Antthropic, Open AI & Government are the prime beneficiaries

Ed Dowd | Beyond the Narrative | eddowdbeyondthenarrative.substack.com

Background

On Tuesday, September 8, the day after Labor Day weekend (love the timing!) a young man by the name of Jacob Coxon put out a post on X…his first post ever and it went mega viral. He is a former employee of both Anthropic and OpenAI and he warned about the dangers of AI. Within 24 hours Jacob‘s X post had received 123 million views 650,000 likes 190,000 followers. Even Elon weighed in and said “I don’t think this has ever happened for a post from a new account with almost no prior activity.“ Immediately mainstream media hopped on board to add to the virality of the post. The Wall Street Journal within a few hours had already interviewed Jacob and mainstream media piled on. Both sides of the house then piled on (mostly Democrats) with X post quotes calling immediately to ask for regulations and government interventions.

I created my Substack Ed Dowd: Beyond the Narrative to address issues such as this, and I believe this is a well-orchestrated psyop to move the needle and change minds.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “psyop.”

“A military operation usually aimed at influencing the enemy’s state of mind through noncombative means… also: someone or something used by the government to influence the population’s opinions and attitudes.”

I am not saying Jacob Coxon is a government asset. I am saying the last 72 hours look less like a whistleblower and more like an inorganic panic narrative.

Anomalies

The X account @hilbertspaess had almost no footprint before Tuesday night. The bio is two words: “ai research.” The account sat there for a year. Then, in one coordinated burst, a seven-post thread announcing a resignation from Anthropic, a warning that the labs are “gambling with our lives,” and a prediction that the people building this stuff privately believe it could kill everyone by the end of the decade. Overnight the post printed nine figures in views. Hundreds of thousands of likes. The account went from nobody to a household handle before most of the country had coffee.

That is not how organic X speech works: organic speech stumbles, it posts a draft, it deletes a typo and it has a history. This account had a history of silence, then a professionally punchy script, then the entire mainstream media stack that ran with it with hours of post.

The Wall Street Journal published an exclusive interview with Coxon very shortly after the post went live. Business Insider, Newsweek, the New York Post, Mashable, and Deadline, all ran the same quotes within hours. Then the next day live interviews on Fox News and CNN. That is not one reporter getting lucky on a late night scroll. That is a package. In my humble opinion you do not get a WSJ exclusive and a 100 million view thread by accident unless the interview was already in the can.

Then I did what I always do. I read the replies and skeptics on X. The anomaly hunters got there first. Parker Thayer laid out the timeline that made my former equity portfolio manager brain activate: the Journal piece “potentially” landing before the public post, an account with no prior engagement suddenly exploding, and the first quote posts arriving inside fifteen minutes from policy shops whose funding traces back to the same circle of Anthropic-adjacent philanthropy. Other users pointed at the empty follower graph, the sudden verification, the fact that the first amplifiers were not random citizens but people whose job is to turn fear into statutes and accusations of links to AI policy NGOs.

You can argue with any one of those dots. It is harder to argue with the cluster.

The big tell for me was what certain members of Congress do when a narrative is pre-cooked. Representative Ro Khanna very quickly quoted the thread and demanded a federal AI agency “like we have for nuclear power and airplanes,” pre-certification, kill switches, criminal penalties, and hearings with “researchers like Jacob.” He told Speaker Johnson to keep the House in session. On the other side of the Hill, Senator Bernie Sanders already had a superintelligence ban circulating with Representative Greg Casar creating a cabinet level agency, an advisory board of “experts,” the whole cathedral. Senators Chris Van Hollen and Richard Blumenthal piled on. OpenAI, not to be left out of its own “funeral”, started posting about national safety rules.

Classic Hegelian Dialectic

Thesis>Antithesis>Synthesis…also known as Problem>Reaction>Solution.

Hegel would recognize the move:

· Thesis-the labs are racing toward systems they cannot control

· Antithesis-the public is now terrified, and the screenshots of Coxon’s thread are the proof

· Synthesis-regulation, a licensing regime, a new agency and barriers to entry dressed up as “containment”

Then ask the only question that ever matters: Who benefits?

Let us start with who does not benefit:

· Not the open-source shops

· Not the startups that cannot afford a compliance department and a containment audit

· Not the Chinese labs, who will ignore the sermon and keep training regardless

The first beneficiaries are the two names in the original post: Anthropic and OpenAI.

They are burning cash at a rate that would make a 2000-2001 CLEC blush. Token prices keep falling. Enterprise demand is not doubling fast enough to offset it. The second derivative is slowing. Capex is a black hole. Valuations only work if the story stays vertical and the competitive set stays small. A federal moat with pre-certification, insurance mandates, criminal liability for unlicensed models does two things at once. It crushes the long tail of competitors who were eating their margins. And it gives the incumbents a political story to take to investors: “we are the responsible adults, the regulated utilities of intelligence, please keep funding the losses until the unit economics appear.”

The second beneficiary is the government itself (this push is mostly a Democrat project.)

A cabinet-level AI agency means new appropriations, new buildings, new GS-15s, new contractors, new “advisory boards” stuffed with the same people who wrote the talking points. Hearings mean travel budgets and television time. Pre-certification means a permanent inspection class. Mandatory insurance means a regulated market the agencies get to supervise. Every one of those is a funding request that survives the news cycle.

A few Republicans have already volunteered to help build the machine. Senator Josh Hawley has been the loudest, telling his own party it must “regulate” AI so it does not displace the worker, and he already has a bill with Blumenthal, co-sponsored by Senator Marsha Blackburn, to make federal reviews of advanced models mandatory. Representative Jay Obernolte has been shopping the Great American AI Act with Democrats Lori Trahan and House Republicans Scott Franklin and Erin Houchin. After Coxon’s thread, even Senator Ted Cruz, who spent last year trying to preempt state AI rules, posted that the risks are “dangerous and frightening,” that “we need guardrails,” and that he is working with Amy Klobuchar and John Thune on catastrophic bio and nuclear AI risk. You do not need the whole GOP…you only need a handful of names so the new agency can call itself bipartisan when the appropriation comes up.

Fear is how you grow the state when you cannot grow the economy.

Bottom Line

I recently wrote a post, Wall Street’s AI Capex Party...It’s 2 AM & The Bar is About To Close, where I outlined it is becoming more expensive to fund the buildout and investors are questioning the ultimate return on investment. A safety panic that ends in a licensing cartel is the most elegant refinancing I have seen in a long time for both the labs and the bureaucracy that will charge rent on the panic. You do not have to prove the models will kill us. You only have to make Congress and the public feel that they might. Fear is cheaper than a profitable product, and it is cheaper than a balanced budget.

Could Coxon be sincere? Sure…people leave jobs and people get scared…sincerity and utility are not opposites. The most effective operations use a real person with real anxiety and then put a megaphone, a Journal reporter, and a legislative calendar underneath him.

I do not know exactly how accurate these AI fears might be but I do know what a coordinated narrative looks like:

· An unused account, a same night exclusive

· Policy NGOs first in line comment

· Bills already written

· Multiple members of congress immediately posting on X their hot takes

· Two companies with a cash-burn problem recast as the only adults in the room

· Government, mostly Democrats, with just enough Republicans for cover, that suddenly needs another agency, another appropriation, and another reason to sit between you and the future.

· Two cash burning frontier AI companies that need to regulate their competition out of existence

Watch the cash, watch the narrative, watch the fear porn, watch who benefits…this is elaborate Kabuki Theater. After the Covid psyop this is the next big push in my opinion. All the signs are present.

