted this outcome were correct, they are still being ignored as the proletariat hordes are willingly walking into their cages and closing the door behind them without so much as a whimper. Apparently, no lessons have been learned.

This brings us to the crux of the matter. The entirety of the real ruling element of this earth works together as one. This is not something that will happen; it has already happened. The final stages of this transformation of global (one world) rule are not complete, but certainly getting closer to fruition every day. Once the veil was lifted, once the agenda was admitted, once world ‘leaders’ openly promoted this system, the question of the existence of this global takeover plot became indisputable. When humanity has reached a position of near total ignorance, when logic and reasoning have failed to be evident, when dependence has become near universal, nothing has to be hidden any longer, as the lemmings have resigned themselves to their respective mental cages. These cages prohibit the ability to think critically, and therefore societies devolve into slave camps.

Before going further, it is important to grasp the reality of this discussion. One example of many is all that is necessary for any thinking human being to understand the scope of this conspiratorial one world system. That one example is the hoax called ‘covid.’ The fake ‘covid pandemic’ began a mere 7 years ago. What happened was astounding, but would have been impossible unless the controllers of most every country on earth were complicit, working together, and fully aware of the plot long in advance. Of the 200 or so countries in the world, most every single one introduced, implemented, and enforced some form of lockdown, restrictive measures of movement, forced testing, ‘vaccine’ mandates, among many other restrictions, and did so simultaneously. How could that have happened without total collusion among all countries at one level or another? I can tell you that it could not under any circumstances have happened organically, and would have been impossible. It was all a set-up, a global complicit conspiracy, all premeditated, and structured to force the installation of a universal, one world, technocratic prison for humanity. It was simply a test, and was completely successful for the few who run and control the entire world.

Even now as I write this, countries around the world are all on the same page and implementing the same restrictive measures and surveillance structures, whether in Russia, China, Asia, Europe, the U.K., Canada, Australia, South America, Mexico, Central America, Israel, the Middle East, of course the U.S., and many more. The buildout of bad AI (as opposed to good AI) biometrics, mass surveillance, travel restrictions, digitized currency, truth ministries and control of speech, monstrous data centers, destruction of food and energy sources, and on and on. When more lockdowns, ‘health’ mandates, forced ‘vaccines’, 24/7 monitoring, quarantines, and border restrictions surface, all countries will be on board as one. This is truly a one world system in the making, with near universal collusion certainly evident now. This is not being hidden, and anyone with eyes can see this real conspiracy.

There is an ‘elite’ ruling class made up of esoteric occultists who rule the world. They do not do this openly, but in the deep shadows, and they do not do it alone, as most all of humanity has succumbed to a top-down ruling structure. The hierarchy involves the big banking conglomerates, the major corporate players, the entirety of politicians and political systems, and all the enforcers in government and military. The political class in the country is but a conduit to the people, so when the masses support this government, they are actually supporting the ruling system that controls the government. That support is in essence nothing more than a road to serfdom, where the bulk of humanity will be enslaved physically, mentally, and psychologically.

In order to complete the plotted takeover of world governance, to build a fully technocratic ruling system, and to capture humanity so as to encourage them to act as one, and call for complete globalization, a master plan to bring mass cohesion about, will need a solidifying event. As I see it now, that event could be a staged (fake) attack by an outside alien force against the earth. Considering  the advanced stage of technology, the constant barrage of UFO and alien presence reporting, the release of so-called UFO files by Trump’s White House, this is no longer science fiction. While this may sound far-fetched, Trump recently stated: 

“I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant departments and agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOS), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important matters.”

Bill Cooper discussed this possibility 35 years ago, as a claimed attack from alien forces against the entire world, would immediately bring all the common masses together. No other single event I can think of, would have quite that effect. Of course, the threat of a worldwide plague, but that has already been done with the ‘covid’ scam. It could be a threat of an earth-destroying asteroid strike, but what would happen when it did not occur? A military-led fake alien attack could be used to actually kill people everywhere, thereby causing depopulation and a global clamoring for a unified world, both agenda fulfilling events.

No, I have not lost my mind or gone into any state of dementia, but considering this world today, anything is possible concerning the completion of a one world government and a new world order. Regardless, we are headed for hell if the common people do not wake up soon, and realize the threat they are under from the technocratic ruling whores looking down on them.

“There is coming a day, when freedom will just be a essence of the mind, an inner dwelling that was once physically attainable. They will tell you where you can live, and what you can wear and drive, what and how much you can eat and drink, and how to purchase those. They will strip you of your religion, race, gender, national origin, age, color, creed, views and power, and have control of the population. They will set in a new world order, and put you in the back of the line, marked and branded. Everything before will be erased, and the new will be manipulated. And what you believe most, can only be kept secret, for all must fall in line of their govern. Anything outside will be abolished. Even death, will be sought, but restrained. They will execute complete and total control over everything, and be sole owners of your soul. The light, that once guided will go dim, and liberty will be like an unwilled bird, suppressed in the cage of your ribs; wings cut off.” ~ Anthony Liccione

Image: Source [Edited]

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-world-is-no-longer-made-up-of-independent-nations-as-globalization-is-sought/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Locals keep dancing, jogging and giving tours in BURNING Paris while Macron hits a Celine Dion concert

This Is Perhaps The Most Dystopian Thing Ever…

Steve Watson | modernity.news

France’s streets burned, shops were looted and stripped bare and a historic town hall collapsed under arson. Yet the most striking images from Saturday night were not the fires. They were the people who carried on as if nothing was happening.

One woman jogged straight through thick black smoke past a burning barricade, treating the chaos like an outdoor treadmill session.

Groups of French boomers kept dancing while buildings were torched around them, and a tour guide was filmed continuing her routine for visitors, smiling and pointing out landmarks while flames literally engulfed the city right in front of tourists.

Meanwhile, the so called leader of France President Emmanuel Macron was filmed at a Celine Dion concert.

This is the backdrop to the worst night of rioting and unrest in years. Authorities reported roughly 550,000 people on the streets (others claimed 800,000). The day produced between 1,200 and 1,800 arrests and more than 500 injured police, gendarmes and firefighters. One person died of cardiac arrest in Paris.

In Limoges the 143-year-old city hall was deliberately set alight; its spire and roof collapsed. Prefect Maurice Barate called the attackers “a wild horde.”

Mayor Guillaume Guérin said those who entered threatened staff, telling them they would be killed. The building had survived two world wars.

In Lyon the tourist office, described as a heritage building in the heart of the city, was set ablaze, with officials calling the loss a tragedy.

Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said the government would not be “intimidated” and blamed the “ultra-left” and criminals. Interior Minister Laurent Nunez pointed to “far-left” protesters joined by “criminals who looted and ransacked.”

Paris Deputy Mayor Emmanuel Gregoire stated that “whole streets have been devastated.” Macron, while still claiming there were legitimate protesters who should not be ignored, later said those who broke into buildings, attacked prefectures and looted town halls “will be prosecuted and punished.”

In Marseille, rioters forced their way into city hall, toppled a bust of Marianne and raised Palestinian flags.

Rolex, Hermès, Louis Vuitton and other stores were emptied in daylight.

Looters also broke into the Centre Bourse shopping mall and began taking everything they could carry.

Prefect Jacques Witkowski said the people involved “ne sont pas venus pour manifester, mais piller” — they did not come to demonstrate, they came to loot.

In Paris a woman who had joined the marches was filmed shouting “This isn’t the cause” as others began looting; she was pushed aside and told they had “urgent shopping” to do.

Restaurant owner Aline of La Barrique was beaten, her face bruised, her place sacked and burned.

A phone-shop owner sat among the shattered remains of his business.

In Nice a person connected to an attacked store was assaulted after confronting the rioters.

Groups also hijacked tourist train cars.

Another clip shows supposed student protesters pausing to loot a jewellery store.

Footage of the looting and street chaos has been widely shared as the direct outcome of left-wing policies and education that prioritised ideology over basic order.

Footage from multiple cities shows few French flags among the most violent crowds. Islamic and Palestinian flags dominate.

One clip shows men pausing the looting and violence in a Paris street to pray, then continuing.

A Spanish journalist was confronted by two men making throat-slitting gestures; reports described them as second- and third-generation migrants.

An image of a Joan of Arc figure in a hijab holding a Palestinian flag circulated widely.

A circulating account from journalist Paul Amar claimed groups arrived with addresses of town halls and Jewish-owned shops and that, on one Marseille street, businesses owned by Jews were burned while those run by Muslims were not.

Organised Networks, Not Spontaneous Students

This is not a spontaneous student protest that got out of hand.

A Fox News Digital investigation found that of roughly 50 organisations active around the unrest, only about one-third were actual student or youth groups. The rest included labour unions, communist and socialist organisations, the French Communist Party, La France Insoumise and a Palestinian advocacy group.

The same reporting traced funding and amplification to networks linked to Shanghai-based tycoon Neville Roy Singham, including outlets such as BreakThrough News.

The violence is being amplified by a red-green alliance of communists, socialists and Islamists using “student” grievances as cover for broader disruption.

A clip circulating on X shows pallets of bottles appearing on the street as if staged in advance, suggesting the chaos was organised and rioters were being equipped rather than acting spontaneously.

The original complaints about teacher shortages and ageing school buildings are now just a footnote.

France spends above the EU average on upper-secondary education. None of that explains why luxury stores were emptied, why a 19th-century town hall was torched, why people are being beaten in the streets or their own places of business, or why large sections of the crowds waved foreign flags and paused to pray in the street.

The media continues to centre “education reform” and cost-of-living framing. The videos show something else entirely: organised destruction enabled by decades of open borders, with first-, second- and third-generation migrants doing the smashing and burning.

While the country was being looted and set alight, people danced, jogged through the smoke, gave guided tours and the president attended a concert. That is the clearest picture of how detached the official story has become from what is actually happening on the ground.

Image: Source [Truth11.com Meme Ghibli Styled Using ChatGTP]

Original Article: https://modernity.news/2026/10/18/this-is-perhaps-the-most-dystopian-thing-ever/

Islamic supremacists are attacking those who threw their borders open to them.

n Terresa Monroe-Hamilton | RairFoundation.com

Revolution is spreading across Europe as communists and Muslim thugs get their violence on. Italy is now on fire just as France is as guerilla warfare explodes in the shadow of a Gothic Christian cathedral. The Arab Spring was the beginning – welcome to the second act.

As predicted, the violent Red/Green Alliance protests have spread from France to Belgium, Albania, Switzerland, Portugal, India, and now Italy. It will get worse as the chaos engulfs Europe. Outside Milan’s magnificent Duomo Cathedral, fire blazed under the spires as protesters waved Palestinian and Antifa flags and got their violence on. That cathedral was not chosen by accident… it is a symbol of Christianity and one of the world’s great Gothic cathedrals. If they get the chance, the godless communists and Islamic thugs will burn it to the ground.

Islamic Revolution in the Shadow of a Christian Cathedral

On Saturday, police clashed with the rioters dressed like Black Bloc and wearing keffiyehs as stores shut down and tourists ran for cover. Smoke filled the square. Onlookers were horrified as the destruction took place in one of the most historically rich places on Earth, which became a revolutionary battle zone.

Muslim migrants and Antifa rioters attacked the police, hurling paper bombs, stones, Molotov cocktails, and firecrackers. They trashed cars and threw smoke bombs at rooftop bars. British visitors were terrified and said they had never seen anything like it or felt less safe as they fled to nearby airports.

This revolt is just clearing its throat. Remember the Arab Spring? Welcome to the second act. Islamic supremacists are attacking those who threw their borders open to them. If you invite the vampire in, you can’t be surprised when he decides to dine on you. Demons are predictable like that.

The Associated Press reported 50 demonstrators, including minors, were detained and at least two police officers were hurt. Italy’s public news wire service Ansa reported police detained 197 people during the demonstration, while 28 were arrested, including 12 minors and six foreign nationals. The wire service noted that there was also a heavy contingent of “second-generation migrants” involved in the riots. Those are Muslims.

Police used water cannons to disperse the crowd as rioters looted stores and broke windows inside Milan’s Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II, one of Italy’s most famous 19th-century arcades.

Roughly 5,000 protesters took part in the demonstration in Milan. While some demonstrators literally chanted in French, the protest quickly devolved into “guerrilla warfare,” Ansa reported.

“Milan was reduced to a battlefield, with Piazza Duomo besieged by hundreds of young people dressed in black. They forced the police to retreat under the hurling of firecrackers, barriers, and bottles, until they occupied the city’s symbolic square,” the wire service said.

Naming the Enemy

As France exploded, Italy was set ablaze as well. Just as in France, Italian politicians blamed the extreme left for the lawlessness. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni took to social media to condemn the unrest and back law enforcement.

Which she should do – but again, if you can’t name your enemy, you can’t defeat them. They are avoiding saying that Muslims and communists are the instigators here, just as France is doing. The only difference is that Meloni didn’t pull a Macron and attend a Celine Dion concert while her country burned.

“Once again, the women and men of the Law Enforcement Forces have had to face the violence of criminals who, even through organized groups, exploit demonstrations to seek confrontation and sow chaos,” Meloni posted on X.

“Because they were there to safeguard the safety of citizens, workers, merchants and all the people who have the right to live [in] their city without fear and without seeing it laid to waste and set ablaze by gangs of thugs,” she added. “We stand with you.”

“Thugs who exploit demonstrations to sow chaos, attack those who ensure security and hold entire cities hostage… Demonstrating is a right. Setting our cities ablaze is not,” Meloni said Saturday night, according to Fox News.

“I renew my request to the opposition: do not be ambiguous about this. Unequivocally condemn these acts of violence and issue a clear appeal for every mobilization to be peaceful,” she said to her political opponents.

