Parts I: 1932, and II: 2026

Part I: Technocrats Called for Dictatorship and Technocracy In 1932

Patrick Wood | technocracy.news

In my tattered copy of Henry A. Porter’s Roosevelt and Technocracy (1932), an early reader drew a careful bracket around a single passage on page 72. It reads: “Radical and immediate changes in both our political and economic systems will be necessary.

This can best be accomplished by vesting supreme and emergency power in some one man who has the confidence and respect of a majority of the American people. That man is FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — to whom should be given dictatorial powers in the approaching crisis.”¹

It is one thing to know, as a generalization, that respectable Americans flirted with dictatorship in the winter of 1932–33. It is quite another to hold a commercially published book in which the proposition is worked out in numbered steps by a financial analyst, and to see that a contemporary reader found the decisive sentence and marked it. Whether that reader bracketed the passage in alarm or in agreement, the pencil does not say. The ambiguity is fitting, because the country itself had not decided.

Porter is nearly invisible to history, and that is precisely what makes him valuable. His title page bills him as a “Nationally known Economist and Financial Analyst” and lists his other works — Profitless Prosperity, Gentlemen of America, Romance of Natural Gas, Research or Retrogression, America’s Greatest Tragedy — titles that place him not in any university but on the investment-commentary circuit of the day.²

His publisher, the Wetzel Publishing Company of Los Angeles, was a small regional house. I have located no academic appointment, no archive of papers, no obituary of substance. In the ordinary run of intellectual history this would disqualify him from attention. For my purposes it does the opposite. The views of Howard Scott were the views of a movement’s impresario; the views of Columbia’s prestigious engineers were the views of an elite faction. Porter is evidence of something else: how far the technocratic idea had seeped into the commercial milieu — the men who wrote market letters, advised investors, and considered themselves hard-headed realists. When a proposal to abolish constitutional government appears in that literature, dressed in the sober vocabulary of financial analysis, the proposal has ceased to be fringe.

The book’s internal architecture makes the point sharper, because Porter did not begin as a radical. Chapter XII, “What Will Roosevelt Do?”, opens on page 55 with sentiments any Hoover-era financial conservative would have signed: “Many people believe that the government is primarily responsible for prosperity, and likewise for depression, when the fact is that the relations of government to prosperity or depression are negative rather than positive.”

Commerce, he continues, “is carried on by the people without government assistance,” its relations “determined by themselves.”³

This is orthodox laissez-faire, stated as a recognized fact. Seventeen pages later, the same author is demanding a dictatorship. The distance between those two positions — traveled within a single short chapter by a self-described practical man — is, I would argue, the single most instructive thing about the book. The depression had not converted such men to collectivism by argument; it had convinced them that the machinery itself, price system and Congress alike, had failed, and that technocratic rationality was the only thing left standing.

Porter’s method of getting from the one position to the other was prophecy. In a chapter grimly titled “Postponing the Inevitable,” he set out a numbered forecast of the collapse he believed the interregnum winter would bring. Dissolution of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, he wrote, “may be expected to bring about the complete collapse of the stock market,” followed by, among other items: “7. Suspension of stock exchanges. 8. Government ownership of railroads and public utilities in an effort to maintain the solvency of our savings banks and insurance companies. 9. A ‘dole’ for the unemployed.” And then the sequence arrives at its destination: “a national awakening which, overnight, may well be expected to herald the news to every corner of the nation of the inauguration of the ‘new deal’ by 10. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — Dictator.”

Lest anyone mistake the dictatorship for the goal rather than the instrument, Porter closes the chapter: “Drastic as these changes from the present order of things may be, they will serve their purpose if only to pave the way for the Economic Revolution — and TECHNOCRACY.”⁴ Notice the small typographic fossil embedded there: “new deal” sits in lowercase, inside quotation marks. When Porter wrote, the phrase was still a fresh coinage from Roosevelt’s Chicago acceptance speech of July 1932, not yet the proper name of an era. The book belongs unmistakably to the narrow window between the election and the inauguration, when everything about the incoming administration was still projection.

The page-72 passage the old reader bracketed completes the argument.

“Assuredly Technocracy will come,” Porter writes. “It is plain that its coming will be delayed by political maneuvering and financial chicanery.”

The nation “shall have to pass through a period of Chaos”; its severity “is wholly within the control of the people”; and the way through is the vesting of “supreme and emergency power” in the one man commanding majority confidence.⁵

Two things are worth stating precisely here. First, Porter was not proposing a coup. His dictatorship seemed self-evident, and in his imagination, temporary — the old Roman logistics model, a magistrate for the emergency, legitimated by “the confidence and respect of a majority.” Second, and more remarkable, the dictatorship is not even the point. It is scaffolding. Congress is to be dismissed and supreme power concentrated so that the technicians can be installed “from top to bottom” and the price system dismantled. Among the era’s many calls for emergency power, this is what makes Porter’s distinctive: he fused the two most electric ideas of that winter — presidential dictatorship and Technocracy — into a single program, each justifying the other.

Dating matters enormously here, and it is a point my research has forced me to insist on: Porter wrote before Technocracy, Inc. existed! The membership organization, with its gray suits, its monad insignia, and Howard Scott’s increasingly wild-eyed pronouncements, was not founded until late 1933.

What Porter knew in 1932 was Technocracy in its first, unorganized incarnation: the public craze. Nobody can call Porter a disciple of Howard Scott.

Walter Rautenstrauch’s Committee on Technocracy at Columbia, formed in the summer of 1932, had lent Scott’s Energy Survey of North America the university’s prestige, and through the last weeks of 1932 the newspapers were saturated with ergs, energy certificates, and the imminent doom of the price system. “Technocracy” in those months was not an organization one joined; it was an idea in the air, unowned and undefined, and precisely because of that, a writer like Porter could pour his own content into the word.⁶

His Technocracy is not Scott’s in detail — it is a financial analyst’s take on a movement that did not yet have a catechism. The book thus preserves something the later literature obscures: what the technocratic idea looked like during its brief window of mainstream respectability, before it acquired uniforms and became a sect.

Nor was the dictatorship half of Porter’s program eccentric in its moment. The leaderless winter produced an entire literature of respectable authoritarianism. Walter Lippmann, the most influential columnist in the country, told Roosevelt to his face at Warm Springs that he might have “no alternative but to assume dictatorial powers,” and told his readers that the danger was not that Congress would give Roosevelt too much power but that it would give him too little. Eleanor Roosevelt herself remarked that if the crisis demanded it, a benevolent dictator might be the only way through.⁷

Barron’s, the prestigious weekly of the financial establishment (e.g., Porter’s own tribe), editorialized in February 1933 for “a genial and lighthearted dictator.”⁸ William Randolph Hearst, the publishing magnate of that day, put the fantasy on film: Gabriel Over the White House, rushed into theaters weeks after the inauguration, shows a president who dissolves Congress and governs as a benevolent strongman, and Hearst intended it as counsel, not satire.⁹ And when Roosevelt, in the inaugural itself, warned that if Congress failed him he would ask for “broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign enemy,” the line drew the loudest applause of the address — applause that, by her own account, frightened the new First Lady.¹⁰ Porter, in other words, was not shouting from the margin. He was saying loudly and systematically what the American center was murmuring.

What of the book’s own reception? After considerable searching, I found that it barely had one, no substantial review in the major press, no evidence of a second printing, no sign that anyone in the incoming administration acknowledged it — and Roosevelt, of course, did not respond to the offer of a crown from a Los Angeles market analyst. The book survives today in a scattering of library copies; the University of California’s copy has been digitized, which is how the text can now be checked against page numbers by anyone.¹¹ Its bibliography entry in the movement’s historiography is a line item, not a discussion. But the obscurity of the artifact should not be mistaken for the marginality of its ideas.

The two halves of Porter’s program — Technocracy and emergency dictatorship — each received a spectacular public verdict within months of publication, and tracing those verdicts is the real reception history of this book.

The Technocracy half collapsed first, and theatrically. On January 13, 1933, Howard Scott, pressed by his Columbia sponsors to answer mounting press skepticism, delivered a nationally broadcast address at the Hotel Pierre in New York that was by every account a rambling disaster. Within days, reporters finished demolishing his credentials — the celebrated engineer had no engineering degree at all — and Columbia cut the Committee on Technocracy loose. By spring, “technocracy” was a vaudeville punchline.

The movement splintered: Harold Loeb’s Continental Committee on Technocracy took the respectable-study route, while Scott regrouped his loyalists and incorporated Technocracy, Inc. in late 1933 — an organizational salvage operation conducted in the wreckage of the craze.⁶ The consequence for Porter’s book was brutal: within ninety days of the inauguration it had become a fossil. Its title yoked Roosevelt to a word that had passed from front page to punchline in a single season, and no one in 1934 needed a tract urging the president to adopt a discredited fad. But fossils are what stratigraphy is made of. Precisely because Porter wrote before the collapse and before the incorporation, his book records the high-water mark — the moment when a financial analyst could believe, in print, that Technocracy was simply coming, “assuredly,” and that the only question was how much chaos would precede it.

