Governments, as Murray Rothbard reminded us, are nothing but “armed criminal bands writ large”. The Trump Administration has done all it can to prove Rothbard right.
The United States ceased being a republic 160 years ago. But its government stopped pretending to rule one much more recently. In the 20th century it became an empire. During this one, it’s been a degenerate one.
Yesterday at the UN, the current emperor personified how degraded it has become. He again threatened “annihilation” of the civilization he “Pearl Harbored” almost eight months ago:
“I have a big decision to make. Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before? Maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world. Or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again? Do I drive them into Hell with no chance of survival and no hope of future greatness or generations?”
Leaving aside his reflexive use of the word “I”, as if a president has authority to eradicate “future generations”, what “people or countries” has Iran ever destroyed?
For at least a century and a half, Iran hasn’t launched a war against any country. Nor has it instigated a coup against the U.S. government, installed its handpicked dictator, and surrounded America with Persian military bases.
Before this war, the U.S. had about twenty military installations with almost 50,000 personnel around the Middle East. This century alone, the U.S. government has lobbed more than a hundred thousand bombs and missiles on at least eight countries in that region.
It also backed the brutal Iraq war on Iran, which killed up to a quarter million Iranians. And we wonder why they’ve said mean things about Americans! After what the US government has done this year, Iranians have more reason to voice displeasure.
During the sneak attack that started this war (as opposed to the one he launched last year), Donald Trump assassinated the leadership of Iran and murdered almost two hundred school girls. We’d like to think killing the kids was an accident.
But why should we? The administration never apologized for it. Ludicrously, it tried to blame Iran, and then kept threatening that country with complete destruction.
Why would a president who threatens to “annihilate” 90 million innocent people not be willing to take out some children? He and his supporters would simply excuse themselves by blaming Iran, lamenting “collateral damage”, and shrugging that “War is Hell” (as if that weren’t a reason not to start one).
In his address yesterday, the president wasn’t even asking the UN (much less the US Congress) for a resolution allowing him to commit atrocities. He simply told them he’s mulling whether to wipe out a country whose representatives were in the room.
While most of us are numb to Trump being outrageous, how aren’t more public officials appalled by such depravity? Democrats aren’t widely denouncing him, which again reveals how indistinguishable the parties are regarding most things that matter.
This entire catastrophe is incoherent. The president who (ostensibly) waged war to keep Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons his own intelligence said it wasn’t building now hints he’d use nukes to ensure Iran doesn’t get them. This from a guy who partly justified his war as a way to rescue “the Iranian people”.
If Trump were to turn Iran into an ashtray, then what? Notwithstanding the moral enormity of such an outrage, how does making Iran a chaotic wasteland help the U.S.?
It may debilitate proxies and allies such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. But those organizations are Israel’s problem. None posed a threat to Iowa.
They became America’s concern only because the US intervened on Israel’s behalf, which provoked Houthi attacks on U.S. ships in recent years and the 1983 Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut.
Iran is home to about 40% of the 300 million Shia Muslims around the world. How will the rest of them react? Will Americans be “safer” if a bunch of aggrieved Islamists decide to get even?
Will mass destruction open a strait that wasn’t impeded before Trump unleashed this idiocy? Or will it leave the choke point controlled by hostile renegades with an insatiable vendetta, while creating regional vacuums for Israel to fill?
The U.S. president openly boasts about kidnapping and killing foreign rulers, stealing other countries’ resources, and potentially obliterating civilizations that’ve existed for thousands of years.
He bragged about looting Venezuelan oil by telling the UN (which was supposedly established to thwart such thuggery) that “to the victor goes the spoils”.
Why doesn’t this rationale work when Putin attacks the Ukraine or if China took Taiwan? Do Iranian or Venezuelan borders not have the “sanctity” of the ones Russians crossed or that China might erase?
The administration sold the Venezuela invasion as a fight against illegal immigrants and drugs. Now the president admits it was outright robbery, while lying about the value of the loot. And he’s proud of it. But few others are.
Aside from the dwindling cohort of MAGA cultists, most Americans are repulsed by what their government is doing. They never wanted more wars. Along with controlling immigration and taming inflation, ending them and avoiding new ones were among the main reasons they voted for Trump.
Yet as the administration runs roughshod, Congress sits silent. It should’ve impeached, removed, and imprisoned this president for usurping its powers. Instead, the Republican leadership called a recess till the midterms, forfeiting the last month of its worthless majority.