Guerrilla Warfare

The Il Giornale newspaper accused Milan Mayor Giuseppe Sala and his Green Party-led coalition of having “fomented” the riots: “Dear Sala, mayor of Youth and Islamists, apologize to the Milanese for the guerrilla war in the city,” the paper demanded.

“It is no longer tolerable that every time left-wing extremists take to the streets, scenes of organized destruction unfold. We are not dealing with mere demonstrators, but with organized groups that plan violence,” Francesco Filini, MP for Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia and national program coordinator, stated according to the Il Sole 24 news site.

The Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro, or CGIL, Italy’s oldest labor union with over 5 million members, organized Saturday’s violent festivities. That communist union is linked to Italian political parties on the left.

Weakness is Contagious

Meloni, just like Macron, is coming across as weak. She posted that she had “great respect for the thousands” who protested peacefully and called participation “the foundation of any healthy democracy… we cannot ignore what happened in other Italian squares.”

You can’t placate communists and Islamic thugs this way. They will tear Italy apart. See France. These politicos never, ever learn. None of these people know a thing about history or revolution, but they are about to find out the hard way.

Meloni went on to note that in Milan “stones were thrown at the Law Enforcement Forces, officers were injured, damage and violence occurred that forced the interruption of the procession. In Turin, people were stopped carrying cobblestones and window-breaking hammers. In Bologna, the disorders led to the precautionary closure of the railway station.”

“In the face of scenes like these, the rejection must be unanimous,” Meloni wrote. “Any hesitation becomes justification. Silence is not acceptable.”

Neither is weakness or bending the knee to Islam.

“The reasons for the protests were understandable. The violence against law enforcement and serious damage to the city are not justifiable,” Milan’s center-left mayor, Giuseppe Sala, told the Associated Press.

He’s got that exactly wrong. There is no justification for these protests – the excuse of economics and education is being used as a façade for revolution. That permissive equivocating attitude is the death knell of Europe.

Reuters reported that approximately 56 police officers were injured in the protest in Bologna, citing the police union. The interior ministry says about 100 officers were hurt and around 30 arrests were made in the demonstration in Turin.

This is just the opening act. The Red/Green Alliance in Europe smells weakness, and they are moving in for the kill. Looks like those who hoped the alligator would eat them last are about to become the main course.

Original Article: https://rairfoundation.com/european-revolution-spreads-muslim-migrants-antifa-rioters-set/

Related:

John and Nisha Whitehead | Rutherford.org | The Rutherford Institute

“You see them on the street. You watch them on TV. You might even vote for one this fall. You think they’re people just like you. You’re wrong. Dead wrong.” — They Live

The spectacle of public executions. Deadly military strikes on foreign countries. Innocent civilian lives lost to war. Aggressive ICE raids. Government officials accused of using their powers to intimidate political opponents. Public office increasingly entangled with private financial interests.  Government leaders who glorify violence, spew hatred, stir up racial prejudice, provoke civil unrest, and stoke discontent.

This is what it looks like when a nation loses its way.

When cruelty is mistaken for courage, vengeance for justice, and the taking of human life for a demonstration of strength.

When government officials tell you not to believe your own eyes and ears about the state of the world around you, when they insist that the truth is a lie and the lie is truth, you’ve stumbled into a dystopian reality in which, as John Lennon rightly concluded, the government is “being run by maniacs for maniacal ends.”

When so-called Christians and self-professed defenders of morality insist that we must accept the lesser of two evils based on exaggerated fears of what might happen if their political opponents gain power, rather than confront the abuses unfolding before our eyes, remember this: the lesser of two evils is still evil.

This is not simply about Donald Trump.

The machinery of the American police state has been assembled over decades, under Republican and Democratic administrations alike. Presidents have expanded executive authority, waged undeclared wars, authorized drone killings, built surveillance networks, militarized domestic policing, and invoked national security to justify extraordinary powers.

What makes the present moment so troubling is the extent to which the public is encouraged to accept increasingly aggressive exercises of government power as necessary demonstrations of strength and resolve.

The Constitution was never intended to protect only the innocent, the popular, the patriotic, or the politically acceptable. Its restraints on government power matter most when the government is dealing with people whom society has already condemned.

Yet what happens when the public becomes so accustomed to government overreach, corruption and brutality that it no longer recognizes them as warning signs? What becomes of a constitutional republic when its leaders and citizens stop asking whether government actions are lawful, justified or necessary, and concern themselves only with whether those actions punish their enemies, advance their political interests or preserve their sense of security?

We are witnessing a political culture in which demanding due process for an accused criminal is treated as defending criminality, questioning a military strike is equated with sympathy for the enemy, and opposing government cruelty is portrayed as weakness.

The government doesn’t have to abolish the Constitution outright when it can persuade the public that certain people should no longer be entitled to its protections.

That is how constitutional rights cease to be rights at all and become privileges granted or withdrawn at the government’s discretion.

And that is how a population becomes conditioned to accept the unacceptable.

We’re living in two worlds.

There’s the world we see—or are made to see—and then there’s the one we sense and occasionally catch a glimpse of, which bears little resemblance to the propaganda-driven reality manufactured by those in power and amplified through an increasingly fragmented media landscape.

Indeed, what most Americans perceive as life in America—privileged, progressive and free—is a far cry from the reality of a nation where economic inequality persists, government power continues to expand, and freedom is increasingly subjected to the demands of surveillance, security and control.

All is not as it seems.

Monsters with human faces walk among us.

Some of them wield extraordinary government power.

This is the premise of John Carpenter’s film They Live, released in November 1988, which remains unnervingly, chillingly appropriate for our modern age.

Best known for his horror film Halloween, Carpenter’s larger body of work is infused with a strong anti-authoritarian, anti-establishment, laconic bent that speaks to the filmmaker’s concerns about the unraveling of our society, particularly our government.

Time and again, Carpenter portrays the government working against its own citizens, a populace out of touch with reality, technology run amok, and a future more horrific than any horror film.

In They Live, two migrant workers discover that the world is being subliminally controlled and exploited by aliens working in partnership with an oligarchic elite.

All the while, the populace—blissfully unaware of the real agenda at work in their lives—has been lulled into complacency, indoctrinated into compliance, bombarded with media distractions, and hypnotized by hidden messages beamed out of television and various electronic devices, billboards and the like.

Sound familiar?

It is only when homeless drifter John Nada, played by the late Roddy Piper, discovers a pair of special sunglasses that he sees what lies beneath the elite’s fabricated reality: control and bondage.

When viewed through Nada’s lenses, the wealthy and powerful who appear human are revealed as monsters exploiting the citizenry.

Likewise, seemingly mundane advertisements conceal subliminal, authoritarian messages. Magazine racks scream “CONSUME” and “OBEY.” Money proclaims “THIS IS YOUR GOD.” Other hidden messages reinforce the same demands: CONFORM. SUBMIT. STAY ASLEEP. WATCH TV. DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY. NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT.

This indoctrination campaign engineered by the elite in They Live is painfully familiar to anyone who has studied the workings of an authoritarian state.

A citizenry that does not think for themselves, obeys without question, is submissive, does not challenge authority, does not think outside the box, and is content to sit back and be entertained is a citizenry that can be easily controlled.

In this way, the message of They Live provides an apt analogy for the distorted vision of life in the American police state—what philosopher Slavoj Žižek has characterized as the invisible structures of domination that sustain the appearance of freedom.

Tune out the government’s attempts to distract, divert and befuddle us and tune into what’s really going on in this country, and you’ll run headlong into an uncomfortable truth: government corruption and power have expanded far beyond the restraints the Constitution was intended to impose.

And the corruption is not always hidden.

What happens when public office, private wealth and political influence become so intertwined that ordinary citizens can no longer distinguish whose interests their government is serving? What happens when those conflicts are repeatedly exposed, yet the public becomes too distracted, too divided or too politically invested to demand answers?

This is where the warning of They Live becomes especially relevant.

The danger is not simply that powerful interests might conceal what they’re doing. It’s that they can operate in plain sight, confident that enough people will refuse to see—or refuse to care.

We have allowed the government’s corruption, brutality, self-dealing and abuses go on for too long. While this has been true of both parties, it has become painfully evident under the Trump administration.

Desperate to hold onto power, the powers-that-be continue to advance a series of carefully contrived narratives, threats and emergencies to justify expanding their authority, encouraging the public to fear one another, distrust our own judgment, and accept increasingly invasive government powers as the price of safety.

Fear is the great enabler of authoritarianism.

Fear of terrorists. Fear of criminals. Fear of immigrants. Fear of foreign enemies. Fear of domestic extremists. Fear of one another.

Every new threat becomes another justification for expanding government authority, weakening constitutional safeguards, and demanding greater obedience from a frightened public.

This is how government power expands in plain sight. The targets are portrayed as threats. The government’s actions are defended as necessary. Those who question its methods are accused of defending criminals, undermining public safety or siding with the enemy.

And with every exception made to constitutional restraints, the public becomes a little more accustomed to powers it once would have considered intolerable. Surveillance becomes security. Censorship becomes protection. Militarized policing becomes public safety. Indefinite detention becomes national defense.

And killing becomes justice.

For too long, Americans have been persuaded to barter their freedoms for promises of security, rationalizing government wrongdoing because they are told the alternatives would be worse.

But no matter how you rationalize it, the lesser of two evils is still evil.

The greatest danger is not merely that government officials may abuse their power.

It is that ordinary people may become so accustomed to those abuses that they lose the ability—or the willingness—to recognize them for what they are.

This brings us back to They Live, in which the danger posed is not simply the alien conspiracy but the population’s willingness to remain asleep and controlled.

Again, not so different from our own.

As one of the characters points out, “The poor and the underclass are growing. Racial justice and human rights are nonexistent. They have created a repressive society and we are their unwitting accomplices. Their intention to rule rests with the annihilation of consciousness. We have been lulled into a trance. They have made us indifferent to ourselves, to others. We are focused only on our own gain.”

We, too, are encouraged to focus on our own pleasures, prejudices and political victories, while remaining indifferent to the suffering of others. Our poor and underclasses are also growing. Injustice is growing. Inequality is growing. A concern for human rights is nearly nonexistent. We too have been lulled into a trance, indifferent to others.

The government doesn’t have to convince everyone that its actions are lawful, just or humane. It merely has to persuade enough people that those being targeted deserve whatever happens to them.

Nor does corruption have to be concealed when it can be rationalized, dismissed, or excused as the unavoidable cost of keeping one’s preferred political leaders in power.

This is perhaps the most disturbing parallel to They Live: a population that has been shown what is happening, yet remains unwilling to confront the implications.

The warning signs are no longer buried beneath elaborate disguises. They are unfolding in courtrooms, detention facilities, government offices, financial disclosures and daily news reports.

And still, too many people choose to look away.

We can convince ourselves that we are different from the victims of government abuse. That we are too law-abiding, too patriotic, too respectable, too insignificant to become targets ourselves.

We can tell ourselves that the government means well, that extraordinary measures are necessary, and that those caught in the machinery of state power must have done something to deserve their fate. But every exception made to someone else’s rights weakens the protections intended to safeguard our own.

That was the warning behind the Bill of Rights.

The founders understood that government officials could not be trusted to restrain themselves simply because they professed good intentions. The Constitution was intended to bind government power, not magnify it.

So where does that leave us?

The characters who populate Carpenter’s films provide some insight.

Underneath their machismo, they still believe in the ideals of liberty and equal opportunity. Their beliefs place them in constant opposition with the law and the establishment, but they are nonetheless freedom fighters.

When John Nada destroys the alien hypno-transmitter in They Live, he delivers a wake-up call for freedom. As Nada memorably declares, “I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I’m all out of bubblegum.”

In other words, it’s time to get active and take a stand for what’s really important.

Stop allowing yourselves to be easily distracted by political spectacles and manufactured fears. Stop treating constitutional rights as privileges reserved for people you agree with. Stop excusing government abuses merely because the victims are unpopular or the perpetrators share your political loyalties.

As we make clear in Battlefield America: The War on the American People and its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, all the trappings of the American police state are now in plain sight.

The greatest danger is not that the monsters have become so adept at hiding among us. It is that we have become so conditioned to their presence, so accustomed to their abuses, and so willing to excuse their corruption that we no longer recognize them for what they are.

Wake up, America.

If they live—the tyrants, the oppressors, the invaders, the overlords—it is only because “we the people” sleep.

Original Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_politics_of_denial

John and Nisha Whitehead | Rutherford.org | The Rutherford Institute

“United States AI companies must be free to innovate without cumbersome regulation.”—President Donald Trump, Executive Order 14365

The era of small government is over.

Anyone who tells you differently is selling you a lie.

Case in point: Donald Trump promised to shrink the federal government.

But what if Trump’s pledge to cut the federal work force wasn’t really about eliminating government bureaucracy but outsourcing it to the AI tech sector?

What if Trump, with the backing of a self-serving industry eager to automate government, is instead helping to build a government that no longer needs as many human beings to operate it?

Hundreds of thousands of federal workers are disappearing from the government payroll at the same time that Washington is racing to automate the work they once performed with artificial intelligence.

Since Trump returned to office, the federal workforce has shrunk by more than 270,000 employees, the result of hiring freezes, deferred resignations, early retirements and reductions in force.

At the same time, the Trump administration has embraced an aggressive campaign to automate government operations, with the General Services Administration instructing agencies to “eliminate, optimize and automate“ their work wherever possible.

This is not a return to smaller government.

It is a dangerous recalibration of government power.

What we are watching unfold is the construction of a government that requires fewer human beings to carry out its will, fewer human beings to question its orders, and fewer human beings to stand in the way when efficiency collides with legality, morality or constitutional restraint.

That is the real danger of automating government.