“The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.” Proverbs 18:17

Original Article: https://eddowdbeyondthenarrative.substack.com/p/the-post-labor-day-ai-panic-psyop?r=12542m&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Trump Offers to Send $5,000 to Every Citizen If Republicans Retain Control of Congress

FOCAL POINTS (Courageous Discourse™) | John Leake | thefocalpoints.com

When George Washington first ran for the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1755, his campaign advisors recommended that he host parties at taverns near polling places and provide free booze to anyone who seemed inclined to support him. Washington refused to participate in what was essentially bribing voters with alcohol, and he lost the election. However, three years later, he decided to play the game and allowed his agent to provide roughly 160 gallons of alcoholic drinks for 391 voters—amounting to nearly half a gallon per person. This time he easily won the election. 

I thought of this incident when I saw the news this morning that—during a speech Wednesday night at the GOP’s midterm convention here in my native Dallas, Texas— President Trump proposed sending every adult American citizen a $5,000 “Trump dividend” if Republicans retain control of both chambers of Congress in November. As he put it: 

If the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000. It will be called the Trump dividend. Now all we have to do is win. Your vote will decide whether our country stumbles at the starting gate of our next 250 years or surges forward and never looks back.

Note that a $5,000 payout to 270 million adults would cost the US government approximately $1.35 trillion. Trump floated his proposal shortly after US public debt surpassed $40 trillion for the first time.

Uncle Sam’s infinite largesse has been enabled because Congress no longer even pretends to place limits of federal indebtedness. Since 2013, it has suspended the debt ceiling eight times, allowing for continued borrowing without a specific dollar limit for set periods. 

With Trump’s announcement, the US government has officially entered what I call the “drunken sailor in port” phase of our Constitutional Republic. Dying of some tropical disease in a Caribbean port and knowing that a British Navy press gang will soon force him into service on a warship, the sailor spends all of his money on rum and hookers and consoles himself that he’s had a good run. 

Original Article: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/trump-offers-to-send-5000-to-every

Real Canadian Patriots | Telegram

NotTheBee.com | Dr Jones

In October 2024, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) dismantled the largest and most sophisticated illicit drug superlab in Canadian history in Falkland, British Columbia. Federal investigators seized 54 kilograms of fentanyl, 390 kilograms of methamphetamine, 35 kilograms of cocaine, 15 kilograms of MDMA, and 89 firearms, alongside massive amounts of precursor chemicals and $500,000 in cash.

The RCMP estimated that the seized materials could have produced over 95 million potentially lethal doses of fentanyl.

As of September 2026, nearly two years after the raid, no one has been charged with producing or manufacturing fentanyl at the Falkland superlab. The sole suspect named in connection with the investigation, Gaganpreet Singh Randhawa, pleaded guilty in early 2026 to attempting to export 310 kilograms of methamphetamine to the Philippines and various drug and firearms possession charges, but his plea did not include charges related to the fentanyl production at the Falkland site.

From the Western Standard:

Nearly two years after the RCMP announced it had dismantled the largest fentanyl and methamphetamine lab in Canadian history, no one has been charged with producing, manufacturing, or distributing fentanyl from there, and it remains unclear if anyone ever will.

That's … refreshingly honest. As a recap, here's some background on the case:

On October 31, 2024, the RCMP put on — by its standards — a fairly grandiose press conference at divisional headquarters in Surrey announcing it had taken down what Assistant Commissioner David Teboul called the 'largest and most sophisticated illicit fentanyl and meth facility ever found in Canada.'

Ok, sounds like things got off to a strong start.

So, where did things go sideways?

Here's a more blunt breakdown of the situation:

The U.S. handed the entire case to the Canucks on a silver platter, implicating Mexican cartel elements and Chinese heavy hitters, and they didn't make a SINGLE arrest?

Source: https://notthebee.com/article/canada-fails-to-arrest-anyone-after-fbi-hands-them-details-of-fentanyl-superlab-run-by-chinese

Original Article: https://t.me/therealcanadianpatriots/167286

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

Related:

These pages contain videos that focus on the truth.

No Planes Hit Any Tower Or Building On 9/11 2001

This footage shows an non edited timeline showing the second explosion without a plane.

Another video from a different angle:

No plane a the Pentagon either. It was a missile.

Here is building 7 falling by controlled demolition. No plane or fire. Clearly detonations.

Related:

Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

This is the day when I realized the truth needed to be told by independent journalists because the mainstream media was completely full of shit. This is when my career changed from stock broker to independent journalist. I hung up the phone on clients calling me to try to profit from this event before the second building fell, and I started to research and write.

This day I saw first hand the lies of the government playing out in real time. From the live video feed of Bush at being told a "second plane" hit the twin towers in New York, while innocently reading a book to school children; the look on his face was that "It was done", not one of surprise.

This day showed for those with eyes to see, the "plane" truth that government lies. This day changed the course of history, not only for me, but for the world.

The official story was so blatantly a lie, completely full of holes and scientific impossibilities that it warped the minds of the masses - just like the covid scam (renaming the flu) did.

Buildings don't pancake collapse at free fall speed.

Bad CGI was the only evidence of any plane hitting any building.

Raw uncut footage shows the building explosions with no planes present.

News crews were announcing buildings fell that had not fallen yet.

One on the spot reporter stated there was no visible plane debris at the pentagon.

The explosive nature of the buildings collapse was clearly a controlled demolition. Also cut columns are not caused by planes, they are caused by shape charges used in controlled demolitions.

The ridiculous official narrative that still stands today is a shining example of the satanic inversion theory; that using gaslighting and propaganda, lies can remain the official word, no matter how obvious.

What Did Happen On That Day?

For those who were not watching live, or for those who have not done research; 4 false flag attacks took place, planned by our own government, executed by our own government, and covered up by our own government.

This was done to further enable the war machine and totalitarian control of the masses.

A missile hit the pentagon, and 3 buildings were brought down by pre planned, controlled demolition that took weeks to physically set up. CGI was used to blame planes hitting the towers, but no planes were used at all on any building in reality.

See for yourself:

This footage shows an non edited timeline showing the second explosion without a plane.

Another video from a different angle:

No plane a the Pentagon either. It was a missile.

Here is building 7 falling by controlled demolition. No plane or fire. Clearly detonations.

For those who know the truth, this anniversary day each year serves as a reminder that the official lie still stands because the masses choose to live in denial and the traitor perpetrators who carried out these false flag events have not been brought to justice; pathetic.

For those just learning the truth, the events on this day show government complicity in a self inflicted deadly false flag attack on its own people, and should spark you to question all government actions and narratives.

For both, the status of the narrative lie, is and will continue to be, a barometer showing the current state of the nation.

Here are some of the 9/11 articles we have published on Truth11.com:

Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

After being censorship attacked during the covid scamdemic and shut down on WordPress with 13,046 articles published on that platform; Truth11.com had to be rebuilt. On our new platform we have now published 6,000 articles, this is the 6,000th article posted!. We are truth warriors and will continue to fight, write and report to bring you the truth.

We still endure to this day massive censorship and algorithmic blacklisting. With your help we can reach more people. You can help Truth11.com by helping us fight censorship. Please Share Truth11.com with others, share our articles, share our Images + Memes, videos, documents and solutions pages.

You can also help us in our independent media mission by becoming a monthly subscriber. This is of great importance to us, as we are not funded by the government (obviously), also we do not allow any advertising or paid posts - to keep us independent and free to report the truth. It also keeps our site easy to read, free from distractions and sales pitches. Your monthly subscription for $3 or $11 (your choice) is our only ability to cover costs and we greatly appreciate the support from all of our subscribers!

You can also help us in our mission to report the truth by making a small one time donation.

Thank you Truth Warriors for being a person who wants the truth, for reading, sharing and caring.