After starting imbecilic wars and passing boondoggle bills that make food, fuel, and housing prohibitively expensive while bragging about a ballroom and renaming bodies of water, the Republicans deserve to be ousted. [Both sides are an enemy of the people, abolish government altogether]
Among the worst consequences of their malfeasance is that it’ll return power to a party that’s uniformly awful. But such is the state of our “democracy” that cyanide and arsenic are the only options offered.
Caught on Tape: AIPAC CEO Boasted of Controlling Trump’s National Security Officials
LewRockwell.com
Paul Craig Roberts | PaulCraigRoberts.org
Elliot Brandt, the Chief Executive Officer of AIPAC–the Israel Lobby-which is privileged by not having to register as a foreign lobby was caught on tape boasting about how easy it is for him to control the President of the United States and Trump’s national security officials–National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and others.
In a stunning leaked recording, AIPAC CEO Elliot Brandt is heard openly bragging about how the powerful pro-Israel lobby manipulates key figures in Donald Trump’s national security inner circle, pushing them toward another costly and unpopular war in the Middle East on behalf of Israel.
The audio has ignited outrage online, fueling accusations that U.S. foreign policy is being dictated not by American interests, but by a foreign-aligned lobbying machine with unchecked influence. Critics say the leak is further proof that the United States is not just compromised — it is occupied.
You can listen to it here:
US Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to four-star general Colin Powell, Secretary of State in the George W. Bush regime, said:
“I watched Mossad take over the Pentagon in 2002. They did not need any identification to get through the river entrance to the building. They went upstairs to Douglas Feith, the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy—the third most powerful man in the Defense Department. Occasionally, they went to Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense.”
Both the 2nd and 3rd most powerful positions in the Pentagon were Zionist Jews supportive of Greater Israel’s hegemony over the Middle East. They were able to put America to war in the Middle East for the Zionist agenda of Greater Israel–from the Nile to the Euphrates, today from the Nile to Pakistan. 9/11 was their orchestrated “Pearl Harbor” that let them launch their “war on terror” which was in reality America’s destruction of Iraq, Libya, and Syria, which were obstacles to Israel’s expansion. At the present time the Israel Lobby has Americans at war with Iran, a war that to date has left Iran the victor.
Trump is smarting under the military defeat he brought to America. He has tried to hide it in his blustering.
Netanyahu knowing that Trump cannot accept defeat has Trump wired up to escape defeat by saving face by nuking Iran. Thus, Trump’s threat on Tuesday, September 22 before the entire world at the UN General Assembly gave Iran until after the US midterm election on November 3 to surrender or be annihilated. Annihilation of Iran requires Trump’s or Israel’s use of nuclear weapons.
What the world witnessed last Tuesday was the total controlling power of Israel over American foreign policy. The Trump regime does not serve America. It does not serve its NATO allies. It does not serve peace or justice. The Trump Regime serves Israel at the expense not only of all Americans but also all of the world.
On November 3, we will find out what percentage of Americans, if any at all, understand this.
Britain now has more illegal Channel arrivals under the Labour government, which has been in power two years, than it has soldiers in the British Army.
Almost 90 percent of those intercepted since 2018 have been male; two-thirds are aged 18 to 39
Home Office figures put small-boat arrivals since Labour took office on 4 July 2024 at 83,279. The regular Army stands at 83,000.
On Wednesday alone, 781 people came ashore — the worst single day since Andy Burnham replaced Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister in July. The first three days of the week delivered 1,085 arrivals. Across 809 days of Labour government, that works out at roughly 103 people a day.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the milestone speaks for itself. “Labour has let an entire army-sized population cross the Channel illegally,” he said. “More people have arrived in small boats than we have soldiers defending Britain. That is completely bonkers. Labour has lost control of our borders and seems utterly incapable of getting it back.”
Former Royal Navy officer Chris Parry went further. Labour’s intake, he said, amounts to six-and-a-half divisions of fighting-age men. “That’s more divisions than were in the Allied assault wave on D-Day,” he added, calling the crossings “amphibious operations against our coast.”
The comparison is worse when the rest of the services are brought in. Labour’s small-boat total already sits 15,429 ahead of the Royal Navy and RAF combined, which together field 67,850 full-time personnel. And this is only the post-election slice. Under the Conservatives, around 128,000 people arrived by dinghy. Since records began in December 2018 the running total has blown past 200,000 — higher than the combined strength of the Army, Navy and RAF.