Human beings hesitate. Human beings question. Human beings object. Human beings refuse. Human beings blow the whistle.

Machines do not hesitate. They do not object. They do not blow the whistle.

For the most part, machines do what they are programmed to do. Until they don’t.

For an administration increasingly impatient with legal restraints, institutional resistance and anyone who says “no,” that is not merely a technological convenience.

It is an authoritarian temptation.

Anyone who believes smaller government means less government power needs to think again, because a government run by machines is still government.

Likewise, a government without bureaucrats is not necessarily a government without bureaucracy.

It may simply be bureaucracy without human beings.

And bureaucracy without human beings may prove far more powerful, pervasive and difficult to restrain than anything that came before it.

What is taking shape is a government that may employ fewer human beings while possessing exponentially greater power to surveil, process, classify, investigate and control the population.

Indeed, the administration has now launched America.gov, an AI-powered centralized digital gateway through which Americans will eventually interact with federal agencies and complete government transactions. The White House boasts that it will allow the federal government to “do its own paperwork.”

AI can certainly reduce backlogs, simplify forms, process information and free workers from tedious tasks.

Certainly, artificial intelligence can help eliminate repetitive paperwork, reduce backlogs, identify waste, simplify complicated forms, translate government jargon into plain English, process enormous amounts of information and free human workers from tedious tasks.

The concern is not whether AI can be useful.

It can.

The danger begins when AI stops assisting human beings and starts replacing them—not merely as clerks but as decision-makers, investigators, gatekeepers, analysts and enforcers of government power.

Thus, the concern is not the technology itself but what happens when government begins using it to eliminate the human restraints that constitutional government depends upon.

We are rapidly moving from a society ruled by laws and due process to one ruled increasingly by software.

In such a regime, the law is no longer merely interpreted. It is executed. Automatically. Mechanically. At machine speed.

The result is a system in which government no longer governs. It processes.

Your application. Your tax return. Your disability claim. Your immigration status. Your face. Your movements. Your associations. Your financial transactions. Your government records request. Your threat profile.

Perhaps eventually your guilt or innocence.

And, if some military planners have their way, whether you qualify as a target.

This is where the supposed efficiency of artificial intelligence collides head-on with the Constitution.

Government is not a private corporation. Its purpose is not merely to become faster, cheaper or more productive. Government possesses powers that no corporation possesses. It can tax you. Search you. Arrest you. Imprison you. Seize your property. Monitor you. Restrict your liberty. And in extreme circumstances, take your life.

And in extreme circumstances, take your life.

When government exercises those powers, efficiency cannot be the highest value. Liberty must be.

Due process is inefficient. Search warrants are inefficient. Trials are inefficient. Appeals are inefficient. Human review is inefficient. Checks and balances are spectacularly inefficient.

They are supposed to be.

The Constitution deliberately places obstacles between government power and the individual.

Before the police may search your home, they generally need a warrant. Before the government may imprison you, it must give you an opportunity to challenge the accusations. Government power is deliberately divided so that one branch can restrain another.

All of that takes time.

All of that requires human beings.

All of that frustrates officials who would prefer to simply get things done.

Yet those safeguards are among the things standing between a free people and a government that can act instantly, universally and without meaningful resistance.

Artificial intelligence promises to cut through the delays, obstacles and human steps that slow government down.

That is marvelous if you’re trying to schedule an appointment. It is terrifying when the government is making decisions about your liberty—or your life.

For generations, government power was also constrained by manpower. There were only so many investigators, analysts and bureaucrats—and only so many hours in a day.

AI changes that equation.

By doing what the police state has historically lacked the manpower and resources to do quickly, AI surveillance is already reorienting our world into one in which freedom is increasingly difficult to recognize: it can be everywhere, watch everyone and everything, monitor, identify, catalogue, cross-check, cross-reference and collate enormous quantities of information.

The surveillance state no longer needs enough people to watch everyone. It needs enough computing power.

That distinction matters.

A human investigator can follow only so many people. An algorithm can analyze millions. A bureaucrat can make only so many decisions in a day. A machine can make millions without sleeping, hesitating or developing a conscience.

That allows government power—and government abuse—to operate on a scale the Founders could scarcely have imagined.

It also creates an enormous accountability problem.

For decades, critics of the administrative state have warned about unelected bureaucrats wielding excessive government power.

Replacing the bureaucrat with an algorithm does not solve that problem. It may make it worse.

At least the bureaucrat has a name. A human being can be questioned. A supervisor can At least the bureaucrat has a name. A human being can be questioned. A supervisor can intervene. An employee can refuse an unlawful order. A whistleblower can expose misconduct. Someone can be held responsible.

But what happens when government responds, in effect, that the computer made the decision? Who do you cross-examine? Who explains the reasoning? Who takes responsibility for the mistake? Who possesses the authority to override the machine? And what happens when the algorithm itself belongs not to the government but to a private corporation whose code, training data and internal workings are shielded from public scrutiny?

The government’s dependence on private technology companies only compounds the problem.

Government power remains government power, but accountability becomes privatized.

We are already seeing glimpses of this future.

Federal agencies are already experimenting with AI to review Freedom of Information Act requests and recommend which portions of government records should be withheld from the public. Customs and Border Protection is testing AI-assisted redaction tools, while other agencies are developing similar systems. Human reviewers are still involved, but the trajectory is unmistakable: tasks requiring judgment about what the public may know are increasingly becoming candidates for automation.

The stakes become far greater once AI moves from paperwork to policing and warfare.

Earlier this year, the Pentagon clashed with Anthropic, the company behind the Claude AI system, after Anthropic insisted on maintaining restrictions against two uses of its technology: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

Anthropic warned that present AI systems are not reliable enough to independently decide when weapons should fire and argued that AI-powered mass surveillance could allow government to piece together enormous quantities of otherwise scattered information about Americans at unprecedented scale.

The Pentagon responded by designating Anthropic a supply-chain risk, a decision that has since become the subject of litigation.

The dispute should concern anyone who cares about the limits of government power.

The issue was not whether artificial intelligence could assist military personnel.

It was whether there must always remain a human being responsible for certain decisions.

That question became even more urgent in September, when the United States and Russia opposed provisions under discussion at the United Nations that would have required human review of AI-generated military targets and imposed stronger requirements concerning the predictability and reliability of autonomous weapons systems.

The consequences of that rush toward machine-speed warfare are no longer hypothetical.

In February, U.S. missiles struck the Shajarah Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab, Iran, killing more than 150 people, including at least 120 children.

The school had once been part of a military compound, but it had been operating openly as a school for years. Yet outdated intelligence still classified the site as a military target.

According to reporting on the Pentagon’s internal investigation, the flawed target was fed into Maven, the military’s AI-assisted targeting system. Officials reportedly relied too heavily on the technology to identify stale or contradictory intelligence while an accelerated targeting process compressed work that once took hours into minutes. At the same time, civilian-harm mitigation teams had been dramatically reduced.

The machine did not simply wake up one morning and decide to bomb a school. Human beings built a system that placed a premium on speed, automation and scale—and then gave it priority over human judgment and careful vetting.

That distinction matters. It is also precisely the danger.

Think about the progression: First AI does the paperwork. Then AI recommends the decision. Then AI makes the decision.

Eventually AI decides who lives and who dies.

At each step, humans remain tempted to surrender a little more judgment to the machine because it is faster, cheaper, more efficient and supposedly more objective.

Yet technology does not eliminate human bias, political agendas or government misconduct.

It can automate them. It can amplify them. It can conceal them behind a technological black box. And it can reproduce them millions of times before anyone realizes what has happened.

This is why assurances that AI companies can largely police themselves should provide little comfort.

At a White House gathering with technology executives on September 29, Trump praised what he called “tremendous self-policing” by the AI industry and joined major technology companies in announcing a voluntary safety accord emphasizing internal controls, outside audits and corporate oversight.

In other words, Trump wants us to trust the government and the AI sector to police itself.

The Founders knew better than to trust power to police itself. That is one of the central premises of the Constitution.

As James Madison famously observed in Federalist No. 51, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”

The Founders did not assume that those entrusted with power would always restrain themselves. They divided power among competing branches because they understood that good intentions are not a safeguard against tyranny. Neither are voluntary promises. Neither are corporate ethics policies. Neither are algorithms.

Machines are not angels. The corporations building them are not angels. The politicians deploying them are not angels. And artificial intelligence does not repeal the oldest lesson in the history of government: power requires limits because power will always seek to expand.

This is where the campaign to shrink the federal workforce takes on an entirely different significance.

There is nothing inherently wrong with reducing unnecessary government employment, eliminating waste or using technology to make public services work better.

The danger lies in confusing fewer government employees with less government.

A government can have fewer workers and still become vastly more powerful. It can automate surveillance. Automate investigations. Automate eligibility decisions. Automate regulatory enforcement. Automate censorship. Automate watchlists. Automate targeting. Automate punishment.

Indeed, a government freed from the practical limits imposed by manpower could become more pervasive than anything an earlier generation of bureaucrats could have achieved.

That is the paradox confronting us.

We may be building a smaller federal workforce and a larger government machine.

Trump will not be president forever. Neither will the politicians who come after him.

But the AI infrastructure being erected now—the databases, automated systems, surveillance capabilities, digital gateways and government relationships with technology companies—will be inherited by every future administration.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, once those powers become embedded in the machinery of government, they will be exceedingly difficult to dismantle.

That is why the debate over artificial intelligence cannot be reduced to whether AI creates jobs, destroys jobs, saves taxpayer money or makes government more convenient.

The greater question is what happens when fewer and fewer human beings stand between government power and the people subjected to it.

What happens when there is no human face behind the decision? No human judgment. No human hesitation. No human mercy. No human conscience.

No human being willing—or able—to say: this is wrong.

The great danger is not that artificial intelligence will suddenly seize control of the government. It is that government officials will willingly surrender more and more control to artificial intelligence because machines are faster, cheaper, more obedient and easier to blame.

That is how bureaucracy without bureaucrats becomes authoritarianism without accountability.

The government may employ fewer people. It may operate fewer offices. It may eliminate paperwork and automate entire agencies. But if it can watch more people, investigate more people, process more people, target more people and exercise more power over more lives than ever before, that is not smaller government.

It is government without human limits.

The Founders built the Constitution around a simple truth: power cannot be trusted to restrain itself.

That truth does not become obsolete because the machinery of power now runs on artificial intelligence. If anything, it becomes more urgent.

Because once we remove the human beings who can question, resist, object and refuse, we may discover too late that we have not eliminated the bureaucracy at all.

We have eliminated the brakes.

Original Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/ai_authoritarianism_a_government_without_constitutional_brakes

John and Nisha Whitehead | Rutherford.org | The Rutherford Institute

“If Trump can disappear them, he can disappear you.”—Robert Reich

America, you got fooled. Again.

For starters, the war on illegal immigration was never just about illegal immigration.

If you fell for that, chances are you’re still falling for the government’s oldest trick: manufacture a crisis, identify an enemy, frighten the public, declare an emergency, and then use the resulting fear to justify another expansion of government power.

Terrorism. Crime. Drugs. National security. Illegal immigration.

Different threats. Same playbook.

Take a legitimate problem—or inflate it into an existential menace—and suddenly constitutional safeguards become inconveniences, extraordinary powers become necessities, and anyone who questions the government’s methods can be accused of siding with the enemy.

Immigration is a perfect example.

A highly charged issue that pushes all of the knee-jerk, polarizing buttons when it comes to deep-seated fears and prejudices, immigration has been the perfect vehicle for the Trump administration’s political fearmongering and authoritarian power grabs.

Trump has repeatedly described illegal immigration in the language of invasion, criminality and national-security emergency.

Yet a closer look suggests a far more complicated reality.

A 2026 Cato Institute analysis of Census data found that undocumented immigrants were incarcerated at a rate of 674 per 100,000 people in 2024, compared with 1,195 per 100,000 native-born Americans. Legal immigrants had an even lower incarceration rate of 303 per 100,000. Cato concluded that both legal and undocumented immigrants are less crime-prone than native-born Americans.

So, what is the government’s end game?

We’ve been so fixated on the overt cruelty, unapologetic authoritarianism, thuggish brutality, and blatantly unconstitutional abuses of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown that we missed the larger menace taking shape behind it.

While the country fights over who should be allowed in, who should be kicked out, and who can participate in a pay-to-play scheme that benefits the oligarchy, the government continues building the infrastructure of a prison state.

This is the real power grab.

The government is using its so-called war on illegal immigration to normalize something far more dangerous: a system in which due process can be bypassed, people can be detained and moved beyond easy public scrutiny, government agents can wield extraordinary enforcement powers with minimal accountability, and constitutional protections can be treated as optional whenever the government invokes security.

Immigration is the testing ground.

The precedent being established and the tactics being trotted out and normalized are the real danger. Because once the government establishes that it can suspend the Constitution’s safeguards for one disfavored group, there is nothing magical that keeps those powers confined to that group.

We are all at risk.

Be warned: the literal and figurative walls being erected in the name of national security should concern the people already living inside them. The machinery being built to find, track, identify, seize, detain and disappear immigrants can just as easily be redirected toward the population at large.

That is how a police state becomes a prison state.

Immigration enforcement is the dress rehearsal in anticipation of the government’s ultimate muscle flex.

To round people up on the scale envisioned by the administration, the government first has to know who people are. Where they live. Where they work. Where they drive. Who they associate with. What they look like. What databases contain information about them. Where they were yesterday. Where they are today. And where they might be tomorrow.

That requires surveillance. Lots of it.

Biometric databases. Facial recognition. License-plate readers. Flock cameras. Data brokers. Location tracking. Artificial intelligence. Phone extraction tools. Government databases linked to still more government databases.

