“Is there any point in public debate in a society where hardly anyone has been taught how to think, while millions have been taught what to think?” ~ Peter Hitchens
One wonders how we got to where we are today; a society of non-critical thinkers, non-thinkers period, relying on the State as if a parent or god, fully dependent on this failed system of corruption, indoctrination, and control over every aspect of life. This begins with turning over children as young as toddlers to the State and its atrocious brainwashing schooling monstrosity falsely called the ‘public education’ system, where every child is treated the same, taught not to think but to obey, and not to question but only accept. This is the beginning of what becomes a lifetime of mediocrity, that leads to a caged-mind existence of coerced or even voluntary slavery.
In a society based upon this model, division among the serfs is mandatory, and easily accomplished once one is subject to the brainwashing that begins almost from birth. Division in family, division among race, division among classes, conformity of the collective herd at every level; all this leading to a disconnected system based on violence and fear. History and tradition are marginalized, rewritten, hidden, or erased, so that the entirety of society thinks life is, and always has been, what it is in the present.
Once this level of ignorance and indifference is reached, due in part to horrible processed foods, poisons, toxic spraying, and deadly injections, ill health is the result, which then leads to a life dependent on a heinous medical system doling out lethal prescription drugs; drugs that maim and kill mind and body, leaving but a molded, non-questioning, burned out, and intellectually empty shell of a man. Autonomous man has disappeared in favor of a collective creature, void of morality, self-responsibility, empathy, and humanitarian behavior; leaving a dominated machine-like drone cognizant only of an accepted, all-powerful ‘authority.’
Look around and most of what you will see is extreme division, blanket hate, fear-based existence, immoral lifestyles, mass confusion, blank stares, and psychological chaos. This is the America of today. It was no accident, and was a plotted outcome for well over the past century. After dumbing down one generation after another, basically generational brainwashing, the task of controlling an entire population became a much easier undertaking, as the elimination of the individual brought about a nationwide herd mentality based on compliance and obedience to false ‘authority.’ Independence has been replaced by mob-think, and when people gather as one, intellectual curiosity and intelligent thought disappear. This is the scourge of collectivist ‘thinking,’ which rules out intellectual honesty.
Populations at large, and not just the younger generations, have given themselves completely over to technology. In essence, they are owned, monitored, recorded, surveilled, and consumed by AI, the internet of things, cell phones, gaming, and social media. The tech and AI masters it seems, have captured most of society in the clutches of a neo-feudal algorithmic ghetto. When this happens, normal communications, personal interaction, organic relationships, and family are sacrificed for a virtual reality existence, where artificial lifestyles replace meaningful association. What is most troubling is that this form of existence is now considered the norm, and not understood by most to be the destruction of the human mind, body, and soul.
In real terms, this is the theft of humanity as it has existed over thousands of years; all being replaced by cold, machine-like drones conditioned to “own nothing and be happy.” None of this is new, and has been incrementally advanced for decades, but the current acceleration of this process is astounding to say the least, and must be stopped if any sanity is to return to ‘modern’ man.
Since 2024, Flock cameras have expanded from a few hundred to well over 120,000 in 49 states, this according to Flock’s own claims. This is just one type of mass surveillance, but there are many more. The digitization of society and all its functions are a direct threat to every single person in this country. By last count, there are now 4,000 to 5,400 data centers in the U.S. alone, and that number is still growing, so obviously, data on every single man, woman, and child is being captured, analyzed, and stored. Every communication device is constantly monitored, and with full and monetary digitization completion, everyone’s activities, financial transactions, movement, and behavior will be captured, and all of us and our activities will become programmable. If (when) this happens, this will truly be a slave society, fully controlled 24 hours a day. This is what tyrannical evil looks like, and it is now already at your doorstep, but I have not even scratched the surface of the totalitarian madness that is now happening.
None of this could have happened unless this population at large had been dumbed down, brainwashed, and indoctrinated for generations, causing dominance by the ruling element and government to expand to such an extent as to allow the few to take control of the hundreds of millions without so much as a whimper. In fact, much of the ‘voting’ population continues to laud and support this system that is continually building digital prisons to control all; in other words, the people of this country are voluntarily building their own cages.
As John Taylor Gatto stated: “Regimentation, methodization, systematization, standardization, organization, coordination, disciplined arrangements, conformity — these things are at the very heart of our national state policies, and are the poison that has killed our families and left individual survivors in a numbed, angry, nearly hysterical condition.”
I have barely mentioned all that is coming; this given the gross weather manipulation, the spraying of toxic poisons, deadly injections, the total surveillance state, programmable digital currency, plotted and staged wars, depopulation efforts, democide, genocide, famine, intentional water and energy ‘shortages,’ and the ever-increasing hyper-inflationary environment.
Much, if not most, of the fault lies with the people, and only the people can change this course we now face. After decades of watching the complete deterioration of this country, my optimism going forward is almost non-existent, and that is why I continue to write and warn about the looming catastrophic collapse and reset that is bound to happen unless large numbers of Americans decide en masse to “not take it anymore!”
Either disobey, dissent, do not comply with this tyranny, and learn to live as an individual, or be relegated to being a slave in the technocratic prison state being built around you.
“Schooling that children are forced to endure—in which the subject matter is imposed by others and the “learning” is motivated by extrinsic rewards and punishments rather than by the children’s true interests—turns learning from a joyful activity into a chore, to be avoided whenever possible. Coercive schooling, which tragically is the norm in our society, suppresses curiosity and overrides children’s natural ways of learning. It also promotes anxiety, depression and feelings of helplessness that all too often reach pathological levels. ~ Peter O. Gray
“A central problem with the idea that wars are needed to combat evil is that there is nothing more evil than war. War causes more suffering and death than anything war can be used to combat.” ~ David Swanson, War Is A Lie
The first matter of great importance and honest understanding is that there is no such thing as a ‘defensive’ war. What should follow then, is that no war can ever be against evil, given that war is the epitome of evil. Actual justified self-defense by any individual or group of individuals, regardless of the size and scope of the mass, is warranted only to quell a threat, but any war waged by states or nations, is a war against all, and therefore not defensive, but offensive aggression against innocents. If national war could ever be accepted as legitimate, then the individual rulers and politicians seeking to wage war would fight only among themselves instead of murdering innocents and using the children of others as fodder for their warmongering and power-seeking efforts.
Wars are always based on lies and deception. War is born from a political angle, corporate and military industrial complex standpoint, profit-seeking, and power and control aspirations. There is nothing organic about war and those pursuing war. All wars are avoidable; no wars are based on benevolence. There are no heroes or ‘patriots’ in war, wars are never ‘won,’ but always lost where the masses are concerned, and wars are always planned in advance (as well as during and after) and staged in order to achieve nefarious agendas. All wars are heinous and evil because they are done strictly for money, power, and control of people, finance, and geopolitical positioning.
The vile, and immoral depravity of war is achieved by back-door deals among the major players, regardless of the false pretense of good against evil, or the ridiculous ‘enemy’ of the state notion. Since collusion is always present, orchestrated madness is the result. The so-called problems of war, and therefore the so-called ‘advantages’ of war, are intentionally structured to achieve certain outcomes that benefit only the super-rich shadow government, the ruling class and its political pawns, and its banking and corporate heads. A mostly secret hierarchy controls the entire system, which is vastly compartmentalized, so that this secret society of power is always protected and held harmless.
Wars, in large part certainly, have allowed for a massive concentration of wealth in the hands of the tiny few of less than 1% of the population. This is not due to ‘capitalism,’ as some would suggest, because the core of real capitalism is free markets, which do not exist. The U.S., while showing many aspects of socialism and communism, (forget democracies and republics as they are stepping stones to totalitarianism) is actually more a war-mongering fascist state. I think this is without question at this time in history. But that should not be a surprise, as we currently live in a coordinated international fascist system that is bent on becoming the ultimate fascist State; a world run by the very powerful few, who are mostly hidden oligarchs seeking international technocratic rule.
Current sentiment incorrectly chooses to treat the word fascist as merely a “linguistic weapon” meant to be used against any opponent, political or otherwise. This thinking, while convenient for those attempting to marginalize this realistic descriptive term, is incorrect in my view. Fascism rests on the idea of heavily enforceable authoritarian rule, and that is exactly what we now have in this country and around the world. Also, fascism in essence, is the perpetuation of eternal war, and claims the impossibility of any lasting peace. This is the epitome of the U.S. empire.
“Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. It thus repudiates the doctrine of Pacifism — born of a renunciation of the struggle and an act of cowardice in the face of sacrifice. War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have courage to meet it. All other trials are substitutes, which never really put men into the position where they have to make the great decision — the alternative of life or death….”
“The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. The conception of the Liberal State is not that of a directing force, guiding the play and development, both material and spiritual, of a collective body, but merely a force limited to the function of recording results: on the other hand, the Fascist State is itself conscious and has itself a will and a personality — thus it may be called the “ethic” State….”
“…The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a ‘sufficient’ margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone….”
The premeditated and staged insanity of war, all war, including WWI and WWII, is the mainstay of American ideology. The worship of the military and all those who murder on orders is beyond obvious in this country, as anyone with eyes can see. Real ‘patriotism’, which is reliant on standing against the State and its assault on freedom, not supporting it, is completely absent, as reverence for government and the military is rampant even to this day; as in “I love my country, right or wrong.”
The U.S. has been at war, aggressive war and slaughter, for nearly 100% of its existence, and all these wars were pre-planned, and based on enriching the wealthy at the expense of non-existent enemies, while using and endangering the domestic population. All were and are abhorrent ruses, and based on detestable lies. The current Ukraine/Russia ‘war,’ and the fake Middle East ‘war’ involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran, and all other U.S. involvement in ‘war’ and conflict across the world, is pure fabricated deception.
Unabashed support by a weak people of the State or nation, of its enforcement goons in the military, of its actions, regardless of the heinous nature of such actions, lays the entire groundwork for a captured society; more accurately described as an enslaved society. A society that has accepted rule, in this case, fascist rule to be more clear, has abandoned all aspects of individuality in favor of a collective herd of sheep, simply awaiting slaughter. Without the individual, freedom is impossible, and consuming authoritative control is imminent.
Perpetual war means perpetual bondage. All war is planned and structured in order to strengthen only the State, at the deadly expense of the people. We live in a country that lives and breathes constant aggressive war. The insanity of this madness lies at the feet of all those who support and participate in this country’s governing system.
As I have said in the past; To hell with the claimed ruling ‘elite,’ to hell with this heinous government, and any who wish to steal our freedom, our families, and our very lives!
“We are, in other words, a state which controls all forces acting in nature. We control political forces, we control moral forces we control economic forces, therefore we are a full-blown Corporative state. We stand for a new principle in the world, we stand for sheer, categorical, definitive antithesis to the world of democracy, plutocracy, free-masonry, to the world which still abides by the fundamental principles laid down in 1789.” (Mussolini speech before the new Naútional Directory of the Party, April 7, 1926, in Discorsi del 1926, Milano, Alpes, 1927, p. 120).
Truth11 Films 5th short film: We have been tricked into fighting perpetual wars of mass genocide for pointless profit. There is no enemy. The enemy is within the US government. All exterior enemies are created to justify the advancing military industrial complex.
There is only one way war will end. The masses must rise up, unite, and demand world peace.
This film contains the footage released by Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange.
The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.
Elites Are Claiming The World's Water Supply & Plan To Trade It
Tyler Durden | zerohedge.com
Patti Johnson | glorytogodstudio.com
Yep, you heard me right. This is not a joke or exaggeration. The facts are out there for all to see. I wrote about the tokenization of nature in my article “From Blockchain to Ball and Chain: Are We Being Borged?”
This article will deal primarily with the tokenization of the world’s water supply.
Tokenization: Turning Life Itself into a Tradeable Chip
For those who do not understand tokenization, here is a short and simple explanation: Tokenization means turning something real, like a share of water rights, a measured volume of water from a river or aquifer, or even credits for water that was “saved” or recycled, into a digital token (a unique digital certificate) that lives on a blockchain.
A blockchain is simply a shared digital notebook that many computers keep identical copies of at the same time, so the records of who owns what cannot be secretly changed by any one person or company.
That token can then be bought, sold, or traded on markets the same way people trade stocks or other assets. Instead of water simply belonging to the land, the local community, or the people who rely on it, it becomes a financial product that large investors, corporations, and institutions can own fractions of and exchange for profit. The right to use, claim, offset, or trade that water becomes the commodity.
Offset means making up for the water you use by helping save or restore the same amount somewhere else. A farmer switches to drip irrigation, a project restores a wetland, or a company reuses treated wastewater. That saved or restored water is measured and turned into credit. You buy or claim the credit. On paper your water use is balanced.
How Dare They Profit from Stealing Our Water
How dare they make money off this corrupt plan to steal, control, measure and meter the world’s water supply. Yes, I sound like Greta. The irony is thick: the same girl who made “How dare you” famous has been thoroughly programmed to cheer for Agenda 2030 and the very control grid she should be screaming against. Since she refuses to use her catchphrase where it actually belongs, then I will.
Water is the foundation of life itself. Every human, every animal, every plant depends on it. Yet the same elites who lecture the public about scarcity and climate are building the machinery to turn every last drop into a tradable asset they can profit from while ordinary people face rationing and surveillance.
This is exactly the process already described and promoted in official reports. Goldman Sachs itself published “Securing and Financing the Future of Water” in 2026, openly stating that tokenization can turn water rights into traceable tokens that track use across markets and deliver credits for companies that conserve or recycle water through connections to flow meters. Read it yourself: https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/securing-and-financing-the-future-of-water
The United Nations has declared the world has entered an era of “Global Water Bankruptcy.” Their report argues that the old system of local rights is finished and that new enforceable limits, transparent accounting, and centralized management are required. See the official collection: https://unu.edu/inweh/collection/global-water-bankruptcy
The Mapping Machines Are Already Flying Over Your Head
Look at how they are already doing it.
Across the United States, helicopters now fly low over farms and aquifers towing giant electromagnetic loops that map the groundwater beneath our feet like an MRI of the earth. California’s Department of Water Resources runs statewide Airborne Electromagnetic Surveys for exactly this purpose. Click here to read how the water mapping technology works: https://water.ca.gov/programs/sgma/aem
These surveys create detailed maps of every major water source so that usage can later be tracked and limited.
