President Donald Trump announced "Economic D-Day" against Iran and its allies Wednesday as many debate who controls the Strait of Hormuz.

Evidence Is Clear: CNN Business (Lean Left bias) opinion writer David Goldman said the "focal point of the Iran war" is "the battle for control of the Strait of Hormuz." The article explained that the "competing rhetoric" between Iran and the US has "caused considerable confusion and doubt." However, according to Goldman, "the evidence is clear" showing that "The United States, patrolling the strait with its navy, is gaining ground—and Iran is losing much of its control of the critical waterway." Goldman, as evidence cited Kpler, a service tracking ships via both transponder and satellites, saying that "more than 80% of liquids transits" through the strait over the last two weeks have utilized the Omani route or have been "dark" transits, meaning they turned off their transponders. Head of crude oil analysis at Kpler said "It increasingly looks like Iran has at least partially lost control of the strait." Goldman mentioned Trump saying that the US has "total control over the strait," and asserted that while this is not true, Iran also does not have total control.

'In Price, Is Knowledge': Bloomberg (Center) opinion writer Javier Blas approached the question of control through the lens of oil prices. Referencing an old market saying, "In price, is knowledge," Blas asserted that "At less than $90 a barrel, it isn't screaming shortage." Blas said that while the release of "strategic reserves is helping," as well as China slashing its oil imports, "that's not the full story." The "market skepticism about [US Energy Secretary Chris] Wright's optimism" over the amount of oil flowing through the strait "is understandable" according to Blas, however, "the naysayers are a bit too sure of themselves." Blas said that with "available data, we can safely say that, at the very least, 5 million barrels a day are transiting Hormuz," which contradicts the figures given by Wright. However, when the emphasis, according to Blas is on "available" data which he explained is quite limited due to the ongoing conflict, we may be missing much of what is really happening, positing that oil is flowing through the strait "perhaps more successfully than we think."

3-Month Low:  CNBC (Lean Left) framed coverage around statements from an Iranian government and military backed agency known as the Persian Gulf Strait Authority saying that "Hormuz remains blocked." The article also cited Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi saying the US "has long miscalculated due to intelligence failures," adding "Case in point: The war on Iran. Now, an even bigger miscalculation on the Strait of Hormuz." CNBC said that "While both sides continue to make contradictory claims," data from Kpler shows ship traffic through the waterway at a "3-month low."

RELATED: Trump Says He Will Make Strait of Hormuz US Territory | AllSides

'Notable Success': Outlets like Axios (Lean Left) and The New York Post (Right) highlighted a "stealth operation" from the US that is reportedly guiding millions of barrels of oil daily through the strait near the Omani coast. The Post mentioned that the operation does not come without costs, explaining that the US is "forced to deploy ships, helicopters and planes to intercept attacks from Iran," further explaining that "intercepting the strikes is notably higher than what it costs Iran to attack using its cheaper suicide drones." Axios called the operation "a notable success even as the broader war remains at a stalemate."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

Alexis Antonio Cedillos-Campos, 19, was arrested in connection with the murder of a 42-year-old woman in Fairfax, Virginia. Media outlets on the right emphasized that Cedillos-Campos was an unauthorized immigrant, while outlets on the left tended to downplay it as a factor in the murder.

The Details: Carmen Lizet Puch was found dead on Monday with several stab wounds and "doused in gasoline." Puch and Cedillos-Campos were coworkers at a restaurant and had an "intimate relationship," according to several media reports. Video footage allegedly showed Cedillos-Campos grabbing a knife, black latex gloves and a water bottle before going to meet Puch at a remote area where the two "intended" to convene.

For Context: According to the Department of Homeland Security, Cedillos-Campos was arrested by Customs and Border Protection in 2024 after illegally crossing a border near El Paso, Texas.

How the Media Covered It: The story was covered mostly by local news outlets which emphasized both the nature of Cedillos-Campos' relationship with Puch and his immigration status. 

Previous Immigration Policy: Fox News (Right) and The New York Post (Right) framed the murder as a consequence of Cedillos-Campos's being in the US illegally under the Biden administration's immigration policy. In its headlines and reporting, Fox described Puch as a mother first compared to some other outlets who referred to her as Cedillos-Campos' coworker on first reference.

Fear Campaign: CNN (Lean Left) reported that the case has brought "renewed scrutiny" to the US's immigration policies, and it emphasized that researchers have found "no connection between immigration and crime." The outlet noted other recent instances of crime committed by unauthorized immigrants and said the Trump administration is carrying out a "yearslong campaign to use certain killings as apparent evidence for stricter border enforcement." ABC News (Lean Left) didn't mention Cedillos-Campos' immigration status until the last sentence of its article.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

US national debt surpassed $40 trillion on Tuesday amid federal budget deficits and decades of borrowing.

Shaky Fiscal Foundation: Alan Rappeport, writing for The New York Times Opinion (Left bias) highlighted President Donald Trump's promises to restore fiscal order, saying that "many of his policies have only exacerbated America's financial woes." However, the article also said that it is debatable "whether the mounting debt load is a problem to be solved or a function of America's economic strength." According to Rappeport, "deficits are also a point of political gamesmanship," asserting that "Republicans [are] most passionate about eliminating them when they are out of power." Regardless, Rappeport explained that "both Republicans and Democrats are responsible for America's borrowing burden," adding that the $40 trillion mark is "an ominous milestone for an economy that sits on a shaky fiscal foundation."

'Many Available Solutions': Outlets on the right like Fox Business (Lean Right) were more likely to highlight "surging interest costs" and "growth in federal spending on Social Security and Medicare amid the aging of the U.S. population" as reasons behind the rapidly growing debt. The article cited CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation Michael A. Peterson who said "For the millions concerned about affordability, let's start by asking Washington to take notice that the national debt just hit $40 trillion," and "we must change course." Peterson added, however, that "the only good thing about our fiscal challenge is that there are many available solutions, and the budget is entirely within our control." Peterson also noted that US adversaries "like China, Russia and Iran likely enjoy seeing the country devalue its economic future."

RELATED: National Debt Surpasses GDP for the First Time Since World War II | AllSides

Unsustainable Fiscal Trajectory: The Wall Street Journal (Center) said in an analysis that the $40 trillion "threshold carries symbolic weight, but isn't, by itself, economically significant." The article explained that "most investors and economists care less about raw figures than other measures, like the ratio of debt to gross domestic product, which provides a better sense of an economy's borrowing capacity." The focus of economists, according to the article, is on debt held by the public, which was $32.266 trillion on Tuesday. However, "$40 trillion is a big number," and according to The Journal is "likely to at least briefly draw attention to what economists broadly agree is an unsustainable fiscal trajectory."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

The White House on Monday highlighted the largest drop in prescription drug prices in over 60 years on Monday, saying President Donald Trump "delivered" on his promise to slash prices.

Consumer Price Index: The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the July Consumer Price Index (CPI) report on August 12, showing that prescription drug prices fell 0.8% in July and are down 3.1% from a year ago.

Strong-Armed: Outlets on the right like The New York Post (Right bias) tended to highlight the Trump administration's Most Favored Nation policies, saying the annual decline has taken place as these policies "take hold." According to the article, the "populist president won concessions by threatening Big Pharma with massive tariffs if it didn't move to align its prices with those paid by other major industrialized nations." The article also mentioned that "Trump strong-armed major drugmakers into reducing what they sought from government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid while establishing a new platform called 'TrumpRx' that lists discounts for people without insurance who are paying out of pocket."

Magic Trick: Outlets on the left like The Guardian (Left) and Axios (Lean Left) were more likely to highlight "experts" that claimed the drop in prices were likely a result of former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The Guardian said that Trump, while holding "his hands wide apart as if he had just performed a magic trick," touted that the prices were down "more than at any time over 60 years," but added that the article he held attributed the decrease to Biden.  

Related: TrumpRx Website Adds 600 New Generic Drugs

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

The USS Abraham Lincoln is set to return to the US after nine months, following reports of mental health crises and suicide, as well as poor conditions such as food shortages and water contamination.

The Details: The naval warship departed from a San Diego, California, port in November, carrying roughly 5,500 soldiers. It was originally set to dock in the Pacific, but was rerouted to the Middle East amid the Iran War. The USS George Washington is reportedly on its way from Japan to serve as the ship's replacement.

Administration Response: US Central Command (CENTCOM) lead Adm. Brad Cooper cited "camaraderie, teamwork and resilience" aboard the ship, which he visited on Friday. He argued that many of the reported concerns were old and rectified. "Of the US Navy's 11 active aircraft carriers," he said, "the Lincoln currently has among the lowest number of cases related to mental health. This doesn't mean it is at all perfect. Find any of the nearly 4 million Navy veterans in America today, and they will likely tell you that service at sea for long periods isn't for everyone." President Donald Trump said the deployment was "not nearly long enough," and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the conditions "completely misrepresented."

How The Media Covered It: Outlets across the political spectrum criticized officials' handling of this case. The Guardian (Left bias) and The Wall Street Journal (Center) agreed that Trump "downplay[ed]" concerns about the conditions, and Daily Mail (Lean Right) said Cooper "brushe[d] off" the complaints. Some outlets on the right, however, highlighted other angles. Fox News (Right), for example, emphasized that the ship "has among the Navy's lowest mental health cases" and highlighted Cooper's assertion that the issues have been "resolved."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

Median Strategies, a "polling company" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass publicly referenced during her reelection campaign, has shut down and said that all of its "polls" were counterfeit.

LA Mayoral Race: Median recently published a "poll" that showed the incumbent Bass leading challenger Councilmember Nithya Raman by nearly 12 points. Bass shared the "poll" in a since-deleted post on X and wrote, "Doing the work, showing up, and gaining momentum. Let's do this, LA!" Median claimed the "poll" was based on 560 LA voters between July 30 and August 5 and had a 4.1% margin of error.

LA Times Report: On August 17, The Los Angeles Times (Lean Left bias) said that after "repeated inquiries," Median told it, "Median Strategies was created as a short term social experiment to examine how purported polling information could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification. We are not seeking publicity or attribution for the individuals involved and are declining interviews."

More From Median: Median added on its website, "All previously published polling releases have been withdrawn and should not be cited or treated as genuine polling data." The Times said Median began posting on X on August 9 and had 20 followers. It said no one at the company received any "compensation or financial benefit" and that it was not "funded, commissioned, or directed by any candidate, campaign, political party, PAC, media organization, or other outside entity."

NY Post Fooled: Median also claimed 16% of its LA mayoral "poll" respondents said they voted for Republican Spencer Pratt, and that of them 85% would vote for Bass in the general election. The New York Post (Right) relayed this information in a headline, "Spencer Pratt's voters could be deciding factor in LA mayor showdown according to latest poll." The outlet has since changed its coverage, without an editor's note. The new headline reads, "Karen Bass team demands 'full force of law' over bogus poll," and the story focuses on Median's shuttering and its fraudulent nature. Bass's team told The Times and The Post that the poll was written about by media outlets, legitimizing it in their eyes.

Wisconsin Primary: Median also released a "poll" on the Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial primary, where progressive socialist Rep. Francesca Hong narrowly lost to Milwaukee County executive David Crowley. Median's "poll" showed Hong leading by more than 20 points.

Perspectives: Political consultant Rick Taylor told The Post, "There would have been no reason for anyone to have doubted it. Whoever is responsible for this ought to be exposed, and we need to make sure this never happens again." Journalist Bill Scher noted that on August 11 he expressed skepticism at the legitimacy of Median and wrote, "STOP CITING POLL DATA FROM UNVERIFIED SOURCES."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

President Donald Trump said the US will "substantially reduce" joint military exercises with South Korea, both citing his "very good relationship" with the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un, while also noting that South Korea did not agree to help the US denuclearize Iran. Opinion writers from the left, right, and center criticized Trump's decision.

From the Right: Tom Nichols (Lean Right bias), writing for The Atlantic (Left), argued that Trump is trying to "make South Korea pay" for his humiliation in Iran. Nichols wrote that "Trump and the United States have suffered one embarrassment after another" in the Iran conflict and that scaling back US support for South Korea is "an insane decision." He argued that though Trump fears and respects Russian, Chinese, and North Korean autocratic rulers, Trump "is seeking to assuage the psychic injury of his loss in Iran… by kicking America's allies, the nations he can punish without fear that they will kick him back."

From the Center: An opinion contributor for The Hill (Center) wrote that Trump's actions regarding North Korea vs. Iran are a "paradox." The writer argued that the current conflict with Iran was "undertaken with the mistaken belief that Tehran was about to produce nuclear weapons" and that the danger was "somehow…resurrected" despite the alleged success of Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer during summer 2025. They added that even though North Korea already had nuclear weapons, "nuclear weapons in the hands of an assumed maniac curiously disappeared as a problem and danger." The writer questioned if a "rapprochement" similar to Trump's reconciliation with Kim will be possible between the US and Iran but remains unsure.

From the Left: An analysis from the New York Times (Lean Left) suggested that it "remains unclear" whether North Korea's leader will embrace Trump's gesture and that further rounds of diplomacy between Trump and Kim face "much steeper hurdles," particularly because of North Korea's support from Russia and China and Kim's insistence that the US "abandon its insistence on denuclearization." The deputy director at the Asia Society Policy Institute also told The Times, "Trump's description of the D.P.R.K. as 'unthreatening and respectful' is alarming to allies, who have watched the regime steadily improve its missile and nuclear capabilities, while also gaining an additional patron in Russia for its support in the war on Ukraine."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.