The Brennan Center for Justice reports that the Department of Homeland Security has committed more than $2.9 billion in recent years to surveillance, data collection and analytics technologies used in the interior of the United States, including more than $1 billion for biometrics. Those systems include tools capable of tracking phones and vehicles, collecting facial and other biometric data, purchasing commercial information and combining records from multiple databases to create detailed profiles on individuals.

Then comes enforcement, masked agents, raids, checkpoints, detention centers, private prisons, transfers, rendition—all wrapped in the reassuring language of public safety and national security.

For now, immigration is the convenient scapegoat to justify the crackdowns and loss of liberty, but the machinery of oppression being assembled does not know how to discriminate and differentiate.

A surveillance camera does not know whether or not you are a citizen. A license-plate reader does not know how you voted. A biometric database does not care why your face is being searched. A location-tracking system does not distinguish between following an undocumented immigrant and following a political protester.

Indeed, the Brennan Center notes that DHS technologies acquired for border security and criminal investigations have capabilities that can be directed at anyone—immigrants, protesters, travelers and other members of the public.

The machinery simply does what it was built to do: find, track, identify, classify, control and, when ordered, detain.

We are watching the infrastructure of a prison state being assembled in plain sight.

Surveillance, however, is only the beginning. The real power comes when the government takes everything it knows about you and acts on it.

Find you. Seize you. Detain you. Move you. Cut you off from the people who might intervene on your behalf. Eventually, make it difficult for anyone outside the system to determine where you are at all.

This is where ICE becomes particularly instructive.

Not because every American is about to be deported, but because ICE demonstrates what government looks like when surveillance, databases, aggressive enforcement, detention and secrecy are fused into a single system.

As historian Timothy Snyder warns, “If you accept that non-citizens have no right to due process, you are accepting that citizens have no right to due process. All the government has to do is claim that you are not a citizen; without due process you have no chance to prove the contrary.”

Once due process ceases to be a non-negotiable right for one disfavored group, it becomes an optional privilege for everyone.

This is the slippery slope that eventually allows the government to make everyone disappear—citizen and immigrant alike—whenever they become inconvenient, or disfavored, or no longer useful to the powers-that-be.

People are already disappearing inside the United States.

Seized without warning, denied due process, and locked up indefinitely in a sprawling network of immigration detention centers, county jails, private prisons, temporary holding facilities and federal facilities, these individuals are being transferred from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, moved hundreds or thousands of miles from family and lawyers, made increasingly difficult to locate—they are being made to disappear.

Their whereabouts are effectively being scrubbed from public view.

On September 15, 2026, ICE stopped publicly listing the locations of many detainees with final removal orders in its online detainee locator.

Immigration attorneys told the Associated Press that clients suddenly vanished from the public system, making it harder to determine whether they had been transferred, remained somewhere in federal custody or were being prepared for removal. ICE defended the change as part of its effort to prioritize deportations of people with final orders.

There can be no understating what is at stake when the government acquires the power to make people disappear from public view.

This is disappearance by bureaucracy.

People disappear first from public view. Then from the practical reach of their lawyers and families. Then, potentially, from the database. Public records no longer reveal where some detainees are. And sometimes the next stop is another country entirely.

For now, it’s immigrants—our fellow workers, friends, family members, members of our communities, people who pay taxes, contribute to the economy, and once helped make America and its economy the envy of the world—who are being rounded up, designated as “unhuman” in order to deny them basic human rights and made to disappear, but they are just the warm-up.

Watch and learn: once these tactics have been refined and mastered, we’ll be the next targets.

The government has been perfecting variations on this machinery for decades.

After 9/11, the United States transported terrorism suspects—some never convicted of crimes—to secret CIA detention facilities beyond the ordinary reach of American courts and public scrutiny. Extraordinary rendition allowed government to outsource detention and interrogation into legal gray zones.

Yet disappearing people has never required sending them overseas.

Consider Homan Square.

For years, the Chicago Police Department operated a facility on the city’s West Side where lawyers and former detainees alleged that people were taken for interrogation before appearing through normal booking channels. Records later obtained by the Guardian documented more than 7,000 arrests associated with Homan Square over roughly eleven years, while documented attorney access was extraordinarily rare.

That danger is becoming harder to dismiss.

In September 2026, Amnesty International released a report alleging extensive human-rights violations in U.S. immigration enforcement. Amnesty alleges that the current mass detention and deportation campaign has subjected migrants, refugees and asylum seekers to a broad range of abuses.

Amnesty has called for ICE to be abolished.

Whatever the remedy, no government agency should be empowered to act lawlessly and make people disappear.

The Trump administration’s latest tactic for discouraging migration into the U.S. and instilling terror in the hearts of immigrants already here is the use of “third-country removals”: sending certain deportees to countries where they are not citizens and may never have lived.

We saw this in the wake of 9/11 under the Bush administration with their use of extraordinary rendition and remote torture sites.

The rationale seemed to be that if you removed someone from the United States, the Constitution wouldn’t follow them.

Indeed, the Trump administration appears to be trying to move faster than the lawyers and courts in an effort to outrun judicial review and the Constitution.

Perhaps the destination is overseas. Perhaps it is another jail. Perhaps it is another prison right here in America. That distinction no longer matters: you do not have to leave the United States to disappear into the machinery of the prison state.

This is precisely why due process matters.

Due process is not a privilege. It is not a legal loophole. And it is not a technicality reserved for people the government considers deserving of special treatment.

Due process is what stands between accusation and punishment, between suspicion and imprisonment, and between government power and individual liberty.

At the heart of that protection is habeas corpus, which translates to “you should have the body.”

Dating back to the Magna Carta of 1215, habeas corpus allows someone imprisoned by the government to challenge that detention in court and demand that the government make the case for why they should be held.

The Founders considered habeas such a fundamental and necessary ingredient in guarding against government tyranny that they included it in Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution. As the Brennan Center explains, habeas “was conceived to guarantee protection from the king arbitrarily disappearing subjects to secret dungeons without just cause or due process.”

Despite what the Trump administration would have us believe, habeas applies equally to citizens and non-citizens alike within the United States.

The act of transporting someone outside the U.S. does not lessen that protection, but it does make it harder to enforce.

History has supplied enough warnings.

Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War resulted in arrests without ordinary judicial process. The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II demonstrated how quickly fear and prejudice can overwhelm constitutional safeguards. The post-9/11 rendition program demonstrated how easily government can try to place human beings beyond the effective reach of American courts.

Homan Square demonstrated that you do not have to leave American soil for that to happen.

And today’s immigration detention system demonstrates how these tactics can merge: masked arrests, county jails, private prisons, remote detention centers, repeated transfers, limited access to attorneys, disappearing locator records, expedited deportations and third-country removals.

Each scenario arose from different circumstances, but each also demonstrates what happens when government insists that extraordinary conditions justify extraordinary powers.

This is why the familiar refrain—if you are here legally, you have nothing to fear—misses the point. So does: if you are an American citizen, you have nothing to fear. And: If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.

That is the oldest sales pitch in the police-state playbook: “Just trust us.” “We’re only going after the bad people.”

But inevitably, the definition of “bad people” changes.

In 1935, Sinclair Lewis published It Can’t Happen Here, imagining authoritarian government taking root not in some distant dictatorship but in America.

Those four words capture one of the most dangerous assumptions a free people can make.

It can’t happen here. Not in America. Not to citizens. Not to innocent people.

Not to me.

Perhaps not. Perhaps the government will never put you on a rendition flight to a country you’ve never visited. Perhaps you will never disappear into a detention center. Perhaps masked agents will never come to your door.

But there are other ways for a free people to disappear.

Privacy disappears. Anonymity disappears. The freedom to move about without being tracked disappears. The freedom to associate without creating a digital trail disappears. The freedom to protest without being identified, catalogued and entered into a database disappears. The presumption that government should leave you alone unless it has legitimate cause to investigate you disappears.

Bit by bit, the boundaries separating a free citizen from a prisoner begin to disappear, too.

You are watched. Tracked. Catalogued. Scanned. Recorded. Flagged. Followed.

Your movements become data. Your associations become data. Your face becomes data. Your life becomes searchable.

All that remains is for someone in government to decide what the data means.

This is how “We the People” disappear.

Not necessarily onto rendition flights.

Not necessarily into secret prisons.

We disappear when we cease to live as a people presumed free and begin living instead as inhabitants of a country-sized surveillance state—watched constantly, tracked everywhere, our movements and associations increasingly subject to monitoring, cataloguing and government scrutiny.

That is the larger danger concealed by the immigration debate.

ICE is showing us what the machinery can do.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, eventually the prison built for someone else can become the prison imprisoning all of us.

Original Article: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/first_them_then_us_americas_shift_from_police_state_to_prison_state

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.” ~ Lucius Annaeus Seneca

There are certain tenets of thought that occupy the minds of men that are based solely on the idea of ‘authority;’ as in mastery, worship, dominance, and control. The most prevalent venues of these most asinine and absurd ideas are seen in the areas of religion (especially organized) and government, of which I believe to be one and the same. This comment I am sure will bring out emotional disdain from the crowd, but with little analysis, one should be able to connect the two, whether they act independently or as one matters not, as the concept of rule lies deep in the bowels of both.

I must make clear that I am not attempting to belittle anyone’s spiritual beliefs, regardless whether I would agree with them or not, (this same sentiment does not apply to government) as I, nor any other, can prove whether these ‘beliefs’ are valid or false. Attempting to claim such unknown knowledge as fact, is hypocritical to my way of thinking. My position in this matter is that I do not know for certain how or why this world and its inhabitants exist, other than to say that ‘creation’ of one sort or another is evident. As to exactly how that occurred, I simply have no idea, no supporting fact, so I will not attempt to assume to have the wisdom to claim otherwise.

What I do know, is that religion and government both assume to hold false authority over all participants; one to a ‘god’ (or representative figure) of their choosing, through church or sect, while the other to the ‘god’ of rule. Both are steeped in ‘worship’ of one form or another, and since ‘worship’ indicates an abandonment of self, a giving in to a stated ‘authority,’ or a bowing down to a master, whether assumed celestial, human, or both, I disregard it as weakness and a debilitation of independent cognitive function.

I find it most comical that I am writing this essay, as the most taboo subjects to discuss in open forums are religion and politics, and here I am discussing both at the same time, and as one. What horror you say.  This will likely be considered social blasphemy. This is easy for me because I have no skin in the game as it were, as I believe in no rule, no master, no ‘authority,’ no kings, and no bowing down or allegiance to false idols, whether religion or State. I do not consider myself above others, I do not consider myself a ‘god,’ I do not consider holding power over another, and I never consider harming anyone unless due to the need of actual physical self-defense. Therefore, I am not an enemy of man, or a threat to anyone, but just an observer of life and a seeker of knowledge.

At this point in time, fake religious fervor, as practiced by evil politicians, combined with tyrannical government policy, have joined forces in order to achieve the ultimate goal of a fully globalized one world ruling system and religion. This sought after universal rule is made up of regional technates combined into a worldwide technocratic control system, with the major players vying for the highest seats of power in this political wet dream of total controlling, arrogant, narcissistic superiority.

In other words, religion has again become government, and government has become religion, not that elements of this marriage made in hell have not been active at many levels for an eternity. There is little difference today in worship of religion or worship of the State, as can be evidenced by simple observation of behavior. Actually, I would tend to assess this situation as one in which the worship of State (nationalism) is more prevalent than ever, and that the fake political religious element being used is meant to build a more docile collective herd, so as to gain even more mass control over weak-minded populations.

Worshipers and followers you see, are much easier to eliminate, as they will walk off cliffs, walk into fire, sacrifice their lives in heinous wars, and claim ‘country’ as ‘god’ without so much as an even a thought, as they willingly become slaves of ‘masters’ and rule.

Populations here and around the world are accepting of the coming enslavement of mankind, as they acquiesce to AI, biometrics, all-encompassing surveillance, bogus emergency declarations, digitization of everything, hyper-inflation, job loss, and intentional food and energy depletion by the ruling whores. Do not be fooled by all those telling you that the ‘people’ are waking up, as this is pure propaganda and lies. Nothing has changed except the acceleration of totalitarian technocratic policy.

There is a huge difference between waking up and actively participating in the negation and elimination of State, and griping about how “you did not vote for this,’ which is ridiculous rhetorical nonsense. Sitting on your ass on your cell phone, voting for your master, and refusing to accept the truth and then do something about it, is not waking up. Everyone who votes, gets exactly what they deserve and what they voted for, as participation in this evil system, is implied consent to be ruled. That means an acceptance of your own voluntary slavery. The buck stops there, as all who believe in government as ‘god,’ who continue to vote and support these monsters in politics, all those who wave their blood-soaked flags, are the problem, not the solution.

The bottom line here is that showing allegiance, worship, and reverence for religion or government, or both, will only bring sorrow, helplessness, and a loss of self. Individuals solve problems and better themselves, while those around them clinging to collective hordes, (compliant followers) prevent intellect from blossoming, and therefore destroy the efforts of all those who actually desire to be responsible and free.

Religion and government have combined in order to better control all of you. Look around, notice all the relationships between these two major forces of evil, and understand that you are being played. How could anyone with an IQ above 80 think that the evil narcissist Trump, any and all of his cohorts in crime, or Netanyahu and all his genocidal followers, or the Pope and the Vatican, or any who seek rule, and all others in positions of power over the masses; all who work together against you, could ever have any empathy or thought whatsoever for any living thing? These vermin are the worst of mankind, so the elimination of their power and this entire system, are what is necessary in order to begin to gain even a chance of peace and harmony. 

