The Greens have been branded the UK's first openly antisemitic party after members voted for a 'Zionism is Racism' motion calling for a single Palestinian state and the abolition of Israel.
The Bishop of Leeds is urging Catholics to 'live simply' to protect the planet. But why are bishops banging on about climate change when they're supposed to be saving souls? asks Roger Watson.
From Clause 4 to Covid lockdowns, Brexit to student fees – every major party has betrayed its own voters. The solution? As the old music-hall song puts it: dance with the one that brung you.
From 'birthing persons' to 'white tears' and 'zero tolerance', woke jargon is baffling by design. In the Mail, Andrew Doyle offers an A to Z guide to decoding the language of wokeness.
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the 'climate emergency', public health 'crises' and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The BBC has finally accepted that it should not have predetermined Nigel Farage's guilt by referring to his "failure" to declare donations. But, preposterously, it still claimed there was "no intent of bias".
Anti-Ulez activist Kevin Rees, who blew up a camera enforcing London’s ultra-low emission zone scheme with a home-made bomb, has been jailed for 15 years.
Ann Widdecombe's alleged murderer, Joshua Kerry, has been charged with preparing acts of terrorism against Nigel Farage after "intensive" police investigation.
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the 'climate emergency', public health 'crises' and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
Andy Burnham plans to pass a law scrapping the triple lock before the next election despite Labour pledging in its 2024 manifesto to keep it intact and the PM himself previously saying it would stay until 2030.
Zack Polanski has repeatedly said that his family "fled the Nazis", but it's now emerged that all four of his grandparents were born in Britain, long before the war.
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the 'climate emergency', public health 'crises' and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The Casa das Beiras of Toronto concluded last Saturday its 2026 Beirã Cultural Week (Semana Cultural Beirã), which returned this year following a seven-year hiatus. The initiative celebrated the culture and traditions of the Beiras region through music, folklore, and gastronomy.
Fado returned to the programming, this time integrated into the International Fado Festival, which brought invited fado singers from Portugal and an artist connected to the Portuguese community in Canada to Toronto.
Casa das Beiras welcomed João Brito, Francisco Moreira, Cláudia Leal, and José Geadas for a session marked by music and the celebration of Portuguese culture.
For Bernardino Nascimento, president of Casa das Beiras, the public turnout was a source of pride and demonstrated the importance of continuing to promote these initiatives.
“It is a point of pride to see this house full and to be part of the International Fado Festival. It is a way to keep our traditions and the connection to our roots alive.”
The importance of collaboration between Portuguese organizations was also highlighted by José Eustáquio, president of ACAPO, one of the entities involved in organizing the International Fado Festival. “Fado represents a great deal to Portuguese people and deserves the support of our organizations. It is important that we work together to keep this culture alive.”
Among the guests were also José Manuel Pereira, president of the Lardosa Parish Council (Junta de Freguesia), and Miguel Pipa, city councillor from the Viseu Municipal Council, who traveled from Portugal to participate in the celebrations.
For José Manuel Pereira, the visit allowed him to see firsthand the strength of the Portuguese presence in Toronto: “It is my first time in Toronto, and it was a great surprise to find so many Portuguese people gathered here. It is a source of pride to take this feeling back to Portugal. Casa das Beiras creates an important link between Viseu and Toronto and helps keep our memories and traditions alive.”
Miguel Pipa likewise emphasized the significance of finding a community so far from Portugal that remains so close to its homeland: “It is very special to see this piece of Portugal so far from our land. Even outside Portugal, Portuguese people remain connected to their roots.”
With a full house, the lights dimmed, and the voices of the fado singers, accompanied by the Portuguese guitar, filled the space. For the artists visiting from Portugal, performing in Toronto was experienced with happiness and pride—an opportunity to represent their country and share their culture.
João Brito, co-organizer of the International Fado Festival, expressed satisfaction with the turnout: “I am thrilled with the full house. Now it’s time to sing and present this wonderful audience with a great show.” Regarding the participation of the fado singers from Portugal, he added: “We wanted to give priority to the fado singers who traveled from Portugal and showcase their work to our community.”
The fado singers delivered varied performances before an attentive and engaged audience, in an atmosphere that once again demonstrated the enduring power of fado among Portuguese communities abroad.
The International Fado Festival continues on Saturday, October 3, at the Portuguese Cultural Centre of Mississauga, featuring Lenita Gentil, Natalino de Jesus, and Suzy Silva.
On October 10, it will be Casa do Alentejo’s turn to host Maura Airez, José Geadas, Francisco Moreira, and Guida Figueira.
The programming continues to bring fado to various spaces within the Portuguese community across Toronto and the surrounding region, uniting artists from Portugal and Canada to celebrate one of the most defining expressions of Portuguese culture.
Em pé – Carina Paradela e Nancy Viana Sentados – Elisa Nicolau, César Fernandes, Aurianne Fazendeiro e Ana Costa. (FPCCC)
In 2019, the First Portuguese Canadian Cultural Centre, the oldest Portuguese club in Ontario, came close to closing its doors. The math simply didn’t add up, and the board had the courage to state it publicly: without help, the First would not survive. Leading that difficult decision were Aurianne Fazendeiro and Carina Paradela, who had joined the board shortly before. What followed was a pandemic, painful cuts, and a long process of financial reorganization. Seven years later, the First celebrates 70 years in a stable financial position, with a Senior Daycare Centre at the heart of its mission, the Portuguese school still open, and a clear dream: owning their own home. Today, Aurianne serves as General Director and Carina as Director of Operations at the First, and both truly champion the future of this institution, which they consider their second home. In this conversation with Milénio, they look back at the storm, speak about the present, and appeal to the community so that, together, they can build the next 70 years.
Milénio Stadium: A few years ago, the First Portuguese was close to closing its doors. How did you realize the gravity of the situation, and what led you to say “we are not going to let this happen”?
Carina Paradela e Aurianne Fazendeiro (FPCCC)
Aurianne Fazendeiro: When we joined the board in October 2018, we were new to managing an organization of the First’s scale, and initially, we believed the financial situation was more stable than it actually was. Shortly after, we began to realize that expenses outweighed revenues and that there were insufficient funds to continue operating in that manner. In 2019, after seriously analyzing the situation, we reached the point of announcing to the community that without immediate help, the First would have to close. It was a very difficult decision, but we didn’t want to hide reality. We had to tell people clearly: this is the situation, and we need help to keep going.
Carina Paradela: And it’s important to clarify that we aren’t talking about a lack of hard work or dedication from previous boards. For many years, the First was managed essentially by volunteers—people who gave their time and did the best they could to keep this institution alive. We have immense respect for that. What we realized was that an organization of this size required more permanent, structured financial and operational management. At the time we announced we might have to close, a financial solution to resolve the issue didn’t emerge. However, a community organization offered to store the First’s assets while we decided what to do, and we are deeply grateful for that. And, curiously, about six months later, the pandemic hit.
MS: What were the hardest moments of that period? Was there ever a time you thought it wouldn’t be possible to save the club?
AF: Without a doubt. When we announced that we might close, we were genuinely preparing for that possibility. It wasn’t a threat; it was a financial reality. Then the pandemic arrived, and initially, everything became even more uncertain. We had to shut down activities and significantly reduce services and staff. But in a way, the pandemic ultimately gave us time to reorganize house. We gradually resumed activities and were able to benefit from some government support programs, particularly rent-related subsidies.
CP: And that was when we began making a huge turnaround. It wasn’t something that happened overnight. It was a process of reorganization, cutting back where necessary, gaining better control over expenses, and understanding exactly what we could sustain.
AF: Financial management became an absolute priority.
MS: Which decisions were decisive in turning things around? And who stood by your side: members, volunteers, the community, sponsors?
CP: The most important change was undoubtedly the way we began managing the organization’s finances. Aurianne played a fundamental role in that financial reorganization. We started tracking revenues and expenses much more rigorously and making decisions based on what the institution could truly afford.
AF: We also learned to work with what we have, rather than taking on commitments we couldn’t sustain. After the pandemic, we managed to secure support streams that are vital to the First’s survival today, notably through OLG Charitable Gaming and Second Harvest, which allows us to significantly reduce food costs for our Senior Daycare Centre. But we want to be honest: when we were on the brink of closure, there wasn’t a grand community campaign that saved us; the recovery was primarily the result of our internal reorganization and the opportunities that arose during and after the pandemic.
MS: How is the First Portuguese doing today? What has changed in how the club is managed and in its relationship with members and the community?
AF: Today, the First is in a much more stable financial position. We have a small team, but we have a wonderful executive board that gave us the opportunity to remain connected to the institution in a different capacity. Today, we are employees of the First, which allows us to dedicate our daily work to the organization, maintenance, and operation of the house.
CP: The division of responsibilities is also much clearer. Day-to-day management is on us; major decisions and governance rest with the board. This allows us to do what we do best: be here every day, oversee the programs, resolve issues, talk to members, and ensure everything runs smoothly.
MS: Which activities are bringing the most people to the club today? Are the Portuguese school, senior care, and summer camps still the heart of the house?
CP: Today, our main focus is the Senior Daycare Centre. As a registered charitable organization, we want the social care aspect to be truly at the core of what we do. We have many Portuguese seniors who need companionship, activities, and often simply a place where they can speak Portuguese and be around others. The centre is a vital part of the mission we want to keep building.
AF: The Portuguese school is another source of great pride for us. It’s a tradition dating back virtually to the First’s earliest years that we are delighted to preserve. It’s a direct link to our history and to passing down the language and culture to new generations. And the Summer Camp plays a very important role as well: besides serving community families and children, it generates revenue that allows us to continue funding the First’s overall mission.
MS: Aurianne and Carina, you lead an institution with 70 years of history. Does the responsibility of being at the helm of Ontario’s oldest Portuguese club weigh on your day-to-day lives?
AF: The history weighs on us. And it weighs quite heavily. Not just because it’s 70 years of history, but because we are talking about an institution that helped build the Portuguese community in Canada and spans several generations.
CP: And there is another aspect of that responsibility that, unfortunately, we feel too. The name and history of an institution this old come with things that happened before we were part of the First—some even before I was born. And at times, we feel that this influences the support or responses we receive when seeking help. We cannot change the past. We can only do our work, every single day, and build what we want the future of the First to be.
AF: But despite that weight, the First has been a true blessing for us. It’s a home that entered our lives and brought us friendships, people, experiences, and an even stronger connection to our Portuguese heritage.
CP: It is our second home. And we are eternally grateful for that.
MS: How would you like to see the First Portuguese 10 years from now?
CP: We want to see the First with a home of its own. That is our ultimate goal. And that is what we work for every single day. We already have some money set aside specifically for that purpose, and little by little, we continue to grow that fund.
AF: Our dream is to achieve it in less than ten years. Maybe in five. But that will also depend on the community. If there are people and businesses willing to help, we can get there much faster. We want a place of our own, where we can secure the future of the Senior Centre and offer our seniors a better, more stable home tailored to their needs.
MS: On this milestone anniversary, what message do you leave for the community and for those who helped keep the club standing?
CP: Our message is, above all, one of gratitude to everyone who continues to believe in the First and support us. But it is also an appeal. Please help us build a home where our seniors can continue to have a dignified place to be, where our children can learn Portuguese, and where future generations can maintain a connection to our culture.
AF: We are deeply grateful to those who support us, who believe in us, and who keep walking through this door. And our door is open to everyone who wants the best for the First. We cannot change the past. But we can decide what we want to build for the next 70 years. And that is what we want to do: look forward.
Olivia Chow, Brad Bradford and Chris Alexander. CBC
As sondagens tornaram-se parte integrante da política moderna. Antes de uma eleição ser decidida pelos eleitores, é-nos frequentemente dito quem está à frente, quem está a ganhar terreno e quem pode estar a ficar para trás. Mas permanece uma questão importante… até que ponto devíamos levar as sondagens a sério?
Com a aproximação da atual eleição em Toronto, várias sondagens recentes têm mostrado a Presidente da Câmara (Mayor), Olivia Chow, à frente do seu principal opositor, Brad Bradford. Um estudo da Liaison Strategies divulgado a 30 de setembro colocava Chow com 48% entre os eleitores decididos e inclinados, em comparação com 39% para Bradford e 10% para Chris Alexander. A mesma sondagem revelou que 15% de todos os inquiridos permaneciam indecisos.
Uma sondagem da Ipsos divulgada a 23 de setembro também mostrava Chow à frente, embora com uma margem diferente. A Ipsos reportou uma vantagem de 15 pontos e indicou que aproximadamente um quarto dos eleitores prováveis permanecia indeciso. Depois, houve uma sondagem da Canada Pulse Insights, noticiada pela CITYNews, que mostrava um cenário consideravelmente diferente consoante a amostra incluía todos os eleitores ou apenas aqueles que já tinham decidido o seu voto. Entre os eleitores decididos, Chow registava 51% e Bradford 34%, mas entre o total de inquiridos os números eram de 38% e 25%, respetivamente, com 20% de indecisos.
Afinal, em que números devemos acreditar?
O que é exatamente uma sondagem?
Uma sondagem é uma tentativa de medir as opiniões ou intenções de uma população muito maior, fazendo perguntas a uma amostra menor de pessoas. Em vez de perguntar a cada residente de Toronto em quem pretende votar, uma empresa de sondagens pode inquirir cerca de 1.000 pessoas e utilizar métodos estatísticos para estimar a visão da população em geral. Uma sondagem devidamente concetualizada tenta fazer com que a sua amostra se assemelhe à população que está a tentar medir. Os especialistas em sondagens podem ter em conta fatores como idade, geografia, género e outras características demográficas. Mas existe uma distinção importante entre um estudo científico e um inquérito informal na internet. Uma sondagem que simplesmente pede aos visitantes de um site para clicarem no seu candidato preferido não representa necessariamente os eleitores de Toronto. A realização de sondagens profissionais exige uma metodologia definida, uma amostra adequada e procedimentos para lidar com erros de amostragem e de não-amostragem.
Pode confiar nos números?
Pode utilizar as sondagens como informação — mas deve ter cuidado em não as tratar como previsões. Os especialistas em sondagens distinguem o erro de amostragem de outras potenciais fontes de erro, incluindo pessoas que não respondem, grupos que ficam de fora do processo de amostragem e inquiridos que interpretam mal as perguntas ou dão uma resposta que não reflete com precisão o seu comportamento final. Por outras palavras, uma margem de mais ou menos três pontos não significa que uma sondagem só possa estar errada em três pontos. Há também outro grande problema com as sondagens eleitorais… as pessoas podem mudar de ideias. Alguém que diz hoje que vai votar num determinado candidato pode votar de forma diferente várias semanas mais tarde. Alguém que está indeciso pode eventualmente tornar-se um apoiante muito convicto de um candidato em particular. E, talvez o mais importante, dizer que vai votar não é o mesmo que ir realmente votar.
Existem benefícios significativos nas sondagens. Primeiro, as sondagens podem dizer-nos o que os eleitores estão a pensar num determinado momento. Podem identificar quais os temas que importam para o eleitorado e se a opinião pública está a mudar. Segundo, podem dar às campanhas, aos jornalistas e ao público uma perceção do cenário competitivo. Terceiro, múltiplas sondagens independentes podem por vezes oferecer uma imagem mais ampla do que qualquer inquérito isolado. Se vários estudos realizados de forma profissional apontam numa direção semelhante, isso pode ser mais informativo do que um único resultado isolado. As sondagens também podem revelar algo que os resultados eleitorais só revelam depois de os votos serem contados… a razão pela qual as pessoas pensam da forma que pensam.
O maior perigo é as pessoas começarem a tratar as sondagens como factos consumados. Uma sondagem pode tornar-se uma manchete… dependendo de quem está a tentar lançar uma mensagem ou definir uma narrativa. As sondagens também podem criar um impulso perigoso: quando os eleitores ouvem dizer que um candidato está à frente, alguns podem assumir que a eleição já está decidida. Outros podem sentir-se motivados a votar precisamente por acreditarem que o seu candidato preferido está em desvantagem. Isto pode criar o que por vezes se chama “efeito de adesão” (bandwagon effect) ou, na direção oposta, um “efeito de mobilização”.
Em Toronto, as sondagens recentes têm mostrado um número significativo de pessoas que ainda não decidiram o seu voto. Isso significa que os números de hoje podem ser muito diferentes do boletim de voto final. O que devemos procurar ao ler uma sondagem? Em vez de perguntar simplesmente “quem está à frente?”, os eleitores deveriam fazer várias outras perguntas: Quem realizou a sondagem? Quantas pessoas foram inquiridas? Quando foram inquiridas? A pergunta foi feita sobre a totalidade dos eleitores, eleitores prováveis, eleitores decididos ou eleitores decididos e inclinados? Estas questões podem mudar completamente a forma como uma sondagem deve ser interpretada.
A única sondagem que no fundo importa é aquela que é realizada no dia da eleição — quando os eleitores depositam efetivamente o seu voto. Até lá, cada sondagem é uma fotografia da corrida num determinado momento. Algumas fotografias podem ser mais nítidas do que outras. Mas nenhuma delas é a eleição em si.
No final de contas, as sondagens são úteis, mas não são uma profecia. Podem dizer-nos onde a opinião pública parece estar hoje, mas não nos podem dizer com certeza o que os eleitores farão amanhã.
Até lá, as sondagens são apenas um retrato instantâneo — e a imagem ainda pode mudar. Encare-as como informação — não como um facto.
As sondagens podem moldar a conversa, mas não depositam um único voto na urna. Quando as urnas fecham, os únicos números que contam são aqueles que os eleitores colocam no boletim de voto.
Vincent Black/MS
O conteúdo do website do Milénio Stadium é traduzido automaticamente pelo Google Translate.
When the Saturnia docked in Halifax in 1953, it brought aboard the first Portuguese immigrants to arrive legally in Canada. They were mostly men, alone, with contracts to work in agriculture and on the railways. Three years later, in 1956, some of those pioneers founded the First Portuguese Canadian Club in Toronto, the city’s first Portuguese club. For decades, it was there that newcomers found friends, jobs, housing, and a piece of Portugal where their language was spoken.
Seventy years later, the community has transformed. It has grown, moved to other areas of the city or even other municipalities in the Greater Toronto Area or Ontario, and now has children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren born in Canada. Throughout its 70 years of existence, the First went through periods of glory, crises, and moved locations more than once. But its doors remain open.
To understand the role the club played in building the Portuguese community, promoting its culture, and teaching the language, and to ponder what the future holds for it, we spoke with Prof. José Carlos Teixeira, a researcher who has spent decades studying the Portuguese presence in Canada and knows the Greater Toronto Area community like few others. It is a conversation about memory, identity, and the transformations of Luso-Canadians who formed what sociologists call an «institutionally complete» community.
Milénio Stadium: The First Portuguese Canadian Club was born in 1956, just three years after the arrival of the Saturnia in Halifax with the first legal Portuguese immigrants. What led those pioneers, newly arrived and still with so little, to feel the need to create a club so early on? What role did the First play during those initial years of adaptation to a new country?
José Carlos Teixeira: To understand the First, one must place it in its historical context. We, the Portuguese community, are a relatively young group in Canada. In the 1950s, only a few thousand Portuguese arrived (around 17,000), mostly men with employment contracts for agriculture and railway construction, and the majority settled in Ontario. In 1956, the First Portuguese was born in Toronto. That same year, the Portuguese Association of Canada was established in Montreal. Throughout the 1950s, these were the only two Portuguese associations in the entire country, and we are fortunate to still have them with us.
In Toronto, the first Portuguese people settled in the Kensington Market and Alexandra Park area—a working-class neighborhood that had previously been home to Jewish, Italian, Polish, and Ukrainian immigrants. It was close to jobs in the downtown core and had that market, which was then known as the Jewish market. In the 1950s, the men rented rooms; in the 1960s, families began to arrive and rent entire houses. That was the embryo of the Portuguese community. It is no coincidence that the first Portuguese business was a restaurant on Nassau Street, owned by Mr. Sousa, a pioneer who arrived in 1953, whom I had the good fortune to interview more than once and whose conversations I still religiously keep on old cassette tapes. People talk a lot about Augusta, but it was on Nassau Street that the Portuguese community’s very first commercial establishment actually appeared. And it was in that same context, in a Toronto that was already multicultural, that the first headquarters of the First Portuguese Canadian Club also appeared on Nassau Street (Nassau and Lippincott).
What was its role? Beyond being a gathering place, it was a spot where people felt at home. Portuguese was spoken, it smelled of Portuguese culture and our food, and there were cultural activities, sports, and language instruction. People went there because their friends and relatives were there. And we often forget another component: it was at the First that people obtained references to rent a house or an apartment, and it was there that they found work. How many people met someone at the First and, through Portuguese bosses, secured a job! With its multiple activities and services, the First helped many of our people, especially from the first generation, integrate into the host society without having to abandon their roots.
MS: Over these seven decades, how has the First Portuguese contributed to organizing and bringing cohesion to the Portuguese community in Toronto? And how did the club follow the community’s own evolving geography—from the Kensington area and Little Portugal to the relocation of so many families to the suburbs?
JCT: In the 1950s, 60s, 70s, and into the early 80s, the First was the anchor of the community. I would even say, in good English, that «the First was the heart and soul of the Portuguese community». For a long time, there were very few Portuguese clubs besides the First. Let’s look at the timeline: in the 1960s, Casa da Madeira (1963) and Casa do Benfica (1968) emerged; in the 1970s, only a few more were founded, such as Amor da Pátria (1971), Asas do Atlântico (1973), the Portuguese Cultural Centre of Mississauga (1974), and Associação Cultural do Minho (1977). Therefore, between the 1950s and the late 1970s, there were only 7 clubs and associations. It was only from the 1980s onward that we witnessed significant growth in the community organizational movement, with the creation of 10 more clubs/associations. In other words, over the years, we built what sociologists call an «institutionally complete» community. In downtown Toronto, in our Little Portugal, we built an ethnic neighborhood and an economic enclave with a strong, highly visible identity—featuring sociocultural and religious associations, businesses, and media outlets. And the First appeared at the key moment, during the embryonic stage of that construction.
There is another aspect we cannot forget: the standing that the First had with different levels of government. It was a mandatory stop for Canadian politicians during election campaigns and beyond, who went there to present themselves to the community, as well as for Portuguese dignitaries. Politicians respected the First.
Then came a natural transition phase that affected all organizations and the community itself. With the drastic decline in immigration, the First felt the impact deeply. There were leadership and financial crises, which led to the sale of the building where it had established itself in the meantime (at 722 College Street). And here I must open a parenthesis: I admire the vision of Manuel DaCosta, who purchased that magnificent building in the heart of the community. In doing so, he preserved part of our memory, our history, and our presence in Toronto. Today, that complex—which includes, beyond the former First building, Camões Square, the Portuguese Canadian Walk of Fame, and the magnificent Guardian Angel statue—continues to serve as a community anchor.
Meanwhile, the First had to navigate new paths, following the immigrant corridor along Rogers Road and Dufferin, where many Portuguese families had relocated. Today, it is located on Caledonia Road. Over the past four decades, we have witnessed pronounced residential mobility and suburbanization. Our communities transitioned from a degree of isolation to residential, social, and cultural integration. The First had to adapt to this new reality.
MS: Among the many activities that made history at this club—folklore, soccer, events, music, gastronomy…—we must talk about the First’s Portuguese school, which for generations was the place where many children and grandchildren of immigrants learned the language of their parents and grandparents. How important was this work in preserving Luso-Canadian identity?
JCT: We must highlight the pioneering and extraordinary work of the First’s school. I followed its progress for over two decades and had good friends there. If the First was the community anchor for decades, its school was an obligatory reference point. It played an extraordinary role among younger generations in teaching Portuguese, the native language of their parents and grandparents.
I know many young people who went through the First’s school and have gone very far in life. When I speak with them, they acknowledge the importance of having learned Portuguese. Knowledge takes up no space, and Portuguese is one of the most spoken languages in the world. I have no doubt that the First’s school played a crucial role in preserving our language, our culture, and our Luso-Canadian identity. A great deal is owed to it, as a pioneer in this field.
MS: On that note, what challenges does Portuguese language instruction face today in a community where new generations were born and raised in Canada?
JCT: I leave the pedagogical details to those working in education, but the numbers help illustrate the problem. According to the 2021 Census, fewer and fewer people of Portuguese origin declare Portuguese as their mother tongue. That is a fact. In Ontario, the situation is better, and in Toronto—the great heart of the community, where the pulse of our language and culture can still be felt—it is even more favorable. The few Portuguese immigrants who continue to arrive in Canada still come primarily to Toronto, which rejuvenates the clubs, associations, and Portuguese language schools. Concerns over the survival of the language apply more to other provinces and cities, where in the short term—say, ten years—the numbers will be even more concerning.
Today, about half of the Portuguese population in Canada was born here, and we are moving toward the fourth generation. With intercultural marriages, many of these young people no longer speak Portuguese, or speak very little. As their education levels rise—and statistics show clear socioeconomic mobility among the younger generations—it is natural that assimilation increases as well. Many Portuguese people feel that, in Canada, their culture is in transition. But separating them from their native culture and language would strip them of their identity.
We need more studies on the second, third, and soon, fourth generations. What do we know about them? What is their relationship with their parents’ language and culture? As in all ethnic groups, there are youth who reject their roots and others who rediscover them later on. I have seen this a lot, especially among the young people I interact with at the university: they take an interest in Portugal, their parents’ homeland, follow soccer because of Ronaldo, listen to Portuguese music, and travel there. There is a noticeable revival, a rediscovery of their roots.
MS: Many Portuguese clubs and associations today face aging memberships, difficulty in attracting younger people, and the community’s dispersion across Greater Toronto. At 70 years old, what future do you see for the First Portuguese?
JCT: I am not a pessimist, but I cannot ignore reality either. We have only been in Canada for seven decades. The first generation came to stay, and the Portuguese cultural heritage appears well-adapted and integrated into the host society. However, it is not guaranteed that the second and third generations will follow the path of their parents and grandparents, nor that they will be able to preserve the culture and traditions.
Cultural duality—or even cultural conflict—is perhaps the best way to define Luso-Canadian youth, whether of mainland, Azorean, or Madeiran descent. While for some their ethnic identity is a source of enrichment, for others it can be a source of conflict that leads them to reject their heritage. Whether they will be able to reconcile these two parts of themselves in the future remains an open question.
It is in this context that I view the First. The First had a massive historical role, but today, like all clubs and associations, it must adapt to new realities, new needs, and the sociocultural preferences of younger generations who were born in Canada and often do not speak Portuguese.
Amidst all the sentimental populist fluff, a political theory of sorts could be discerned in Andy Burnham's conference speech, says Professor James Alexander. Let's call him Our Andy-with-his-10-year-Plandy.
For decades, it was in the classrooms of the Portuguese school at the First Portuguese Canadian Cultural Centre that thousands of children of immigrants learned to read, write, and feel the language of their parents and grandparents. At its peak, it had nearly 800 students, followed the official Portuguese curriculum, and awarded diplomas recognized by the Consulate. More than just a school, it was a gathering place for families and one of the pillars of Luso-Canadian identity in Toronto. It was and still is. Today, with fewer students and classes held only on Saturdays, it continues to carry out the same mission: keeping the Portuguese language alive for future generations.
Few people know this history as well as Celina de Melo. She arrived from Terceira Island in 1971 and, for 49 years, taught Portuguese to successive generations of Luso-Canadians. In the year the First celebrates its 70th anniversary, Professor Celina recalls the packed classrooms, the celebrations, the theater plays, and the trips to Portugal with her students, while leaving a heartfelt plea to families: don’t let the language die.
Milénio Stadium: How did you start teaching at the First Portuguese’s Portuguese school?
Prof Celina de Melo (FPCCC)
Celina de Melo: I arrived here in 1971 from Terceira, and I didn’t even know there were Portuguese classes. They told me there was a school office on Nassau Street. I went there, met with Professor Ferreira, and he immediately told me: «I want Celina to start working at the First.» Since I was already a teacher, they gave me a class right away at Ryerson School, at Dundas and Bathurst, near Augusta. I was there for a long time, then we moved to College Street. Later on, I also applied to the Canadian public school system, where I taught for many years, from kindergarten to grade 8. But I never left the First’s school.
MS: What do you remember about those early days in Canada?
CM: I missed the children I had left behind in the Azores deeply. But coming to Canada was a stroke of luck, a blessing that entered my life. I was doing what I truly loved. Professor Ferreira, who is no longer with us, was very fond of me and we worked very closely together. I always loved what I did, and even today, I would still love to be teaching.
MS: How many years did you teach here?
CM: From 1971 until 2020. That’s 49 years! Besides teaching, I visited all the schools, collected tuition fees, spoke with students and parents, and handled enrollments. We reached nearly 800 students, from kindergarten to 9th grade, and later up to 11th grade. We rented classrooms in Canadian schools. Classes ran from 5:30 PM to 7:30 PM, but in the winter, it was already dark by five-thirty. So I suggested to the board that we shift the schedule to five to seven so the children could go home earlier, and that’s what we did.
MS: The students spent their days in Canadian schools and then went to learn Portuguese at the end of the day. Did they go willingly, or because their parents forced them?
CM: They went willingly! The teachers were all young and knew how to welcome the kids. There was always a half-hour snack break; we would talk, laugh, put on celebrations and plays. Teaching Portuguese isn’t just about teaching reading and writing. It’s about teaching how to share, how to live alongside others. I always told our teachers: «We are an extension of the family.» And parents, back then, adored the Portuguese school. The truth is, even today, I go grocery shopping or anywhere else and someone comes up to me: «Dona Celina, you were my teacher!» Sometimes they come with two or three children of their own. Some I recognize, others I don’t. It gives me goosebumps. It’s a profound inner pride we feel when we realize that, as teachers, we left good memories with someone.
MS: What was taught besides the language?
CM: Our culture, and beyond that… daily life, how to carry oneself, how to behave. And then there were the trips. Once, during a celebration, the President was here, and I, a bit nervously, said I wished some of these local-born students, who had never been to Portugal, could get to know the country. The following year, I took 27 students to mainland Portugal, from Porto to Lisbon, with everything paid for by the Portuguese Government. It wasn’t just good; it was wonderful! Later, since I’m from the Azores, I spoke with the Regional Government, and over the next two years, we went to Terceira, Pico, and Faial with 23 students. The parents would drop them off at the airport and say: «Dona Celina, my child is in your hands.» It was a huge responsibility. I would only go to bed when everyone else was asleep. But they were so well-behaved, absolute angels.
MS: Do you think the school helped shape the Luso-Canadian identity of those generations?
CM: Yes, without a doubt. Many students were born here and didn’t know Portugal. The school gave them that. And it was serious education: we followed the curriculum from Portugal, the school became officially recognized, inspectors came to see how we operated, and at the end of the year, students took an exam at the Consulate and received an official diploma.
MS: What advice would you give to those teaching today, when many children are already third- or fourth-generation born in Canada?
CM: Now it’s harder. The school operates only on Saturdays, with two or three classes. Unfortunately, Portuguese was removed from the public schools (integrated language program). It was only half an hour a day—little, but better than nothing. Today, grandparents still speak Portuguese with their grandchildren, but it’s different. In the past, we had meetings, events, and we could see that the school mattered to the Portuguese community. At the end of the day, parents thought: «Let’s put the kids in Portuguese classes, it’s one more language!» Sometimes I feel a bit sad. I no longer run the school, but I offer my ideas: why not open classes during the week as well? We need to support parents. It’s tiring, but when you love the profession, you make the sacrifice. I used to teach all day long and, on Wednesdays, I still had a class of nearly 30 adults. I was crazy! But you know what I’ll tell you… my Portuguese school stays with me until I die.
MS: On this 70th anniversary of the First, what message would you like to leave for former students and families?
CM: To my former students, I ask with all my love: do not let your children lose the language you learned. The more languages we know, the better. Sometimes it takes a small sacrifice to pay for school, but it’s worth it. Education and learning are deeply important for living in this huge country and in this world, where life is becoming increasingly difficult.