Writing in the Mail after more than 1,200 people crossed from Monday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said: “It is utterly insane. And if it wasn’t clear before, the events of the past few days have proved beyond any reasonable doubt that both Border Force and the Home Office have completely lost control.”
He added: “Years ago, I warned the small boats crisis would define this era of British politics. Predictably, the chin-stroking commentariat declared I was exaggerating. Well, look where we are now.”
“Ordinary Britons rightly ask if successive governments cannot stop people from arriving illegally in broad daylight, let alone under cover of darkness without detection, then what exactly is the point of having a border?” Farage asked. His party wants the largest military operation in the Channel since the Second World War and a return of every illegal arrival to France.
Two boats this week reached British beaches without Border Force interception — one at Samphire Hoe between Dover and Folkestone, another near Folkestone the day before. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood ordered an “urgent review” and said even one uncontrolled landing is “one too many.” Education Secretary Lucy Powell then told GB News that “you can’t stop everything all of the time,” while insisting Mahmood was taking “swift action to find out what’s gone wrong here and make sure it doesn’t happen again.”
Border Force union official Lucy Moreton was less diplomatic. Undetected landings are “absolutely, definitely happening,” she said, with abandoned vessels and reports “all the way down to Falmouth.” “If we don’t look for it, we don’t know it’s happening. We don’t know it’s happening, we don’t have to deal with it.”
Labour’s first act in 2024 was to scrap the Rwanda deterrent. Shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie said the latest numbers follow from that choice. “We’ve got a government that is oblivious to the scale of the problem we face in the Channel,” he said. “It’s not a surprise, frankly, because the very first thing this Labour government did was get rid of any sort of deterrent to prevent illegal migrants coming into this country.”
Former Home Office borders director Glyn Williams told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “the consequences of a failing policy… are becoming more and more extreme,” and that “more extreme measures” may now have to be considered.
The official line is that crossings are down 42 percent this year and that summer 2026 was the quietest since 2020. That is the defence ministers reach for while dinghies still beach in Kent and Britain discusses paying France another billion pounds for the next small-boats deal. GB News presenter Patrick Christys called the week “full-on illegal migrant carnage.”
The people coming off those boats do not vanish. They are processed, housed and parked on the public. We have already covered what that looks like on the ground. In Piddington, Oxfordshire — 350 residents, 46 children, no shop, no pub — a Home Office paper for the old MoD depot discussed 3,510 “service users” against an official planning figure of 1,256 single adult males. Ten migrants for every local.
Similar dumps are lined up at Linton-on-Ouse, Barnham and Crowborough as hotels are emptied into former barracks.
The legal machine that then keeps them here is not a refugee system. It is a production line. A Home Office official who has handled thousands of cases put the genuine share at “at best 1 per cent.” Package stories, recycled police letters, staged nightclub photos, modern-slavery claims that cannot be disproved. Grant rates still run in the tens of thousands. Removals do not.
Who helps keep the Channel route open is another story again. NGO networks on the French coast have spent years treating the crossing as a humanitarian project rather than a breach of an island nation’s border.
Migration Watch chairman Alp Mehmet urged “Military-age men are pouring into Britain across the Channel. Illegal Channel crossings are now a major political crisis, and pose a real and present threat to our national security.”
Almost 90 percent of those intercepted since 2018 have been male; two-thirds are aged 18 to 39. People-smuggling gangs have told reporters that Iran has used the route to move operatives in return for a “favour” once on British soil. In 2023, nineteen suspected terrorists linked to Islamic State and al-Shabaab were reported to have arrived the same way.
A country that cannot stop a dinghy in daylight does not have a border policy. It has a ferry service run by criminal gangs, underwritten by hotels, lawyers and a claims system that treats refusal as the hard option.
Labour inherited a failure and then dismantled the one deterrent it had. Burnham now inherits the same beaches, the same numbers, and an actual Army smaller than the cohort that has already washed up on his party’s watch.
Beyond the killing of many of us, control of the remainder is the intention.
We are Already Fighting World War III and You are the Target
GlobalResearch.ca
Robert J. Burrowes
‘First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.’ —Martin Niemöller
[Martin Niemöller] A prominent Lutheran pastor, wrote these words after spending eight years in Nazi prisons and concentration camps from 1937-1945.
One of the most enduring beliefs held by the bulk of the human population is that wars are fought to be won.
Another is that wars are fought to ‘defend’ one or more nation-states (or other political group) against what people are told is a threat to some vital aspect of their national security, invariably including the lives of members of their own population.
A third widely-held belief is that politicians and officers directing the war strategy for your country (or group) are interested in minimizing casualties among your own population.
But as I explained briefly in a recent article – see ‘Resisting the New World Order: Your Technocratic Slave Camp’ – these and other common beliefs about wars (and many other subjects not considered here), including the political and legal infrastructure in which they are supposed to be contained, are simply delusions promoted by Elite-owned and controlled media and social media to consolidate your existing prejudices – nationalism being a key one in this context – distract you from any genuinely critical analysis that might make you question the dominant (that is, Elite) narratives and overwhelm you with an unending stream of trivia. As a result, the typical individual is left in a state of perpetual confusion: bereft of the capacity to think, feel and analyze, let alone to act powerfully in response.
But if wars are not meant to be won, why are they fought at all?
In essence, wars are fought to achieve three primary, interrelated outcomes:
1. a restructuring of world order in which any particular war is just one step in a wider, longer term program to establish Elite (now technocratic) control over the Earth, its (remaining) human population and all of its resources,
2. significant (and ultimately substantial) human depopulation (with combatants and civilians on both sides of a war, as well as third party populations, being equally expendable), and
3. greater Elite profits.
For these three outcomes to be achieved, it is vital that there are as many wars being fought as possible at any one time and that they are fought for as long as possible: ideally, they must become, in a sense, ‘perpetual’ in the way that US wars on Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan dragged on for decades and many other ‘less prominent’ wars have too.
For centuries then, one primary element in the formula for achieving these three outcomes of war has been through Elite control of governments; this is largely achieved through ensuring government indebtedness to the Elite through its ownership and control of the banking system.
And the most effective way to maintain and expand this government indebtedness is to ensure that war is perpetual. Among others, this point has been made by G. Edward Griffin in his classic work The Creature from Jekyll Island in which he carefully explained the five points of what he called ‘The Rothschild Formula’ wherein nations are ongoingly entrapped in a perpetual cycle of paying for war through debt, noting also that ‘it may be necessary to finance both sides of the conflict’. Thus, while always proclaiming the virtues of peace, ‘the unspoken objective is perpetual war’. See The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve 5th ed. pp. 217-234. There is another account that identifies the membership of the Elite, its historical origins and how it exercises control over governments in Historical Analysis of the Global Elite: Ransacking the World Economy Until ‘You’ll Own Nothing.’
In this way, the maximum number of people (soldiers and civilians) are killed (whether by weapons or by the ‘spin-off’ impacts of them, including the starvation of third-party populations), the remainder are put under more direct (and, more recently, technocratic) control and profits are maximized through weapons sales, improved access to key resources (particularly land, energy and minerals) and rebuilding destroyed infrastructure that, these days, is increasingly technocratized during rebuilding. On the latter point, see ‘Like Halliburton in Iraq, BlackRock to Rake in a Trillion Rebuilding the Destruction They Financed in Ukraine’.
War for Technocracy
But times have changed. And while none of the fundamental objectives of war has changed, the manner in which these objectives are achieved has evolved as technological advances create new possibilities for killing and control, some of them more obscure than others. In essence, these include new ISTAR (intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, reconnaissance) capacities, new weapons systems and new targets.
And while many of these technologies may be ‘battle-tested’ on a military battlefield (such as Ukraine or Iran) or during a genocide such as that being conducted against the Palestinians – see, for example, The Palestine Laboratory: How Israel Exports the Technology of Occupation around the World – they are ultimately intended (and already deployed in many contexts) for use against the vast bulk of the human population; that is, us.
Beyond the killing of many of us, control of the remainder is the intention.
According to Peter Thiel, one of the founders of Palantir, the technology company building significant elements of the technocracy:
The initial founding vision was that we were going to use technology to change the whole world and basically overturn the monetary system of the world… We could never win an election on getting certain things because we were in such a small minority, but maybe you could unilateral[ly] change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through technological means, and this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics. See ‘Peter Thiel: The Billionaire Buying the End of Democracy’.
Among others, when analyst Iain Davis studied the ideology behind the Elite plan his conclusion was simple: ‘This vice-like behavioural control of populations is at the heart of Praxian ideology.’ See ‘The Praxian Genocidal Kill Chain – Part 1’.
To reiterate then: In this context, control means that the Elite plans to kill off many of us and impose technocratic rule on the remaining human population, most of whom will be transhumanized. For a fine, detailed elaboration of the Elite plan, see Patrick Wood’s The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism.
And Wood’s ‘Technocracy News & Trends’ is the authoritative source keeping track of developments in relation to technocracy and transhumanism.
ISTAR & other Technological Capacities
Many advances in ISTAR capacities have been made possible by the deployment of 5G (and soon 6G), and while there is no doubt that this substantially enhances the military capacity to perform many intelligence, surveillance and other functions – for one discussion, see ‘How the 5G network could benefit the military’ – it is also the case that this technology is being used to vastly expand Elite control over the human population generally.
In essence, because the plan is to imprison those left alive as slaves in a technocratic ‘smart city’, the deployment of 5G is enabling a combination of technologies that allow comprehensive (not just mass) surveillance, digitization of our identity and money, as well as robotization of the workforce, policing and the military; geofencing to confine us within the few kilometres between our allocated sleeping quarters and workplace; measures to restructure the global economy in favour of the mega-corporations and consolidation of ownership and control of agricultural land as well as the production, distribution and even nature of the world’s food supply (which will have you eating synthesized, food-like substances that are largely devoid of nutrition). It also includes the power to control the narrative by using government and corporate media and social media to promote Elite propaganda while censoring the truth.
How will this be achieved? Obviously, mainly using technology: Using computers, drones, smart phones, GPS devices, smart TVs and other household devices, social media, smart meters, surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, online banking, license plate readers and driverless cars, you will live under constant surveillance and be readily controlled whether in your sleeping quarters, car or out in the community. And you will be photographed many times each day. Your DNA will not be your own, your internet access will be monitored and controlled; and like everything, your access will depend on your compliance with elite directives.
Combined with economic measures, particularly including changes to banking, a financial transaction control grid is being created: cash is being eliminated and we will be forced to use digital payments using programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies.
As mentioned, all of these technologies are largely dependent on 5G for optimal functioning. When combined, they will be able to digitize our identity and connect it with our bank, health, legal and other records to create a social credit score that will determine what we can and cannot do and where we can do it.
In short, we will be locked in a technological prison, whether it is our sleeping quarters, our car or our local community, in a ‘smart city’. Physical prisons will no longer matter because everywhere will be the prison.
Given the highly militarized world in which we live, substantial research and development budgets ensure the routine production of new and, usually, superior weapons systems. While all of these, when they become public, are usually ‘justified’ by the usual propaganda – they are ‘imperative for national defense’ – the reality is that they can and will be used against civilians.
Remember the atomic weapons dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Out of the hundreds of thousands killed or injured in those blasts, how many were soldiers? Was the fire-bombing of Dresden during World War II intended to kill combatants?
Nothing has changed since World War II and international treaties that supposedly protect civilians in wartime are meaningless.
The Elite still has you in its sights.
Here’s a sample of new (or old but well concealed) weapons systems:
But it is not just Britain that is ‘at war’: so are you. And unless you are using a Linux program to run your computer (and Graphene OS for your phone) and boycotting all corporate software programs (including in relation to email, social media, internet searching, video watching and communications), to defend your online privacy, you are simply surrendering all of the data the Elite needs to enslave or kill you some time in the next few years.
2. Advances in the use of satellite-based technologies are rapidly expanding the capacity for widespread lethality. For example, President Putin recently implied on record that Russia’s satellite constellation will be used to control heavy strike drones – see ‘Orbital Chessboard: Starlink Sits On The Throne, But The Sky Is Getting Crowded And Angry’ – but these can be used against civilians as well as soldiers. And Russia’s constellation is modest compared to the Starlink constellation owned by Elon Musk.
Of course, whether a nuclear weapon or a weapon such as the RS-28 Sarmat is used, as with all of the weapons mentioned here, clearly there can be no distinction between combatants and civilians, even if this issue is ever considered, which is unlikely.
What is a digital kill chain? According to Lt General Philip Campose (Retd), it is the process whereby, and timeframe within which, ‘a force can detect, process, decide, and strike the adversary’s critical targets’. See ‘The digital kill-chain: Russia’s mastery of a critical skill in modern warfare’. This process is reduced from days to hours or, sometimes, minutes with the degree of human engagement in the process highly variable. And this is one reason why so many ‘mistakes’ (that is, unintended killings) are made.
But notice the absence of reference to military targets in this definition. Karp, an arch-Zionist, has been happy for Palantir technology to ‘identify’ Palestinians murdered during the genocide in Gaza. But the technology is also being used to spy on us all as the technocratic state is built around us.