“Those who believe religion and politics aren’t connected don’t understand either.” ~ Mahatma Gandhi

Image: Source [Manually edited meme, ghibli styled using ChatGTP]

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/religion-is-government-government-is-religion/

Related:

modernity.news | Jon Fleetwood

U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is soliciting a 10-year pandemic vaccine [bioweapon injection] manufacturing program with a 660-million-dose national planning target, renewing a procurement system established before the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

HHS has also recently announced plans to suspend FOIA and pandemic oversight while continuing vaccine and biodefense contracts.

Which raises questions:

Who stands to profit from the next p[l]andemic?

What safeguards exist against its deliberate orchestration?

Who will investigate potential conflicts of interest and coordination when pandemic vaccine contracting continues while public records access and oversight are suspended?

You can contact HHS here.

Five Documented Findings

1. 2005: HHS established its National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile.

2. 2006–2007: HHS committed approximately $1.27 billion to vaccine manufacturing, adjuvants, and facility upgrades.

3. 2007: HHS established a 600-million-dose production target, with officials projecting that adjuvants could accelerate production capacity to 2008–2009.

4. 2009: H1N1 pandemic occurred, prompting HHS to activate preexisting vaccine contracts. Despite its 600-million-dose planning target, HHS ultimately purchased just over 190 million H1N1 vaccine doses, according to the Government Accountability Office’s 2011 investigation, GAO-11-632.

5. 2026: BARDA solicited contracts lasting up to 2036, specifying a 660-million-dose planning will “likely be required,” with provisions for emerging pathogens and Department of War participation.

6. 2026–20??: ???

SAM.gov lists HHS/BARDA’s 2026 pandemic influenza vaccine solicitation (75A50126R00001) as an active federal contract opportunity, seeking manufacturers for a program with a 660-million-dose national planning requirement and contracts lasting up to 10 years.

HHS/BARDA’s August 17, 2026, solicitation (75A50126R00001) seeks pandemic vaccine manufacturing contracts lasting up to 10 years, citing a national planning requirement of 660 million doses and including provisions for emerging pathogens and Department of War participation.

HHS/BARDA’s August 2026 pandemic vaccine solicitation, Section B.1, page 3, identifies a national planning requirement of 660 million doses and directs contractors to manufacture vaccines against influenza or other viruses with pandemic potential, as required by BARDA.

Forced Inference

Before the 2009 influenza pandemic, HHS planned for 600 million influenza vaccine doses, invested more than $1 billion in pandemic influenza vaccine infrastructure, and activated its contracts when H1N1 emerged.

Seventeen years later, HHS is again planning for an entire nation’s vaccination (660 million doses) before another p[l]andemic they’re confident will soon occur.

How did federal pandemic vaccine procurement become so closely aligned with the timing of a subsequent pandemic in 2009, and why is HHS preparing the same nationwide capacity again in 2026?

Original Article: https://modernity.news/2026/10/13/hhs-locks-in-660-million-pandemic-flu-doses-under-rfk-jr-reviving-pre-2009-system/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Related:

The dangerous UN declaration raises concerns that scientific censorship, lockdowns, and experimental vaccine mandates could be back on the table.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH | substack.com/@nichulscher

On October 12, 2026, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a new pandemic declaration, with 153 countries voting in favor, three against, and two abstaining. The United States, Israel, and Argentina voted against the declaration.

Buried within the nine-page document is a provision that should concern anyone who values scientific freedom, informed consent, and the right to question public-health authorities.

Paragraph 57 explicitly calls for governments to counter vaccine hesitancy as part of broader efforts against health-related “misinformation” and “disinformation.”

The declaration goes even further, explicitly endorsing “infodemic management” and a “whole-of-government, whole-of-society” pandemic response.

This sounds like more scientific censorship, lockdowns, and experimental vaccine mandates.

The sweeping declaration also promotes:

• VACCINES WITHIN 100 DAYS: Scaling up vaccine, therapeutic, and diagnostic availability within the first 100 days of a pandemic threat, raising concerns about another Operation Warp Speed disaster.
• EXPANDED GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE: Strengthening disease-monitoring networks, early-warning systems, laboratory capacity, and digital health infrastructure, raising concerns about privacy breaches and oversight.
• INTERNATIONAL PATHOGEN SHARING: Promoting rapid sharing of potentially dangerous pathogen materials and genetic sequences across borders, raising concerns about biosafety.
• BILLIONS IN PANDEMIC FUNDING: Highlighting a $15 billion annual preparedness financing gap while encouraging expanded international funding, public-private partnerships, and support for the WHO.
• SUPPORT FOR THE WHO PANDEMIC AGREEMENT: Endorsing further negotiations to finalize the agreement’s pathogen-sharing provisions and facilitate future signature and ratification.

The declaration is non-binding and does not itself authorize censorship, compulsory vaccination, or expanded WHO enforcement powers. However, it establishes a broad international policy agenda that seriously endangers health freedom.

Questioning a vaccine’s safety, effectiveness, necessity, or long-term consequences is not misinformation. It is an essential part of scientific inquiry and informed medical decision-making. The scientific community must remain free to investigate adverse events, challenge regulatory decisions, publish contradictory findings, and question public-health policies without fear of retaliation.

Vaccine hesitancy is NOT misinformation.

Scientific dissent is NOT disinformation.

Questioning public-health authorities is NOT a threat to public health.

No international pandemic framework should undermine those fundamental principles. The Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has already gotten away with the COVID [scam] disaster, and now they’re trying to lock in the same playbook for their next global health emergency.

Original Article: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-153-nations-adopt-un-pandemic

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Donald Jeffries | "I Protest" | donaldjeffries.substack.com

Sometimes I wish I’d never watched the movie The Truman Show. It really made me question the whole nature of our reality. 9/11. Sandy Hook. The Boston Bombing. So many events of the 21st century leave you shaking your head and searching for crisis actors. The narratives are childishly implausible, and nothing really gets resolved.

On September 30, an incident in the cockpit forced a flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv to make an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia. Allegedly. I say allegedly because few people seem to believe it really happened. I certainly don’t. Of course, I’m jaded beyond description, having researched so many of these events, without finding the slightest trace of credibility anywhere. Sharp and snappy tweets on X declared that the incident was “faker than the moon landing,” which admittedly was pretty damn fake. We’re supposed to believe that an Israeli plumber was the hero of this story. A Yiddish Todd Beamer. I don’t know how you say “Let’s Roll!” in Hebrew, but that’s basically what he did. Online skeptics- certainly not professional “journalists”- pointed out the inconsistencies in the appearance of the plane’s cabin. Even mainstream outlets discovered that aftermath footage celebrating the non-Irish Flight 93 was actually of Israel’s men’s basketball team, taken in August 2025.

Flydubai Airlines claimed that an “altercation occurred in the flight deck” on FZ1073, forcing crew members to help secure the aircraft and divert it to Saudi Arabia. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reported that the co-pilot stabbed the Indian pilot for unclear reasons, in an attempt to bring the plane down. Presumably, the co-pilot was Indian, too, so an unlikely candidate to be working for Hamas. Which must have been behind this, what with Bibi Baby front and center. Online “conspiracy theorists” called the incident a false flag, and coined it Bibiwood. Bibi Baby was on hand, naturally, to greet courageous plumber Yaniv Hayoun, who had enough dramatic sense to remain in the bloody shirt he wore while grabbing control of the plane, much as stewardess Karen Black did back in one of those Airport films. I haven’t met any non-Irish plumbers in my life, but evidently they have the right stuff. If more of the Chosen chose plumbing as their occupation, it looks like we’d all be better off.

There was also a heroic dentist, in addition to the heroic plumber, who wrestled with the non-heroic co-pilot. I was once a lowly Material Handler back in my blue collar days. Why can’t it ever be a heroic Material Handler? Maybe a file clerk? Cashier? The Indian pilot was hailed as a hero, too, as he managed to open the cockpit door despite being stabbed, saving the lives of all 182 people aboard the flight. “Hollywood isn’t creative enough to come up with stories like this!” said Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, presumably with a straight face. A story in the Associated Press noted that “Although major questions remained unanswered on Thursday about the attacker and his motive, the story of ordinary passengers saving the Flydubai flight from disaster has quickly become the stuff of legend.” That sentence reads like an epitaph for our allegedly free press. Rest assured that those “major questions” will never be answered, by our corrupt government, or the state-controlled media.

Benjamin Netanyahu, taking a break from ordering the genocide of whatever non- non-Irish remain in Gaza, embraced the heroic plumber as only a non-goy can embrace another non-goy. Bibi Baby went so far as to promote the plumber’s business, tweeting, “He can help you too — I highly recommend him!” Bibi even left a 5 star review online. The heroic dentist, Dr. Shota Mutayev, treated the injured captain just like a medical doctor would. Well, if a plumber can land a plane, why can’t a dentist doctor an injured pilot? Musayev thoughtfully took the time to shoot a video of the pilot on the floor, complaining that his head hurt. That sounds just like something a heroic dentist would do, document the scene while letting the patient suffer a bit longer, before rendering aid. In perhaps the most touching scene of all, plumber Hayoun asked Bibi Baby to “Tell Trump that I love him.” It’s hard for Israeli plumbers not to like a guy who has ceded control of the U.S. government to Zionists.

This, of course, got Trumpenstein’s attention. “An Israeli plumber, never flew a plane, was rarely in planes, very rarely flew,” he told reporters. “And he saw what was going on and he heard the screaming…he ripped this guy out of the seat, threw him back, the crowd got him, the passengers got him.” It is unknown who was flying the plane during the time when the heroic plumber had the unidentified co-pilot, whom an Israeli official helpfully declared had “mused about killing Jews online,” in a headlock, before he grabbed the controls himself, drawing on his vast experience watching actors do it on television. To be fair, it’s certainly reasonable speculation that Hayoun is an actor himself, and thus just as qualified to fly a plane as anyone else in show business. The unidentified co-pilot’s “social media accounts [say] clearly that he has been radicalized into jihadist ideology,” the Israeli official told the Times of Israel. Bibi Baby stated that the co-pilot “underwent Islamist radical indoctrination.”

As if all this wasn’t exciting enough, news broke out of Russia that a new “pneumonic plague” was afoot, after attractive young lab worker Daria Shipilova died of undisclosed causes. While the WHO’s initial risk assessment was said to be low, the fear porn is kicking in nonetheless. Is it just me, or is it suspicious that “pneumonic” rhymes with “bubonic,” as in the “bubonic plague” that sounds so terrifying to the average man/woman/they/them. The CDC is said to be “monitoring the situation closely.” While they never produced the “Patient Zero” for the COVID psyop, here we already had the Patient Zero for the Russian Pneumonic Plague. And she just happens to be as attractive as most crisis actors are, if she was in fact a crisis actor. CNN has titled one fear mongering story on the subject, “What we know so far.” Watch out when they say that. Over 200 people are said to have been hospitalized in Russia following the death of the attractive Patient Zero. Well, maybe the hospitals in Russia don’t kill patients as often and easily as the ones in America do. The New York Post called it a “Black Plague,” and insinuated that Vladimir Putin was covering things up.

There was some frenzy online, with users comparing the situation to the early days of COVID. Ah, remember the good old early days of COVID? When they were lying relentlessly about the number and cause of deaths? When they pushed fantasies of Chinese dropping dead in the streets, and spitting on doorknobs to speed up the transmission of the deadly pandemic? An October 4 tweet from former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, best known for crying even more easily than most cucked White males, warned, “This is not a joke. The Russian biological war research should have us all concerned and stopping ALL flight from Russia, and all Russians from entry. The longer this goes on the more countries we will have to stop flight from. FYI: the Russians were working on a plague that is resistant to antibiotics.” Sounds pretty scary. We should go to war with them. Another Republican congressman, Don Bacon, tweeted, “I remember hearing from anti-Ukraine voices about their so-called bio labs. It was Russian disinformation ops at their best. But in reality it is Russia with the bio labs.” Wait a minute, I thought it was the evil Democrats who were pushing the Russia! Russia! Russia! nonsense. This whole Uniparty thing gets so confusing.

Biological warfare author Annie Jacobsen, who I’m going to guess isn’t Irish, warned, “I’ve now been in contact w/current, highest level mil/intel/diplo/homeland security officials in biological threat arena and report w/authority that USG has all eyes on the plague outbreak in Russia and is not letting up.” She closes with some shameless self- promotion, “Read BIOLOGICAL WAR: A SCENARIO. All of them have. Get informed. Stay informed.” Now I’m certainly not above shamelessly self-promoting my own books, but I’m not even close to being a Pulitzer Prize finalist, which Jacobsen informs us she was. In another tweet, the Pulitzer Prize finalist declares, “I suspect that soon the Russian Federation will begin denying this plague outbreak started as a BSL-3 lab accident, and come down hard on those reporting it as such.” Okay, I get it. The dirty Democrats denied that COVID was a lab leak, too. I would counter by pointing out all of you denied that “COVID-19” was a psyop which was never isolated.

Daily Caller reporter Emily Kopp, who “has expressed pride in her Jewish ancestry,” struck an identical tone, tweeting, “Local media in Irkutsk alleges that Russian TV deleted five stories about the pneumonia of unknown etiology case. Early censored reports out of Wuhan were important for investigating COVID's origins. Save everything you read.” The Sunday Times declared, “There are fears this could be another Wuhan.” Except there really wasn’t a “Wuhan” in the sense Republicucks think there was. There was a “Dark Winter” series of table-top exercises, and lots of dire warnings from Chief Eugenicist Bill Gates. Then a nasty strain of flu misrepresented as “COVID-19.” One “Mike (not a) Rothschild,” who is probably not a non-non-Irish, tweeted, “The ‘Putin is saving the world from Ukrainian biolabs’ dudes must be having a confusing day.” Brian Krassenstein (no comment necessary) tweeted, “2019 Trump President=COVID. 2026 Trump President= Plague outbreak.”