The The All-Seeing Eye of Oracle Returns: Now It Watches Every Drop You Use
Oracle Utilities already processes data from more than 100 million meters worldwide with AI systems that detect irrigation, leaks, and individual household use in real time. Their customer platform is designed for exactly this level of precise control: https://www.oracle.com/utilities/customer-platform/
Larry Ellison didn’t just dream of a panopticon. He said the quiet part out loud: “Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.” That wasn’t a warning. That was a sales pitch from the man who still owns roughly 40% of Oracle, the company now quietly embedding itself into the pipes that deliver the most basic resource on Earth: water.
Once you own the real-time ledger of every drop that enters every home, every farm, every factory, you don’t need jackboots. You just need a dashboard. Throttle the water, and compliance follows. The same technocratic elite that spent decades consolidating data, finance, and surveillance is now moving on the last ungoverned commons, water itself, under the soothing branding of “customer platforms” and “smart utilities.”
And Ellison isn’t some lone eccentric billionaire operating in a vacuum. He’s a Trump donor who poured roughly $45 million into supporting the 2024 campaign and has since enjoyed the kind of access that turns political proximity into regulatory profit. The same circle that lectures about freedom while building the tools to score, monitor, and ration everyday life now has one of its most unapologetic surveillance advocates sitting in their inner circle.
The water meters are just the latest sensor in a system that already knows when you open the fridge, when and where you drive, when you yawn, drink, text or speak and soon, how long you shower and how many times you flush your toilet.
This is not innovation. This is the elite’s operating system for managed scarcity and behavioral compliance, dressed up as progress and sold by a man who openly celebrated the idea that constant recording would keep the public “on their best behavior.” Oracle isn’t managing utilities. It’s helping construct the choke points. What’s next Larry? Are you going to regulate and tokenize oxygen?
The infrastructure for control is already being paired with the financial machinery. Chainlink, a decentralized oracle network that feeds real-world data such as meter readings and conservation verification into blockchain systems, has published detailed guides on digitizing water rights and conservation credits into tokens so companies can buy offsets just like carbon credits: https://chain.link/article/tokenized-water-rights-credits
In Dubai, the DMCC (Dubai Multi Commodities Centre), a government-backed free zone and major international trading hub, has signed agreements to launch the world’s first digital token backed by verified freshwater reserves, positioning water itself as a tradable commodity on global markets: https://mediaoffice.ae/en/news/2025/june/17-06/dmcc-signs-strategic-mou
They Already Seized the Food and Are Playing God with the Weather
The elites have been systematically taking control of the world’s food supply for years. Bill Gates, through Cascade Investment, has become the largest private owner of U.S. farmland, holding hundreds of thousands of acres across nearly twenty states. At the same time, major asset managers like BlackRock hold massive stakes in the dominant agribusiness corporations that control seeds, fertilizers, processing, and distribution.
Simultaneously, cloud seeding programs and solar geoengineering research, backed by Silicon Valley money and governments, are rapidly expanding. These efforts claim to manage rainfall and cool the planet, yet they place the power to influence weather patterns in the hands of the very institutions already pushing centralized control over water and food.
In other words, they are running the classic Hegelian dialectic to consolidate power:
Create the droughts through weather geoengineering/modification
Declare an emergency and frighten the public.
Arrive with the “solution,” water tokenization that will supposedly save the planet but in reality just make them richer.
The pattern is unmistakable. Connect the dots. First, they buy the land that grows the food. Then they experiment with altering the weather that waters the crops. Now they are mapping, metering, and tokenizing the water itself so that every drop can be tracked, rationed, and sold.
This Is Not Theory. This Is the Takeover in Progress. Technocracy 101
They tell us water is too important to leave in local hands. They declare bankruptcy on systems that have sustained communities for generations. Then they create the digital and physical infrastructure to measure every use, enforce every limit, and profit from every token. The shared nature of water is being rewritten into a system of permission slips owned by the elite few who say that they, the experts, the financiers, the scientists, know best how to manage nature and humanity. It is all part and parcel of the plan of Technocracy Inc.
And make no mistake, this entire scheme sits squarely inside the United Nations Agenda 2030 and its Sustainable Development Goals. SDG 6 pretends to be about “clean water and sanitation for all,” yet the real machinery being built is the global accounting, metering, and financialization of every drop. The same institutions that wrote the goals now promote water “bankruptcy,” enforceable limits, transparent tracking, and market-based solutions that turn a basic necessity of life into a tradable asset class. What is sold to the public as sustainability and equity is in practice the transfer of control from communities and nations to the very financial and bureaucratic elites who drafted the blueprint. Agenda 2030 is the framework being used to justify seizing, measuring, and selling the world’s water under the banner of saving it.
This is the plan. It is already in motion. And the people pushing it expect the public to accept it as inevitable.
It is NOT inevitable.
Resistance is NOT futile.
Expose the plan. Shout if from the rooftops, news sites, podcasts and council meetings.
Don’t let the elites complete their takeover plan. They have the money but we have the numbers.
Tokenized Tyranny: How Elites Are Digitizing Our World for Total Control
I’ve followed investigative journalist Whitney Webb’s work for years, and her once-distant warnings now feel eerily prophetic as they unfold in real time. What she has consistently exposed, the systematic digitization and commodification of everything from natural ecosystems to human life itself, is no longer speculative theory. It’s happening before our eyes.
When I first encountered Whitney’s reporting, I found it hard to believe. Could this level of control and financialization truly be underway? It seemed too dystopian, too extreme. Yet after digging deeper the evidence was undeniable. What she described was not exaggeration. It was an accurate and meticulously documented reality.
The tokenization of nature and humanity represents a deliberate strategy by the world’s most powerful financial institutions. Figures like BlackRock’s Chairman and CEO Larry Fink have openly championed turning the planet’s resources, and increasingly aspects of human existence, into fractionalized, tradable digital assets on blockchain-based ledgers. This creates new avenues for elite profit and unprecedented surveillance and control.
With Fink now serving as Interim Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Board of Trustees (alongside André Hoffmann), the technocratic elite have gained an ideal global platform to accelerate this agenda. What better forum than the WEF to mainstream and fast-track “total control” from cradle to grave.
The process begins with assigning unique digital identifiers to virtually everything: land, water, forests, carbon credits, even personal behaviors and biological data. These are then logged on universal ledgers, where ownership is sliced into tradable fractions, much like stocks. But this goes far beyond traditional finance. It encompasses the Earth’s finite resources and, ultimately, the very essence of human life, all reduced to programmable, monetizable units in a centralized system of power.
This is tokenized tyranny in action: a quiet revolution that could redefine ownership, freedom, and existence itself..
Nature on the Chopping Block: From Forests to Fractional Shares
For nature, tokenization means chopping up wild places like the Amazon rainforest into digital securities. Each token represents a piece of land or ecosystem service such as clean air or biodiversity. Companies like O.N.E. Amazon, which is tied to U.S. intelligence and crypto investors, plan to issue these tokens backed by preservation deals. They cap the supply to make them scarce like digital gold. They install massive sensor networks and satellites to monitor every hectare in real time and collect data on everything from tree growth to animal movements. The data feeds into AI systems that manage the assets:
Each initiative will be structured under a transparent, science-based framework ensuring traceability, accountability, and full respect for Panama’s sovereignty. Future projects may also explore nature-backed digital instruments as mechanisms to channel private investment into measurable conservation outcomes.
Juan Carlos Navarro, Minister of Environment of Panama, stated: “As part of the partnership, O.N.E Amazon will pilot its proprietary Internet of Forests (IoF™️), an advanced monitoring system powered by satellites, LiDAR, and ground sensors, to provide real-time ecological intelligence that supports environmental governance and transparency.”
“O.N.E Amazon was created to align global capital with the conservation of our planet’s most valuable ecosystems. Together with Panama, we aim to demonstrate how innovation, transparency, and shared purpose can turn conservation into a true economic opportunity, one that benefits both nature and people. O.N.E Amazon is more than a financial instrument, it is a new contract between humanity, capital markets, and nature. When innovation meets purpose, markets become engines of regeneration,” said Rodrigo Veloso, Founder and CEO of O.N.E Amazon.
Whitney calls this tokenization of nature “borgifying” the environment (Remember Star Trek and the Borg). It turns planet earth into a controllable grid.
Involved parties include former BlackRock executives, Trump administration figures, and firms linked to stablecoins like Tether. They push this under the banner of sustainability while securing profits through inequitable deals with indigenous groups. Those groups get minimal shares and lose autonomy over their lands.
Greenwashing in Action: Tokenized Nature Happening Now
The WEF (World Economic Forum) is involved in turning nature into a commodity for investors to profit:
Finance Solutions for Nature: Pathways to returns and outcomes is out now! This insight report by World Economic Forum and McKinsey & Company provides a practical framework for investors to unlock capital for nature. Key takeaways: A portfolio approach is essential: 10 priority solutions can offer investors and issuers pathways to investable returns and nature outcomes at scale. Model transactions need to be replicated: Over 20 examples of existing transactions show that success in nature finance isn’t just theory — but needs replication. Markets can’t solve nature loss alone: Traditional finance has a central role, but needs enabling policies, robust data, better de-risking mechanisms, and shifting norms to recognize nature’s full value.
Another example is Estonia’s Single Earth, which tokenizes forests, swamps, and biodiversity to back its MERIT token. It allows companies to buy fractional ownership for carbon offsets while claiming to make nature the new gold:
“Single.Earth closes the $700 billion nature financing gap by channeling ESG (Environmental Social Governance)-driven company funds to high-impact landowners, while assessing ecological data for maximum impact globally.
Bridging Nature and Finance, Climate and Biodiversity, Corporate Sustainability through Nature Financing Enterprises buy tokens to balance their impact on nature and boost ESG scores, securing a greener financial future.”
In the Central African Republic, the Sango Project is tokenizing land, timber, and diamond reserves to attract investors. It turns national resources into blockchain assets. Even traditional commodities are involved, with platforms tokenizing oil and gas reserves or renewable energy sources:
“The Central African Republic (CAR) has extended its Sango blockchain project to tokenization of its land and natural resources. The country, one of the poorest and most crypto-friendly in the world, is also one of the most active in crypto innovation.”
Eco-Dystopia Ahead: When Nature Becomes a Profit Machine
In a future society under this system, nature becomes a Wall Street product where investors buy fractions of forests or rivers without ever setting foot there. Any “conservation” is dictated by profit motives rather than ecological needs. Entire regions could be locked into debt-like swaps where countries trade resource rights for loans. This leads to foreign-owned wind farms or bioenergy plants that displace locals.
Whitney explains that this creates a tokenized world where natural disasters or climate events can spike token values. It encourages exploitation disguised as green finance. Ecosystems are managed by algorithms that prioritize financial returns over life itself. In the guise of saving ecosystems, they are tokenizing the world and making profit from their exploitation of planet earth.
Humans as Assets: The Financialization of Flesh and Blood
When it comes to human resources, Whitney extends tokenization to the financialization of people themselves. Human potential, data, and behaviors are tokenized into investable assets. This builds on impact investing where elites bet on social outcomes like reducing poverty or improving education through human capital bonds. It turns individuals into data points on a ledger.
Personal information, health records, DNA, and even daily actions get digitized and fractionalized and linked to digital IDs and programmable currencies that track and control spending. It all connects to broader agendas from groups like the World Economic Forum. Humans are seen as resources to be optimized. Blockchain ensures every aspect of life from skills to biometrics becomes a tradeable commodity.
From Blockchain to Ball and Chain
Blockchain is often sold as a liberating technology. It’s sold as a super-secure, shared digital notebook where transactions get recorded in unbreakable blocks that form a chain. These spread across thousands of computers worldwide so no single boss can tamper with it. It promises privacy and freedom from banks or governments. But from my skeptical angle, like the one Whitney Webb takes, it’s actually shaping up to be a high-tech ball and chain designed to track and control every aspect of our lives. This happens despite those privacy boasts. While blockchain claims to be decentralized and anonymous, most versions, like Bitcoin’s, create a permanent, public ledger where every transaction is traceable forever. This makes it easy for powerful entities from governments to corporations to follow your money trail. They link it to your identity through exchanges or data leaks. They can build detailed profiles on your habits, associations, and whereabouts.
Elites are co-opting this tech. They push for things like central bank digital currencies built on blockchain that tie your finances to digital IDs with biometrics. This turns everyday spending into a surveilled activity. In the future non-compliant behavior like buying the “wrong” things or associating with certain people could get you flagged, frozen out, or punished. This could mean a world where your blockchain-tracked data feeds into AI systems that predict, manipulate, reward or punish your actions.
The ultimate goal is to enforce rules through programmable money. The programmable money can expire, restrict purchases, and track everything you purchase automatically. This is being pushed under the guise of security and efficiency. Critics on X say that because blockchains are so public and open, it’s easy for others to watch everything you do and even jump ahead of your trades to make quick money off you.
They argue that without true privacy, decentralization just hands control to the most resourced spies. This echoes Webb’s expose on how Bitcoin’s traceability makes it a tool for destroying real financial privacy in favor of elite-controlled systems.
The Blockchain Enabler: Fueling Human Tokenization at Scale
This blockchain backbone is exactly what’s needed to make the tokenization of human resources possible on a massive scale. Without it, you couldn’t reliably slice up and trade fractions of someone’s skills, behaviors, or biometric data. Blockchain provides the immutable ledger that records every tokenized “share” of human capital.
Whether it’s your work output, health metrics, or social compliance, it links them permanently to your digital ID so the elites can monitor, value, and manipulate them in real time. It turns abstract human potential into concrete, programmable assets that can be bought, sold, or penalized without escape.
Human Commodification Unfolding: From Bonds to Biometrics
It seems truly unbelievable and dystopian but real-world implementations are creeping in through programs like social impact bonds.
There investors fund initiatives such as prisoner rehabilitation or early childhood education.
“The Human Capital Project (HCP) is a global initiative launched by the World Bank to inspire and inform investments in human capital”
It paves the way for tokenized investments in workforce development. In refugee aid, organizations use blockchain combined with biometric IDs like iris scans or fingerprints to deliver and track assistance. This is how they implement the plan byte by byte as seen in UN pilots from the World Food Programme’s Building Blocks project in Jordan, where refugees scan their eyes to buy food with aid stored on a blockchain ledger. Or UNHCR’s efforts in Ukraine distributing programmable stablecoin cash directly to digital wallets. These systems make aid traceable and “efficient.” But I see them turning vulnerable people into monitored data commodities under the guise of inclusion and empowerment.
Your Skills as Tradeable Tokens
Companies are experimenting with turning workers’ skills and performance into digital tokens on blockchain platforms. They break down things like work history, credentials, or gig results into small tradable pieces. This mostly targets gig workers: drivers, delivery people, freelancers who do temporary jobs through apps. Platforms verify and tokenize these, letting people buy, sell, or trade tiny fractions of a worker’s “value” (fractionalized trading: like slicing someone’s skills into shares anyone can own and trade, similar to buying a piece of a stock). It turns personal labor into digital assets that can be bought and sold.
