A fruitarian diet can provide fiber and antioxidants but may leave the body short of protein and essential nutrients.
The post What happens to your body when you eat only fruit? appeared first on BOL News.
Scientists find evidence that microscopic metal debris can reach the brain, while its long-term effects remain unclear.
The post What happens to joint implants over time? appeared first on BOL News.
The minister said a telemedicine center would be launched at PIMS to help reduce the burden of patients.
The post Mustafa Kamal reviews fire safety, cooling systems at PIMS appeared first on BOL News.
The database also supports Saudi Vision 2030, particularly its Health Sector Transformation Program.
The post Saudi Arabia launches first ‘National Food Composition Database’ to promote health appeared first on BOL News.
Left image: The Raising of Lazarus, 1857, Léon Joseph Florentin Bonnat. Right image: Annas and Caiaphas by James Tissot, between 1886 and 1894. Bible verse is from John 11:53.
by Brian Shilhavy
I previously wrote about how a man born blind who was healed by Jesus and received his sight, resulted in the formerly blind man being kicked out of the church.
Not only was he kicked out of the church, but everyone else who believed that he received his sight through Jesus was also threatened with being kicked out of the church, because this healing was not approved by the religious and health authorities, and it was done on the “Sabbath” which was illegal. See:
This forced Jesus and his disciples to leave the area and hide, as the Jews looked for ways to arrest Jesus.
However, Jesus returned to the area later, in an event that sealed his fate among the Satanic Jews, where he actually brought a man back to life after he had been dead for four days.
After learning that his friend Lazarus was sick, Jesus purposely stayed behind to allow him to die, and then only decided to go see his sisters after he knew that Lazarus was already laid into a tomb. So this was clearly a pre-planned event by Jesus, knowing full well what the consequences would be.
His disciples were not too eager to follow him back to Judea:
Yet when he heard that Lazarus was sick, he stayed where he was two more days.
Then he said to his disciples,
“Let us go back to Judea.”
“But Rabbi,” they said, “a short while ago the Jews tried to stone you, and yet you are going back there?”
(John 11:6-8)
Jesus assured them that this was all part of God’s plan, but they were still hesitant, and literally thought they were all going to be killed by the Jews by following Jesus back to Judea.
Then Thomas (called Didymus) said to the rest of the disciples,
“Let us also go, that we may die with him.”
(John 11:16)
In 1896, artist Henry Ossawa Tanner brought Lazarus to the forefront of popular culture in Paris, entering Resurrection of Lazarus in the Paris Salon, winning a medal. It was so respected that the French government bought the painting. Source.
With the Satanic Jews already very upset and very nervous about the fact that Jesus had healed a man born blind, Jesus now takes his ministry a step even further, by daring to raise a dead man from his grave, demonstrating his power over not only the ruling Jews, but over Satan himself.
John starts the story with Jesus meeting the two sisters outside of town (he did not dare to enter the town yet, because many Jews were there and it would have been too dangerous).
On his arrival, Jesus found that Lazarus had already been in the tomb for four days.
Bethany was less than two miles from Jerusalem, and many Jews had come to Martha and Mary to comfort them in the loss of their brother.
When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went out to meet him, but Mary stayed at home.
“Lord,” Martha said to Jesus, “if you had been here, my brother would not have died. But I know that even now God will give you whatever you ask.”
Jesus said to her,
“Your brother will rise again.”
Martha answered,
“I know he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.”
Jesus said to her,
“I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
“Yes, Lord,” she told him, “I believe that you are the Christ (Messiah), the Son of God, who was to come into the world.”
And after she had said this, she went back and called her sister Mary aside.
“The Teacher is here,” she said, “and is asking for you.”
When Mary heard this, she got up quickly and went to him.
Now Jesus had not yet entered the village, but was still at the place where Martha had met him. (John 11:17-30)
With the two sisters of Lazarus now coming outside the town to meet him, Jesus had the crowd on his side, and proceeded to do what he had traveled there to do.
When the Jews who had been with Mary in the house, comforting her, noticed how quickly she got up and went out, they followed her, supposing she was going to the tomb to mourn there.
When Mary reached the place where Jesus was and saw him, she fell at his feet and said,
“Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died.”
When Jesus saw her weeping, and the Jews who had come along with her also weeping, he was deeply moved in spirit and troubled.
“Where have you laid him?” he asked.
“Come and see, Lord,” they replied.
Jesus wept.
Then the Jews said,
“See how he loved him!”
But some of them said,
“Could not he who opened the eyes of the blind man have kept this man from dying?”
Jesus, once more deeply moved, came to the tomb. It was a cave with a stone laid across the entrance.
“Take away the stone,” he said.
“But, Lord,” said Martha, the sister of the dead man, “by this time there is a bad odor, for he has been there four days.”
Then Jesus said,
“Did I not tell you that if you believed, you would see the glory of God?”
So they took away the stone.
Then Jesus looked up and said,
“Father, I thank you that you have heard me. I knew that you always hear me, but I said this for the benefit of the people standing here, that they may believe that you sent me.”
When he had said this, Jesus called in a loud voice,
“Lazarus, come out!”
The dead man came out, his hands and feet wrapped with strips of linen, and a cloth around his face.
Jesus said to them,
“Take off the grave clothes and let him go.”
(John 11:31-44)
To the people who knew and loved the family of Lazarus, this was the most amazing miracle that had ever been done in the history of the world, and the news spread fast!
To the ruling Satanic Jews, this was the worst sin that Jesus had committed to date, because it completely destroyed their power base in Satan’s world order.
So they immediately began to make plans to execute him, thinking that his execution would eliminate their problems.
Therefore many of the Jews who had come to visit Mary, and had seen what Jesus did, put their faith in him.
But some of them went to the Pharisees and told them what Jesus had done.
Then the chief priests and the Pharisees called a meeting of the Sanhedrin.
“What are we accomplishing?” they asked.
“Here is this man performing many miraculous signs. If we let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and then the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation.”
Then one of them, named Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, spoke up,
“You know nothing at all! You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”
He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one.
So from that day on they plotted to take his life.
Therefore Jesus no longer moved about publicly among the Jews. Instead he withdrew to a region near the desert, to a village called Ephraim, where he stayed with his disciples.
(John 11:45-54)
Jesus is still a threat to Satan’s world order today, and the Satanic Jews have continued to try and stop people from believing in and following Jesus since the First Century.
They failed miserably in the First Century, because even though they were afraid that the Romans would come and take over their city if they allowed Jesus to live, after they executed Jesus, Jesus just rose from the dead and continued his ministry in his resurrected state, and then the Romans came anyway in 70 AD and destroyed their temple and their city, ending the Jewish nation.
But in 1948, after World War II, the Zionist allies began their reign of terror on the Palestinians living in the area that was formerly Israel, and setup their own Jewish nation that today is still practicing genocide against the Palestinian people, while also attacking Lebanon and Iran, all with U.S. weapons in the current Trump Zionist regime.
There is no doubt that this was the main reason that Trump was put back in power in 2025, and then began the Iran War.
The Satanic Jews use the Noahide Laws to try and solidify their power worldwide, promoting the Jews as the “chosen people” at the expense of everyone else, and making it a sin, punishable by death, to believe that Jesus is the Jewish Messiah.
I published an article in 2024 explaining that the Zionists in the House of Representatives under Trump have been trying to implement the Noahide Laws in the U.S. disguised as “Antisemitism” bills. See:
And now, in November of this year (2026), the “most committed Noahide leaders from around the globe will gather in Jerusalem — to formally establish the World Noahide Movement.”
They have put up an official website that describes, for the first time in public to my knowledge, just what the Noahide Laws are.
From their website:
Why This? Why Now?
For two thousand years, the words of Israel’s prophets waited. We waited.
The people of Israel returned home. The State of Israel was built. And now, quietly, tens of thousands of non-Jews on multiple continents are choosing to live by the universal moral laws given at Sinai to all humanity. They are called Noahides . They are awakening. They are organizing. And for the first time in history, they have an address: Jerusalem .
This November, the most committed Noahide leaders from around the globe will gather in Jerusalem — to formally establish the World Noahide Movement.
The question is not whether this will happen. It’s happening.The question is who will be there when it does.
You Will See With Your Own Eyes That You Are Not Alone.
For most Noahides, the journey is often lonely. You study. You speak to the Creator. You attend online classes.
This congress will change all this.
For four days, you will live alongside fellow Noahides from six continents. So far we have registrants from: Bolivia, France, Germany, the United States, India, Israel, Georgia, Canada, the Netherlands, Mexico, Chile, the United Kingdom, Senegal, Switzerland, New Zealand, South Africa, and Lithuania.
You arrive feeling isolated. You leave knowing you are part of an international family.
I personally highly doubt that the Noahide Laws will ever be implemented in the U.S.
The Zionists chose Donald Trump to try and implement this, and that was their biggest mistake, in my opinion.
Because now the whole world knows that Trump worked together with Jeffrey Epstein and is also a pedophile just like everyone else in Epstein’s network.
And the most damaging parts of the “Epstein Files” have still not been released, and are allegedly being used to leverage Trump.
But this does not mean that the Zionist religious fanatics, most of whom are Evangelical Christians, are no longer a danger to the U.S. and the rest of the world.
Israel still has the “Samson Option” where they could try to destroy the Middle East through nuclear warfare, especially since they have been unable to defeat Iran. See:
There are also rumors that false flag attacks could happen in the U.S. with events even more devastating than 9/11, where Trump could theoretically try to stop the midterm elections, and implement something like martial law which could potentially include the Noahide Laws. See:
Whatever does happen, there is one thing I am quite sure about: Satan will fail, just as he has historically when trying to stop people from believing in and following the true Jewish Messiah, Jesus Christ.
However, if Satan’s worldly throne currently is in the United States, the revived Roman Empire, Americans could suffer the most when God deals his next blow against the Satanic world system.
This is not consistent with the false, Dispensationalist Evangelical views of end time prophecies, and they will be the most surprised that things did not go their way after all, as they suffer the consequences of God’s judgment against this nation instead of being “raptured” out of the world to be spared the devastation that is coming.
Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
By their fruit you will recognize them.
Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?
Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.
Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.
Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’
Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ (Matthew 7:15-23)
Related:
Comment on this article at Created4Health.org.
This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)
See Also:
Having problems receiving our emails? See:
If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.
If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.
The post The Last Event in the Life of Jesus that Caused His Execution – The Coming Noahide Laws first appeared on Health Impact News.
Running with Rachel Entrekin must be pretty wild—she encourages competitors and stops mid-race to pet dogs. But her personality is even bigger off the course. Tough and empathetic, her running success has come after 13 years of hard work and a battle to transform an addictive, perfectionist past into a healthier relationship with food, rest, and herself. And even as success came and ultramarathons were won, she watched opportunities go to her male competitors. Gloria Liu honors the incredible achievement of “smashing records while battling impostor syndrome and the fragility of your own self-worth in a world enamored with men, and their accomplishments.”
The key word, however, is average. As any female runner who’s ever passed a dude working himself into a froth to stay ahead of her on the trail knows, women beat men on an individual basis daily. And as athletes like Entrekin and Dauwalter have shown, they do so, occasionally and spectacularly, even at the elite level. We have an understandable reflex to point to categorical advantages that might explain why women can do this, Malcolm says: “It’s inherently feel good, the David and Goliath aspect of a woman winning outright.”
But in searching for the advantages we hope all women have, we may be missing a simpler truth: Most men are faster than most women, but some women still beat most men. The point is not that we have any advantage. The point is that they have almost every advantage—and we still win.
The concern is gaining attention as low-calorie sweeteners become increasingly common in food and drinks.
The post Common sweetener ‘Xylitol’ linked to cardiovascular and stroke risk appeared first on BOL News.
The US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) decision to allow 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products to carry a specific reduced-risk claim has created a striking contrast with the direction of European Union policy, as Brussels prepares new product rules and proposes EU-wide taxation of nicotine pouches.
The United States Food and Drug Administration has authorised 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products to be marketed with a statement informing adult smokers that completely replacing cigarettes with the pouches can reduce the risk of several serious diseases.
The decision, issued on 30 June 2026, represents the first time that the FDA has granted Modified Risk Tobacco Product orders to nicotine pouches.
“Using ZYN instead of cigarettes puts you at a lower risk of mouth cancer, heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis.”
The orders cover ten varieties of ZYN, each sold in nicotine strengths of 3mg and 6mg. The products include Chill, Cinnamon, Citrus, Coffee, Cool Mint, Menthol, Peppermint, Smooth, Spearmint and Wintergreen.
The manufacturer, Swedish Match USA, is owned by Philip Morris International. The products had already received FDA authorisation to remain on the US market in January 2025, but the new decision goes considerably further by permitting a specific comparative health claim.
The FDA said its decision followed an extensive scientific review and was intended to give adult tobacco users accurate information about differences in risk between products.
“FDA’s review of modified risk products is intended to ensure that adult users have clear, science-based information about the relative harms of tobacco products, so they can make informed choices,” said Bret Koplow, acting director of the FDA’s Centre for Tobacco Products.
The ruling does not mean that ZYN is harmless, nor does it approve the products as medicines or smoking-cessation treatments. Nicotine is addictive, and the FDA continues to advise people who do not currently use tobacco or nicotine not to begin.
The significance of the decision lies instead in the regulator’s formal recognition that nicotine products can present very different levels of risk.
A crucial qualification is contained in the phrase “instead of cigarettes”. The authorised claim applies to smokers who replace cigarettes with ZYN. It does not promise the same reduction in risk to consumers who use nicotine pouches while continuing to smoke.
Cigarettes burn tobacco, creating smoke containing toxic substances responsible for most smoking-related cancers, cardiovascular disease and respiratory illness. Nicotine pouches deliver nicotine through the lining of the mouth without burning tobacco or producing smoke.
This difference is central to the principle of tobacco harm reduction: smokers who cannot or do not wish to stop using nicotine may nevertheless reduce their health risks by moving away from combustible products.
The FDA’s decision therefore recognises an important distinction that is frequently blurred in political debate. A product can be addictive and unsuitable for non-users while still being substantially less dangerous than smoking.
UK-based public health commentator Clive Bates, a former director of Action on Smoking and Health, has argued that nicotine pouches could deliver benefits comparable to those associated with the use of Swedish snus in Scandinavia.
“Tobacco-free nicotine pouches with a consumer acceptable nicotine content have the potential to benefit public health in the same way that is documented for Swedish snus in Scandinavia, that is, by serving as a low-risk alternative to cigarettes”, Bates said.
“The European Commission should pay close attention to FDA’s exhaustive process and extensive reasoning. It’s unusual to have anything good to say about the Federal government these days, but this is an important exception, where the right answer has been reached for the right reasons”, he added.
Bates has also argued that poorly designed regulation, including excessively low nicotine limits, could make pouches less effective as substitutes for cigarettes and unintentionally protect the market for combustible tobacco.
The American ruling comes at a particularly important moment for the European Union.
The European Commission is simultaneously advancing a formal proposal to overhaul tobacco taxation (TED) and preparing a broader revision of the EU legislation governing tobacco and nicotine products, their presentation, sale, advertising and promotion.
Nicotine pouches are not comprehensively regulated at EU level under the current Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). Because they contain nicotine but no tobacco, they fall outside many of the harmonised provisions that apply to cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, heated tobacco and electronic cigarettes. The result is a fragmented European market.
Some member states permit nicotine pouches subject to national restrictions. Others have introduced nicotine limits, packaging and warning requirements or advertising controls, while France has pursued a prohibition.
Different national rules create uncertainty for consumers and manufacturers and complicate enforcement across the EU’s internal market.
The Commission’s April 2026 evaluation of the European tobacco-control framework identified the rapid growth of nicotine pouches, electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products as one of the main challenges that existing EU legislation is no longer adequately equipped to address.
The evaluation concluded that EU rules had contributed to falling smoking rates and smoking-related deaths but were failing to keep pace with changes in products, marketing practices and consumer behaviour.
The EC is particularly concerned about the use of novel nicotine products among children, adolescents and young adults. However, the FDA decision introduces an additional issue that EU policymakers will now find difficult to avoid: whether new EU rules should recognise differences in risk between combustible cigarettes and smoke-free nicotine products.
The emerging difference between Washington and Brussels is not simply that one jurisdiction is permissive and the other restrictive.
The FDA subjects nicotine products to an exceptionally demanding premarket review. Products must receive authorisation before they can legally be marketed, and separate evidence is required before a manufacturer may make a modified-risk claim.
The FDA can impose marketing conditions, require post-market surveillance and withdraw an order if later evidence shows that the product no longer benefits public health.
Its approach nevertheless accepts that consumers should be told when credible evidence shows that completely switching from one product to another reduces disease risk.
The Commission’s current approach places greater emphasis on reducing the overall attractiveness and consumption of tobacco-related and nicotine products. Its taxation proposal explicitly presents nicotine pouches as products that can prolong addiction or act as substitutes for cigarettes, especially among young people.
The EU could impose age controls, marketing restrictions, ingredient standards and proportionate nicotine limits while still recognising that adult smokers may benefit from switching completely away from cigarettes.
It could also prohibit unsubstantiated commercial claims while creating an evidence-based process through which manufacturers could apply for permission to communicate verified differences in risk.
The alternative would be to impose increasingly similar taxation, warnings and advertising rules on products with significantly different health consequences.
The EC ran a public consultation on revisions to both the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) and the Tobacco Advertising Directive (TAD) from 22 May to 14 August this year. The consultation, is intended to inform a revision of the legislative framework planned before the end of 2026.
It creates an opportunity to consider evidence that was not available when the current Tobacco Products Directive was adopted in 2014.
Nicotine pouches were then a marginal product. They now represent a rapidly expanding category, and national governments are adopting increasingly divergent responses.
The FDA decision does not compel Europe to follow the US model. The EU has different legal structures, public-health priorities and attitudes towards commercial nicotine.
One of the world’s most influential public-health authorities has concluded that there is sufficient evidence to tell adult smokers that completely switching to specified nicotine pouches reduces their risk of mouth cancer, heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, emphysema and chronic bronchitis.
That finding sits uneasily with any policy or public communication suggesting that cigarettes and smoke-free nicotine products are essentially equivalent.
The issue is particularly relevant to the Commission’s tax proposal. Taxation affects consumer behaviour partly by changing the relative prices of products. If pouches are taxed so heavily that the economic advantage over cigarettes is substantially reduced, smokers may have less incentive to switch.
Conversely, setting taxes too low could increase affordability and use among young people who have never smoked.
The task for EU legislators is therefore not simply to choose between regulation and deregulation. It is to develop a framework that calibrates restrictions, taxation and consumer information according to evidence about risk, behaviour and population-level effects.
While Washington is recognising that adults deserve accurate information about lower-risk alternatives, Brussels is looking for ways to restrict, tax or ban them.
Meanwhile, the EU is failing to control illegal disposable vapes, banned flavours, excessive nicotine levels and unauthorised devices moving through black-market channels. Regulated products are demonised, while illegal and unregulated products keep reaching consumers, including young people.
The forthcoming EU debate will test whether Brussels can reconcile its tobacco-free objective with the potential role of lower-risk alternatives.
The FDA decision makes three points that are likely to shape that discussion.
First, nicotine pouches are not harmless and should not be promoted to children or people who do not use nicotine.
Second, the absence of combustion means that their risks can differ substantially from those associated with cigarettes.
Third, the greatest potential benefit arises when smokers switch completely rather than using pouches alongside continued smoking.
The Commission is right to address gaps in the existing legislation and fragmentation between member states. Common product standards, youth protections and enforcement rules may be necessary for the Single Market to function properly.
But regulation that fails to acknowledge relative risk could also have unintended consequences.
Clive Bates and other harm-reduction advocates argue that treating all nicotine products as though they are similarly dangerous can preserve smoking by discouraging consumers from moving to safer alternatives. European health campaigners respond that the growth of commercially marketed nicotine products could create a new generation of dependent users.
As the EC completes its consultation and develops its legislative proposal, the American decision gives European policymakers a concrete case study rather than a theoretical argument.
The question is no longer whether a regulator could authorise a carefully limited reduced-risk claim for a nicotine pouch. The FDA has now done so.
The question for Europe is whether its forthcoming legislation will allow comparable scientific evidence to influence regulation, taxation and communication — or whether nicotine pouches will be treated principally as another product to be restricted, irrespective of their potential role in moving smokers away from cigarettes.
China carries a major share of the global lung cancer burden.
The post Lung cancer deaths in China to reach 760,000 by 2030 appeared first on BOL News.
Drugs such as morphine and fentanyl act on opioid receptors throughout the body and central nervous system.
The post Scientists find brain switch that could help turn off chronic pain appeared first on BOL News.
Mounjaro was first approved by the FDA in 2022 for improving blood sugar control in adults with type 2 diabetes.
The post FDA approves Mounjaro to protect high-risk diabetes patients from heart risks appeared first on BOL News.
Pakistan Medical Association warns that the health facilities in Sindh remain equally susceptible to similar tragedies.
The post Sindh orders safety reviews of health facilities after PIMS tragedy appeared first on BOL News.
The government said the financial assistance could not compensate for the loss of human life.
The post Govt announces Rs5m compensation for families of PIMS fire victims appeared first on BOL News.
New law creates studies through pilot programs to find solutions for involuntary commitment in NC that balance hospital and jail concerns.
Rethinking involuntary commitment in NC while trying not to break the system is a story from Carolina Public Press, an award-winning independent newsroom. Our breakthrough journalism shines a light on the critical overlooked and under-reported issues facing North Carolina’s more than 11 million residents. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.
Christian churches during the COVID Scamdemic.
by Brian Shilhavy
In John chapter 9 we have the incredible story of how Jesus healed a man born blind, and gave him eyesight for the first time in his life. It is a story that was not recorded in the other three historical records of the life of Jesus in the New Testament portion of the Bible.
It is helpful, however, to understand the context of this story, and why John probably included it in his own historical record of the life of Jesus Christ.
In the previous chapter, John chapter 8, Jesus clearly divided the Jewish believers of his day into two categories: those who truly knew God, whom Jesus always referred to as his “Father”, and therefore believed in and loved Jesus.
The other category of Jewish believers were those who religiously followed the Law of Moses and other Old Testament writings, but did not know Jesus’s Father, and therefore rejected everything Jesus taught, because it threatened their power base and position in Israel.
To these Jews, Jesus stated that their father was “the devil.”
Jesus stated a very important principle about “language” and understanding between these two groups, especially when it came to the truth.
Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! (John 8:43-45)
When someone has believed something as true their whole lives, which in fact is not true, it becomes very difficult for them to change their minds and admit that what they held as true for so long is, in fact, not true, because it could have devastating consequences.
It is much easier to accuse the person who is speaking the truth as the one who is lying, than to accept a truth that could totally disrupt your life.
This was the situation with the Jewish believers during Jesus’s day.
For example, the Law of Moses had very specific ways of dealing with illnesses, and only a priest could declare someone “clean” or “well.”
So when Jesus appeared on the scene, who was not from the tribe of Levi whom the Levitical priests derived their authority from, and then started healing people outside of their system, it was a direct threat to their authority, and control over the people.
What John then does in chapter 9, is illustrate this truth with the story of the man born blind.
As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth.
His disciples asked him,
“Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
“Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life.
As long as it is day, we must do the work of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work.
While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”
(John 9:1-5)
The first thing Jesus does in this story is dispel a common myth believed in the Jewish religion at that time, that people born with disabilities must have been a result of someone’s sin.
Jesus also referred to himself as “the light of the world.”
Light chases away the darkness, so that things done in darkness can be plainly seen in the light, and therefore people can see the facts, or the truth, that the light exposes once the darkness is overcome.
Now, on to the miracle.
Having said this, he spit on the ground, made some mud with the saliva, and put it on the man’s eyes.
“Go,” he told him, “wash in the Pool of Siloam” (this word means Sent).
So the man went and washed, and came home seeing. (John 9:6-7)
This was a unique miracle. Many of the miracles of healing that Jesus performed were done through speaking, or sometimes laying his hands on people.
In this one, he spit into the dirt to make “mud.”
This reminds us that according to the writings of Moses, specifically in the first book of the Bible, Genesis, that God formed man from the “dust/dirt of the earth.”
The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. (Genesis 2:7)
There must have been some physical difficulties with this man’s eyes where the components we need in the physical realm to see were missing in him, since birth. Jesus apparently supplied whatever was missing that prevented him from seeing, by using dirt mixed with his own saliva.
This unnamed man recorded in John chapter 9 simply followed Jesus’s instructions, and began to have sight for the first time in his life!
Wouldn’t this be wonderful news for everyone who would learn about this?
No. This man’s simple act of obedience to Jesus that resulted in him receiving his sight for the first time in his life, defied the medical authorities of his day, who then began to treat him as a criminal, and then excommunicated him from the religious community for daring to defy the religious authorities.
Healing was not supposed to happen this way!! If the common people could get direct healing from Jesus themselves, what use was the current healthcare system currently in place, that was dependent upon religious and medical authorities?
Let’s look at the people’s reaction to this miraculous event.
His neighbors and those who had formerly seen him begging asked,
“Isn’t this the same man who used to sit and beg?”
Some claimed that he was. Others said,
“No, he only looks like him.”
But he himself insisted,
“I am the man.”
“How then were your eyes opened?” they demanded.
He replied,
“The man they call Jesus made some mud and put it on my eyes. He told me to go to Siloam and wash. So I went and washed, and then I could see.”
“Where is this man?” they asked him.
“I don’t know,” he said.
They brought to the Pharisees the man who had been blind. (John 9:8-13)
Notice how his neighbors and friends began a debate about whether or not this man had been born blind.
Even when he spoke up for himself to declare he was the same man, they could not understand his language, just as Jesus had said in chapter 8, because the truth did not conform to their own understanding of a world run by Satan.
So they brought him to the Pharisees, the authorities of the day, which would be the equivalent of reporting someone to the police/sheriff/ICE, etc. today.
Let’s see how the religious and health authorities of that day dealt with the fact that a man born blind could now see.
Now the day on which Jesus had made the mud and opened the man’s eyes was a Sabbath.
Therefore the Pharisees also asked him how he had received his sight.
“He put mud on my eyes,” the man replied, “and I washed, and now I see.”
Some of the Pharisees said,
“This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.”
But others asked,
“How can a sinner do such miraculous signs?” So they were divided.
(John 9:14-16)
Notice how, just like this man’s neighbors and friends, the religious and health authorities could not understand what this man was saying about his own experience.
It didn’t make any sense to them.
Their “logic” went something like this: Someone who breaks the Sabbath (according to their interpretations/opinions about how one keeps the Sabbath) is a sinner. Therefore, this man could not have been healed by a sinner.
So they questioned him again in their dazed and confused state, and this time ordered that his parents also appear before their judicial review.
Finally they turned again to the blind man,
“What have you to say about him? It was your eyes he opened.”
The man replied,
“He is a prophet.”
The Jews still did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they sent for the man’s parents.
“Is this your son?” they asked.
“Is this the one you say was born blind? How is it that now he can see?”
“We know he is our son,” the parents answered, “and we know he was born blind. But how he can see now, or who opened his eyes, we don’t know. Ask him. He is of age; he will speak for himself.”
His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jews, for already the Jews had decided that anyone who acknowledged that Jesus was the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue.
That was why his parents said, “He is of age; ask him.” (John 9:17-23)
Imagine what this poor man was going through, simply because Jesus healed him! He was being treated as a criminal!
His own parents abandoned him, because they did not want to get kicked out of their church/synagogue.
They feared the religious and health authorities so much that they abandoned their son and let him fend for himself. And their fears were confirmed, because their son was excommunicated from the church, for daring to the tell the truth.
Whatever social and medical benefits he might have been receiving by being a member of the Jewish religious community, he now lost.
But receiving his sight obviously held some value for him, so he dared to speak up and confront the hypocrisy of the religious and health authorities, and was then punished for it.
A second time they summoned the man who had been blind.
“Give glory to God,” they said.
“We know this man is a sinner.”
He replied,
“Whether he is a sinner or not, I don’t know. One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!”
Then they asked him,
“What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?”
He answered,
“I have told you already and you did not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you want to become his disciples, too?”
Then they hurled insults at him and said,
“You are this fellow’s disciple! We are disciples of Moses! We know that God spoke to Moses, but as for this fellow, we don’t even know where he comes from.”
The man answered,
“Now that is remarkable! You don’t know where he comes from, yet he opened my eyes. We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly man who does his will. Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind.
If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.”
To this they replied,
“You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!”
And they threw him out (of the synagogue). (John 9:24-34)
The man who had an encounter with Jesus that resulted in him receiving his eye sight, was declared GUILTY of sinning, and excommunicated from the church.
Are things any different today?
No, they are not.
The times and the names of the religious and medical authorities have changed, but people who encounter Jesus and receive healing from him directly are still being kicked out of the religious communities.
We all witnessed it during the COVID Scam. Church members all across the world were told to put a face mask on, practice social distancing, and get Trump’s COVID-19 “vaccine” to comply with the Operation Warp Speed military campaign.
If you didn’t comply with these edicts, you could not be part of the religious community anymore.
Nothing has changed. The churches, synagogues, and pretty much every other kind of religious organization serve Satan’s world system, and if you dare to not comply, you will be excommunicated, and possibly even thrown in jail.
The medical system today is a disease management system that does not bring true healing, which is only available through Jesus Christ. They speak the language of Satan, not Jesus, because to do so would put them out of business.
The medical doctors today practicing pharmakeia, which is the Greek word used in the Bible that is typically translated with English words such as “witchcraft” or “sorcery”, are the new “priests” of today.
The medical system is the largest business in the word, and they will attack anyone who does not bow down and worship them.
To learn more about the Satanic roots to the modern medical system, please see:
Related:
Comment on this article at Created4Health.org.
This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)
See Also:
Having problems receiving our emails? See:
If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.
If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.
The post When Believing in Jesus Christ Gets You Kicked Out of the Church first appeared on Health Impact News.
The Belgian federal government has nominated Hans Kluge (pictured) for the position of Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO).
“I am very honoured by the trust Belgium has placed in me and am grateful for the opportunity to take on this important responsibility,” Kluge said on X. “Serving the WHO has been the greatest privilege of my professional life.”
Kluge has served as WHO Regional Director for Europe since 2020 and began a second term in February 2025. Under WHO rules, he will step aside as WHO/Europe Director while campaigning for the role, a process that involves lobbying member states, NGOs and the organisation's largest funders.
Tried and tested
After qualifying as a doctor in Belgium, he began his international career with Médecins Sans Frontières in conflict settings in Liberia and Somalia. He subsequently coordinated tuberculosis programmes in Siberian prisons and across the former Soviet Union.
Kluge joined WHO in 1999, initially working on tuberculosis and HIV in...
Login