Remember the Hantavirus? I wrote about it not that long ago, right here on Substack. It supposedly killed actor Gene Hackman’s wife, and in effect killed him, too, since she died and was unable to care for him. This was the one that comes from having sex with rodents or something. Maybe it was French kissing rodents. Either way, not much of a threat to even the most depressed Incel. Officials warned about the potential dangers of that. Officials warn about the potential dangers of a lot of things. Except their own criminal misbehavior, that is. In 2020, our beloved leaders told us to “Prepare for a disease deadlier than COVID.” The disease was Marburg, a hemorrhagic fever that kills the majority of the people it infects. While no one in America has ever died from Marburg, in December 2020, HHS issued a “Notice of Declaration” in which they stated that “marburgviruses are a threat to the public health security of the American people. requiring vigilance and a continuing need for development of medical countermeasures.” Marburg was known as an African disease, transmitted by bats and monkeys. Is any real or fake “plague” not transmitted by bats and monkeys? And why is Africa the breeding ground for so many of them?

Recently, Russia and China held a cross border emergency simulation on the dangers of infectious diseases. They even specifically mentioned the plague. Think Event 201, which happened just prior to the COVID psyop, and just after Dr. Kary Mullis, who invented the PCR test, died so conveniently. They’re always holding drills and simulations. To prepare for things that reasonable people wouldn’t expect. That’s why they’re leaders, and we’re mere peasants. Thanks to the nonstop fear porn we’re subjected to, we are continuously anticipating a great calamity. World War III. An asteroid striking Earth. A deadly sun flare. Economic collapse. Shouldn’t we, at some point, look forward to something positive happening? Why can’t the AI we hear so much about work in the coal mines, for instance? Why can’t it do something to make life easier, instead of spying on us in expensive, unnecessary “data centers?” Why are we always on the brink of disaster? Why can’t we experience a new Enlightenment?

How many dubious incidents, widely reported by unquestioning talking heads, will the masses accept before they all start to question them, instead of just the “conspiracy theorists?” Why would anyone accept that there was a real assassination attempt at the last White House Correspondents Dinner? I covered that one in detail right here on Substack. Kash Patel and Dan Bongino assure us that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, but virtually no one in the heartland believes that. Well, maybe what’s left of the MAGA cult. The 25th anniversary of 9/11 showed that too many Americans still actually believe the fairy tale that gave us the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security department. We’ve gone from Jackie Kennedy wearing her blood stained pink suit during LBJ’s sadistic Air Force One swearing in ceremony, to a heroic Israeli plumber wearing his own blood stained shirt while being embraced by the real leader of this country. The Sheeple maintain their loyalty to the lies, no matter how obvious.

I don’t know whether the Flydubai incident occurred or not. However, using pattern recognition and critical thinking skills, and based upon their long history of lying about everything, I think it’s wise to doubt it. I researched some of these highly publicized events, like the Gabby Giffords shooting, the Sandy Hook incident, the Boston Bombing, among others. It doesn’t take long to find the anomalies. Lots of anomalies. Endless anomalies. Witnesses who all act the same uncharacteristic way. Who smile and laugh in the face of horrific tragedy. And who often start instantly pushing for gun control, instead of grieving. Drills that seem to be taking place in close proximity to the events. This goes back to 9/11. Yes, there were drills that took place on 9/11. As in plural. Global Guardian and Vigilant Guardian were only two of them. There was even a fire drill at Boston’s Logan International Airport, where the 19 crazed Arabs, armed with box cutters and plastic knives, hijacked those planes.

Generous helpings of fear porn come before anyone knows if this is going to be just another monkey pox/Ebola panic, or COVID 2.0. I have no idea. As most of you know, I don’t make predictions. I rarely get invited to neighborhood parties, let alone meetings of shadowy elitists. I do instinctively know, however, not to trust certain sources. All television networks. The CDC. The WHO. Bill Gates. Any elected official. Non-Irish posters on X with a history of warning about biological terrorism and the like. Why can’t they let us have a minute’s peace? Isn’t it enough that they are, as always, engaged in a nonsensical war in another far-flung country? Why must they toy with the fears of a stressed out population struggling to make ends meet? Moderna has patented a super new mRNA flu vaccine. What could go wrong? Ask your doctor. Tell your doctor. Don’t question anything except the questioners. They have your best interests at heart. Haven’t they demonstrated that? Sit back, and enjoy the show.

Image: Source [Edited using chatGTP]

Original Article: https://donaldjeffries.substack.com/p/hoaxes-r-us-flydubai-and-the-russian

Related:

LewRockwell.com

J.B. Shurk | AmericanThinker.com

Are all cultures equally worthy of our respect?  Globalists say, “yes.”

Are all religions equally worthy of our respect?  Globalists say, “yes.”

Are all nations equally worthy of our respect?  Globalists say, “yes.”

Globalists speak of “multiculturalism” as if it were a virtue and equate Western civilization with “white supremacy,” “patriarchy,” and “imperialism.”  They believe Christians should celebrate Islamic holidays.  They believe national borders are “racist.”  They believe that anybody who rejects globalism promotes “hate.”

If everything is true, though, then nothing is true.  If there are no borders, then there are no nations.  If there are no nations, then national governments represent nobody.  In other words, the globalist worldview is meaningless, contradictory, self-hating, and infuriating.

Recently, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in the Bronx shot an illegal immigrant gangbanger from the Dominican Republic when the criminal tried to avoid arrest by driving his vehicle directly at officers (presumably without a valid license or proper registration).  Instead of leaping to support the cops who defend the public every day, the Islamic, communist mayor of New York City declared that he was “angry” that ICE agents had shot a “New Yorker.”  The illegal alien in question broke into the U.S. only a few years ago and has already been arrested multiple times — including for armed robbery and drug-dealing — but Mayor Mamdani somehow considers the foreign criminal more of a “New Yorker” than the arresting officers or civilian bystanders whom he endangered.

Mamdani is originally from Uganda and became a U.S. citizen only eight years ago.  So a foreigner who now runs the financial center of the United States has more in common with a violent criminal from the Dominican Republic than with anyone born in America.  If everyone is a New Yorker, then nobody is a New Yorker.  If everyone is an American, then no-one is American.  Yet globalists demand that we treat Mamdani, the foreign gangbanger, and multi-generational American citizens as if they were all the same.

This nonsensical demand occurs all over the West.  Military-aged Muslims invade the United Kingdom each day.  Their belief system is so incompatible with that of native Brits that the U.K.’s Home Office hands out instruction manuals informing the foreign invaders that raping women and children is illegal in their new “homeland.”  Yet British politicians and BBC news pundits preposterously claim that the invaders are every bit as British as the folks whose families have resided in the British Isles for a thousand or more years.

For over a decade, globalists in Europe and North America have insisted that we Westerners call illegal immigrants “newcomers.”  It’s a not-so-subtle form of indoctrination meant to condition the feebleminded into believing that it’s perfectly normal for our uninvited “countrymen” to defecate in the streets, molest young girls, beat up Jews, burn down Christian churches, mow down white people with their cars, eat cats and swans in public parks, and commit welfare fraud on an industrial scale.  If the cultural habits of these strange “newcomers” appear grotesque, that’s probably because you’re a “hater,” a “white supremacist,” and most likely both!

This is all so absurd, isn’t it?  I’m a follower of Jesus Christ.  Islam is incompatible with my beliefs.  Muhammad was a raping, murdering pedophile and certainly no prophet of Almighty God.  But if I point any of this out in Canada, the U.K., or most of Europe, I get in trouble with the law.  If I pray silently outside an abortion clinic, I risk arrest.  If I quote passages from the Bible, certain Western governments will charge me for criminal “hate speech.”  If I acknowledge on social media that Christian churches are being mysteriously burned to the ground throughout the West, my speech will get flagged as “misinformation.”  When being a Christian in public and defending the faith are impermissible in the West, there is no place on the planet where Christians are truly safe.

Culture, religion, and national identity matter.  It matters whether someone moves to the United States because that person wants to assimilate and become an American, or whether that person wants to create a foreign nation inside America.  It matters whether our fellow countrymen possess moral virtue and recognize God as the source of our natural rights.  It matters whether the members of our society trust each other enough to work and live together.  It matters whether we are united by shared values, traditions, history, and beliefs.  Without these common connections, we are nothing to each other.  We are strangers, or worse, we are enemies.

Of all the destructive philosophies that have plagued our species, globalism must surely rank among the most noxious.  It clothes itself in the camouflage of virtue-signaling, false empathy, and fake compassion.  It disguises ideological conformity as “open-mindedness.”  It preaches “coexistence” while subjugating dissenters.  It robs people of their heritage in the name of “tolerance.”  It rewrites history when convenient.  It replaces merit and equality with entitlement and privilege.  When possible, globalism recycles Western civilization into foreign worldviews, and when that’s impossible, globalism tosses everything we hold dear straight into the garbage disposal.

If all civilizations are “Western” civilizations, then the West means nothing.  If all nations are the same, then no country is worth defending.  If all creeds are merely “social constructs,” then civic virtue is no better than antisocial vice.  Nihilism does not inspire heroic sacrifice.  It invites cultural suicide.

Whenever I listen to political pundits in Europe, they are breathless about war with Russia.  They are certain that Vladimir Putin is going to conquer the continent at any moment.  They talk about the necessity of military conscription.  They describe the looming conflict as some kind of moral defense of “democracy” against “authoritarianism.”  They invoke phrases such as “patriotic duty.”  Yet these same political pundits never address the civic breakdown in their own societies, including growing crime rates, decreasing levels of patriotism, and a metastasizing sense of hopelessness killing the youngest generations.

The West’s talking heads genuinely seem to believe that people will go to war to save government bureaucracy, of all things!  They think that unelected European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is somehow a symbol of “democracy.”  They think that King Charles III will inspire Christians even though Britain’s monarch no longer declares himself the “Defender of the Faith” but rather an amorphous protector of “a multi-faith nation.”  Globalists think they can rally Westerners around patriotic flags when they’ve spent the last decade arresting Westerners for being patriotic or waving their national flags.  They think that they can talk Westerners into protecting sovereign borders when globalists have kept national borders open for decades.  You simply cannot invite foreigners from all over the world to remake the West in their image and then expect Westerners to fight and die for a home that is no longer theirs.

Nobody runs up a hill to defend “multiculturalism.”  Nobody sacrifices his life for “diversity, inclusion, and equity.”  Nobody defends the Christian world by surrendering to Islam.  Nobody goes to war in order to save the “rules-based international order” from destruction.  It is utterly ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

The future belongs to those who are unafraid of making moral, cultural, and religious judgments.  Only those who are willing to state the obvious — that Western civilization is worth defending — will be able to lead the West in the decades ahead.  Big Government is a fake religion.  Political correctness is a toxic ideology.  Moral relativism invites depravity.  Borderless nations are easily conquered.

Globalists have made the world more dangerous because they stand for nothing.  We are returning to an age when civilizational convictions matter more than anything.  In this era, only committed societies will survive.  Any nation unwilling to defend its way of life will perish.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/10/nobody-goes-to-war-for-the-rules-based-order/

Image: Source [Edited | Photo from past conscription, not a recent photo]

Original Article: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/10/no_author/nobody-goes-to-war-for-the-rules-based-order/

Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

They want the data to flow to and from these machines more efficiently. Therefore they are increasing the use of wireless communication from these robots. All in the name of efficient data flow.

But what does this mean for humans?

Apart from the obvious increase in wireless radiation which is harmful for humans; the network connectivity they are building to be "efficient" means faster flow of information to and from all robots on the network.

Keeping in mind that these robots will eventually be used for war, not only against faked enemies but also against the entire human population when they switch to protecting the so called elite, aka the parasite pedophile class. This connectivity is nothing short of part of a highly efficient SkyNet kill chain system. Where every killer robot has instant access to data from the data centers and from each other.

With their end goal of an army of robots to protect them from us; every upgrade in their system is a further step towards a robotic controlled dystopian future. Yet engineers work tirelessly towards this goal and the masses cheer them on. Insane.

Clanker's are not a solution for humanity, they are the answer to the few's problem that we far outnumber them and therefore should be treated as a threat to humanity.

Below is a mainstream media article discussing the wireless upgrade they want for "efficiency".

DavidIcke.com | Sam Fenny

Mahesh Krishnaswamy | msn.com

The robots are among us. They’re carrying passengers through the streets of San Francisco, delivering parcels over the air, and working their way across farms, factories, mines, and industrial sites.

The collision we’re now witnessing between artificial intelligence and the physical world is often described as “Physical AI” – machines capable of perceiving their surroundings, making decisions, and taking action among us in the real world. But every new machine that clocks in has a second job we rarely see. It creates data. Lots of it.

In the US, the Federal Aviation Administration expects the commercial drone fleet to grow from approximately 966,000 aircraft at the end of 2024 to around 1.18 million by 2029. And in factories around the world, there was an estimated 4.66 million industrial robots working in 2024, while another half a million were installed during the year – more than twice the number installed a decade earlier.

Today’s autonomous machines are vastly more capable, but moving all that accumulated experience off them can still be surprisingly manual. In 2026, the fastest way to move masses of data off a machine is still a person carrying a hard drive. And as autonomous machines spread further into our cities and industries, keeping that information moving could become one of the defining infrastructure challenges of the robotics age.

Data Runs Both Ways

Imagine what an autonomous vehicle experiences. Cameras watch the roads from multiple angles, sensors and AI measure and make sense of the surrounding environment, while on-board systems track position and performance of the vehicle itself. Decisions are made and recorded in real-time as pedestrians cross roads, traffic lights change, and thousands of other vehicles and connected technologies move and exchange data around it.