I know this sounds wild and hard to believe for most folks. I didn’t buy it either until I dug into the research myself. It’s all part of a larger agenda to digitize and control everything, your job and skills, your land, even nature under a single digital system run by a tiny elite of powerful companies and tech oligarchs. Critics call this endgame a form of fascist dictatorship known as technocracy, where “experts” and algorithms dictate life instead of democratic choice.
For a real-world example happening today, check out platforms like LaborX (part of Chrono.tech), a blockchain-based freelance marketplace where gig workers’ skills and work history are verified on-chain, and payments/rewards can involve tradable tokens tied to performance bringing tokenized labor closer to reality in the gig economy: https://laborx.com/
The Ultimate Warning: A Tokenized Hellscape Awaits
In my depiction of a tokenized future, society looks like a giant database where people own nothing tangible, as the WEF slogan suggests. The WEF idea of happiness is enforced through surveillance. Everyone carries a digital ID that opens access to jobs, services, or even basic rights. Tokens represent shares in human capital markets that reward or punish based on compliance.
Governments and corporations use this to engineer behaviors like tying aid to biometric scans or tokenizing refugee programs for “inclusion.” But it really cements a system of digital serfdom. I see this leading to a loss of freedom where the elite overlords hold all the tokens. They manipulate markets to siphon wealth while the masses are reduced to monitored data streams in a hyper-financialized digital prison.
Technocracy Tokenopoly
The world’s billionaire elite, already far beyond any need for more wealth, now crave absolute power and control. They are quietly fulfilling the 1930s vision of the Technocracy movement led by Howard Scott and Technocracy Incorporated which declared that scientists, engineers, and technical experts should replace democratic governments and elected leaders. They viewed traditional republics and ordinary citizens as too irrational and uninformed to govern effectively, insisting only a data-driven, expert-ruled system could rationally manage resources and society for maximum efficiency.
Today this technocratic ideal unfolds through the tokenization of everything: rainforests, rivers, biodiversity, human labor, skills, behaviors, and data all turned into tradable blockchain assets under the guise of sustainability and inclusion. Earth and humanity become pieces in a high-stakes game, satirized in Tokenopoly, where players buy and sell properties like the Amazon Rainforest, Nile River, Niagara Falls, CAR resources, Human Labor, and Biodiversity Credits, with cards commanding “Collect 100 Tokens” or “Go Directly to Digital Wallet.” Using AI, surveillance grids, programmable money, and immutable ledgers, the elite claim dominance and enforce compliance, building the tokenized, borgified system of digital serfdom
To pull off this nightmare, elites and tech oligarchs are racing to build AI data centers at breakneck speed devouring massive amounts of fresh water and energy just to hoard every scrap of our tokenized data. They can’t build them fast enough, but that desperation is our opening. People are waking up to their plan as their electric bills go sky high and their fresh water is drained by the data centers. People are starting to speak out.
Could their pride be their downfall?
How supremely arrogant of these self-anointed digital overlords to imagine they hold proprietary title over nature itself and over human beings, treating both as resources to be patented, monetized, and managed. How breathtakingly hubristic for them to insist that scientists, engineers, and technocratic elites are better suited to govern than the democratic process, elected representatives, and the will of the people.
Proverbs 16:18 – Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.
Expose their plan before it’s too late.
Don’t let them Borgify us and turn free humans into obedient, trackable nodes in their machine. Don’t let them steal nature and turn it into a commodity for the elite. Get active locally. Resist immediately. Slow their rollout to a crawl. The future isn’t theirs yet. We claim it by saying NO!
I’m a civil libertarian. We’re practically extinct now. There were never very many of us, but there used to be a lot more. Most people simply don’t support your right to say something they disagree with. And therein lies the rub, as the Bard once said. Political correctness, “hate speech,” call it what you want. It destroys liberty.
I have recounted many times the origin of the expression “you can’t yell fire in a crowded theater.” Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes used that phrase to explain why Woodrow Wilson had the right to throw WWI protesters into prison. They weren’t yelling fire, in a theater or otherwise. But the American public of that day and age accepted it. Didn’t offer up a whimper of dissent. In 1942, the Supreme Court, in a 9-0 decision, decided that "insulting or 'fighting words', those that by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace" are among the "well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any constitutional problem." Now, Americans in 1942 were in full WW2 war fever mode. They were too busy buying bonds and planting Victory Gardens to worry about any “Fighting Words” exception to the First Amendment. We had Nazis to defeat- screw free speech!
Think of all that could potentially be construed as “fighting words.” If someone says something bad about your wife, do you have the right to respond with physical violence? This was the Supreme Court kind of validating the Creed of the Hood, forty years before Hollywood started celebrating the “hood.” I don’t have to tell you what can happen if someone “disrespects” your mama. Ghetto culture especially benefits from this flawed decision, which put yet another asterisk on the Bill of Rights. I grew up well after 1942, but we were still taught that “sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.” And now, emboldened by a Supreme Court decision none of them are even aware of, our ghetto culture uses the “fighting words” exemption to enable angry Blacks to batter hapless Whites, and then attribute it to being assaulted by certain words. Fighting words. Well, if you hear fighting words, what else can you do but fight? Usually starting with a sucker punch.
I abandoned my liberal roots because the Left had already become unduly concerned with policing language, in the late 1970s. When the term “politically correct” was invented, and not met with incredulity, the die was cast. After all, if something is politically correct, that means that society has determined that there are opinions, words, that are politically incorrect. Not permissible in a country supposedly protected by a First Amendment. We should be free to be politically wrong, politically stupid, politically deranged. We should be able to say basically anything we want. Sure, saying something mean and confrontational to a person may result in you being punched. And if you’re injured seriously enough, you may sue that person for losing his cool and injuring you. But no one should ever be able to justify a physical attack based upon anything that someone else said. The Left today thinks otherwise. They declare that words are violence. They support punching “nazis” in the face.
This authoritarian mindset resulted in the creation of cancel culture. Which was all based on words. Words that are protected under the First Amendment. Innocent Whites- and make no mistake- cancel culture, political correctness, and “hate speech” are all tyrannical concepts directed exclusively towards Whites- lost their jobs over things they posted on social media. On their own free time. It doesn’t get much more unconstitutional than that. And this heavy handed policing of speech began to spill over into genuine insanity. Medical students got into trouble for stating the most obvious truth imaginable; that only biological women can give birth. You couldn’t challenge the changing of “pronouns.” You had to take seriously some indoctrinated student who declared that her new “pronouns” were “they/them.” A plural. Don’t even think about what might happen if you “misgendered” one of these mentally ill persons in a land lacking mental institutions. Instead, we have institutionalized “Wokeness.”
But the Right has shown over the past few years, that they have their own version of insane cancel culture. While the Left wants to censor any criticism of any nonwhite, or any non-heterosexual, the Right is trying desperately to make criticism of Israel illegal. Both the Left and the Right want to censor their political opponents. Nobody wants to defend to their dying day the right of someone to say things, even if they find them thoroughly objectionable. That is so eighteenth century. If they had a public referendum to vote yay or nay on the First Amendment, I honestly believe most Americans would vote nay. You can’t just say anything you want! What if it’s racist? What if it’s anti-Semitic? What if it’s sexist? What if it’s homophobic? What if it’s transphobic? Today, what someone says seems to be more important than what they do. We’re policing speech as much as we police conduct. No more speeches about sticks and stones. We’re all ghetto single mothers now; don’t let no one disrespect you!
If a man (and I’m pretty sure it has to be a White man) compliments a woman on some part of her anatomy, or perhaps even how pretty her outfit is, he may be in danger of getting in trouble. For speech. And most people- certainly most women- would agree that he should get in trouble for offending that woman. The word “offended” isn’t in the Constitution. You’re not supposed to have a “right” to not be offended. That seems self-explanatory, but the vast majority of people now believe that there is a protection against being “offended” somewhere in the Bill of Rights. Slander and defamation is one thing, and there have always been laws against them. But who determines what “offended” means? It’s a subjective, not objective term. It cannot be legally quantified, much like “hate,” another favorite term of censorship advocates. It’s based on emotion, not reason. So it’s perfect for today’s “Woke” Left, but also for today’s Zionist Right, which gets “offended” by “hate” directed at Israel.
If there is any group in America 2.0 which still has free speech, it’s our second largest, but most noticeable minority group. I’m glad someone has free speech, but many Blacks use it primarily to bash all White people, and immerse themselves in historical victimization over slavery. They possess a 24/7 persecution complex, and they feel compelled to share it with everyone. The problem with their free speech, however, is that it often results in infringing on the free speech of others. Saying the World’s Most Dangerous Word can result in criminal prosecution now. Ask Shiloh Hendrix. Some words have become sticks and stones in our society. If they offend Blacks. Or the non-Irish. Or transgenders. Or plain old White feminists. But no one else has these “being offended” rights. Least of all, average White males. Rich White males, like all rich people, have unending rights. But, if they get caught saying the wrong thing to the wrong people, they’ll be shuttled off to another high paying position.
It’s a short leap from monitoring and punishing speech to monitoring and punishing thoughts. Literal Thoughtcrime. While Black street criminals have the “right” to call out some hapless White for “looking” at them, some White females have taken to confronting certain hapless White males for “staring” at them. Perhaps staring at the “wrong part” of their body. Sexualizing them. Which is related to thought, if their thoughts are indeed impure. At any rate, that’s an incredibly slippery slope, but no one seems to feel that White men, like everyone else, have a right to look at other people. This includes hyper sensitive Blacks and attractive females. The rationale- which isn’t remotely rational- is that such “looks” can make Black people, or women, feel “uncomfortable.” This is another special right granted only to selected groups. The ones called “marginalized,” but in reality overtly favored. Gay Pride parades and drag brunches make many of us “uncomfortable,” but those feelings don’t matter.
All the “experts” are quick to inform you that some speech is not protected by the First Amendment. As the illustration above shows, this includes “Hate Speech,” which is a modern Orwellian concept that is indistinguishable from Thoughtcrime. The word “hate” can not be found in the Constitution. Hate is a human emotion. We all hate some things, and some people. We have a right to hate, as much as we have a right to love. One person’s “hate” is another’s reasonable disagreement. In fact, we have a right to be genuinely racist, to discriminate against each other. At least in our daily lives, in terms of who we want to associate with. Or to be genuinely anti-Semitic. Or genuinely misogynistic. Or to be repelled by the transgender agenda. We discriminate all the time. Will it become illegal to not like the taste of certain foods? How about collard greens? They are an essential part of “soul” food, after all. That’s probably a form of “hate” that’s not allowed in America 2.0. If someone Black complains, that is.
What if we publicly criticize the “talent” of a Snoop Dogg, or a Queen Latifah? Is that kind of discrimination, of choosing what music to listen to and what television shows to watch, “protected” under the Bill of Rights? What if we insist that the Anti-Defamation League is an unregistered foreign agent, as President Kennedy once did? Can we still say a fat woman is fat, or is “body shaming” not protected speech? Why can’t bald guys get upset if someone points out that they have no hair? Isn’t that “hair shaming?” As I pointed out recently on X, women can be “offended” by “body shaming,” but why can’t men be “offended” by “income shaming?” You know, pointing out that 80 percent of them don’t make enough to meet the ever increasing costs of living? Outrage has become politicized. Christians cannot be “offended” over things they consider blasphemous. But Jews can be “offended” over the mildest criticism of Israel, where they don’t live. Can we even say Tyler Robinson is innocent?
As for “obscenity,” it has never been legally defined, because it can’t be legally defined. If it’s merely nudity, then a lot of beautiful works of art that are centuries old would be banned. As the Supreme Court judge said, with typical ‘Murrican wisdom, “I know it when I see it.” I don’t think very many people talk about obscenity any more. Porn is mainstream. A rabbi owns one of the biggest sites- Pornhub. Another holy rabbi, Rabbi Shmuley, who is RFK, Jr’s handler, sells sex toys on the side. With his daughter. That’s how the “chosen” roll. “Ridicule” is perhaps the slipperiest of all these slippery slopes. Again, how do we define it? Clearly, an angry Black or a self- hating White declaring that “all White people should die” is not ridicule. Or “hate.” But saying that “transwomen” (men pretending to be women) shouldn’t play women’s sports is. A Sarah Silverman saying she hopes Jesus comes back so “we can fucking kill him again” is not ridicule or hate. But a gentile merely saying “Jew” can be.
Words can hurt. Good people try not to hurt other’s feelings. But in anger, we sometimes say things we shouldn’t. Why can’t there be an “anger” clause to protect the White non-non-Irish from using “fighting words?” Which can be used against them in a court of law. I hate the word “retard,” because of my very special late niece Denise. It’s become one of the most popular words in America 2.0, which tells you something about the state of the crumbling culture. But I don’t want people prosecuted for saying it. It offends me, but I’m not “marginalized” enough, and definitely not “chosen” enough, for it to matter. Suck it up buttercup. I hate all the gratuitous male nudity onscreen now. I guess you could say I’m “offended” by it. But I enjoyed the female onscreen nudity which used to prevail in America 1.0, so I don’t want to be a hypocrite. That’s what happens in a matriarchy. I “hate” the transgender agenda, but I will always try to treat those troubled souls fairly and decently.
Some free speech is freeer than others. Some “being offended” is more offended than others. Some “uncomfortable” feelings are more uncomfortable than others. We’ve gone full Orwell here. Now, I want to make clear that even the favored groups don’t have full civil liberties. Blacks, for instance, can lose their magical status if they offend the non-Irish. Ask my friend Cynthia McKinney. Jamaal Bowman was a typical entitled Black “representative” in Congress, and even got away with pulling a fire alarm inside recklessly. Black Privilege, I believe it’s called. But he couldn’t get away with being too critical of Israel, and AIPAC saw to it that he was defeated by a pro- Zionist candidate in his primary election. Feminists can get in trouble for “offending” Blacks or the non-Irish. So can the transgenders, I presume. But the non-Irish don’t seem to get in trouble for “offending” anyone. They’re kind of like the Beatles of the Bill of Rights. With some exceptions, they’re fully protected. Unlike the rest of us.