The dictatorship half received its verdict in March 1933, and the verdict was subtler: Roosevelt took the emergency powers and declined the dictatorship. The sequence is worth setting against Porter’s numbered prophecy, because the analyst’s scorecard is better than one might expect. The banking system did collapse; the New York Stock Exchange did suspend trading, closing with the banks in the first week of March — Porter’s item 7, briefly literal. The federal government did assume responsibility for relief within weeks (item 9, in the form of federal emergency relief), and it did go into the utility business on a scale unimaginable in 1932 (item 8, partially, in the Tennessee Valley). The Emergency Banking Act was passed, famously, in hours, by congressmen who in some cases never saw the text they approved — government by acclamation if ever the republic practiced it.¹² What never arrived was item 10.

The extraordinary powers of the Hundred Days flowed through Congress, not around it; they were statutory, revocable, and litigated, and when the Supreme Court struck down the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1935, the revocability was demonstrated in the most public way possible.¹³ Roosevelt governed the emergency with the forms of the Constitution intact — which is, historically, the precise thing that separates what happened in Washington in 1933 from what happened in Berlin the same spring. Porter had predicted the crisis accurately and the constitutional outcome wrongly, and the wrongness is the most reassuring fact in this whole story.

And yet, on a third count — the one nobody was polling — Porter half-won. He had wanted Technocrats appointed “from top to bottom,” and while no Technocrat with a capital T ever ran the government, the type arrived in force. Rexford Tugwell, the most Veblen-marinated of Roosevelt’s Brain Trust, spent the decade being denounced in the press as precisely the technocrat-planner Porter had prayed for. Arthur Morgan’s early Tennessee Valley Authority was as near to a working technate as this country has built — engineers, dams, regional planning, and utopian community-building under one federal charter. The National Recovery Administration’s code apparatus, the Resources Planning Board, the rural electrification engineers: the New Deal absorbed the technocratic impulse so thoroughly that the organized movement suffocated for lack of a grievance.¹⁴

This, I think, is the correct frame for Porter’s book in the longer arc I have been tracing from 1932 to 1938: the Technocracy movement failed as a constitutional proposition in the same season it succeeded as a personnel policy. The country refused the dictatorship of the engineers and then, quietly, hired the engineers.

That is why this obscure book repays the attention I have given it. It compresses into ninety-odd pages the entire mechanism by which the technocratic temptation works on practical men: begin with efficiency, proceed through despair of politics, arrive at rule by experts, and treat the constitutional question as a detail of implementation.

Porter traveled that road in seventeen pages, in public, under his own name, with a straight face. His was the sober, business-district version of an idea that was simultaneously being preached in gray flannel by Howard Scott. The road did not close in 1933. It reopens, in politer dress, in every era that loses confidence in its deliberative institutions and finds its engineers still standing; readers may supply their own examples from the present century. Somewhere in 1933 a reader worked through this book, reached page 72, and set a pencil bracket around the sentence offering Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictatorship. The bracket is still there. The question it marks — whether a frightened democracy can borrow the competence of its technicians without surrendering the government to them — is still open, and it is the question my research on these years keeps returning to.

[Part II: Technocrats Call For Dictatorship And Technocracy In 2026 Below Endnotes]

Endnotes

1. Henry A. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy (Los Angeles: Wetzel Publishing Co., 1932), 72. Capitalization as in the original.
2. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, title page.
3. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 55.
4. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 62–63. The chapter is titled “Postponing the Inevitable”; items 1–6 of the forecast precede the page reproduced here.
5. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 72.
6. William E. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), which remains the standard account of the Columbia Committee on Technocracy (organized under Walter Rautenstrauch, summer 1932), the press craze of December 1932–January 1933, Howard Scott’s Hotel Pierre address of January 13, 1933, the exposure of his credentials, and the movement’s subsequent splintering into Harold Loeb’s Continental Committee on Technocracy and Scott’s Technocracy, Inc., incorporated in late 1933.
7. Jonathan Alter, The Defining Moment: FDR’s Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006), on Lippmann’s Warm Springs counsel (“you may have no alternative but to assume dictatorial powers”), his February 1933 columns to the same effect, and Eleanor Roosevelt’s private remarks on the possible necessity of a benevolent dictator.
8. “A genial and lighthearted dictator”: editorial, Barron’s, February 13, 1933.
9. Gabriel Over the White House, dir. Gregory La Cava (Cosmopolitan Productions/MGM, 1933); produced with William Randolph Hearst’s financing and script interventions, from the novel Rinehard by Thomas F. Tweed.
10. Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933. On the applause and Eleanor Roosevelt’s reaction, see Alter, The Defining Moment.
11. The University of California copy is digitized at HathiTrust (catalog record 006517511), permitting page-level verification: babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b273822.
12. David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), on the March 1933 bank holiday, the concurrent suspension of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, and the passage of the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933.
13. A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
14. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream, on the New Deal’s absorption of the technocratic impulse and the movement’s consequent decline; Kennedy, Freedom from Fear, on Tugwell, the Brain Trust, and the planning agencies. On the early TVA as applied technocracy, see also Arthur Morgan’s own writings and the TVA’s founding statute of May 1933.

Original Article: https://www.technocracy.news/deja-vu-technocrats-called-for-dictatorship-and-technocracy-in-1932/

Part II: Technocrats Call For Dictatorship And Technocracy In 2026

Patrick Wood | technocracy.news

On my desk are two texts separated by seventy-five years and joined by a single idea. The first is a physical object: Henry A. Porter’s Roosevelt and Technocracy, published by a small Los Angeles house in 1932, in which a self-described “Nationally known Economist and Financial Analyst” urged the incoming president to accept “dictatorial powers in the approaching crisis,” dismiss the machinery of representative government, and install Technocrats from top to bottom.¹

The second exists only as archived pixels: Unqualified Reservations, the blog Curtis Yarvin began writing in 2007 under the name Mencius Moldbug, in which a San Francisco software engineer urged Americans to accept that democracy had failed, that the government should be run by a chief executive with the powers of a monarch, and that the officer class of the new regime should be drawn from the people who know how to build things.²

Who cares about Curtis Yarvin? Well, arch-Technocrat Peter Thiel reveres Yarvin as his “house philosopher.” J.D. Vance, as a protégé of Thiel, has repeatedly quoted Yarvin’s ideas over an extended period. Specific Yarvin policies, like RAGE, have been explicitly enacted during the Trump Administration. Yarvin matters!

I have spent years with the first text, and the more time I spend with the second, the more convinced I become that they are the same essay written twice — once in the vocabulary of the engineer, once in the vocabulary of the startup founder.

Some precision about names is required first, because the genealogy is loose in the popular telling. Yarvin did not coin the phrase “Dark Enlightenment”; the British philosopher Nick Land did, in a 2012 essay of that title that described, systematized, and extended what Yarvin had been writing for five years.³ Yarvin’s own name for his school of thought was “neoreaction.” Nor is there any documented organizational pipeline running from Howard Scott’s Technocracy Inc. to Yarvin’s movement; no membership rolls handed down, no succession of institutions. The connection is of the kind I have traced elsewhere between the Technocracy movement and the Cold War defense intellectuals: a continuity of ideas, incubated in the same elite class and reactivated by the same conditions.

The Dark Enlightenment stands to the 1930s Technocracy movement roughly as the Cold War technostructure did — a descendant that would indignantly deny the ancestry, and whose family resemblance is for that reason all the more instructive. It is the recurring conviction that the deliberative institutions are obsolete machinery, and that the people who demonstrably make complex systems work have a superior claim to run the state.

What makes the comparison exact rather than merely suggestive is that both programs converge on the same man. Porter made his offer prospectively: writing in the middle of the winter of 1932–33, he prophesied collapse in numbered steps, culminating in “FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — Dictator,” and argued that supreme and emergency power vested in “some one man who has the confidence and respect of a majority” was the necessary passage to Technocracy.⁴

Yarvin makes the same argument retrospectively. Across his writing, and as recently as his January 2025 interview with the New York Times, he has held up Roosevelt as his central American precedent: the president who, in Yarvin’s telling, governed as an elected monarch; commanding a compliant Congress, ruling through new agencies staffed by his own people, adored rather than resisted.⁵ Yarvin does not offer this history as a warning. He offers it as proof of concept.

The presidency, he argues, contains a throne. Roosevelt sat in it. The republic loved him for it. Therefore, the next occupant may sit in it too, this time with a better org chart.

Porter is the prophecy, Yarvin is the application.

Set side by side, the two programs share a complete logical skeleton. Both begin by declaring the existing system not merely failing but already fake. For Porter and the Technocrats, the price system and the Congress that served it were obsolete machinery, kept running past their natural death by “political maneuvering and financial chicanery.”⁶

For Yarvin, electoral democracy is a facade behind which an unelected consortium of universities, media, and permanent bureaucracy actually governs. He calls this “the Cathedral.” ⁷ Both then conclude that the remedy is formal, concentrated, personal power: better an open executive than a hidden oligarchy. Both are explicit that the strongman is not the destination but the instrument — scaffolding for the installation of a new administrative class of Technocrats.

Porter wanted his dictator to appoint Technocrats from top to bottom; Yarvin wants his chief executive to retire the entire civil service — his old acronym was RAGE, “Retire All Government Employees” — and restaff the state with founders and engineers.⁸ And both close with the same soothing clause: Porter’s dictator holds “the confidence and respect of a majority of the American people,” while Yarvin’s monarch answers to a board and can be removed like any failing CEO. In each case the reassurance is hollow, and in each case it is the weakest joint in the structure, for reasons the actual history of the 1930s supplies.

Even the legitimating figure is the same figure, updated for a new economy. In 1932 the engineer stood at the peak of his cultural authority: he had electrified the continent, raised the dams and the skyscrapers, and could plausibly claim to be the one man in American life who demonstrably made things work while the politicians talked.

The Technocracy craze and Porter’s book converted that authority into a political claim. In the 2010s and 2020s the startup founder occupies precisely that position: the builder of platforms and rockets, the one figure who visibly ships while institutions deliberate. Yarvin’s innovation was to convert that authority into a political claim, and his prescription — run the government “like a startup,” with a founder-CEO wielding undivided authority — is Porter’s prescription with the slide rule swapped for the term sheet.

Ninety years apart, the same professional class petitions for the same commission on the same grounds: that competence should replace consent.

The differences are as instructive as the parallels. Scott’s Technocracy was, in its economics, radically anti-capitalist. It proposed to abolish the price system outright and to replace money with energy accounting, which is one reason respectable America could flirt with it only briefly.⁹

Yarvin inverts the economics completely. His “gov-corp” is capitalism absolutized — the state reimagined as a joint-stock corporation, sovereignty as equity, citizens as customers. Private property should be turned over to the gov-corp to manage.

Technocracy dreamed of rule by a faceless technical committee; Yarvin, whose intellectual debts run to Carlyle rather than Veblen, insists on a person, a sovereign, a name. The temperaments differ accordingly: Technocracy was scientistic and positivist, all charts, surveys, and thermodynamics, while the Dark Enlightenment is literary.

The movements’ social forms differ too — Technocracy was a genuine mass movement, with lecture halls, membership sections, and gray uniforms, where neoreaction was born on a blog and traveled through elite patronage, most prominently Peter Thiel’s.¹⁰ And the surrounding weather differs most of all. Porter wrote amid twenty-five percent unemployment and a banking system in genuine collapse; the emergency was not rhetorical. Yarvin writes amid prosperity and polarization, and must therefore manufacture the sense of terminal crisis that 1932 supplied free of charge.

Yet the reception histories rhyme in the way I have come to expect from this material. Porter’s book sank without a review worth finding; within months its title had yoked Roosevelt to a word that had passed from front page to vaudeville punchline, and the book became a fossil.

But the technocratic type was absorbed into the New Deal almost immediately — Tugwell in the Brain Trust, Arthur Morgan on the Tennessee Authority, the planners in a dozen new agencies — so that the idea lost as a constitutional proposition in the very season it won as a personnel policy.

Yarvin’s trajectory inverts the tempo but repeats the shape. His blog was a fringe curiosity for fifteen years, and then the absorption began: a sitting vice president has cited him by name,¹¹ his RAGE proposal was widely recognized as a template for the mass federal workforce removals of 2025,¹² and mainstream interviewers now travel to ask him whether democracy is finished.

There remains the historical question on which the whole comparison turns, and here I part company with both of my subjects. Yarvin’s proof-of-concept, like Porter’s prophecy, requires that March 1933 be read as the moment America accepted a monarch. It was not, and the distinction is not trivial — it is the entire point. Offered exactly the crown Porter described, in exactly the crisis he prescribed, Roosevelt took extraordinary powers through Congress rather than over it: statutory, revocable, and litigated.

The stock exchanges closed and reopened; the banking act passed in hours;¹³ and two years later the Supreme Court struck down the centerpiece of the recovery program in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, and the president — adored, unprecedented, at the height of his mandate — complied.¹⁴ The forms held.

I keep returning to the pencil bracket in my copy — the mark some reader of 1933 set around the sentence offering Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictatorship. I once assumed the bracket belonged to a closed chapter, a curiosity from the era my research covers. I no longer believe that. The technocratic temptation is not a chapter but a recurring season: it arrives whenever a confident technical class meets a discouraged democracy, in 1932 wearing the engineer’s gray flannel, in 2012 posting under a pseudonym, and in our own decade briefing statesmen.

Porter and Yarvin, the obscure analyst and the celebrated blogger, mark two visitations of the same scenario, and the question the bracket asks has not changed in ninety years: whether a frightened or merely frustrated republic can borrow the competence of its builders without handing them the government.

Twice now, America’s answer has been to take the builders and refuse the crown. The Dark Enlightenment is, at the bottom line, a wager that the third time will be different.

Porter was an obscure figure rising out of the financial industry in 1932. Yarvin is a pedestrian philosopher who rose from Silicon Valley in the 2010s. It’s the same playbook to create a coup to implement Technocracy. Reject it all.

References

1. Henry A. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy (Los Angeles: Wetzel Publishing Co., 1932), 72 and title page. Capitalization as in the original.
2. Curtis Yarvin, writing as Mencius Moldbug, Unqualified Reservations (blog, 2007–2014), archived at unqualified-reservations.org.
3. Nick Land, “The Dark Enlightenment” (essay serialized online, 2012).
4. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 62–63 (“Postponing the Inevitable”).
5. David Marchese, “Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening.” New York Times, The Interview, January 18, 2025 — also the source for the run-the-government-”like a startup” and FDR-as-monarch discussions.
6. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 72.
7. Mencius Moldbug, “A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations” (2009), where “the Cathedral” receives its fullest exposition.
8. The RAGE proposal (“Retire All Government Employees”) dates to Yarvin’s 2012 lecture “How to Reboot the US Government”; he revisits it in the Marchese interview, note 5.
9. William E. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), on the abolition of the price system, energy accounting, and the movement’s organizational forms.
10. James Pogue, “Inside the New Right, Where Peter Thiel Is Placing His Biggest Bets,” Vanity Fair, April 2022.
11. JD Vance’s on-the-record citations of Yarvin, beginning with 2021 podcast remarks on mass replacement of the civil service, are documented in, e.g., Ian Ward, “The Seven Thinkers and Groups That Have Shaped JD Vance’s Unusual Worldview,” Politico Magazine, July 2024.
12. For contemporaneous reporting connecting Yarvin’s program to the incoming administration and the 2025 federal workforce reductions, see Jason Wilson, “He’s Anti-Democracy and Pro-Trump: The Obscure ’Dark Enlightenment’ Blogger Influencing the Next US Administration,” The Guardian, December 21, 2024, and subsequent 2025 coverage.
13. David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), on the bank holiday, the Emergency Banking Act, and the Hundred Days.
14. A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
15. See, e.g., the syndicated commentary “The Dubious History of America’s Most Famous Monarchist,” Salt Lake Tribune, January 25, 2025, among the historians’ responses to Yarvin’s readings of FDR and Lincoln.

Original Article: https://www.technocracy.news/part-ii-technocrats-call-for-dictatorship-and-technocracy-in-2026/

...done so as to usher in a new internet. Cancel the old one and launch a new one, one that automatically verifies digital ID and supports the tokenization of everything, under the guise of, ‘well, the old internet has been corrupted by AIs so it is no longer fit for task, and neither do businesses want to advertise to fake people, so we need to start fresh with a more secure, immutable internet.’

Dead Internet: Over 40% Of LinkedIn Posts Are AI, As 'Agentic AI Activity Is Driving A Lot Of Browser Activity'

The WinePress | substack.com/@thewinepress

Rudy Yang, a financial tech analyst at Pitchbook, told Fortune: “Agentic AI activity is driving a lot of the browser activity you’re seeing.”

The dead internet theory is no longer a theory, it is dead internet fact. The WinePress has covered in a number of reports that so much internet activity and content nowadays is driven by or is AI-generated.

A recent report found that LinkedIn is currently the platform saturated the most with AI content.

AI detection platform Pangram reported earlier this month that 40.5% of content on LinkedIn was AI, followed by Medium (a platform to write and share blogposts, similar to Substack) at 30%, X (formerly Twitter) at 24%, and Substack at 10%. A percentage of other posts and content on these platforms have both AI and human-generated content as well.

The researchers at Pangram added:

LinkedIn had the highest AI share of any platform across the board. LinkedIn posts made up a third of scanned items, yet it accounted for nearly two-thirds (62%) of all AI content we flagged. Contrary to what one might expect, people are overwhelmingly willing to use AI to speak on their behalf in professional settings that are associated with their real identity, and less likely to use it on casual and anonymous platforms.

LinkedIn also encourages AI use on its platform in several ways, including a built-in “Write with AI” button (now rebranded “Enhance post,” but still offering AI writing assistance). People are noticing LinkedIn’s growing reputation for slop – perhaps to combat it, an executive at LinkedIn recently announced that the platform would be detecting and downranking AI-generated posts using an in-house algorithm; ironically, the announcement was itself AI-generated. Whether or not the company is attempting to modulate AI in their feed, our users are still seeing a lot of AI writing on LinkedIn.

AI writing is now a problem everywhere on social media. This is concerning, but it’s in line with what we’re seeing elsewhere online: researchers estimated that 35% of newly published websites on the open internet were AI-generated or AI-assisted. An internet that is completely flooded with undisclosed AI content is bleak, but we don’t believe it’s inevitable. We hope that by providing transparency to AI-generated content online, we can give internet users back some control of how they spend their attention.

The studies and reviews continue to pour in: the internet is being dominated by AI, and it will only get worse.

Futurism recently wrote:

Fortune did a roundup of the latest data on the makeup of internet traffic, and most of it points to humans now being a quaint minority.

“There’s a lot of missing pieces of information, but a lot of the observed data suggests the same thing, which is like there is more bot activity,” Rudy Yang, a financial tech analyst at Pitchbook, told Fortune. “Agentic AI activity is driving a lot of the browser activity you’re seeing.”

“They consume the web completely differently than humans do,” Yang told Fortune. “It’s almost like an entire new category, customer category, was created, and it means a lot for businesses because no one, as a business owner, is going to want to silo themselves from being able to serve a completely new customer segment.”

They’re also changing what we see on the web, too. A report published in October from the SEO firm Graphite found that over half of all new English-language articles on the internet were written with AI.

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

As I said, it’s not a theory anymore, it’s a fact. The internet is dead; and I personally think that there is even more AI content presently than these firms are able to detect.

Now we definitely know why there are so many “ghost jobs” and fake job applications on LinkedIn…

The problem also largely rests on the fact that so many businesses and people simply do not care that they proliferate AI content themselves. In a very short amount of time a lot of people have become addicted to AI or have been quite tolerable enough to it.

Job 32:8 But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.

God has inspired us with the ability to create and understand, and to have our own inspiration. AI removes all of that; and we are seeing it with how everything has become so dead and lifeless.

I have said before that the time is rapidly approaching when we will have to simply walk away from the internet, within our reasonable capacity, because it has become totally fake and will only get worse, and by extension further erode our minds.

However, not only is this by design, I believe that it is being done so as to usher in a new internet. Cancel the old one and launch a new one, one that automatically verifies digital ID and supports the tokenization of everything, under the guise of, ‘well, the old internet has been corrupted by AIs so it is no longer fit for task, and neither do businesses want to advertise to fake people, so we need to start fresh with a more secure, immutable internet.’

I believe that that is coming, soon…

Original Article: https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/dead-internet-over-40-of-linkedin

“Operation Warp Speed” was a SPECTACULAR SUCCESS [At killing Americans], in fact, many [other genocidal maniacs] say, one of the most successful [depopulation] things ever done by an American President." ~ Trump

The WinePress | substack.com/@thewinepress

Today, Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared before a Senate Committee hearing led by Kentucky GOP Senator Rand Paul over the origins of Covid-19, something the two have repeatedly squared-off over before.

But before the proceedings began, Fauci announced that he would be pleading the Fifth Amendment and would not answer any questions.

Per NBC:

Dr. Anthony Fauci declined to answer senators’ questions at a contentious hearing Wednesday on the origins of Covid and the government’s handling of the pandemic, saying he would invoke his Fifth Amendment right to avoid the possibility that Republicans use his testimony to prosecute him for perjury.

The surprise decision set the stage for a hyper-partisan hearing that yielded no new revelations about the origins of the coronavirus or the government response to the pandemic. But the absence of Fauci’s testimony presented plenty of opportunities for Republicans and Democrats to present dueling narratives about those issues — and about the doctor himself.

Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee used their allotted time to criticize the doctor’s recommendations during the Covid pandemic as the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, accusing him of providing harmful advice on issues such as lockdowns and of lacking candor on the origins of the coronavirus.

Democrats, meanwhile, came to Fauci’s defense, painting the hearing as a Republican-led effort to entrap Fauci into committing perjury and using their time to focus criticism on the Trump administration’s health care policies.

After Fauci had invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times, committee Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., said as the hearing ended that he would call for a vote to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress. He said after the hearing that the committee would vote on the issue next week.

All the criminals in the country plead the Fifth without fail.

All these hearings are just more daytime soap opera drama. Some yelling and screaming, but nothing else happens. No punishment, no fines, no jail, and nothing more than that.

Per usual, it was a waste of time. Nothing ever happens at these things. It’s good for television and viral clips, but no judgment or justice ever comes of these things.

Paul continues to beat the drum over the origins of Covid — another lie and distraction in and of itself — and has these pow-wows with Fauci.

It’s all so nonsensical. I have already exposed Rand Paul for the fraud and hypocrite he is, as he too was a big promoter of the vaccines when they were being rolled out, how getting vaccinated was a great incentive to take off the masks, the only way “we are getting out of this [pandemic]” is to take the vaccine, elderly who have been vaccinated have a “twinkle in their eye” because they got their freedoms back and feel safe from the vaccine; and would then advocate for the creation of new vaccines later that year because of purported new variants rendering the first batches ineffective.

The man is a total sleaze. Why isn’t he grilling Fauci, Birx, Trump, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and more, etc. for the incalculable number of deaths and irreparable harm caused by the clot shots? Exactly. That’s a no-go zone for these people, can’t talk about that…

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova said it best:

"(Fauci being the main driver behind Covid is) a fairy tale for adults.”

Nevertheless, and notwithstanding, of course, President Donald Trump had to give his input on this drama.

He made sure to once again heap praise upon Operation Warp Speed, which he oversaw in 2020, while also claiming that more people died under Biden than under him. He then tried to craft a narrative that he sidelined Fauci and did not regard his policy recommendations.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote:

“Many more people died of Covid under the Biden Administration than under the Trump Administration.

“Operation Warp Speed” was a SPECTACULAR SUCCESS, in fact, many say, one of the most successful things ever done by an American President.

“I overrode Fauci on this. His ideas were CRAZY! Also, I said from the beginning that the Virus came from the Wuhan Laboratory in China. Fauci strongly disagreed, always trying to protect China. I Inherited Fauci, who was there since the 1980’s, but with each passing day, relied less and less on him. He made too many bad calls, like on MASKS. Remember at the beginning he was an anti-masker. He then switched to a super-masker.

“In any event I didn’t let him shut the Country down, although he wanted to. I went the Federalist way, and let the governors decide. The Republican governors did a much better job than the Dumocrats. Fauci was largely taken out of play, and then along came Sleepy Joe Biden, who made Fauci a “King!” I called Biden to tell him Fauci was no good, either didn’t have a clue, or was dishonest. The call was well received, but sadly, not acted on. Biden went on to give Fauci vast destructive power. The rest is history! President DJT.”

He said something identical in the White House.

However, interestingly, he said he “respects” President Biden’s pardon of Fauci for potential offenses committed between 2014 and January 2025. So Trump has effectively pardoned Fauci as well. No prosecution is coming (let me see your shocked face).

This is certainly not the first time Trump has praised OWS — the whole-of-government order that has completely destroyed people’s lives, families, businesses, and economies around the world forever — such as the case (among many) last year when he commented that OWS was “one of the greatest achievements ever in politics or in the military.”

And as far as the Covid vaccines death shots are concerned, the man absolutely knew what was coming, he understood and understands now what it was all about, as his own administration was preparing for the lockdowns and vaccines in advance. In September 2019, he signed an executive order to create new vaccines using “innovative technologies” in preparation for an outbreak or pandemic. Then in January 2020, a whole week before he announced the prevalence of “coronavirus,” his administration inked a contract with Moderna to produce mRNA vaccines — months before OWS was officially enacted in May.And Fauci? Well, we all remember (at least I remember) when in 2017 Fauci now infamously said that there was going to be a pandemic in Trump’s administration.

“There is no question that there will be a challenge, the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already of ongoing disease.

“But also there will be a surprise outbreak. And I hope by the end of my relatively short presentation, you’ll understand why history, and the history of the last 32 years that I’ve been the director of NIAID will tell the next administration, that there’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with.”

Furthermore, Trump is simply trying to revise history.

On his final day in office during his first administration, January 19th, 2021, “Trump awarded Presidential Commendations to individuals in recognition of their exceptional efforts on Operation Warp,” of which included none other than Fauci, along with Deborah Birx and his son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Of course, when Trump was out making empty campaign speeches in 2024 to get reelected, Trump told Tim Pool that he would prosecute Fauci for lying to Congress.

Furthermore, let’s not forget the times Trump defended Fauci amidst it all, claiming that he, Fauci, and the administration were all working closely together.

On top of that, don’t let us forget the times Trump emphasized that it was he and his administration that forced the lockdowns, and it was the right thing to do.

Never forget.

And again, watch as he, surrounded by his cabinet members, including Fauci and Birx, who supported the necessity of this spending package, all belly laugh as Trump signed into law the $6.2 trillion CARES Act.

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

It’s all lies and deceit, and they all serve their father and god, Satan.

Proverbs 16:29 A violent man enticeth his neighbour, and leadeth him into the way that is not good. [30] He shutteth his eyes to devise froward things: moving his lips he bringeth evil to pass.