Delivery drones, agricultural machinery, warehouse robots, and autonomous industrial equipment may operate in different environments, but the logic tracks. Every journey or task leaves behind a digital trail of sensor readings, video, telemetry, diagnostics, and operational logs.

And the information doesn’t travel in only one direction. These machines may also need fresh maps, software updates, configurations, AI models, and instructions from the computing infrastructure behind them. What they experience in the physical world flows back toward data centers, while the intelligence needed for their next task travels outward.

Multiply that exchange across millions of machines and an interesting new layer of internet traffic begins to emerge that we’re only just beginning to think about.

The direction of travel was visible as early as 2019, when a landmark university paper on 6G identified mobile robots, drones, and autonomous vehicles would drive demand for ubiquitous wireless intelligence – its vision for the 6G era included networks capable of supporting a 10,000-fold increase in traffic. The US commercial drone fleet alone is now heading toward seven figures, while industrial robots already number in the millions globally.

Perhaps most notable to casual observers, autonomous vehicles are becoming far more prevalent on the streets of our capitals and major cities. In June of this year, machines surpassed 57% of web traffic globally – the first time that bots have outnumbered humans – and they use networks in a very different way. Cloudflare predicts that non-human traffic could eventually surpass human traffic by a factor 1,000 within the next five years.

And a lesson learned by one machine needn’t remain with that machine. There’s an opportunity here that only connectivity can unlock. Google DeepMind’s Gemini Robotics 1.5 showed skills transferring “zero-shot” between physically different robots – a task taught using a two-armed Franka robot was executed by a humanoid, without any data collected on the target machine.

Sit with that implication. A person who masters a technique carries that knowledge around in their head, and when they retire, much of that experience leaves with them. A robot can potentially hand what it has learned to every other robot on the network, which means experience stops being “local” and starts becoming a shared asset across the network, compounding intelligence for the company’s moat.

The physical footprint of robots is spreading outward, but the data traffic they create remains concentrated at central locations. AI may increasingly have wheels, wings, and arms, but their intelligence and interactivity with the world remain still wholly dependent on their relationship with the nearest data center hub, and that’s a problem we now have to solve.

What’s the hold up?

When a robot arrives back at the depot and “clocks out” for a while, it presents an ideal opportunity to recharge, undergo inspection, run self-diagnostics, download updates, and get the data it needs for its next shift. This is when potentially enormous volumes of data, depending on the fleet size, need to be moved both to and from the device.

Sites that house, charge, or service machinery can therefore find themselves functioning as miniature data hubs, dealing with bursts of traffic as machines arrive and depart. And as fleets grow, so does the strain on the network connecting all these hubs. When uploading and downloading take longer than charging or maintenance, the network becomes the operational bottleneck to scale.

A New Layer Of Connectivity

A wired network simply can’t evolve at the same speed as the mobile economy. A fleet operator might need to open a new depot in another city, place drone nests closer to customers, or connect autonomous equipment at temporary industrial sites. Extending fiber to each location would involve trenching, permitting which are often cost and time intensive.

Wireless connectivity offers a faster and more flexible approach. Links can be installed without digging or waiting for permits, allowing operators to connect new sites quickly. Links can also be redeployed or expanded as fleets grow as their physical footprint expands dynamically.

Wireless optical communication (WOC) could provide that high-capacity bridge. Using narrow beams of light, it carries fiber-like capacity through the air between two points with a clear line of sight, up to 20 Gbps across distances of up to 20 kilometers. It can be installed on existing radio masts or buildings in a matter of hours.

For autonomous fleets, that creates a way to rapidly offload telemetry and operational data, upload new maps and models, and return high-value assets to work instead of leaving them waiting at the depot.

WOC isn’t magic though. Optical links still need line of sight, and heavy fog and rain can degrade their connectivity. That’s why serious deployments pair them with an RF path and engineer them for availability rather than simply assuming it. It won’t replace fiber, but it will extend fiber’s reach to the places fiber can’t go, and it’s getting smaller, faster, and more affordable as the technology moves from mechanical to solid-state beam steering with silicon photonics. Light is the answer.

The arrival of electric vehicles taught us to look beyond the machine and consider the infrastructure behind it. Autonomous machines will require us to do the same again, but this time what needs to be replenished isn’t just the machine’s battery – it’s the machine's experience, and from it, the shared intelligence of the entire fleet.

Robots are becoming extraordinarily good at navigating the physical world. We shouldn’t leave the final mile of their learning journey to someone carrying a hard drive across a parking lot.

Source: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/technology/artificial-intelligence/when-one-robot-learns-every-robot-knows-if-they-can-communicate/ar-AA2e3Vbv

Original Article: https://davidicke.com/2026/10/13/when-one-robot-learns-every-robot-knows-if-they-can-communicate/

Related:

...this is what “winning” and “20-D Chess” looks like: techno-fascism. And if you don’t agree and accept this voluntary enslavement in the name of “SI,” data centers, surveillance, tokenization and more, then you are the “enemy,”

The WinePress | substack.com/@thewinepress

President Donald Trump considers you an “enemy” if you don’t accept and use his new term for artificial intelligence, “Super Intelligence” (SI), following an executive order he signed along with a ‘treaty’ of sorts with a number of tech companies vowing industry protections.

On October 8th, Trump posted on Truth Social:

“The White House considers anyone that uses the term, “Artificial Intelligence,” as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, “Super Intelligence,” THE ENEMY! President DONALD J. TRUMP.”

Last month, Trump declared that AI would be renamed to SI instead, he announced on Truth Social and at the United Nations General Assembly. He said at the time “the use of the word artificial makes intelligence fake, it makes it sound fake. And it is not fake.”

Not long after that, Trump, via executive order, declared that SI is the new official term in the United States — “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence.”

EO #14434 states:

“The extraordinary technologies being pioneered by American innovators far exceed what was envisioned when the term “Artificial Intelligence” first came into use. The capabilities of today’s frontier systems do much more than imitate or automate discrete aspects of human intelligence. They increasingly amplify human ingenuity and unlock new forms of creativity, empowering Americans to achieve what was previously impossible across science, medicine, and nearly every other domain of human endeavor.

“As these capabilities continue to improve, they increasingly represent not merely artificial intelligence, but a new era of Super Intelligence.

“The terminology used by the Federal Government should reflect the transformative capabilities of these technologies and the limitless opportunities they create for the American people.

“Accordingly, the term “Super Intelligence” more appropriately captures the promise, potential, and rapidly advancing capabilities of these technologies.

“It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.”

“To the maximum extent permitted by law, executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory documents within the executive branch.”

Moreover, the official White House fact sheet reiterates why the administration is adamant about codifying so-called “SI” as law.

“The name Super Intelligence conveys the true capabilities of the technologies being developed today, unlocking new forms of human creativity and empowering Americans to achieve what was previously impossible—not simply imitating or automating human intelligence as is implied by the term “Artificial Intelligence.””

On top of that, President Trump and the heads of some of the largest AI and tech companies in the U.S. signed an “accord” that sets self-imposed guardrails and controls to safely self-regulate “SI.”

The treaty of sorts was signed by Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and its parent company Alphabet; Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic; Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta; Greg Brockman, co-founder and President of OpenAI; Elon Musk, founder and CEO of XAI, along head of Tesla, SpaceX, X (Twitter), Neuralink, and The Boring Company; and lastly Jensen Huang, CEO and founder of Nvidia.

Though the agreement was curiously not published on the White House website, it still made the rounds on social media and official archival websites.

The agreement states:

In order to build a positive future for the American people and the world, we believe every company is responsible for developing its own technology safely and in a way that builds trust with customers and the public.

This starts with every company that is training and deploying frontier models having robust internal processes and controls to ensure that their technology behaves as intended and that any issues are promptly identified and resolved. Therefore, in addition to any other precautions, we believe each company should implement the following four layers of controls and audits:(1) Implement robust internal controls to monitor the capabilities and alignment of its models during training and deployment around areas like cybersecurity, biosecurity, and chemical threats, and to ensure that its models do not hack or access technical systems in unintended ways.

(2) Empower an internal team to ensure all of the controls, monitoring, and detection are operating as intended, and that any issues are remediated.

(3) Partner with an independent external auditor or evaluator to carry out independent assessments of whether the controls, monitoring, and detection are operating as intended.

(4) Designate an independent committee of the board of directors to oversee and receive reports from the teams operating the controls and the internal and external auditors and evaluators, as well as to ensure any issues identified are remediated.

Together, these steps will give each company, its customers, and the public confidence that the technology is operating as intended.

The participating companies will meet regularly to establish standards and best practices to improve the safety of their systems.

Over time, it may make sense to codify these steps into laws or regulations. Regardless of whether this is required of companies, we believe that implementing these controls and audits is critical to ensuring a safe future for everyone, and each of our companies are committed to doing this.

However, the accord went viral for the wrong reasons as many noticed that there was a typo at the end of the accord, “President of the Unites States” [sic].

After the pact was signed, Trump, administration officials and the heads of these tech firms addressed the media and explained why they did this.

Trump posted a picture of who was at the luncheon event after the pact was signed. Other notable figures in attendance were Alex Karp and Shyam Sankar, CEO and President of Palantir; Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon; David Sacks, the now-former White House AI and crypto czar and member of the infamous “PayPal Mafia;” and more.

Afterwards, Trump and some of the heads of these companies gave more remarks to the press.

Trump once again promoted the necessity of data centers, among other things, floating out the idea of these companies who want to build them should provide a dividend to communities.

“The people are going to benefit directly, whether its teachers that get paid a bonus, whether its people that live in the community that get paid a dividend you could call it a dividend because a dividend sounds right, they are going to greatly benefit by what’s happened.”

“Data centers are bringing in a tremendous amount of money into the community, and the people now are going to benefit directly.”

Most notable was Elon Musk’s, who, standing next to Trump, heavily insinuated that people would be replaced at their jobs with robots and AI, and people would be given monthly allotted tokens as ‘income’ instead.

The question was asked “about abundance of the future because people looking at this will be worried, particularly laptop jobs, what what are they going to do in the future?,” the reporter asked.

Musk replied:

“Well, I think it is worth highlighting the positive benefits of AI, or SI, pardon me.

“Super Intelligence. I think by far the most likely outcome is an age of abundance, where we don’t have just universal basic income, we have universal high income.

“And people speak about the medical benefits, but maybe it’s worth talking a bit more about that. When you have robots and you have superintelligence, it means that everyone in the world can have better medical care than anyone here, including me. And wouldn’t that be wonderful?”

The reporter quipped, “Not if they haven't got a job.”

Musk then replied:

“Well, jobs are going to change. Jobs have always changed.

But being a computer used to be a job. There used to be buildings full of people doing calculations. But now digital computers do those tasks. I don’t think anyone is pining to go back and do calculations all day to do bank interest rates, which is what they used to do. So I think we’ll see an evolution of roles.

“And as the President has mentioned, it’s not as though unemployment has increased. In fact, there’s a tremendous demand for people. So I think the most likely outcome, and it’s probably worth looking at the most likely outcome, is one which is incredibly beneficial, and it’s a future that you... If you could look into the future, it is a future you would want.”

This is not the first time Musk has promoted this new way of life.

For example, in December 2025, Musk, sitting alongside Jensen Huang, promoted what he calls “universal high income” — a play-on-words of so-called “universal basic income,” where people are remitted a monthly allotted amount of money to live on; premised on the the concept that AI will automate most production and the public then gets a slice of the pie.

But at a forum hosted in Saudi Arabia, Musk stated:

“In the long term, where will things end up? Long term, I don’t know what long term is. Maybe it’s 10, 20 years, something like that. For me, that’s long term.

“My prediction is that work will be optional. It’ll be like playing sports or a video game or something like that. If you want to work, [it’s] the same way you can go to the store and just buy some vegetables, or you can grow vegetables in your backyard. It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, and some people still do it because they like growing vegetables.

“That will be what work is like, optional. And between now and then, there’s actually a lot of work to get to that point. I always recommend people read Yen Bank’s culture books to get a sense for what a probable positive AI future is like.

“And interestingly, in those books, money is no longer, doesn’t exist. It’s kind of interesting. And my guess is, if you go out long enough, assuming there’s a continued improvement in AI and robotics, which seems likely, the money will stop being relevant at some point in the future.

“There will still be constraints on power, like electricity and mass. The fundamental physics elements will still be constraints. But I think at some point, currency becomes irrelevant.”

Musk has promoted this socialist idea for many years, well before he became an open ally of President Trump’s, despite online claims that Musk and other transhumanists and technocrats were supposed libertarians and conservatives.

Trump and Democrats have increasingly called for socialized benefits coming from AI as well. The Trump administration is reportedly in talks to take stake in OpenAI, as they have already with computing, rare earths, and defense contractors.

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

Well, there you have it: this is what “winning” and “20-D Chess” looks like: techno-fascism. And if you don’t agree and accept this voluntary enslavement in the name of “SI,” data centers, surveillance, tokenization and more, then you are the “enemy,” our illustrious president says. No, HE is the enemy of truth and righteousness!

Acts 13:10 And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?

And you see that manifested as, if this unholy alliance isn’t bad enough, you have Musk up there, standing right next to Trump, telling you that you will own nothing and be happy, AI and robots are going to take your change, and will give you some monthly good-boy tokens credited to your digital smart wallet, as you walk around in an open-air prison being surveilled 24/7 everywhere you go.

This is not surprising that Musk would say this nor Trump passively going along with it. Trump, as I have pointed out several times previously, has said America will never become a socialist nation; which, in the Trump lexicon, means that we WILL become a socialist nation. We already were in many ways, but now definitely have become a techno-fascist and socialist economic zone.

And Musk — I have said for years that this guy is an absolute snake in the grass and tech bro, despite the mass-hypnosis by the mainstream and alternative media pundits convincing you he is another “white hat,” good guy billionaire who is going to help drain the swamp. I mean, how low must these people’s IQ scores be to fall for that tripe? But this stuff Musk is saying is stuff that he has been saying for years; and now El Trumpo signed-off on it. The Great Reset continues unmolested.

Trump, as I have documented, has already defended H-1Bs and expanding the visa program to replace Americans in the workforce and in universities, and has lauded robots replacing Americans in factories and will be counted as “job growth.”

This stupid treaty is more symbolic than anything else. Paper will put up with anything you put on it; and they couldn’t even avoid a typo right where Trump had to sign. That speaks volumes more than anything as to just how efficacious this pact is. It almost makes you wonder if that was done intentionally.

Why only those companies? Palantir and Amazon were represented at the luncheon but not in the pact. Oracle and others are nowhere to be found. So that just goes to show how feckless this pact is. Can’t impede the surveillance state!

Jeremiah 22:17 But thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppression, and for violence, to do it.

Original Article: https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/techno-fascism-trump-says-anyone

TapNewsWire.com | Pete Fairhurst

TheBurningPlatform.com

State of the Nation | stateofthenation.info

An Armchair Geopolitical Analyst

Honestly, you simply cannot make this stuff up!!!

Trump, Putin and Zelensky are not only proven CIA cutouts, they are stone-cold traitors to their respective nations—BIG TIME!

Why traitors?

For starters, both Zelensky and Putin have been leading and  perpetrating a long planned and highly organized genocide of millions of white Christian Slavic men since the very beginning of the Ukraine War, which has actually been defined by one mass-murdering meatgrinder after another.

As for Trump, he’s still fighting a war on behalf of arch-enemy Israel—a rogue Zionist state and apartheid nation.  In other words, he has been and is treasonously wasting American blood and treasure to support an extremely dangerous international crime syndicate that masquerades as a normal country while it systematically steals U.S. taxpayers’ money at every turn.

Not only that, but Trump really went of the beam and gave away the whole plot when he did this…..

Forget what these three clowns say, it’s what they do and don’t do that proves they are literally running a “Three Ring Circus” on the world community of nations, when they’re not playing “The Three Stooges” at home, and worse—“The Three Traitors”

Really, how does Chabad-controlled Putin agree to “make such a good deal” (with Yiddish accent, of course) with Chabad-controlled Trump when the U.S. Intelligence Community together with the U.S. Armed Forces are routinely and significantly facilitating the daily destruction of Russia via nonstop Ukrainian terrorism (overseen by Chabad-controlled Zelensky) and NATO acts of war?!?!?!

[All three; Trump, Putin and Zelensky are members of Chabad. See related article below]

Truly, the whole world has entered the final stages of End-Times Madness, and it appears that this debilitating psychological and physical malady will only get worse…until it can’t anymore because the entire planetary civilization has reached the proverbial event horizon.

How’s that for a grossly understated assessment of the current global geopolitical chessboard that’s been kicked over about 100 times since Trump’s second Inauguration Day?!

Back to the “diesel deal”.

So, while Trump & Sons are blowing up oil and gas refineries, tankers, pipelines and ports all over the Russian Motherland via the Ukraine-NATO terrorist organization, especially killing the Diesel Industry, Putin is still willing to cut a deal with these oil thieves and gas robbers.  Wow! Just WOW!!!

By the way, do these two clowns look like enemies or friends or [fake] frenemies?

Meanwhile,

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has condemned Donald Trump’s announcement of a deal to import Russian diesel into the US.

Zelensky called it a gift to Russian President Vladimir Putin that amounts to “an investment in a war that must be ended, not prolonged”, a position quickly backed by Ukraine’s European allies.

Trump said Putin had agreed to release 300,000 tonnes of diesel immediately “to the American and global marketplace” followed by 500,000 tonnes in November and a further one million after that.

It is understood that the US Treasury is suspending sanctions on Russian diesel exports until 7 April as part of the deal, but other assets like those in American banks are still frozen.

Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that a further three million tonnes of Russian diesel would be delivered “within a short period”, dependent on the condition of its refineries, which have been attacked by Ukraine.

Putin later said that Russia, which introduced a ban on diesel exports earlier this year, was willing to supply both the US and global markets with oil and petroleum products, but his statement did not specify amounts.

Zelensky said Russia would repay the diesel with “further terror”.

“We count on America’s fair support for our defence of life, for our defence of people in Ukraine – and on the United States having a correspondingly strong conversation with Russia. A strong one, not a weak one,” he wrote.

He later pointed to deadly overnight strikes on Zaporizhzhia and Kyiv as Russia expressing “its thanks” for the agreement.

Analysts have questioned whether Russia is capable of providing that quantity of diesel and the extent to which doing so will ease prices for American consumers.

Like we said, you just can’t make this shit up, especially when the primary sponsor of all three sides of the war is Chabad, which is actually the main director, producer and screenwriter for this global End-Times production.  How here’s the well-concealed script:

Source: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/10/11/the-three-ring-circus-starring/#more-431866

Source: https://stateofthenation.info/?p=83587

Original Article: https://tapnewswire.com/2026/10/12/the-three-ring-circus-starring/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Related:

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

This is silent gene therapy, packaged as a beauty product.

Telegram | @Vatican_Archives | Jacob

Bill Gates is now bypassing the needle and going straight for your skin. Scientists funded by him are integrating mRNA technology into lotions and creams – without your knowledge, without your consent.

No warning. No labeling. Just absorption through the skin.

Welcome to Phase 2 of the depopulation agenda. The war on your DNA has reached your bathroom shelf. They’ve skipped the injection – now it goes under your skin.

Your moisturizer may be doing more than just keeping your skin soft. It could be rewriting your cells and hacking your biology from the outside in.

Backed by Gates’ funding, researchers are celebrating “transdermal mRNA delivery” – a technology that uses creams and gels to introduce genetic material through the skin.

No injection.
No permission.
Just passive absorption.

You’re being bio-hacked – without ever having to roll up your sleeve.

This is silent gene therapy, packaged as a beauty product.

What once required a needle now simply penetrates through your pores. And the consequences? Permanent. Undetectable. Irreversible. Everyday rituals are becoming infiltration strategies. Every application could impair your body’s ability to reproduce, heal, or defend itself.

This isn’t skincare. This is molecular warfare.

And the FDA? Silent. The media? Bought. The products? Labeled as harmless.

But the truth? Your skin is now the battlefield.

Gates has always pushed for population control, but now he has found the perfect delivery system:

No regulations. No questions. No trace.

You’re not just caring for your skin. You’re submitting.
You’re not making a choice. You’re being reprogrammed.

It’s genetic sabotage disguised as healthcare innovation. And it’s happening right now – not in some laboratory, but in your own home. You are the guinea pig. Your skin is the gateway. And Bill Gates continues to play God.

Original Article: https://t.me/Vatican_Archives/684

Technocracy.news

Victor Tangermann | futurism.com

Technocrats are stealing the world’s data for their own AI training advantage, while killing the golden goose in the process, as this article makes clear. That lack of ethics and morality is seen everywhere in the world of Technocracy. For instance, read the Crucible of Tokens to learn about the biggest heist of private property in world history. They have no conscience about doing anything wrong, and that is the problem. Read up on psychopathy! ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.

Recently unredacted legal documents and depositions in the New York Times‘ lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI revealed something extraordinary: executives knew full well of the destructive powers of AI when they rushed to launch products featuring the tech in the wake of the explosive success of OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Internal Microsoft documents quoted by the newspaper’s lawyers warned of an ugly reality now playing out across the entire economy: “doom loops,” in which AI monetizes the work of human creatives while undermining the economic systems that funded their work in the first place.

“Our AI content strategy has started a ‘doom loop’ that will hurt the performance of our models and the entire web at the same time,” one internal Microsoft document reads. “It is highly unusual that an end-product threatens the economic foundations of its essential suppliers, but that is the situation we have created for our LLM business with respect to its ‘content supply chain.’”

The closer you look, the more you see doom loops everywhere. Journalists, for example, used to publish work under the assumption that online platforms would drive readership to them. But now, tools like ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini simply summarize their articles without sending readers to their sites, sparking a crisis that seems poised to wipe out the independent media.

Similar stories are playing out across other industries, from music to filmmaking. Writ large, many are concerned that AI will eventually be strong enough to wipe out huge numbers of jobs, creating a situation in which unemployed consumers won’t have the funds to support the economy.

The irony, as the Microsoft document pointed out, is that the AI industry is a snake eating its own tail: the very products that it’s pushing on users rely on fresh cultural content even as they destroy the economic incentives to create it.

It’s also a dire situation for the open web, which recently celebrated the macabre turning point of being dominated by more AI slop than human-authored content. As companies — most notably Google — are fundamentally changing the way users interact with the web, more and more newspapers, media outlets, and local news stations are seriously struggling to make ends meet.

Worse yet, as the legal documents in the NYT‘s copyright lawsuit showed, insiders admitted that the entire operation is built on theft.

“Millions of people around the world will soon consider large models ‘hoovering up’ all their work to be an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” an internal Microsoft document admitted.

Plenty of other creative industries are also feeling the pressure as AI-related doom loops continue to undermine livelihoods. According to the latest data from the US Bureau of Labor statistics, it’s a bloodbath — with more than 200,000 jobs in “creative” industries having been lost over the last four years alone, roughly the time since OpenAI launched ChatGPT.

AI-generated music is rapidly crowding out human-produced tracks on streaming services, forcing platforms to figure out where to draw the line. Some have implemented hard and fast rules, while others continue to allow users to exploit algorithms with slop.

Hollywood studios are also doubling down on AI while protesting actors struggle to have their voices heard. Many of them fear that their likeness or voice could soon be rendered worthless, representing an existential threat to their livelihoods.

Even the job market is embroiled in its own doom loop. More and more desperate job seekers are turning to AI to brush up their resumes and manipulate AI-powered job portals, while recruiters are drowning in a wall of almost identical applications.

“We’ve got this tragic situation where each side has a problem,” applicant tracking system company Greenhouse CEO Daniel Chait told Wired. “They’re using AI to solve their own problem, but in ways that make the problem worse.”

“And so more AI use begets more AI use, to no one’s benefit,” he added. “The more it’s happening, the worse it gets.”

Similarly, the use of AI in the classroom has skyrocketed, with students using the tech to complete their homework, offloading their cognitive faculties to the machine. Meanwhile, their teachers are using AI to come up with assignments, slowly effacing the human in the loop. Educators who bristle at the idea of using the tech are finding themselves at odds with school administrators.

The effects AI has had on education has been nothing short of a disaster. A recent study by the Brookings Institution’s Center for Universal Education concluded that the risks of using generative AI in education massively outweighed the benefits. The associated dangers have never been more apparent, with educators warning that college students are rapidly losing the ability to read.

Proponents of AI, including OpenAI and Microsoft’s lawyers in the ongoing New York Times lawsuit, argue that AI brings something new to the table. They argue that the output of AI models is sufficiently differentiated from the original content it draws on, falling under “fair use,” a longstanding doctrine in US copyright law.

Whether this argument will hold up in court remains to be seen. Besides, we’ve already seen companies, like Anthropic, settle for billions of dollars after being found to have violated copyright laws.

But considering how the tech is simultaneously undermining the very economic systems that produced the data they need to exist in the first place, that may not be a winning strategy in the long run.

By ripping out the carpet from underneath many parts of the economy — and reaping all the financial gains from it — the AI industry is trapping itself in a doom loop of its own creation, a cynical strategy that won’t benefit anybody but those at the very top who kicked the ladder down behind them.

Source: https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-is-creating-doom-loops-all-over-the-economy

Original Article: https://www.technocracy.news/ai-is-creating-doom-loops-all-over-the-economy/

Telegram | Forbidden Truth

A medical intelligence alert in October 2026 holds that governments and military biodefense programs are already developing more than 21 plague vaccines across self-amplifying RNA, mRNA, DNA, viral-vector, bacterial-vector, subunit and live-attenuated platforms. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, is the source.

Britain, he says, is advancing self-amplifying RNA plague vaccines, built to copy themselves inside cells. Israel has produced two mRNA injections aimed at plague. The United States is pursuing DNA-based candidates with military funding, plus bacterial-vector shots. Viral-vector candidates are reported in Britain and the United States, on a platform related to the AstraZeneca COVID injection. Subunit vaccines are underway in the United States, Britain and China. Live-attenuated programs are held in Russia, China and the United States.

The picture is not one quiet laboratory. It is a multi-nation hedge, paid for by governments and militaries. Hulscher argues it is strange that so many resources went into plague vaccines when plague had not been an active public threat, and that the buildup now sits against a scare out of Russia. He does not claim a catastrophe is confirmed. The Russian situation could prove a nothing burger, or a cover-up.

Readers following the October 2026 Kremlin dossier on aerosolized plague research will find the overlap hard to ignore. More than 21 candidates were already moving before the public was told to look. A shelf of saRNA, mRNA, DNA and vector shots across Britain, Israel, the United States, China and Russia raises a question about what planners believed they might face.

Hulscher’s line is blunt. He has said he will not take any of them. If the concern becomes serious, his preference is antibiotics rather than vaccination. He cites doxycycline and a claimed 97 percent survival rate in a randomized trial of plague patients, given as his claim and not settled here. The open question is whether that scope and that military money deserve more scrutiny.

More than 21 candidates. Multiple platforms. Five countries. Government and military funding, and a Russia scare over the top. That does not prove a specific outbreak was anticipated. On Hulscher’s account, plague was already treated as serious enough to justify heavy investment before most people were looking. How extensive has that preparedness become, and why.

Original Article: https://t.me/c/3233625802/295

Related: