Donald Trump rivendica la scelta di sospendere parte delle sanzioni e dei dazi contro la Russia previsti dalla legge promossa dal defunto senatore guerrafondaio repubblicano Lindsey Graham, noto per le sue posizioni duramente russofobe. Una decisione che segnala le contraddizioni della strategia sanzionatoria di Washington e i costi che questa politica rischia di imporre alla stessa economia statunitense. «È un'ottima decisione. Sarà vantaggiosa per il Paese e, a mio avviso, anche per il mondo, perché ci troviamo in uno scenario globale», ha dichiarato il presidente USA, difendendo la scelta in nome dell'interesse nazionale degli Stati Uniti.

L'ordine esecutivo adottato dalla Casa Bianca esenta dall'applicazione alcune delle misure previste dalla legge Graham, tra cui i dazi del 500% sui prodotti russi e quelli secondari fino al 100% contro i principali acquirenti internazionali di energia russa. Misure punitive che avrebbero potuto colpire non soltanto Mosca, ma anche i partner commerciali della Russia e gli equilibri dei mercati internazionali. Da Mosca è arrivata una reazione positiva. Kirill Dmitriev, direttore del Fondo russo per gli investimenti diretti e inviato speciale della presidenza russa, ha definito la sospensione «un momento decisivo e storico».

Secondo Dmitriev, l'applicazione della legge avrebbe potuto paralizzare la cooperazione economica tra Russia e Stati Uniti, provocando danni significativi soprattutto all'economia statunitense e ai mercati globali. Il rappresentante russo ha inoltre sottolineato che la cooperazione economica tra i due Paesi può favorire la stabilità internazionale, rafforzare la fiducia reciproca e creare le condizioni per una pace duratura. La decisione di Trump mette così in evidenza i limiti di una strategia che punta a utilizzare dazi e sanzioni come strumenti di pressione geopolitica, anche a costo di produrre conseguenze negative per gli stessi Stati Uniti.

Mentre una parte dell'establishment USA continua a promuovere una linea di confronto con Mosca, la Casa Bianca riconosce che la cooperazione economica può rispondere meglio agli interessi nazionali e contribuire alla stabilità globale. Resta da vedere se questa sospensione rappresenterà un passo concreto verso il superamento della logica della guerra economica o soltanto una pausa tattica nella contrapposizione tra Washington e Mosca.

LA NOTIZIA CHE HAI LETTO FA PARTE DE "Il MONDO IN 10 NOTIZIE" - LA NEWSLETTER CHE OGNI GIORNO ALLE 7.00 DEL MATTINO ARRIVA NELLE EMAIL DEI NOSTRI ABBONATI. 

SCOPRI COME ABBONARTI A L'ANTIDIPLOMATICO E SOSTENERE LA NOSTRA LUNGA MARCIA

CLICCA QUI

A Gaza City si sono svolti i funerali di 75 palestinesi, tra cui donne e bambini, i cui resti sono stati recuperati dalle macerie di abitazioni bombardate da Israele nei primi mesi della guerra. Le vittime appartenevano a circa 20 famiglie. Le operazioni di recupero proseguono tra enormi difficoltà, a causa della mancanza di mezzi pesanti e attrezzature adeguate.

Secondo la Protezione civile palestinese, oltre 8.000 palestinesi risultano ancora dispersi sotto le macerie e, con le risorse attualmente disponibili, il recupero dei corpi potrebbe richiedere circa otto anni.

Nonostante gli impegni previsti dall'accordo di cessate il fuoco in vigore dal 10 ottobre 2025, le autorità palestinesi accusano Israele di non aver consentito l'ingresso dei macchinari necessari.

Dall'ottobre 2023, l'offensiva israeliana ha provocato oltre 74.000 morti e 175.000 feriti, distruggendo circa il 90% delle infrastrutture civili della Striscia.

La Cina ha ospitato la fondazione del Centro di Comunicazione dei Media del Sud Globale, iniziativa che riunisce quattro testate: teleSUR, l’agenzia cubana Prensa Latina, il brasiliano Brasil de Fato e la ghanese Pan Africa TV. L’obiettivo è rafforzare la collaborazione giornalistica e costruire narrazioni autonome, capaci di superare i paradigmi dominanti dei media occidentali.

La nuova piattaforma punta inoltre a consolidare i legami tra la Cina e i Paesi del Sud Globale, promuovendo lo scambio di contenuti e competenze tecnologiche. Tra le proposte emerse figurano una formazione permanente sull’intelligenza artificiale per i giornalisti e una maggiore cooperazione per ridurre la dipendenza dalle infrastrutture digitali controllate da attori esterni.

L’iniziativa mira così a rafforzare la sovranità comunicativa e l’indipendenza informativa dei Paesi del Sud Globale, offrendo maggiore spazio alle loro prospettive sui cambiamenti internazionali.

LA NOTIZIA CHE HAI LETTO FA PARTE DE "Il MONDO IN 10 NOTIZIE" - LA NEWSLETTER CHE OGNI GIORNO ALLE 7.00 DEL MATTINO ARRIVA NELLE EMAIL DEI NOSTRI ABBONATI. 

SCOPRI COME ABBONARTI A L'ANTIDIPLOMATICO E SOSTENERE LA NOSTRA LUNGA MARCIA

CLICCA QUI

Il ministro degli Esteri russo, Sergej Lavrov, ha affermato che le critiche mosse dai paesi europei e dal regime di Kiev all’accordo sul diesel tra Russia e Stati Uniti sono «una farsa» e «autopromozione».

«L'accordo sul gasolio tra Mosca e Washington è una questione che riguarda Mosca e Washington. Mentre l'Unione Europea lo considera un tradimento nei confronti dell'Ucraina, lo stesso Zelensky afferma che la questione dell'esportazione del gasolio russo debba essere discussa con lui, perché solo lui può dare l'autorizzazione. Ma questo non ha nulla a che vedere con la sicurezza energetica, si tratta piuttosto di autopromozione e di una pagliacciata», ha dichiarato.

Lavrov ha spiegato i recenti attacchi di Zelensky contro Donald Trump come il risultato del timore del leader del regime ucraino che qualcuno possa dimenticarsi della sua esistenza. «Ieri ha chiesto loro altre decine di miliardi e non hanno ancora risposto», ha affermato il ministro. Ha proseguito affermando che la sicurezza energetica (utilizzata come pretesto da coloro che criticano l’accordo) è ciò che unisce tutti i paesi e costituisce la base della cooperazione della Russia con gli altri paesi nell’ambito dell’OPEC+.

Il Segretario al Tesoro degli Stati Uniti, Scott Bessent, ha rivolto un duro avvertimento al leader del regime di Kiev, Volodymyr Zelensky, dopo che quest'ultimo ha accusato Washington di aver imposto restrizioni al funzionamento del sistema Starlink, utilizzato dalle forze armate ucraine, e di aver interrotto la condivisione di dati di intelligence.

«Il presidente Trump e il segretario Rubio hanno affermato categoricamente che nessuno all'interno dell'amministrazione Trump ha fatto una cosa del genere, e ritengo che sia molto avventato da parte del presidente Zelenski formulare un'accusa di questo tipo (...) Il presidente Zelenski dovrebbe prestare molta attenzione quando rilascia dichiarazioni come questa, che non corrispondono al vero», ha avvertito in un'intervista alla NBC News.

Elon Musk, proprietario di SpaceX, l’azienda che sviluppa Starlink, sostiene che le restrizioni relative alla versione militare del segnale siano state introdotte su ordine delle autorità statunitensi. «I sistemi Starshield sono di proprietà del governo degli Stati Uniti e sono sotto il suo controllo. Qualsiasi limitazione di velocità o di utilizzo è stabilita dall’esercito statunitense e, in ultima istanza, dal presidente degli Stati Uniti», ha scritto su X.

Da parte sua, il presidente degli Stati Uniti, Donald Trump, ha smentito le accuse di Zelensky secondo cui Washington avrebbe limitato l’accesso a Starlink. Ha inoltre sottolineato che, per quanto ne sapeva, «tutto rimane come prima», mettendo in dubbio che il funzionamento del servizio fosse mai stato interrotto. «Sono abbastanza sicuro che tutto rimanga immutato», ha affermato.

Allo stesso modo, il segretario di Stato statunitense, Marco Rubio, ha dichiarato di non conoscere la teoria di Zelensky riguardo alla causa delle limitazioni, ma che «non ha nulla a che vedere con la Casa Bianca».

 

Police fired rubber bullets and tear gas during a fifth consecutive day of unrest in Tirana, as student demonstrations over corruption, employment and education developed into a nationwide challenge to the government.

Albania’s political crisis deepened on Saturday, 17th October, as violent anti-government protests continued for a fifth consecutive day, with demonstrators attacking police and public buildings in the capital, Tirana, and demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Edi Rama.

Police used tear gas, water cannon and rubber bullets to disperse protesters outside the Ministry of Education after groups of masked demonstrators threw stones, petrol bombs and fireworks at security forces. The disturbances subsequently spread through the city centre, including areas near the prime minister’s office.

According to the latest figures released by Albanian police, 167 people had been arrested and 132 officers injured during five days of unrest. Seven police officers were also suspended pending investigations into allegations of excessive force.

The demonstrations have become one of the most serious domestic challenges to Rama since his Socialist Party came to power in 2013.

Students transform an environmental protest into a political movement

The current unrest grew out of a campaign known as the Flamingo movement, which began earlier this year in opposition to a controversial luxury tourism development associated with Jared Kushner, the son-in-law of US President Donald Trump.

The development attracted objections from local residents and environmental campaigners concerned about land ownership, planning decisions and potential damage to protected coastal areas.

What began as a dispute over tourism development subsequently expanded into a wider protest against alleged government corruption, unemployment, education standards and the cost of living.

The involvement of high-school and university students has considerably increased both the scale and political significance of the demonstrations.

Students have demanded improvements to educational facilities, additional financial support and better employment opportunities for graduates. Frustration over the limited prospects available to young Albanians has also brought emigration into the debate.

During Saturday’s demonstrations, protesters burned a suitcase outside the Education Ministry, using it as a symbol of the pressure on young people to leave Albania in search of work.

The protests began peacefully before violence erupted when masked participants attacked police positions.

According to accounts from Tirana, government offices, banks and commercial premises have been damaged during several days of confrontations.

Demonstrations have also spread beyond Tirana to other Albanian cities.

Rama refuses to resign

Rama, who is serving his fourth term as prime minister, has rejected demands for his resignation and accused political opponents of encouraging violence to destabilise the government.

He has acknowledged the right of citizens to demonstrate but insisted that attacks on public institutions and private property cannot be treated as legitimate political protest.

The government has pledged to prosecute those responsible for vandalism and assaults on police officers.

National Police Chief Skender Hita has defended the security operation, arguing that officers have faced repeated attacks by masked groups. At the same time, the suspension of seven officers indicates that allegations concerning police conduct are being investigated.

The political opposition has sought to capitalise on the unrest, although the Flamingo movement initially developed outside Albania’s established party structures.

That distinction complicates the government’s argument that the demonstrations are primarily the result of opposition-party activity.

The protests have also exposed tensions between the government’s economic development policies and opposition from communities concerned about corruption, land rights and access to employment.

EU accession adds another dimension

The crisis comes at a particularly sensitive moment in Albania’s negotiations to join the European Union.

On 13th October, just as the demonstrations were gathering momentum, Brussels and Tirana provisionally closed negotiations on enterprise and industrial policy.

The agreement marked another step towards membership, bringing the number of provisionally completed negotiating chapters to four out of 33.

Albania has already opened all 33 chapters, placing it among the more advanced candidates in the Western Balkans.

However, the EU’s negotiating framework makes clear that progress on fundamental reforms, including judicial independence, democratic institutions and the rule of law, determines the overall pace of accession.

As EU Today recently reported, Brussels is considering additional safeguards designed to prevent democratic backsliding following enlargement.

The current protests do not automatically jeopardise Albania’s accession negotiations. Public demonstrations, including those directed against an elected government, are not themselves evidence of a failure to meet democratic standards.

The relevant questions for Brussels concern the authorities’ response, the independence of investigations into police conduct, the treatment of detainees and whether allegations of corruption are properly examined.

These matters fall directly within the EU’s assessment of the rule of law and the functioning of democratic institutions.

A political test ahead of possible EU membership

Rama has made EU membership by 2030 a central objective of his government, presenting accession as the foundation of Albania’s future economic and political development.

The acceleration of negotiations has given his administration a substantial diplomatic achievement. It has not, however, resolved dissatisfaction over domestic governance or living standards.

The growing involvement of students also means the demonstrations are no longer confined to the environmental dispute that originally triggered the movement.

For the European Commission, the immediate challenge is to maintain a credible distinction between technical progress in accession negotiations and its assessment of political developments inside the candidate country.

For Rama, the question is whether he can restore public order without intensifying opposition to a government that has been in office for more than 13 years.

Further demonstrations would place additional pressure on the authorities, particularly if the movement continues to spread beyond the capital and attracts broader support from trade unions, students and other dissatisfied groups.

Redução das retenções na fonte em novembro pode originar um pagamento de mais de 2 mil euros em 2027. O Ministério das Finanças comunicou nesta semana que, em novembro, vai reduzir em 50% as retenções do IRS. “Esta decisão ocorre para que as famílias beneficiem imediatamente desta descida, não tendo de esperar pelo acerto do IRS no próximo ano”, continua o comunicado do Governo. Foi o rumo o Governo definiu para antecipar o efeito da descida extraordinária do IRS, que já aprovada pela Assembleia da República para os rendimentos de 2026 – com efeitos retroativos a janeiro. Em dezembro, voltam

Diplomats from Belgium, France and Poland were attacked by Israeli settlers during an olive-harvesting visit to the occupied West Bank, prompting calls for further European sanctions and an investigation by Israeli authorities.

The settlers attacked a delegation of European diplomats and Catholic representatives in the occupied West Bank on Saturday, 17th October, assaulting a French mayor and damaging a Belgian diplomatic vehicle during a visit intended to support Palestinian olive farmers.

The delegation included Belgium’s consul general, French and Polish diplomats and representatives of the Catholic Church. The incident occurred near the Palestinian village of Taybeh, where settlers confronted visitors accompanying local residents during the annual olive harvest.

Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot condemned the violence and announced that Brussels would press for additional European Union sanctions against those responsible. He also called on Israel to meet its obligations as the occupying power and protect Palestinians, journalists and foreign diplomatic representatives.

According to accounts of the incident, Bernard Baudoux, mayor of the French town of Aulnoye-Aymeries, was assaulted while attempting to enter a vehicle bearing diplomatic plates. The attack also involved members of a Catholic delegation, including Archbishop Vincent Dollmann of Cambrai.

Three people were reportedly injured. Belgian diplomatic personnel were confirmed to be safe.

Diplomatic incident draws Israeli condemnation

Israel’s military described the attack as a serious act of violence but said that the delegation’s visit had not been coordinated with the Israeli authorities and that soldiers had not been present when the confrontation occurred.

Israeli police subsequently opened an investigation.

Foreign Minister Gideon Saar publicly condemned the actions of the settlers and said his ministry was in contact with the ambassadors of the countries involved. The Israeli government’s response comes amid mounting international criticism of settler violence against Palestinian communities in the West Bank.

The circumstances are particularly sensitive because the victims included accredited diplomatic representatives from three EU member states. The incident therefore extends beyond the continuing disputes over land ownership and Palestinian access to agricultural areas, raising questions about the protection of foreign officials carrying out recognised diplomatic activities.

For Belgium, the attack has reinforced an existing position in favour of stronger European measures against violent settlers and organisations supporting settlement expansion.

Prévot linked the violence to Israeli settlement policy, arguing that the attacks could not be considered separately from the broader circumstances of the occupation.

A growing dispute over European sanctions

The European Union has already introduced targeted restrictive measures against individuals and organisations associated with serious abuses against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.

In May 2026, the Council of the EU imposed additional sanctions on three individuals and four organisations, including the Nachala Settlement Movement and the Amana cooperative association.

The measures were adopted under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime and included asset freezes, prohibitions on making funds available to designated persons and travel restrictions on listed individuals.

The Council said the sanctioned organisations had supported or facilitated activities resulting in the displacement of Palestinian communities and the loss of property.

However, agreement on broader economic measures against Israel has proved substantially more difficult.

As EU Today previously reported, European governments have considered restrictions on trade involving Israeli settlements, while divisions between member states have complicated attempts to establish a common position.

The latest attack gives Belgium, France and Poland a direct diplomatic interest in the outcome of any further discussion. Whether this produces a new sanctions agreement will depend on negotiations between EU governments, rather than unilateral declarations by individual ministers.

Violence during the olive harvest

The incident occurred amid escalating attacks on Palestinian farmers during the annual olive harvest, an important source of income for communities across the West Bank.

Harvesting frequently involves access to agricultural land situated near Israeli settlements or in areas where Palestinians face movement restrictions. Local farmers have complained of intimidation, destruction of trees and attacks by settlers attempting to prevent them from reaching their property.

According to reporting from the area, the Palestinian Health Ministry said at least four people had been killed and more than 100 injured since this year’s harvest began.

The attack on the European delegation followed another serious incident involving American photojournalist Heidi Levine, who was assaulted while covering attacks on Palestinian olive harvesters.

The violence has attracted criticism from international organisations and foreign governments, including those maintaining close diplomatic relations with Israel.

Wider implications for EU–Israel relations

The diplomatic confrontation comes against a background of longstanding disagreement between Brussels and the Israeli government over settlement expansion and the legal status of the occupied territories.

The European Union does not recognise Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank and regards settlements established there as contrary to international law. Israel disputes the application of this legal interpretation to the territory.

The latest incident is unlikely, by itself, to determine the future of EU–Israel relations. It does, however, strengthen demands from governments already advocating targeted sanctions and more effective measures against settlement-related violence.

For Belgium, France and Poland, the immediate questions concern the safety of their diplomatic personnel, the Israeli investigation and whether the perpetrators will face prosecution.

For the EU collectively, the matter now extends to whether its existing sanctions framework can address continuing attacks against Palestinians and, increasingly, European representatives themselves.