It’s lonely being a civil libertarian in the modern dystopian world. I want to protect the rights, and the speech, of all the Blacks who hate White people. Of all the Jews who hate the inferior Goyim. Of all the women who hate men to show interest in them. Of all the transgenders who are confused and lashing out irrationally. Of all the illegal immigrants whose presence has helped to lower wages and eliminate benefits to poor and working class Americans. Even for the rich elitists who conspire against all of us each and every day. I would want Hillary Clinton to get a fair trial. If any of us is denied our God-given rights, all of us are in jeopardy. One verbal miscalculation away from being “cancelled.” One misinterpreted look from being assaulted. We’re almost at the Minority Report level, so don’t fantasize about committing any crime. The flock cameras and the data centers are coming. Watch your step, and be careful what you say, and who you say it to. You’re being watched, and you aren’t protected.
The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.
“how to essentially hack any kind of power structure or bureaucratic structure and get what they want in a system of people.”
Bill Gates’ Daughter Took Secret Classes on Controlling Humanity
SlayNews.com | Frank Bergman
Globalist billionaire Bill Gates’s 23-year-old daughter Phoebe attended a secretive, off-the-books Stanford University course that taught a handpicked group of ultra-privileged elite students how to manipulate and control society.
The classes guided students on how to navigate power structures, exploit bureaucratic weaknesses, steer public opinion, and get what they want from institutions.
The invitation-only course, titled “So You Think You Can Rule the World?” was never publicly advertised.
It was unavailable to ordinary Stanford students without a referral.
Details of Gates’s participation have resurfaced as her startup, Phia, faces a major scandal over internal Slack messages showing that Gates and co-founder Sophia Kianni knew the company was using a controversial affiliate marketing practice known as “cookie stuffing.”
The revelations raise fresh questions about how Gates approached power, business, and ethics after attending a class explicitly designed around understanding and exploiting institutional systems.
Secret Class Taught Students to Exploit Power Structures
The Stanford course consisted of just 12 students who met once a week during the winter quarter.
Silicon Valley investor and Stanford graduate Justin Lewis-Weber taught the program, which participants simply referred to as “Rule.”
One former student said Lewis-Weber sought to assemble “like-minded folks who dared to dream bigger together.”
Another student described the course in far more revealing terms.
The goal, the student said, was learning “how to essentially hack any kind of power structure or bureaucratic structure and get what they want in a system of people.”
“It’s more about identifying the vulnerabilities or loopholes,” the student added.
“I think he’s less concerned with the ethics of it all and the problem-solving elements.”
Another participant described the class as focused on the “cynical parts of Silicon Valley.”
The student characterized Lewis-Weber as “power hungry, intellectual, but really focused on profit and power instead of doing good.”
The course was never part of Stanford’s publicly available curriculum and required students to gain admission through personal referrals.
Gates Used Secret Class to Recruit for Phia
The course was also connected directly to Phoebe Gates’s business ambitions.
According to the Stanford Daily, another student said Gates used the class to recruit workers for Phia.
Phia is a browser extension marketed as a “personal shopping assistant” that helps consumers find clothing deals and earns commissions when users purchase items through affiliate links.
But Bloomberg later found that the extension was claiming commissions on sales it had not actually generated, as Slay News reported earlier.
The company’s software automatically dropped affiliate tracking cookies and, in some cases, overrode legitimate referrals.
Internal Slack messages obtained by Bloomberg showed that Gates knew about the practice months before the company publicly blamed the problem on “technical anomalies.”
Gates told employees that “we should capture every transaction.”
Kianni likewise urged engineers to “keep these cookies dropping” even after concerns were raised about compliance.
Cookie Stuffing Accounted for Massive Share of Revenue
The controversial practice reportedly accounted for more than half of Phia’s claimed sales in June.
Bloomberg estimated that cookie stuffing represented approximately 51 percent of the company’s sales attribution during that month.
When Bloomberg first confronted Phia, the company said the issue had been fixed within 24 hours.
However, the newly surfaced Slack messages showed that Gates and Kianni were aware of the system well before the investigation.
Corporate attorney Ariel Givner has warned that cookie stuffing has previously been treated as federal wire fraud in U.S. courts.
Givner said the conduct can carry a “max penalty of up to 20 years’ prison” along with fines and restitution.
No criminal charges have been filed against Gates.
‘Rule the World’ Course Takes on New Significance
Gates has repeatedly tried to separate herself from the enormous wealth and influence of her billionaire father, insisting that Phia would succeed with “no ties to my privilege or my last name.”
Her attendance at a secret Stanford course teaching students how to exploit institutional weaknesses now casts that claim in a very different light.
The class was not built around ordinary entrepreneurship.
Participants described it as a program for learning how to identify loopholes, manipulate bureaucratic systems, and obtain desired outcomes from structures of power.
And Gates did not merely attend.
She used the class to recruit for the very company now under scrutiny over a business practice that allegedly exploited weaknesses in affiliate marketing systems.
For a startup founder who insists she built her success independently, the combination of elite access, a secret power-focused Stanford course, and internal messages about keeping controversial revenue-generating practices alive paints a striking picture.
John and Nisha Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute | Rutherford.org
The National Guard was just the beginning.
One year after President Trump deployed military troops to the nation’s capital, we find ourselves navigating a posse comitatus presidency in which the visual trappings of martial law are the norm, not the exception.
When Trump declared a supposed “crime emergency” in Washington, D.C., called in the National Guard, unleashed federal law enforcement throughout the city and temporarily seized control of the Metropolitan Police Department, we warned that the police state had found a new playbook: martial law, one city at a time.
What began in August 2025 as an extraordinary response to a supposedly “extraordinary” crime crisis has become part of the architecture of everyday government.
Thousands of military personnel have remained deployed in the capital. Armed Guard members patrol streets, Metro stations, parks and tourist attractions. They have supported arrest operations. They have responded to medical calls. They have shoveled snow. They have removed trash and weeds and participated in “beautification” projects.
This is how emergency power grabs become entrenched and permanent.
We do not have to speculate about where this leads.
We have already begun to see it.
When Trump federalized California National Guard troops and deployed Marines to Los Angeles during protests against immigration raids in 2025, a federal judge subsequently ruled that the administration had violated the Posse Comitatus Act by using military personnel to carry out civilian law-enforcement functions.
That description increasingly fits the Trump presidency.
Trump is not merely claiming authority as commander-in-chief over America’s military. He is increasingly behaving as though being commander-in-chief makes him commander-in-chief of the American people.
It is a profound, constitutional difference.
A president governs citizens. A commander commands troops. A police chief directs law enforcement. A king commands subjects.
The danger begins when one man starts behaving as though all four offices belong to him.
Trump has increasingly embraced his own digital version of that authoritarian theater.
It would be tempting to dismiss such images as narcissistic internet trolling.
That would be a mistake.
This is how Trump sees presidential power: as authoritarian power backed by military force.
The National Guard deployment in Washington is the physical embodiment of that worldview.
Armed soldiers are stationed around the monuments. They guard the perimeter of the Reflecting Pool. They patrol the National Mall. They appear at Metro stations, tourist sites and public parks.
Their presence is no longer presented as extraordinary. That is precisely the problem.
A free people should never become accustomed to soldiers policing their streets. Once that sight becomes ordinary, the constitutional barrier separating military power from civilian government has already begun to collapse.
And Washington is the ideal laboratory as a testing ground.
What can be normalized in the capital today can be demanded elsewhere tomorrow.
Indeed, we have already seen repeated attempts to expand the model beyond Washington: federalized National Guard troops in Los Angeles, attempted Guard deployments elsewhere, federal agents sent into cities, immigration enforcement increasingly carried out with military equipment and rhetoric, and presidential threats to “liberate” jurisdictions whose elected leaders resist federal policy.
Not every deployment has survived judicial scrutiny.
That is encouraging, but the real danger is larger than whether any particular deployment is eventually blocked by a court. The danger is that the country is being conditioned to accept the premise behind all of them: that whenever the president declares a city dangerous, disorderly, disobedient or insufficiently cooperative, military force is an appropriate instrument of domestic government.
That premise should frighten conservatives and liberals alike.
This is not fundamentally a question of whether you trust Donald Trump. It is whether you trust any president with a standing military force at his disposal for domestic political purposes.
The Constitution was not written on the assumption that good people would always hold power. It was written because power attracts abuse.
Every authority surrendered to Trump becomes an authority available to his successors. Every emergency power normalized now becomes part of the presidential toolbox later. Every constitutional boundary ignored because the “right” president is violating it becomes one less boundary available when the “wrong” president takes office.
This is how republics lose their safeguards: One deployment. One emergency. One executive order. One city. One exception at a time.
The Founders feared standing armies because they understood that military power and political liberty exist in constant tension.
The Posse Comitatus Act reflects that same hard-earned wisdom.
Soldiers defend the country. Police enforce the law. Presidents execute the laws within constitutional limits.
Citizens are not troops. Cities are not battlefields. Political opponents are not enemy combatants. And the president is not the American people’s commander-in-chief. He is commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
That distinction may be one of the few things standing between a constitutional republic and a police state presidency.
We had better remember it before the exception becomes the rule — and the troops never go home.
All government, of course, is against liberty.”~ H.L. Mencken
In all of nature, man is the only living thing that purposely seeks rule and abandons self-governance. I see this as entirely foreign, and completely unnatural. This desire to be ruled, to be coddled, to be told how to act, regulated, and restricted is unique to the human animal. Why is it that the only entity known that is supposedly intellectually superior and has the ability to reason, surrenders independence in favor of dominance by a master? Why is self-responsibility forsaken for a life bound by slavery? Why do people voluntarily vote to choose their commanding ruler, king, and court?
This is a legitimate inquiry, because government, all government, depends completely on force. Government cannot exist without resorting to violence, theft, and murder. Therefore, government is evil, and government is the essence of terrorism against all under its totalitarian thumb. This is why nullification of most all so-called ‘laws’ is absolutely vital, and not just in the courts by juror nullification, but broad-based nullification of all unjust ‘laws,’ which of course are all that exist outside those of natural law.
Government and its henchmen consider any resistance and any individual dissent a crime against the State, this the exact same as Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Mao, and of course now, Trump. This is backward of course, but reliance on propagating threats and fear is necessary by the State, so that a cowardly populace will obey their chosen masters. If a decent sized minority failed to comply with government at any level, that government would fail and fall apart in short order. There is just no way for the few to control hundreds of millions if they simply ignore and fail to acquiesce to this false authority, of which all government certainly qualifies.
This brings us to these current circumstances, all long-planned and now being implemented in order to quell the herd by division and fear. Withholding vital goods by stealth gives the appearance of actual shortages, but all these so-called ‘shortages’ are non-existent. There is no shortage of oil; in fact there are great surpluses, but they are being purposely withheld in order to drive great fear among this seemingly helpless proletariat herd. By intentionally making sure that the Strait of Hormuz and other passageways are blocked, this by the fake war in Iran, done intentionally, energy gluts become real. This of course is also devastating to farming, fertilizers, food production, markets, and causes extreme price inflation, all harmful to the masses only. Who controls the energy, food supply, and money controls the world, as has been posited for decades. Think of this situation as a coup, which is really nothing less than an intended false flag operation meant to bring about total control over all by resetting the monetary system in order to create a global multi-polar technocratic dictatorship.
The only reason all these things are happening is due to the fact that the people at large are not doing anything to stop it. In fact most are doing nothing, except relying on someone else to fix all the problems for them. I am constantly asked the insane question: “What is your solution, and what are you going to do to fix it. This seems to be the way of ‘modern’ man; indifferent, cowardly, dependent, irresponsible, groveling chattel.
This government is in the midst of wars around the world, all led of course by the U.S., Israel, and global technocrats, all working together to advance the same agendas of technocracy. We are constantly surveilled and monitored, monstrous data centers are going up everywhere, our data is captured and analyzed, our food, energy, and water stolen, our currency debased, and inflation is rampant, causing prices to explode. At the same time, AI is being shoved down out throats, biometrics are being mandated, digital ID is being implemented everywhere, ICE goons are targeting innocents nationwide, Flock cameras are going up by the thousands, and speaking out against this heinous government has become a crime, and in many cases has claimed many as targets of the State.
I cannot begin here to describe all of the evil being pursued by the ruling element of the technocratic dark state. Genocide, slaughter, torture, child molestation, depopulation efforts, democide, theft of assets, transhuman experimentation, and assisted ‘suicide,’ even of children. Land theft by government and its corporate partners, weather manipulation, atmospheric spraying of poisonous toxins and metals in the form of chemtrails, toxic ‘vaccines,’ fake pandemics, possible conscription, (slavery) and the list is endless. None of this could happen in a society based upon non-aggression, self-responsibility, self-defense, and true freedom.
As I stated in a few years ago:
The homily of obedience is beaten into the minds of the people by multiple deceptive means, and is an ongoing process that never sleeps. The effort to control societies is based on many methods of promoting service, (subservience) monetary or dependency enticement, nationalism, (worship of State) promotion of collectivism, and especially fear. The basis of this atrocious curse of obedience is psychological warfare against the people. Henry David Thoreau properly stated: “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.”
“Anyone who seeks relief from totalitarian rule by use of any political process or system, is completely lost in a sea of insanity and madness. The epitome of rule lies in obedience and voluntary compliance by those subjects of the State. Those subjects are any and all who believe in, allow, approve, condone, worship, or participate in, any State system or government that survives by a top-down ruling structure. Any rule of one monarch or any oligarchy over any other is absolutely immoral. No politician, no political party, no government, no president, no congress, no ‘democracy,’ no ‘republic,’ or any other insane power and control system, can exist if freedom is to be achieved. Only anarchy, self-rule; of, by, and for the individual, can co-exist with liberty.”
The only way to insure freedom is through the efforts of self-rule and self-governance. If government exists, freedom cannot. It is simply a matter of removing rule at every conceivable juncture, and disallowing any group of maniacal psychopaths to lord over entire populations, regardless of the outright idiocy of any claimed political ‘representation,’ which is just a farce based on propaganda, deception, and lies.
“Why can you not see the manipulation taking place? Why can you not see that you are being treated as a collective horde of tamable animals, instead of thinking individuals? Why can you not see the madness that is the basis of the world today? Why are you so blind to the planned total destruction of all that is natural and good, in favor of designed immoral chaos?“
“Order derived through submission and maintained by terror is not much of a safe guaranty; yet that is the only ‘order’ that governments have ever maintained.”~ Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays
“In the days when hyenas of hate suckle the babes of men, and jackals of hypocrisy pimp their mothers’ broken hearts, may children not look to demons of ignorance for hope.” ~ Aberjhani, The River of Winged Dreams
Yes, the House of ‘Representatives’ have signed and passed through the House the National Defense Authorization Act for 2026. (NDAA) This mislabeled behemoth (3,100 pages) called a ‘defense act,’ a $1.15 trillion dollar monstrosity, is the work of evil, warmongering, profiteering, murdering psychopaths; those politicians and their controlling banking and corporate masters, who hold total power over this governing force. This is an atrocity beyond the scope of the lowly masses, who seem to have given up any and every chance to abolish this state of rule called the U.S. government.
The passage of this act in the House of ‘Representatives,’ those who are supposedly tasked with ‘representing’ and protecting the liberty of the people, is testament to the fact that these worthless slime in Congress, and all other parts of this heinous organized crime syndicate called government, are there only to protect their own interests, and the interests of those funding oligarchical corporate, banking, and Israeli whores who own and control them. The sheer size of this abominable act is astronomical, and likely has not been completely read by any who signed and passed it, in order to hand it off to the repulsive and sickening Senate.
Any who believe that wars against other countries, and especially against the American domestic population will end, have seemingly lost their minds. Trump and his cohorts actually wanted $1.5 trillion dollars to prosecute offensive wars and enhance military expansion, and will likely spend that much or more over the coming year, regardless of any so-called limit of $1.15 trillion. There can always be another ‘emergency,’ the catch-all term for more money, slaughter, and technocratic control.
One of the most horrendous aspects of this insanity is the planned marriage with Zionist Israel and the U.S. I have said for many years that the Israeli and U.S. governments are one and the same, and that they have the same mindset of corruption and murder, acting as partners in demonic genocidal slaughter, and now with this pending NDAA passage, this fact will become obvious to any who can see and think for themselves. I do realize that the number of people able to discern this truth is vastly limited, but when something is this open and sinister, that number would normally increase.
I am posting the entirety of Section 219 of this horrific legislation, (formally Section 224) which is the section concerning turning over the U.S. to the evil State of Israel. I have highlighted a few key passages, but all of it is disturbing. I am including the full text of this section in the hopes that more will actually read it in full. There are few if any limits, and final language that allows for anything considered ‘classified,’ or that would “compromise security” be withheld from the people, and never released. What this open-ended language means is that you will never be told the truth about criminal joint operations.
Trump and Congress, as well as much (most) of the rest of the governing system, are completely owned by Israeli interests, and have succumbed to Netanyahu’s Zionist aspirations, none of which are in the least interest of Americans. This plotted coup is not being hidden because the powers that be think that you, most all of you, will never fight back, or do anything of value to stop this turnover of the country to a soulless genocidal Israel; the same Israel responsible for attacking the USS Liberty, bombing of U.S. interests, and complicity in the 911 [false flag, controlled demolition] attacks, among many other false flag atrocities.
“The trouble is that corruption isn’t something you can have a little of. It’s like cancer; inject it into a political organism and it’s bound to spread. It’s almost an axiom that power that has been taken out of the hands of the people is bound to grow progressively more corrupt.”~ Ross Macdonald, Blue City
The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth.
Look at the faces on your screen. The celebrities, the influencers, the athletes – they aren’t just “aging badly.” Their skin is thinning, their eyes are hollowing, and their bodies are breaking down in ways that can’t be explained by ordinary time. The mainstream answer is to call it stress, menopause, or “bad genetics.” But the real cause behind turbo aging is hidden from the public.
The root cause is the spike protein generated by the mRNA injections. That protein suppresses your body’s ability to repair routine genetic damage, and the result is visible collapse on the outside while the damage compounds on the inside. As I warned in my interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, the forecast was specific: sudden deaths within three to five years, slow kill-off factors extending up to ten years, and “turbo cancers primarily affecting leukemia, lymphoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer” [1].
Even the World Health Organization’s own cancer agency projects more than 35 million new cancer cases by 2050, yet it “conveniently ignores vaccine-induced turbo cancers among the young” [2]. That omission is not science. It’s suppression. It’s no coincidence this is happening now, in the years after the mass injection campaign. The timeline lines up. We are watching a generation be sacrificed on the altar of pharmaceutical profit, and we are being told to smile and call it aging.
How Spike Protein Silences Your DNA Repair Machinery
Every day, your DNA is struck by tens of thousands of lesions. UV light, environmental toxins, and even normal metabolism constantly break strands and damage bases. To survive, your body relies on overlapping repair systems: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), base excision repair (BER), and nucleotide excision repair (NER). These pathways fix thymine dimers, strand breaks, oxidative damage, and other genetic injuries before they become permanent. These repair systems are not optional. They are the difference between health and disintegration.
The presence of spike protein toxins suppresses these repair mechanisms by 85% - 90%, according to published scientific research. When spike protein interferes with those pathways, mutations get copied into every new cell. That accumulation is exactly what drives accelerated aging, immune collapse, and turbo cancer. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny has “identified and documented 40 different ways these vaccines” injure the human body [3]. These are not side effects; they are mechanisms of injury.
And we are injecting these substances directly into the bloodstream, “bypassing all body safety filters, including the skin” [4]. Think about the absurdity: polysorbate 80 is banned in ice cream because regulators don’t want you eating it, yet the same chemical is allowed in vaccines injected into children. When the CDC insists it’s safe, the CDC is lying to you. When those errors are copied into new cells, you don’t just age faster; you accumulate the mutations that become cancer. The predictable result of cells replicating with unrepaired genetic corruption is what we now call turbo aging.
This Was Engineered – and the Nuclear ‘Kill Switch’ Is Next
Make no mistake: this was all engineered, not stumbled upon. From Fauci’s gain-of-function bioweapon pipeline to the Pentagon’s experiments, the spike toxin was deliberately made more toxic and then laundered through the Wuhan lab before it ever went into your arm. The companies behind the mRNA products knew exactly what they were doing. “Moderna and Pfizer sought a court order to conceal clinical data for 75 years, which would have effectively erased our ability to trace any adverse effects back to the original vaccine administration” [5]. You don’t hide data for three generations if you have nothing to hide. The goal was never health; it was turning your body into a spike protein factory for a depopulation agenda.
I believe some of the same forces that handed you the spike protein are now pushing nuclear war. Radiation fallout causes double-strand breaks -- the most dangerous form of DNA damage -- and with repair systems already disabled, fallout becomes a global genetic kill switch. A nuclear exchange would be the ultimate kill switch for a population already carrying disabled repair pathways. This is not abstract fear. “Some Russian leaders are now considering a drastic measure: launching a demonstration nuclear strike to send a powerful message to the West” [6], while the architects of the COVID agenda escalate toward the exact confrontation that would create mass casualties.
If it happens, you will be told the fallout is safe. The ICRP model will be cited. But that model ignores internal alpha emitters like plutonium and uranium, which irradiate your tissues from within. I refuse to accept that lie. You are being set up to be lied to, and the only way to survive is to know exactly how your body repairs itself and what it needs to do that job.
There Is a Way Out: Restoring Your Genetic Blueprint
Here is the good news: your body has a blueprint for repair, and it can be reactivated with nutritional factors, some of which you can grow at home for free. You do not need Big Pharma to save you. This is not about expensive patented drugs; it’s about returning to the natural order.
To repair broken DNA, you need to give your cells the tools they were designed to use. I have spent my career teaching people to “incorporate healthy ingredients like avocados, bananas, turmeric, and even freeze-dried broccoli sprout powder into their diets for maximum potency” [7]. These foods carry the phytonutrients that support DNA integrity and cellular resilience.
This is why I’m producing a free course that lays all of this out -- including how to detoxify and rebuild, even after internal radiation exposure. The same protocols that restore DNA repair and resurrect senescent cells will also protect you from radiological fallout, because the biology is the same. Knowledge is the medicine that cannot be patented. I will announce this free course in the next few weeks at NaturalNews.com
Conclusion: Choose Knowledge Over Compliance
We are being told to accept turbo aging as normal and radiation as safe. But I refuse to repeat those lies. Humanity is worth defending, and the first defense is knowledge. Learn the mechanisms of DNA damage and DNA repair. Grow your own food. Support your mitochondria. And share this information with everyone you care about.
This is not about fear. It’s about freedom. Follow my channel, spread the word, and be ready when the free course launches. The more people who understand what is happening to their bodies, the harder it will be for the empire of lies to survive. Stand up. Prepare. And never stop asking the questions they don’t want you to ask. Choose knowledge over compliance -- and choose life over extermination.
References
Mike Adams. Mike Adams Interview with Sherri Tenpenny - February 28, 2024.
WHO Predicts 35+ Million Cancers by 2050 but Ignores Vaccine-Induced Turbo Cancers in Those Under 30 Years Old. NaturalNews.com. May 09, 2024.
Mike Adams. Mike Adams Interview with Sherri - June 17, 2025.
Injecting Chemicals Is More Dangerous Than Eating Them: Why Is Polysorbate 80 Banned in Ice Cream but Allowed in Vaccines? NaturalNews.com. June 17, 2025.
Mike Adams. Brighteon Broadcast News. Brighteon.com.
Mike Adams. Brighteon Broadcast News - Part Two: Oblivious Western Leaders. Brighteon.com. June 11, 2024.
Mike Adams. Mike Adams Interview with Jonathan Otto - November 18, 2024.
An eclipse of the Sun can easily be demonstrated on a map of a flat, stationary Earth. No spinning of a globe earth or orbiting of a moon far away in space is necessary. There is no need for a distant sun93,000,000 miles away or a distant moon 257,000 miles away, to explain how their relative sizes cause periodic eclipses. Real life, on the real Earth is much simpler than that.
Whilst reading this article, try to temporarily discard any belief that any mention of a flat Earth is just for crazy people. This response is expected in a world where everyone has been conditioned, since birth, to accept the spinning globe model without ever challenging it. Also consider that all real life observations are in fact those experienced from a flat, stationary Earth as opposed to a hypothetical rotating globe.
Before going into details of the coming eclipse, the first thing to consider is that the Sun and the Moon are in fact the same size. Furthermore, they both travel in regular circuits in the sky. Yes, just up there in the sky where you can see them with your own eyes.
The Sun completes a circuit around the flat Earth every twenty-four hours. That is why, like clockwork, you can predict exactly where the Sun will be at a given time. As it travels in a daily circuit, it gradually moves from over the Tropic of Capricorn (21st December – Winter Solstice), arriving at the Equator (21st March – Spring Equinox) then reaches the Tropic of Cancer (21st June – Summer Solstice).
It takes six months to complete this journey between the Tropics. The largest circuit is while travelling overhead in Australia (Tropic of Capricorn), resulting in summer there. The daily circuits then gradually reduce in size until arriving closer to Europe and North America, resulting in summertime while Australia experiences winter. The amazing feature of this journey is that, despite the changes in circumference travelled, the daily circuit is always precisely twenty-four hours. This is just one example of how you cannot truly understand the astonishing wonders of life unless you comprehend the real nature of the Earth on which you live.
Once arriving at the Tropic of Cancer, the Sun then starts the six month return journey back to the Tropic of Capricorn. As its’ circuits increase in size, it becomes visibly lower in the sky. Simultaneously, the weather becomes cooler in America and Europe because the heat of the localised Sun is further away.
What most people don’t know, because they have never been taught the fact, is that the Sun travels slightly faster around the twenty-four hour circuit than the Moon. In fact, from the moment the Sun and Moon are in the same position, it takes twenty-eight days for the Sun to lap and overtake the Moon once more. This process of the Sun travelling faster than the Moon is why we experience the different phases of the Moon.
The 28-day Lunar Cycle:
Overlaid on top of the Gleesons maps below is the relevant position of the Moon at each of the quarter stages of the 28-day Lunar Cycle. The Sun is shown where it is always at Midday (GMT), which is due south from the timezone in London.
In illustration (2), at Midday, seven days after the New Moon, the Sun is a quarter of a circuit in front of the Moon. This is why the right half of the Moon, the part facing the Sun, is illuminated. By observing this in reality, at the same time each day the Moon will appear to be trailing slightly behind the Sun. As each day passes this distance increases. The daily incremental distance is equivalent to a full circle divided by twenty-eight (the number of days in a complete Lunar Cycle).
In illustration (3), at Midday, fourteen days after the New Moon, the Sun will have advanced further around the circuit to be directly opposite the slower Moon. This is when we experience a full Moon.
A week later, shown in illustration (4), the Sun will be three quarters of a circle in front of the Moon. It will therefore appear that the Sun is coming up behind the Moon, hence why the left half of the Moon will be illuminated.
Finally, after twenty-eight days, the Sun finally catches up with the Moon. This is known as the New Moon. It is impossible to see the Moon when the Sun and Moon are alongside each other, except, that is, during a Solar Eclipse. This is when the Moon, with no illumination, appears as a dark object in front of the Sun.
The other important fact that most people do not know is that the Moon travels in circuits between the Tropics every month. This can be proven by regular observations, watching the Moon as it gets higher and lower in the sky during each month. If the Moon is observed gradually getting higher in the sky each day, it is coming closer, travelling towards to Tropic of Cancer. Alternatively, if the Moon is observed getting lower in the sky each day, it is moving further away, circuiting towards the Tropic of Capricorn. A solar eclipse occurs periodically at the precise moment that there is a New Moon, combined with the altitude of the Moon being the same as that of the Sun. This means the Moon must be on a size of circuit almost equal to that of the Sun.
The dates of these periodical occurrences can be predicted centuries in advance. Only by understanding how this plays-out over a flat, stationary Earth, can you truly stand in awe at the wonders of nature.
This amazing spectacle is not occurring millions of miles away in a dark, cold abyss. Rather, it is happening just up there in the day-lit sky, just above your head!
Solar Eclipse 12th August:
For the purpose of this illustration, the daily circuit of the Sun on the 12th August will be drawn where it is in reality, between the Tropic of Cancer and the Equator. The precise location of the Sun at the listed time of the eclipse is known. This is illustrated on the map according to where it is at British Summer Time. It is then very easy to predict where the Moon will be at the listed duration of the full eclipse. The eclipse only lasts for two minutes and twenty-one seconds in the location of the observer. This is the time it takes for the Sun to overtake the Moon from the viewer’s perspective on the gorund.
The way to determine if the Moon will be inside the circuit of the Sun or outside of it can be determined by where the full eclipse will be seen. In this case, the Moon must be inside of the Sun for the eclipse to be witnessed in Siberia, Greenland, Iceland, NE America, and Europe.
Any observer, located at a Longitude further south than the circuit of the Sun, will not see the Moon completely passing in front of the Sun. Why? Because the Moon is on the opposite side of the Sun.
The following text describes the predetermined location and precise time in which the eclipse will occur:
“A total eclipse of the Sun on August 12. The path of totality begins over the Taymyr Peninsula in north-central Siberia and crosses the Arctic Ocean to the north of Servernaya Zemiya, the north-eastern part of Greenland, the north-western coast of Iceland, the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean, northern Spain, and ends over the Balearic Islands.