For a man who said he was going to “drain the swamp,” tell me, MAGA, how many high-level arrests have there been? Name one, just one. But these people will be hopped-up on hopium again in a week. ‘We got him this time! He’s going down!’ (Insert name).

Original Article: https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/trump-calls-operation-warp-speed

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

Trump, Musk among those leading the brainwashing barrage, playing up the good while ignoring the bad

Leo’s Newsletter | Leo Hohmann | LeoHohmann.substack.com

Last week President Trump told us in a post to his Truth Social account that AI data centers are going to make us all filthy rich. They are cash cows. Money makers. Tax reducers. Job creators, blah, blah, blah. Don’t fight against them, he said. You’re wasting your time. These massive data centers are “liquid gold” and are going to make so many people wealthy that you can’t stop them from being built, the brainwasher-in-chief said.

As he always does with every issue, Trump casts all those who hold an opposing view as Democrats. If you aren’t for what he wants, you must be a Democrat. Of course nothing could be further from the truth as the fight against data centers is one of the most non-partisan issues in America today. Nobody, regardless of political affiliation, is for higher electricity and water rates, draining the reservoirs and aquafers, destroying neighborhoods and property values with noise pollution, while contributing to an AI-powered surveillance state.

However, by casting those fighting these monstrosities as Democrats, Trump is attempting to keep the opposition to his AI free-for-all to a minimum, because no Republican wants to be called a Democrat. I don’t believe it will work, but he’s going to keep trying. Just like he said those pushing for the release of the Epstein files were all Democrats, and those against his disastrous war in Iran are Democrats, yada, yada, yada. Trump never mentions that his own sons, Don Jr. and Eric, are personally invested in the data center boom, as reported by Forbes in an article from Feb. 20, 2025.

Anyway, you get the point. Trump wants thousands more data centers and will tell any lie to get them. That was last week. This week we hear from another member of the billionaire brainwashing club, Elon Musk.

Kurt Cobb at Oilprice.com reports:

“Our tech overlords tell us that artificial intelligence will soon create a world of abundance while solving our major problems such as climate change. Just so you know who I’m talking about, I have previously defined our tech overlords as ‘a grab bag of technology companies, technology scientists and inventors, and technology investors and journalists who have bewitched the modern world through inventions that speed up our daily lives without necessarily making them better.’

“In a recent interview with The Economist magazine, tech overlord-in-chief Elon Musk explained that ‘[i]f you have vast numbers of robots with vast amounts of digital intelligence, you have a sort of a quasi-infinite economy.’ In such an economy, ‘anyone can have anything they think of.’ He added that ‘money won’t matter in 2036’ because everyone will have a high income without working. This is a Star Trek version of the future, he explained.”

Cobb goes on to point out that Musk’s views exemplify the tech industry fantasy of a push-button, voice-activated future world of abundance portrayed in the Star Trek television series and movies. In that fictional series, poverty has been eliminated, people do not need money, and everything they want or need is available to them.

Here’s the critical component of this fantasyland being promoted by the likes of Trump, Musk, Sam Altman, Larry Ellison and the rest of Trump’s technocrat cronies: Cobb notes that in 10 years, “AI will be running the world without humans. If that happens, …how will companies make money? How will they even exist? Musk has no answer.”

And that leads to a second question: How will people get money to buy the things they need from a government that is $40 trillion in debt in an economy poised for a crash?

AI critic Ed Zitron asks AI boosters to explain what current AI models are capable of doing right now without using the word “will.” They have little they can point to.

Nothing current AI models can do remotely fits this view of a fantasyland populated by rich folks who no longer need to work.

Cobb writes:

“Those models—called Large Language Models (LLMs)—produce so many errors that handing over mission-critical systems across the economy to AI as suggested by Musk would almost certainly create catastrophe rather than prosperity. The problem of so-called‘hallucinations’ is an inherent feature of the way LLMs operate and cannot be eliminated. And the kind of intelligence needed to run most mission-critical systems, that is human intelligence, simply isn’t achievable with LLMs.”

It’s slowly becoming obvious that the most realistic applications for AI are for state-sponsored surveillance, using tools such as Flock and Axon cameras and creating military kill lists, with the killings themselves being carried out by AI drones and robots.

Since the U.S. government has killed more people in wars than probably any other government on the planet over the last 30 years (over 1 million in Iraq and Afghanistan alone), it makes sense that it would need the most AI computing power for future wars. Ultimately, I believe America’s high-tech killing machine will be turned against its own citizens. This may be the real reason for so many data centers on U.S. soil. The U.S. already has about 5,400 AI data centers, about five times as many as you will find in China and 25 times as many as in Russia. The U.S. wants at least another 3,000, for a total of nearly 9,000 AI data centers.

“Governments seem ready to pay the high cost of AI in order to obtain better surveillance of citizens and more effective weapons. That such systems will inevitably make many mistakes seems not very consequential to the governments that use them,” Cobb writes.

This is borne out by the fact that Israel’s IDF uses an AI-powered software system called Lavender to create kill lists in Gaza, and the IDF admits this system has an error rate of about 10 percent. And the government is OK with that frightful ratio. The notion that 90 percent of its killings in Gaza are seen as legitimate and 10 percent are carried out against completely innocent and undeserving Gazans is of no consequence to the government.

Ukraine is using similar technology in its war with Russia, while unleashing swarms of AI-powered autonomous killer drones.

How would you like it if your local police department created lists of people to arrest for capital crimes, the punishment for which is death, while admitting that 10 percent of those caught up in the dragnet never committed any crime? Oh well. Off to the electric chair. Too bad, so sad.

This is a real fear given the fact that military technology often ends up in the hands of civilian law enforcement years after it has been rolled out on battlefields.

Cobb concludes:

“Businesses and consumers may be finding some benefit to using AI, especially for enhanced searching on the internet. But the true costs of such limited benefits are many, many times what they are currently paying. And given the way AI works, that is, requiring additional data center capacity for each new user, there are really no economies of scale that will bring down costs. Simply said, each new user costs the AI provider more money. AI as it is currently conceived is unlikely to be profitable except for niche users who find its output worth paying the true costs for.

“The tech overloads have been singing the same tune for years: Trust us, sit back, and let us take you into an ever-grander techno-utopian future. New claims that AI will be the vector for this future are part of a propaganda campaign designed to keep you from having a say about AI and its uses. Fortunately, many communities are saying that they do not want to bear the costs and disruptions of new data centers associated with the AI build-out. That concern needs to be extended to the uses and abuses of AI itself.”

In this inverted reality, orchestrated by high-level chaos magicians in the political and corporate realms, we find everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the mainstream media destroy truthful information, religions destroy spirituality, truth is called lies, slavery is called freedom, war is called peace, and so many are walking among us under the spell of the billionaire brainwashers. Judging by their compliance with the insane Covid mandates, I would estimate that 75 to 80 percent of the American population is effectively mind controlled. Walking zombies. Those still in possession of their critical-thinking skills are now cast as “anti-technology extremists” by the FBI and U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which sees us as a “threat” worthy of being placed on government watchlists, according to a May 26, 2026 report by Wired magazine.

And the snake oil salesmen of technocracy are laughing all the way to the bank.

Original Article: https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/americans-are-being-mind-controlled

Related:

Truth Warriors | Armed With The Truth • United We Stand

Thank you for being one of the individuals in our world that wants the truth. Thank you for reading articles on Truth11.com, for sharing the truth and for speaking the truth. Thank you for being a Truth Warrior!.

Truth11.com is an independent media site. Our mission is to arm you with the truth.

To Help Us In Our Mission, Become A Truth Warrior Subscriber $3 or $11 (USD) Per Month

Aliens Don't Exist, But US Military Black Ops Craft and Holograms Do

Etienne De La Boetie | substack.com/@artofliberty

Scientism’s ultimate Illusion. The goal would be psychological captivity and a New World Order - One World Government. Sounds stupid? Could they produce a matrix?

Dr Ferdinand Santos III | unstabbinated.substack.com

"Using femtosecond lasers (a femtosecond is a quadrillionth of a second, and the lasers transmit bursts that last 30 to 270 femtoseconds), the team can make holograms that are safe to touch. The images are three-dimensional, with resolutions up to 200,000 dots per second. The voxels are light emitted by plasma that's created when the laser's focused energy ionizes the air." (311 Institute)

“The object of the invention is the use of holographic technology in order to obtain dynamic camouflage or concealment systems for objects or persons. It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to develop a holographic camouflage, concealment and defense or optical shielding system... The first is to confuse the enemy in identifying the type of unit, making him believe that the unit is not what it really is, but that it is another type of different unit..." (European Patent (EP4300028B1) detailing the military application of holographic systems)

Cults who sell Sanctuary

The Scientistic cults, and there are many chapels in the religion of Science, hate religion except their own. The supernatural and miraculous are only allowed to exist within the religion of Scientism. Many of the Scientistic true believers are certain that aliens, arising from random chance over the ‘1 billion known galaxies’, have zoomed and zipped over to have a look at this planet, which you the Scientistic cult, will describe as an unimportant pebble tumbling in the inconceivable vastness of the cosmos, scripted to run 585 million miles per annum around the Sun, forever, in a static pattern which makes even science fiction pause.

Miraculously this alien life ‘evolved’, built technology, sorted out the power, flight, fuel, food, radiation, oxygen, battery issues, and found the proverbial planet-needle in the cosmos-haystack mountain, namely our planet. Everyone knows. There is no other explanation.

• Red orbs? Lights? Must be Hans or ET.
• The Black Triangle? No way the US military can make that.
• The hovering craft disappearing in an instant? Must be Darth.
• The loser-drug-addict-’abducted’ on the lonely forest road? Entirely trustworthy.
• Secret communications? Aliens converse in English of course (they are super smart after all).
• All near US Air Force Bases? Just a base-cidence.
• Roswell and the eggheads? Area 51 is a base where Black Ops projects are tested and actualised. Are we to believe that aliens somehow landed and became entangled in an area where US special operations projects already existed as opposed to say, the rest of the planet? More absurdity.
• A few Pilots claiming to see weird objects? As if the US military does not have dozens of BlackOps projects in avionics with a multitude of objects, sizes and shapes….
• All of this happening since WW2? We are more aware, rational, smarter….
• SETI eating through billions in funding without finding a single ‘ET’ radio signal? They will eventually, it takes time (keep sending money and ignore the incongruity of our claims that aliens are already here but we do not pick up signals….).
• JWST, the Hubble Telescope, large terrestrial scopes not finding a single example of an ‘alien encounter’, object, communications or visual? See above.
• 8 supposed ‘Moon missions’ without discovering any evidentiary data of an alien presence? They did and it is hidden on the ‘dark side’ in -250F temperatures which is why they can’t land there again..…(the Apollo films landed on the ‘light side’ in +250 F temps and there is zero evidence from the Apollo movie series that they ‘ventured to the dark side’ where they would have died in the -250F temps….).
• Youtube videos of strange objects? Unlike movies and films these must be true and objects can never be created, edited, inserted, added….sure if you say so.

Overwhelming. I guess we just have to believe ‘The Science’ and the media that we are infested by aliens. There can be no other rational, scientific, intelligent explanation. By the way, the CIA still claims that giants on Mars built canals and pyramids. Matt Damon is on the scene investigating.

Critical Thinking

For the critical of thinking we have expended a great deal of time exposing how the scientific establishment uses abstract equations and ‘mathematical shells’ to manipulate our understanding of reality on paper. But what happens when the manipulation moves off the chalkboard, out of geometry and models and directly into the sky?

The powers who control our view of reality regale the peasants with the Moon, ‘Moon missions’, SpaceX, Mars and the Stars. Distractions and misdirections. A more important endeavour has been underway terrestrially for 70 years. A highly sophisticated infrastructure has been erected to engineer and master the art of optical deception. Technology creating a matrix. Maybe this is more relevant than the latest inane ‘sci fi’ movie or alien-crocumentary.

Part of the alien-matrix-deployment is military-grade holographic technology. This technology is available and mostly undiscussed. Hologrammatic programming accounts for many of the supposed ‘UFO sightings’ since World War II.

Hologrammatic technology poses one of the most profound threats to human sovereignty.

No, it is not a ‘conspiracy theory’. Let’s have a look.

The Post-War Boom: ET in the Sky with diamonds

It is no coincidence that the global obsession with ‘aliens’ and ‘Unidentified Flying Objects’ (UFOs) exploded after the second World War. Back to critical thinking. What happened during WW2 and after? There was a massive funding in military R&D, including hologrammatic programming. During the 1950s, ‘scientists’ discovered that manipulating light, lasers, and atmospheric mediums could yield terrifyingly realistic visual results. But that was not the only vector of dissimulation and reality distortion.

Alongside the theatre of light, we have the mechanical reality of ‘anti-gravity machines’. The Canadians built the ‘Avro Arrow’ project in the 1950s, funded by the US military copying Nazi technology, to produce ‘anti-gravity’ machines, that we now call ‘drones’, that vertically took off and landed. This is denied by AI and the gatekeepers but it was demonstrated for the public in full view and then quietly shrouded and pushed into black ops. Many other firms were involved in anti-gravity military development - all of them went very quiet in the mid 1950s. It is not a leap to assume that the Black Ops efforts were both well funded and successful.

Below is a photo from Edwards Military base from the 1960s. Your standard UFO. The Nazi’s had built similar prototypes. The craft below is the Avro design, built in Canada, taken over by the US military.

The craft was described as an ‘Avrocar’. “The Avrocar was a good start, and the first step on a long road to discovering technology we use today,” states Jeff Underwood, National Museum of the U.S. Air Force historian. This object was built, used and would have been seen if it was tested outside of military bases. Of course the experts, geniuses, AI and information gatekeepers deny this.

The Avrocar was the result of the Canadian military’s desire to develop a supersonic fighter-bomber, capable of vertical takeoff and landing, in the early 1950s. In the history books they usually leave out ‘the vertical takeoff and landing’ part. The original design emanated from a British Aircraft designer, Jack Frost (yes, apparently his real name) and it was Frost’s design which was used by the Canadian aircraft firm, A.V. Roe which used the exhaust from turbojet engines to drive a circular rotor to produce thrust. By directing this thrust downward the turbo-rotor could create a cushion of air under the aircraft, allowing it to float a few feet off the ground, as well as accelerate to high speeds at higher altitudes.

The English invented Hover-craft developed these same principles. Hover-craft designs, using the same physics, pre-date the Avro project. The knowledge, technology and material therefore existed and could have been repurposed for aircraft. Many of these ‘hovering’ aircraft today quite likely employ nuclear power.

For the Avro project, the Canadian government provided the initial seed funding for the prototype, but dropped the project when it became too expensive. Avro offered the project to the U.S. government and military, who took over testing in 1955 and eventually moved the project to Edwards AFB and other locations in the US. Starting in the 1960s, ‘UFO sightings’ near US Air Force Bases started to increase.

Saucers and Triangles

We therefore know that UFO technology has existed for some time, and given the billions invested in flight technology, would have greatly improved in both volume, machine size and capability in the past 70 years. The current forever war in the Ukraine is history’s first major drone-war. Wouldn’t drones account for a large percentage of ‘UFO’ claims? Some drones are the size of small planes. Drone technology traces its antecedents back to WW2. SpaceX is also a part of this tradition with its vertically landing rocket (another ‘private firm’ gone public, which in reality is a part of the US Military-NASA complex). Hovering, ‘anti-gravity’ craft, based largely on drone designs, are the main generators of ‘UFO’ sightings along with holograms.

Consider the TR-3B. This aircraft is allegedly a top-secret, anti-gravity reconnaissance aircraft developed by the US military. It is a huge triangle shaped and very flat plane or remotely controlled drone. It is often observed at night, can silently loiter in the air and vanishes in a sudden state change. The visible bright pulsating lights change through modes giving this ‘UFO’ a supernatural look. Red lights, blue lights, bright flashing lights. These characteristics comport with most UFO sightings.

Fully Identifiable Objects

The National Institute of Discovery Science (NIDS) investigated the ‘black triangle sightings’. Over 150 separate reports from the US, Canada, and Europe were audited. All reports suggested the sighting of a large, low-flying triangle object. From the accounts of independent aircraft designers, the size, thrust, and payload approximations of the black triangle were estimated by NIDS and include a length of ~600 ft; a width of 300 ft; a height of 40 ft; a mass of 100 tonnes and a vertical thrust of 122 tonnes. These are enormous objects, unique in shape, propulsion and attributes, easily conflated with UFOs.

UFOs are therefore IFUMOs - Identified Flying US Military Objects. These black triangular-shaped objects, including the ‘Black Manta’, are massive, brightly lit, and apparently extremely silent. They are often sighted near water and are usually close to military bases. Their ability to quickly accelerate from a hovering position suggests the use of powerful nuclear-based technology, another aspect that is mostly overlooked by both critics and believers. The Black Manta may be designed to conduct intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. It could be deployed to keep a population in a certain area under control.

Balloons are another issue. The photo below is NASA’s ‘flying saucer’ from 2014-15, which was being tested for the ‘(obviously) inevitable mission (film) to Mars. The inflatable balloon apparently ‘passed’ all of the tests to enter Mars’ atmosphere back in 2022. How many ‘UFO’ sightings are balloons, or test vehicles from NASA and the US military? Musk has said that the Mars missions will start in 2026 or 2029. He also promised in 2017 that the Moon bus would start service in 2018. The US military has various groups engaged in these projects producing sundry vehicles that the general public would not recognise nor expect, and when viewed would terrify them as a ‘UFO’.

Darth is not real

For decades, alternative historical analysts and dissenters have argued a compelling case: a vast percentage of unexplained aerial phenomena are not visitors from ‘deep space’, which is entirely dead and barren, but highly calibrated psychological operations conducted right here on this planet using both black operations planes and drones; along with holograms. The true believers in ‘Scientism’ will never understand ‘psyops’ of course and will never believe that their trusted agents - the government, the media, the experts, or the “the millions of people working in “_insert here agency_” - would ‘lie to us’. Surely they love us as much as you love them.

But maybe not. Anti-gravity and hologrammatic technology are in use, they are in production and their multi-faceted intent would include controlling populations, or forcing populations into accepting governmental control. You may have noticed that crisis after crisis has been generated. The use of ‘UFO’ technology is a part of that process. Only the government can save you.

Blueprint of Deception: What is the point of this tech? Obviously military applications are foremost. But also consider this fact. If governments can control what a population physically sees in the sky, they can control how they react on the ground. By using the atmosphere as a giant projection screen, the establishment has spent about 70 years perfecting the tools needed to stage the ultimate visual hoax, if and when that is needed (Bishop, 2005).

The Corona Plandemic was in planning for about 30 years including the creation of technology, patents, implementation patterns and information control processes. This fact is too much for the Fanboys of course. The Corona planning was built on the AIDS and ‘Spanish Flu’ templates. AIDS was and still is, an outrageous project of immorality, money, power and government evil.

Lucy in the Sky with chemicals and violent manipulations is not a theory. It exists. Once-maligned ‘fringe theories’ like ‘geo-engineering’ are now mainstream. Barium, strontium, sulphur and other radioactive toxins are sprayed into the skies across population centres on a scheduled cadence. Governments under FOI request will happily admit this citing of course, ‘Globaloney Boiling-from-plant-food’ as the casus belli. In the UK, atmospheric geo-engineering is coordinated through a project called SATAN (stratospheric aerosol transport and nucleation). Nice acronym. In effect they are poisoning you. The ‘sky is the limit’ when it comes to totalitarian state management, human culling, and remaking reality.

The basis of creating a hologram is to seed the atmosphere with chemicals…..go outside and look up one day and observe.

Holograms - How It Works

The military grade hologram technology has little in common with the primitive equivalent in consumer entertainment. Military-grade projection relies on advanced spatial dynamics (back to sciency stuff, Ochiai, et al, 2016):

• Three-Dimensional Plasma Generation: High-powered lasers to ionise nitrogen and oxygen molecules in the air, creating glowing, physical points of light in mid-air that can mimic rapid, non-inertial movement.
• Aerosol and Chemical Layering: Spraying specific particulate matters into the upper atmosphere to act as a highly reflective, invisible substrate capable of catching multi-angled laser projections.
• Audio-Kinetic Integration: Combining silent visual projections with highly directional, low-frequency sound waves to make the artificial anomaly feel dense, real, and physically present to observers (Altmann, 1999). This is easily achieved with existing technology and can be found in movies.

The above is documented, known, and proven. The distribution of these chemicals is in place. All of this is related to ‘geo engineering’, what your own lying eyes can see happening in the skies. Below is a Hologram light show in China. Fill in a few spaces and you have a more than credible looking and extremely massive object.

Global Threat to Humanity

This is a ‘vector’ threat that is truly global in scope. The end goal, as with the Corona Fraud, Globaloney-Whatevering, ‘Space exploration’, ‘Over population’ and other dogma is to distract, infantilise or terrorise.

1. Manufactured Global Crises

The most obvious danger is the staging of a synthetic cosmic event, a fake extra-terrestrial intervention or a manufactured ‘threat from the Death Star’. If the mass of uncritical thinkers amongst us genuinely believe that an unearthly force is entering our airspace, they will instantly surrender their sovereignty and constitutional rights to a centralised, global authority, baying and braying for ‘emergency management’.

Orson Welles and the invasion from Mars in hologrammatic real time. Orson staged his theatre for a reason and to prove a point - namely the gullibility of the mass. In the 1920s and 30s, the ‘science’ and fake news were convinced (consensus) that life existed on Mars and that Martian civilisation was far in advanced of ours. In the 1950s and 60s the same geniuses moved on to Venus. Both claims are of course assinine (at the end is a simulation of how Orson and his friends might pull off an invasion from Mars today).

Back to sky cartoons.

2. Demise of Empirical Trust

It is well documented that when holographic projection achieves absolute fidelity, your own eyes become unreliable witnesses. There are ‘whistler blowers’ who have seen holograms up close and maintain that they could have ‘touched’ the hologram it was so real (see video below around 3 minutes). Hologrammatic technology is now so advanced, so you can indeed the feel the object, its texture and metallic shell.

Thousands of people in Phoenix Arizona in 1997 watched a hologram or a synchronous set of Black-Ops craft (at night) of a spaceship, 1 mile wide, move past them and almost every single observer was convinced it was real. Lives were changed they said. Large headed aliens must be real they intoned. I will never the same again they declared. Few if any applied any deep critical thinking to what they claim to have witnessed (search Richard Curtis Phoenix Lights original video which shows a fraction of what is claimed with few bothering to venture real, material causal factors).

I would guess that this was a test pilot, released by a nearby US Military base, most likely Yuma, famous for Black Ops testing.

If the establishment can project flawless, mid-air structural illusions 30 years ago, or deploy craft (balloons, black ops drones or planes) in a sychronous display, they could certainly fabricate airborne military threats, anomalous religious manifestations (will Christ reappear or more likely Buddha, Shiva, or mad Muhammad with his 20 sex slaves?), or terrifying aerial spectacles to manipulate geopolitical outcomes at will.

The only questions are; why haven’t they done so yet, or, when will they attempt it?Probably the technology is currently too immature and insufficient to sustain a vast illusion over any length of time; and does not yet have regional, global (multi-nodal, synchronised) distribution capability.If hologrammatic and physical stealth craft technlogy were to be deployed to create the environment for a lockdown and subjugation, it would have to be a perfectly arranged, flawless implementation, on a global scale, or at minimum within a targeted region, aligned with coordinated propaganda.The Corona plandemic proved that the mis-information complex was in place. The rest is probably pending and in testing.

3. Psychological Subjugation

On this stack we cogently argue that much of ‘mainstream science’ is in fact rubbish and unproven. But take it further.

Creating Einsteinian fantasies in maths and models, or manufacturing the painfully obvious frauds of Apollo or Artemis II, is the child’s playroom of Scientistic ambition. Move over to the adult sitting room. Holographic manipulation is the ultimate tool of Scientism turned tangible. By dictating the visual reality of the sky, the institutional globalists, the ‘Scientistic elite’ wearing white jackets with concerned faces who will confirm that the hologrammatic Death Star ridden by Messiah Einstein and hovering over the Pentagon is a physical entity; this deranged cult allied with Satan; could alter public consensus instantaneously.

Hologrammatic programming represents a form of psychological captivity where humanity is forced to live inside a literal digital matrix projected across the troposphere (Friedman, 1998).

Back to Neo.

Bottom Line

Technology has never been neutral; it reflects the objectives of the structures that fund it. The same is true of maths, models and theories. We look critically at the abstract mathematics used to hide the physical universe. We need to apply the same absolute skepticism to the spectacles orchestrated in the aether of our planet.

They will persist. From Apollo to Artemis, from Mars to Venus, from SETI to the loser who maintains large headed freaks entered his bedroom and ‘abducted’ him. Back to Ockham, common sense and physical reality. The next time the Fake News and Fake Science promote a ‘supernatural extraterrestrial object or incursion’, or the White House releases yet more photos showing blinking ‘red lights’ which must be ET orbs; look for the projectors on the ground, or Black-Ops projects in the skies.

This is our reality: aliens no more exist than Einstein’s Relativity, or the bacteria through ‘survival of the fittest or sexiest’ became a bat, a badger or a budgie. All part of the psyops.

At some point in response to a plan, or an emergency event, the powers that run the world in the background and backrooms could refocus the space films from fake Moon-missions, back to our stratosphere and deploy the sky cartoons. I would sugget that you prepare yourself informationally, spiritually, mentally, physically, financially if and when they deploy holograms and Black-Ops drones and planes in widespread violence and anger. That day might well arrive. 30 years ago who really thought that a Corona Plandemic would be put into operation so successfully, easily, and embraced with such willing, enthusiastic, compliance and obeisance by the general population?

All hail.

Nota Bene.

How to do it - Orson Welles updated: Simulation, ‘Operation NWO’

Welles knew the population was gullible and will believe almost anything as long as it is broadcast on reputable channels with authority.

When to do the Welles-follow up?: Summertime is best, easiest to plan, most stable atmosphere and daylight, though Welles staged his on October 30th - autumn.

Time: 19:45-20:00, or dusk just before the sheeple earnestly graze on ‘Prime Time TV’ (Welles aired his show at 8 pm)

Where: Major Metropolitan Area most likely in the Excited States where Hollyweird is the national cult and most people believe that the idiot box is reality and truth

Phase 1: Prep for the cooking (Atmospheric Seeding)

Yes, geo-engineering is 100% real. When you cook, you prep. High-altitude aircraft deploy an invisible, reflective aerosol particulate layer (often metallic nanoparticles) into the troposphere.

• What you will see: A hazy, slightly iridescent sunset. Nothing immediately threatening, just a thin, unnatural cloud cover reflecting the fading light. The idiots will blame ‘Globaloney Boiling’. If anyone looks at the sky anymore they might notice it looks a little weird but will probably look back down at their phones and worry about ‘their team winning the big game’.

Phase 2: The Grid Lock (Laser Targeting)

Dusk turns into evening and darkness. Now the actors come on stage. Terrestrial military installations, naval vessels, and low-earth-orbit satellites synchronise their targeting systems. Back to Apollo and the Artemis II-Orion mini Van frauds.

These actors lock onto the specific coordinates of the aerosol cloud cover above the city.

• What you will see: Nothing yet. The lasers operate outside the visible light spectrum (infrared and ultraviolet). The ‘projectors’ are entirely hidden from the civilian populace.

Phase 3: Plasma Ignition (The Hologram cometh)

The intersecting lasers pulse at varying frequencies. Where the beams cross within the seeded atmosphere, they will hyper-excite the nitrogen and oxygen molecules, ionising them into glowing, three-dimensional plasma (Ochiai et al, 2016). Ah, but remember, plasma does not exist….Einstein say.

• What you will see: Now the magic arrives. Suddenly, a massive, luminescent, geometric shape materialises in the night sky. Because it is made of light and plasma, not physical mass, it can perform impossible physics.
• That is the key. It is not a physical object. It is distorted light.
• The object will move, dart, and meander across the sky at Mach 20, making impossible right-angle turns, and will likely hover silently without any visible propulsion or exhaust.
• Back to bad Hollyweird movies.

Phase 4: Audio-Kinetic Integration

More sciency stuff. Now they need to sell it. To prevent the anomaly from feeling like a mere light show, ground-based acoustic arrays deploy targeted infrasound (extremely low-frequency sound waves) (Altmann, 1999).

• What you will see and feel: The air around you will appear to vibrate. Cue the secular Jew Spielberg. You will feel a deep, physical rumble in your chest and stomach. Your brain immediately associates this deep vibration with massive physical weight and power, convincing your senses that the object in the sky is a colossal, metallic craft. You will convince yourself you can touch it.

Phase 5: The Narrative Overlay (Psychological Subjugation)

Within minutes of the manifestation, local power grids might be intentionally disrupted using electromagnetic pulses (EMP) to heighten the panic. EMPs have long existed and have been used to generate discord and confusion. The EMP ‘attack’ will be blamed on Darth Vader hovering in his scary Death Star above the Pentagon.

Fake News networks, fed pre-scripted talking points, break into emergency broadcasts:

• ‘Breaking Emergency news, an unprecedented contact and aerial threat. From the hovering Death Star above the Pentagon. ET has sent a message and our unknown sources inform us that he has stated the following: on his first reconnaissance here some 50 years ago, he maintains that he was subject to alienism, racism, and sexual abuse. He has returned with Darth Vader and is demanding justice and $ 1 Zillion in payments for his trauma. If these demands are not granted, Darth has threatened he will unleash an all out attack on the US with his white suited and helmeted troopers who cannot fight or shoot straight. President Kamlalalalarama is too inebriated to give a statement at this time but the White House is deeply, deeply concerned and is considering all options including laughing like hyenas. This is a live and fluid event, we will keep you informed’.

The Result: Total psychological capture.

Governments state that air defences, advanced technology and nuclear bombs are of no use against the invasion, which now constitutes hundreds of Death Stars, clearly visible across major cities. The sheeple panic. They are terrified, shooting off their guns or waving their spoons in the air in defiance. Children are herded into basements, shelters, safe areas, or the woods. Idiots called politicians demand martial law. Experts say that White racism and alien-phobia are to blame.

As usual 80% of the traumatised herd will howl for an immediate government response, a military intervention, lockdowns and more action to save the world. Civil liberties are exchanged for security in about 20 minutes. Constitutions, rights and laws meet their auto da fé. Within hours a ‘global council of free nations’ meets and declares the necessity for a One World Government and the abolition of nations and freedom – in the name of thriving democracy and ‘liberal’ values and in order to militarily counter the ET invasion.

Fantastical? The Corona plandemic provided some of the runbooks for this exercise. The rest might be in testing. Who knows. Maybe Orson was a little ahead of his time and technology.

All hail.

Sources

Altmann, J., 1999. Acoustic weapons—a prospective assessment. Science & Global Security, 7(3), pp. 165-234. (Provides the scientific and military framework for how targeted low-frequency sound and infrasound are used to induce physiological and psychological effects, supporting the ‘audio-kinetici-integration’ phase).

Baudrillard, J., 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (A foundational philosophical text on how institutions replace physical reality with symbols and signs, supporting this post’s conclusions on the death of empirical trust and psychological subjugation).

Bishop, G., 2005. Project Beta: The Story of Paul Bennewitz, National Security, and the Creation of a Modern UFO Myth. New York: Paraview Pocket Books. (Documents the verified historical use of the UFO phenomenon by US intelligence agencies as a psychological operation and cover-up for advanced aerospace testing).

Friedman, H., 1998. Deception in War. Woodstock: Overlook Press. (A comprehensive historical audit of military deception tactics, optical illusions, and psychological warfare used by the establishment to manipulate enemy and domestic perceptions).

Ochiai, Y., Kumagai, H., Hoshi, T., Rekimoto, J., Hasegawa, S. and Makino, Y., 2016. Fairy lights in femtoseconds: aerial and volumetric graphics rendered by focused femtosecond laser combined with computational holographic fields. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 35(2), pp. 1-14. (A peer-reviewed scientific paper demonstrating the real-world physics of using high-intensity intersecting lasers to ionise atmospheric air and create glowing, 3D plasma graphics in mid-air).

Source: https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/aliens-dont-exist-but-us-military

Original Article: https://dailynewsfromaolf.substack.com/p/aliens-dont-exist-but-us-military

Support Truth11.com With A $3 or $11 (USD) Monthly Subscription

Thank you for supporting independent media. Your subscription is directly helping us cover costs to keep Truth11.com going! Thank you Truth Warriors!

Choose Your Subscription Amount $3, or $11 (USD) Per Month

MP | A Truth Warrior Reader of Truth11.com

What if you woke-up one day and realised that you do not live on a spinning globe? 
What if everyone else suddenly realised that Earth is not a planet? 
No planet would mean no solar system, no galaxy and no universe. 
That would mean no Big Bang, no primordial soup, no dinosaurs and no evolution from monkeys. 
It would mean dogs were always intended to be man’s best friend and horses intended to be ridden. 
More importantly, it would mean that everything on Earth, including you, is here for a reason. 
It would mean the Earth is the centre of everything and that it is a closed system with a firmament of rotating stars above. 

You would suddenly appreciate that the Sun is just up there in the sky, providing localised heat, light, energy and time. 
The same-sized Moon, also in the sky, is there to light the night and provide monthly cycles. 
Without the fiction of dinosaurs, the myth about fossil fuels would become revealed. 
Natural oil and gas, both abiotic and self-replenishing, are there to provide natural sources of fuel. 
The Great Deep, below the pillars of the Earth, provides primary water to the source of rivers, even in times of no rainfall. 

What if these simple revelations got out? 
It would be the end of the greatest Luciferian deception of all. 
It would instantly remove any legitimacy of the ruling Hierarchy of Power. 
Billions in funding for NASA would stop. 
The alleged scarcity of fossil fuels would cease. 
All school education curricula would have to be re-written. 
It would instantly bring an end to the New World Order, Deep State, Illuminati, or whatever other name they hide behind. 

Whether you know it or not, your entire life depends upon the nature of the Earth on which you live. 
Most people will live and die believing that they resided on a giant spinning globe, hurtling off into an endless, ever-expanding abyss.
What a pointless existence, just for the sake of existing. 
However, an increasing number of people are starting to see cracks in the spinning globe hypothesis. 
Arguably, this gigantic Luciferian deception is the glue that holds the house of cards together. 
All it would take is a series of revelations and the glue would melt, collapsing the evil cabal that control the puppet strings of humanity. 
That day is coming. 
After all, we are living in a time of revelations. 
Never, ever think that you are powerless against the ruling ‘elite’. 
Rather, proudly stand-up as a small cog in the unstoppable wheel of truth. 
Truth will bring down the followers of Satan – aka Lucifer, Moloch and Baal. 
Truth about the flat, stationary realm we call Earth will be a fundamental part of it. 

What if ‘the sky is the limit’ because of the firmament above? 
What if the horizon is named according to its’ horizontal state? 
What if ‘sea level’ actually means that water always finds its’ own level? 
What if the Sun and Moon are the same size, resulting in periodical eclipses? 
What if there is no such thing called gravity, explained by anything heavier than air falling to the ground? 
What if the entire spinning globe earth belief is a very clever Satanic deception? 
What if the globe earth proves that Satan exists? 
What if you have been deceived your whole life? 
What if you had the courage to challenge that conditioning? 
What if you wake-up tomorrow knowing that you live on a flat, stationary Earth? 

Every human being on this Earth was born a unique genius. 
Everyone has the innate ability to discern the truth, if they really want to. 
All they have to do is pause, and think. 

 Learn to trust your senses. 
Spend time appreciating the natural world around you. 
And, if you allow yourself to admit it, the realisation of living on a flat, stationary Earth will unlock the absolute wonders of nature. 

 The truth will set you free. 

Related: