John and Nisha Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute | Rutherford.org
The National Guard was just the beginning.
One year after President Trump deployed military troops to the nation’s capital, we find ourselves navigating a posse comitatus presidency in which the visual trappings of martial law are the norm, not the exception.
When Trump declared a supposed “crime emergency” in Washington, D.C., called in the National Guard, unleashed federal law enforcement throughout the city and temporarily seized control of the Metropolitan Police Department, we warned that the police state had found a new playbook: martial law, one city at a time.
What began in August 2025 as an extraordinary response to a supposedly “extraordinary” crime crisis has become part of the architecture of everyday government.
Thousands of military personnel have remained deployed in the capital. Armed Guard members patrol streets, Metro stations, parks and tourist attractions. They have supported arrest operations. They have responded to medical calls. They have shoveled snow. They have removed trash and weeds and participated in “beautification” projects.
This is how emergency power grabs become entrenched and permanent.
We do not have to speculate about where this leads.
We have already begun to see it.
When Trump federalized California National Guard troops and deployed Marines to Los Angeles during protests against immigration raids in 2025, a federal judge subsequently ruled that the administration had violated the Posse Comitatus Act by using military personnel to carry out civilian law-enforcement functions.
That description increasingly fits the Trump presidency.
Trump is not merely claiming authority as commander-in-chief over America’s military. He is increasingly behaving as though being commander-in-chief makes him commander-in-chief of the American people.
It is a profound, constitutional difference.
A president governs citizens. A commander commands troops. A police chief directs law enforcement. A king commands subjects.
The danger begins when one man starts behaving as though all four offices belong to him.
Trump has increasingly embraced his own digital version of that authoritarian theater.
It would be tempting to dismiss such images as narcissistic internet trolling.
That would be a mistake.
This is how Trump sees presidential power: as authoritarian power backed by military force.
The National Guard deployment in Washington is the physical embodiment of that worldview.
Armed soldiers are stationed around the monuments. They guard the perimeter of the Reflecting Pool. They patrol the National Mall. They appear at Metro stations, tourist sites and public parks.
Their presence is no longer presented as extraordinary. That is precisely the problem.
A free people should never become accustomed to soldiers policing their streets. Once that sight becomes ordinary, the constitutional barrier separating military power from civilian government has already begun to collapse.
And Washington is the ideal laboratory as a testing ground.
What can be normalized in the capital today can be demanded elsewhere tomorrow.
Indeed, we have already seen repeated attempts to expand the model beyond Washington: federalized National Guard troops in Los Angeles, attempted Guard deployments elsewhere, federal agents sent into cities, immigration enforcement increasingly carried out with military equipment and rhetoric, and presidential threats to “liberate” jurisdictions whose elected leaders resist federal policy.
Not every deployment has survived judicial scrutiny.
That is encouraging, but the real danger is larger than whether any particular deployment is eventually blocked by a court. The danger is that the country is being conditioned to accept the premise behind all of them: that whenever the president declares a city dangerous, disorderly, disobedient or insufficiently cooperative, military force is an appropriate instrument of domestic government.
That premise should frighten conservatives and liberals alike.
This is not fundamentally a question of whether you trust Donald Trump. It is whether you trust any president with a standing military force at his disposal for domestic political purposes.
The Constitution was not written on the assumption that good people would always hold power. It was written because power attracts abuse.
Every authority surrendered to Trump becomes an authority available to his successors. Every emergency power normalized now becomes part of the presidential toolbox later. Every constitutional boundary ignored because the “right” president is violating it becomes one less boundary available when the “wrong” president takes office.
This is how republics lose their safeguards: One deployment. One emergency. One executive order. One city. One exception at a time.
The Founders feared standing armies because they understood that military power and political liberty exist in constant tension.
The Posse Comitatus Act reflects that same hard-earned wisdom.
Soldiers defend the country. Police enforce the law. Presidents execute the laws within constitutional limits.
Citizens are not troops. Cities are not battlefields. Political opponents are not enemy combatants. And the president is not the American people’s commander-in-chief. He is commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
That distinction may be one of the few things standing between a constitutional republic and a police state presidency.
We had better remember it before the exception becomes the rule — and the troops never go home.
All government, of course, is against liberty.”~ H.L. Mencken
In all of nature, man is the only living thing that purposely seeks rule and abandons self-governance. I see this as entirely foreign, and completely unnatural. This desire to be ruled, to be coddled, to be told how to act, regulated, and restricted is unique to the human animal. Why is it that the only entity known that is supposedly intellectually superior and has the ability to reason, surrenders independence in favor of dominance by a master? Why is self-responsibility forsaken for a life bound by slavery? Why do people voluntarily vote to choose their commanding ruler, king, and court?
This is a legitimate inquiry, because government, all government, depends completely on force. Government cannot exist without resorting to violence, theft, and murder. Therefore, government is evil, and government is the essence of terrorism against all under its totalitarian thumb. This is why nullification of most all so-called ‘laws’ is absolutely vital, and not just in the courts by juror nullification, but broad-based nullification of all unjust ‘laws,’ which of course are all that exist outside those of natural law.
Government and its henchmen consider any resistance and any individual dissent a crime against the State, this the exact same as Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Mao, and of course now, Trump. This is backward of course, but reliance on propagating threats and fear is necessary by the State, so that a cowardly populace will obey their chosen masters. If a decent sized minority failed to comply with government at any level, that government would fail and fall apart in short order. There is just no way for the few to control hundreds of millions if they simply ignore and fail to acquiesce to this false authority, of which all government certainly qualifies.
This brings us to these current circumstances, all long-planned and now being implemented in order to quell the herd by division and fear. Withholding vital goods by stealth gives the appearance of actual shortages, but all these so-called ‘shortages’ are non-existent. There is no shortage of oil; in fact there are great surpluses, but they are being purposely withheld in order to drive great fear among this seemingly helpless proletariat herd. By intentionally making sure that the Strait of Hormuz and other passageways are blocked, this by the fake war in Iran, done intentionally, energy gluts become real. This of course is also devastating to farming, fertilizers, food production, markets, and causes extreme price inflation, all harmful to the masses only. Who controls the energy, food supply, and money controls the world, as has been posited for decades. Think of this situation as a coup, which is really nothing less than an intended false flag operation meant to bring about total control over all by resetting the monetary system in order to create a global multi-polar technocratic dictatorship.
The only reason all these things are happening is due to the fact that the people at large are not doing anything to stop it. In fact most are doing nothing, except relying on someone else to fix all the problems for them. I am constantly asked the insane question: “What is your solution, and what are you going to do to fix it. This seems to be the way of ‘modern’ man; indifferent, cowardly, dependent, irresponsible, groveling chattel.
This government is in the midst of wars around the world, all led of course by the U.S., Israel, and global technocrats, all working together to advance the same agendas of technocracy. We are constantly surveilled and monitored, monstrous data centers are going up everywhere, our data is captured and analyzed, our food, energy, and water stolen, our currency debased, and inflation is rampant, causing prices to explode. At the same time, AI is being shoved down out throats, biometrics are being mandated, digital ID is being implemented everywhere, ICE goons are targeting innocents nationwide, Flock cameras are going up by the thousands, and speaking out against this heinous government has become a crime, and in many cases has claimed many as targets of the State.
I cannot begin here to describe all of the evil being pursued by the ruling element of the technocratic dark state. Genocide, slaughter, torture, child molestation, depopulation efforts, democide, theft of assets, transhuman experimentation, and assisted ‘suicide,’ even of children. Land theft by government and its corporate partners, weather manipulation, atmospheric spraying of poisonous toxins and metals in the form of chemtrails, toxic ‘vaccines,’ fake pandemics, possible conscription, (slavery) and the list is endless. None of this could happen in a society based upon non-aggression, self-responsibility, self-defense, and true freedom.
As I stated in a few years ago:
The homily of obedience is beaten into the minds of the people by multiple deceptive means, and is an ongoing process that never sleeps. The effort to control societies is based on many methods of promoting service, (subservience) monetary or dependency enticement, nationalism, (worship of State) promotion of collectivism, and especially fear. The basis of this atrocious curse of obedience is psychological warfare against the people. Henry David Thoreau properly stated: “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.”
“Anyone who seeks relief from totalitarian rule by use of any political process or system, is completely lost in a sea of insanity and madness. The epitome of rule lies in obedience and voluntary compliance by those subjects of the State. Those subjects are any and all who believe in, allow, approve, condone, worship, or participate in, any State system or government that survives by a top-down ruling structure. Any rule of one monarch or any oligarchy over any other is absolutely immoral. No politician, no political party, no government, no president, no congress, no ‘democracy,’ no ‘republic,’ or any other insane power and control system, can exist if freedom is to be achieved. Only anarchy, self-rule; of, by, and for the individual, can co-exist with liberty.”
The only way to insure freedom is through the efforts of self-rule and self-governance. If government exists, freedom cannot. It is simply a matter of removing rule at every conceivable juncture, and disallowing any group of maniacal psychopaths to lord over entire populations, regardless of the outright idiocy of any claimed political ‘representation,’ which is just a farce based on propaganda, deception, and lies.
“Why can you not see the manipulation taking place? Why can you not see that you are being treated as a collective horde of tamable animals, instead of thinking individuals? Why can you not see the madness that is the basis of the world today? Why are you so blind to the planned total destruction of all that is natural and good, in favor of designed immoral chaos?“
“Order derived through submission and maintained by terror is not much of a safe guaranty; yet that is the only ‘order’ that governments have ever maintained.”~ Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays
“In the days when hyenas of hate suckle the babes of men, and jackals of hypocrisy pimp their mothers’ broken hearts, may children not look to demons of ignorance for hope.” ~ Aberjhani, The River of Winged Dreams
Yes, the House of ‘Representatives’ have signed and passed through the House the National Defense Authorization Act for 2026. (NDAA) This mislabeled behemoth (3,100 pages) called a ‘defense act,’ a $1.15 trillion dollar monstrosity, is the work of evil, warmongering, profiteering, murdering psychopaths; those politicians and their controlling banking and corporate masters, who hold total power over this governing force. This is an atrocity beyond the scope of the lowly masses, who seem to have given up any and every chance to abolish this state of rule called the U.S. government.
The passage of this act in the House of ‘Representatives,’ those who are supposedly tasked with ‘representing’ and protecting the liberty of the people, is testament to the fact that these worthless slime in Congress, and all other parts of this heinous organized crime syndicate called government, are there only to protect their own interests, and the interests of those funding oligarchical corporate, banking, and Israeli whores who own and control them. The sheer size of this abominable act is astronomical, and likely has not been completely read by any who signed and passed it, in order to hand it off to the repulsive and sickening Senate.
Any who believe that wars against other countries, and especially against the American domestic population will end, have seemingly lost their minds. Trump and his cohorts actually wanted $1.5 trillion dollars to prosecute offensive wars and enhance military expansion, and will likely spend that much or more over the coming year, regardless of any so-called limit of $1.15 trillion. There can always be another ‘emergency,’ the catch-all term for more money, slaughter, and technocratic control.
One of the most horrendous aspects of this insanity is the planned marriage with Zionist Israel and the U.S. I have said for many years that the Israeli and U.S. governments are one and the same, and that they have the same mindset of corruption and murder, acting as partners in demonic genocidal slaughter, and now with this pending NDAA passage, this fact will become obvious to any who can see and think for themselves. I do realize that the number of people able to discern this truth is vastly limited, but when something is this open and sinister, that number would normally increase.
I am posting the entirety of Section 219 of this horrific legislation, (formally Section 224) which is the section concerning turning over the U.S. to the evil State of Israel. I have highlighted a few key passages, but all of it is disturbing. I am including the full text of this section in the hopes that more will actually read it in full. There are few if any limits, and final language that allows for anything considered ‘classified,’ or that would “compromise security” be withheld from the people, and never released. What this open-ended language means is that you will never be told the truth about criminal joint operations.
Trump and Congress, as well as much (most) of the rest of the governing system, are completely owned by Israeli interests, and have succumbed to Netanyahu’s Zionist aspirations, none of which are in the least interest of Americans. This plotted coup is not being hidden because the powers that be think that you, most all of you, will never fight back, or do anything of value to stop this turnover of the country to a soulless genocidal Israel; the same Israel responsible for attacking the USS Liberty, bombing of U.S. interests, and complicity in the 911 [false flag, controlled demolition] attacks, among many other false flag atrocities.
“The trouble is that corruption isn’t something you can have a little of. It’s like cancer; inject it into a political organism and it’s bound to spread. It’s almost an axiom that power that has been taken out of the hands of the people is bound to grow progressively more corrupt.”~ Ross Macdonald, Blue City
The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth.
Look at the faces on your screen. The celebrities, the influencers, the athletes – they aren’t just “aging badly.” Their skin is thinning, their eyes are hollowing, and their bodies are breaking down in ways that can’t be explained by ordinary time. The mainstream answer is to call it stress, menopause, or “bad genetics.” But the real cause behind turbo aging is hidden from the public.
The root cause is the spike protein generated by the mRNA injections. That protein suppresses your body’s ability to repair routine genetic damage, and the result is visible collapse on the outside while the damage compounds on the inside. As I warned in my interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, the forecast was specific: sudden deaths within three to five years, slow kill-off factors extending up to ten years, and “turbo cancers primarily affecting leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer” [1].
Even the World Health Organization’s own cancer agency projects more than 35 million new cancer cases by 2050, yet it “conveniently ignores vaccine-induced turbo cancers among the young” [2]. That omission is not science. It’s suppression. It’s no coincidence this is happening now, in the years after the mass injection campaign. The timeline lines up. We are watching a generation be sacrificed on the altar of pharmaceutical profit, and we are being told to smile and call it aging.
How Spike Protein Silences Your DNA Repair Machinery
Every day, your DNA is struck by tens of thousands of lesions. UV light, environmental toxins, and even normal metabolism constantly break strands and damage bases. To survive, your body relies on overlapping repair systems: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), base excision repair (BER), and nucleotide excision repair (NER). These pathways fix thymine dimers, strand breaks, oxidative damage, and other genetic injuries before they become permanent. These repair systems are not optional. They are the difference between health and disintegration.
The presence of spike protein toxins suppresses these repair mechanisms by 85% - 90%, according to published scientific research. When spike protein interferes with those pathways, mutations get copied into every new cell. That accumulation is exactly what drives accelerated aging, immune collapse, and turbo cancer. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has “identified and documented 40 different ways these vaccines” injure the human body [3]. These are not side effects; they are mechanisms of injury.
And we are injecting these substances directly into the bloodstream, “bypassing all body safety filters, including the skin” [4]. Think about the absurdity: polysorbate 80 is banned in ice cream because regulators don’t want you eating it, yet the same chemical is allowed in vaccines injected into children. When the CDC insists it’s safe, the CDC is lying to you. When those errors are copied into new cells, you don’t just age faster; you accumulate the mutations that become cancer. The predictable result of cells replicating with unrepaired genetic corruption is what we now call turbo aging.
This Was Engineered – and the Nuclear ‘Kill Switch’ Is Next
Make no mistake: this was all engineered, not stumbled upon. From Fauci’s gain-of-function bioweapon pipeline to the Pentagon’s experiments, the spike toxin was deliberately made more toxic and then laundered through the Wuhan lab before it ever went into your arm. The companies behind the mRNA products knew exactly what they were doing. “Moderna and Pfizer sought a court order to conceal clinical data for 75 years, which would have effectively erased our ability to trace any adverse effects back to the original vaccine administration” [5]. You don’t hide data for three generations if you have nothing to hide. The goal was never health; it was turning your body into a spike protein factory for a depopulation agenda.
I believe some of the same forces that handed you the spike protein are now pushing nuclear war. Radiation fallout causes double-strand breaks -- the most dangerous form of DNA damage -- and with repair systems already disabled, fallout becomes a global genetic kill switch. A nuclear exchange would be the ultimate kill switch for a population already carrying disabled repair pathways. This is not abstract fear. “Some Russian leaders are now considering a drastic measure: launching a demonstration nuclear strike to send a powerful message to the West” [6], while the architects of the COVID agenda escalate toward the exact confrontation that would create mass casualties.
If it happens, you will be told the fallout is safe. The ICRP model will be cited. But that model ignores internal alpha emitters like plutonium and uranium, which irradiate your tissues from within. I refuse to accept that lie. You are being set up to be lied to, and the only way to survive is to know exactly how your body repairs itself and what it needs to do that job.
There Is a Way Out: Restoring Your Genetic Blueprint
Here is the good news: your body has a blueprint for repair, and it can be reactivated with nutritional factors, some of which you can grow at home for free. You do not need Big Pharma to save you. This is not about expensive patented drugs; it’s about returning to the natural order.
To repair broken DNA, you need to give your cells the tools they were designed to use. I have spent my career teaching people to “incorporate healthy ingredients like avocados, bananas, turmeric, and even freeze-dried broccoli sprout powder into their diets for maximum potency” [7]. These foods carry the phytonutrients that support DNA integrity and cellular resilience.
This is why I’m producing a free course that lays all of this out -- including how to detoxify and rebuild, even after internal radiation exposure. The same protocols that restore DNA repair and resurrect senescent cells will also protect you from radiological fallout, because the biology is the same. Knowledge is the medicine that cannot be patented. I will announce this free course in the next few weeks at NaturalNews.com
Conclusion: Choose Knowledge Over Compliance
We are being told to accept turbo aging as normal and radiation as safe. But I refuse to repeat those lies. Humanity is worth defending, and the first defense is knowledge. Learn the mechanisms of DNA damage and DNA repair. Grow your own food. Support your mitochondria. And share this information with everyone you care about.
This is not about fear. It’s about freedom. Follow my channel, spread the word, and be ready when the free course launches. The more people who understand what is happening to their bodies, the harder it will be for the empire of lies to survive. Stand up. Prepare. And never stop asking the questions they don’t want you to ask. Choose knowledge over compliance -- and choose life over extermination.
References
Mike Adams. Mike Adams Interview with Sherri Tenpenny - February 28, 2024.
WHO Predicts 35+ Million Cancers by 2050 but Ignores Vaccine-Induced Turbo Cancers in Those Under 30 Years Old. NaturalNews.com. May 09, 2024.
Mike Adams. Mike Adams Interview with Sherri - June 17, 2025.
Injecting Chemicals Is More Dangerous Than Eating Them: Why Is Polysorbate 80 Banned in Ice Cream but Allowed in Vaccines? NaturalNews.com. June 17, 2025.
Mike Adams. Brighteon Broadcast News. Brighteon.com.
Mike Adams. Brighteon Broadcast News - Part Two: Oblivious Western Leaders. Brighteon.com. June 11, 2024.
Mike Adams. Mike Adams Interview with Jonathan Otto - November 18, 2024.
An eclipse of the Sun can easily be demonstrated on a map of a flat, stationary Earth. No spinning of a globe earth or orbiting of a moon far away in space is necessary. There is no need for a distant sun93,000,000 miles away or a distant moon 257,000 miles away, to explain how their relative sizes cause periodic eclipses. Real life, on the real Earth is much simpler than that.
Whilst reading this article, try to temporarily discard any belief that any mention of a flat Earth is just for crazy people. This response is expected in a world where everyone has been conditioned, since birth, to accept the spinning globe model without ever challenging it. Also consider that all real life observations are in fact those experienced from a flat, stationary Earth as opposed to a hypothetical rotating globe.
Before going into details of the coming eclipse, the first thing to consider is that the Sun and the Moon are in fact the same size. Furthermore, they both travel in regular circuits in the sky. Yes, just up there in the sky where you can see them with your own eyes.
The Sun completes a circuit around the flat Earth every twenty-four hours. That is why, like clockwork, you can predict exactly where the Sun will be at a given time. As it travels in a daily circuit, it gradually moves from over the Tropic of Capricorn (21st December – Winter Solstice), arriving at the Equator (21st March – Spring Equinox) then reaches the Tropic of Cancer (21st June – Summer Solstice).
It takes six months to complete this journey between the Tropics. The largest circuit is while travelling overhead in Australia (Tropic of Capricorn), resulting in summer there. The daily circuits then gradually reduce in size until arriving closer to Europe and North America, resulting in summertime while Australia experiences winter. The amazing feature of this journey is that, despite the changes in circumference travelled, the daily circuit is always precisely twenty-four hours. This is just one example of how you cannot truly understand the astonishing wonders of life unless you comprehend the real nature of the Earth on which you live.
Once arriving at the Tropic of Cancer, the Sun then starts the six month return journey back to the Tropic of Capricorn. As its’ circuits increase in size, it becomes visibly lower in the sky. Simultaneously, the weather becomes cooler in America and Europe because the heat of the localised Sun is further away.
What most people don’t know, because they have never been taught the fact, is that the Sun travels slightly faster around the twenty-four hour circuit than the Moon. In fact, from the moment the Sun and Moon are in the same position, it takes twenty-eight days for the Sun to lap and overtake the Moon once more. This process of the Sun travelling faster than the Moon is why we experience the different phases of the Moon.
The 28-day Lunar Cycle:
Overlaid on top of the Gleesons maps below is the relevant position of the Moon at each of the quarter stages of the 28-day Lunar Cycle. The Sun is shown where it is always at Midday (GMT), which is due south from the timezone in London.
In illustration (2), at Midday, seven days after the New Moon, the Sun is a quarter of a circuit in front of the Moon. This is why the right half of the Moon, the part facing the Sun, is illuminated. By observing this in reality, at the same time each day the Moon will appear to be trailing slightly behind the Sun. As each day passes this distance increases. The daily incremental distance is equivalent to a full circle divided by twenty-eight (the number of days in a complete Lunar Cycle).
In illustration (3), at Midday, fourteen days after the New Moon, the Sun will have advanced further around the circuit to be directly opposite the slower Moon. This is when we experience a full Moon.
A week later, shown in illustration (4), the Sun will be three quarters of a circle in front of the Moon. It will therefore appear that the Sun is coming up behind the Moon, hence why the left half of the Moon will be illuminated.
Finally, after twenty-eight days, the Sun finally catches up with the Moon. This is known as the New Moon. It is impossible to see the Moon when the Sun and Moon are alongside each other, except, that is, during a Solar Eclipse. This is when the Moon, with no illumination, appears as a dark object in front of the Sun.
The other important fact that most people do not know is that the Moon travels in circuits between the Tropics every month. This can be proven by regular observations, watching the Moon as it gets higher and lower in the sky during each month. If the Moon is observed gradually getting higher in the sky each day, it is coming closer, travelling towards to Tropic of Cancer. Alternatively, if the Moon is observed getting lower in the sky each day, it is moving further away, circuiting towards the Tropic of Capricorn. A solar eclipse occurs periodically at the precise moment that there is a New Moon, combined with the altitude of the Moon being the same as that of the Sun. This means the Moon must be on a size of circuit almost equal to that of the Sun.
The dates of these periodical occurrences can be predicted centuries in advance. Only by understanding how this plays-out over a flat, stationary Earth, can you truly stand in awe at the wonders of nature.
This amazing spectacle is not occurring millions of miles away in a dark, cold abyss. Rather, it is happening just up there in the day-lit sky, just above your head!
Solar Eclipse 12th August:
For the purpose of this illustration, the daily circuit of the Sun on the 12th August will be drawn where it is in reality, between the Tropic of Cancer and the Equator. The precise location of the Sun at the listed time of the eclipse is known. This is illustrated on the map according to where it is at British Summer Time. It is then very easy to predict where the Moon will be at the listed duration of the full eclipse. The eclipse only lasts for two minutes and twenty-one seconds in the location of the observer. This is the time it takes for the Sun to overtake the Moon from the viewer’s perspective on the gorund.
The way to determine if the Moon will be inside the circuit of the Sun or outside of it can be determined by where the full eclipse will be seen. In this case, the Moon must be inside of the Sun for the eclipse to be witnessed in Siberia, Greenland, Iceland, NE America, and Europe.
Any observer, located at a Longitude further south than the circuit of the Sun, will not see the Moon completely passing in front of the Sun. Why? Because the Moon is on the opposite side of the Sun.
The following text describes the predetermined location and precise time in which the eclipse will occur:
“A total eclipse of the Sun on August 12. The path of totality begins over the Taymyr Peninsula in north-central Siberia and crosses the Arctic Ocean to the north of Servernaya Zemiya, the north-eastern part of Greenland, the north-western coast of Iceland, the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean, northern Spain, and ends over the Balearic Islands.
The partial phase is visible from the Arctic Ocean region, western Europe, the North-Atlantic Ocean, the north-eastern United States, Canada, Alaska and most of the Aleutian Islands.
The eclipse begins at 15h 34m (BST) and ends at 19h 58m (BST); the total phase begins at 16h 58m (BST) and ends at 18h 34m (BST). The maximum duration of totality is 2m 21s”.
The times indicated on the Gleeson Map below are for British Summer Time which is one hour ahead of GMT. This is to indicate the position of the Sun at the times listed for the duration of the eclipse. Because a solar eclipse coincides with the New Moon, drawing a line between the locations experiencing the eclipse and the Sun will give the location of the Moon.
To conclude, please consider the information presented if you are fortunate enough to be in a location where you can experience the eclipse on the 12th August, 2026.
When it comes down to it, the natural world is both amazingly intricate but at the same time, very simple. The Sun periodically lapping and overtaking the same-sized Moon, while at the same altitude, just up there in the sky, is one of the simplest observations anyone can experience. Whether you disagree with this and need a complicated explanation involving distant planetary bodies hurtling across an endless abyss is up to you. The only thing to reflect on is whether the flat Earth reality seems quite logical compared to the spinning globe narrative.
Part I: Technocrats Called for Dictatorship and Technocracy In 1932
Patrick Wood | technocracy.news
In my tattered copy of Henry A. Porter’s Roosevelt and Technocracy (1932), an early reader drew a careful bracket around a single passage on page 72. It reads: “Radical and immediate changes in both our political and economic systems will be necessary.
This can best be accomplished by vesting supreme and emergency power in some one man who has the confidence and respect of a majority of the American people. That man is FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — to whom should be given dictatorial powers in the approaching crisis.”1
It is one thing to know, as a generalization, that respectable Americans flirted with dictatorship in the winter of 1932–33. It is quite another to hold a commercially published book in which the proposition is worked out in numbered steps by a financial analyst, and to see that a contemporary reader found the decisive sentence and marked it. Whether that reader bracketed the passage in alarm or in agreement, the pencil does not say. The ambiguity is fitting, because the country itself had not decided.
Porter is nearly invisible to history, and that is precisely what makes him valuable. His title page bills him as a “Nationally known Economist and Financial Analyst” and lists his other works — Profitless Prosperity, Gentlemen of America, Romance of Natural Gas, Research or Retrogression, America’s Greatest Tragedy — titles that place him not in any university but on the investment-commentary circuit of the day.2
His publisher, the Wetzel Publishing Company of Los Angeles, was a small regional house. I have located no academic appointment, no archive of papers, no obituary of substance. In the ordinary run of intellectual history this would disqualify him from attention. For my purposes it does the opposite. The views of Howard Scott were the views of a movement’s impresario; the views of Columbia’s prestigious engineers were the views of an elite faction. Porter is evidence of something else: how far the technocratic idea had seeped into the commercial milieu — the men who wrote market letters, advised investors, and considered themselves hard-headed realists. When a proposal to abolish constitutional government appears in that literature, dressed in the sober vocabulary of financial analysis, the proposal has ceased to be fringe.
The book’s internal architecture makes the point sharper, because Porter did not begin as a radical. Chapter XII, “What Will Roosevelt Do?”, opens on page 55 with sentiments any Hoover-era financial conservative would have signed: “Many people believe that the government is primarily responsible for prosperity, and likewise for depression, when the fact is that the relations of government to prosperity or depression are negative rather than positive.”
Commerce, he continues, “is carried on by the people without government assistance,” its relations “determined by themselves.”3
This is orthodox laissez-faire, stated as a recognized fact. Seventeen pages later, the same author is demanding a dictatorship. The distance between those two positions — traveled within a single short chapter by a self-described practical man — is, I would argue, the single most instructive thing about the book. The depression had not converted such men to collectivism by argument; it had convinced them that the machinery itself, price system and Congress alike, had failed, and that technocratic rationality was the only thing left standing.
Porter’s method of getting from the one position to the other was prophecy. In a chapter grimly titled “Postponing the Inevitable,” he set out a numbered forecast of the collapse he believed the interregnum winter would bring. Dissolution of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, he wrote, “may be expected to bring about the complete collapse of the stock market,” followed by, among other items: “7. Suspension of stock exchanges. 8. Government ownership of railroads and public utilities in an effort to maintain the solvency of our savings banks and insurance companies. 9. A ‘dole’ for the unemployed.” And then the sequence arrives at its destination: “a national awakening which, overnight, may well be expected to herald the news to every corner of the nation of the inauguration of the ‘new deal’ by 10. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — Dictator.”
Lest anyone mistake the dictatorship for the goal rather than the instrument, Porter closes the chapter: “Drastic as these changes from the present order of things may be, they will serve their purpose if only to pave the way for the Economic Revolution — and TECHNOCRACY.”4 Notice the small typographic fossil embedded there: “new deal” sits in lowercase, inside quotation marks. When Porter wrote, the phrase was still a fresh coinage from Roosevelt’s Chicago acceptance speech of July 1932, not yet the proper name of an era. The book belongs unmistakably to the narrow window between the election and the inauguration, when everything about the incoming administration was still projection.
The page-72 passage the old reader bracketed completes the argument.
“Assuredly Technocracy will come,” Porter writes. “It is plain that its coming will be delayed by political maneuvering and financial chicanery.”
The nation “shall have to pass through a period of Chaos”; its severity “is wholly within the control of the people”; and the way through is the vesting of “supreme and emergency power” in the one man commanding majority confidence.5
Two things are worth stating precisely here. First, Porter was not proposing a coup. His dictatorship seemed self-evident, and in his imagination, temporary — the old Roman logistics model, a magistrate for the emergency, legitimated by “the confidence and respect of a majority.” Second, and more remarkable, the dictatorship is not even the point. It is scaffolding. Congress is to be dismissed and supreme power concentrated so that the technicians can be installed “from top to bottom” and the price system dismantled. Among the era’s many calls for emergency power, this is what makes Porter’s distinctive: he fused the two most electric ideas of that winter — presidential dictatorship and Technocracy — into a single program, each justifying the other.
