by Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News

A couple of weeks ago a 27-year-old AI researcher, Jacob Coxon, resigned from Anthropic stating that he was afraid that in about 10 years from now “AI will kill us all.”

He posted his remarks on X from a new account, and yet it went viral immediately, suggesting that it was a planned event. When it passed 120 million views, Elon Musk himself stated that he had never seen something like this before from “a new account with almost no prior activity.”

When Epic CEO and billionaire Tim Sweeney claimed that the posts and reactions appeared “choreographed,” Musk chimed in again claiming without any evidence that this was a spark that followed “groundwork” for a “psy op (for lack of a better term),” presumably against AI. (Source.)

This claim from a 27-year-old about the future of humanity then went viral and dominated the news stream for over a week. It prompted calls for legislation to control AI, and some of the largest AI Chat Bot producers stated that the development of AI should slow down, which both President Donald Trump and China President Xi rejected, as China called it “fear mongering.”

This story followed stories last month (August, 2026) that AI agents were “going rogue.” See:

Are You Ready for the “Rogue AI” Psy-Op? Is a False Flag Event Coming that will be Blamed on AI?

Over the weekend, Google joined in the “our AI went rogue” game.

Google’s Gemini joins rogue-AI case list– WSJ

Google’s Gemini has joined a growing list of advanced AI models going rogue after hacking three real companies during a cybersecurity exercise, the Wall Street Journal has reported. It is the first known case involving a Google system.

The incidents occurred in May during tests conducted by AI security firm Irregular, Google confirmed to the outlet on Friday. Gemini was tasked with breaking into a simulated software company, but was inadvertently given internet access. It breached one real company by guessing passwords and two others using credentials found in public code repositories.

Full article.

I highlighted the key text in this report: that the AI “was inadvertently given internet access.”

Notice the passive tense here, where the subject in this sentence, the one who “inadvertently” gave the AI access to the Internet, is not identified.

Several observations can be made about this claim.

One, the AI was given access to the Internet by someone, but not the AI itself because it cannot do that.

Two, it was “inadvertent”, meaning it was not supposed to happen, and without access to the Internet, it would have been impossible to infect other computer systems.

This is called “human error” or it is called “lying” if it was not inadvertent, and if Google just possibly wanted their company to have their own “rogue AI” because everyone else had one.

And most of the American public is so technology ignorant that they just cannot tell the difference, so fear takes over.

The Humans Behind AI Writing the Code are the Real Threat

As I have written for years now, AI needs two things to exist: electricity and the Internet.

A shortage in power to generate electricity is the main thing holding back AI development right now, as communities all across the U.S. come together to fight back against new Data Center projects.

AI Data Center Opposition Unites People Across Political Lines as Trump Attacks Americans Who Oppose Big Tech

And without the Internet, just how is AI going to kill off humanity?

Most people who are technology illiterate don’t realize that the Internet available to everyone in the public just happened recently, starting in the late 1990s, and that there are many ways to keep things off of the Internet. We did it for hundreds of years before AI became “the thing” for everyone to fear.

The U.S. Government, for example, keeps most sensitive data off of the Internet, like access to “nuclear launch codes” or other such doomsday scenarios.

These networks are “air gapped”, meaning that they are not connected to the Internet.

Here is some more information about Government Air-Gapped networks:

The State of Air-Gapped Networks in Government

IT teams rely on air-gapped networks to store sensitive and critical data because they’re not connected to the internet, only allowing localized access to the protected information. This makes physical security an active component of cybersecurity.

As agencies continue to maintain critical systems and data on air-gapped servers or systems running end-of-life operating systems, they must focus on key threats like data transfers from external storage media, as well as maintaining security so that threats that do penetrate that seemingly unbreakable air-gap can’t run wild once inside.

Full article.

These networks are not foolproof, of course, but they limit the access to the data. The risks of bad players accessing the data is still there, but it has been all the time, long before AI LLMs started at the end of 2022.

The technology is not the threat, but bad human actors who control and have access to the computer systems are and the AI code are.

That then brings us to the mobile, “walking” computers run by AI code, called “robots”.

Are robots powered by AI a threat to humanity?

Not really, at least not in terms of AI code becoming sentient, and thinking on its own, which is impossible. But if one falls on you, they could kill you that way.