Make A Donation (USD)

Become A Monthly Subscriber

Subscribe + Support Our Work At Truth11.com

Choose Your Subscription Amount $3 or $11 (USD) Per Month

Related:

Truth11.com Archive

Access to the Way Back Machine Snapshot of Truth11.com On The Old Platform Before It Was Shut Down To Censor The Truth.

Search Truth11.com Archive

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“America’s state religion, is ‘patriotism,’ a phenomenon which has convinced many of the citizenry that ‘treason’ is morally worse than murder or rape.” ~ William Blum

One meaningless jingoistic cliché I am subjected to constantly is “I love my country.” This gibberish for the most part is pure nonsense, and is rarely defined. When most use this term, do they love the people, land, culture, or the government? My take from all my many thousands of encounters of this phrase, is that it means I love my country right or wrong, which is pure nationalism. I say this because that is what I see and hear with my own eyes and ears. This is why many raise blood-soaked flags in honor of aggressive war. This is why most will stand hatless with their hand over their heart during the ‘national’ anthem, this is why most will pledge their dying allegiance to the State, and this is why most all perpetually worship the military and those who falsely claim to ‘serve’ the people.

They rarely if ever say I love all the people, because they do not. They rarely if ever say I love the landscape, and they rarely if ever say I love the culture. This cliché is used almost entirely under the assumption that one is showing false ‘patriotism’ to the national state, which indicates agreement with what those controlling the nation-state do in their name. This includes taxation, theft, economic destruction, inflation, regulation, mass brutal enforcement, and aggressive warmongering. In other words, as mentioned earlier, they love the State, right or wrong. This attitude is pure reverent worship of the nation and government, which is the exact opposite of honest ‘patriotism.’ Hypocrisy has already taken over at this point.

This is the epitome of what is called ‘Stockholm Syndrome,’ where the ‘citizen’ (victim) forms a psychological attachment (bond) with his captor, controller, and master; in this case, the government. To see this attitude practiced in totality, one only has to watch or attend any large sporting event. As the field-sized flag is rolled out, military jets overhead, and government soldiers on the grounds, everyone is ordered to stand, remove his hat, put his hand over his heart, and bow down to the State en masse. 80,000 will all stand at once, (to not acquiesce and go along with the tamed collective herd can be risky as I have found out many times) complying with the order they have received, while acting as if in prayer to a ‘god.’ The ‘god’ they are praying to is the so-called ‘united’ states.

This is propaganda indoctrination; this what is taught you see, almost from birth to death, from cradle to grave and generationally, beginning in government run, mandatory attendance, ‘public’ schooling environments. This brainwashing is supported by the town and city politicians, the State, the federal government, and the complicit media. This instilled worship of rule is a huge part of the lives of all, and the reason this population is so easy to dumb down and control. As so aptly stated by Jean Baudrillard: “We are dealing with a genuine Stockholm syndrome on a mass scale – when the hostage becomes the accomplice of the hostage taker – as well as a revolution of the concept of voluntary servitude and master-slave relations. When the entire society becomes an accomplice to those who took it hostage, but just as much when individuals split into, for themselves, hostage and hostage taker.” In other words, most all of you are willing slaves, and the ‘country’ you claim to love, is your lord and master, and just as Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

This is an appropriate time to bring up this subject, as blood-soaked flags are flying all around me, as those who “rally round the flag’ are showing their solidarity to their State ‘god’ on this ‘holiday’ weekend celebrating Labor Day. This is supposed to be a celebration of laborers, but in this country today, every made-up holiday is treated as — Worship the State and military warmongers day. Never miss a chance to idolize the State, but always remember that the Mafia is more honest than any government, so maybe your ‘patriotic’ idolatry is misplaced.

Now, this heinous empire called America is warring around the world, aggressively maiming and killing, all in your name and with your earnings, wealth, and the blood of your children. It is supporting genocide, and destroying your most necessary vital goods of food, water, and energy. Your savings are being depleted, and the worthless fiat currency is continually debased, as hundreds of trillions of dollars of debt continue to rise, while you await the coming collapse. The big club that you ain’t in does not care about you, does not give a damn about you, but it does want you either controlled or eliminated.

This country is coming apart at the seams, and this is happening intentionally, by design, and is conspiratorial. The agenda, the real big picture, is to form a technocratic governing system; a globalist system put into place in order to claim ownership of everything, and then implement regional universal ruling ‘authority’ zones to lord over all. To accomplish this requires a complete digitization, biometric labeling, non-cash society with digital currency, and concentration-camp environments where control becomes more manageable. The depopulation agenda is an important aspect of this plan as well, as has been telegraphed for decades, and obvious signs of this evil are already evident.

This is not just happening here, but worldwide, and simultaneously among most every country. This is a global phenomenon. This would be impossible unless controlled by a master class of criminal rulers and their pawns and partners in politics, media, and military, as has already happened during the absolute fraud of the fake ‘covid’ pandemic, where most every country on earth did the exact same things at once. You see, all this is a long-planned, structured undertaking that is now coming to fruition.

The result of this takeover plot is up to you, all of you as individuals, not as a collective horde bowing to the State as ‘god.’ Caring intimately for where you were born, your culture, and where you live is natural, but reverence for a governed nation-state reveals a much deeper insanity based on enslavement, not freedom. Americans are captured serfs at this point, dependent on a failed system of reprehensible and immoral rule.

America is now in the darkest moments of its existence, and this has happened because it was allowed to happen by the weakness and indifference of the American people, and without any legitimate resistance. Mass individual opposition is necessary if sanity and freedom are desired. Without an awakening to the fact that this country’s ruling class and government are consumed by evil and deserve no respect, without the understanding that false ‘patriotism’ is not the way forward, but the way to hell, then we all face eventual bondage, or worse, annihilation.

This ‘country’ (or any other) is not to be worshipped or idolized, it is to be lived in, enjoyed, and protected from all those who would claim rule over it. Governments, all governments, are always your captor, controller, and master, and never deserve to be associated with “love of country,” but treated with contempt. Stockholm Syndrome is complete mental instability, and ‘Statism’ is the epitome of the this mental disorder of man, where captivity is more sought than freedom.

“Nationalism is pimped out bigotry, designed to provoke a Stockholm syndrome in the livestock.” - Stefan Molyneux

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-near-entirety-of-americans-are-engulfed-by-a-nationalistic-stockholm-syndrome/

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

These pages contain videos that focus on the truth.

PrepareForChange.net | Derek Knauss

Western media, by employing double standards, censorship, deceptive language, amplifying Israeli lies and dehumanizing Palestinians, facilitates the genocide in Gaza.

Chris Hedges | substack.com/@chrishedges

The Western media manufactures consent for genocide. It normalizes Israel’s decades-long military occupation and apartheid. It erases Israel’s flagrant violations of international law. It perpetuates the fallacy of Israeli victimhood. It betrays, discredits and demonizes the work of Palestinian journalists and media workers in Gaza, at least 220 of whom have been killed by Israel between Oct. 7, 2023, and August 2025. It supinely accepts draconian Israeli censorship. It acquiesces with tepid letters of protest at Israel’s refusal to allow foreign reporters in Gaza — an effort by Israel to mask its war crimes. It amplifiesIsraeli lies, from beheaded babies to widespread sexual assaultof Israeli women on Oct. 7, to obfuscate the truth.

When writing about Gaza, verbs are in the passive tense. There is no subject. No one is accountable. Genocide, it seems, is an act of God. No different from an earthquake or tsunami. Clichés and opaque adjectives such as the “cycle of violence” or “clashes” distort and falsify reality.

“If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought,” George Orwell warned.

