TapNewsWire.com |  Pete Fairhurst

LewRockwell.com

Donald Jeffries | I Protest |donaldjeffries.substack.com

The 25th anniversary of 9/11 has really brought out the trolls. I don’t know how many of them are paid, but X has been invaded by illogic, as an army of shills attempts lamely to prop up one of their most important lies. It’s the same insidious hivemind mentality that insists we ignore every giant cultural elephant destroying the room.

In September, 1976, as a result of the new Freedom of Information Act, a revealing April 1, 1967 CIA memo was released, titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Report.” April 1? Was this one of their inside jokes? At any rate, the memo begins by stating “Our concern,” which revolves around the majority of the public disbelieving the ridiculous conclusions of the Warren Commission. Now why would the CIA be “concerned” about people failing to accept the government’s conclusions? A key passage notes: “Just because of the standing of the Commissioners, efforts to impugn their rectitude and wisdom tend to cast doubt on the whole leadership of American society.” Bingo, as my wife might say. This is the crux of the biscuit, and why “conspiracy theorists” are continuously demonized. Thought Criminals like me do indeed seek to “cast doubt on the whole leadership of American society.” They whine about allegations that Oswald worked for the Agency. He did. He had a 201 file.

In the section headlined “Action,” the CIA helpfully advises that the subject of the assassination not be brought up. You know, like a young Don Jeffries was doing at every possible public gathering. In a tip of the hat to Operation Mockingbird, the Agency suggests that Conspiracy Deniers “discuss the publicity problem with liaison and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the Warren Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation…Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation. To employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose…” We’d have to update the language here. Circa 2026, this would mean employing propaganda assets on late night talk shows, comedians, and social media “influencers” with lots of followers.

The sentiments there are universal, and apply to everything in the same sphere as the assassination. I’m culturally appropriating “Denier” from them. The majority of our fellow human beings are Conspiracy Deniers. This means essentially that they are capable of denying their own senses. As Winston Smith told us in 1984, “The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” That is exactly what these Conspiracy Deniers are doing every day. Rejecting the evidence of their eyes and ears. From denying the racial reality of ghetto culture, and the wildly disproportionate power of the non-Irish, to swallowing every incredibly stupid and impossible theory from single-bullet to trickle-down. From saluting a flag that now stands for foreign misbehavior and a domestic police state, to trudging to the polls, in rain, or sleet, or snow, to vote for the worst people on earth to not represent them. Voting harder. Mistaken at the top of their lungs.

Although the ones we’re saddled with today are especially obtuse and unreasoning, they’ve always comprised most of the public. Orwell again characterized them perfectly with his sheep in Animal Farm. That’s another term we owe Orwell for. The Sheeple. They’re the unwitting, unthinking army of the conspirators. They refused to join the courageous Daniel Shays just after our War for Independence, when he started a rebellion over the mistreatment, and nonpayment of colonial soldiers. They were the ones reporting their neighbors to Lincoln’s goons during the War Between the States, resulting in them being thrown into makeshift prisons, without any due process. They bought all the false flags, from “Remember the Maine” to “Remember Pearl Harbor,” and their voices were always the loudest. They cheered on the Gulf War, in defense of a tiny oligarchy (Kuwait) none of them had even heard of before. They didn’t care that the government killed the Branch Davidians. They were “crazy.”

As you can see by the illustration above, we are still vastly outnumbered. The fact that this source claims only 47 percent of Americans believe JFK was killed by a conspiracy is astounding. It may be just one of their countless lies, but there is at least some truth in it. In the 1970s, polls showed close to 90 percent of people believed in a JFK conspiracy. Only 19 percent believe in chemtrails? Are they refusing to look up at the sky? Only 23 percent think 9/11 was an Inside Job? If these numbers are remotely accurate, then we have an even more monumental task in front of us. With an increasing reliance on the internet, and not the state controlled television networks, for news and information, how can it be possible that so many continue to be Conspiracy Deniers? Just how obvious do the conspiracies have to be? The coverups are purposefully transparent; they want you to know. They enjoy toying with us. And yet, no matter how obvious they make it, the masses absolutely refuse to think.

When DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey’s little black book of important political persons was revealed, she went on Alex Jones and publicly proclaimed she would never kill herself. And then she was found hanged. The Conspiracy Deniers believed she took her own life. Virginia Giuffre said the same thing. You know, the girl who was ignored by everyone for years, and then suddenly became a martyr for the ones who survived being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. The Conspiracy Deniers don’t think she was murdered, either. They don’t think anyone connected to anything politically significant has ever been murdered. As the authorities always quickly determine, “no evidence of foul play.” John Hinckley shot Reagan to impress underage nymphet Jodie Foster. Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk because he was a transgender in love. Or was it a “Furry” in love? They really don’t even need the “friendly assets” the CIA talked about in 1967. The Conspiracy Deniers handle things perfectly fine on their own.

Most of you have heard me talk about the overriding narrative that rules us; the conspiracy to deny any significance, any spiritual reason for our existence. A conspiracy against the supernatural. A conspiracy against God. They push randomness relentlessly. We are just a mere speck, on a slightly larger speck, in an endless universe. Black Holes. Quasars. Primordial soup. Lots of empty “scientific” mumbo jumbo, which somehow impresses the Conspiracy Deniers. Just don’t mention miracles. Or morality. Or eternal redemption. Or utter the name Jesus Christ, unless it’s in vain and you’re not a believer. Then it’s really, really cool. But worship Einstein all you want. A half illiterate who never learned to tie his shoes. But a non-Irish icon. Ask a real genius, Nikola Tesla, what he thought of him. The Conspiracy Deniers have no problem with the missing Tesla files, confiscated by Donald Trump’s uncle for the government. Sure, many of them have TDS themselves, but that is irrelevant.

Some “conspiracy theories” are absurd. The Black “community” believes in many of them. They have basically nailed the larger truth that our leaders are at war with us, but they think they’re only at war with Black people. They believe that random “White Supremacists” are kidnapping random Blacks off the streets and lynching them. And that the police are involved in covering this up. Now, the police are usually involved in covering up something, most frequently the actions of their out of control officers. But no one is lynching Blacks. No one is even lynching Thought Criminals, as far as I know. They knock some of us off, every so often, just as a reminder. I also confess to being confused by the Mandela Effect thing. Some Millennials contend that Nelson Mandela actually died before he did, and this somehow has resulted in other “truths” being changed. Like the Berenstain Bears books, for example. I don’t pretend to understand. But then again, I don’t think Mandela was any kind of hero, either.

It’s always been easier to just call names. Debate is difficult, especially when you have no facts on your side. This is the dilemma the average Conspiracy Denier must deal with. So they scoff at us “nut jobs.” Or “wackos.” Or their favorite, “retards.” During the COVID psyop, “dangerous” became a popular term of derision. Lots of people called me that. The more conventionally educated ones will fall back upon appeals to authority. They will invariably mention the “someone would have talked” nonsense. “Do you now how many people would have had to be involved” in faking the moon landing, or covering up 9/11? “You can’t keep a secret in Washington, D.C.” is another chestnut. Actually, D.C. is full of secrets, official and otherwise. Every still classified JFK assassination document attests to that. The redactions on every begrudgingly released file attests to that. All the dead whistleblowers, who were obviously “talking,” attest to that. Someone has always talked, but they’ve been murdered or ignored.

Russia! Russia! Russia! China! China! China! Islam did it! The sheep in Animal Farm chanted “Four legs good, two legs better.” They bleated out the naysayers. The critical thinkers. That’s what our Sheeple do. They chant “USA! USA!” to drown out any discouraging words. Maybe they’ll break into an impromptu version of Proud to be an American or Lift Every Voice and Sing, the so-called Black national anthem, depending upon the crowd. They both serve the same purpose. Where ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise. Trumpenstein is now promising a $5,000 check to every American if the Republicans win the midterm elections. Only his cult believes he will actually do this. There are Conspiracy Deniers on the Left, and an increasing number on the Right as well. These would be the ones cheering on Trumpenstein’s dismissal of the Epstein Files as a “Democrat hoax.” The files that reveal our illustrious leaders are in fact barbaric cannibals. Try trotting that one out at a party in front of Conspiracy Deniers.

To be a Conspiracy Denier, you have to endure political speeches. All political speeches. And consider that the empty rhetoric about “getting the country moving,” or “making it great” is innocent, standard political boiler plate. Which we should accept with a shrug and a smile. Sure, they never keep their promises. Sure, they never do anything which helps those who actually need help. Sure, they serve AIPAC and other shadowy special interests. Sure, you “can’t vote them out.” And besides, every one either party picks to run is the same. Never independent. Never principled. Always pro-Zionist. And always anti-”conspiracy theories.” Where’s the randomness of at least one honest leader every few decades or so? Because there’s no conspiracy to stop them, right? Wouldn’t the law of averages dictate that once in a while, we’d have someone in power who actually wanted to do good things? But we’ve accepted that, on those rare occasions, they simply eliminate the Huey Longs and John F. Kennedys.

Conspiracy Deniers believe that the Air Force “mistakenly” identified a weather balloon as a “Flying Saucer” at Roswell. They believe the Dallas deputies who found a rifle on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository on November 22, 1963 both “mistakenly” misidentified it as a German Mauser. They believe the BATF had to launch a massive raid on the Branch Davidians, when they could have confronted leader David Koresh at any time in a local store. They believe all those witnesses- every one who identified Timothy McVeigh- was “mistaken” about him being in the company of “John Doe #2” in Oklahoma City. They believe that it was a coincidence that dictionaries changed the definition of “vaccine” in the wake of the warp speed vax that didn’t prevent “COVID.” They think millions died from this phantom disease, but no one died from the deadly vaccine. They believe JFK, Jr. and all the other dead Kennedys were “reckless.” They believe the people “won” when Nixon resigned.

I often feel like the little boy in the old fairy tale, who is the only one willing to point out that the emperor is wearing no clothes. We often forget that, like all whistleblowers and truthtellers, he was overruled by the crowd, who continued to ignore that the emperor was naked. Those of us who are trying to awaken the Conspiracy Deniers have to understand that we’re fighting centuries of “normie” conditioning. Especially for the last 100 years or so, we’re competing with intense propaganda the likes of which the world has never seen. Security cameras, which are everywhere, always malfunctioning whenever something important happens. Or allegedly happens, because an increasing number of doubters believe it’s all fake and scripted. Cell phone cameras, which oddly are never deployed during mass shootings, or supposed “anti-Semitic” behavior. You have your “Holocaust Deniers.” Your “COVID Deniers.” Your “Climate Change Deniers.” Your “Election Deniers.”

Well, I can have my Conspiracy Deniers. I don’t care if someone calls me a “conspiracy theorist.” Sticks and stones, and all that. But I have no “theory.” Building 7 isn’t a “theory.” The massive disparity of wealth isn’t a “theory.” No one in the Deep State being prosecuted isn’t a “theory.” The disclosures from the very limited DOGE program weren’t a “theory.” There is massive waste, fraud and abuse in our government. And those who run the government, the business world, and society at large are massively corrupt criminals. We’ve been vindicated, although they won’t admit it. Our friends owe us an apology. Our family members own us an apology. The world owes us an apology. Most humans can’t apologize, however. They’re too proud. In this case, an apology would mean they were wrong to trust those in charge. Wrong to ridicule and sneer at those who tried to enlighten them. To paraphrase the syrupy sentiment from Love Story: slavery means never having to say you’re sorry.

Source: https://donaldjeffries.substack.com/p/in-the-land-of-the-conspiracy-deniers

Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/09/no_author/in-the-land-of-the-conspiracy-deniers/

Original Article: https://tapnewswire.com/2026/09/16/in-the-land-of-the-conspiracy-deniers/

Related:

DavidIcke.com | Gareth Icke

John and Nisha Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute | Rutherford.org

“What if the rights and principles guaranteed in the Constitution have been so distorted in the past 200 years as to be unrecognizable by the Founders? What if the government was the reason we don’t have a Constitution anymore? What if freedom’s greatest hour of danger is now?”—Andrew P. Napolitano

What’s the point in celebrating the Constitution one day a year if we permit the government to violate it the other 364?

September 17 marks the anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution, a document designed not merely to establish a government but to restrain it.

Yet restraint is in increasingly short supply.

Across the political spectrum, Americans continue to tolerate abuses of power so long as those abuses are carried out by the “right” people, against the “wrong” people, or in the name of some emergency deemed too important to question.

That is how constitutional government dies.

Not all at once. Not with the Constitution formally abolished or the Bill of Rights ripped from the National Archives.

It dies by degrees: through executive power that expands while congressional authority withers; emergency powers that never quite disappear; wars waged with little regard for constitutional restraints; surveillance systems capable of tracking whole populations; federal agents empowered to operate with ever less accountability; military forces normalized on American streets; and courts that too often allow questions of standing, immunity and procedure to determine whether unconstitutional conduct will ever be confronted on its merits.

Every such precedent makes the next abuse easier. Every exception becomes a justification. Every temporary power becomes harder to claw back.

And every time Americans excuse an unconstitutional act because they approve of the person wielding the power, they help dismantle another guardrail meant to protect them when someone they distrust eventually takes control.

That is the danger we face.

The Constitution was never intended to depend upon the goodwill of those in power.

Quite the opposite.

Those who drafted the Constitution understood that power corrupts, that governments inevitably seek more authority, and that liberty survives only when power is divided, constrained, challenged and made answerable to the people.

The Constitution creates friction intentionally.

It makes government stop and obtain a warrant. It makes prosecutors prove their case. It makes presidents answer to Congress. It makes the military subordinate to civilian government. It protects unpopular speech precisely when those in power most want it silenced. It recognizes that there are places government simply has no legitimate authority to go.

Yet one by one, those restraints have been weakened, bypassed or treated as antiquated obstacles to efficient government.

Consider how quickly the extraordinary becomes ordinary.

Troops deployed to the nation’s capital in response to a supposed crime emergency remain long after the so-called emergency has passed, with the Pentagon preparing for the National Guard presence to continuethrough the end of President Trump’s term.

Sweeping surveillance technologies enable police to identify and track people based not on individualized suspicion but merely on where their cell phones happened to be at a particular time.

Federal immigration agents have been given unprecedented resources and authority while allegations mount of excessive force, unlawful arrests, surveillance, intimidation and constitutional violations.

Presidents increasingly invoke emergencies, national security and expansive interpretations of executive authority to do what once would have required meaningful congressional participation.

Meanwhile, the constitutional mechanisms intended to restrain government often operate too slowly—or not at all.

By the time the courts decide whether the government overstepped its authority, the deed may already be done, the troops already deployed, the people already detained, the data already collected, the building already demolished, the war already underway.

That is government unchained.

Here is the uncomfortable truth: the government did not accomplish this alone.

The power of the police state depends upon a populace willing to tolerate it.

Remember: when it comes to the staggering loss of civil liberties, the Constitution hasn’t changed. Rather, it is the American people who have changed.

Too many Americans have come to view constitutional restraints not as protections against tyranny but as inconveniences that stand in the way of getting what they want.

If a president they support circumvents Congress, they call it leadership. If a president they oppose does the same thing, they call it tyranny.

If government censorship silences their opponents, they cheer. If the machinery turns against them, they suddenly rediscover the First Amendment.

If federal agents abuse people they regard as dangerous, criminal or undesirable, constitutional niceties seem unnecessary. If they become the target, they demand due process.

This is how freedom becomes partisan. It is also how freedom dies.

The Constitution is neutral when it comes to politics.

It does not recognize Republican rights and Democratic rights, conservative freedoms and liberal freedoms, rights for citizens we approve of and lesser protections for those we fear or dislike.

The Fourth Amendment does not ask how you voted before protecting you against unreasonable searches. The First Amendment does not require that your speech be popular. Due process does not exist only for sympathetic defendants. Religious freedom does not belong exclusively to Christians, Jews, Muslims or any other favored faith. And the separation of powers was not written merely to restrain presidents from the opposing political party.

These safeguards exist because power cannot be trusted.

The greatest threat to constitutional government may not be that Americans have stopped believing in rights. It is that too many now believe rights should depend on whose rights are at stake.

That lesson should have been reinforced over the past 25 years.

In the name of national security after 9/11, Americans accepted sweeping surveillance powers, secret watchlists, militarized policing and an expanding government infrastructure capable of tracking and monitoring ordinary people.

What began as extraordinary powers aimed at terrorism became part of the machinery of everyday government.

In fact, technology has made it possible for government to exercise powers of surveillance and control that the architects of the Constitution could never have imagined.

Yet there are also reminders that constitutional resistance still matters.

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court held that police conduct a Fourth Amendment “search” when they obtain historical cell phone location data through a geofence warrant—a significant check on a form of digital dragnet surveillance capable of turning anyone carrying a smartphone into a government suspect.

A federal appeals court also upheld restrictions on immigration raids at certain houses of worship after religious communities demonstrated that the threat of enforcement was driving worshippers away and disrupting religious practice.

Most recently, a 7-2 Supreme Court rejected President Trump’s attempt to restrict mail-in ballots in advance of the 2026 midterm elections.

These victories matter.

They remind us that constitutional government is not entirely lost.

They also remind us of something even more important: rights have meaning only when somebody is willing to assert them. They survive when a homeowner refuses an unlawful search, when a citizen records police misconduct, when a congregation challenges government interference, when a parent questions what information a school is collecting about a child, or when a community forces officials to justify their actions in public.

You have no rights unless you exercise them. And you cannot exercise your rights unless you know what those rights are.

That should concern us because civic ignorance has become a national epidemic.

Too many Americans cannot identify the basic protections contained in the Bill of Rights, explain the separation of powers, or understand why the Founders deliberately made it difficult for any one branch of government to act without checks and balances.

According to the 2026 Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center, over a third of U.S. adults (35%) cannot name all three branches of the governmentand under half can name four of the five rights protected by the First Amendment. Of the five First Amendment rights, only freedom of speech is identified by more than half of survey respondents.

That ignorance has consequences.

A people who do not understand why government power must be limited will eventually surrender those limits whenever fear, anger, convenience or political loyalty makes them seem burdensome.

Thomas Jefferson understood the danger: a nation cannot expect to be both ignorant and free.

Those who gave us the Constitution understood something else as well: liberty cannot be preserved by politicians alone.

It was no idle happenstance that the Constitution begins with three powerful words: “We the People.”

The government exists at the behest of the citizenry, not the other way around.

That means “We the People” have responsibilities that extend far beyond showing up at the polls every few years.

Voting is not enough.

Freedom requires participation. It requires knowing your rights and exercising them. It requires speaking out even when it is unpopular to do so.

It requires demanding warrants, challenging government surveillance, recording police activity where the law allows, serving on juries, attending local government meetings, questioning officials, filing public records requests, supporting constitutional challenges, teaching children their rights, and refusing to let political loyalty override constitutional principle.