The partial phase is visible from the Arctic Ocean region, western Europe, the North-Atlantic Ocean, the north-eastern United States, Canada, Alaska and most of the Aleutian Islands.
The eclipse begins at 15h 34m (BST) and ends at 19h 58m (BST); the total phase begins at 16h 58m (BST) and ends at 18h 34m (BST). The maximum duration of totality is 2m 21s”.
The times indicated on the Gleeson Map below are for British Summer Time which is one hour ahead of GMT. This is to indicate the position of the Sun at the times listed for the duration of the eclipse. Because a solar eclipse coincides with the New Moon, drawing a line between the locations experiencing the eclipse and the Sun will give the location of the Moon.
To conclude, please consider the information presented if you are fortunate enough to be in a location where you can experience the eclipse on the 12th August, 2026.
When it comes down to it, the natural world is both amazingly intricate but at the same time, very simple. The Sun periodically lapping and overtaking the same-sized Moon, while at the same altitude, just up there in the sky, is one of the simplest observations anyone can experience. Whether you disagree with this and need a complicated explanation involving distant planetary bodies hurtling across an endless abyss is up to you. The only thing to reflect on is whether the flat Earth reality seems quite logical compared to the spinning globe narrative.
Part I: Technocrats Called for Dictatorship and Technocracy In 1932
Patrick Wood | technocracy.news
In my tattered copy of Henry A. Porter’s Roosevelt and Technocracy (1932), an early reader drew a careful bracket around a single passage on page 72. It reads: “Radical and immediate changes in both our political and economic systems will be necessary.
This can best be accomplished by vesting supreme and emergency power in some one man who has the confidence and respect of a majority of the American people. That man is FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — to whom should be given dictatorial powers in the approaching crisis.”1
It is one thing to know, as a generalization, that respectable Americans flirted with dictatorship in the winter of 1932–33. It is quite another to hold a commercially published book in which the proposition is worked out in numbered steps by a financial analyst, and to see that a contemporary reader found the decisive sentence and marked it. Whether that reader bracketed the passage in alarm or in agreement, the pencil does not say. The ambiguity is fitting, because the country itself had not decided.
Porter is nearly invisible to history, and that is precisely what makes him valuable. His title page bills him as a “Nationally known Economist and Financial Analyst” and lists his other works — Profitless Prosperity, Gentlemen of America, Romance of Natural Gas, Research or Retrogression, America’s Greatest Tragedy — titles that place him not in any university but on the investment-commentary circuit of the day.2
His publisher, the Wetzel Publishing Company of Los Angeles, was a small regional house. I have located no academic appointment, no archive of papers, no obituary of substance. In the ordinary run of intellectual history this would disqualify him from attention. For my purposes it does the opposite. The views of Howard Scott were the views of a movement’s impresario; the views of Columbia’s prestigious engineers were the views of an elite faction. Porter is evidence of something else: how far the technocratic idea had seeped into the commercial milieu — the men who wrote market letters, advised investors, and considered themselves hard-headed realists. When a proposal to abolish constitutional government appears in that literature, dressed in the sober vocabulary of financial analysis, the proposal has ceased to be fringe.
The book’s internal architecture makes the point sharper, because Porter did not begin as a radical. Chapter XII, “What Will Roosevelt Do?”, opens on page 55 with sentiments any Hoover-era financial conservative would have signed: “Many people believe that the government is primarily responsible for prosperity, and likewise for depression, when the fact is that the relations of government to prosperity or depression are negative rather than positive.”
Commerce, he continues, “is carried on by the people without government assistance,” its relations “determined by themselves.”3
This is orthodox laissez-faire, stated as a recognized fact. Seventeen pages later, the same author is demanding a dictatorship. The distance between those two positions — traveled within a single short chapter by a self-described practical man — is, I would argue, the single most instructive thing about the book. The depression had not converted such men to collectivism by argument; it had convinced them that the machinery itself, price system and Congress alike, had failed, and that technocratic rationality was the only thing left standing.
Porter’s method of getting from the one position to the other was prophecy. In a chapter grimly titled “Postponing the Inevitable,” he set out a numbered forecast of the collapse he believed the interregnum winter would bring. Dissolution of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, he wrote, “may be expected to bring about the complete collapse of the stock market,” followed by, among other items: “7. Suspension of stock exchanges. 8. Government ownership of railroads and public utilities in an effort to maintain the solvency of our savings banks and insurance companies. 9. A ‘dole’ for the unemployed.” And then the sequence arrives at its destination: “a national awakening which, overnight, may well be expected to herald the news to every corner of the nation of the inauguration of the ‘new deal’ by 10. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — Dictator.”
Lest anyone mistake the dictatorship for the goal rather than the instrument, Porter closes the chapter: “Drastic as these changes from the present order of things may be, they will serve their purpose if only to pave the way for the Economic Revolution — and TECHNOCRACY.”4 Notice the small typographic fossil embedded there: “new deal” sits in lowercase, inside quotation marks. When Porter wrote, the phrase was still a fresh coinage from Roosevelt’s Chicago acceptance speech of July 1932, not yet the proper name of an era. The book belongs unmistakably to the narrow window between the election and the inauguration, when everything about the incoming administration was still projection.
The page-72 passage the old reader bracketed completes the argument.
“Assuredly Technocracy will come,” Porter writes. “It is plain that its coming will be delayed by political maneuvering and financial chicanery.”
The nation “shall have to pass through a period of Chaos”; its severity “is wholly within the control of the people”; and the way through is the vesting of “supreme and emergency power” in the one man commanding majority confidence.5
Two things are worth stating precisely here. First, Porter was not proposing a coup. His dictatorship seemed self-evident, and in his imagination, temporary — the old Roman logistics model, a magistrate for the emergency, legitimated by “the confidence and respect of a majority.” Second, and more remarkable, the dictatorship is not even the point. It is scaffolding. Congress is to be dismissed and supreme power concentrated so that the technicians can be installed “from top to bottom” and the price system dismantled. Among the era’s many calls for emergency power, this is what makes Porter’s distinctive: he fused the two most electric ideas of that winter — presidential dictatorship and Technocracy — into a single program, each justifying the other.
Dating matters enormously here, and it is a point my research has forced me to insist on: Porter wrote before Technocracy, Inc. existed! The membership organization, with its gray suits, its monad insignia, and Howard Scott’s increasingly wild-eyed pronouncements, was not founded until late 1933.
What Porter knew in 1932 was Technocracy in its first, unorganized incarnation: the public craze. Nobody can call Porter a disciple of Howard Scott.
Walter Rautenstrauch’s Committee on Technocracy at Columbia, formed in the summer of 1932, had lent Scott’s Energy Survey of North America the university’s prestige, and through the last weeks of 1932 the newspapers were saturated with ergs, energy certificates, and the imminent doom of the price system. “Technocracy” in those months was not an organization one joined; it was an idea in the air, unowned and undefined, and precisely because of that, a writer like Porter could pour his own content into the word.6
His Technocracy is not Scott’s in detail — it is a financial analyst’s take on a movement that did not yet have a catechism. The book thus preserves something the later literature obscures: what the technocratic idea looked like during its brief window of mainstream respectability, before it acquired uniforms and became a sect.
Nor was the dictatorship half of Porter’s program eccentric in its moment. The leaderless winter produced an entire literature of respectable authoritarianism. Walter Lippmann, the most influential columnist in the country, told Roosevelt to his face at Warm Springs that he might have “no alternative but to assume dictatorial powers,” and told his readers that the danger was not that Congress would give Roosevelt too much power but that it would give him too little. Eleanor Roosevelt herself remarked that if the crisis demanded it, a benevolent dictator might be the only way through.7
Barron’s, the prestigious weekly of the financial establishment (e.g., Porter’s own tribe), editorialized in February 1933 for “a genial and lighthearted dictator.”8 William Randolph Hearst, the publishing magnate of that day, put the fantasy on film: Gabriel Over the White House, rushed into theaters weeks after the inauguration, shows a president who dissolves Congress and governs as a benevolent strongman, and Hearst intended it as counsel, not satire.9 And when Roosevelt, in the inaugural itself, warned that if Congress failed him he would ask for “broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign enemy,” the line drew the loudest applause of the address — applause that, by her own account, frightened the new First Lady.10 Porter, in other words, was not shouting from the margin. He was saying loudly and systematically what the American center was murmuring.
What of the book’s own reception? After considerable searching, I found that it barely had one, no substantial review in the major press, no evidence of a second printing, no sign that anyone in the incoming administration acknowledged it — and Roosevelt, of course, did not respond to the offer of a crown from a Los Angeles market analyst. The book survives today in a scattering of library copies; the University of California’s copy has been digitized, which is how the text can now be checked against page numbers by anyone.11 Its bibliography entry in the movement’s historiography is a line item, not a discussion. But the obscurity of the artifact should not be mistaken for the marginality of its ideas.
The two halves of Porter’s program — Technocracy and emergency dictatorship — each received a spectacular public verdict within months of publication, and tracing those verdicts is the real reception history of this book.
The Technocracy half collapsed first, and theatrically. On January 13, 1933, Howard Scott, pressed by his Columbia sponsors to answer mounting press skepticism, delivered a nationally broadcast address at the Hotel Pierre in New York that was by every account a rambling disaster. Within days, reporters finished demolishing his credentials — the celebrated engineer had no engineering degree at all — and Columbia cut the Committee on Technocracy loose. By spring, “technocracy” was a vaudeville punchline.
The movement splintered: Harold Loeb’s Continental Committee on Technocracy took the respectable-study route, while Scott regrouped his loyalists and incorporated Technocracy, Inc. in late 1933 — an organizational salvage operation conducted in the wreckage of the craze.6 The consequence for Porter’s book was brutal: within ninety days of the inauguration it had become a fossil. Its title yoked Roosevelt to a word that had passed from front page to punchline in a single season, and no one in 1934 needed a tract urging the president to adopt a discredited fad. But fossils are what stratigraphy is made of. Precisely because Porter wrote before the collapse and before the incorporation, his book records the high-water mark — the moment when a financial analyst could believe, in print, that Technocracy was simply coming, “assuredly,” and that the only question was how much chaos would precede it.
The dictatorship half received its verdict in March 1933, and the verdict was subtler: Roosevelt took the emergency powers and declined the dictatorship. The sequence is worth setting against Porter’s numbered prophecy, because the analyst’s scorecard is better than one might expect. The banking system did collapse; the New York Stock Exchange did suspend trading, closing with the banks in the first week of March — Porter’s item 7, briefly literal. The federal government did assume responsibility for relief within weeks (item 9, in the form of federal emergency relief), and it did go into the utility business on a scale unimaginable in 1932 (item 8, partially, in the Tennessee Valley). The Emergency Banking Act was passed, famously, in hours, by congressmen who in some cases never saw the text they approved — government by acclamation if ever the republic practiced it.12 What never arrived was item 10.
The extraordinary powers of the Hundred Days flowed through Congress, not around it; they were statutory, revocable, and litigated, and when the Supreme Court struck down the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1935, the revocability was demonstrated in the most public way possible.13 Roosevelt governed the emergency with the forms of the Constitution intact — which is, historically, the precise thing that separates what happened in Washington in 1933 from what happened in Berlin the same spring. Porter had predicted the crisis accurately and the constitutional outcome wrongly, and the wrongness is the most reassuring fact in this whole story.
And yet, on a third count — the one nobody was polling — Porter half-won. He had wanted Technocrats appointed “from top to bottom,” and while no Technocrat with a capital T ever ran the government, the type arrived in force. Rexford Tugwell, the most Veblen-marinated of Roosevelt’s Brain Trust, spent the decade being denounced in the press as precisely the technocrat-planner Porter had prayed for. Arthur Morgan’s early Tennessee Valley Authority was as near to a working technate as this country has built — engineers, dams, regional planning, and utopian community-building under one federal charter. The National Recovery Administration’s code apparatus, the Resources Planning Board, the rural electrification engineers: the New Deal absorbed the technocratic impulse so thoroughly that the organized movement suffocated for lack of a grievance.14
This, I think, is the correct frame for Porter’s book in the longer arc I have been tracing from 1932 to 1938: the Technocracy movement failed as a constitutional proposition in the same season it succeeded as a personnel policy. The country refused the dictatorship of the engineers and then, quietly, hired the engineers.
That is why this obscure book repays the attention I have given it. It compresses into ninety-odd pages the entire mechanism by which the technocratic temptation works on practical men: begin with efficiency, proceed through despair of politics, arrive at rule by experts, and treat the constitutional question as a detail of implementation.
Porter traveled that road in seventeen pages, in public, under his own name, with a straight face. His was the sober, business-district version of an idea that was simultaneously being preached in gray flannel by Howard Scott. The road did not close in 1933. It reopens, in politer dress, in every era that loses confidence in its deliberative institutions and finds its engineers still standing; readers may supply their own examples from the present century. Somewhere in 1933 a reader worked through this book, reached page 72, and set a pencil bracket around the sentence offering Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictatorship. The bracket is still there. The question it marks — whether a frightened democracy can borrow the competence of its technicians without surrendering the government to them — is still open, and it is the question my research on these years keeps returning to.
[Part II: Technocrats Call For Dictatorship And Technocracy In 2026 Below Endnotes]
Endnotes
Henry A. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy (Los Angeles: Wetzel Publishing Co., 1932), 72. Capitalization as in the original.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, title page.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 55.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 62–63. The chapter is titled “Postponing the Inevitable”; items 1–6 of the forecast precede the page reproduced here.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 72.
William E. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), which remains the standard account of the Columbia Committee on Technocracy (organized under Walter Rautenstrauch, summer 1932), the press craze of December 1932–January 1933, Howard Scott’s Hotel Pierre address of January 13, 1933, the exposure of his credentials, and the movement’s subsequent splintering into Harold Loeb’s Continental Committee on Technocracy and Scott’s Technocracy, Inc., incorporated in late 1933.
Jonathan Alter, The Defining Moment: FDR’s Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006), on Lippmann’s Warm Springs counsel (“you may have no alternative but to assume dictatorial powers”), his February 1933 columns to the same effect, and Eleanor Roosevelt’s private remarks on the possible necessity of a benevolent dictator.
“A genial and lighthearted dictator”: editorial, Barron’s, February 13, 1933.
Gabriel Over the White House, dir. Gregory La Cava (Cosmopolitan Productions/MGM, 1933); produced with William Randolph Hearst’s financing and script interventions, from the novel Rinehard by Thomas F. Tweed.
Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933. On the applause and Eleanor Roosevelt’s reaction, see Alter, The Defining Moment.
The University of California copy is digitized at HathiTrust (catalog record 006517511), permitting page-level verification: babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b273822.
David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), on the March 1933 bank holiday, the concurrent suspension of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, and the passage of the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933.
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream, on the New Deal’s absorption of the technocratic impulse and the movement’s consequent decline; Kennedy, Freedom from Fear, on Tugwell, the Brain Trust, and the planning agencies. On the early TVA as applied technocracy, see also Arthur Morgan’s own writings and the TVA’s founding statute of May 1933.
Part II: Technocrats Call For Dictatorship And Technocracy In 2026
Patrick Wood | technocracy.news
On my desk are two texts separated by seventy-five years and joined by a single idea. The first is a physical object: Henry A. Porter’s Roosevelt and Technocracy, published by a small Los Angeles house in 1932, in which a self-described “Nationally known Economist and Financial Analyst” urged the incoming president to accept “dictatorial powers in the approaching crisis,” dismiss the machinery of representative government, and install Technocrats from top to bottom.1
The second exists only as archived pixels: Unqualified Reservations, the blog Curtis Yarvin began writing in 2007 under the name Mencius Moldbug, in which a San Francisco software engineer urged Americans to accept that democracy had failed, that the government should be run by a chief executive with the powers of a monarch, and that the officer class of the new regime should be drawn from the people who know how to build things.2
Who cares about Curtis Yarvin? Well, arch-Technocrat Peter Thiel reveres Yarvin as his “house philosopher.” J.D. Vance, as a protégé of Thiel, has repeatedly quoted Yarvin’s ideas over an extended period. Specific Yarvin policies, like RAGE, have been explicitly enacted during the Trump Administration. Yarvin matters!
I have spent years with the first text, and the more time I spend with the second, the more convinced I become that they are the same essay written twice — once in the vocabulary of the engineer, once in the vocabulary of the startup founder.
Some precision about names is required first, because the genealogy is loose in the popular telling. Yarvin did not coin the phrase “Dark Enlightenment”; the British philosopher Nick Land did, in a 2012 essay of that title that described, systematized, and extended what Yarvin had been writing for five years.3 Yarvin’s own name for his school of thought was “neoreaction.” Nor is there any documented organizational pipeline running from Howard Scott’s Technocracy Inc. to Yarvin’s movement; no membership rolls handed down, no succession of institutions. The connection is of the kind I have traced elsewhere between the Technocracy movement and the Cold War defense intellectuals: a continuity of ideas, incubated in the same elite class and reactivated by the same conditions.
The Dark Enlightenment stands to the 1930s Technocracy movement roughly as the Cold War technostructure did — a descendant that would indignantly deny the ancestry, and whose family resemblance is for that reason all the more instructive. It is the recurring conviction that the deliberative institutions are obsolete machinery, and that the people who demonstrably make complex systems work have a superior claim to run the state.
What makes the comparison exact rather than merely suggestive is that both programs converge on the same man. Porter made his offer prospectively: writing in the middle of the winter of 1932–33, he prophesied collapse in numbered steps, culminating in “FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT — Dictator,” and argued that supreme and emergency power vested in “some one man who has the confidence and respect of a majority” was the necessary passage to Technocracy.4
Yarvin makes the same argument retrospectively. Across his writing, and as recently as his January 2025 interview with the New York Times, he has held up Roosevelt as his central American precedent: the president who, in Yarvin’s telling, governed as an elected monarch; commanding a compliant Congress, ruling through new agencies staffed by his own people, adored rather than resisted.5 Yarvin does not offer this history as a warning. He offers it as proof of concept.
The presidency, he argues, contains a throne. Roosevelt sat in it. The republic loved him for it. Therefore, the next occupant may sit in it too, this time with a better org chart.
Porter is the prophecy, Yarvin is the application.
Set side by side, the two programs share a complete logical skeleton. Both begin by declaring the existing system not merely failing but already fake. For Porter and the Technocrats, the price system and the Congress that served it were obsolete machinery, kept running past their natural death by “political maneuvering and financial chicanery.”6
For Yarvin, electoral democracy is a facade behind which an unelected consortium of universities, media, and permanent bureaucracy actually governs. He calls this “the Cathedral.” 7 Both then conclude that the remedy is formal, concentrated, personal power: better an open executive than a hidden oligarchy. Both are explicit that the strongman is not the destination but the instrument — scaffolding for the installation of a new administrative class of Technocrats.
Porter wanted his dictator to appoint Technocrats from top to bottom; Yarvin wants his chief executive to retire the entire civil service — his old acronym was RAGE, “Retire All Government Employees” — and restaff the state with founders and engineers.8 And both close with the same soothing clause: Porter’s dictator holds “the confidence and respect of a majority of the American people,” while Yarvin’s monarch answers to a board and can be removed like any failing CEO. In each case the reassurance is hollow, and in each case it is the weakest joint in the structure, for reasons the actual history of the 1930s supplies.
Even the legitimating figure is the same figure, updated for a new economy. In 1932 the engineer stood at the peak of his cultural authority: he had electrified the continent, raised the dams and the skyscrapers, and could plausibly claim to be the one man in American life who demonstrably made things work while the politicians talked.
The Technocracy craze and Porter’s book converted that authority into a political claim. In the 2010s and 2020s the startup founder occupies precisely that position: the builder of platforms and rockets, the one figure who visibly ships while institutions deliberate. Yarvin’s innovation was to convert that authority into a political claim, and his prescription — run the government “like a startup,” with a founder-CEO wielding undivided authority — is Porter’s prescription with the slide rule swapped for the term sheet.
Ninety years apart, the same professional class petitions for the same commission on the same grounds: that competence should replace consent.
The differences are as instructive as the parallels. Scott’s Technocracy was, in its economics, radically anti-capitalist. It proposed to abolish the price system outright and to replace money with energy accounting, which is one reason respectable America could flirt with it only briefly.9
Yarvin inverts the economics completely. His “gov-corp” is capitalism absolutized — the state reimagined as a joint-stock corporation, sovereignty as equity, citizens as customers. Private property should be turned over to the gov-corp to manage.
Technocracy dreamed of rule by a faceless technical committee; Yarvin, whose intellectual debts run to Carlyle rather than Veblen, insists on a person, a sovereign, a name. The temperaments differ accordingly: Technocracy was scientistic and positivist, all charts, surveys, and thermodynamics, while the Dark Enlightenment is literary.
The movements’ social forms differ too — Technocracy was a genuine mass movement, with lecture halls, membership sections, and gray uniforms, where neoreaction was born on a blog and traveled through elite patronage, most prominently Peter Thiel’s.10 And the surrounding weather differs most of all. Porter wrote amid twenty-five percent unemployment and a banking system in genuine collapse; the emergency was not rhetorical. Yarvin writes amid prosperity and polarization, and must therefore manufacture the sense of terminal crisis that 1932 supplied free of charge.
Yet the reception histories rhyme in the way I have come to expect from this material. Porter’s book sank without a review worth finding; within months its title had yoked Roosevelt to a word that had passed from front page to vaudeville punchline, and the book became a fossil.
But the technocratic type was absorbed into the New Deal almost immediately — Tugwell in the Brain Trust, Arthur Morgan on the Tennessee Authority, the planners in a dozen new agencies — so that the idea lost as a constitutional proposition in the very season it won as a personnel policy.
Yarvin’s trajectory inverts the tempo but repeats the shape. His blog was a fringe curiosity for fifteen years, and then the absorption began: a sitting vice president has cited him by name,11 his RAGE proposal was widely recognized as a template for the mass federal workforce removals of 2025,12 and mainstream interviewers now travel to ask him whether democracy is finished.
There remains the historical question on which the whole comparison turns, and here I part company with both of my subjects. Yarvin’s proof-of-concept, like Porter’s prophecy, requires that March 1933 be read as the moment America accepted a monarch. It was not, and the distinction is not trivial — it is the entire point. Offered exactly the crown Porter described, in exactly the crisis he prescribed, Roosevelt took extraordinary powers through Congress rather than over it: statutory, revocable, and litigated.
The stock exchanges closed and reopened; the banking act passed in hours;13 and two years later the Supreme Court struck down the centerpiece of the recovery program in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, and the president — adored, unprecedented, at the height of his mandate — complied.14 The forms held.
I keep returning to the pencil bracket in my copy — the mark some reader of 1933 set around the sentence offering Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictatorship. I once assumed the bracket belonged to a closed chapter, a curiosity from the era my research covers. I no longer believe that. The technocratic temptation is not a chapter but a recurring season: it arrives whenever a confident technical class meets a discouraged democracy, in 1932 wearing the engineer’s gray flannel, in 2012 posting under a pseudonym, and in our own decade briefing statesmen.
Porter and Yarvin, the obscure analyst and the celebrated blogger, mark two visitations of the same scenario, and the question the bracket asks has not changed in ninety years: whether a frightened or merely frustrated republic can borrow the competence of its builders without handing them the government.
Twice now, America’s answer has been to take the builders and refuse the crown. The Dark Enlightenment is, at the bottom line, a wager that the third time will be different.
Porter was an obscure figure rising out of the financial industry in 1932. Yarvin is a pedestrian philosopher who rose from Silicon Valley in the 2010s. It’s the same playbook to create a coup to implement Technocracy. Reject it all.
References
Henry A. Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy (Los Angeles: Wetzel Publishing Co., 1932), 72 and title page. Capitalization as in the original.
Curtis Yarvin, writing as Mencius Moldbug, Unqualified Reservations (blog, 2007–2014), archived at unqualified-reservations.org.
Nick Land, “The Dark Enlightenment” (essay serialized online, 2012).
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 62–63 (“Postponing the Inevitable”).
David Marchese, “Curtis Yarvin Says Democracy Is Done. Powerful Conservatives Are Listening.” New York Times, The Interview, January 18, 2025 — also the source for the run-the-government-”like a startup” and FDR-as-monarch discussions.
Porter, Roosevelt and Technocracy, 72.
Mencius Moldbug, “A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations” (2009), where “the Cathedral” receives its fullest exposition.
The RAGE proposal (“Retire All Government Employees”) dates to Yarvin’s 2012 lecture “How to Reboot the US Government”; he revisits it in the Marchese interview, note 5.
William E. Akin, Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977), on the abolition of the price system, energy accounting, and the movement’s organizational forms.
James Pogue, “Inside the New Right, Where Peter Thiel Is Placing His Biggest Bets,” Vanity Fair, April 2022.
JD Vance’s on-the-record citations of Yarvin, beginning with 2021 podcast remarks on mass replacement of the civil service, are documented in, e.g., Ian Ward, “The Seven Thinkers and Groups That Have Shaped JD Vance’s Unusual Worldview,” Politico Magazine, July 2024.
For contemporaneous reporting connecting Yarvin’s program to the incoming administration and the 2025 federal workforce reductions, see Jason Wilson, “He’s Anti-Democracy and Pro-Trump: The Obscure ’Dark Enlightenment’ Blogger Influencing the Next US Administration,” The Guardian, December 21, 2024, and subsequent 2025 coverage.
David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), on the bank holiday, the Emergency Banking Act, and the Hundred Days.
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
See, e.g., the syndicated commentary “The Dubious History of America’s Most Famous Monarchist,” Salt Lake Tribune, January 25, 2025, among the historians’ responses to Yarvin’s readings of FDR and Lincoln.
Dr Anthony Fauci is testifying in front of congress today. Waiting for him, teeth bared, is his nemesis Rand Paul, armed with incriminating e-mails and (allegedly) extracts from Fauci’s personal diary, written between 2019 and 2022.
Familiar names and phrases, like the Wuhan Institute of Virology and “gain of function” are doing the rounds once more.
“It was natural”, say some. “It was a lab accident”, say others. “They released it on purpose,” chorus a third group.
My position – and the OffG position – has been clear for years: [as has Truth11.com]
There was no Covid virus.
It didn’t jump from a bat, or leak from a lab and it wasn’t a bio-weapon, because it never existed.
This is the only logical interpretation of the evidence.
The evidence of fore-knowledge and planning obviously rules out an accident or natural occurrence.
Unless you want to argue that the greatest psy-op of all time – involving actors in every section of civil society at every level of authority in almost every country on Earth – started by accident.
And the refutation of the bio-weapon thesis is a simple question: What’s the point of a bio-weapon that doesn’t do anything?
“Covid” had near-identical death rates to seasonal flu, the majority of “Covid cases” never even had symptoms.
Is this what they spent billions researching?
Is it not more likely the disease was a creation of testing protocols and propaganda?
After all, an entirely fake disease offers total control of your pandemic narrative. It kills who you like, when you like, and stops when you tell it to stop. Your vaccine will definitely work, because it doesn’t have to do anything.
For a full making of this case, read our history of covering the lab leak theory here, here and here. Or Mike Yeadon’s great piecehere.
And as for Fauci, he has been on political death row for a long time. He was christened Covid’s disposable scapegoat almost as soon as the media started treating him like the pandemic’s superhero.
Such is the price of fame.
It’s long been apparent that, should someone need to take the fall for the pandemic, and sate some public thirst for vengeance, it would be the good doctor.
This questioning is part of that process.
It’s a show trial with Fauci doggedly pleading the fifth like a good boy. A WWE event with a scripted loser who has to go up on stage and take a fake beating.
The diary might be real, or it might be the result of a ChatGPT prompt from two days ago, and does it matter much which?
It’s all a grand distraction that, under the guise of accountability, is reinforcing the underpinning lies of the Covid Pandemic.
That’s been the point of the lab-leak theory from the beginning.
Watching the predictable fall of Spain is like watching a horrific train wreck that you can’t turn away from, and it’s all thanks to the socialist government there. Terrifying images of thousands of Muslim migrants overrunning the coastal city of Ceuta hit social media on Thursday, and this isn’t the first time the borders of Spain have been breached.
Allahu Akbar Spain!
Muslim "enrichers" chanted pro-Hamas slogans and waved photos of Saddam Hussein in front of the Puerta del Sol.
Much of Spain was ruled by Muslim conquerors from 711 to 1492; Muslims believe that the territories they lost during the Spanish Reconquista still…pic.twitter.com/mi1uqQ6Bx4
Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has actively welcomed the invasion and is refusing to deploy the military. The people there are on the verge of a revolt. The country is swarming with young Muslim men conquering its streets with almost no resistance.
This takes me back to Del Rio, TX in 2021 w/ the Haitian surge. Similar images.
This is what the DSA/socialist platform looks like in practice – in another country. No borders. No immigration enforcement. Complete freedom of movement without any resistance from the government.https://t.co/zTAMql2YGl
Fox News reporter Bill Melugin commented on the horde of Muslim militants storming Ceuta.
“This takes me back to Del Rio, TX in 2021 w/ the Haitian surge. Similar images,” he remarked, although the images seen today look far worse.
“This is what the DSA/socialist platform looks like in practice – in another country,” he correctly noted. “No borders. No immigration enforcement. Complete freedom of movement without any resistance from the government.”
“The videos coming out of Ceuta, Spain are insane,” Melugin stated. “Thousands of Moroccans and Algerians breaching and overrunning the Spanish border.”
“AP reports the city has asked Madrid to declare a national emergency. Search ‘Spain Ceuta’ on X if you haven’t seen the images yet,” he added.
According to the Associated Press, thousands of migrants poured into Ceuta from Morocco on Thursday. The helpful Spanish government even opened the gates for them. Local officials begged the prime minister to declare a national emergency and send the army to restore the border. Their pleas fell on deaf ears.
A Guardia Civil spokesperson reported that the migrants were “massively entering from the sea” through the Tarajal breakwater but could not provide any estimates for the numbers.
From the AP:
Spain’s interior ministry said it would guarantee the safety of citizens and the integrity of the nation’s border, but that the government could not declare a national emergency over migration concerns.
Video footage showed crowds of people, mainly Moroccans, walking around the breakwaters at Tarajal beach onto local roads. While the majority appeared to be young men, there were also families with women and children. “Viva España!” some shouted to a freelance photographer working for The Associated Press.
The AP report notes this isn’t the first time that the city has been flooded with migrants. The scenes of people streaming across the frontier recall the border crisis of May 2021 when more than 8,000 migrants poured into Ceuta in just two days.
Naturally, the AP is underreporting the numbers there. They always do. And notice that no major media source is calling the invaders what they are… Muslims.
Calls for the Military Fall on Deaf Socialist Ears
Juan Jesús Vivas, the head of Ceuta’s regional government, called for the country’s government to declare a national emergency on grounds of national security. He literally pleaded for more police and for the army to be deployed to the border. He was ignored.
BREAKING: An estimated 2,000 to 3,000 migrants cross into Spain’s Ceuta from Morocco, overwhelming police & prompting calls to deploy the army.
Vivas asserted that the additional police and soldiers are necessary “to guarantee the inviolability of the frontier and citizen safety.”
No kidding. Hide the women and children.
BREAKING:
The government of Ceuta has released a video asking Spain to declare a state of emergency, deploy the army to the enclave, and fully close the borders.
Sánchez deliberately ignored their requests and warnings about the coming invasion, leaving them no choice but to…pic.twitter.com/7TuzQveY0z
Conservative opposition People’s Party leader Alberto Nuñez Feijoo posted on X, “The situation in Ceuta is desperate. The government cannot look the other way… because we are facing a national security crisis.”
Unfortunately, the socialists not only don’t care… they welcome their new overlords.
Spain's socialist Prime Minister announced he would be giving amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.
Now, his country is being invaded by hordes of military aged men from Africa.
Because that's what happens every single time a politician offers amnesty.
“The situation is absolute chaos,” said Rachid Sbihi, who is the head of the association that represents Guardia Civil officers in Ceuta, according to The Guardian. “It’s not possible to give precise numbers, but there are thousands of migrants crossing.” He added that the border had “totally collapsed.”
The Guardian is also reporting that Santiago Abascal, who leads the far-right Vox party, described the incident as an “invasion” and declared that those crossing into Ceuta were not fleeing war or poverty but had been summoned by Sánchez’s government to ensure he could remain in power. That is likely spot on.
¡SOS Ceuta!
No vienen huyendo de ninguna guerra, ni de la pobreza. Es una invasión. Son hombres en edad militar llamados por el Gobierno corrupto de Sánchez para que asalten nuestras fronteras para que después deambulen por las calles de España diciendo "Viva Pedro Sánchez".…pic.twitter.com/Vuk2PeSIsb
Asalto masivo en Ceuta. Anunciado. Un solo responsable: Sánchez. Cómplices: muchos, un listado interminable. Victimas: los ceutíes y por extensión todos los españoles. El silencio de las élites dirigentes será estruendoso.@vonderleyeny@NadiaCalvinoseguirán soltándoles pasta.pic.twitter.com/0RRwKpBspN
The Spineless Socialist Prime Minister Lies and Deflects
Socialist prime minister Pedro Sánchez wrote a stunning post on X worthy of a eunuch:
The Government of Spain is fully committed to providing an immediate response to the situation in Ceuta.
We are mobilizing all necessary resources, working with Moroccan and international authorities, and preparing the necessary measures to restore normalcy as soon as possible. I just conveyed this to President Juan Vivas Lara.
This is the moment to build solutions, with responsibility and cooperation.
El Gobierno de España está volcado en dar una respuesta inmediata a la situación en Ceuta.
Estamos movilizando todos los recursos necesarios, trabajando con las autoridades marroquíes e internacionales, y preparando las medidas necesarias para recuperar la normalidad lo antes…
Sánchez es un traidor, un corrupto y un indecente. Actúa como el enemigo del pueblo español. La emergencia nacional solo puede resolverse echándole y sentándole en el banquillo.#Ceutapic.twitter.com/yLicTcD6hU
In July, Spain’s Supreme Court ruled that migrants intercepted at sea while attempting to reach Ceuta or Melilla cannot be summarily returned under the enclaves’ special border-rejection regime.
No wonder the PSOE (Pedro Sanchez’s Socialist Party) is at historic lows in Spain’s legislature. The party is rocking 26-27 percent in the polls. It’s not just the horror of being overrun by Muslim hordes; it’s been one corruption scandal after another since he’s been in office. Spaniards are hopeful he will get the boot by the end of the year, but the damage is already done.
'Is It Hate to Say That Africa Doesn’t Fit in Europe or That Spain Should Remain Spanish' – Vox Party’s Rocío de Meer
“It’s a lie that they are refugees fleeing from wars,” Rocío de Meer stated. “What war is there in Algeria? What war is there in Morocco?…pic.twitter.com/qYX26gQVgD
Many local shops were shuttered. Enrique Serrano, who runs a women’s clothing store in central Ceuta, told Reuters business owners were organizing themselves to protect their property and families in case of possible disturbances as they believed police resources would be insufficient.
“I’m not opening this afternoon because the situation is extremely tense… The first thing I have to do is protect my business and my family,” he said, adding that when the fence was breached after midnight, hundreds of migrants rushed through in a matter of minutes.
Bombshell Report from Islamized Spain
Moroccan Migrant Rape Gangs Turn Peaceful Spanish Paradise Manilva Into Narco-Rape Hell – Media & Authorities Stay Silent
Once a daytime paradise on the Costa del Sol, Manilva has become the new epicenter of drug trafficking and…pic.twitter.com/p4fATJKEXV
Ceuta, together with Melilla, another Spanish autonomous city located in North Africa, represents the European Union’s only land border with Africa. Both cities periodically experience surges in attempted crossings by migrants seeking to reach Europe. The last one in 2021 for Ceuta saw at least 10,000 Moroccan and sub-Saharan Muslim migrants swarm in.
BREAKING: Ceuta, Spain BORDERS HAVE OFFICIALLY "COLLAPSED"
"These people are coming in without any obstruction. Spain has a very left-wing government. They did amnesty for 1M+ aliens living in the country…that's what we call a PULL FACTOR."
VOX Deputy Rocío de Meer Sounds Alarm on Spain's Islamization in the Shadow of a New Mega Mosque
“Over the past thirty years, the Muslim population in our country has multiplied tenfold. The demographic and cultural changes we…pic.twitter.com/ggb61aTfXx
Images showed some of the migrants shouting “Long live Spain” as they charged over the border or out of the sea. That’s not a yell of patriotism… that’s a shout of conquest.
More than 100,000 migrants have entered Spain in the last 12 hours. The number could double by tomorrow.
All the Maghreb countries have organized a coordinated operation for several days.
Prisons have been emptied and their criminals sent over here to wage jihad in the coming weeks and months. The Spanish government must be arrested, tried, and sentenced to the harshest punishments.
The military received orders from Pedro Sanchez to let the migrants in and are just extras watching the scene.
Among them several thousand prisoners including jihadists, rapists and criminals released from prisons a few weeks ago by King Mohammed VI.
Several migrants say they’re ready to join France and the United Kingdom to wage jihad there, several have also claimed in front of the cameras that they were released from prison yesterday.
Army told to observe and let them in
Barcelona Spain Adding Razor Wire Defence To Homes
Whatever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me? And what about the ability to call it how it is? To call someone on their shit or make a joke and saying "fuck em if they can't take one"?
These are time tested checks and balances to stop the insane bullshit some weak people get caught up in, to their, and others detriment.
The title above is three phrases I personally have stated many times and a philosophy that fits well with my focus on the truth.
Zero Tolerance For Bullshit
Don't give them an inch, because they will take a mile. A well known and practiced saying that has been forgotten by the mob. Or another way I have always put it; I have a zero tolerance for bullshit. I don't accept any, not even a bit. Never have. It has served me well. Many people did not like it but in the end the truth needs to be told and if you don't accept anyones bullshit for a second it immediately shuts it down, rather than enabling their crap.
Today, the insane woke and the Borg jabbed bluetooth implanted masses linked to the hive mind have long forgotten these types of sayings. They have vanished along with the balls of the majority. The checks and balances have been eliminated and the insane are running amok.
For me these sayings have not been lost. I don't hate anyone. I have a passion for the truth and call it how it is. If someone is not speaking the truth, or spewing some bullshit garbage or takes offence to a joke about anything then my responses are still the same: "I have a zero tolerance for bullshit, bollocks cunt (fuck no), or fuck you if you can't take a joke".
This is not a crime, as much as the government and their conformist cheer leaders want it to be. We as humans can laugh at each others differences, we can call out each other on anything that violates natural law, or on our bullshit, and we can leave things as agreeing to disagree. We also don't have to apologize for having an opinion.
The masses are forgetting this due to being brainwashed into thinking it is ok to police speech. It is not. It never will be.
The totalitarian horde and the compliant Karens do not have the right to silence the truth. They do not have the right to fine someone or give them community service for using a word either. Any word.
The recent trial and prosecution of Shiloh Hendrix is an example of this madness. Genocidal manics are not being charged for mass murder due to their wars and poison bioweapon injections, yet someone who uses a word is punished. Pathetic.
The Shiloh Hendrix conviction should be overturned as should others like it, such as the people in England being arrested for social media comments. We should not accept these attacks on free speech.
Our political elite (scum) who fuck, murder and eat kids don't care about us calling each other names. They don't care about us at all. They are using hate speech as an excuse to silence the truth. Don't let them. Call it how it is. Do not comply.
We should be talking about the government’s growing network of detention centers and its family-separation policies, which have resulted in an estimated 145,000 American children experiencing the detention of at least one parent — including more than 22,000 U.S.-citizen children whose entire household of co-resident parents has been detained.
We should be talking about masked government agents, endless war, disappearing constitutional safeguards and an imperial presidency accountable to no one.
Every day — sometimes every hour — brings another outrage, another threat, another vulgar display of power, another self-glorifying meme, another political provocation and another distraction demanding our attention.
Before we can fully comprehend one assault on the Republic, another takes its place.
That is not merely the chaos surrounding this government.
It is one of the ways this government maintains power.
Keep the public angry, exhausted, frightened and distracted. Force everyone to chase the latest outrage. Crowd out serious scrutiny with political theater. Then push past another constitutional boundary while no one is able to keep track of what has already been lost.
This is how every crisis appears fleeting and every constitutional violation merely the latest controversy in an endless political spectacle.
Taken together, however, these are not isolated events.
They are tests.
Donald Trump is not defending the Constitution. He is testing how much of it he can violate before anyone stops him.
He is testing whether a president can wage war without Congress. He is testing whether federal power can be turned into personal power. He is testing whether dissent can be punished without formally outlawing speech. He is testing whether masked government agents can operate as a secret police force beyond public scrutiny and constitutional accountability. He is testing whether the government can watch, track and profile everyone without meaningful limits. He is testing whether the Twenty-Second Amendment, which limits a president to two terms in office, means what it says.
Most of all, he is testing how much abuse the American people will tolerate before exhaustion, fear, distraction and partisan loyalty wear down their willingness to resist.
That is the real constitutional crisis confronting America.
Trump has turned constitutional government into a continuous test of submission: He pushes beyond a boundary and waits. Will Congress resist? Will the courts intervene? Will government officials refuse? Will the public object? Or will everyone retreat, rationalize, delay and adjust?
If no one stops him, the violation becomes precedent. Then he pushes farther.
This is how a republic is dismantled — not necessarily through one dramatic declaration of dictatorship, but through a succession of constitutional violations that go unanswered long enough to become the new normal.
The administration’s approach to war offers a revealing glimpse into the instincts driving much of its conduct.
Asked about Iran’s promise to retaliate according to the principle of “an eye for an eye,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Trump’s policy is “a head for an eye.”
Not proportionality. Not restraint. Vengeance to the maximum.
The impulse behind that doctrine — to retaliate when challenged, punish when criticized, escalate when restrained and push harder when the law says no — is not confined to the battlefield. It runs through the administration’s approach to political opponents, dissent, immigration enforcement, executive power and constitutional limits.
“A head for an eye” may be Trump’s philosophy of war, but it is also a warning about the kind of government that philosophy produces. The result is a government at war not only with foreign enemies but with dissent, privacy, due process, constitutional limits — and ultimately with the American people.
Meanwhile, as the administration tests how much damage it can inflict and how many boundaries it can cross without consequences, the public is being overwhelmed by a relentless barrage of noise, spectacle and manufactured outrage.
And the costs of the government’s recklessness continue to mount.
The war with Iran continues to consume lives, military resources and tens of billions of taxpayer dollars.
This is what government without constitutional limits looks like: war without accountability, policing without transparency, surveillance without warrants, propaganda without shame and power without restraint.
The question is no longer whether the Constitution is welcome in America. The question is whether the government still considers the Constitution binding at all.
By all indications, the answer is no.
Trump will keep testing the limits of the Constitution until someone stops him.
Unfortunately, Congress has largely abandoned its duty to check presidential power. The courts increasingly allow constitutional controversies to be resolved through delays, procedural maneuvers and doctrines that shield government officials from accountability. Federal agencies resist transparency, police investigate themselves, and private contractors help the government evade constitutional limits.
And the American people are encouraged to treat every abuse as a partisan question rather than a constitutional one.
Login