Terms such as “genocide,” “atrocity,” “ethnic cleansing” and “occupied territories” magically disappear from media reports on Palestinians, whose resistance is routinely described as “savage” and “barbaric.” New York Times reporters are instructed by editors to avoid terms such as “Palestine,” “genocide,” “carnage,” “refugee camp,” “slaughter” and “massacre,” when referencing Palestinians.

The media slavishly regurgitates what Israel feeds it. Saturation bombing becomes “surgical air strikes.” Israel’s weaponization of famine becomes a “food shortage.” The killing of unarmed civilians — including children — becomes “clashes.” The hilltop fortress-like compounds of Jewish colonists becomes“neighborhoods.” Extrajudicial assassination of a journalist or a doctor becomes “died.”

Genocide, referred to as the “Israel-Hamas war” is justified as “self-defense,” part of the mantra of Israel’s “right to defend itself.” When schools, hospitals, clinics, ambulances, mosques, churches and other civilian targets are obliterated, they are labeled “Hamas command centers” or targeted because Hamas is “using civilians as human shields” — something Israel does routinely, when the army binds detained Palestinians and forces them to enter potentially booby-trapped buildings and tunnelsahead of Israeli troops.

When Israelis are held by Hamas, they are “hostages,” even if they serve in the military. When Palestinians — including children — are held without charges or trial and disappeared into Israeli detention centers, where torture is “widespread” and “systematic,” they are “prisoners.”

Missile attacks on tent cities or hospitals are blamed on Palestinian armed groups firing errant rockets. If Israel acknowledges the attacks — which very rarely happens — they are described as a “tragic mistake.”

Civil institutions in Gaza are characterized as “Hamas-run” to cast doubt on the veracity of what they report. The New York Times routinely qualifies announcements from the Gaza Health Ministry by noting it “does not distinguish between civilians and combatants,” masking the slaughter of tens of thousands of civilians.

The result is some of the most convoluted writing in the history of journalism, including the Nov. 5, 2023 New York Times headline that reads: “Explosions Gazans Say Was Airstrike Leaves Many Casualties in Dense Neighborhood.”

“When Middle East Eye journalists Mohamed Salama and Ahmed Abu Aziz, along with Reuters photojournalist Hussam al-Masri, and freelancers Moaz Abu Taha, and Mariam Dagga — who had worked with several media outlets, including the Associated Press — were killed in a “double tap” strike — designed to kill first responders arriving to treat casualties from initial strikes — at Nasser Medical Complex, how did Western news agencies respond?” I asked in my column The Betrayal of Palestinian Journalists.

“Israeli military says strikes on Gaza hospital targeted what it says was a Hamas camera,” the Associated Press reported.

“IDF claims hospital strike was aimed at Hamas camera,” announced CNN.

The camera belonged to Reuters, which said Israel was “fully aware” the news agency was filming from the hospital.

“When Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al Sharif and three other journalists were killed on Aug. 10 in their media tent near Al Shifa Hospital, how was it reported in the Western press?” I asked.

“Israel Kills Al Jazeera Journalist It Says Was Hamas Leader,” Reuters titled its story, despite the fact al-Sharif was part of a Reuters team that won a 2024 Pulitzer Prize.

The German newspaper Bild, published a front page story headlined: “Terrorist disguised as a journalist killed in Gaza.”

“The linguistic gymnastics employed by the media went as far as redefining words, making them meaningless,” writes Assal Rad in “Don’t Say Palestine: How the Media Manufactured Consent for Genocide:”

Mainstream media failed to describe Israel’s repeated breaches of the ceasefire with the language of violation. Instead, the coverage followed the same patterns of rationalizing Israel’s attacks and uncritically parroting Israel’s claims to justify its actions. As Palestinians continued to be killed — during a ‘ceasefire’ — and the flow of aid did not reach the level of need or what was agreed to, Western media framed these flagrant violations as ‘tests’ or ‘challenges’ to a ‘shaky ceasefire.’ As leading human rights organizations like Amnesty International warned that the genocide was, in fact, not over, legacy media continued to frame it as a war with a ‘fragile ceasefire.’

Words matter. Words justify actions. If there is no genocide, if Israel is defending itself in a war, the U.S. and Israel’s European allies have the right to provide tens of billions of dollars in military aid. If this is a war begun by Hamas on Oct. 7 then it is possible to lament the obliteration of Gaza and mass slaughter by Israel as the regrettable result of the Hamas attack.

This corruption of language is designed, as Orwell noted, to defend the indefensible:

Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness. Defenseless villages are bombarded from the air, the inhabitants driven out into the countryside, the cattle machine-gunned, the huts set on fire with incendiary bullets: this is called pacification. Millions of peasants are robbed of their farms and sent trudging along the roads with no more than they can carry: this is called transfer of population or rectification of frontiers. People are imprisoned for years without trial, or shot in the back of the neck or sent to die of scurvy in Arctic lumber camps: this is called elimination of unreliable elements.

Adam Johnson in “How to Sell a Genocide: The Media’s Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza,” examined over 12,000 articles from The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN.com, Politico, Axios, USA Today, and The Associated Press, along with 5,000 TV segments aired on CNN and MSNBC. His carefully researched book is a damning indictment of the “liberal” media’s justification of the genocide.

CNN and The New York Times instructed their editors and journalists that attacks could only be attributed to Israel afterconfirmation from the IDF and GPS coordinates. Johnson quotes a source at CNN:

Whether it’s in the newsroom or in the field, we couldn’t credit anything to Israel unless we were held to this impossibly high bar of having to call it an “explosion,” until we geolocated the site of the explosion, sent the coordinates to the Israelis and asked them for comment.

You can see an interview with Johnson about his book at The Electronic Intifada here.

CNN journalists reporting on Israel and Palestine must submittheir work for review to the network’s Jerusalem bureau prior to airing. The CNN bureau, like all news bureaus in Israel, is required to abide by restrictions imposed by Israeli military censors.

The very few Palestinians who appear on CNN and other legacy media outlets, are routinely asked — usually before they are even permitted on air — if they “condemn” Hamas. Guests who express even tepid criticism of Israel are asked whether Israel “has a right to exist.”

No one is ever asked if they condemn Zionism, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, genocide or Israel’s 100 year war on Palestine. Nor are they asked if the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves — which under international law they do, including with weapons.

Our domesticated journalists and news organizations are, as Robert Fisk pointed out, “prisoners of the language of power.” They dutifully parrot the official lexicon. This makes them not only propagandists, but accomplices to genocide.

Those who protest the genocide, including students on university campuses — many of whom are Jewish — are smeared as “Hamas supporters” and “antisemites.” Journalists ferret out Zionist students, usually found esconced in campus Hillel houses, who claim to be “fearful for their safety,” because of the protests. The media pays little attention to the rise in anti-Muslimbigotry or the repression meted out to student protestors, which includes not only police brutality and 3,000 detainments and arrests, but suspensions, probations, expulsions, withholding of diplomas and the firing of sympathetic faculty.

Slogans which call for Palestinian liberation — including “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” — along with the Palestinian flag, have been criminalized.

The message is clear: Jewish lives matter. Palestinian lives do not.

“The reports of UN agencies, of respected human rights monitors, of medical journals, and of professional medical personnel, are generally treated with respect and given prominence in the mainstream media,” writes the historian Rashid Khalidi in the introduction to Robin Anderson’s book, “The Complicit Lens: US Media Coverage of Israel’s Genocide in Gaza:”

Not in this war: instead, if such sources are cited at all, equal media treatment is given to the outrageous slanders and calumnies against these organizations and individuals, smears that are produced in profusion by Israel’s legion of professional propagandists and its myriad of defenders in the US. Besides smearing critics of Israel’s genocide as supporters of Hamas or terrorist sympathizers, the main weapon in their arsenal of defamation is their systematic and outrageous misuse of the deadly accusation of antisemitism.