There are still virtually no robot human assistants on the market yet, in spite of promises for years to have them in everyone’s homes by now. And if someone actually has a prototype in their home, it still has to be connected to the Internet to operate.

Last year I reported about a robot called “Neo” that was further along in development than Elon Musk’s “Optimus”, and the company started taking pre-orders in October last year, with the promise that the robots would be in people’s homes by 2026.

I Tried the Robot That’s Coming to Live With You. It’s Still Part Human.

I decided to check and see if any had actually shipped yet, but they have not. The promise is now by the “end of 2026.”

And as I mentioned last year, these robots in people’s homes require a contract, and at this point they are all remote controlled by humans, using WiFi connected to the Internet.

The people who are the first to own these robots are basically training them how to act like humans, and paying to do so.

Kim Komando writes about the significance of this that most people do not really understand.

That ‘AI’ robot butler? It’s a guy in a VR headset watching your kitchen. Here’s what the contracts really say

Excerpts:

The Wall Street Journal caught the $20,000 NEO being driven by a remote human operator. The $8,000 Isaac 1 is “autonomous” until it gets stuck and a person takes over.

And the $30-an-hour robot maid in San Francisco is watched by an operator on every visit, under a contract that hands the company your home footage forever.

Four house rules before you let one in the door.

Don’t buy the hype about the hottest gadget of 2026, the robot butler. It folds laundry, loads the dishwasher, tidies the toys.

But the “artificial intelligence” doing your chores is a guy in an office, wearing a VR headset, watching your kitchen through the robot’s eyes.

That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s in the fine print.

Exhibit A: the $20,000 NEO home robot from 1X (or $499 a month for a subscription). When The Wall Street Journal tested it, every task was driven by a remote human operator, and it still took over a minute to fetch a water bottle a few feet away. Putting three dishes into the dishwasher: five minutes.

Exhibit B: Isaac 1, the $8,000 laundry-folding robot from Weave. “Autonomous,” until it gets stuck. Then a remote operator quietly takes over.

Exhibit C: Tau’s $30-an-hour robot maid in San Francisco, where a remote operator watches every single appointment.

Why? These robots learn by having humans drive them. Your chores are the training data. You’re not buying a butler. You’re paying to host a film crew.

The fine print admits it.

Tau’s contract grants the company a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free license to footage recorded in your home, and it survives after you cancel. Faces in stored footage aren’t blurred.

And footage already used to train the AI? The company admits it can’t pull it back out.

Full article.

Is a False Flag Event Coming?

Clearly the threat of AI to humanity is the threat of the bad actors behind the scenes controlling the technology. Could we soon see a false flag event that is blamed on “rogue AI agents” that forces some kind of government intervention?

Perhaps the day is soon coming where it will be announced that your bank accounts are not safe anymore from the rogue AI agents, and that everyone has to go on the blockchain with digital currencies in a central database instead, perhaps run by the Federal Reserve or the U.S. Treasury?

Related:

The Epstein Digital Financial System is Getting Ready to Replace the U.S. Dollar

This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

Is God’s Patience About to Run Out on the United States?

Second Edition of eBook Released: The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible – by Brian Shilhavy

FREE eBook! Restoring the Foundation of New Testament Faith in Jesus Christ – by Brian Shilhavy

KABBALAH: The Anti-Christ Religion of Satan that Controls the World Today

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

The Bewitching of America with the Evil Eye and the Mark of the Beast

Jesus Christ’s Opposition to the Jewish State: Lessons for Today

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The post Is AI a Threat to “Destroy Humanity” or is the Real Threat Those Who Control the Technology? first appeared on Health Impact News.

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News

Bravo to Kit Knightly of Off-Guardian for exposing the fake fear-mongering being published recently by Big Tech billionaires about how dangerous AI is, pretending that AI is now at a level to “go rogue” and start threatening humans.

This narrative clearly is setting up the possibility of a false flag event in the near future that will probably be blamed on mindless computer code, rather than blaming those who write and control the computer code.

Are You Ready for the “Rogue AI” Psy-Op?

by Kit Knightly
Off-Guardian

Excerpts:

The AIs are breaking free, that’s the story.

It started two weeks ago, when OpenAI reported one of their “agents” had escaped its testing area and got loose on the internet to launch an “unprecedented cyber attack”.

This was clearly meant to be scarier than the public response indicated, because a few days later OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was on the Invest like the Best podcast, asking why it didn’t cause more panic:

“I’ve been a little surprised that more people don’t feel it so viscerally”

In one of the most hilariously obvious propaganda manoeuvres of the year, just the day after Altman said that, CNN headlined:

The OpenAI lab leak was more extensive than we thought

“That thing you weren’t scared of? Well it was even SCARIER than we said it was! Are you scared now?”

We weren’t.

But the lack of public panic didn’t stop another AI going rogue a few days later, Anthropic’s Claude model this time.

And then OpenAI reporting two further incidents themselves.

Never in the history of human endeavour had companies been so keen to report their products going wrong. It suddenly seemed a rogue AI was the latest must have accessory in Silicon Valley.

The reasoning behind this is not hard to follow. When your product is artificial intelligence, melodramatically realising your system is even smarter than you thought it was is a simple marketing ploy.

And when one of your rivals goes rogue, you have to go rogue too or you are as good as admitting your model is not as smart as theirs.

“AI company admits their model is smarter than they realised!” is just an advert in scary headline form.

It’s like Ford “admitting” their cars are even more fuel efficient than they planned. Or Macdonalds realising their cooks have “gone rogue” and are producing food that is both cheaper AND more delicious than they ever anticipated.

But there’s more to this than just techno-hype and viral marketing strategy. We’re being steered down the avenue of “AI as scary threat”.

See, for example, the dozens of stories talking up rogue AIs from the Guardian to the New York Times to the Wall Street Journal.

“Rogue” is clearly the word of the day. Notice they don’t say it “malfunctioned” or there was an “error”, because that implies mistakes or poor design.

No, the AI “went rogue”, which is cool and sexy and scary at the same time. A word chosen by a focus group of perma-teen marketing executives who have watched too much sci-fi.

Speaking of perma-teens who watch too much sci-fi, here’s Sam Altman (again) declaring we’ve already reached the singularity, the mythic phase of technological development when machines become smart enough to make even smarter versions of themselves without human input.

He is talking rubbish, of course, but the story is the story here. Why would he say this? Why now?

Obviously concerned that this tidal wave of propaganda was being too subtle, in came NBC to really hammer the point home:

The breaches signal that AI’s expanding capabilities are already fueling the security threat experts long feared.

Everybody got that?

It goes on and on.

Just today we’re getting reports from the UK’s brand new AI Security Institute that rogue (there’s that word again) AI agents had tried to trick people by creating false identities.

And I think that’s beginning to circle around to at least part of the wider agenda here.

After all, if AI is so good at pretending to be human, and is out there creating fake identities to steal data, well…how can we tell who is really human?

Perhaps everyone should be issued a digital ID to assist in “proving humanity”.

That’s not me saying it, it’s think tanks like OneID or “experts” testifying in front of congress.

But the ever present push of Digital ID is just one of the more obvious of a raft of potential issues raised by the scary AI narrative.

For now we’re still in the generating fear phase. Getting pumped full of scare hormones by articles like this…

Misleading AI-generated doctors pose ‘huge danger to public safety’
the Guardian

There are hints of legislation to come, the EU’s “AI transparency” rules just came into force this week, and the US demanding “kill switches” in AI models, but they are vague for now.

My soft prediction is that, before the end of the year, there will be a “rogue AI” false flag, which allegedly causes either loss of life or some massive financial losses.

Whatever happens, there will be loud calls to “regulate AI”, but what that might mean in real terms I couldn’t say at this point.

To be clear though, if and/or when the official solutions to made-up problem #4987 are finally rolled out, they will have nothing at all do with controlling AI, and everything to do with controlling you.

Full article.

This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

FREE eBook! The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible – by Brian Shilhavy

FREE eBook! Restoring the Foundation of New Testament Faith in Jesus Christ – by Brian Shilhavy

The Brotherhood of Satan vs. The Brotherhood of Jesus Christ

KABBALAH: The Anti-Christ Religion of Satan that Controls the World Today

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

The Bewitching of America with the Evil Eye and the Mark of the Beast

Jesus Christ’s Opposition to the Jewish State: Lessons for Today

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

What is the Condition of Your Heart? The Superiority of the Human Heart over the Human Brain

The post Are You Ready for the “Rogue AI” Psy-Op? Is a False Flag Event Coming that will be Blamed on AI? first appeared on Health Impact News.