It means insisting that Congress act like a separate branch of government rather than a presidential cheering section. It means demanding that courts provide meaningful constitutional remedies while there is still something left to remedy.

It means refusing to allow emergency powers to become ordinary powers. And it means opposing unconstitutional government power even when that power is wielded by politicians we support.

None of this is easy.

Representative government is hard work.

It requires a citizenry willing to stay informed, resist manipulation, question authority, and accept that constitutional limits may sometimes prevent government from easily doing things we might want it to do.

That inconvenience is the point.

The Constitution was designed to make tyranny difficult. As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, our job is to make sure it stays that way.

So get outraged. Get informed. Get involved.

Get down to your local city council and school board. Get your objections down on paper. Get your representatives to pay attention. Get your children to know their rights. Get your local police to honor the Constitution. Get your media to act as watchdogs for the people rather than lapdogs for those in power.

Most of all, stop waiting for someone else to save the republic.

The courts cannot do it alone. Congress will not do it for us. No president, political party or election will permanently safeguard freedoms that the people themselves are unwilling to defend.

The Constitution is not self-executing.

Its words have power only when “We the People” breathe life into them.

Know your rights. Exercise your rights. Defend your rights.

If not, you will lose them.

The Constitution can’t protect you if you don’t protect it.

Source: https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_constitution_cant_protect_you_if_you_dont_protect_it

Image: Source [Edited using ChatGTP]

Original Article: https://davidicke.com/2026/09/16/the-constitution-cant-protect-you-if-you-dont-protect-it/

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

The 2028 Digital ID Deadline Approaches

LewRockwell,com

Madge Waggy | MadgeWaggy.blogspot.com

Something shifts beneath the surface of ordinary life. Not with announcements or spectacle, but through the quiet consolidation of systems that now track, verify, and gatekeep nearly every exchange between citizens and the institutions they rely upon. By 2028, according to timelines established by international bodies and echoed in domestic policy papers, Americans will face a choice that is not really a choice at all: accept a federally standardized Digital ID or find yourself locked out of the economy you helped build.

This deadline is not speculative. The World Bank, the United Nations Development Programme, and the World Economic Forum have all converged on 2028 as the target for universal digital identity implementation. Within the United States, federal agencies have accelerated pilot programs linking biometric data to financial access, travel privileges, and social services. What appears as technological modernization is, upon closer inspection, the construction of a comprehensive control system—one where participation in society requires continuous verification, and where verification can be revoked without appeal.

The warning signs have accumulated for years, visible to anyone willing to look past the marketing language of convenience and security. Contactless payments normalized the idea that physical currency is suspicious. Vaccine passports established the precedent that health data serves as an access credential. Banking apps demonstrated that accounts can freeze instantly based on algorithmic risk assessments or political criteria. Each precedent seemed isolated. Taken together, they form a clear trajectory toward a society where identity itself becomes a conditional privilege rather than a fixed right.

We are not discussing a distant dystopia. The infrastructure is being built now, in real time, through partnerships between government agencies and technology firms that operate with minimal public scrutiny. The consequences of this transition will not be temporary adjustments but permanent alterations to the conditions of freedom itself. To understand what is at stake requires looking honestly at the mechanisms being assembled, the dependencies being engineered, and the alternatives that are rapidly disappearing.

How Digital ID Actually Works

1. Digital ID functions as a gateway mechanism rather than mere identification—a switch that can be toggled to sever individuals from essential services without judicial oversight or evidentiary standards.
2. Biometric integration, including facial recognition, retinal scanning, and behavioral analysis, creates immutable identifiers that cannot be discarded or temporarily borrowed, eliminating the anonymity that cash transactions and informal economies once preserved.
3. Cross-referencing capabilities allow real-time correlation of location data, purchasing patterns, social associations, and digital communications, constructing predictive behavioral models that anticipate dissent before it materializes into action.
4. Technical architecture relies on blockchain and distributed ledger technologies that claim immutability as a feature, meaning erroneous data entries or punitive designations become permanent elements of one’s digital record.
5. Private sector participation ensures that compliance extends beyond government mandates into corporate policy, where exclusion from banking, housing, and employment can be enforced through Terms of Service rather than legislative action.

The implementation proceeds through incremental acclimatization. Initially, Digital ID emerges as optional convenience—a faster lane through airport security, a streamlined method for tax filing. Early adopters receive minor privileges that validate the system for skeptics. Then comes soft mandate: certain services become available exclusively through digital verification, justified through appeals to security or fraud prevention. Finally, the hard deadline arrives, the 2028 threshold where non-participation becomes synonymous with non-existence within the formal economy.

Biometric capture represents the most irreversible aspect of this transition. Unlike passwords, biological characteristics cannot be changed if compromised. Once your iris pattern or facial geometry enters centralized databases, it persists indefinitely, accessible to systems and actors you never authorized. The convenience of unlocking your phone with a glance extends seamlessly into accessing your funds, your transportation, your medical care. Each verification provides data. Each glance refines the model of who you are, what you want, where you go.

Recent years have demonstrated how these systems function in practice. Canadian authorities froze the bank accounts of protesting truckers without judicial process. British citizens discovered that certain political donations triggered financial surveillance. American businesses learned that ideological deviation from prevailing narratives could result in debanking and commercial exclusion. These were not aberrations. They were rehearsals for systematic financial control through Digital ID infrastructure.

Cash Is Disappearing, and Taking Privacy With It

Paper currency and metal coinage represent the final domain of transactional privacy—the last space where exchange occurs without intermediaries, surveillance, or permission. Its elimination constitutes not merely logistical change but a fundamental redefinition of money itself, from tangible asset to conditional privilege.

Physical cash carries properties that digital systems cannot replicate: immediacy, finality, anonymity. When you hand a twenty-dollar bill to a merchant, the transaction completes without third-party verification. No bank records the exchange. No algorithm flags the purchase for analysis. No institution maintains the capacity to reverse the transfer or freeze the funds. This directness offends control systems because it escapes monitoring.

The campaign against cash proceeds through multiple vectors. Banks cite storage costs. Governments cite tax evasion concerns. Economists cite inefficiency. Each argument contains partial truth, sufficient to mask the deeper agenda: the elimination of economic activity that escapes surveillance, taxation, and administrative oversight.

When money exists only as database entries, you possess not wealth but conditional access. The distinction matters. True ownership implies control—your property remains yours regardless of external opinion. Conditional access implies permission—your resources remain available only so long as you maintain favorable standing with gatekeepers.

Consider the implications of total digitization. Every transaction becomes data. Every purchase enters your behavioral profile. The books you buy, the medications you need, the establishments you frequent, the hours you keep—all recorded, categorized, analyzed. Patterns emerge. Predictions form. And predictions enable preemptive intervention. The system need not wait for you to commit a crime; it can identify statistical probability and adjust your access accordingly.

The elimination of cash also destroys the informal economy that has sustained communities through turbulence. Side jobs paid in cash. Yard sales conducted with neighbors. Charitable giving that leaves no paper trail. Emergency reserves hidden in homes. These practices, essential to resilience and independence, become impossible when all value flows through monitored channels. The grandmother who slips cash to a struggling grandchild, the neighbor who pays for informal childcare, the teenager who earns under-the-table wages for yard work—all these transactions enter the light of surveillance, taxed and tracked and stripped of human immediacy.

Artificial Intelligence Is Now the Gatekeeper

Machine learning algorithms do not merely process data; they generate reality. They classify, categorize, and condemn through statistical correlation that requires neither evidence nor explanation. When integrated with Digital ID systems, AI becomes the invisible arbiter of social participation, rendering judgments in milliseconds that human bureaucrats could never process.

The marriage of Digital ID and AI creates automated social sorting at scale. Your digital identity feeds data to algorithms that assess your creditworthiness, employability, insurability, trustworthiness as a tenant or traveler. These assessments occur constantly, invisibly, without your knowledge or consent. You do not apply for exclusion; it finds you through accumulated flagged behaviors and statistical anomalies.

Historical patterns of discrimination, embedded in decades of banking and criminal justice records, become encoded as algorithmic neutrality. The AI does not hate; it recognizes patterns. If certain zip codes correlate with loan defaults, the algorithm avoids those zip codes. If certain political affiliations correlate with chargebacks, the algorithm flags those affiliations. The result is discrimination without discriminatory intent, exclusion without explicit policy.

The speed of AI decision-making outpaces human comprehension and recourse. By the time you discover that your Digital ID has been flagged, that your access has been restricted, that your transactions have been blocked, the algorithm has already assessed thousands of other subjects. Appeals processes, where they exist, require you to prove your innocence to systems that presume algorithmic infallibility. The burden of proof inverts: you must demonstrate why you should not be excluded.

Predictive algorithms introduce temporal tyranny—the punishment of future crimes that have not occurred. If your purchasing patterns resemble those of previous criminals, if your social network includes flagged individuals, if your travel patterns suggest suspicious intent, the system can restrict your access preemptively. You are punished not for what you have done but for what you might do, according to statistical models you cannot examine.

Social Credit Arrives Without the Name

The Chinese social credit system, once viewed with Western condescension as authoritarian overreach, now serves as the template for behavioral modification through infrastructure. Its principles—rewarding compliance, punishing dissent, gamifying obedience—translate seamlessly into democratic contexts when wrapped in the language of convenience, security, and public health.

Digital ID enables the construction of citizen scores that amalgamate financial responsibility, social conformity, political reliability, and lifestyle compliance. These scores determine not merely access to loans but access to transportation, housing, education, and healthcare. They create a caste system more rigid than hereditary hierarchy because it claims the legitimacy of data and the neutrality of algorithmic assessment.

The architecture of obedience relies on visibility. When citizens know they are watched, they watch themselves. When they know their transactions are analyzed, they self-censor their purchases. When they know their movements are tracked, they restrict their associations. This internalized surveillance proves more efficient than external enforcement because it operates continuously, automatically, without cost.

Social credit systems also weaponize social relationships. Your score affects those with whom you associate; their scores affect yours. This creates powerful incentives for exclusionary behavior, for cutting ties with controversial figures, for policing the behavior of friends and family. The system externalizes its enforcement costs onto the population itself, transforming citizens into informants of their own subjugation.

The normalization of public shaming through digital platforms has prepared the ground for social credit implementation. We have already accepted that individuals can be deplatformed, debanked, and demonetized based on public opinion or algorithmic assessment. We have grown accustomed to the destruction of livelihoods through viral campaigns and corporate compliance. Social credit merely formalizes these practices and renders them systematic.

The End of Work Means the Beginning of Dependency

Artificial intelligence and automation threaten not merely employment but the concept of productive citizenship itself. As algorithms replace white-collar analysis and robotics replace blue-collar labor, the relationship between effort and survival severs. The proposed solution—Universal Basic Income—represents not generosity but the final consolidation of control through dependency.

UBI transforms citizens from producers into recipients, from contributors into supplicants. The income is unconditional only in rhetoric; in practice, it flows through the same Digital ID infrastructure that monitors all other aspects of existence. Acceptance of payment constitutes acceptance of the system, the infrastructure, the terms. Those who refuse Digital ID find themselves without income not through punishment but through exclusion from the distribution mechanism.

The amount provided always hovers at subsistence level, sufficient to prevent destitution but insufficient to accumulate independence. Recipients remain perpetually precarious, aware that non-compliance risks withdrawal. This creates a population easier to manage than any previous arrangement because it lacks both the resources for resistance and the productive independence that might sustain alternative communities.

The elimination of work destroys more than income; it destroys meaning, community, and the social fabric that binds individuals through mutual dependency. The barber, the mechanic, the local shopkeeper—these figures provided not merely services but social connection, neighborhood knowledge, informal support. Their replacement by automated systems and centralized distribution eliminates these nodes of community, leaving isolated recipients connected only to administrative apparatus.

The transition to UBI also facilitates the elimination of cash. When all income arrives digitally and all expenditure occurs through monitored channels, the informal economy vanishes. No under-the-table work supplements the official payment. No cash transactions escape the net. Complete visibility of economic life enables complete control, with restrictions applied seamlessly to those who deviate from prescribed behaviors.

When Food Becomes a Leverage Point

Agricultural land disappears beneath solar arrays while data centers consume energy equivalent to small nations. Farmland is purchased by institutional investors and converted to conservation easements that prohibit cultivation. Supply chain disruptions create the perception of permanent shortage. These developments converge toward a specific objective: the control of food as a mechanism of population management.

Digital ID enables rationing with precision impossible under previous systems. Your dietary allowances can be calibrated to your health data, your carbon footprint, your social score. Certain foods become available only to certain categories of citizens. Meat consumption is restricted based on environmental impact calculations. The carbon content of every meal becomes part of your permanent record.

The promotion of alternative proteins—insect-based foods, lab-grown meats, synthetic substitutes—proceeds not merely through marketing but through the elimination of alternatives. When traditional agriculture becomes economically unviable through regulation, when distribution networks prioritize approved products, when Digital ID systems restrict purchases of high-impact foods, the population transitions to substitutes not by choice but by necessity.

Food control represents the ultimate leverage because hunger admits no ideology. The individual who might resist surveillance for principle will compromise when children require nutrition. The system recognizes this asymmetry and exploits it ruthlessly. Compliance with Digital ID, with carbon tracking, with behavioral requirements becomes the condition for access to sustenance itself.

The rhetoric of sustainability masks the reality of control. Environmental concerns are genuine, but their exploitation for authoritarian ends does not address ecological crisis; it merely weaponizes it. The same systems that claim to reduce carbon footprints through dietary control maintain the industrial infrastructure of surveillance, the energy consumption of data centers, the elite consumption patterns of the managerial class. Restrictions apply downward, never upward.

Why This Cannot Be Undone

Physical infrastructure can be dismantled. Laws can be repealed. But digital systems, once established, develop path dependencies that make their removal nearly impossible. The databases exist. The algorithms are trained. The population has adapted. Reversion to previous arrangements becomes unthinkable not because it is technically impossible but because the social and technical infrastructure for alternatives has been destroyed.

Cash elimination illustrates this irreversibility. Once physical currency ceases circulation, the knowledge of its use atrophies. Young people raised on digital transactions cannot conceptualize economic life outside monitored channels. The physical infrastructure of cash—printing presses, distribution networks, retail cash handling—deteriorates or repurposes. Reintroduction becomes a massive undertaking that few politicians will attempt.

Similarly, the skills of anonymous living—navigating without GPS, communicating without digital trails, transacting without records—atrophy through disuse. Each generation becomes less capable of independence from digital systems than the last. By 2028, the cohort that remembers genuine privacy will have aged, diminished, lost influence. Digital natives will accept their condition as natural, as the only reality they have known.

Institutional capture ensures that no electoral victory suffices to reverse these trends. The bureaucracies implementing Digital ID transcend political cycles. Corporate partners maintain influence across administrations. International agreements commit nations to implementation regardless of domestic political shifts. Even sincere opposition confronts machinery too vast, too entrenched, too essential to daily functioning to dismantle within constitutional timeframes.

Why People Will Accept This

Populations do not resist comprehensive control because it arrives not as catastrophe but as convenience. Each step toward Digital ID is rationalized, justified, made appealing. The public accepts surveillance because it is packaged as security. They surrender privacy because privacy is framed as suspicious. They embrace dependency because dependency is marketed as freedom from want.

The human capacity for adaptation proves fatal to liberty. We normalize what should horrify. The frog boils not because it lacks the sense to leap but because the temperature rises gradually, each degree feeling like the previous. By the time the water scalds, the capacity for escape has atrophied. We tell ourselves that we will resist when the line is crossed, failing to recognize that the line moves continuously, that we have already crossed dozens of lines our ancestors would have defended.

The mythology of resistance sustains complacency. We imagine that when tyranny becomes obvious, we will act. We will opt out. We will go off-grid. We will resist. But the infrastructure for resistance requires preparation that few undertake. The skills, the networks, the alternative systems—these require years of cultivation that digital convenience discourages. When realization arrives, the capacity for effective resistance has already been dismantled.

Digital ID exploits the human desire for belonging. Exclusion from the system is not merely inconvenient; it is social death. The individual without Digital ID cannot participate in the economy, cannot travel, cannot access healthcare, cannot maintain normal social relationships. The cost of resistance is total, immediate, and visible, while the cost of compliance is gradual, deferred, and abstract. This asymmetry ensures that most will comply, that resistance will remain the province of those with unusual resources or unusual conviction.

The normalization of surveillance has already occurred. We carry tracking devices voluntarily. We share our locations, our preferences, our relationships with platforms that monetize this data. We accept facial recognition at airports, fingerprint scanning for phones, voice analysis for assistants. Each acceptance trains us for the next, larger surrender. Digital ID merely consolidates these separate acquiescences into unified control.

The 2028 Horizon

International organizations have established 2028 as the target for universal digital identity implementation. The World Bank, the UN, the WEF—all coordinate toward this deadline. National governments align their policies accordingly. The infrastructure is built, the legislation drafted, the populations prepared through incremental conditioning.

This timeline allows sufficient years for normalization, for the retirement of resistant populations, for the maturation of technical infrastructure, for the resolution of competing systems into unified standards. It represents the culmination of decades of preparation, the final phase of a transformation that began with credit cards and accelerated through smartphones.

The window for effective opposition narrows daily. Each new pilot program, each new banking regulation, each new digital service that requires verified identity—these build the scaffolding of the control system. Opposition becomes more difficult as the system becomes more comprehensive. The individual who refuses participation finds not a community of resistance but isolation, as the digital majority cannot comprehend or accommodate analog existence.

By 2028, the question will be settled not through debate but through fait accompli. The infrastructure will exist. The population will be enrolled. The exceptions will be marginalized, impoverished, forgotten. The warnings issued today will be dismissed as paranoid speculation, even as the reality they described becomes the water in which everyone swims, invisible because ubiquitous.

The Last Years of Analog Existence

We stand at the terminus of an era. The decades ahead will be defined by the struggle between digital totalitarianism and the remnants of human autonomy. The outcome is not predetermined; the machinery of control, however advanced, requires human compliance to function. But the trajectory favors the controllers because they act with coordination, resources, and long-term planning while the population sleeps, distracted by spectacle and comfort.

The 2028 deadline is not merely a policy target. It is the closing of a door. After it, the world of cash transactions, anonymous movement, unmonitored communication, and unverified identity becomes inaccessible not through law but through infrastructure. The past becomes literally unreachable because the means of reaching it have been dismantled.

Those who recognize this moment have limited options. They can prepare alternative systems, cultivate analog skills, build communities of mutual support outside digital channels. They can resist enrollment as long as possible, accepting the costs of exclusion. They can document these developments, preserving knowledge of what freedom meant for future generations who will have known only conditional access.

But they cannot stop the tide alone. Effective resistance requires collective recognition that has not materialized and shows little sign of materializing. The seductions of digital convenience prove too powerful, the costs of non-compliance too severe, the capacity for denial too robust.

What remains is witness. The documentation of this transformation, this closing of the frontier of liberty, this assembly of comprehensive control. We write now so that future readers will know that warnings were issued, that alternatives existed, that submission was chosen rather than inevitable. We write so that the record will show that some saw clearly, that some refused the anesthesia of convenience, that some maintained their humanity when the system demanded its surrender.

The years between now and 2028 will determine whether humanity retains the capacity for unmonitored existence or surrenders finally to the administered life. The clock ticks. The door slowly closes. And most stand watching, wondering why they feel a draft, not yet understanding that the walls are moving inward, that the space for liberty contracts with each passing day, that the world they knew is being dismantled around them, replaced by something colder, more efficient, more total, and more permanent than anything previous generations could have imagined or feared.

The warning has been given. The deadline approaches. The choice, for now, remains yours. But the window narrows. And the machinery does not sleep.

Source: https://madgewaggy.blogspot.com/

Image: Source [Edited]

Original Article: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/09/no_author/he-2028-digital-id-deadline-approaches/

The Fourth Amendment Does Not Have An Exception Saying Government May Watch Everyone If A Private Corporation Owns The Cameras

LewRockwell.com | Martin Armstrong

Welcome to America, where apparently standing around is now enough to have your movements searched through a nationwide surveillance network.

Records obtained from the Plano, Illinois Police Department reveal more than 1,200 searches involving the category “Curfew/Loitering/Vagrancy Violations.” That is from cameras controlled by ONE small police department, with law enforcement agencies elsewhere accessing those cameras as part of their searches. Additional audit records collected around the country show hundreds more searches under the same category. Flock has more than 120,000 cameras spread across 49 states, and its network has expanded into thousands of communities. This is no longer some camera sitting outside a convenience store recording a robbery. They have constructed the infrastructure to reconstruct where ordinary people travel, and police departments across jurisdictions can search that information.

This is precisely what I wrote about when I said, “Your Car Was Never the Target.” License plate readers were sold as a tool to find stolen vehicles and dangerous fugitives. Then the systems began recording the make, model, color, location, and movements of vehicles. Now Flock is developing AI systems capable of doing considerably more. Its newer investigative technology can combine camera information with police records, dispatch logs, and commercial identity databases, while other tools can search camera networks using written descriptions. Once you combine AI with a nationwide camera network, you are no longer investigating a crime after it occurs. You are constructing the machinery necessary to search the movements and associations of an entire population.

Flock’s newer AI tools can allow police to continuously search cameras in a defined area for someone matching a written description. A Texas deputy previously searched tens of thousands of cameras looking for a woman who had obtained an abortion. Officers have been accused of using Flock to track former romantic partners. Illinois discovered that federal immigration agents had gained access to state camera information despite restrictions. Now we learn the system is being searched for loitering and vagrancy. Yet they continue telling us not to worry because safeguards are coming. Flock has announced shorter default retention periods, case codes, auditing, and other controls. Fine. None of that changes the fundamental question: Why should government possess the ability to reconstruct the movements of millions of innocent people in the first place?

The Fourth Amendment was not written with an exception saying government may watch everyone so long as a private corporation owns the cameras. I wrote earlier this year about the FBI admitting that it purchases commercially available location information on Americans. This is the loophole they have discovered. Government does not always need to build the surveillance system itself anymore. Private corporations collect the information, construct the databases, and develop the technology. Government simply purchases access or contracts for the service. The private sector builds the cage and government gets the key.

People keep saying, “I have nothing to hide.” That is perhaps the most dangerous response imaginable. Liberty was never based upon proving to government that you have nothing to hide. Government was supposed to prove that it had probable cause to investigate YOU. We have turned that principle upside down. Everyone is monitored first, the information is stored, and government searches the database later when it decides somebody has become interesting. You do not need to commit murder. You do not need to rob a bank. You apparently do not even need to steal a car. You can be searched because somebody decided you were loitering.

We are all criminals now. That is where this mentality inevitably leads. Every citizen becomes a potential suspect because every citizen generates data that can be searched. Your car identifies where you travel, your phone identifies where you sleep, your credit card identifies what you buy, your bank identifies who you pay. Facial recognition identifies where you appear in real time. AI can connect information that once required hundreds of investigators and months of work in seconds. Governments of the past could only dream of possessing this kind of power.

This is how a surveillance state is created. There is no announcement from Washington declaring that privacy has ended. There is no single law abolishing the Fourth Amendment. It happens camera by camera, database by database, emergency by emergency, until one day people realize that anonymity in public has effectively disappeared. The government will insist that only criminals need to worry right up until the definition of “criminal” includes standing somewhere too long. [Or someone who refuses a deadly 'vaccine', or to wear a mask during a fake pandemic, or speaks against war, the government or their narratives...]

Source: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/government-surveillance/flock-cameras-watching-you/

Original Article: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2026/09/martin-armstrong/flock-cameras-watching-you/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Problem ~ Reaction ~ Solution, again.

In this looming world of “regulated” AI, governments could be empowered to shut down access to sites, networks or even the internet as a whole in the event of alleged “rogue AIs” becoming a “threat to national security”.

... the hype around the AI mass death threat is similar to other fear-based psy-ops like climate change and COVID. "Solutions" that have been offered include more regulation, an AI non-proliferation treaty, AI 'kill switches', face scans, restricted internet, and more.  ~ https://needtoknow.news/2026/09/anthropic-researcher-resigns-over-out-of-control-ai-fears-but-is-human-extinction-by-ai-another-psy-op/

Etienne de la Boetie | substack.com/@artofliberty

This [the image above] is what 2031 looks like...unless we sign away some more of our rights.

Kit Knightly | Off-Guardian.org

I’ve been documenting the increasingly hysterical coverage of ‘rogue AI’ for the last six weeks, predicting a major psy-op or false flag.

Well, kids it looks like the psy-op part is here. So far no false flag…but with the greatest level of hysteria since the early days of Covid circulating, maybe they won’t need to DO anything.

Maybe insane claims about a phantom threat will be enough.

Oh yes, did you know Artificial Intelligence has a “10% chance of wiping out humanity before the end of the decade”?

That’s the headline on every single mainstream paper, the trending topic on every social media platform, the talking point on every news channel.

Yes, from the producers of long-running hit show “CLIMATE CHANGE WILL KILL US ALL!” and the international sensation “COVID WILL KILL US ALL!” comes the latest experience in fear everyone is talking about.

And this latest wave is already being used to push new “regulation”, which should alarm anyone.

It all started with a young man, apparently named Jacob Coxon, who is allegedly a former AI researcher for OpenAI and later Anthropic.

Yesterday he announced his resignation from the latter, citing ethical concerns about the danger of “unregulated” artificial intelligence.

And, as is usually the case when an obscure person resigns from his job for supposed ethical concerns, his resignation was the subject of an exclusive article in the Wall Street Journal,

Oh and a simultaneously published thread on Twitter/X – from what is allegedly Coxon’s own account that had – so far as can be seen – never been used before.

AMAZINGLY, within hours Coxon’s alarming claims had gone “viral”.

Now some old cynics out there will be thinking at this stage “hmmm correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t this look suspiciously like a narrative roll-out”?

But I’m sure the terminally gullible will hasten to reassure you that this is the way real life definitely works.

It’s just a coincidence that everyone across the entirety of the political punditry spectrum is engaged in amplifying one single message.

In another of those startling synchronicities which we don’t need to think about too much, at exactly the same time that Coxon was hitting the mainstream headlines, Joe Rogan – king of the mainstream alternative media – had another AI researcher on his show, spouting his own dire warnings.

AI experts have been crawling out of the woodwork, all keen to endorse Coxon’s position – or even call it an underestimate.

You must have seen Geoffrey “the godfather of AI” Hinton on the BBC, telling Victoria Derbyshire he agreed with Coxon’s risk assessment:

A 10% chance of killing every single person on Earth in the next three and a half years.

No, really.

They’re less clear how exactly that’s going to happen – but that’s not the important part. The important part is we need to DO something.

Everyone from Matt Walsh to Glenn Greenwald agrees on that.

And what do we need to DO?

Why, REGULATE of course. That’s what Coxon said in one of his MANY media interviews in the last twenty-four hours (and as someone who has been aware of Coxon’s existence since some time yesterday I can tell you I trust him absolutely):

He floats an AI non-proliferation treaty “like we have for nuclear weapons” – as if it’s a wildly coincidental brand new idea, and not a paraphrase of the same talking point dozens of people – including Bill Gates – have been suggesting for months.

But what would a global AI treaty actually look like? And what would it achieve? And who will be in control of implementing it?

Well, for a potential taste here’s what US Congressman Bill Foster tweeted earlier today:

A “hardened” internet? Is that what we can expect?

No more “untraceable access” to AI facilities? Restrictions on “anonymous payments”? What exactly does that mean?

Perhaps “proof of humanity” or “proof of personhood” should be required to use the internet? Or maybe the internet should have “borders”?

Then there’s the kill switches of course, both the US and UK are close to implementing those:

Last week, coincidentally, a group of Lords from the UK’s upper house was calling for “kill switches”, not just for AI programs, but for data centres in general [emphasis added]:

A group of peers is calling for the British government to be able to deactivate powerful AI systems and switch off the country’s data centres in the event of the tech posing a threat to national security

And who will have control of these kill switches and other control mechanisms? You? Or the usual suspects?