The massive defections of readers and viewers from mainstream media to social media platforms that do not filter news through the Israel lobby, the U.S. government or corporations, are a stark indicator of the media’s bankruptcy. The response to these defections has been “platformicide” — the use of algorithms, shadow banning, restriction of live streaming capabilities and the closing of accounts by social media giants such as Facebook, Instagram, X, YouTube and TikTok, to dramatically reduce the reach of reporting on Palestine.

This censorship is part of a coordinated effort to hide the horror of the genocide from the public.

By constantly referencing Oct. 7, the Western media decontextualizes the genocide. It ignores Israel’s 19-year siege of Gaza. Oct. 7 is characterized in the Western media as “unprovoked.” Israel’s massacres of unarmed Palestinians in Gaza in the winter of 2008 and 2009, along with its attacks on Gaza in 2012, 2014 and during the Great March of Return in 2018 and 2019 are ignored.

The 1948 Nakba — when European Zionists seized more than 78 percent of historic Palestine, violently expelled 750,000 Palestinians, destroyed more than 530 Palestinian villages and killed 15,000 Palestinians — is rarely referenced. Seventy percent of those driven from their homes in 1948 were forced into Gaza.

The Zionist project is predicated on fostering historical amnesia.

“Once Hamas was established as a brutal, terrorist group whose members gleefully tortured, dismembered, and beheaded babies without conscience, no further explanation was needed,” writes Anderson in her book. “The media simply avoided reporting Israel’s history of violence and as a result, establishment media also avoided the conditions of everyday life for Palestinians.”

The fiction that there is currently a ceasefire in Gaza — Israel has killed at least 1,286 Palestinians and injured 4,257 since it supposedly went into effect — has become the excuse used by Western media to turn its back on Gaza. This genocide denial has characterized the coverage since its inception. It masks not only Israel’s crimes, but Israel’s stated intention to ethnically cleanse all Palestinians from Gaza. It effectively neuters international law. And it makes a mockery of the profession of journalism.

When the last act of ethnic cleansing happens, Western media will, I am sure, continue to bombard us with Israeli agitprop, euphemisms and clichés.

It will justify the genocide until the end.

Original Article: https://prepareforchange.net/2026/09/05/how-the-media-sells-genocide/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-the-media-sells-genocide

The Great Reset | An AI Initiated False Flag Attack Could Be Used to Engineer a Global Crash to Bring About a Digital Future

John Gideon Hartnett | BibleScienceForum.com

The Great Reset, financial and everything else, is being discussed everywhere now on social media. How will the US government get itself out of bankruptcy that it now definitely is in? How will they convince the public to continue to buy its ever blooming debt in the form of Treasury bonds? How will they get us all onto the digital blockchain as the US dollar and all other currencies based on it die? Will they crash the dollar, close the banks, and confiscate your money before re-opening the banks offering you only digital tokens linked to US Treasuries and force you to use them in all commerce?

Below I sample two well informed pieces that may give you insight if the US can pull it off under the Trump dynasty. And there are only 2 years left of that as far as we now know.

Listen to this podcaster Andrei Jikh.

And read this post of how the Trump dynasty may have engineered it all and the Trump family gets the lion’s share in the “art of the deal”

The following is from The Leah Files on substack.com:

If I were president and I wanted to tank the dollar and get rich off it, here is exactly what I would do.

I would hire a Treasury Secretary who already made $3.5 billion crashing another country’s currency. I would put my guy in charge of the agency that approves bank charters. I would install a crypto czar with $200M in crypto holdings and give him an ethics waiver so nobody could challenge it.

Then I would sign an executive order banning the government from ever creating a digital dollar so there was no competition.

Then I would have my family launch their own private digital dollar. My family takes 75% of net profits. I would grow it to $4.6 billion in circulation and route a $2 billion Abu Dhabi sovereign fund deal through it to prove it works.

Then I would get Congress to pass a law requiring every stablecoin in the country to hold short-term Treasury bills. Now every dollar of my digital currency is a forced buyer of government debt. Brookings projects $2.3 trillion in captive demand by 2030.

Then I would have my OCC guy grant my family’s company a federal bank charter. Now I can issue my digital dollar with federal authority.

Then I would have my Treasury Secretary weaken the actual dollar. Bond buybacks that suppress yields but tank the currency. Build a $950 billion war chest for more. Let the debt hit $40 trillion. Dollar index drops to 99. Gold goes to highest point ever.

Then I would kill the Corporate Transparency Act and delete the FinCEN beneficial ownership database. That was the one law that required every shell company in America to report who actually owns it. Without it, nobody can trace who is buying my stablecoin, who is routing money through it, or where the profits land.

Then I would let the loop run. Weaker dollar drives demand for “stable” digital alternatives. The law I passed forces those alternatives to buy T-bills. That funds the government’s debt. My family takes profit on every transaction. Foreign central banks walking away from Treasuries get replaced by legally mandated stablecoin reserves my family controls.

Then I would use sanctions to start cutting countries off from the dollar system entirely. And when those countries need a new way to transact in dollars, the only federally chartered private digital dollar in existence is mine. They can buy it through shell companies nobody can trace because I deleted the ownership database.

I just built a toll booth on the global financial system. I take a cut every time someone uses the dollar. And I made it so nobody can see who is paying.

And every single step I just described has already happened.

So what does that mean for you and I?

The reason the United States can borrow at low rates and keep your mortgage and your car payment and your import prices stable is because foreign central banks hold trillions in dollar reserves. That system has always been public. The benefit went to everyone. Lower borrowing costs, cheaper goods , and the single biggest economic advantage any country has ever had.

What I just described is the privatization of that function. The entity buying the debt is no longer a central bank acting in the public interest. It is a private company taking 75% of net profits for one family. The reserve function used to generate a public benefit. Now it generates a private fee.

Your purchasing power shrinks every time the dollar weakens. Your 401k buys less in real terms. Everything you import costs more. And every time the dollar drops, demand for the private digital alternative goes up. The one the president’s family owns. The one that by law must buy government debt.

You absorb the cost of a weakening dollar. His family collects the profit. That is the trade.

The enforcement mechanism to stop a sitting president from doing this? There isn’t one. Former White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter says it would be a violation for literally any other federal employee, but not the president.

Nobody voted for this. No one was asked. There was no debate. There is no enforcement mechanism. There is no one investigating it. The Senate tried and it was blocked.

This is the largest conflict of interest in American history happening in broad daylight while everyone argues about something else.

So what do you do? Share this. Make it impossible to ignore. Send it to your representative, your senator, every journalist you follow. We make them answer for it. Because the only thing protecting this scheme right now is the fact that not enough people understand it yet.

From this you can easily see how a “mark of the beast” digital control prison can be implemented. No walls are needed if the centralised oligarchs have control of all credit. We become serfs in their new system slaving away to pay down the global debt that runs into many tens of trillions of dollars.

Resist it! Do not comply! I for one will not comply!

Source: https://substack.com/@theleahfiles/note/c-322031653

Original Article: https://biblescienceforum.com/2026/09/04/the-great-reset-an-ai-initiated-false-flag-attack-could-be-used-to-engineer-a-global-crash-to-bring-about-a-digital-future/

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“People conspire, that’s not a theory.” ~ Michael Palmero

Never has such an asinine term had such an impact against truth as the use of the thought-destroying phrase “conspiracy theory.” While bought and paid for Statist ‘fact-checkers’ would attempt to hold harmless the government’s role in this fraudulent word coup, especially the CIA; that criminal and covert operation that was directly responsible for fully weaponizing this damning term, knew exactly what they were doing. This happened in the 60s in order to stop anyone from questioning the narrative or seeking the truth about those who conspired and murdered JFK. The Warren Commission was a fraud, and a coverup that required psychological conditioning of the indoctrinated ‘public,’ hence, the usage of this term was successfully exploited. The deceitful use of the phrase ‘conspiracy theorist’ has been a propagandized lie-supporting tactic for the past 50 plus years, especially since the 9/11 false flag conspiracy.

‘Conspiracy theory’ is a term that strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. (Now, writers, podcasters, whistleblowers, and truth-tellers) Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events as off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States, raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs… CIA Document 1035-960 played a definitive role in making the ‘conspiracy theory’ term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question. – From CIA Document 1035-960

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” ~ William Casey, Ronald Reagan’s first CIA Director  

This is so obviously ad hominem that it should be laughable, but considering its long-term effectiveness, one must understand the power of psychological manipulation of the weak, indoctrinated, and moldable minds of simpleton Americans. As a matter of fact, name-calling as a form of silencing, which is the exclusive motive of the term ‘conspiracy theory,’ even by the narcissistic moron Trump in the White House, is now a common form of what I refer to as openly gross and manipulative brainwashing.

The word ‘conspire,’ the root of conspiracy, means to aspire or plan maliciously, agree together (2 or more people) to commit a criminal or reprehensible act; to agree, unite, plot, literally to breathe together. Theory from Latin and Greek means conception, perception, contemplation, speculation. In reality, these two terms, while independently sound, do not go together in the sense in which they are viewed today. The term ‘conspiracy theory’ as a concept, is contradictory, because it is used strictly as a weapon against speech. It relies on the ability to promote the refusal to question, to debate, to argue, or vet out the truth. It is a plotted condemnation effect, this a conspiracy in and of itself, which destroys the validity of this manufactured and bastardized response.  

Real conspiracy abounds everywhere and constantly, especially where any ruling class, government, controlled or fake alternative media, or criminal behavior is apparent. What this boils down to is only name-calling; to dismiss, to shun, to marginalize, to silence, to condemn, to embarrass, to disallow questioning, to destroy free thought and speech, and to stop all intellectual curiosity, it is painfully obvious that the use of this term is entirely dishonest.

To address this honestly, would be to properly describe the use of the term ‘conspiracy theory,’ as nothing more than aggression and opposition to any and all rebellion of the individual, and an affront to anyone who questions tyranny, illegitimate false authority, (which is all authority) and anyone questioning or objecting to any abusive government or rule. Basically, any who desire real freedom are hated and feared by those in power, and those non-thinking fools who use this term in order to silence the truth.

There is a quote that the main thing about ‘conspiracy theory,’ is that ‘conspiracy theorists’ believe in a conspiracy because it is more comforting. What is comical about this ridiculous quote, is that it is exactly backward. Those who accept that conspiracies are a fact of life, those who understand that collusion among others in order to fool or harm, are not looking for comfort, but those who refuse to see any truth, those who yell ‘conspiracy theory’ at every turn in order to stop debate, are the ones actually seeking false “comfort” so that they do not have to face any personal responsibility.

There is another quote misattributed to George Orwell, that states: “In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”This is absolutely correct, but ‘revolutionary’ acts, common dissent, and any disobedience to illegitimate authority, is seen by the hordes of serfs who make up most of this population, a risk to their dependence on the State, so therefore they hide from the truth as if it is their enemy. This leads to this exact discussion, of attacking any who call out the corruption of the ruling class, by simply calling names such as ‘conspiracy theorist’ and hiding their heads deep in the sand so as not to upset their ignorance or expose their cowardice in the face of totalitarian rule and corruption.

There are many terms used as ad hominem ‘arguments’ in order to dissuade conspiracy realists from discussing taboo subjects or calling out obvious conspiracy, unconscionable behavior, tyrannical governance, individual and State evil, exposing false flags, and labeling people in order to box them into a uncomfortable position within society in order to squelch dissent. A few of these that irritate me are the ‘pill’ descriptions, red, white, and black. There is the idiotic Trump MAGA crowd protection method of claiming someone has TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) as if this is a legitimate or constructive way of discussion. I have been said to be afflicted with this BS more times than I can count. Crazy, insane, mentally unstable, psychotic, tin foil hat wearer, anti-vax, ‘anti-Semitic,’ and of course truthtellers are constantly barraged with a hundred others.

As is already happening, many who call out these real conspiracies by the ruling class and government, among other players, are being singled out, threatened, fined, fired from employment, de-banked, shadow-banned, jailed, or even killed. This is becoming much more prevalent around the world, and is already here in the U.S., especially for high level or sensitive information released or discussed in open forums, or speaking out directly against top position politicians and their exploits. This will only get worse as the one-world governing system goes forward without real resistance.

And yes, I am a conspiracy realist, and yes, real conspiracy is alive and well, especially in this U.S. cultist government cabal. “Of course, all clandestine state-sponsored secret service agencies (like the CIA, MI6 and the Mossad) routinely and shamelessly make use of lies, secrecy, deception and false flag operations in their daily affairs. It is a fact of life for such secret agencies and it is all accomplished in the name of “national security”.

“No matter how paranoid or conspiracy minded you are, what the government is actually doing is worse than you can imagine.” ~ William Blum

Reference link documentary: “Dissent Into Madness”

Image Source: Original meme Ghibli styled by ChatGTP [Edited]

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/anti-conspiracy-fanatics-psychologically-brainwashed-wards-of-the-state/

Gary D. Barnett | garydbarnett.com

“No one rules if no one obeys” ~ David Icke

If I was weak, I would ask to be forgiven for my brutal and accusatory candor, but I need not, and desire not, any forgiveness. It is my assumption that telling the truth regardless of any ill will or hurt feelings it may generate, is always literally my only intent. I will never compromise, or soften the truth in order to massage weakness, cowardice, or pathetic victimization attitudes. As anyone who knows or understands me is aware, I am no doomsdayer, nor am I cynical, I am strictly a teller of truth, regardless of how uncomfortable that may be to those who desire to hide, and do nothing to help or save themselves from this heinous State that has consumed and gained control over the minds of this obedient proletariat mass. I will accept no label of the idiotic term ‘black pill,’ as that is intentionally ad hominem, and therefore cheap and offensive to any honest thinking individual.

The fate that most of you have voluntarily accepted, is that of a slave, which means that the fault lies with any and all who have willingly allowed this system of rule to exist in any form, with the insane notion that ‘choosing’ a master to lord over you is somehow in your best interest. In this case, government, all government and anyone in it, plays the role of master, so acceptance of this government, voting to instil this government, support for this government and its murderous wars and military, and the failing of securing your own freedom, leaves all the blood on your hands. Without your support, obedience, and compliance of this fraudulent ‘authority,’ it would not exist, and therefore, you would be set free. The long quote below by Étienne de La Boétie in “The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude,” explains in explicit and exact detail why the people in this country have of their own doing been relegated to eternal servitude:

“Poor, wretched, and stupid peoples, nations determined on your own misfortune and blind to your own good! You let yourselves be deprived before your own eyes of the best part of your revenues; your fields are plundered, your homes robbed, your family heirlooms taken away. You live in such a way that you cannot claim a single thing as our own; and it would seem that you consider yourselves lucky to be loaned your property, your families, and your very lives. All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. … Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves? You sow crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows—to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labour in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him stronger and the mightier to hold you in check. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not be taking action, but merely by willing to be free. Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces.”

Let us pause for a moment and reflect on these words of wisdom. The ruling class and its state pawns in government cannot exist, cannot steal your wealth, cannot use and kill your children as fodder for their murderous wars, cannot surveil your every move, cannot steal your land and property, cannot destroy your family, cannot lock you in your own home prisons, and cannot control you unless you willingly allow that to happen. How simple is the solution then, if all you have to do individually and en masse, is to support this abominable government no more. The real rulers you see, those called the “deep state,” can only survive and control you if an accepted government middleman is in place to command and hold dominion over your lives. Without that conduit of assumed ‘authority,’ the ruling class could be banished, and the government made impotent.

This will never happen with any petitioning or collective protest of government. A slave does not petition his master to not be his master. Once a people are under the forceful ruling thumb of government, any petition of same government is in direct contradiction to sanity. Rulers do not give up their power to those it controls due to begging or vote. Political protest, especially violent protest, achieves nothing, and in fact strengthens the state, and causes abominable force, increased surveillance, strengthened bogus ‘laws’ and enforcement, and state violence against the people becomes more accepted by the rest of the timid crowd of cowardly sheep. Holding a sign, chanting, screaming slogans, marching, and harming private property and the liberty of others, cannot and will not bring any relief from tyranny, but it will certainly enhance it as has been evident for generations. When crowds gather, when collectivist swarms are present, all critical thinking ceases to exist. Only individuals retain intellect and control, while herds follow along trying to avoid individual dissent and social condemnation by staying in the crowd.

Everything of value concerning freedom of the individual is based on the concept of self-ownership. “Only you own your own life,” this the core of natural human rights. To give up this personal ownership is an acceptance that “another person has a higher claim to your life than you do.” Your life is yours and yours alone, so to allow any individual or ‘governing’ body to possess claim over you, means your life is not yours. Your life is your property alone, your property therefore, belongs to you alone. No one has any right to your life, and you have no right to another’s life; meaning that no one can delegate a right to rule you, because no one has any right to rule another. This fact alone means that no government claiming any right over any individual is legitimate, and in fact it is criminal.

Since you own your own life, it is your duty and right to defend your life against any who would aggress against you in any manner whatsoever. The initiation of force in self-defense is legitimate in this case, as no man and no government has any right to claim ownership of you or your property in any way. Because of this, each is fully responsible for himself, and has no right to the property of others. If you want freedom, claim ownership of your own life, and refrain from interference in the life of any other unless all is mutually voluntary and non-aggressive.

“The truth is, one who seeks to achieve freedom by petitioning those in power to give it to him has already failed, regardless of the response. To beg for the blessing of “authority” is to accept that the choice is the master’s alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a slave.” ~ Larken Rose

Image Source: Original meme concept Ghibli styled using ChatGTP [Edited]

Original Article: https://www.garydbarnett.com/the-absolute-impossibility-to-hide-or-collectively-protest-as-a-solution-to-tyranny/

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

Paul Craig Roberts

The show trial of a somewhat arbitrarily selected group of 21 surviving Nazis at Nuremberg during 1945-46 was US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson’s show. Jackson was the chief prosecutor. As a long-time admirer of Jackson, I always assumed that he did a good job.

My admiration for Jackson stems from his defense of law as a shield of the people rather than a weapon in the hands of government, and from his defense of the legal principle known as mens rea, that is, that crime requires intent. I often cite Jackson for his defense of these legal principles that are the very foundation of liberty. Indeed, I cited Jackson in my recent July 31 column. His defense of law as a check on government power plays a central role in the book that I wrote with Lawrence Stratton, The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

In 1940 Jackson was US Attorney General. He addressed federal prosecutors and warned them against “picking the man and then putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm—in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense—that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views or being personally obnoxious to, or in the way of, the prosecutor himself.”

Later as a Supreme Court justice Jackson overturned a lower court conviction of a person who had no idea, or any reason to believe, that he had committed a crime.

Having just finished reading David Irving’s book Nuremberg (1996), I am devastated to learn that in his pursuit of another principle, at Nuremberg Jackson violated all of the legal principles for which I have so long admired him. To be clear, at Nuremberg Jackson was in pursuit of Nazis, but their conviction was the means to his end—the establishment of the international legal principle that the initiation of war, the commitment of military aggression, was a crime.

The main problem with the trials is that WW II was started by the British with their declaration of war against Germany, not by Germany.

Another problem was that at Nuremberg people were tried on the basis of ex post facto law—law that did not exist at the time of their actions for which they were convicted.

Moreover, the sentence—death by hanging—was decided prior to the trial and prior to the selection of defendants.

Moreover, the defendants were chosen and then a case was made against them.

Exculpatory evidence was withheld. Charges on which defendants were convicted turned out to be untrue.

The trials were so loaded in favor of the prosecution that defense was pro forma.

The defendants were abused and some were tortured.

The defendants were encouraged to give false witness against one another, which for the most part the defendants refused to do, with Albert Speer being the willing one. His reward was a prison sentence rather than death.

The defendants’ wives and children were arrested and imprisoned. To Jackson’s credit, this infuriated him.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, General Eisenhower, and Winston Churchill thought that surviving Nazis should be shot without trial. Roosevelt laughed about liquidating 50,000 German military officers. Eisenhower told Lord Halifax that Nazi leaders should be shot while trying to escape, the common euphemism for murder. Russians spoke of castrating German men and breeding German women to annihilate the German race. US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau wanted to reduce Germany to an agrarian society and send able-bodied Germans to Africa as slaves to work on “some big TVA project.”

Robert Jackson saw in these intentions not only rank criminality among the allied leadership but also a missed opportunity to create the legal principle that would criminalize war, thus removing the disaster of war from future history. Jackson’s end was admirable, but the means required bypassing Anglo-American legal principles.

Jackson got his chance, perhaps because Joseph Stalin vetoed execution without trial. First a show trial, Stalin said, to demonstrate their guilt so that we do not make martyrs out of Nazis.

Whom to select for the list of 21-22 persons to be charged? Well, whom did the allies have in custody? Not all those they desired. They had Reichsmarschall Herman Göring who headed the air force. Whatever the valid charges against Göring, they were not considered to be mitigated by the fact that under Göring the German air force was mainly used against enemy formations on the battleground and not, like the US and British air forces in saturation terror bombing of civilian cities, such as Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, or by the fact that in Hitler’s final days Hitler removed Göring from all his positions, expelled him from the party, and ordered his arrest.

The Nuremberg trials are paradoxical in that the law Jackson intended to establish applied to every country, not to Germany alone. The ex post facto law under which Germans were sentenced to death and to prison also criminalized the terror bombing of German and Japanese cities by the British and US air forces. Yet, the law was only applied to the Germans in the dock. In his book, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden (1995), Irving quotes US General George C. McDonald’s dissent from the directive to bomb civilian cities such as Dresden. Gen. McDonald characterized the directive as the “extermination of populations and the razing of cities,” war crimes under the Nuremberg standard.

They had foreign minister Ribbentrop. They had field marshals Keitel and Jodl and the grand-admirals Raeder and Dönitz. They had a German banker, who was saved from sentencing by the intervention of the Bank of England. They had a journalist. They had Rudolf Hess who had been in a British prison since 1941 when he went to Britain on a peace mission to end the war. They wanted an industrialist, but Krupp was too old and ill. He was devoid of the persona of a foreboding evil. You can read the list in Irving’s book.

Göring knew from the beginning that the trial was a hoax and that his death sentence had already been decided. He had the means (a poison capsule) throughout his imprisonment to commit suicide, thus depriving his captors of their planned humiliation of him. Instead, he held the Germans together, and they stood their ground. Possessed of a high IQ, time and again he made fools of his captors. He made such a fool of Robert Jackson during his trial that the entire court burst out in laughter. Jackson never lived down being bested in the courtroom by Göring.

And Göring wasn’t through with making his captors look foolish and incompetent. He, the field marshalls and grand admiral requested that they be given a military execution by firing squad, but the pettiness of the Tribunal wanted them hung like dogs. Göring told his captors that he would allow them to shoot him, but not hang him, and a few minutes before he was to be marched to the gallows before the assembled press and cameras he took the poison capsule, throwing the execution propaganda show into chaos. To this injury he added insult leaving the prison commandant, US Col. Andrus a note telling him that he had had 3 capsules. One he had left for the Americans to find, thus causing them to think his means of escaping them had been removed. One he had taken minutes prior to his show execution, and he described where to find the third. He had easily defeated the continuous and thorough inspections inflicted upon him from fear that he would commit suicide and escape their intended propaganda use of his execution.

There was a time in Anglo-American law when the improprieties of the Nuremberg trials would have resulted in the cases being thrown out of court and the defendants freed. Even under the ex post facto law and extra-judicial, extra-legal terms under which the defendants were tried, at least two of the condemned deserved to be cleared.

It is not clear why Admiral Donitz was sentenced to 10 years in prison. The chief American judge of the Tribunal, Francis Biddle, said: “It is, in my opinion, offensive to our concept of justice to punish a man for doing exactly what one has done himself.” “The Germans,” Biddle said, “fought a much cleaner war at sea than we did.“

Jodl, who countermanded many Nazi orders, was sentenced to death. The injustice of the sentence was made clear by a German court in 1953 which cleared Jodl of all Nuremberg charges and rehabilitated him posthumously. 

The French justice at the Nuremberg Tribunal said at the time that Jodl’s conviction was without merit and was a miscarriage of justice.

The entire Nuremberg proceeding stinks to high heaven. Defendants were charged with aggression for the German invasion of Norway. The fact was kept out of the trial that the British were about to invade Norway themselves and that the Germans, being more efficient, learned of it and managed to invade first.

Defendants were accused of using slave labor, paradoxical in view of the Soviets own practice. Moreover, while the trials were in process the Soviets were apparently gathering up able-bodied Germans to serve as slave labor to rebuild their war-torn economy.

Defendants were accused of mass executions despite the fact that the Russians, who were part of the prosecution and judgment of the defendants, had executed 15,000 or 20,000 Polish officers and buried them in a mass grave. Indeed, the Russians insisted on blaming the Germans on trial for the Katyn Forest Massacre.

Defendants were accused of aggression against Poland, and Ribbentrop was not permitted to mention in his defense the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact that divided Poland between Germany and the Soviet Union, without which Germany could not have attacked Poland. The fact that the Soviets, who were sitting at Nuremberg in judgment on the Germans, had themselves invaded Poland was kept out of the proceedings.

It goes on from here endlessly.  The Nuremberg Trials stand as the worst injustice in Western judicial history.  It served to cover up the war crimes of the allies and to magnify out of all proportion those of Germany.

Original Article: https://paulcraigroberts.org/tyranny-at-nuremberg-2/

Telegram | Forbidden Truth

For 45 years, the world called her a living saint.
Mother Teresa. Nobel Peace Prize. Blessed by three Popes. Worshipped by billions.

She was running the largest child trafficking pipeline in history.
And the Vatican knew.

THE CALCUTTA OPERATION
Between 1962 and 1997, Teresa's Missionaries of Charity processed over 3 million orphans through 517 homes in 100+ countries.

Exposed records show:

• Babies taken from mothers who were told their children died at birth.
• Adoption papers signed by nuns with no government oversight.
• Children shipped to wealthy families in Europe and America for $15,000 to $50,000 each.
• Estimated annual revenue: $50 to $100 million. Tax-free. Unaudited. Untraceable.

She didn't save those children. She sold them.

THE CONNECTIONS THEY HID

• Baby Doc Duvalier — Haitian dictator. Gave Teresa access to orphanages across Haiti. The same Haiti that feeds children into the Epstein pipeline today.
• Charles Keating — Criminal banker. Donated $1.25 million to Teresa. She wrote a personal letter to the judge begging for his release. The money came from stolen savings of 23,000 Americans.
• Robert Maxwell — Father of Ghislaine Maxwell. Media mogul. Connected to Teresa through Vatican fundraising channels. His daughter became Epstein's chief recruiter.
• Hillary Clinton — Co-founded a toddler home in Washington DC with Teresa in 1995. The home was quietly shut down in 2012. No records of where the children went.

THE VATICAN VAULT
In 2017, Indian police raided a Missionaries of Charity home in Ranchi.
They found nuns selling babies for $1,800 each.
The Vatican's response? Silence.
Pope Francis fast-tracked Teresa's sainthood in 2016 — one year BEFORE the raid. They canonized her to make her untouchable.

The Vatican Bank processed $8 billion in anonymous donations through Teresa's network between 1970 and 1997. No receipts. No records. No questions.

Where did the money go?

Where did the children go?

Same answer. Same network. Same people.

THE EPSTEIN CONNECTION

Haiti → Dominican Republic → Virgin Islands.

This was Epstein's route. But it was Teresa's route 30 years earlier.

The orphanages she built became the supply chain for what came after.

Brunel used her agencies. Maxwell used her contacts. Epstein used her infrastructure.

She built the machine. They just turned it on.

The Nobel Prize. The sainthood. The hospitals named after her.

All of it — a cover for the greatest child trafficking operation ever constructed.

3 million orphans. Zero accountability. One "saint."

The truth doesn't care about your feelings.

Original Article: https://t.me/c/3233625802/176

Related:

Child Trafficker Mother Teresa Was Anthony Fauci’s Mother

TheAwakeNation.com

New bombshell [2020] intel reveals that Dr. Anthony Fauci is the son of the late Mother Teresa, who was a child trafficker for Jeffrey Epstein!

WELCOME TO THE FALL OF THE FALSE IDOLS: We all know the name Mother Teresa. She won a Nobel Peace Prize for her so-called humanitarian work and founded the Missionaries of Charity.

When She was on her world tour she gathered millions (rumored to be billions) of dollars from the rich, because they foolishly believed that she would be able to help the poor and suffering in India. Many people would believe that India was and currently is eternally grateful to her. How wrong they are! But what did she really do with all that money? It surely wasn’t used to improve the conditions of the suffering. Mother Teresa was not a living saint and in fact was somewhat morally corrupt — with a lot of evidence.

Mother Teresa’s money was mostly spent on funding Pedophilia and child rape, and not on the poor. She built a hundred facilities all over the world with her name and organization ‘Missionaries of Charity’ on each one. Most of them were nunneries and Papist-run children’s homes. where millions of children were abused, beaten and sodomised on a daily basis.

Many of these children were brainwashed and conditioned into cult-like-thinking, to make them act like her, thus sprang her “cult of suffering.” Ever wondered why the Catholic Church rushed to canonize Mother Teresa after her death? Turns out she was a child trafficker, selling babies & funneling between $50-100 million/year to the Vatican. Mother Teresa’s connections include Baby Doc Duvalier, the Haitian dictator, Saving’s and Loan criminal Charles Keating, and Robert Maxwell, the father of Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex trafficking partner, Ghislaine Maxwell. And here’s the kicker! Mother Teresa opened the D.C. based Home for Infant Children with none other than Hillary Clinton. This orphanage of sorts was quietly closed in 2012.

Original Article: https://theawakenation.com/satanism/child-trafficker-mother-teresa-was-anthony-faucis-mother/

These pages contain videos that focus on the truth.