Dating matters enormously here, and it is a point my research has forced me to insist on: Porter wrote before Technocracy, Inc. existed! The membership organization, with its gray suits, its monad insignia, and Howard Scott’s increasingly wild-eyed pronouncements, was not founded until late 1933.
What Porter knew in 1932 was Technocracy in its first, unorganized incarnation: the public craze. Nobody can call Porter a disciple of Howard Scott.
Walter Rautenstrauch’s Committee on Technocracy at Columbia, formed in the summer of 1932, had lent Scott’s Energy Survey of North America the university’s prestige, and through the last weeks of 1932 the newspapers were saturated with ergs, energy certificates, and the imminent doom of the price system. “Technocracy” in those months was not an organization one joined; it was an idea in the air, unowned and undefined, and precisely because of that, a writer like Porter could pour his own content into the word.6
His Technocracy is not Scott’s in detail — it is a financial analyst’s take on a movement that did not yet have a catechism. The book thus preserves something the later literature obscures: what the technocratic idea looked like during its brief window of mainstream respectability, before it acquired uniforms and became a sect.
Nor was the dictatorship half of Porter’s program eccentric in its moment. The leaderless winter produced an entire literature of respectable authoritarianism. Walter Lippmann, the most influential columnist in the country, told Roosevelt to his face at Warm Springs that he might have “no alternative but to assume dictatorial powers,” and told his readers that the danger was not that Congress would give Roosevelt too much power but that it would give him too little. Eleanor Roosevelt herself remarked that if the crisis demanded it, a benevolent dictator might be the only way through.7
Barron’s, the prestigious weekly of the financial establishment (e.g., Porter’s own tribe), editorialized in February 1933 for “a genial and lighthearted dictator.”8 William Randolph Hearst, the publishing magnate of that day, put the fantasy on film: Gabriel Over the White House, rushed into theaters weeks after the inauguration, shows a president who dissolves Congress and governs as a benevolent strongman, and Hearst intended it as counsel, not satire.9 And when Roosevelt, in the inaugural itself, warned that if Congress failed him he would ask for “broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign enemy,” the line drew the loudest applause of the address — applause that, by her own account, frightened the new First Lady.10 Porter, in other words, was not shouting from the margin. He was saying loudly and systematically what the American center was murmuring.
What of the book’s own reception? After considerable searching, I found that it barely had one, no substantial review in the major press, no evidence of a second printing, no sign that anyone in the incoming administration acknowledged it — and Roosevelt, of course, did not respond to the offer of a crown from a Los Angeles market analyst. The book survives today in a scattering of library copies; the University of California’s copy has been digitized, which is how the text can now be checked against page numbers by anyone.11 Its bibliography entry in the movement’s historiography is a line item, not a discussion. But the obscurity of the artifact should not be mistaken for the marginality of its ideas.
The two halves of Porter’s program — Technocracy and emergency dictatorship — each received a spectacular public verdict within months of publication, and tracing those verdicts is the real reception history of this book.
The Technocracy half collapsed first, and theatrically. On January 13, 1933, Howard Scott, pressed by his Columbia sponsors to answer mounting press skepticism, delivered a nationally broadcast address at the Hotel Pierre in New York that was by every account a rambling disaster. Within days, reporters finished demolishing his credentials — the celebrated engineer had no engineering degree at all — and Columbia cut the Committee on Technocracy loose. By spring, “technocracy” was a vaudeville punchline.
The movement splintered: Harold Loeb’s Continental Committee on Technocracy took the respectable-study route, while Scott regrouped his loyalists and incorporated Technocracy, Inc. in late 1933 — an organizational salvage operation conducted in the wreckage of the craze.6 The consequence for Porter’s book was brutal: within ninety days of the inauguration it had become a fossil. Its title yoked Roosevelt to a word that had passed from front page to punchline in a single season, and no one in 1934 needed a tract urging the president to adopt a discredited fad. But fossils are what stratigraphy is made of. Precisely because Porter wrote before the collapse and before the incorporation, his book records the high-water mark — the moment when a financial analyst could believe, in print, that Technocracy was simply coming, “assuredly,” and that the only question was how much chaos would precede it.
The dictatorship half received its verdict in March 1933, and the verdict was subtler: Roosevelt took the emergency powers and declined the dictatorship. The sequence is worth setting against Porter’s numbered prophecy, because the analyst’s scorecard is better than one might expect. The banking system did collapse; the New York Stock Exchange did suspend trading, closing with the banks in the first week of March — Porter’s item 7, briefly literal. The federal government did assume responsibility for relief within weeks (item 9, in the form of federal emergency relief), and it did go into the utility business on a scale unimaginable in 1932 (item 8, partially, in the Tennessee Valley). The Emergency Banking Act was passed, famously, in hours, by congressmen who in some cases never saw the text they approved — government by acclamation if ever the republic practiced it.12 What never arrived was item 10.
The extraordinary powers of the Hundred Days flowed through Congress, not around it; they were statutory, revocable, and litigated, and when the Supreme Court struck down the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1935, the revocability was demonstrated in the most public way possible.13 Roosevelt governed the emergency with the forms of the Constitution intact — which is, historically, the precise thing that separates what happened in Washington in 1933 from what happened in Berlin the same spring. Porter had predicted the crisis accurately and the constitutional outcome wrongly, and the wrongness is the most reassuring fact in this whole story.
And yet, on a third count — the one nobody was polling — Porter half-won. He had wanted Technocrats appointed “from top to bottom,” and while no Technocrat with a capital T ever ran the government, the type arrived in force. Rexford Tugwell, the most Veblen-marinated of Roosevelt’s Brain Trust, spent the decade being denounced in the press as precisely the technocrat-planner Porter had prayed for. Arthur Morgan’s early Tennessee Valley Authority was as near to a working technate as this country has built — engineers, dams, regional planning, and utopian community-building under one federal charter. The National Recovery Administration’s code apparatus, the Resources Planning Board, the rural electrification engineers: the New Deal absorbed the technocratic impulse so thoroughly that the organized movement suffocated for lack of a grievance.14
This, I think, is the correct frame for Porter’s book in the longer arc I have been tracing from 1932 to 1938: the Technocracy movement failed as a constitutional proposition in the same season it succeeded as a personnel policy. The country refused the dictatorship of the engineers and then, quietly, hired the engineers.
That is why this obscure book repays the attention I have given it. It compresses into ninety-odd pages the entire mechanism by which the technocratic temptation works on practical men: begin with efficiency, proceed through despair of politics, arrive at rule by experts, and treat the constitutional question as a detail of implementation.
Porter traveled that road in seventeen pages, in public, under his own name, with a straight face. His was the sober, business-district version of an idea that was simultaneously being preached in gray flannel by Howard Scott. The road did not close in 1933. It reopens, in politer dress, in every era that loses confidence in its deliberative institutions and finds its engineers still standing; readers may supply their own examples from the present century. Somewhere in 1933 a reader worked through this book, reached page 72, and set a pencil bracket around the sentence offering Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictatorship. The bracket is still there. The question it marks — whether a frightened democracy can borrow the competence of its technicians without surrendering the government to them — is still open, and it is the question my research on these years keeps returning to.
[Part II: Technocrats Call For Dictatorship And Technocracy In 2026 Below Endnotes]
Endnotes
Henry A. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy (Los Angeles: Wetzel Publishing Co., 1932), 72. Capitalization as in the original.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, title page.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 55.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 62–63. The chapter is titled “Postponing the Inevitable”; items 1–6 of the forecast precede the page reproduced here.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 72.
William E. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), which remains the standard account of the Columbia Committee on Technocracy (organized under Walter Rautenstrauch, summer 1932), the press craze of December 1932–January 1933, Howard Scott’s Hotel Pierre address of January 13, 1933, the exposure of his credentials, and the movement’s subsequent splintering into Harold Loeb’s Continental Committee on Technocracy and Scott’s Technocracy, Inc., incorporated in late 1933.
Jonathan Alter, The Defining Moment: FDR’s Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006), on Lippmann’s Warm Springs counsel (“you may have no alternative but to assume dictatorial powers”), his February 1933 columns to the same effect, and Eleanor Roosevelt’s private remarks on the possible necessity of a benevolent dictator.
“A genial and lighthearted dictator”: editorial, Barron’s, February 13, 1933.
Gabriel Over the White House, dir. Gregory La Cava (Cosmopolitan Productions/MGM, 1933); produced with William Randolph Hearst’s financing and script interventions, from the novel Rinehard by Thomas F. Tweed.
Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933. On the applause and Eleanor Roosevelt’s reaction, see Alter, The Defining Moment.
The University of California copy is digitized at HathiTrust (catalog record 006517511), permitting page-level verification: babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b273822.
David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), on the March 1933 bank holiday, the concurrent suspension of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, and the passage of the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933.
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream, on the New Deal’s absorption of the technocratic impulse and the movement’s consequent decline; Kennedy, Freedom from Fear, on Tugwell, the Brain Trust, and the planning agencies. On the early TVA as applied technocracy, see also Arthur Morgan’s own writings and the TVA’s founding statute of May 1933.
Part II: Technocrats Call For Dictatorship And Technocracy In 2026
Patrick Wood | technocracy.news
On my desk are two texts separated by seventy-five years and joined by a single idea. The first is a physical object: Henry A. Porter’s Roosevelt and Technocracy, published by a small Los Angeles house in 1932, in which a self-described “Nationally known Economist and Financial Analyst” urged the incoming president to accept “dictatorial powers in the approaching crisis,” dismiss the machinery of representative government, and install Technocrats from top to bottom.1
The second exists only as archived pixels: Unqualified Reservations, the blog Curtis Yarvin began writing in 2007 under the name Mencius Moldbug, in which a San Francisco software engineer urged Americans to accept that democracy had failed, that the government should be run by a chief executive with the powers of a monarch, and that the officer class of the new regime should be drawn from the people who know how to build things.2
Who cares about Curtis Yarvin? Well, arch-Technocrat Peter Thiel reveres Yarvin as his “house philosopher.” J.D. Vance, as a protégé of Thiel, has repeatedly quoted Yarvin’s ideas over an extended period. Specific Yarvin policies, like RAGE, have been explicitly enacted during the Trump Administration. Yarvin matters!
I have spent years with the first text, and the more time I spend with the second, the more convinced I become that they are the same essay written twice — once in the vocabulary of the engineer, once in the vocabulary of the startup founder.
Some precision about names is required first, because the genealogy is loose in the popular telling. Yarvin did not coin the phrase “Dark Enlightenment”; the British philosopher Nick Land did, in a 2012 essay of that title that described, systematized, and extended what Yarvin had been writing for five years.3 Yarvin’s own name for his school of thought was “neoreaction.” Nor is there any documented organizational pipeline running from Howard Scott’s Technocracy Inc. to Yarvin’s movement; no membership rolls handed down, no succession of institutions. The connection is of the kind I have traced elsewhere between the Technocracy movement and the Cold War defense intellectuals: a continuity of ideas, incubated in the same elite class and reactivated by the same conditions.
The Dark Enlightenment stands to the 1930s Technocracy movement roughly as the Cold War technostructure did — a descendant that would indignantly deny the ancestry, and whose family resemblance is for that reason all the more instructive. It is the recurring conviction that the deliberative institutions are obsolete machinery, and that the people who demonstrably make complex systems work have a superior claim to run the state.
What makes the comparison exact rather than merely suggestive is that both programs converge on the same man. Porter made his offer prospectively: writing in the middle of the winter of 1932–33, he prophesied collapse in numbered steps, culminating in “FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — Dictator,” and argued that supreme and emergency power vested in “some one man who has the confidence and respect of a majority” was the necessary passage to Technocracy.4
Yarvin makes the same argument retrospectively. Across his writing, and as recently as his January 2025 interview with the New York Times, he has held up Roosevelt as his central American precedent: the president who, in Yarvin’s telling, governed as an elected monarch; commanding a compliant Congress, ruling through new agencies staffed by his own people, adored rather than resisted.5 Yarvin does not offer this history as a warning. He offers it as proof of concept.
The presidency, he argues, contains a throne. Roosevelt sat in it. The republic loved him for it. Therefore, the next occupant may sit in it too, this time with a better org chart.
Porter is the prophecy, Yarvin is the application.
Set side by side, the two programs share a complete logical skeleton. Both begin by declaring the existing system not merely failing but already fake. For Porter and the Technocrats, the price system and the Congress that served it were obsolete machinery, kept running past their natural death by “political maneuvering and financial chicanery.”6
For Yarvin, electoral democracy is a facade behind which an unelected consortium of universities, media, and permanent bureaucracy actually governs. He calls this “the Cathedral.” 7 Both then conclude that the remedy is formal, concentrated, personal power: better an open executive than a hidden oligarchy. Both are explicit that the strongman is not the destination but the instrument — scaffolding for the installation of a new administrative class of Technocrats.
Porter wanted his dictator to appoint Technocrats from top to bottom; Yarvin wants his chief executive to retire the entire civil service — his old acronym was RAGE, “Retire All Government Employees” — and restaff the state with founders and engineers.8 And both close with the same soothing clause: Porter’s dictator holds “the confidence and respect of a majority of the American people,” while Yarvin’s monarch answers to a board and can be removed like any failing CEO. In each case the reassurance is hollow, and in each case it is the weakest joint in the structure, for reasons the actual history of the 1930s supplies.
Even the legitimating figure is the same figure, updated for a new economy. In 1932 the engineer stood at the peak of his cultural authority: he had electrified the continent, raised the dams and the skyscrapers, and could plausibly claim to be the one man in American life who demonstrably made things work while the politicians talked.
The Technocracy craze and Porter’s book converted that authority into a political claim. In the 2010s and 2020s the startup founder occupies precisely that position: the builder of platforms and rockets, the one figure who visibly ships while institutions deliberate. Yarvin’s innovation was to convert that authority into a political claim, and his prescription — run the government “like a startup,” with a founder-CEO wielding undivided authority — is Porter’s prescription with the slide rule swapped for the term sheet.
Ninety years apart, the same professional class petitions for the same commission on the same grounds: that competence should replace consent.
The differences are as instructive as the parallels. Scott’s Technocracy was, in its economics, radically anti-capitalist. It proposed to abolish the price system outright and to replace money with energy accounting, which is one reason respectable America could flirt with it only briefly.9
Yarvin inverts the economics completely. His “gov-corp” is capitalism absolutized — the state reimagined as a joint-stock corporation, sovereignty as equity, citizens as customers. Private property should be turned over to the gov-corp to manage.
Technocracy dreamed of rule by a faceless technical committee; Yarvin, whose intellectual debts run to Carlyle rather than Veblen, insists on a person, a sovereign, a name. The temperaments differ accordingly: Technocracy was scientistic and positivist, all charts, surveys, and thermodynamics, while the Dark Enlightenment is literary.
The movements’ social forms differ too — Technocracy was a genuine mass movement, with lecture halls, membership sections, and gray uniforms, where neoreaction was born on a blog and traveled through elite patronage, most prominently Peter Thiel’s.10 And the surrounding weather differs most of all. Porter wrote amid twenty-five percent unemployment and a banking system in genuine collapse; the emergency was not rhetorical. Yarvin writes amid prosperity and polarization, and must therefore manufacture the sense of terminal crisis that 1932 supplied free of charge.
Yet the reception histories rhyme in the way I have come to expect from this material. Porter’s book sank without a review worth finding; within months its title had yoked Roosevelt to a word that had passed from front page to vaudeville punchline, and the book became a fossil.
But the technocratic type was absorbed into the New Deal almost immediately — Tugwell in the Brain Trust, Arthur Morgan on the Tennessee Authority, the planners in a dozen new agencies — so that the idea lost as a constitutional proposition in the very season it won as a personnel policy.
Yarvin’s trajectory inverts the tempo but repeats the shape. His blog was a fringe curiosity for fifteen years, and then the absorption began: a sitting vice president has cited him by name,11 his RAGE proposal was widely recognized as a template for the mass federal workforce removals of 2025,12 and mainstream interviewers now travel to ask him whether democracy is finished.
There remains the historical question on which the whole comparison turns, and here I part company with both of my subjects. Yarvin’s proof-of-concept, like Porter’s prophecy, requires that March 1933 be read as the moment America accepted a monarch. It was not, and the distinction is not trivial — it is the entire point. Offered exactly the crown Porter described, in exactly the crisis he prescribed, Roosevelt took extraordinary powers through Congress rather than over it: statutory, revocable, and litigated.
The stock exchanges closed and reopened; the banking act passed in hours;13 and two years later the Supreme Court struck down the centerpiece of the recovery program in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, and the president — adored, unprecedented, at the height of his mandate — complied.14 The forms held.
I keep returning to the pencil bracket in my copy — the mark some reader of 1933 set around the sentence offering Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictatorship. I once assumed the bracket belonged to a closed chapter, a curiosity from the era my research covers. I no longer believe that. The technocratic temptation is not a chapter but a recurring season: it arrives whenever a confident technical class meets a discouraged democracy, in 1932 wearing the engineer’s gray flannel, in 2012 posting under a pseudonym, and in our own decade briefing statesmen.
Porter and Yarvin, the obscure analyst and the celebrated blogger, mark two visitations of the same scenario, and the question the bracket asks has not changed in ninety years: whether a frightened or merely frustrated republic can borrow the competence of its builders without handing them the government.
Twice now, America’s answer has been to take the builders and refuse the crown. The Dark Enlightenment is, at the bottom line, a wager that the third time will be different.
Porter was an obscure figure rising out of the financial industry in 1932. Yarvin is a pedestrian philosopher who rose from Silicon Valley in the 2010s. It’s the same playbook to create a coup to implement Technocracy. Reject it all.
References
Henry A. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy (Los Angeles: Wetzel Publishing Co., 1932), 72 and title page. Capitalization as in the original.
Curtis Yarvin, writing as Mencius Moldbug, Unqualified Reservations (blog, 2007–2014), archived at unqualified-reservations.org.
Nick Land, “The Dark Enlightenment” (essay serialized online, 2012).
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 62–63 (“Postponing the Inevitable”).
David Marchese, “Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening.” New York Times, The Interview, January 18, 2025 — also the source for the run-the-government-”like a startup” and FDR-as-monarch discussions.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 72.
Mencius Moldbug, “A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations” (2009), where “the Cathedral” receives its fullest exposition.
The RAGE proposal (“Retire All Government Employees”) dates to Yarvin’s 2012 lecture “How to Reboot the US Government”; he revisits it in the Marchese interview, note 5.
William E. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), on the abolition of the price system, energy accounting, and the movement’s organizational forms.
James Pogue, “Inside the New Right, Where Peter Thiel Is Placing His Biggest Bets,” Vanity Fair, April 2022.
JD Vance’s on-the-record citations of Yarvin, beginning with 2021 podcast remarks on mass replacement of the civil service, are documented in, e.g., Ian Ward, “The Seven Thinkers and Groups That Have Shaped JD Vance’s Unusual Worldview,” Politico Magazine, July 2024.
For contemporaneous reporting connecting Yarvin’s program to the incoming administration and the 2025 federal workforce reductions, see Jason Wilson, “He’s Anti-Democracy and Pro-Trump: The Obscure ’Dark Enlightenment’ Blogger Influencing the Next US Administration,” The Guardian, December 21, 2024, and subsequent 2025 coverage.
David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), on the bank holiday, the Emergency Banking Act, and the Hundred Days.
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
See, e.g., the syndicated commentary “The Dubious History of America’s Most Famous Monarchist,” Salt Lake Tribune, January 25, 2025, among the historians’ responses to Yarvin’s readings of FDR and Lincoln.
Dr Anthony Fauci is testifying in front of congress today. Waiting for him, teeth bared, is his nemesis Rand Paul, armed with incriminating e-mails and (allegedly) extracts from Fauci’s personal diary, written between 2019 and 2022.
Familiar names and phrases, like the Wuhan Institute of Virology and “gain of function” are doing the rounds once more.
“It was natural”, say some. “It was a lab accident”, say others. “They released it on purpose,” chorus a third group.
My position – and the OffG position – has been clear for years: [as has Truth11.com]
There was no Covid virus.
It didn’t jump from a bat, or leak from a lab and it wasn’t a bio-weapon, because it never existed.
This is the only logical interpretation of the evidence.
The evidence of fore-knowledge and planning obviously rules out an accident or natural occurrence.
Unless you want to argue that the greatest psy-op of all time – involving actors in every section of civil society at every level of authority in almost every country on Earth – started by accident.
And the refutation of the bio-weapon thesis is a simple question: What’s the point of a bio-weapon that doesn’t do anything?
“Covid” had near-identical death rates to seasonal flu, the majority of “Covid cases” never even had symptoms.
Is this what they spent billions researching?
Is it not more likely the disease was a creation of testing protocols and propaganda?
After all, an entirely fake disease offers total control of your pandemic narrative. It kills who you like, when you like, and stops when you tell it to stop. Your vaccine will definitely work, because it doesn’t have to do anything.
For a full making of this case, read our history of covering the lab leak theory here, here and here. Or Mike Yeadon’s great piecehere.
And as for Fauci, he has been on political death row for a long time. He was christened Covid’s disposable scapegoat almost as soon as the media started treating him like the pandemic’s superhero.
Such is the price of fame.
It’s long been apparent that, should someone need to take the fall for the pandemic, and sate some public thirst for vengeance, it would be the good doctor.
This questioning is part of that process.
It’s a show trial with Fauci doggedly pleading the fifth like a good boy. A WWE event with a scripted loser who has to go up on stage and take a fake beating.
The diary might be real, or it might be the result of a ChatGPT prompt from two days ago, and does it matter much which?
It’s all a grand distraction that, under the guise of accountability, is reinforcing the underpinning lies of the Covid Pandemic.
That’s been the point of the lab-leak theory from the beginning.
Watching the predictable fall of Spain is like watching a horrific train wreck that you can’t turn away from, and it’s all thanks to the socialist government there. Terrifying images of thousands of Muslim migrants overrunning the coastal city of Ceuta hit social media on Thursday, and this isn’t the first time the borders of Spain have been breached.
Allahu Akbar Spain!
Muslim "enrichers" chanted pro-Hamas slogans and waved photos of Saddam Hussein in front of the Puerta del Sol.
Much of Spain was ruled by Muslim conquerors from 711 to 1492; Muslims believe that the territories they lost during the Spanish Reconquista still…pic.twitter.com/mi1uqQ6Bx4
Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has actively welcomed the invasion and is refusing to deploy the military. The people there are on the verge of a revolt. The country is swarming with young Muslim men conquering its streets with almost no resistance.
This takes me back to Del Rio, TX in 2021 w/ the Haitian surge. Similar images.
This is what the DSA/socialist platform looks like in practice – in another country. No borders. No immigration enforcement. Complete freedom of movement without any resistance from the government.https://t.co/zTAMql2YGl
Fox News reporter Bill Melugin commented on the horde of Muslim militants storming Ceuta.
“This takes me back to Del Rio, TX in 2021 w/ the Haitian surge. Similar images,” he remarked, although the images seen today look far worse.
“This is what the DSA/socialist platform looks like in practice – in another country,” he correctly noted. “No borders. No immigration enforcement. Complete freedom of movement without any resistance from the government.”
“The videos coming out of Ceuta, Spain are insane,” Melugin stated. “Thousands of Moroccans and Algerians breaching and overrunning the Spanish border.”
“AP reports the city has asked Madrid to declare a national emergency. Search ‘Spain Ceuta’ on X if you haven’t seen the images yet,” he added.
According to the Associated Press, thousands of migrants poured into Ceuta from Morocco on Thursday. The helpful Spanish government even opened the gates for them. Local officials begged the prime minister to declare a national emergency and send the army to restore the border. Their pleas fell on deaf ears.
A Guardia Civil spokesperson reported that the migrants were “massively entering from the sea” through the Tarajal breakwater but could not provide any estimates for the numbers.
From the AP:
Spain’s interior ministry said it would guarantee the safety of citizens and the integrity of the nation’s border, but that the government could not declare a national emergency over migration concerns.
Video footage showed crowds of people, mainly Moroccans, walking around the breakwaters at Tarajal beach onto local roads. While the majority appeared to be young men, there were also families with women and children. “Viva España!” some shouted to a freelance photographer working for The Associated Press.
The AP report notes this isn’t the first time that the city has been flooded with migrants. The scenes of people streaming across the frontier recall the border crisis of May 2021 when more than 8,000 migrants poured into Ceuta in just two days.
Naturally, the AP is underreporting the numbers there. They always do. And notice that no major media source is calling the invaders what they are… Muslims.
Calls for the Military Fall on Deaf Socialist Ears
Juan Jesús Vivas, the head of Ceuta’s regional government, called for the country’s government to declare a national emergency on grounds of national security. He literally pleaded for more police and for the army to be deployed to the border. He was ignored.
BREAKING: An estimated 2,000 to 3,000 migrants cross into Spain’s Ceuta from Morocco, overwhelming police & prompting calls to deploy the army.
Vivas asserted that the additional police and soldiers are necessary “to guarantee the inviolability of the frontier and citizen safety.”
No kidding. Hide the women and children.
BREAKING:
The government of Ceuta has released a video asking Spain to declare a state of emergency, deploy the army to the enclave, and fully close the borders.
Sánchez deliberately ignored their requests and warnings about the coming invasion, leaving them no choice but to…pic.twitter.com/7TuzQveY0z
Conservative opposition People’s Party leader Alberto Nuñez Feijoo posted on X, “The situation in Ceuta is desperate. The government cannot look the other way… because we are facing a national security crisis.”
Unfortunately, the socialists not only don’t care… they welcome their new overlords.
Spain's socialist Prime Minister announced he would be giving amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.
Now, his country is being invaded by hordes of military aged men from Africa.
Because that's what happens every single time a politician offers amnesty.
“The situation is absolute chaos,” said Rachid Sbihi, who is the head of the association that represents Guardia Civil officers in Ceuta, according to The Guardian. “It’s not possible to give precise numbers, but there are thousands of migrants crossing.” He added that the border had “totally collapsed.”
The Guardian is also reporting that Santiago Abascal, who leads the far-right Vox party, described the incident as an “invasion” and declared that those crossing into Ceuta were not fleeing war or poverty but had been summoned by Sánchez’s government to ensure he could remain in power. That is likely spot on.
¡SOS Ceuta!
No vienen huyendo de ninguna guerra, ni de la pobreza. Es una invasión. Son hombres en edad militar llamados por el Gobierno corrupto de Sánchez para que asalten nuestras fronteras para que después deambulen por las calles de España diciendo "Viva Pedro Sánchez".…pic.twitter.com/Vuk2PeSIsb
Asalto masivo en Ceuta. Anunciado. Un solo responsable: Sánchez. Cómplices: muchos, un listado interminable. Victimas: los ceutíes y por extensión todos los españoles. El silencio de las élites dirigentes será estruendoso.@vonderleyeny@NadiaCalvinoseguirán soltándoles pasta.pic.twitter.com/0RRwKpBspN
The Spineless Socialist Prime Minister Lies and Deflects
Socialist prime minister Pedro Sánchez wrote a stunning post on X worthy of a eunuch:
The Government of Spain is fully committed to providing an immediate response to the situation in Ceuta.
We are mobilizing all necessary resources, working with Moroccan and international authorities, and preparing the necessary measures to restore normalcy as soon as possible. I just conveyed this to President Juan Vivas Lara.
This is the moment to build solutions, with responsibility and cooperation.
El Gobierno de España está volcado en dar una respuesta inmediata a la situación en Ceuta.
Estamos movilizando todos los recursos necesarios, trabajando con las autoridades marroquíes e internacionales, y preparando las medidas necesarias para recuperar la normalidad lo antes…
Sánchez es un traidor, un corrupto y un indecente. Actúa como el enemigo del pueblo español. La emergencia nacional solo puede resolverse echándole y sentándole en el banquillo.#Ceutapic.twitter.com/yLicTcD6hU
In July, Spain’s Supreme Court ruled that migrants intercepted at sea while attempting to reach Ceuta or Melilla cannot be summarily returned under the enclaves’ special border-rejection regime.
No wonder the PSOE (Pedro Sanchez’s Socialist Party) is at historic lows in Spain’s legislature. The party is rocking 26-27 percent in the polls. It’s not just the horror of being overrun by Muslim hordes; it’s been one corruption scandal after another since he’s been in office. Spaniards are hopeful he will get the boot by the end of the year, but the damage is already done.
'Is It Hate to Say That Africa Doesn’t Fit in Europe or That Spain Should Remain Spanish' – Vox Party’s Rocío de Meer
“It’s a lie that they are refugees fleeing from wars,” Rocío de Meer stated. “What war is there in Algeria? What war is there in Morocco?…pic.twitter.com/qYX26gQVgD
Many local shops were shuttered. Enrique Serrano, who runs a women’s clothing store in central Ceuta, told Reuters business owners were organizing themselves to protect their property and families in case of possible disturbances as they believed police resources would be insufficient.
“I’m not opening this afternoon because the situation is extremely tense… The first thing I have to do is protect my business and my family,” he said, adding that when the fence was breached after midnight, hundreds of migrants rushed through in a matter of minutes.
Bombshell Report from Islamized Spain
Moroccan Migrant Rape Gangs Turn Peaceful Spanish Paradise Manilva Into Narco-Rape Hell – Media & Authorities Stay Silent
Once a daytime paradise on the Costa del Sol, Manilva has become the new epicenter of drug trafficking and…pic.twitter.com/p4fATJKEXV
Ceuta, together with Melilla, another Spanish autonomous city located in North Africa, represents the European Union’s only land border with Africa. Both cities periodically experience surges in attempted crossings by migrants seeking to reach Europe. The last one in 2021 for Ceuta saw at least 10,000 Moroccan and sub-Saharan Muslim migrants swarm in.
BREAKING: Ceuta, Spain BORDERS HAVE OFFICIALLY "COLLAPSED"
"These people are coming in without any obstruction. Spain has a very left-wing government. They did amnesty for 1M+ aliens living in the country…that's what we call a PULL FACTOR."
VOX Deputy Rocío de Meer Sounds Alarm on Spain's Islamization in the Shadow of a New Mega Mosque
“Over the past thirty years, the Muslim population in our country has multiplied tenfold. The demographic and cultural changes we…pic.twitter.com/ggb61aTfXx
Images showed some of the migrants shouting “Long live Spain” as they charged over the border or out of the sea. That’s not a yell of patriotism… that’s a shout of conquest.
More than 100,000 migrants have entered Spain in the last 12 hours. The number could double by tomorrow.
All the Maghreb countries have organized a coordinated operation for several days.
Prisons have been emptied and their criminals sent over here to wage jihad in the coming weeks and months. The Spanish government must be arrested, tried, and sentenced to the harshest punishments.
The military received orders from Pedro Sanchez to let the migrants in and are just extras watching the scene.
Among them several thousand prisoners including jihadists, rapists and criminals released from prisons a few weeks ago by King Mohammed VI.
Several migrants say they’re ready to join France and the United Kingdom to wage jihad there, several have also claimed in front of the cameras that they were released from prison yesterday.
Army told to observe and let them in
Barcelona Spain Adding Razor Wire Defence To Homes
Whatever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me? And what about the ability to call it how it is? To call someone on their shit or make a joke and saying "fuck em if they can't take one"?
These are time tested checks and balances to stop the insane bullshit some weak people get caught up in, to their, and others detriment.
The title above is three phrases I personally have stated many times and a philosophy that fits well with my focus on the truth.
Zero Tolerance For Bullshit
Don't give them an inch, because they will take a mile. A well known and practiced saying that has been forgotten by the mob. Or another way I have always put it; I have a zero tolerance for bullshit. I don't accept any, not even a bit. Never have. It has served me well. Many people did not like it but in the end the truth needs to be told and if you don't accept anyones bullshit for a second it immediately shuts it down, rather than enabling their crap.
Today, the insane woke and the Borg jabbed bluetooth implanted masses linked to the hive mind have long forgotten these types of sayings. They have vanished along with the balls of the majority. The checks and balances have been eliminated and the insane are running amok.
For me these sayings have not been lost. I don't hate anyone. I have a passion for the truth and call it how it is. If someone is not speaking the truth, or spewing some bullshit garbage or takes offence to a joke about anything then my responses are still the same: "I have a zero tolerance for bullshit, bollocks cunt (fuck no), or fuck you if you can't take a joke".
This is not a crime, as much as the government and their conformist cheer leaders want it to be. We as humans can laugh at each others differences, we can call out each other on anything that violates natural law, or on our bullshit, and we can leave things as agreeing to disagree. We also don't have to apologize for having an opinion.
The masses are forgetting this due to being brainwashed into thinking it is ok to police speech. It is not. It never will be.
The totalitarian horde and the compliant Karens do not have the right to silence the truth. They do not have the right to fine someone or give them community service for using a word either. Any word.
The recent trial and prosecution of Shiloh Hendrix is an example of this madness. Genocidal manics are not being charged for mass murder due to their wars and poison bioweapon injections, yet someone who uses a word is punished. Pathetic.
The Shiloh Hendrix conviction should be overturned as should others like it, such as the people in England being arrested for social media comments. We should not accept these attacks on free speech.
Our political elite (scum) who fuck, murder and eat kids don't care about us calling each other names. They don't care about us at all. They are using hate speech as an excuse to silence the truth. Don't let them. Call it how it is. Do not comply.
We should be talking about the government’s growing network of detention centers and its family-separation policies, which have resulted in an estimated 145,000 American children experiencing the detention of at least one parent — including more than 22,000 U.S.-citizen children whose entire household of co-resident parents has been detained.
We should be talking about masked government agents, endless war, disappearing constitutional safeguards and an imperial presidency accountable to no one.
Every day — sometimes every hour — brings another outrage, another threat, another vulgar display of power, another self-glorifying meme, another political provocation and another distraction demanding our attention.
Before we can fully comprehend one assault on the Republic, another takes its place.
That is not merely the chaos surrounding this government.
It is one of the ways this government maintains power.
Keep the public angry, exhausted, frightened and distracted. Force everyone to chase the latest outrage. Crowd out serious scrutiny with political theater. Then push past another constitutional boundary while no one is able to keep track of what has already been lost.
This is how every crisis appears fleeting and every constitutional violation merely the latest controversy in an endless political spectacle.
Taken together, however, these are not isolated events.
They are tests.
Donald Trump is not defending the Constitution. He is testing how much of it he can violate before anyone stops him.
He is testing whether a president can wage war without Congress. He is testing whether federal power can be turned into personal power. He is testing whether dissent can be punished without formally outlawing speech. He is testing whether masked government agents can operate as a secret police force beyond public scrutiny and constitutional accountability. He is testing whether the government can watch, track and profile everyone without meaningful limits. He is testing whether the Twenty-Second Amendment, which limits a president to two terms in office, means what it says.
Most of all, he is testing how much abuse the American people will tolerate before exhaustion, fear, distraction and partisan loyalty wear down their willingness to resist.
That is the real constitutional crisis confronting America.
Trump has turned constitutional government into a continuous test of submission: He pushes beyond a boundary and waits. Will Congress resist? Will the courts intervene? Will government officials refuse? Will the public object? Or will everyone retreat, rationalize, delay and adjust?
If no one stops him, the violation becomes precedent. Then he pushes farther.
This is how a republic is dismantled — not necessarily through one dramatic declaration of dictatorship, but through a succession of constitutional violations that go unanswered long enough to become the new normal.
The administration’s approach to war offers a revealing glimpse into the instincts driving much of its conduct.
Asked about Iran’s promise to retaliate according to the principle of “an eye for an eye,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Trump’s policy is “a head for an eye.”
Not proportionality. Not restraint. Vengeance to the maximum.
The impulse behind that doctrine — to retaliate when challenged, punish when criticized, escalate when restrained and push harder when the law says no — is not confined to the battlefield. It runs through the administration’s approach to political opponents, dissent, immigration enforcement, executive power and constitutional limits.
“A head for an eye” may be Trump’s philosophy of war, but it is also a warning about the kind of government that philosophy produces. The result is a government at war not only with foreign enemies but with dissent, privacy, due process, constitutional limits — and ultimately with the American people.
Meanwhile, as the administration tests how much damage it can inflict and how many boundaries it can cross without consequences, the public is being overwhelmed by a relentless barrage of noise, spectacle and manufactured outrage.
And the costs of the government’s recklessness continue to mount.
The war with Iran continues to consume lives, military resources and tens of billions of taxpayer dollars.
This is what government without constitutional limits looks like: war without accountability, policing without transparency, surveillance without warrants, propaganda without shame and power without restraint.
The question is no longer whether the Constitution is welcome in America. The question is whether the government still considers the Constitution binding at all.
By all indications, the answer is no.
Trump will keep testing the limits of the Constitution until someone stops him.
Unfortunately, Congress has largely abandoned its duty to check presidential power. The courts increasingly allow constitutional controversies to be resolved through delays, procedural maneuvers and doctrines that shield government officials from accountability. Federal agencies resist transparency, police investigate themselves, and private contractors help the government evade constitutional limits.
And the American people are encouraged to treat every abuse as a partisan question rather than a constitutional one.
...done so as to usher in a new internet. Cancel the old one and launch a new one, one that automatically verifies digital ID and supports the tokenization of everything, under the guise of, ‘well, the old internet has been corrupted by AIs so it is no longer fit for task, and neither do businesses want to advertise to fake people, so we need to start fresh with a more secure, immutable internet.’
Dead Internet: Over 40% Of LinkedIn Posts Are AI, As 'Agentic AI Activity Is Driving A Lot Of Browser Activity'
The WinePress | substack.com/@thewinepress
Rudy Yang, a financial tech analyst at Pitchbook, told Fortune: “Agentic AI activity is driving a lot of the browser activity you’re seeing.”
The dead internet theory is no longer a theory, it is dead internet fact. The WinePress has covered in a number of reports that so much internet activity and content nowadays is driven by or is AI-generated.
A recent report found that LinkedIn is currently the platform saturated the most with AI content.
AI detection platform Pangram reported earlier this month that 40.5% of content on LinkedIn was AI, followed by Medium (a platform to write and share blogposts, similar to Substack) at 30%, X (formerly Twitter) at 24%, and Substack at 10%. A percentage of other posts and content on these platforms have both AI and human-generated content as well.
The researchers at Pangram added:
LinkedIn had the highest AI share of any platform across the board. LinkedIn posts made up a third of scanned items, yet it accounted for nearly two-thirds (62%) of all AI content we flagged. Contrary to what one might expect, people are overwhelmingly willing to use AI to speak on their behalf in professional settings that are associated with their real identity, and less likely to use it on casual and anonymous platforms.
LinkedIn also encourages AI use on its platform in several ways, including a built-in “Write with AI” button (now rebranded “Enhance post,” but still offering AI writing assistance). People are noticing LinkedIn’s growing reputation for slop – perhaps to combat it, an executive at LinkedIn recently announcedthat the platform would be detecting and downranking AI-generated posts using an in-house algorithm; ironically, the announcement was itself AI-generated. Whether or not the company is attempting to modulate AI in their feed, our users are still seeing a lot of AI writing on LinkedIn.
AI writing is now a problem everywhere on social media. This is concerning, but it’s in line with what we’re seeing elsewhere online: researchers estimatedthat 35% of newly published websites on the open internet were AI-generated or AI-assisted. An internet that is completely flooded with undisclosed AI content is bleak, but we don’t believe it’s inevitable. We hope that by providing transparency to AI-generated content online, we can give internet users back some control of how they spend their attention.
The studies and reviews continue to pour in: the internet is being dominated by AI, and it will only get worse.
Fortune did a roundup of the latest data on the makeup of internet traffic, and most of it points to humans now being a quaint minority.
“There’s a lot of missing pieces of information, but a lot of the observed data suggests the same thing, which is like there is more bot activity,” Rudy Yang, a financial tech analyst at Pitchbook, told Fortune. “Agentic AI activity is driving a lot of the browser activity you’re seeing.”
“They consume the web completely differently than humans do,” Yang told Fortune. “It’s almost like an entire new category, customer category, was created, and it means a lot for businesses because no one, as a business owner, is going to want to silo themselves from being able to serve a completely new customer segment.”
They’re also changing what we see on the web, too. A report published in October from the SEO firm Graphite found that over half of all new English-language articles on the internetwere written with AI.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
As I said, it’s not a theory anymore, it’s a fact. The internet is dead; and I personally think that there is even more AI content presently than these firms are able to detect.
Now we definitely know why there are so many “ghost jobs” and fake job applications on LinkedIn…
The problem also largely rests on the fact that so many businesses and people simply do not care that they proliferate AI content themselves. In a very short amount of time a lot of people have become addicted to AI or have been quite tolerable enough to it.
Job 32:8 But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.
God has inspired us with the ability to create and understand, and to have our own inspiration. AI removes all of that; and we are seeing it with how everything has become so dead and lifeless.
I have said before that the time is rapidly approaching when we will have to simply walk away from the internet, within our reasonable capacity, because it has become totally fake and will only get worse, and by extension further erode our minds.
However, not only is this by design, I believe that it is being done so as to usher in a new internet. Cancel the old one and launch a new one, one that automatically verifies digital ID and supports the tokenization of everything, under the guise of, ‘well, the old internet has been corrupted by AIs so it is no longer fit for task, and neither do businesses want to advertise to fake people, so we need to start fresh with a more secure, immutable internet.’
“Representative government is artifice, a political myth, designed to conceal from the masses the dominance of a self-selected, self-perpetuating, and self-serving traditional ruling class.” ~ Giuseppe Prezzolini
It is time to put to bed any idea whatsoever that what is called ‘America’ is some sort of free and democratic country. It is not any such thing, and is completely run and controlled by the ‘private’ Federal Reserve Bank, domestic and global international banking and finance organizations, and ruling oligarchs who entirely control all politicians who can only act as pawns of the real power that wields absolute dominance over this failing empire. In other words, right and left are one and the same and can only act in concert to satisfy the real ruling class. There is no representation of the people, and outside interests, mostly unseen, are pulling all the strings of power in finance, technology, and the military industrial complex. This is the way of government and governance, all government.
This leads to some hard truths that have never been accepted by this indentured serf ‘citizenry.’ The core of this problem is multi-faceted, but lies mainly in the fact that every generation has been indoctrinated from birth to believe in reverence for ‘country’ through abominable nationalistic worship of State. Public (government) schools play a huge part in this extremely intense propagandizing of false ‘patriotism.’ It is all a ruse set up intentionally by those who literally run this so-called ‘nation-state.’ If real history, not what is taught in schools, or propagandized by the political class and media, were known, the people would likely never have succumbed to their own slavery without so much as even minor resistance. In fact, it has been almost the opposite attitude, which is exuberant support of nationalistic power.
The acceptance by the masses for worthless government decrees, such as declarations, blood-soaked flags, so-called ‘founding’ documents, and constitutions, is testament to a mentality based upon reliance on rulers and masters to allow partial freedoms in order to have the ability to close all windows to any individual sovereignty. Any belief in government doctrine claiming to define ‘rights’ is simply an admission that the State is the decider of those rights, not inherent natural law. The beginning and end of freedom rests in any belief that governments have any right to rule. They do not have any legitimate right to rule over any other, period. One must remember that politicians, those bought and paid for whores of the claimed oligarchs, are simply people like everybody else, nothing special, who automatically become obedient to the real power in order to retain their status, illegal wealth-building capabilities, and positions in government. They are literally the worst of mankind.
This has now become a multi-polarized world, and all geopolitics are centered around a new world order consistent with different regional technates of power, dependent on a centralized joint technocratic ruling system. The U.S. or what will become the North American Technate, will likely be a major player in this system, but probably not the head, as the power structure is changing dramatically as this technocratic oligarchy goes forward. The U.S. is debt-ridden beyond imagination, has lost (intentionally orchestrated) most all its manufacturing capabilities, and cannot build these back without full cooperation over a long period of time with China, which may become the newest world empire. The Middle East situation is very telling of this shift in power, especially when considering capital growth and the cooperative nature happening in East and West Asia. The so-called ‘nation-state’ of America is losing its control over world events, and will become a regional player only, and not the dominate the controlling hegemon that has existed for over the past century.
None of this could happen without the age old strategy of divide and conquer. In this country, ‘democrats’ and ‘republicans,’ one and the same, are more divided than ever before, racial division is rampant, each segment of this melting pot called America hate each other, men and women are growing further apart by the moment, and family growth has declined to a level that cannot sustain itself. Everybody hates white people, even certain whites, and all immigrants are seen as criminal, which in a country made up of all immigrants or the children of immigrants, seems rather alien; no pun intended. Then there are the transgenders, homosexuals, and all other multi-letter groups; a purposely induced psyop, that has divided this ‘country’ even more. And the list continues to grow, as the division expands continuously, meaning that control over the people at large has become vastly easier to handle, as hate is the dominant mindset of American society. Little do the general masses understand about their own stupidity, for allowing the ruling sector to separate and divide nearly the entirety of this population, which has led to what will soon become a national plantation of slavery, where this once empire will have been replaced by a new empirical order.
In the midst of all this chaos, the general population continues to be used, abused, stolen from, sickened, and murdered due to government (State) policies, wars, debt, and spending to sustain forever conflicts; none of which are legitimate. All war debts are transferred to the people, and all war profits , which are gargantuan, are kept by the oligarchs and their financial conglomerates. None of the debt that exists, which is incredibly more than is stated, will ever be paid or reduced by the State, but will always be transferred to the common citizenry. Of course, this means gross inflation of the ‘money’ supply, which leads to price inflation that is unbearable. This is already evident, but will get much worse.
It is imperative to understand that all going on in this ‘country’ and beyond, are Ponzi schemes based on capital transfer. Most everything is dependent on deception, lies, theft, and perpetual wars; although most every war is not a real war based on defense from attack, it is plotted constant war to bring about more control and money exchange from the common people to the few rich oligarchs. This could not be more evident than it is in the U.S., where the very rich own and control almost all the wealth. Only a small handful of companies in U.S. markets make up about 50% of the entire markets, and most of those particular companies were built, funded, and controlled by the Pentagon, CIA, and DARPA. They were and are given massive contracts, sustained, and monetized to gain market dominance. This is a completely rigged market system, and can only function through grift, fraud, manipulation, and fascist policies.
The main point of this short essay is that America is not what it is made out to be, and never has it been. More freedom existed in the distant past, but that is only because the technology necessary to control large areas and millions of people spread across huge territory did not exist. The framework to turn this ‘country’ into what it is today, has been in place for most of its history, but not with advanced control capabilities, mass surveillance, private/corporate partnerships, and full collusion between finance, technology, and military complexes; complexes whose intent is to control all, so the writing is on the wall. The result without mass resistance, is a fully controlled State, a fully controlled population, whose future is one of poverty and dependence for most.
What should be taken to heart is that government is technically irrelevant where power and control are concerned. The financial owners of this world, the Federal Reserve and central banks, the hedge funds, Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street, among other banking and finance giants, own, control, and are high above government. Politicians, regardless of who they are, are never any real power source, as they are but pawns of the massive financial system; controlled puppets at best. They are however, the conduit between the real power and the people, so as long as the people support and use this system, relying on the evil political class to save them, the opposite will occur.
The bottom line then, is to eliminate this governing system, which would make impotent those few who now rule the world. Without the government as their middleman, who seemingly control the rest of society, the oligarchs would lose their control over the masses. The way to accomplish this is to band together as individuals, and disregard all rule and government at every possible turn, disobeying their mandates, not complying with their heinous laws, and disengaging with this abominable system, especially the monetary system.
In my opinion, there is no other solution, as political solutions in this evil system of corruption, are not viable at any level, and can only exacerbate any effort to regain freedom.
“We are in a prison of our own minds holding our own chains around us. We create our oligarchs and fight for their right to oppress us.” ~ Heather Marsh, Binding Chaos
Digital-programmable pricing along with real-time continuous surveillance
Leo Hohmann | leohohmann.substack.com
Gasoline prices, as I’m sure you’ve noticed, routinely change, sometimes in a matter of hours given the instability of the oil supply as arbitrarily judged by global futures markets.
It’s like every gas station gets a memo at the same time to raise their prices by the same amount.
This is digital pricing as it relates to just-in-time inventory schemes.
But what if digital pricing is invading all of our retail purchases, starting with the nation’s two largest grocery-store chains – Walmart and Kroger?
Get ready, because that’s exactly what is in the works.
Walmart is now capable of setting the price of every one of its tens of thousands of store items to match the highest price a specific customer is willing and able to pay.
Based on its data collection and the ability of its many in-store cameras to read customers’ emotions, Walmart, with the help of AI, knows whether or not a specific customer can afford to purchase any specific item in its storewide system. It uses personal data on each customer culled from various sources and in-store cameras that spy continuously on every shopper. These cameras pick up your facial expressions, note whether you hesitate or pause before putting an item in your cart or back on the shelf; they note how well you are dressed; what kind of car you drive; estimate your net worth, etc. This, combined with your past buying habits, allows Walmart to fix a price tailored specifically to your ability to pay.
Welcome to digital/programmable pricing. It can change in a minute based on how you present yourself to Walmart’s cameras.
This may seem eerily similar to the Chinese Communist Party’s social credit scoring system, which has been in place for the past few years. Walmart and Kroger are preparing to bring this system to America by the end of the year, and many of their competitors are likely to follow suit after they see how well it works to boost profits.
Walmart’s commitment to programmable-digital pricing is a striking example of the risk of public-private partnerships involving AI, and the betrayal of the federal government sharing data with corporations, which can then enforce government policy and prerogatives while parlaying the data into fatter profit margins.
If you have openly criticized the government’s Warp Speed promotion of unregulated AI and data centers, protested the Iran war, or some other government policy, your social credit score may give big-box retailers like Walmart reason to charge you higher prices than their more obedient customers. Get enough strikes against your account and you might be banned from buying anything at all in their stores.
Who benefits from this rigged dystopian setup? Walmart shareholders will definitely like it. Technocrats who need inflation to justify the transformation of America from a constitutional republic to a technocracy, will also cheer it on.
Walmart already has cameras installed in the self-checkout aisles, which scan the facial features of every customer. They are also capable of identifying you by your cellphone each time you go through to checkout. This explains why even people who pay in cash at Walmart sometimes get email communications from the company based on their buying habits.
Similarly, the home-improvement giant Lowe’s recently announced it has installed thousands of Flock cameras in the vicinity of its parking lots, while installing facial-recognition scanning systems inside its stores.
Were you aware that if you have any kind of online footprint, you likely already have a “digital twin” and how that could be useful to the algorithm-based technocratic surveillance state?
All this is set forth by professor Jon Padfield in an interview with Nate Polson of the Canadian Prepper podcast below. He also reveals the key role of the AI data centers being built across America and gives practical steps on how to opt out of the beast system.
The end game here is to rob you of your free will and deny you your humanity as an individual by herding you into various sets and subsets of the population that get scored by the AI algorithms. Based on your score, you get rewarded or punished by the government-corporate public-private partnerships that run the AI-based control grid in the American technocracy.
Remember, wherever you go, eyes are watching. This article only addresses one small component of the beast system, retail businesses. You will bump up against the system in so many other ways, with modern vehicles scooping up your driving data, with the insurance and healthcare system vacuuming up your physical data, with the banking system, you name it. It’s a system based on total information awareness. That’s why you can’t call this beast a Marxist. It’s much bigger than any Marxist system the world has ever seen.
It’s easy to point the finger at China and call them a totalitarian society while ignoring the fact that America is rapidly becoming just the same. China built its control grid largely in partnership with American companies, using American technology, and I believe it’s being used as a testing ground for further implementation here and around the world.
BOTTOM LINE: Everyone will have to make their own decisions on how best to unplug from the system, or whether to unplug at all. Is it time to boycott the big-box retailers who see no problem in sneakily introducing their part of the beast system that will ensnare and enslave millions of people?
Pray for discernment. Never comply. Question everything.
“Operation Warp Speed” was a SPECTACULAR SUCCESS [At killing Americans], in fact, many [other genocidal maniacs] say, one of the most successful [depopulation] things ever done by an American President." ~ Trump
The WinePress | substack.com/@thewinepress
Today, Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared before a Senate Committee hearing led by Kentucky GOP Senator Rand Paul over the origins of Covid-19, something the two have repeatedly squared-off over before.
But before the proceedings began, Fauci announced that he would be pleading the Fifth Amendment and would not answer any questions.
Dr. Anthony Fauci declined to answer senators’ questions at a contentious hearing Wednesday on the origins of Covid and the government’s handling of the pandemic, saying he would invoke his Fifth Amendment right to avoid the possibility that Republicans use his testimony to prosecute him for perjury.
The surprise decision set the stage for a hyper-partisan hearing that yielded no new revelations about the origins of the coronavirus or the government response to the pandemic. But the absence of Fauci’s testimony presented plenty of opportunities for Republicans and Democrats to present dueling narratives about those issues — and about the doctor himself.
Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee used their allotted time to criticize the doctor’s recommendations during the Covid pandemic as the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, accusing him of providing harmful advice on issues such as lockdowns and of lacking candor on the origins of the coronavirus.
Democrats, meanwhile, came to Fauci’s defense, painting the hearing as a Republican-led effort to entrap Fauci into committing perjury and using their time to focus criticism on the Trump administration’s health care policies.
After Fauci had invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times, committee Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., said as the hearing ended that he would call for a vote to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress. He said after the hearing that the committee would vote on the issue next week.
All the criminals in the country plead the Fifth without fail.
All these hearings are just more daytime soap opera drama. Some yelling and screaming, but nothing else happens. No punishment, no fines, no jail, and nothing more than that.
Per usual, it was a waste of time. Nothing ever happens at these things. It’s good for television and viral clips, but no judgment or justice ever comes of these things.
Paul continues to beat the drum over the origins of Covid — another lie and distraction in and of itself — and has these pow-wows with Fauci.
It’s all so nonsensical. I have already exposed Rand Paul for the fraud and hypocrite he is, as he too was a big promoter of the vaccines when they were being rolled out, how getting vaccinated was a great incentive to take off the masks, the only way “we are getting out of this [pandemic]” is to take the vaccine, elderly who have been vaccinated have a “twinkle in their eye” because they got their freedoms back and feel safe from the vaccine; and would then advocate for the creation of new vaccines later that year because of purported new variants rendering the first batches ineffective.
The man is a total sleaze. Why isn’t he grilling Fauci, Birx, Trump, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J and more, etc. for the incalculable number of deaths and irreparable harm caused by the clot shots? Exactly. That’s a no-go zone for these people, can’t talk about that…
"(Fauci being the main driver behind Covid is) a fairy tale for adults.”
Nevertheless, and notwithstanding, of course, President Donald Trump had to give his input on this drama.
He made sure to once again heap praise upon Operation Warp Speed, which he oversaw in 2020, while also claiming that more people died under Biden than under him. He then tried to craft a narrative that he sidelined Fauci and did not regard his policy recommendations.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote:
“Many more people died of Covid under the Biden Administration than under the Trump Administration.
“Operation Warp Speed” was a SPECTACULAR SUCCESS, in fact, many say, one of the most successful things ever done by an American President.
“I overrode Fauci on this. His ideas were CRAZY! Also, I said from the beginning that the Virus came from the Wuhan Laboratory in China. Fauci strongly disagreed, always trying to protect China. I Inherited Fauci, who was there since the 1980’s, but with each passing day, relied less and less on him. He made too many bad calls, like on MASKS. Remember at the beginning he was an anti-masker. He then switched to a super-masker.
“In any event I didn’t let him shut the Country down, although he wanted to. I went the Federalist way, and let the governors decide. The Republican governors did a much better job than the Dumocrats. Fauci was largely taken out of play, and then along came Sleepy Joe Biden, who made Fauci a “King!” I called Biden to tell him Fauci was no good, either didn’t have a clue, or was dishonest. The call was well received, but sadly, not acted on. Biden went on to give Fauci vast destructive power. The rest is history! President DJT.”
He said something identical in the White House.
However, interestingly, he said he “respects” President Biden’s pardon of Fauci for potential offenses committed between 2014 and January 2025. So Trump has effectively pardoned Fauci as well. No prosecution is coming (let me see your shocked face).
This is certainly not the first time Trump has praised OWS — the whole-of-government order that has completely destroyed people’s lives, families, businesses, and economies around the world forever — such as the case (among many) last year when he commented that OWS was “one of the greatest achievements ever in politics or in the military.”
And as far as the Covid vaccines death shots are concerned, the man absolutely knew what was coming, he understood and understands now what it was all about, as his own administration was preparing for the lockdowns and vaccines in advance. In September 2019, he signed an executive order to create new vaccines using “innovative technologies” in preparation for an outbreak or pandemic. Then in January 2020, a whole week before he announced the prevalence of “coronavirus,” his administration inked a contract with Moderna to produce mRNA vaccines — months before OWS was officially enacted in May.And Fauci? Well, we all remember (at least I remember) when in 2017 Fauci now infamously said that there was going to be a pandemic in Trump’s administration.
“There is no question that there will be a challenge, the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already of ongoing disease.
“But also there will be a surprise outbreak. And I hope by the end of my relatively short presentation, you’ll understand why history, and the history of the last 32 years that I’ve been the director of NIAID will tell the next administration, that there’s no doubt in anyone’s mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with.”
Furthermore, Trump is simply trying to revise history.
Of course, when Trump was out making empty campaign speeches in 2024 to get reelected, Trump told Tim Pool that he would prosecute Fauci for lying to Congress.
Furthermore, let’s not forget the times Trump defended Fauci amidst it all, claiming that he, Fauci, and the administration were all working closely together.
On top of that, don’t let us forget the times Trump emphasized that it was he and his administration that forced the lockdowns, and it was the right thing to do.
Never forget.
And again, watch as he, surrounded by his cabinet members, including Fauci and Birx, who supported the necessity of this spending package, all belly laugh as Trump signed into law the $6.2 trillion CARES Act.
John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
It’s all lies and deceit, and they all serve their father and god, Satan.
Proverbs 16:29 A violent man enticeth his neighbour, and leadeth him into the way that is not good. [30] He shutteth his eyes to devise froward things: moving his lips he bringeth evil to pass.
For a man who said he was going to “drain the swamp,” tell me, MAGA, how many high-level arrests have there been? Name one, just one. But these people will be hopped-up on hopium again in a week. ‘We got him this time! He’s going down!’ (Insert name).
Robert J. Burrowes, Ph.D. | TRANSCEND Media Service | transcend.org
“First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.”
Martin Niemöller, a prominent Lutheran pastor, wrote these words after spending eight years in Nazi prisons and concentration camps from 1937-1945.
One of the most enduring beliefs held by the bulk of the human population is that wars are fought to be won.
Another is that wars are fought to ‘defend’ one or more nation-states (or other political group) against what people are told is a threat to some vital aspect of their national security, invariably including the lives of members of their own population.
A third widely-held belief is that politicians and officers directing the war strategy for your country (or group) are interested in minimizing casualties among your own population.
But as I explained briefly in a recent article – see ‘Resisting the New World Order: Your Technocratic Slave Camp’ – these and other common beliefs about wars (and many other subjects not considered here), including the political and legal infrastructure in which they are supposed to be contained, are simply delusions promoted by Elite-owned and controlled media and social media to consolidate your existing prejudices – nationalism being a key one in this context – distract you from any genuinely critical analysis that might make you question the dominant (that is, Elite) narratives and overwhelm you with an unending stream of trivia. As a result, the typical individual is left in a state of perpetual confusion: bereft of the capacity to think, feel and analyze, let alone to act powerfully in response.
But if wars are not meant to be won, why are they fought at all?
In essence, wars are fought to achieve three primary, interrelated outcomes:
a restructuring of world order in which any particular war is just one step in a wider, longer term program to establish Elite (now technocratic) control over the Earth, its (remaining) human population and all of its resources,
significant (and ultimately substantial) human depopulation (with combatants and civilians on both sides of a war, as well as third party populations, being equally expendable), and
greater Elite profits.
For these three outcomes to be achieved, it is vital that there are as many wars being fought as possible at any one time and that they are fought for as long as possible: ideally, they must become, in a sense, ‘perpetual’ in the way that US wars on Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan dragged on for decades and many other ‘less prominent’ wars have too.
For centuries then, one primary element in the formula for achieving these three outcomes of war has been through Elite control of governments; this is largely achieved through ensuring government indebtedness to the Elite through its ownership and control of the banking system.
And the most effective way to maintain and expand this government indebtedness is to ensure that war is perpetual. Among others, this point has been made by G. Edward Griffin in his classic work The Creature from Jekyll Island in which he carefully explained the five points of what he called ‘The Rothschild Formula’ wherein nations are on-goingly entrapped in a perpetual cycle of paying for war through debt, noting also that ‘it may be necessary to finance both sides of the conflict’. Thus, while always proclaiming the virtues of peace, ‘the unspoken objective is perpetual war’. See The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve 5th ed. pp. 217-234. There is another account that identifies the membership of the Elite, its historical origins and how it exercises control over governments in Historical Analysis of the Global Elite: Ransacking the World Economy Until ‘You’ll Own Nothing.’
In this way, the maximum number of people (soldiers and civilians) are killed (whether by weapons or by the ‘spin-off’ impacts of them, including the starvation of third-party populations), the remainder are put under more direct (and, more recently, technocratic) control and profits are maximized through weapons sales, improved access to key resources (particularly land, energy and minerals) and rebuilding destroyed infrastructure that, these days, is increasingly technocratized during rebuilding. On the latter point, see ‘Like Halliburton in Iraq, BlackRock to Rake in a Trillion Rebuilding the Destruction They Financed in Ukraine’.
War for Technocracy
But times have changed. And while none of the fundamental objectives of war has changed, the manner in which these objectives are achieved has evolved as technological advances create new possibilities for killing and control, some of them more obscure than others. In essence, these include new ISTAR (intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, reconnaissance) capacities, new weapons systems and new targets.
And while many of these technologies may be ‘battle-tested’ on a military battlefield (such as Ukraine or Iran) or during a genocide such as that being conducted against the Palestinians – see, for example, The Palestine Laboratory: How Israel Exports the Technology of Occupation around the World – they are ultimately intended (and already deployed in many contexts) for use against the vast bulk of the human population; that is, us.
Beyond the killing of many of us, control of the remainder is the intention.
According to Peter Thiel, one of the founders of Palantir, the technology company building significant elements of the technocracy:
The initial founding vision was that we were going to use technology to change the whole world and basically overturn the monetary system of the world… We could never win an election on getting certain things because we were in such a small minority, but maybe you could unilateral[ly] change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never going to agree with you through technological means, and this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics. See ‘Peter Thiel: The Billionaire Buying the End of Democracy’.
Among others, when analyst Iain Davis studied the ideology behind the Elite plan his conclusion was simple: ‘This vice-like behavioural control of populations is at the heart of Praxian ideology.’ See ‘The Praxian Genocidal Kill Chain – Part 1’.
To reiterate then: In this context, control means that the Elite plans to kill off many of us and impose technocratic rule on the remaining human population, most of whom will be transhumanized. For a fine, detailed elaboration of the Elite plan, see Patrick Wood’s The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism.
And Wood’s ‘Technocracy News & Trends’ is the authoritative source keeping track of developments in relation to technocracy and transhumanism.
ISTAR & other Technological Capacities
Many advances in ISTAR capacities have been made possible by the deployment of 5G (and soon 6G), and while there is no doubt that this substantially enhances the military capacity to perform many intelligence, surveillance and other functions – for one discussion, see ‘How the 5G network could benefit the military’ – it is also the case that this technology is being used to vastly expand Elite control over the human population generally.
In essence, because the plan is to imprison those left alive as slaves in a technocratic ‘smart city’, the deployment of 5G is enabling a combination of technologies that allow comprehensive (not just mass) surveillance, digitization of our identity and money, as well as robotization of the workforce, policing and the military; geofencing to confine us within the few kilometres between our allocated sleeping quarters and workplace; measures to restructure the global economy in favour of the mega-corporations and consolidation of ownership and control of agricultural land as well as the production, distribution and even nature of the world’s food supply (which will have you eating synthesized, food-like substances that are largely devoid of nutrition). It also includes the power to control the narrative by using government and corporate media and social media to promote Elite propaganda while censoring the truth.
How will this be achieved? Obviously, mainly using technology: Using computers, drones, smart phones, GPS devices, smart TVs and other household devices, social media, smart meters, surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, online banking, license plate readers and driverless cars, you will live under constant surveillance and be readily controlled whether in your sleeping quarters, car or out in the community. And you will be photographed many times each day. Your DNA will not your own, your internet access will be monitored and controlled; and like everything, your access will depend on your compliance with elite directives.
Combined with economic measures, particularly including changes to banking, a financial transaction control grid is being created: cash is being eliminated and we will be forced to use digital payments using programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies.
As mentioned, all of these technologies are largely dependent on 5G for optimal functioning. When combined, they will be able to digitize our identity and connect it with our bank, health, legal and other records to create a social credit score that will determine what we can and cannot do and where we can do it.
In short, we will be locked in a technological prison, whether it is our sleeping quarters, our car or our local community, in a ‘smart city’. Physical prisons will no longer matter because everywhere will be the prison.
Given the highly militarized world in which we live, substantial research and development budgets ensure the routine production of new and, usually, superior weapons systems. While all of these, when they become public, are usually ‘justified’ by the usual propaganda – they are ‘imperative for national defense’ – the reality is that they can and will be used against civilians. Remember the atomic weapons dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Out of the hundreds of thousands killed or injured in those blasts, how many were soldiers? Was the fire-bombing of Dresden during World War II intended to kill combatants?
Nothing has changed since World War II and international treaties that supposedly protect civilians in wartime are meaningless.
The Elite still has you in its sights.
Here’s a sample of new (or old but well concealed) weapons systems:
But it is not just Britain that is ‘at war’: so are you. And unless you are using a Linux program to run your computer (and Graphene OS for your phone) and boycotting all corporate software programs (including in relation to email, social media, internet searching, video watching and communications), to defend your online privacy, you are simply surrendering all of the data the Elite needs to enslave or kill you some time in the next few years.
Advances in the use of satellite-based technologies are rapidly expanding the capacity for widespread lethality. For example, President Putin recently implied on record that Russia’s satellite constellation will be used to control heavy strike drones – see ‘Orbital Chessboard: Starlink Sits On The Throne, But The Sky Is Getting Crowded And Angry’ – but these can be used against civilians as well as soldiers. And Russia’s constellation is modest compared to the Starlink constellation owned by Elon Musk.
Of course, whether a nuclear weapon or a weapon such as the RS-28 Sarmat is used, as with all of the weapons mentioned here, clearly there can be no distinction between combatants and civilians, even if this issue is ever considered, which is unlikely.
What is a digital kill chain? According to Lt General Philip Campose (Retd), it is the process whereby, and timeframe within which, ‘a force can detect, process, decide, and strike the adversary’s critical targets’. See ‘The digital kill-chain: Russia’s mastery of a critical skill in modern warfare’. This process is reduced from days to hours or, sometimes, minutes with the degree of human engagement in the process highly variable. And this is one reason why so many ‘mistakes’ (that is, unintended killings) are made.
But notice the absence of reference to military targets in this definition. Karp, an arch-Zionist, has been happy for Palantir technology to ‘identify’ Palestinians murdered during the genocide in Gaza. But the technology is also being used to spy on us all as the technocratic state is built around us.
While some of these new technologies are well known, it does not mean that their dangers are equally appreciated, especially those that are aggressively promoted as central to our ‘privacy and security’.
Despite the lethality of the weapons systems above, undoubtedly one of the most effective weapon technologies in this category to date has been vaccines, with the documented death toll from this weapon, as well as its incapacitating impacts on vast numbers of others, now extensive. For just one source that cites 1349 other sources, see Sayer Ji’s ‘Vaccination’.
And while micro- and nanocontamination from vaccines and other sources has long been documented – see ‘New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination’ – it is now at dangerous levels worldwide. The website ‘Unhackable Animal’ offers a photo gallery (in development) and a lengthy book of 344 color microscopy images, coupled with short essays, of blood taken by ‘The Micronauts’, an international group of researchers, that reveals ‘assembled synthetic biology and nanotechnology contamin[ants] from hundreds of samples, including drinking water, pharmaceuticals, supplements, dermal patches, nasal swabs, household products, environmental samples and bodily fluids, documenting evidence of the undisclosed adulteration of our bodies and the environment…. [demonstrating] how we are unknowingly being hacked by the transhumanist and AI Biodigital convergence agenda to merge organic life with technology.’ See Nano Nano: Microscopy Investigations.
New Targets
As should now be obvious, the Elite has conducted an increasingly sophisticated and complex war over recent centuries as new technologies have been developed, some of which have made it possible to expand the range of targets.
Undoubtedly the most critical development in this regard concerns weapons to control the human mind, a very long-term undertaking that now involves a vast range of technologies and takes place in four dimensions: psychological mind control, political mind control, medical mind control, and technological mind control. These capacities are already deployed. See ‘The Elite’s5,000-Year War on Your Mind is Climaxing: Can We Defeat it?’
The essence of these technologies is simple: the target is citizens (not armies or guerrillas) and the battlefield is the mind (not a location somewhere).
Czech researcher Mojmír Babáček, who has long studied this subject, concluded his 2004 study with this warning:
One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of the human brain is that the governments, who own such technologies, could use them without having to consult public opinion. Needless to say, any meaningful democracy in today’s world could be disrupted, through secret and covert operations. It is not inconceivable that in the future, entire population groups subjected to mind control technologies, could be living in a ‘fake democracy’ where their own government or a foreign power could broadly shape their political opinions by means of mind control technologies. See ‘Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons: The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain’.
Or the Elite, while directing its puppets in government and the technology sphere, could shape your perception of your existence in one of their ‘smart city’ slave camps so that you believe you are living an ideal life.
Without a mind of your own, the Elite will have total control of your being.
In essence, it is a very long time since the bodies of enemy combatants with a weapon were, in theory at least, the sole target. You – your body and your mind – are now the target.
Which is why the most dangerous weapons are the ones targeting you that you do not, or cannot, perceive.
Resisting the Elite’s War on Humanity
So if we are to defend ourselves against the Elite program to kill or enslave us all, it is crucial that more people understand that program and that those who are courageous enough to do so, take strategic action to resist it.
This requires us to resist war itself, but also the technocratic program that underpins it.
Therefore we must undermine both the existing foundations that make war possible and also those other technological foundations being put in place to kill or control us all. The strategic goals necessary to achieve the former are identified here: ‘Strategic Goals for Ending War’.
And the strategic goals necessary to defeat the Elite-driven effort to impose a technocratic control grid on the human population have been identified on the ‘We Are Human We Are Free’ website, which identifies 30 strategic goals but also includes a one-pageflyer(available in 24 languages) which nominates those actions that must be undertaken as a priority if we are to defeat the rapidly advancing planetary technocracy.
Each component of this strategy will require ongoing effort to mobilize enough people to take action.
Conclusion
The rapidly advancing Elite takeover will require committed individual and community effort to defeat it.
There are some vital actions that you will need to take if you wish to defend yourself. They cannot be done for you.
And there are critical actions that will require community effort.
The challenge for those who are aware already is to commit themselves to acting strategically and engaging others to do so too.
Or, as Martin Niemoller wrote following the Nazi takeover in Germany and his eight years in Nazi prisons and concentration camps: ‘Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.’
Truth11 Films 5th short film: We have been tricked into fighting perpetual wars of mass genocide for pointless profit. There is no enemy. The enemy is within the US government. All exterior enemies are created to justify the advancing military industrial complex.
There is only one way war will end. The masses must rise up, unite, and demand world peace.
This film contains the footage released by Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange.
Film Released In 2011
True Journalism Reports The Truth
If you find the information and effort we provide valuable; please support our work by becoming a monthly subscriber or by making a small one time donation. Thank you Truth Warriors for supporting independent media.
A silent cull of 65+ yo is underway in Finland and Denmark. The Hellth Blob is using a"clinical trial of shingles vaccine to prevent dementia" as a bait.
Etienne de la Boetie | substack.com/@artofliberty
Sasha Latypova, Due Diligence and Art | sashalatypova.substack.com
GSK is launching a 33,600-person study to see whether elderly people who get its shingles vaccine Shingrix are less likely to develop any form of dementia, including Alzheimer’s, compared to those who get a placebo shot. The study, which will take place in Finland, will likely be one of the largest trials ever conducted for the disease.
Here is the study design. It states that the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the recombinant zoster vaccine on the risk of new diagnosis of dementia among adults aged 76 years or older in Finland. Participants will be enrolled and randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix) or placebo.
Now, let’s do a quick math - Finland is a small country with about 5M total population, including estimated 600,000 people aged 76+ yo. Finland also historically boasts some of the most lavish social security benefits. Albeit, with greater and greater government indebtedness, they have been somewhat curtailed. Nevertheless, the socialist utopia promises that the government has no way of fulfilling are very expensive and continuously compound the indebtedness problem.
Now, GSK is aiming to enroll ~5% (!!!) of the country’s senior citizen population in just one “study” and inject 3/4 of them, or ~4.2% of the Finish elderly with Shingrix. Hey grandma! Want to reduce your risk of dementia? Would you like to step over to this friendly death accelerator clinic?
The plan to cull the useless eaters is even more obvious in another Nordic state - Denmark. GSK is launching a similar friendly senior poisoning operation with Shingrix … ahem, a “clinical trial”, which is aimed at a deeper societal slice - 65+yo, targets enrollment of 162,000 (!) people, and will not have a placebo arm at all. There are an estimated 1.2M of Danes in that age group, representing a 20% of the total population. Just as Finland, Denmark is held up as an example of a “working” socialist paradise. We are about to find out the shocking news that all governments lie and steal, and when lying and stealing runs into the debt wall, they proceed to genocide the claimants of the social benefits. A quick calculation shows that a whopping 13.5% (!!!) of the Danish seniors are being targeted for this poisoning/cull round using GSK’s “clinical trial” as a cover story.
What is the incentive for the governments? Finland spends about 13% GDP on its lavish social benefit system which includes publicly-funded long-term care (where a lot of 76+ yo can be found). The life expectancy is high, 82.6 years, and over 85 years for women. The total net present value of all social benefits per 65yo+ is approximately $1M per person.
Denmark spends less on public benefits (9% of GDP) but has an extensive workplace benefit scheme. The corporations that are fused with the socialist welfare government act as a government extension. The life expectancy is slightly lower - 81.8 years, but the NPV of social benefits is close to Finland ~$950K. Sources of various statistics here.
In case you are wondering, while the US is criticized as “capitalist” and lacking in social welfare, the NPV of social benefits averages to about the same as in the Nordic socialist paradise countries, with the caveat that the life expectancy in the US is much lower, 79 years, and the spread of low-to-high benefits is much wider ($700k - $1.15 million per person).
These “studies” are planned to be completed by end of 2029, just in time for the NWO which is planned to start in 2030.
What is the basis of the claim that a shingles vax may prevent dementia?
You may say: but wait, surely, you are making up a conspiracy! This is science. This is a clinical trial - how can GSK possibly get these studies approved by the institutional review boards otherwise? There must be some rational basis for their hypothesis, i.e. some solid data indicating there is prevention of dementia possible by a shingles vax injection…
Let’s take a look at the study, published in Nature, upon which the dementia-prevention hypothesis was constructed. The study was a retrospective analysis of health records from Wales, where, due to restriction of eligibility for free shingles vaccines was set arbitrarily by the national health bean counters. Due to this arbitrary cut-off, it was possible to compare records of people who were of the same age, but separated by about a week in date of birth. The 1-week older cohort was 42% vaxxed and the earlier cohort was practically unvaxxed for shingles. The datasets are thus reasonably well separated, and “all other things equal” provide a good comparison.
During our follow-up period of 7 years, a total of 14,465 among 296,324 adults in our sample had at least one diagnosis of shingles [5%]. […] When calculating the effect of actually receiving the zoster vaccine, we find a reduction in the probability of having at least one shingles diagnosis of 2.3 (95% CI = 0.5–3.9; P = 0.011) percentage points over the seven-year follow-up period (Fig. 2b); an effect (37.2% (95% CI = 19.7–54.7) in relative terms) that is similar in size to that observed in clinical trials of the live-attenuated zoster vaccine (Zostavax)30.
Even if you still foolishly believe that some vaccines may provide some benefits (as many large “alternative” grifter accounts claim) - looks like shingles vaccine is one of the most useless out there. It provides a 2% “protection” from shingles, i.e. absolutely nothing. The pharma company, health authorities and doctors will all lie to you and tell you “it cuts your risk by up to 55%” (because they will use the upper bound of the confidence interval for the relative risk). My readers are well familiar with absolute vs relative risk statistic. Absolute is what matters to you. Relative is what matters to the government and your doctor’s paycheck, and must be ignored by you when making any decisions about any medical intervention or test.
Did the shingles vax prevent dementia in this dataset?
Given the neuropathological overlap between dementia types and the difficulty in distinguishing dementia types clinically31, as well as our reduced statistical power when studying less-common outcomes, we defined dementia as dementia of any type or cause as our outcome. […]
During our seven-year follow-up period, 35,307 among 282,541 adults in our sample were newly diagnosed with dementia. [12.5%]
Scaled to account for the fact that not all those who were eligible received the vaccine, we find that actually receiving the zoster vaccine reduced the probability of a new dementia diagnosis by 3.5 (95% CI = 0.6–7.1; P = 0.019) percentage points, corresponding to a relative reduction of 20.0% (95% CI = 6.5–33.4) (Fig. 3b).
As expected, the result is as meaningless as the “shingles prevention” claim! The number they were able to coax with all the statistical trickery rounds to zero for practical purposes. In addition, no analyses were performed to see if this “prevention of dementia” was associated with any quality-of-life or length-of-survival benefit. No analyses of adverse events in the shingles-vaxxed vs. shingles unvaxxed was done.
I did a quick search for adverse events associated with the shingles vaccination in VAERS database. Currently, there are ~138,000 reports for shingles vaccination, considering that VAERS under-reporting ratio could be 40x-100x. Restricting my search to only “serious” adverse events, these are the top ones ranked by frequency of reporting. As you can see, “death” is ranked #7, with shingles disease as #1 “adverse event” (we should read all these as intentional effects of the poison shots):
Just reading through the SAEs frequently reported, it was evident that symptoms associated with an accelerated decline in seniors are commonly induced by the shingles vax - dizziness, falls (and fractures), pneumonia, paralysis, pain, muscle weakness, decrease in mobility and daily activity, etc. I think this quick search confirms to me that this is what these “dementia prevention clinical trials” are really about - intentional cull of the senior populations.
What if the shingles vaxxed group has a significant increase in deaths or a decrease in life expectancy? That would not be counted as “dementia” and not reported in the Nature paper. After all, if a 70 yo has a heart attack and dies from it, they won’t be diagnosed with dementia, will they? Were their causes of death perhaps different in shingles vaxxed vs in the non-vaxxed group? The paper does not provide this information.
I am willing to bet $1M these types of analyses were performed but not published, and, instead, reserved for the “public hellth” policy making circles.
Please tell your loved ones, and do not comply!
Below are additional resources on shingles vaccination, chicken pox vaccination and adverse events:
Truth Warriors | Armed With The Truth • United We Stand
Thank you for being one of the individuals in our world that wants the truth. Thank you for reading articles on Truth11.com. Thank you for sharing the truth and for speaking the truth.
Thank you for being a Truth Warrior!.
Truth11.com is an independent media site. Our mission is to arm you with the truth. Please join us in our mission by becoming a monthly subscriber to help us cover costs.
Police Are Deploying 60 MPH Autonomous Drones to Read Your License Plate from the Sky
The Daily News from the Art of Liberty Foundation | Etienne de la Boetie2
The Free Thought Project | TheFreeThoughtProject.com
(Motor Biscuit) If you thought Flock Safety’s Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) were deeply invasive when they were just mounted to neighborhood stop signs and hidden inside speed trailers, you might want to look up.
The company that built a massive, interconnected surveillance net across American roadways has officially taken its technology airborne. As highlighted in a viral X post by Josh Walkos, Flock is rolling out “Flock Alpha”—a highly advanced, autonomous police drone designed to track vehicles and suspects from the sky.
Walkos perfectly captured the escalating nature of the tech in his post: “Remember when everyone was told Flock was ‘just reading license plates’? Anyway, here’s Flock Alpha, the autonomous drone.”
The “Drone as a First Responder” Play
Flock isn’t just selling a standard quadcopter; they are aggressively pushing a concept known as “Drone as First Responder” (DFR). Following a strategic partnership with aviation software company Aerodome, Flock integrated its existing street-level surveillance web directly into an autonomous aerial platform.
The specs on the Flock Alpha are undeniably impressive—and for privacy advocates, entirely terrifying.
When a 911 call, a gunshot audio sensor, or a street-level ALPR camera triggers an alert, an officer can deploy the Alpha drone directly from their smartphone. The drone launches itself from a weatherproof docking station and can reach the scene at speeds up to 60 MPH. According to Flock’s promotional materials, the drone arrives first on the scene 78% of the time, long before patrol cars can navigate traffic.
Once in the air, the drone streams thermal and high-definition video directly to dispatchers. More concerning for everydaydrivers is the camera payload: the Alpha is equipped with an optical zoom so powerful it can read your vehicle’s license plate from 2,000 feet away—roughly half a mile.
A Flying Privacy Nightmare
While Flock markets the Alpha drone as a life-saving tool that can quickly locate missing persons, monitor high-speed pursuits, or assess fire hazards, civil liberties organizations are sounding a massive alarm.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) have repeatedly warned that Flock is building a privatized, nationwide mass-surveillance dragnet with incredibly weak oversight. Because Flock’s systems log the movements of every single vehicle they see—not just the cars of suspected criminals—adding an autonomous, thermal-equipped drone to the mix essentially gives local police departments military-grade aerial tracking capabilities.
Critics argue that without strict, legally binding guardrails regarding data retention and deployment parameters, DFR programs will inevitably be used for routine surveillance and unwarranted tracking. Given that Flock’s street-level cameras are already capable of generating 30-day “heat maps” of where innocent citizens travel, the addition of a 60 MPH drone scanning plates from the clouds is a massive escalation in the modern surveillance state.
“I do believe that we’re just at the beginning of the tokenization of all assets,, from real estate, to equity, to bonds..”~ Larry Fink, CEO Blackrock
This is a subject that I have discussed on many occasions for years, but the acceleration of this atrocity of mass government theft is now progressing at lightning speed, and openly admitted to by the powers behind the throne. The evildoing Larry Fink, the CEO of Blackrock, who by the way, was Trump’s first choice for Secretary of the Treasury, (Position now filled by Scott Bessent) is also the Chairman of the heinous World Economic Forum (WEF). He also was a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton and her run for president in 2016. His past is rife with far left-wing politics, so any notion that there is any difference between the democrats and republicans should by now be dismissed.
As well reported today by Parallel Mike of Parallel Systems, Romania’s entire land registry, and every back-up, was fully erased by a cyberattack; just as has been endlessly warned (threatened) about by Fink’s WEF organization. Every single property in Romania was threatened, due to no ownership records being available. All real estate markets, mortgage applications, notary services for land transfers were shut down. When no hard copy of deeds exist, and all is digitized, no one effectively owns anything, but that is exactly where we are headed. This is already the case with stocks and bonds, but the ruling class of globalists, desire to tokenize every asset on earth, including all property, financial assets, and even all individuals and their identities. If (when) this occurs, you will own nothing, and will lose control of everything you have ever worked for during your life.
This cyberattack scenario has happened many times in the near past, and seems to be a play to set up universal taking by way of digitizing and then tokenizing assets. Does this sound impossible to you? Does this sound like a ‘conspiracy theory?’ Does this sound like science fiction? It is none of these things, except a true conspiracy, as this attempt to take over every single asset on earth (The Great Taking) is not only well on its way to coming to fruition, it has been codified into law in Trump’s ‘Genius Act.’This heinous piece of legislation is meant to tokenize every single asset class, by placing a monetary value on every asset by digital asset exchange. A Digital Asset Service Provider will have power to affect:
(i) exchanging digital assets for monetary value;
(ii) exchanging digital assets for other digital assets;
(iii) transferring digital assets to a third party;
(iv) acting as a digital asset custodian; or
(v) participating in financial services relating to digital asset issuance.
The monetary unit that will be used is Trump’s ‘Stablecoin,’ which will be dependent on treasury bond backing (forced debt) administered by a private/government partnership, (Fascist) which will have a wide open back door, making it more dangerous and thieving than a Central Bank Digital Currency. (CBDC) This of course was the plan all along, as Trump used lies to claim his denial of any use of CBDCs while all the time knowing that his Stablecoin was nothing more than a CBDC on steroids.
I was in the finance business for 31 years as a Registered Principal with the SEC, and watched as physical paper stock and bond certificates were over time replaced by digital ownership, which is just one step away from full tokenization. I fought against this, and advised many clients to keep holding onto the physical certificates, but to no avail, as digitization of assets was demanded by most firms. When one does not hold an actual physical ownership certificate, when it becomes digital, the bank or digital holder now takes ownership of that asset away from the actual owner. ‘Legally,’ you no longer have any real claim to that asset, and with tokenization, control over assets by legitimate owners becomes impossible. This is theft by government fiat, and any excuse, any claimed ’emergency,’ any political dictate, has the ability to program use and/or ownership of all assets tokenized.
Tokenization, the next step after digitization, is the process of converting ownership of an asset into a digital token on a blockchain. This of course is sold to the ‘public’ as a safer way to hold assets, with more convenience, but what is not normally (almost never) discussed is the loss of ownership capability, and the vastly increased risk of theft by government technocrats, and the ability for thieving fascist government partners, to have instant programmable control over all tokenized assets. Do you understand what this means? It means that as Larry Fink’s organization, the WEF, was telegraphing the desired future when the evil Klaus Schwab said; “You will own nothing and be happy.”His statement was not some ideological hope, it was a statement of solidifying a sought after and pursued outcome that is now close to becoming completed.
Once assets are tokenized, a total loss of control becomes the norm. What this means, is that any asset you may own, or thought you owned, can become subject to theft by the State at any moment, and for virtually any reason made up by the controllers of these tokenized assets. The plot is to tokenize absolutely everything, every property, every asset on earth, financial, real estate, stocks, bonds, hard assets, including your own identity and body. This, if allowed to take place, would eliminate all property rights entirely, leaving the masses void of any property, and therefore fully dependent on the State. Your life in entirety would become one as a renter beholding to the very masters you allowed to lord over you under the guise of a ‘benevolent’ government. Nothing of the sort has ever existed, and it never will exist.
“Trump administration’s White House Crypto Council, chaired by Crypto Czar David Sacks, issued recommendations to foster digital asset growth in 2025. One key suggestion in the President’s Report on Digital Assets urges banking regulators to adopt a technology-neutral stance on how banks may hold tokenized securities.” This tokenization is now in high gear, and expanding exponentially.
Tokenized securities, which leverage blockchain or distributed ledger technology to represent assets via digital tokens, fall under the category of real-world assets (RWAs). The report advocates for regulatory clarity that the method of representation—whether traditional or tokenized—should not alter the risk weight applied to a bank’s capital calculations. In other words, this is simply a way to shield banks from liability from the ‘actual’ real owners of assets digitally held.
Though technical in nature, this approach gained traction when the FDIC, Federal Reserve, and OCC issued a clarification on the capital treatment of tokenized securities in the form of a FAQ, affirming equivalent treatment for tokenized securities that confer “identical legal rights” to their non-tokenized counterparts. This development carries significant implications. It paves the way for tokenized securities to scale, with market projections estimating trillions of dollars by 2030. Major players, including the NYSE, Goldman Sachs, Nasdaq, DTCC, BlackRock, BNY Mellon, Citi, and JPMorgan, have already initiated pilots or platforms for tokenized equities, funds, and deposits.
As I mentioned, this process of “The Great Taking” of all assets is not only well underway, but significantly and constantly advancing. When in place, remember, that you will own absolutely nothing! If knowledge of this does not bring about a massive awakening, nothing will, especially considering that this is a monstrous consumer society.
Of course, this sought-after stealing of all assets will not be admitted to by this abominable governing system, its corporate partners, its AI systems, the fascist NGOs, or the prostituted media, as these entities will claim to be your savior, and will claim to be building a safety net to protect you, by titling all your assets in their name, after propagandizing the lie that you are at risk from outside interests, hackers, and cyber-attacks. This all while they plot to claim all assets on earth as their own.
It is up to you, all of you, to stop this horrendous plot. Do not allow an AI takeover. Do not allow biometric identification. Do not allow digitization of everything, tokenization of everything, and abandon this hellacious system. If you attempt to change things from within, if you attempt to vote your way out of this, you will fail. Time is now severely limited. If you do nothing, you will own nothing. You decide.
“And with technology, as we know, it can go very, very rapidly.”~ Donald Trump
Login
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/13297b15-9b1e-425b-99d2-24b1659a3c2a_6000x4000.jpg)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/photo_2026-07-30_08-17-25-1.jpg)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/photo_2026-07-29_18-06-05-1.jpg)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!mKzI!,w_336,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F52319d1f-342f-4040-999a-eadfb9bf9e59_1080x1350.png)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!OcZn!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb398a7e8-a2df-47cf-a18c-f04c652376c7_520x830.png)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/Trump-Still-Taking-Credit-For-The-Covid-Vaccine-Genocide.jpg)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!U9St!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2da8b6de-f9c9-4750-8299-182de247ae21_946x1063.jpeg "Image")
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/Meanwhile-in-2025.jpg)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!xDdp!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fba61cc37-45eb-4476-81d6-20325aa7a096_1127x849.png)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!va_T!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb6c89428-b14c-4a0e-b6be-329a87158b76_804x372.jpeg "Image")
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!C904!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5e748eb8-caec-4163-98ac-331b24dfd2e8_1080x1542.jpeg "Image")
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/Screen-Shot-2024-11-21-at-5.04.03-PM.png)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!qIVT!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1fb26fdf-856c-479c-beee-cce6429d5272_762x748.jpeg)
![Fauci Pleads The Fifth 111 Times | Trump Calls Operation Warp Speed [Genocide] A 'Spectacular Success' And Pretends He Was Against Fauci, Despite Him Giving Fauci A Commendation For His Work + Respecting Biden's Pardon](https://cdn.getmidnight.com/0b0f9daf495199bed1eaf719adc55c4f/2026/07/Images---Memes-----701-1.jpg)
