Login
Techno-Fascism
...this is what “winning” and “20-D Chess” looks like: techno-fascism. And if you don’t agree and accept this voluntary enslavement in the name of “SI,” data centers, surveillance, tokenization and more, then you are the “enemy,”
The WinePress | substack.com/@thewinepress
President Donald Trump considers you an “enemy” if you don’t accept and use his new term for artificial intelligence, “Super Intelligence” (SI), following an executive order he signed along with a ‘treaty’ of sorts with a number of tech companies vowing industry protections.
On October 8th, Trump posted on Truth Social:
“The White House considers anyone that uses the term, “Artificial Intelligence,” as opposed to the highly accepted new and more accurate term, “Super Intelligence,” THE ENEMY! President DONALD J. TRUMP.”
Last month, Trump declared that AI would be renamed to SI instead, he announced on Truth Social and at the United Nations General Assembly. He said at the time “the use of the word artificial makes intelligence fake, it makes it sound fake. And it is not fake.”
Not long after that, Trump, via executive order, declared that SI is the new official term in the United States — “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence.”
EO #14434 states:
“The extraordinary technologies being pioneered by American innovators far exceed what was envisioned when the term “Artificial Intelligence” first came into use. The capabilities of today’s frontier systems do much more than imitate or automate discrete aspects of human intelligence. They increasingly amplify human ingenuity and unlock new forms of creativity, empowering Americans to achieve what was previously impossible across science, medicine, and nearly every other domain of human endeavor.
“As these capabilities continue to improve, they increasingly represent not merely artificial intelligence, but a new era of Super Intelligence.
“The terminology used by the Federal Government should reflect the transformative capabilities of these technologies and the limitless opportunities they create for the American people.
“Accordingly, the term “Super Intelligence” more appropriately captures the promise, potential, and rapidly advancing capabilities of these technologies.
“It is therefore the policy of my Administration that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the executive branch shall use the terms “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” and will not acknowledge the usage of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in any applicable setting.”
“To the maximum extent permitted by law, executive departments and agencies (agencies) shall use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in place of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory documents within the executive branch.”
Moreover, the official White House fact sheet reiterates why the administration is adamant about codifying so-called “SI” as law.
“The name Super Intelligence conveys the true capabilities of the technologies being developed today, unlocking new forms of human creativity and empowering Americans to achieve what was previously impossible—not simply imitating or automating human intelligence as is implied by the term “Artificial Intelligence.””
On top of that, President Trump and the heads of some of the largest AI and tech companies in the U.S. signed an “accord” that sets self-imposed guardrails and controls to safely self-regulate “SI.”
The treaty of sorts was signed by Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and its parent company Alphabet; Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic; Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta; Greg Brockman, co-founder and President of OpenAI; Elon Musk, founder and CEO of XAI, along head of Tesla, SpaceX, X (Twitter), Neuralink, and The Boring Company; and lastly Jensen Huang, CEO and founder of Nvidia.
Though the agreement was curiously not published on the White House website, it still made the rounds on social media and official archival websites.
The agreement states:
In order to build a positive future for the American people and the world, we believe every company is responsible for developing its own technology safely and in a way that builds trust with customers and the public.
This starts with every company that is training and deploying frontier models having robust internal processes and controls to ensure that their technology behaves as intended and that any issues are promptly identified and resolved. Therefore, in addition to any other precautions, we believe each company should implement the following four layers of controls and audits:(1) Implement robust internal controls to monitor the capabilities and alignment of its models during training and deployment around areas like cybersecurity, biosecurity, and chemical threats, and to ensure that its models do not hack or access technical systems in unintended ways.
(2) Empower an internal team to ensure all of the controls, monitoring, and detection are operating as intended, and that any issues are remediated.
(3) Partner with an independent external auditor or evaluator to carry out independent assessments of whether the controls, monitoring, and detection are operating as intended.
(4) Designate an independent committee of the board of directors to oversee and receive reports from the teams operating the controls and the internal and external auditors and evaluators, as well as to ensure any issues identified are remediated.
Together, these steps will give each company, its customers, and the public confidence that the technology is operating as intended.
The participating companies will meet regularly to establish standards and best practices to improve the safety of their systems.
Over time, it may make sense to codify these steps into laws or regulations. Regardless of whether this is required of companies, we believe that implementing these controls and audits is critical to ensuring a safe future for everyone, and each of our companies are committed to doing this.
However, the accord went viral for the wrong reasons as many noticed that there was a typo at the end of the accord, “President of the Unites States” [sic].
After the pact was signed, Trump, administration officials and the heads of these tech firms addressed the media and explained why they did this.
Trump posted a picture of who was at the luncheon event after the pact was signed. Other notable figures in attendance were Alex Karp and Shyam Sankar, CEO and President of Palantir; Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon; David Sacks, the now-former White House AI and crypto czar and member of the infamous “PayPal Mafia;” and more.
Afterwards, Trump and some of the heads of these companies gave more remarks to the press.
Trump once again promoted the necessity of data centers, among other things, floating out the idea of these companies who want to build them should provide a dividend to communities.
“The people are going to benefit directly, whether its teachers that get paid a bonus, whether its people that live in the community that get paid a dividend you could call it a dividend because a dividend sounds right, they are going to greatly benefit by what’s happened.”
“Data centers are bringing in a tremendous amount of money into the community, and the people now are going to benefit directly.”
Most notable was Elon Musk’s, who, standing next to Trump, heavily insinuated that people would be replaced at their jobs with robots and AI, and people would be given monthly allotted tokens as ‘income’ instead.
The question was asked “about abundance of the future because people looking at this will be worried, particularly laptop jobs, what what are they going to do in the future?,” the reporter asked.
Musk replied:
“Well, I think it is worth highlighting the positive benefits of AI, or SI, pardon me.
“Super Intelligence. I think by far the most likely outcome is an age of abundance, where we don’t have just universal basic income, we have universal high income.
“And people speak about the medical benefits, but maybe it’s worth talking a bit more about that. When you have robots and you have superintelligence, it means that everyone in the world can have better medical care than anyone here, including me. And wouldn’t that be wonderful?”
The reporter quipped, “Not if they haven't got a job.”
Musk then replied:
“Well, jobs are going to change. Jobs have always changed.
But being a computer used to be a job. There used to be buildings full of people doing calculations. But now digital computers do those tasks. I don’t think anyone is pining to go back and do calculations all day to do bank interest rates, which is what they used to do. So I think we’ll see an evolution of roles.
“And as the President has mentioned, it’s not as though unemployment has increased. In fact, there’s a tremendous demand for people. So I think the most likely outcome, and it’s probably worth looking at the most likely outcome, is one which is incredibly beneficial, and it’s a future that you... If you could look into the future, it is a future you would want.”
This is not the first time Musk has promoted this new way of life.
For example, in December 2025, Musk, sitting alongside Jensen Huang, promoted what he calls “universal high income” — a play-on-words of so-called “universal basic income,” where people are remitted a monthly allotted amount of money to live on; premised on the the concept that AI will automate most production and the public then gets a slice of the pie.
But at a forum hosted in Saudi Arabia, Musk stated:
“In the long term, where will things end up? Long term, I don’t know what long term is. Maybe it’s 10, 20 years, something like that. For me, that’s long term.
“My prediction is that work will be optional. It’ll be like playing sports or a video game or something like that. If you want to work, [it’s] the same way you can go to the store and just buy some vegetables, or you can grow vegetables in your backyard. It’s much harder to grow vegetables in your backyard, and some people still do it because they like growing vegetables.
“That will be what work is like, optional. And between now and then, there’s actually a lot of work to get to that point. I always recommend people read Yen Bank’s culture books to get a sense for what a probable positive AI future is like.
“And interestingly, in those books, money is no longer, doesn’t exist. It’s kind of interesting. And my guess is, if you go out long enough, assuming there’s a continued improvement in AI and robotics, which seems likely, the money will stop being relevant at some point in the future.
“There will still be constraints on power, like electricity and mass. The fundamental physics elements will still be constraints. But I think at some point, currency becomes irrelevant.”
Musk has promoted this socialist idea for many years, well before he became an open ally of President Trump’s, despite online claims that Musk and other transhumanists and technocrats were supposed libertarians and conservatives.
Trump and Democrats have increasingly called for socialized benefits coming from AI as well. The Trump administration is reportedly in talks to take stake in OpenAI, as they have already with computing, rare earths, and defense contractors.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
Well, there you have it: this is what “winning” and “20-D Chess” looks like: techno-fascism. And if you don’t agree and accept this voluntary enslavement in the name of “SI,” data centers, surveillance, tokenization and more, then you are the “enemy,” our illustrious president says. No, HE is the enemy of truth and righteousness!
Acts 13:10 And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?
And you see that manifested as, if this unholy alliance isn’t bad enough, you have Musk up there, standing right next to Trump, telling you that you will own nothing and be happy, AI and robots are going to take your change, and will give you some monthly good-boy tokens credited to your digital smart wallet, as you walk around in an open-air prison being surveilled 24/7 everywhere you go.
This is not surprising that Musk would say this nor Trump passively going along with it. Trump, as I have pointed out several times previously, has said America will never become a socialist nation; which, in the Trump lexicon, means that we WILL become a socialist nation. We already were in many ways, but now definitely have become a techno-fascist and socialist economic zone.
And Musk — I have said for years that this guy is an absolute snake in the grass and tech bro, despite the mass-hypnosis by the mainstream and alternative media pundits convincing you he is another “white hat,” good guy billionaire who is going to help drain the swamp. I mean, how low must these people’s IQ scores be to fall for that tripe? But this stuff Musk is saying is stuff that he has been saying for years; and now El Trumpo signed-off on it. The Great Reset continues unmolested.
Trump, as I have documented, has already defended H-1Bs and expanding the visa program to replace Americans in the workforce and in universities, and has lauded robots replacing Americans in factories and will be counted as “job growth.”
This stupid treaty is more symbolic than anything else. Paper will put up with anything you put on it; and they couldn’t even avoid a typo right where Trump had to sign. That speaks volumes more than anything as to just how efficacious this pact is. It almost makes you wonder if that was done intentionally.
Why only those companies? Palantir and Amazon were represented at the luncheon but not in the pact. Oracle and others are nowhere to be found. So that just goes to show how feckless this pact is. Can’t impede the surveillance state!
Jeremiah 22:17 But thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppression, and for violence, to do it.
Original Article: https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/techno-fascism-trump-says-anyone
