50 Cent has pulled back the curtain on the darkest secret in entertainment. Beyoncé didn’t rise to the top on talent alone. She was trafficked as a child. By her Satanic family. Starting at age three. Passed [...]
The post Leaked 50 Cent Doc Exposes ‘Possessed’ Beyonce Sacrificing Children in Satanic Rituals appeared first on The People's Voice.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) does not exist and was invented by Big Pharma in conspiracy with government regulatory agencies to hook vulnerable children on lucrative psychiatric drugs, according to leading American behavioral biologist Dr. [...]
The post World’s Top Neurologist Blows Whistle ‘ADHD Does Not Exist, It Was Invented To Hook Kids on Drugs’ appeared first on The People's Voice.
Democratic Socialist and Jacksonville Rep. Angie Nixon won Florida's Democratic Senate Primary against retired Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman on Tuesday.
The Details: Vindman reportedly acquired over $16 million in campaign funding, compared to Nixon's $975,000. While Vindman spent roughly $2.2 million on advertising, Nixon spent about $60,000. Nixon, who Reason (Center bias) said "was really not favored to win at all," asserted during her campaign, "Floridians don't want the establishment in Washington DC deciding who their Democratic nominee and US senator is going to be." Though Vindman refused to debate her during the primary race, he endorsed her impending campaign in his concession speech. Nixon beat Vindman with about 56% of votes and is now set to face incumbent Sen. Ashley Moody (R) in November's general election.
RELATED: What to Make of DSA's Rise and Revisions | AllSides
How The Media Covered It: Outlets on the right more prominently emphasized Nixon's affiliation with the DSA, often framing it negatively. Reason joined in calling her "an underfunded, ultraprogressive, card-carrying [DSA member]." The Wall Street Journal (Center), on the other hand, used the softer term "progressive" when describing her in its headline. Reason criticized Nixon's win as "a reminder that we're being swept up in a wave of populist, socialist candidates who appeal to people without an understanding of basic economic concepts." It called it "insane that the platform was seemingly attractive enough to springboard a total underdog candidate to primary success" but noted, "It's also possible that Vindman just wasn't an attractive candidate to the state's Democrats." New York Post (Right) agreed that because of Vindman's shambolic battles and impeachment attempt against President Donald Trump, "many Florida Democrats seemed to believe that Vindman's time had passed."
RELATED: Impeachment Witness Alexander Vindman 'Escorted' From White House | AllSides
Nixon's Platform: Nixon officially joined the DSA, which gained success in Philadelphia, Colorado, Michigan and New York City primary races so far, prior to launching her campaign. Her campaign priorities include publicly-funded Medicare, childcare, employment leave, and college; a $25 federal minimum wage; student loan forgiveness; abolishment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); a billionaire tax; cancellation of federal funding to Israel; and a rent freeze.
Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.
A personalized mRNA vaccine combined with Keytruda immunotherapy, developed by Moderna and Merck, successfully prevented skin cancer from recurring or spreading in patients during a phase 3 clinical trial.
The Details: Each vaccine is designed "specifically for each patient based on the unique set of mutations within their tumor to train and activate the immune system to recognize and fight cancer," according to Moderna and Merck. The trial enrolled 1,137 high-risk patients that had surgically removed melanoma. The patients were randomized, with half receiving Keytruda immunotherapy plus the mRNA vaccine and half receiving just Keytruda. In January, the companies announced at the mid-stage of the trial that the vaccine reduced the risk of recurrence of cancer or death by 49% after five years. Shares in Moderna went up 60% in premarket trading after the announcement.
For Context: The National Cancer Institute found that in 2023, 1.5 million Americans were living with melanoma, which is the deadliest form of skin cancer. mRNA vaccines were first made available to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic, and since then, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved other mRNA vaccines for the flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
How the Media Covered It: CNN (Lean Left bias) focused on the stock market gains for the companies, noting that "Barclays analysts said they expect the therapy could generate about $3 billion for treating melanoma by 2035." Reuters (Center) reported that Moderna "struggled to generate new products beyond its COVID-19 vaccine and faced pushback over its mRNA technology from President Donald Trump's administration," making this new vaccine a potential "reversal of fortune" for the company. Epoch Times (Lean Right) highlighted views from supporters and critics of mRNA vaccines, writing that proponents "say the technology is superior to older vaccine platforms, in part because it can be quickly reconfigured," while critics are concerned about potential "serious side effects, including cancer."
Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.
The Trump administration on Tuesday filed for a removal of restrictions on 44 million acres of the National Forest System, potentially making room for logging and mining to take place.
The Details: The US Forest Service filed for a rescission of the Roadless Area Conservation Rule, according to the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The department said the "one-size-fits-all restriction" has prevented forest managers from easily accessing areas and completing work to prevent wildfires across the country. If passed, the land could be open for development through roadway creation, logging, mining and oil and coal drilling.
For Context: Former President Bill Clinton passed the "Roadless Rule" before leaving office in 2001 to limit development in national forestlands. Last year, the Trump administration took the first steps to repeal the rule as part of President Trump's "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation" executive order, which removes "unnecessary regulatory burdens."
Proposal and Implications: Newsweek (Center bias) provided overall objective coverage of the proposal and arguments on both sides. The outlet noted that if repealed, new roads and development projects wouldn't automatically be authorized. Instead, decisions would return to local forest planning processes and land managers who would decide what appropriate activities would take place under existing environmental laws and regulations. The outlet included a map of the areas most impacted by the Roadless Rule.
Concern from Environmental Groups: Outlets on the left noted arguments by the USDA in favor of the move, but generally amplified opposition from environmental groups and political leaders. The Scientific American (Lean Left) quoted a leader from the Natural Resources Defense Council who said "The Trump administration is moving to gut our most iconic national forests." The Washington Post (Lean Left) cited concerns from advocacy groups that the move could lead to more human-caused fires if they get access to those areas. The outlet also noted wildfires have been amplified by climate change. The Los Angeles Times (Lean Left) warned that development could "fragment habitats and increase erosion and sediment pollution in drinking water."
Creating Opportunity: The story was less covered by outlets on the right. The Daily Caller (Right) noted 76% of voters support the Roadless Rule. The outlet quoted a spokesperson from the Center for Energy and Conservation at Independent Women who said the discussion "needs more nuance" as the land can "be open to both commercial and recreational uses." The spokesperson also said it's "ludicrous to insinuate the Trump administration would shut down access to forestlands." Another article from the Daily Caller framed the move as combatting a Clinton-era policy and said it comes after "another destructive wildfire season." The outlet also highlighted praise from Republican Western governors.
Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.
Following the death of Jason Arday, the youngest-ever black professor at Cambridge University, media outlets are attempting to explain what went wrong, from intense media scrutiny and DEI policies to failures in academic institutions and accusations of racism.
The Details: Plagiarism concerns over Arday's PhD thesis and journal articles rose last year. Arday resigned on Aug. 5 following scrutiny over his academic work and personal background. On Aug. 14, first responders found Arday, 41, unresponsive in Battersea, South London, where he had reportedly died. The official cause of death has not yet been publicly confirmed.
Media Scrutiny: According to The Independent (Lean Left), 249 national press articles were written about Arday over 22 days. An opinion writer for the Independent argued, "Investigative journalism is at its best when it exposes abuses of power, corruption and misconduct," however, "There is a profound difference between interrogating power and allowing the machinery of investigation to bear down, relentlessly, on one academic."
Against Censorship: An opinion in UnHerd (Center) criticized some higher education professionals and organizations for using Arday's death to "amplify an existing censorship agenda." The writer argued that incidents of network harassment "are to be deplored," but advancing censorship and identity politics "will do little to aid progress in this area." An opinion from Michelle Goldberg (Left) in the New York Times (Lean Left) similarly argued that "those pressing for new controls on the press are making a serious mistake." Goldberg linked conservative media's interest in the story to backlash against DEI, but warned that progressive efforts to "stifle questions about those initiatives" could make backlash worse. She also argued that responsibility extended beyond sensational media coverage and faulted institutions like Cambridge for elevating Arday's profile while ignoring warning signs that he was "a fabulist."
'DEI Devotion': The Federalist (Right) blamed what it described as leftist academics' devotion to upholding DEI, and that those same people are now "maintaining that he was the victim of those who called out the DEI scam." It argued that Arday wouldn't be dead "if not for having been elevated to a position he had not earned and was not equipped to maintain under legitimate scrutiny or pressure." An opinion writer for The Daily Wire (Right) said Arday's story shows that "DEI hires are held to a lower standard than those hired via a competitive process." The outlet said that "By facilitating and even applauding his delusions, the credulous, obsequious DEI machine did Arday no favors." Both outlets highlighted other instances of plagiarism in higher ed from black professors.
'Racism': The Conversation (Lean Left) said Arday's death reflects the "intense skepticism Black scholars face." The outlet said "When an appointment symbolizes racial progress, serious allegations can spread suspicion beyond the individual" and pointed to what it said was "a double standard" in higher-ed treatment of minority faculty members. Townhall (Right) denounced claims of racism and poked fun at several online posts that blamed "White Lies" for Arday's death. The outlet said, "It's clear that the Left is not going to let this narrative that racism is to blame for Arday's downfall go." The Daily Wire also wrote that Arday and his defenders followed a common playbook: deny the allegations and then "accuse critics of racism."
Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.
President Trump said the United States has delayed imposing a new 50% tariff against Canada for three days as the two sides are close to reaching a trade deal.
Key Quotes: Trump wrote on Truth Social, "I have paused the 50% Tariffs against Canada, that were scheduled to kick in tomorrow morning for a three day period, based on the fact that Canada and the U.S.A., subject to the finalization of documents, have a DEAL!" Canada's Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a letter posted on X, "Substantial progress has been made, although there is important work still to be done." The Office of the US Trade Representative said on X, "The deal will include comprehensive market access for all American goods, economic security commitments, digital trade alignment."
The Details: The announcement was made less than two hours before a 50% tariff on almost $20 billion of Canadian imports was set to take effect. Affected products would have included Canadian imports like alcohol, dairy, cement, apparel, and hockey equipment. The Trump administration announced the tariffs in June, claiming there was Canadian trade "discrimination" against US businesses. In spring 2025, the US and Canada both levied 25% tariffs against each other's aluminum and steel imports as well as automotive imports.
Trade Context: In 2025, US trade volume with Canada was over $700 billion, down from over $900 billion in 2024. During Trump's first term, his administration, alongside Canada and Mexico, replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with a new trilateral free trade agreement, the USMCA. Last month, the Trump administration declined to renew the USMCA and said it would pursue independent trade deals with each country.
Keystone XL: Trump also said, "The great Keystone XL Pipeline, long ago killed by Sleepy Joe Biden, may be awoken from the grave!" BBC News (Center bias) noted that both the Biden and Obama administrations blocked the pipeline and that "environmentalists and indigenous groups have long opposed the pipeline."
How The Media Covered It: Canadian public broadcaster CBC (Lean Left) said the impending deal brings "some degree of momentary relief to companies on both sides of the border who worried the fees would devastate small businesses, disrupt supply chains and drive up the cost of living for everyday families" but that "there is no guarantee Canada can dodge tariffs long-term." Fox Business (Lean Right) noted that Canada has had a 25% tariff in place on American auto-related products since 2025, though it did not note that the US also has one in place on Canada.
Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.
Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) loans through companies like Klarna, Afterpay, and Affirm have grown steadily since 2020, and these loans now offer options to finance regular household bills like rent, gas, and utilities. Are BNPL loans good for Americans, or a risky symptom of today's economy?
Loans for Electricity and Rent: New York Times (Lean Left bias) noted that Americans spent $160 billion through BNPL loans in 2025, nearly twice the spending from 2023. The Times highlighted that more and more consumers are using these loans for daily essentials rather than consumer indulgences, noting a LendingTree survey that found that half of the company's users "said they could not make ends meet otherwise." Though BNPL companies frame their loans as an alternative to interest-heavy credit card debt, The Times also highlighted concerns that these companies have created "hundreds of billions of dollars in consumer debt that isn't captured in traditional economic analyses and snapshots" because their loans exist outside the mainstream credit ecosystem.
What Do These Companies Think? Ryan Metcalf, Flex's vice president of public affairs, told The Times, "We can't solve income, or the price of rent and affordability. What we can help people solve is a timing issue. It's harm reduction."
Interest Free? Straight Arrow News (Center) reported that BNPL companies "quietly" add interest fees through late payments, payment rescheduling fees, and other hidden costs. According to Straight Arrow News, one-third of BNPL borrowers accrue interest on their loans, and about half of users have paid late fees as a result of a missed payment. Missed payment fees are typically $7-8, which often surpasses the cost of interest, Straight Arrow claimed. In line with The Time's findings that more and more borrowers are using BNPL loans for things like rent and utilities, Straight Arrow News cited stats showing that 46% of users have used pay-later loans on groceries.
The Most Financially Destructive Force in America: Ted Jenkin, writing for Fox News Opinion (Right) in August 2025, took a stronger stance, arguing that "Buy now, pay later is the worst thing for consumers since payday loans." Jenkin noted that credit card balances hit an all-time high of $1.12 trillion, and with the normalization of BNPL loans, "we've built a nation that's not just living paycheck to paycheck—it's now borrowing paycheck to paycheck." Ultimately, Jenkin argued that "we need to stop pretending that BNPL is some kind of harmless financial tool" and instead acknowledge that "it's the fast track to delinquency and bankruptcy for people who can least afford it."
Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.
Democrats say there are “conflicts of interest.” Could that be an understatement?
© Pool
The British government has published a pamphlet for migrants to politely request they respect the customs of the United Kingdom, and stop raping women and engaging in sexual acts with children. In an apparent tacit [...]
The post UK Gov’t Publishes Official Pamphlet Asking Migrants To Stop Raping Children appeared first on The People's Voice.
Even the little victories matter.
© GIORGIO VIERA
Do you remember the media frenzy over lab-grown meat? Why, several years later, has it not become a supermarket staple? Erin Somers investigates with wry humor as she throws herself, and her taste buds, into exploring why cultivated meat has yet to take over the world. You’ll devour this piece.
The two of them ate with forks and knives, passing the plate, sawing off thoughtful bites. Chewing slowly. Afterward they rendered their verdicts. “I would say it is somewhere on the spectrum between a Boca Burger and McDonald’s,” Schonwald told a reporter from NBC. “The absence of fat makes a big difference. It has the texture, which I was not expecting. It was like an animal-protein cake.” Rützler noted the burger’s blandness to a reporter from Science. “There is room for improvement here,” she said. At the end of the event, roughly $150,000 worth of burger remained uneaten. But none of this stopped Post from predicting that meat cultivated in a lab would become a consumer product within the decade.
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has issued a public call for for Mossad-style action against US political commentators Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, declaring “the Jewish people have to be feared.” Shmuley’s murderous rant began when he [...]
The post Rabbi Shmuley Says Israel Must Assassinate Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson So ‘Americans Learn to Fear Jewish People’ appeared first on The People's Voice.
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Aug. 20, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday insisted that Americans should welcome artificial intelligence data centers in their communities, despite polls showing widespread opposition to their construction across the US, as well as mounting evidence of their negative impacts on the environment, public health, and Americans’ utility bills.
During a White House event with cryptocurrency and technology leaders, Trump was asked what he would say to working-class voters who backed him in the 2024 election but are skeptical about the benefits of AI.