Of course if you’ve already allowed yourself to be manipulated into believing data centers are the Spawn of Satan, you’ll probably think a kill switch is a great idea – and happily overlook that it’s just putting yet more control into the hands of institutions that already brought you the ‘covid’ scam and 9/11.

If any such people are reading this – does it occur to you yet that THIS was always the end point of those panic memes you hoovered up so uncritically?

Be careful what you wish for.

In this looming world of “regulated” AI, governments could be empowered to shut down access to sites, networks or even the internet as a whole in the event of alleged “rogue AIs” becoming a “threat to national security”.

And if YOU or your output or you interactions get labelled as potential AI, or you have your access restricted purely based on your location or IP address?

Well, good luck telling anyone as you scream inside your soundproof bubble.

This can go further – and we’d be fools to just assume it won’t.

In the name of preventing the spread of “rogue AI” (or “rouge AI” according to half the hysterics on social media), the internet can have information bulkheads which can be used to quarantine sections, nations, networks or individual sites “infected” with digital these digital “invasive species”.

You may have to prove your humanity with face scans or similar, and there may be strict limitations on what regions and/or databases you can reach, how much of your money you can spend without additional checks, etc.

Even the restricted internet of today might look like freedom compared to the’ post-AI-Regulation’ revised world wide web.

And today’s security state might be something to look back on with nostalgia when the ‘post-AI-Regulation’ revised worldwide surveillance and supply line controls kick in.

But don’t think about any of that – that nice guy Jacob you never heard of a week ago is warning you.

Listen to him on the mainstream media platform they gave him.

Demand your government saves you.

I’m sure this time it really will.

Source: https://off-guardian.org/2026/09/10/human-extinction-by-2030-remember-that-major-ai-psy-op-we-talked-about/

Original Article: https://dailynewsfromaolf.substack.com/p/human-extinction-by-2030remember

Related:

Telegram | Critical Free Thinkers

Ingredients and contaminants found within Apeel have now been linked to the most deadly brain disorders and cancers.

This includes toxic solvents and heavy metals such as:

• Lead
• Arsenic
• Cadmium
• Mercury

Apeel is a synthetic coating, funded by Bill Gates, which is sprayed onto fruits and vegetables to preserve them for longer.

You may be unknowingly consuming it since it was approved for organic produce and does NOT require mandatory labelling.

And you can't wash it off.

If you ask Apeel Sciences what the coating is made of they claim it is made from grapeseed.  Sounds
innocent but what they are not openly stating are the three petrochemical solvents which are highly toxic.  Toluene, one of the solvents, is found in gasoline. There are also 5 heavy metals in the spray coating:  palladium, arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury.  So when consuming produce coated with Apeel, we are potentially exposing ourselves to highly-processed fats, which contain trans fats and toxic heavy metals. ~ Richard S Montieth https://georgetownmarket.com/beware-of-apeel/

According to Apeel's own FDA documents, the manufacturing process which creates Apeel from grape seed oil involves toxic heavy metals like cadmium, mercury, and lead, and also involves toxic solvents like ethyl acetate and heptane. These minuscule amounts of toxins build up in the human body over time and can contribute to countless health conditions. ~ https://www.change.org/p/boycott-apeel-coated-produce-worldwide-until-further-testing-is-done

Original Article: https://t.me/c/1512670613/37037

Related:

Leaked Data Show Israel Covered Up Hundreds of Covid Shot Deaths and Hospitalizations Within Weeks of Vaccine Rollout

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH | FOCAL POINTS | Courageous Discourse

A newly published peer-reviewed study has exposed an internal Israeli Ministry of Health pharmacovigilance dataset documenting 531 hospitalizations and 67 deaths within weeks of mass COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout.

Nearly half of all hospitalization reports involved myocarditis or pericarditis. Among people under 30, that figure surged to 151 of 211 (71.6%), including 48 patients under 18.

But the most important revelation was how early Israeli authorities had this information. By March 25, 2021, barely three months into the vaccine rollout, Israel had already reported to Pfizer 46 deaths, 157 hospitalizations, and 65 myocarditis/pericarditis cases. These were not retrospective estimates assembled years later; they came from an operational Ministry of Health pharmacovigilance dataset used to document serious events considered relevant enough to report directly to the manufacturer. The median reported interval from vaccination to death was just 3 days.

The Public Was Told a Different Story

Israel had already alerted the CDC and European Medicines Agency to approximately 40 myocarditis cases by the end of February 2021. By March 25, the internal records contained the 46 deaths, 157 hospitalizations, and 65 myocarditis/pericarditis reports described above. Yet the study reconstructs a delay of roughly three to four months before the myocarditis signal was meaningfully communicated to clinicians and the public.

When the risk was finally acknowledged, the public messaging emphasized that myocarditis was “rare,” “mild,” and transient and that vaccination benefits outweighed the risks. That characterization was fraudulent given their internal record containing hundreds of serious hospitalizations, severe cardiac injury, and deaths.

The U.S. Was Covering-Up Major Safety Signals at the Same Time

The Israeli records are even more significant when viewed alongside what a 2026 U.S. Senate investigation uncovered inside the FDA.

FDA senior medical officer Dr. Ana Szarfman and statistician Dr. William DuMouchel applied an upgraded data-mining method to VAERS in early 2021 that identified 49 examples of extreme masking and roughly 25 statistically significant safety signals that the agency’s standard method had missed. Those signals included sudden cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary infarction, thrombosis/embolism, Bell’s palsy, dementia, and “death and sudden death.”

The Senate report says Szarfman was circulating these findings to senior FDA officials in March, April, May, and July 2021. Internal communications cited in the investigation show that officials told her to “hold off” on generating and distributing further reports, described the work as a “major distraction,” and expressed concern that conflicting safety findings could feed into “anti-vaccination rhetoric.” She was ultimately ordered to “cease and desist.”

So in essentially the same early-2021 window, Israeli authorities were documenting deaths, hospitalizations, and a major myocarditis signal while FDA analysts in the United States were independently uncovering serious cardiac, thrombotic, neurological, and mortality signals.

Two Countries, the Same Pattern

In Israel, the Ministry of Health documented deaths, severe cardiac events, and hundreds of hospitalizations and reported them to Pfizer, while the eventual public messaging falsely claimed that myocarditis was rare and mild.

In the United States, an FDA analyst uncovered previously obscured signals involving sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, thrombosis, and mortality—and senior officials then told her to cease and desist.

Taken together, this confirms that the most serious vaccine-safety information was known internally, tempered publicly, and withheld from the risk narrative presented to patients and physicians.

The cover-up of COVID-19 “vaccine” deaths, injuries, and disabilities appears to have been a coordinated GLOBAL OPERATION.

Original Article: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-leaked-data-show-israel

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

These pages contain videos that focus on the truth.

Antthropic, Open AI & Government are the prime beneficiaries

Ed Dowd | Beyond the Narrative | eddowdbeyondthenarrative.substack.com

Background

On Tuesday, September 8, the day after Labor Day weekend (love the timing!) a young man by the name of Jacob Coxon put out a post on X…his first post ever and it went mega viral. He is a former employee of both Anthropic and OpenAI and he warned about the dangers of AI. Within 24 hours Jacob‘s X post had received 123 million views 650,000 likes 190,000 followers. Even Elon weighed in and said “I don’t think this has ever happened for a post from a new account with almost no prior activity.“ Immediately mainstream media hopped on board to add to the virality of the post. The Wall Street Journal within a few hours had already interviewed Jacob and mainstream media piled on. Both sides of the house then piled on (mostly Democrats) with X post quotes calling immediately to ask for regulations and government interventions.

I created my Substack Ed Dowd: Beyond the Narrative to address issues such as this, and I believe this is a well-orchestrated psyop to move the needle and change minds.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “psyop.”

“A military operation usually aimed at influencing the enemy’s state of mind through noncombative means… also: someone or something used by the government to influence the population’s opinions and attitudes.”

I am not saying Jacob Coxon is a government asset. I am saying the last 72 hours look less like a whistleblower and more like an inorganic panic narrative.

Anomalies

The X account @hilbertspaess had almost no footprint before Tuesday night. The bio is two words: “ai research.” The account sat there for a year. Then, in one coordinated burst, a seven-post thread announcing a resignation from Anthropic, a warning that the labs are “gambling with our lives,” and a prediction that the people building this stuff privately believe it could kill everyone by the end of the decade. Overnight the post printed nine figures in views. Hundreds of thousands of likes. The account went from nobody to a household handle before most of the country had coffee.

That is not how organic X speech works: organic speech stumbles, it posts a draft, it deletes a typo and it has a history. This account had a history of silence, then a professionally punchy script, then the entire mainstream media stack that ran with it with hours of post.

The Wall Street Journal published an exclusive interview with Coxon very shortly after the post went live. Business Insider, Newsweek, the New York Post, Mashable, and Deadline, all ran the same quotes within hours. Then the next day live interviews on Fox News and CNN. That is not one reporter getting lucky on a late night scroll. That is a package. In my humble opinion you do not get a WSJ exclusive and a 100 million view thread by accident unless the interview was already in the can.

Then I did what I always do. I read the replies and skeptics on X. The anomaly hunters got there first. Parker Thayer laid out the timeline that made my former equity portfolio manager brain activate: the Journal piece “potentially” landing before the public post, an account with no prior engagement suddenly exploding, and the first quote posts arriving inside fifteen minutes from policy shops whose funding traces back to the same circle of Anthropic-adjacent philanthropy. Other users pointed at the empty follower graph, the sudden verification, the fact that the first amplifiers were not random citizens but people whose job is to turn fear into statutes and accusations of links to AI policy NGOs.

You can argue with any one of those dots. It is harder to argue with the cluster.

The big tell for me was what certain members of Congress do when a narrative is pre-cooked. Representative Ro Khanna very quickly quoted the thread and demanded a federal AI agency “like we have for nuclear power and airplanes,” pre-certification, kill switches, criminal penalties, and hearings with “researchers like Jacob.” He told Speaker Johnson to keep the House in session. On the other side of the Hill, Senator Bernie Sanders already had a superintelligence ban circulating with Representative Greg Casar creating a cabinet level agency, an advisory board of “experts,” the whole cathedral. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Richard Blumenthal piled on. OpenAI, not to be left out of its own “funeral”, started posting about national safety rules.

Classic Hegelian Dialectic

Thesis>Antithesis>Synthesis…also known as Problem>Reaction>Solution.

Hegel would recognize the move:

· Thesis-the labs are racing toward systems they cannot control

· Antithesis-the public is now terrified, and the screenshots of Coxon’s thread are the proof

· Synthesis-regulation, a licensing regime, a new agency and barriers to entry dressed up as “containment”

Then ask the only question that ever matters: Who benefits?

Let us start with who does not benefit:

· Not the open-source shops

· Not the startups that cannot afford a compliance department and a containment audit

· Not the Chinese labs, who will ignore the sermon and keep training regardless

The first beneficiaries are the two names in the original post: Anthropic and OpenAI.

They are burning cash at a rate that would make a 2000-2001 CLEC blush. Token prices keep falling. Enterprise demand is not doubling fast enough to offset it. The second derivative is slowing. Capex is a black hole. Valuations only work if the story stays vertical and the competitive set stays small. A federal moat with pre-certification, insurance mandates, criminal liability for unlicensed models does two things at once. It crushes the long tail of competitors who were eating their margins. And it gives the incumbents a political story to take to investors: “we are the responsible adults, the regulated utilities of intelligence, please keep funding the losses until the unit economics appear.”

The second beneficiary is the government itself (this push is mostly a Democrat project.)

A cabinet-level AI agency means new appropriations, new buildings, new GS-15s, new contractors, new “advisory boards” stuffed with the same people who wrote the talking points. Hearings mean travel budgets and television time. Pre-certification means a permanent inspection class. Mandatory insurance means a regulated market the agencies get to supervise. Every one of those is a funding request that survives the news cycle.

A few Republicans have already volunteered to help build the machine. Senator Josh Hawley has been the loudest, telling his own party it must “regulate” AI so it does not displace the worker, and he already has a bill with Blumenthal, co-sponsored by Senator Marsha Blackburn, to make federal reviews of advanced models mandatory. Representative Jay Obernolte has been shopping the Great American AI Act with Democrats Lori Trahan and House Republicans Scott Franklin and Erin Houchin. After Coxon’s thread, even Senator Ted Cruz, who spent last year trying to preempt state AI rules, posted that the risks are “dangerous and frightening,” that “we need guardrails,” and that he is working with Amy Klobuchar and John Thune on catastrophic bio and nuclear AI risk. You do not need the whole GOP…you only need a handful of names so the new agency can call itself bipartisan when the appropriation comes up.

Fear is how you grow the state when you cannot grow the economy.

Bottom Line

I recently wrote a post, Wall Street’s AI Capex Party...It’s 2 AM & The Bar is About To Close, where I outlined it is becoming more expensive to fund the buildout and investors are questioning the ultimate return on investment. A safety panic that ends in a licensing cartel is the most elegant refinancing I have seen in a long time for both the labs and the bureaucracy that will charge rent on the panic. You do not have to prove the models will kill us. You only have to make Congress and the public feel that they might. Fear is cheaper than a profitable product, and it is cheaper than a balanced budget.

Could Coxon be sincere? Sure…people leave jobs and people get scared…sincerity and utility are not opposites. The most effective operations use a real person with real anxiety and then put a megaphone, a Journal reporter, and a legislative calendar underneath him.

I do not know exactly how accurate these AI fears might be but I do know what a coordinated narrative looks like:

· An unused account, a same night exclusive

· Policy NGOs first in line comment

· Bills already written

· Multiple members of congress immediately posting on X their hot takes

· Two companies with a cash-burn problem recast as the only adults in the room

· Government, mostly Democrats, with just enough Republicans for cover, that suddenly needs another agency, another appropriation, and another reason to sit between you and the future.

· Two cash burning frontier AI companies that need to regulate their competition out of existence

Watch the cash, watch the narrative, watch the fear porn, watch who benefits…this is elaborate Kabuki Theater. After the Covid psyop this is the next big push in my opinion. All the signs are present.

“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.” Proverbs 18:17

Original Article: https://eddowdbeyondthenarrative.substack.com/p/the-post-labor-day-ai-panic-psyop?r=12542m&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Trump Offers to Send $5,000 to Every Citizen If Republicans Retain Control of Congress

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse™) | John Leake | thefocalpoints.com

When George Washington first ran for the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1755, his campaign advisors recommended that he host parties at taverns near polling places and provide free booze to anyone who seemed inclined to support him. Washington refused to participate in what was essentially bribing voters with alcohol, and he lost the election. However, three years later, he decided to play the game and allowed his agent to provide roughly 160 gallons of alcoholic drinks for 391 voters—amounting to nearly half a gallon per person. This time he easily won the election. 

I thought of this incident when I saw the news this morning that—during a speech Wednesday night at the GOP’s midterm convention here in my native Dallas, Texas— President Trump proposed sending every adult American citizen a $5,000 “Trump dividend” if Republicans retain control of both chambers of Congress in November. As he put it: 

If the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000. It will be called the Trump dividend. Now all we have to do is win. Your vote will decide whether our country stumbles at the starting gate of our next 250 years or surges forward and never looks back.

Note that a $5,000 payout to 270 million adults would cost the US government approximately $1.35 trillion. Trump floated his proposal shortly after US public debt surpassed $40 trillion for the first time.

Uncle Sam’s infinite largesse has been enabled because Congress no longer even pretends to place limits of federal indebtedness. Since 2013, it has suspended the debt ceiling eight times, allowing for continued borrowing without a specific dollar limit for set periods. 

With Trump’s announcement, the US government has officially entered what I call the “drunken sailor in port” phase of our Constitutional Republic. Dying of some tropical disease in a Caribbean port and knowing that a British Navy press gang will soon force him into service on a warship, the sailor spends all of his money on rum and hookers and consoles himself that he’s had a good run. 

Original Article: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/trump-offers-to-send-5000-to-every

Real Canadian Patriots | Telegram

NotTheBee.com | Dr Jones

In October 2024, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) dismantled the largest and most sophisticated illicit drug superlab in Canadian history in Falkland, British Columbia. Federal investigators seized 54 kilograms of fentanyl, 390 kilograms of methamphetamine, 35 kilograms of cocaine, 15 kilograms of MDMA, and 89 firearms, alongside massive amounts of precursor chemicals and $500,000 in cash.

The RCMP estimated that the seized materials could have produced over 95 million potentially lethal doses of fentanyl.

As of September 2026, nearly two years after the raid, no one has been charged with producing or manufacturing fentanyl at the Falkland superlab. The sole suspect named in connection with the investigation, Gaganpreet Singh Randhawa, pleaded guilty in early 2026 to attempting to export 310 kilograms of methamphetamine to the Philippines and various drug and firearms possession charges, but his plea did not include charges related to the fentanyl production at the Falkland site.

From the Western Standard:

Nearly two years after the RCMP announced it had dismantled the largest fentanyl and methamphetamine lab in Canadian history, no one has been charged with producing, manufacturing, or distributing fentanyl from there, and it remains unclear if anyone ever will.

That's … refreshingly honest. As a recap, here's some background on the case:

On October 31, 2024, the RCMP put on — by its standards — a fairly grandiose press conference at divisional headquarters in Surrey announcing it had taken down what Assistant Commissioner David Teboul called the 'largest and most sophisticated illicit fentanyl and meth facility ever found in Canada.'

Ok, sounds like things got off to a strong start.

So, where did things go sideways?

Here's a more blunt breakdown of the situation:

The U.S. handed the entire case to the Canucks on a silver platter, implicating Mexican cartel elements and Chinese heavy hitters, and they didn't make a SINGLE arrest?

Source: https://notthebee.com/article/canada-fails-to-arrest-anyone-after-fbi-hands-them-details-of-fentanyl-superlab-run-by-chinese

Original Article: https://t.me/therealcanadianpatriots/167286

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

Related:

These pages contain videos that focus on the truth.

No Planes Hit Any Tower Or Building On 9/11 2001

This footage shows an non edited timeline showing the second explosion without a plane.

Another video from a different angle:

No plane a the Pentagon either. It was a missile.

Here is building 7 falling by controlled demolition. No plane or fire. Clearly detonations.

Related:

Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

This is the day when I realized the truth needed to be told by independent journalists because the mainstream media was completely full of shit. This is when my career changed from stock broker to independent journalist. I hung up the phone on clients calling me to try to profit from this event before the second building fell, and I started to research and write.