While some of these new technologies are well known, it does not mean that their dangers are equally appreciated, especially those that are aggressively promoted as central to our ‘privacy and security’.
6. Despite the lethality of the weapons systems above, undoubtedly one of the most effective weapon technologies in this category to date has been vaccines, with the documented death toll from this weapon, as well as its incapacitating impacts on vast numbers of others, now extensive. For just one source that cites 1349 other sources, see Sayer Ji’s ‘Vaccination’.
And while micro- and nanocontamination from vaccines and other sources has long been documented – see ‘New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination’ – it is now at dangerous levels worldwide. The website ‘Unhackable Animal’ offers a photo gallery (in development) and a lengthy book of 344 color microscopy images, coupled with short essays, of blood taken by ‘The Micronauts’, an international group of researchers, that reveals ‘assembled synthetic biology and nanotechnology contamin[ants] from hundreds of samples, including drinking water, pharmaceuticals, supplements, dermal patches, nasal swabs, household products, environmental samples and bodily fluids, documenting evidence of the undisclosed adulteration of our bodies and the environment…. [demonstrating] how we are unknowingly being hacked by the transhumanist and AI Biodigital convergence agenda to merge organic life with technology.’ See Nano Nano: Microscopy Investigations.
New Targets
As should now be obvious, the Elite has conducted an increasingly sophisticated and complex war over recent centuries as new technologies have been developed, some of which have made it possible to expand the range of targets.
Undoubtedly the most critical development in this regard concerns weapons to control the human mind, a very long-term undertaking that now involves a vast range of technologies and takes place in four dimensions: psychological mind control, political mind control, medical mind control, and technological mind control. These capacities are already deployed. See ‘The Elite’s 5,000-Year War on Your Mind is Climaxing: Can We Defeat it?’
The essence of these technologies is simple: the target is citizens (not armies or guerrillas) and the battlefield is the mind (not a location somewhere).
Czech researcher Mojmír Babáček, who has long studied this subject, concluded his 2004 study with this warning:
One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of the human brain is that the governments, who own such technologies, could use them without having to consult public opinion. Needless to say, any meaningful democracy in today’s world could be disrupted, through secret and covert operations. It is not inconceivable that in the future, entire population groups subjected to mind control technologies, could be living in a ‘fake democracy’ where their own government or a foreign power could broadly shape their political opinions by means of mind control technologies. See ‘Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons: The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain’.
Or the Elite, while directing its puppets in government and the technology sphere, could shape your perception of your existence in one of their ‘smart city’ slave camps so that you believe you are living an ideal life.
Without a mind of your own, the Elite will have total control of your being.
In essence, it is a very long time since the bodies of enemy combatants with a weapon were, in theory at least, the sole target. You – your body and your mind – are now the target.
Which is why the most dangerous weapons are the ones targeting you that you do not, or cannot, perceive.
Resisting the Elite’s War on Humanity
So if we are to defend ourselves against the Elite program to kill or enslave us all, it is crucial that more people understand that program and that those who are courageous enough to do so, take strategic action to resist it.
This requires us to resist war itself, but also the technocratic program that underpins it.
Therefore we must undermine both the existing foundations that make war possible and also those other technological foundations being put in place to kill or control us all. The strategic goals necessary to achieve the former are identified here: ‘Strategic Goals for Ending War’.
And the strategic goals necessary to defeat the Elite-driven effort to impose a technocratic control grid on the human population have been identified on the ‘We Are Human We Are Free’website, which identifies 30 strategic goals but also includes a one-page flyer (available in 24 languages) which nominates those actions that must be undertaken as a priority if we are to defeat the rapidly advancing planetary technocracy.
Each component of this strategy will require ongoing effort to mobilize enough people to take action.
Conclusion
The rapidly advancing Elite takeover will require committed individual and community effort to defeat it.
There are some vital actions that you will need to take if you wish to defend yourself. They cannot be done for you.
And there are critical actions that will require community effort.
The challenge for those who are aware already is to commit themselves to acting strategically and engaging others to do so too.
Or, as Martin Niemoller wrote following the Nazi takeover in Germany and his eight years in Nazi prisons and concentration camps: ‘Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.’
Truth11 Films 5th short film: We have been tricked into fighting perpetual wars of mass genocide for pointless profit. There is no enemy. The enemy is within the US government. All exterior enemies are created to justify the advancing military industrial complex.
There is only one way war will end. The masses must rise up, unite, and demand world peace.
This film contains the footage released by Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange.
Login