Trump said he saw no reason why there should be opposition to building data centers, which have drawn criticism for producing pollution and forcing major spikes in utility bills thanks to their massive energy needs.
“If I were the mayor of a town or the governor of a state, and I had a chance to get a big plant in, an AI plant, or a data center, I would absolutely want it,” Trump explained. “The jobs are enormous and the money paid, the taxes paid, are enormous. And if you don’t take it, you’re going to be left behind because there are plenty of places that want it.”
The president then suggested that the only reason data centers aren’t popular is due to lack of effective propaganda from the tech industry.
“Maybe it could use a little public relations help,” he said.
Trump: "If I were the mayor of a town or the governor or a state, and I had a chance to get a big data center, I would absolutely want it" pic.twitter.com/9caqZ8L76b
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 19, 2026
An internal memo written by the National Republican Senatorial Committee that leaked to Axios on Wednesday warned Silicon Valley that data centers were massively unpopular throughout the country and were putting GOP candidates at risk.
In particular, the memo singled out the US Senate race in Ohio, where former Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown has used incumbent Republican Sen. Jon Husted’s support for data centers as a cudgel.
“If voters’ perceptions of data centers are not fixed quickly,” the memo cautioned, “the campaign against them will expand far beyond Ohio.”
The New York Times reported on Thursday that the backlash to data centers has gotten so strong that it has inspired recall campaigns against officials who approved their construction in states including Missouri, Oklahoma, and Michigan.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has proposed a nationwide moratorium on AI data center construction, told the Times that opposition to Big Tech should be a basic litmus test for any ambitious politician.
“People are standing up and saying, ‘Sorry, we don’t want these data centers in our communities for a number of reasons,’” Sanders said. “If you can’t have the guts to stand up to some large corporation, you should not continue serving in office.”
David Kushner first met Anthony Curcio nearly two decades ago, to tell the story of how Curcio masterminded a $400,000 bank robbery and escaped on an inner tube. His latest on Curcio is every bit as outlandish: After his release from federal prison, Curcio waded deep into the trading card industry, dealing in top-rated Michael Jordan and Nolan Ryan cards and coming under scrutiny for suspected fraud. Curcio contends that the real villain is Collectors Holdings, a private company that owns Professional Sports Authenticator, which evaluates and assigns value to trading cards. A thrilling piece of reporting about authenticity—as an idea, a value, and maybe even a front.
Three months later, on the early morning of May 23, 2024, Curcio was walking through his neighborhood in Redmond. It was quiet — what he called “raccoon hours.” Then he heard cars coming up behind him. FBI agents stormed him, guns drawn; he counted around 20. “What the fuck is this about?” he said. “You’re here for sports cards?” He told them about the judgment he’d just won against Captain Ticket. They said they knew all about it.
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Aug. 19, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
The Teen Pregnancy Prevention program, first authorized through bipartisan legislation in 2009, has been credited with helping to dramatically reduce the number of American teenagers who have experienced unwanted pregnancies in the past decade and a half, dropping by more than 65% over 16 years, according to one congressional report.
Despite the best efforts of President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a federal judge’s ruling on Wednesday sent the message that the push to reduce teen pregnancy in the US will continue, with the administration’s limits on the program’s federal grants paused.
Judge Christopher Cooper of the US District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction in the case of Hennepin County, Minnesota v. US Department of Health and Human Services, in which officials joined King County in Washington state, Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, and the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) in challenging HHS’s changes to the program’s grant policy. The plaintiffs were represented by Public Citizen and Democracy Forward.
The changes, said Cooper, were “likely arbitrary and capricious.”
LAWSUIT WIN: The court blocked the Trump admin’s attempt to turn the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program into an abstinence-only program.
— Public Citizen (@Public_Citizen) August 19, 2026
The court said the plan would seem to defy social reality, common sense, & scientific evidence alike.
A win for young Americans' wellbeing.
The new policy, announced in June, canceled 53 of 66 active grants that had gone to public universities, health departments, and nonprofits for programming related to sex education, including information that was given to teens on contraception and communication with sexual partners.
In Trump’s 2027 budget, the grants are described as promoting “radical leftist ideology,” and officials claim there is no evidence that teen pregnancy prevention programs that go beyond educating young people about abstinence have “contributed to the historic decline in teen pregnancy, which is now at an all-time low.”
Under new guidance issued in June, Teen Pregnancy Prevention (TPP) program grantees are required to focus lessons on abstinence, deemphasize contraception, and teach teens about fertility and “body literacy.”
“HHS is perfectly entitled to formulate its own views about how to stem teen pregnancy—or even whether it is worth preventing at all—and to pursue policy initiatives consistent with its viewpoint. But it is not at liberty, under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), to impose conditions on grant recipients that Congress did not intend or that are unreasonable or unexplained. The preliminary record suggests that HHS has done just that,” wrote Cooper in the ruling.
“Through the TPP, Congress sought to fund a range of evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention strategies, not just abstinence. According to unrebutted record evidence, programs that teach abstinence to the exclusion of all other approaches are ineffective in delaying sexual initiation and reducing adolescent pregnancy, at least as a general matter,” Cooper continued.
The judge took aim at the administration’s promotion of “body literacy,” which he called “a nebulous concept that appears to elevate fertility and marital procreation over well-tested forms of contraception and pregnancy prevention.”
Cooper also suggested that HHS had not bothered to find genuine evidence of its claims about “body literacy,” instead “remarkably” referencing “public health studies that appear either not to exist or not to support the propositions for which they are cited—a hallmark of AI-generated citations.”
The judge stopped short of reinstating the dozens of grants, amounting to about $67 million, that have been terminated, saying it was unclear whether he had the authority to do so.
The plaintiffs and other advocates of comprehensive sex education have called for a permanent injunction; Cooper called on both parties in the case to propose a schedule for next steps by September 1.
Callie Simon, executive director of SIECUS, said the group was “encouraged that the court has halted implementation of the new harmful policy” but emphasized that “the impacts of terminating existing grants remain.”
“Today’s decision sends a clear message that the Trump-Vance administration cannot replace the proven, bipartisan Teen Pregnancy Prevention program with an ideologically driven alternative that harms young people,” said Simon. “Communities across the country are still without the evidence-based programs they relied on, and we will continue fighting to ensure young people have access to the sex education they deserve.”
Sandra J. Valenciano, director and health officer for public health in Seattle and King counties, said local communities were facing a measurable loss due to HHS’ stripping of TPP grants
“This federal action threatened our ability to complete a study on a new science-based, community-informed sex education curriculum specifically for young men and boys,” said Valenciano. “This ruling gives us hope that we may still be able to get to the finish line with this study and ultimately empower more young people to build healthy families if, when, and how they choose.”
Ruth Richardson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood North Central States, said the ruling “reaffirms the value of trusted, evidence-based education programs that help youth make informed choices and plan for their futures.”
“Attacks on the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program not only put young people at risk, they also risk increasing costs for taxpayers,” said Richardson. “No one benefits from these politically motivated attacks. It’s time for them to end.”
You think these greedy crazies would actually do something good for the environment?
© VIEW press
Anita Earls and Sarah Stevens compete for voters' attention and make case for why people should back them in race for NC Supreme Court seat.
Political parties see high stakes in NC Supreme Court election is a story from Carolina Public Press, an award-winning independent newsroom. Our breakthrough journalism shines a light on the critical overlooked and under-reported issues facing North Carolina’s more than 11 million residents. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.
Forget masked robbers, getaway cars, and elaborate bank vaults. Some of the biggest heists of the modern era have required little more than laptops, stolen credentials, clever code, and an understanding of systems holding billions of dollars in digital assets. Cryptocurrency has created a new kind of crime story. Hackers have stolen fortunes without ever […]
The post 10 Cryptocurrency Heists Straight Out of a Hollywood Movie appeared first on Listverse.
Login