This day I saw first hand the lies of the government playing out in real time. From the live video feed of Bush at being told a "second plane" hit the twin towers in New York, while innocently reading a book to school children; the look on his face was that "It was done", not one of surprise.

This day showed for those with eyes to see, the "plane" truth that government lies. This day changed the course of history, not only for me, but for the world.

The official story was so blatantly a lie, completely full of holes and scientific impossibilities that it warped the minds of the masses - just like the covid scam (renaming the flu) did.

Buildings don't pancake collapse at free fall speed.

Bad CGI was the only evidence of any plane hitting any building.

Raw uncut footage shows the building explosions with no planes present.

News crews were announcing buildings fell that had not fallen yet.

One on the spot reporter stated there was no visible plane debris at the pentagon.

The explosive nature of the buildings collapse was clearly a controlled demolition. Also cut columns are not caused by planes, they are caused by shape charges used in controlled demolitions.

The ridiculous official narrative that still stands today is a shining example of the satanic inversion theory; that using gaslighting and propaganda, lies can remain the official word, no matter how obvious.

What Did Happen On That Day?

For those who were not watching live, or for those who have not done research; 4 false flag attacks took place, planned by our own government, executed by our own government, and covered up by our own government.

This was done to further enable the war machine and totalitarian control of the masses.

A missile hit the pentagon, and 3 buildings were brought down by pre planned, controlled demolition that took weeks to physically set up. CGI was used to blame planes hitting the towers, but no planes were used at all on any building in reality.

See for yourself:

This footage shows an non edited timeline showing the second explosion without a plane.

Another video from a different angle:

No plane a the Pentagon either. It was a missile.

Here is building 7 falling by controlled demolition. No plane or fire. Clearly detonations.

For those who know the truth, this anniversary day each year serves as a reminder that the official lie still stands because the masses choose to live in denial and the traitor perpetrators who carried out these false flag events have not been brought to justice; pathetic.

For those just learning the truth, the events on this day show government complicity in a self inflicted deadly false flag attack on its own people, and should spark you to question all government actions and narratives.

For both, the status of the narrative lie, is and will continue to be, a barometer showing the current state of the nation.

Here are some of the 9/11 articles we have published on Truth11.com:

Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

After being censorship attacked during the covid scamdemic and shut down on WordPress with 13,046 articles published on that platform; Truth11.com had to be rebuilt. On our new platform we have now published 6,000 articles, this is the 6,000th article posted!. We are truth warriors and will continue to fight, write and report to bring you the truth.

We still endure to this day massive censorship and algorithmic blacklisting. With your help we can reach more people. You can help Truth11.com by helping us fight censorship. Please Share Truth11.com with others, share our articles, share our Images + Memes, videos, documents and solutions pages.

You can also help us in our independent media mission by becoming a monthly subscriber. This is of great importance to us, as we are not funded by the government (obviously), also we do not allow any advertising or paid posts - to keep us independent and free to report the truth. It also keeps our site easy to read, free from distractions and sales pitches. Your monthly subscription for $3 or $11 (your choice) is our only ability to cover costs and we greatly appreciate the support from all of our subscribers!

You can also help us in our mission to report the truth by making a small one time donation.

Thank you Truth Warriors for being a person who wants the truth, for reading, sharing and caring.

Make A Donation (USD)

Become A Monthly Subscriber

Subscribe + Support Our Work At Truth11.com

Choose Your Subscription Amount $3 or $11 (USD) Per Month

Related:

Truth11.com Archive

Access to the Way Back Machine Snapshot of Truth11.com On The Old Platform Before It Was Shut Down To Censor The Truth.

Search Truth11.com Archive

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“America’s state religion, is ‘patriotism,’ a phenomenon which has convinced many of the citizenry that ‘treason’ is morally worse than murder or rape.” ~ William Blum

One meaningless jingoistic cliché I am subjected to constantly is “I love my country.” This gibberish for the most part is pure nonsense, and is rarely defined. When most use this term, do they love the people, land, culture, or the government? My take from all my many thousands of encounters of this phrase, is that it means I love my country right or wrong, which is pure nationalism. I say this because that is what I see and hear with my own eyes and ears. This is why many raise blood-soaked flags in honor of aggressive war. This is why most will stand hatless with their hand over their heart during the ‘national’ anthem, this is why most will pledge their dying allegiance to the State, and this is why most all perpetually worship the military and those who falsely claim to ‘serve’ the people.

They rarely if ever say I love all the people, because they do not. They rarely if ever say I love the landscape, and they rarely if ever say I love the culture. This cliché is used almost entirely under the assumption that one is showing false ‘patriotism’ to the national state, which indicates agreement with what those controlling the nation-state do in their name. This includes taxation, theft, economic destruction, inflation, regulation, mass brutal enforcement, and aggressive warmongering. In other words, as mentioned earlier, they love the State, right or wrong. This attitude is pure reverent worship of the nation and government, which is the exact opposite of honest ‘patriotism.’ Hypocrisy has already taken over at this point.

This is the epitome of what is called ‘Stockholm Syndrome,’ where the ‘citizen’ (victim) forms a psychological attachment (bond) with his captor, controller, and master; in this case, the government. To see this attitude practiced in totality, one only has to watch or attend any large sporting event. As the field-sized flag is rolled out, military jets overhead, and government soldiers on the grounds, everyone is ordered to stand, remove his hat, put his hand over his heart, and bow down to the State en masse. 80,000 will all stand at once, (to not acquiesce and go along with the tamed collective herd can be risky as I have found out many times) complying with the order they have received, while acting as if in prayer to a ‘god.’ The ‘god’ they are praying to is the so-called ‘united’ states.

This is propaganda indoctrination; this what is taught you see, almost from birth to death, from cradle to grave and generationally, beginning in government run, mandatory attendance, ‘public’ schooling environments. This brainwashing is supported by the town and city politicians, the State, the federal government, and the complicit media. This instilled worship of rule is a huge part of the lives of all, and the reason this population is so easy to dumb down and control. As so aptly stated by Jean Baudrillard: “We are dealing with a genuine Stockholm syndrome on a mass scale – when the hostage becomes the accomplice of the hostage taker – as well as a revolution of the concept of voluntary servitude and master-slave relations. When the entire society becomes an accomplice to those who took it hostage, but just as much when individuals split into, for themselves, hostage and hostage taker.” In other words, most all of you are willing slaves, and the ‘country’ you claim to love, is your lord and master, and just as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

This is an appropriate time to bring up this subject, as blood-soaked flags are flying all around me, as those who “rally round the flag’ are showing their solidarity to their State ‘god’ on this ‘holiday’ weekend celebrating Labor Day. This is supposed to be a celebration of laborers, but in this country today, every made-up holiday is treated as — Worship the State and military warmongers day. Never miss a chance to idolize the State, but always remember that the Mafia is more honest than any government, so maybe your ‘patriotic’ idolatry is misplaced.

Now, this heinous empire called America is warring around the world, aggressively maiming and killing, all in your name and with your earnings, wealth, and the blood of your children. It is supporting genocide, and destroying your most necessary vital goods of food, water, and energy. Your savings are being depleted, and the worthless fiat currency is continually debased, as hundreds of trillions of dollars of debt continue to rise, while you await the coming collapse. The big club that you ain’t in does not care about you, does not give a damn about you, but it does want you either controlled or eliminated.

This country is coming apart at the seams, and this is happening intentionally, by design, and is conspiratorial. The agenda, the real big picture, is to form a technocratic governing system; a globalist system put into place in order to claim ownership of everything, and then implement regional universal ruling ‘authority’ zones to lord over all. To accomplish this requires a complete digitization, biometric labeling, non-cash society with digital currency, and concentration-camp environments where control becomes more manageable. The depopulation agenda is an important aspect of this plan as well, as has been telegraphed for decades, and obvious signs of this evil are already evident.

This is not just happening here, but worldwide, and simultaneously among most every country. This is a global phenomenon. This would be impossible unless controlled by a master class of criminal rulers and their pawns and partners in politics, media, and military, as has already happened during the absolute fraud of the fake ‘covid’ pandemic, where most every country on earth did the exact same things at once. You see, all this is a long-planned, structured undertaking that is now coming to fruition.

The result of this takeover plot is up to you, all of you as individuals, not as a collective horde bowing to the State as ‘god.’ Caring intimately for where you were born, your culture, and where you live is natural, but reverence for a governed nation-state reveals a much deeper insanity based on enslavement, not freedom. Americans are captured serfs at this point, dependent on a failed system of reprehensible and immoral rule.

America is now in the darkest moments of its existence, and this has happened because it was allowed to happen by the weakness and indifference of the American people, and without any legitimate resistance. Mass individual opposition is necessary if sanity and freedom are desired. Without an awakening to the fact that this country’s ruling class and government are consumed by evil and deserve no respect, without the understanding that false ‘patriotism’ is not the way forward, but the way to hell, then we all face eventual bondage, or worse, annihilation.

This ‘country’ (or any other) is not to be worshipped or idolized, it is to be lived in, enjoyed, and protected from all those who would claim rule over it. Governments, all governments, are always your captor, controller, and master, and never deserve to be associated with “love of country,” but treated with contempt. Stockholm Syndrome is complete mental instability, and ‘Statism’ is the epitome of the this mental disorder of man, where captivity is more sought than freedom.

“Nationalism is pimped out bigotry, designed to provoke a Stockholm syndrome in the livestock.” - Stefan Molyneux

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-near-entirety-of-americans-are-engulfed-by-a-nationalistic-stockholm-syndrome/

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.