Christian churches during the COVID Scamdemic.
by Brian Shilhavy
In John chapter 9 we have the incredible story of how Jesus healed a man born blind, and gave him eyesight for the first time in his life. It is a story that was not recorded in the other three historical records of the life of Jesus in the New Testament portion of the Bible.
It is helpful, however, to understand the context of this story, and why John probably included it in his own historical record of the life of Jesus Christ.
In the previous chapter, John chapter 8, Jesus clearly divided the Jewish believers of his day into two categories: those who truly knew God, whom Jesus always referred to as his “Father”, and therefore believed in and loved Jesus.
The other category of Jewish believers were those who religiously followed the Law of Moses and other Old Testament writings, but did not know Jesus’s Father, and therefore rejected everything Jesus taught, because it threatened their power base and position in Israel.
To these Jews, Jesus stated that their father was “the devil.”
Jesus stated a very important principle about “language” and understanding between these two groups, especially when it came to the truth.
Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me! (John 8:43-45)
When someone has believed something as true their whole lives, which in fact is not true, it becomes very difficult for them to change their minds and admit that what they held as true for so long is, in fact, not true, because it could have devastating consequences.
It is much easier to accuse the person who is speaking the truth as the one who is lying, than to accept a truth that could totally disrupt your life.
This was the situation with the Jewish believers during Jesus’s day.
For example, the Law of Moses had very specific ways of dealing with illnesses, and only a priest could declare someone “clean” or “well.”
So when Jesus appeared on the scene, who was not from the tribe of Levi whom the Levitical priests derived their authority from, and then started healing people outside of their system, it was a direct threat to their authority, and control over the people.
What John then does in chapter 9, is illustrate this truth with the story of the man born blind.
As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth.
His disciples asked him,
“Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
“Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life.
As long as it is day, we must do the work of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work.
While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”
(John 9:1-5)
The first thing Jesus does in this story is dispel a common myth believed in the Jewish religion at that time, that people born with disabilities must have been a result of someone’s sin.
Jesus also referred to himself as “the light of the world.”
Light chases away the darkness, so that things done in darkness can be plainly seen in the light, and therefore people can see the facts, or the truth, that the light exposes once the darkness is overcome.
Now, on to the miracle.
Having said this, he spit on the ground, made some mud with the saliva, and put it on the man’s eyes.
“Go,” he told him, “wash in the Pool of Siloam” (this word means Sent).
So the man went and washed, and came home seeing. (John 9:6-7)
This was a unique miracle. Many of the miracles of healing that Jesus performed were done through speaking, or sometimes laying his hands on people.
In this one, he spit into the dirt to make “mud.”
This reminds us that according to the writings of Moses, specifically in the first book of the Bible, Genesis, that God formed man from the “dust/dirt of the earth.”
The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. (Genesis 2:7)
There must have been some physical difficulties with this man’s eyes where the components we need in the physical realm to see were missing in him, since birth. Jesus apparently supplied whatever was missing that prevented him from seeing, by using dirt mixed with his own saliva.
This unnamed man recorded in John chapter 9 simply followed Jesus’s instructions, and began to have sight for the first time in his life!
Wouldn’t this be wonderful news for everyone who would learn about this?
No. This man’s simple act of obedience to Jesus that resulted in him receiving his sight for the first time in his life, defied the medical authorities of his day, who then began to treat him as a criminal, and then excommunicated him from the religious community for daring to defy the religious authorities.
Healing was not supposed to happen this way!! If the common people could get direct healing from Jesus themselves, what use was the current healthcare system currently in place, that was dependent upon religious and medical authorities?
Let’s look at the people’s reaction to this miraculous event.
His neighbors and those who had formerly seen him begging asked,
“Isn’t this the same man who used to sit and beg?”
Some claimed that he was. Others said,
“No, he only looks like him.”
But he himself insisted,
“I am the man.”
“How then were your eyes opened?” they demanded.
He replied,
“The man they call Jesus made some mud and put it on my eyes. He told me to go to Siloam and wash. So I went and washed, and then I could see.”
“Where is this man?” they asked him.
“I don’t know,” he said.
They brought to the Pharisees the man who had been blind. (John 9:8-13)
Notice how his neighbors and friends began a debate about whether or not this man had been born blind.
Even when he spoke up for himself to declare he was the same man, they could not understand his language, just as Jesus had said in chapter 8, because the truth did not conform to their own understanding of a world run by Satan.
So they brought him to the Pharisees, the authorities of the day, which would be the equivalent of reporting someone to the police/sheriff/ICE, etc. today.
Let’s see how the religious and health authorities of that day dealt with the fact that a man born blind could now see.
Now the day on which Jesus had made the mud and opened the man’s eyes was a Sabbath.
Therefore the Pharisees also asked him how he had received his sight.
“He put mud on my eyes,” the man replied, “and I washed, and now I see.”
Some of the Pharisees said,
“This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.”
But others asked,
“How can a sinner do such miraculous signs?” So they were divided.
(John 9:14-16)
Notice how, just like this man’s neighbors and friends, the religious and health authorities could not understand what this man was saying about his own experience.
It didn’t make any sense to them.
Their “logic” went something like this: Someone who breaks the Sabbath (according to their interpretations/opinions about how one keeps the Sabbath) is a sinner. Therefore, this man could not have been healed by a sinner.
So they questioned him again in their dazed and confused state, and this time ordered that his parents also appear before their judicial review.
Finally they turned again to the blind man,
“What have you to say about him? It was your eyes he opened.”
The man replied,
“He is a prophet.”
The Jews still did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they sent for the man’s parents.
“Is this your son?” they asked.
“Is this the one you say was born blind? How is it that now he can see?”
“We know he is our son,” the parents answered, “and we know he was born blind. But how he can see now, or who opened his eyes, we don’t know. Ask him. He is of age; he will speak for himself.”
His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jews, for already the Jews had decided that anyone who acknowledged that Jesus was the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue.
That was why his parents said, “He is of age; ask him.” (John 9:17-23)
Imagine what this poor man was going through, simply because Jesus healed him! He was being treated as a criminal!
His own parents abandoned him, because they did not want to get kicked out of their church/synagogue.
They feared the religious and health authorities so much that they abandoned their son and let him fend for himself. And their fears were confirmed, because their son was excommunicated from the church, for daring to the tell the truth.
Whatever social and medical benefits he might have been receiving by being a member of the Jewish religious community, he now lost.
But receiving his sight obviously held some value for him, so he dared to speak up and confront the hypocrisy of the religious and health authorities, and was then punished for it.
A second time they summoned the man who had been blind.
“Give glory to God,” they said.
“We know this man is a sinner.”
He replied,
“Whether he is a sinner or not, I don’t know. One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!”
Then they asked him,
“What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?”
He answered,
“I have told you already and you did not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you want to become his disciples, too?”
Then they hurled insults at him and said,
“You are this fellow’s disciple! We are disciples of Moses! We know that God spoke to Moses, but as for this fellow, we don’t even know where he comes from.”
The man answered,
“Now that is remarkable! You don’t know where he comes from, yet he opened my eyes. We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly man who does his will. Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind.
If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.”
To this they replied,
“You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!”
And they threw him out (of the synagogue). (John 9:24-34)
The man who had an encounter with Jesus that resulted in him receiving his eye sight, was declared GUILTY of sinning, and excommunicated from the church.
Are things any different today?
No, they are not.
The times and the names of the religious and medical authorities have changed, but people who encounter Jesus and receive healing from him directly are still being kicked out of the religious communities.
We all witnessed it during the COVID Scam. Church members all across the world were told to put a face mask on, practice social distancing, and get Trump’s COVID-19 “vaccine” to comply with the Operation Warp Speed military campaign.
If you didn’t comply with these edicts, you could not be part of the religious community anymore.
Nothing has changed. The churches, synagogues, and pretty much every other kind of religious organization serve Satan’s world system, and if you dare to not comply, you will be excommunicated, and possibly even thrown in jail.
The medical system today is a disease management system that does not bring true healing, which is only available through Jesus Christ. They speak the language of Satan, not Jesus, because to do so would put them out of business.
The medical doctors today practicing pharmakeia, which is the Greek word used in the Bible that is typically translated with English words such as “witchcraft” or “sorcery”, are the new “priests” of today.
The medical system is the largest business in the word, and they will attack anyone who does not bow down and worship them.
To learn more about the Satanic roots to the modern medical system, please see:
Related:
Comment on this article at Created4Health.org.
This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)
See Also:
Having problems receiving our emails? See:
If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.
If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.
The post When Believing in Jesus Christ Gets You Kicked Out of the Church first appeared on Health Impact News.
The tapes are out. Rihanna is talking. And Beyoncé’s carefully crafted image? Destroyed in seconds. She’s not just in the Illuminati. She’s not just a puppet. She’s possessed. Openly. Willingly. By a demon… with a [...]
The post Rihanna Reveals Beyonce Sacrificed 100 Babies for ‘Demonic’ Met Gala Diamond Dress appeared first on The People's Voice.
Erguendo-se sobre imponentes falésias, este farol, situado no concelho de Lagoa, guarda histórias fascinantes que vão muito além da sua imponente torre e da luz que guia os navegantes.
Tudo começou a 1 de dezembro de 1920, data em que o Farol de Alfanzina foi oficialmente estabelecido e começou a funcionar.
Naquela época, o seu funcionamento dependia do esforço humano, com a rotação da luz a ser gerada manualmente por uma pesada máquina de relojoaria alimentada a vapor de petróleo.
O progresso tecnológico trouxe grandes mudanças nas décadas seguintes, começando com a eletrificação através de geradores próprios em 1950, seguida pela ligação à rede pública e total automatização no início dos anos 80, até culminar numa remodelação completa com motores e sistemas modernos em 2004.
Hoje em dia, além de continuar a cumprir a sua missão de segurança marítima com alta tecnologia, o monumento tornou-se uma paragem obrigatória e um ponto de referência inesquecível para os amantes da natureza que percorrem o famoso Trilho dos Sete Vales Suspensos, considerado um dos percursos pedestres mais bonitos de toda a Europa.
The Pentagon’s advanced research agency is funding technology that gives the military a real-time control dial over the human body’s most basic functions, and there own documents reveal they are planning to keep the details [...]
The post DARPA Admits It’s Building Remote Controlled Human Body Hacking System: ‘Your Body Is Now Software’ appeared first on The People's Voice.
Non penso di esagerare dicendo che questo è veramente il colpo finalew a gli Stati Unitigli Stati Uniti: l’Arabia Saudita è appena entrata in un’alleanza simile alla NATO con il Pakistan, per cui “qualsiasi attacco a uno dei due paesi è un attacco a entrambi”.
Il simbolismo è straordinario: l’Arabia Saudita era in molti modi IL caso emblematico degli stati clienti degli Stati Uniti. Se loro non si fidano più delle garanzie di sicurezza americane, perché dovrebbero farlo gli altri? E naturalmente il fatto che questo sia realmente accaduto e non sia stato impedito dagli Stati Uniti è di per sé immensamente rivelatore. Questo ha così tante altre conseguenze che è quasi troppo da comprendere: –
Primo, significa che l’Arabia Saudita beneficia ora della deterrenza nucleare del Pakistan (e l’accordo include il nucleare: un alto funzionario saudita ha detto ad Al Jazeera che “si tratta di un accordo difensivo completo che comprende tutti i mezzi militari”, https://aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/17/saudi-arabia-signs-mutual-defence-pact-with-nuclear-armed-pakistan). Che significa che ora abbiamo ufficialmente due blocchi supportati dal nucleare in Medio Oriente: Stati Uniti-Israele contro Pakistan-Arabia Saudita. Inoltre, il Pakistan rifiuta esplicitamente una dottrina di “no first use” – il che significa che l’Arabia Saudita ha ora un protettore disposto a usare armi nucleari in modo preventivo. – Dato che l’81% delle importazioni di armi del Pakistan proviene dalla Cina (https://scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3302515/china-supplied-81-pakistans-arms-imports-past-5-years-sipri-says), significa anche che l’Arabia Saudita si è appena allineata indirettamente con il complesso militare-industriale cinese – Questo estende di fatto il Corridoio Economico Cina-Pakistan (CPEC) fino al Golfo Persico, protetto da armi nucleari pakistane e tecnologia militare cinese – creando un corridoio energetico sicuro dal Medio Oriente alla Cina che aggira completamente lo Stretto di Malacca –
Il tempismo è probabilmente tutt’altro che casuale, solo pochi giorni dopo l’attacco di Israele al Qatar, la prova ultima dell’inutilità della protezione statunitense. – Altri stati del Golfo, e probabilmente a tempo debito altri paesi “protetti” dagli Stati Uniti, esploreranno modelli comparabili nei prossimi mesi. Di fatto, questo potrebbe portare a un collasso a cascata del sistema di alleanze globali statunitense, portando a un intero nuovo sistema internazionale in cui le potenze nucleari regionali diventano fornitori di sicurezza. – Difficile vedere come questo non uccida permanentemente qualsiasi chance di normalizzazione tra Israele e Arabia Saudita: il Pakistan non riconosce Israele né e con questa alleanza i sauditi ora possono resistere alla pressione statunitense dato che non dipendono più esclusivamente da loro per la loro difesa – Mette l’India in una posizione estremamente difficile: il suo arcinemico è appena diventato il garante di sicurezza per uno dei suoi principali fornitori di energia – Questo uccide indubbiamente l’IMEC (Corridoio Economico India-Medio Oriente-Europa), la strategia di punta dell’amministrazione Biden per contrastare la Belt and Road della Cina, che avrebbe dovuto collegare l’India all’Europa via Arabia Saudita – C’è anche un aspetto monetario: questo è un altro chiodo nella bara del sistema del petrodollaro (un accordo per prezzare il petrolio esclusivamente in USD in cambio di protezione statunitense). L’Arabia Saudita è ora molto più flessibile nel prezzare il petrolio nella valuta che desidera E questo è solo ciò che è immediatamente visibile. Come parola finale: se qualcuno aveva ancora dubbi sul fatto che fossimo ora in un mondo multipolare, quel dibattito è ora chiuso per sempre. Il dominio globale americano non esiste più.
L'articolo Il Patto della Mecca è fine dell’egemonia USA in Medio Oriente proviene da Blondet & Friends.
È scritto nero su bianco sul programma. Il partito di Roberto Vannacci è il primo, completamente pro life e contrario all’ aborto.
Via le unioni civili, il matrimonio torna l’ unico istituto di coppia e le adozioni solo per le famiglie con padre e madre.
Per provare a invertire la crisi delle nascite, deroga al Patto di Stabilità europeo, che permetta di spendere in natalità prima di pensare a Green deal e riarmo.
«Il matrimonio rimane l’unico istituto di coppia, perché solo la procreazione ha rilievo pubblico», afferma Vannacci.
Il programma propone quindi l’abrogazione delle unioni civili e indica nella famiglia fondata sull’unione tra uomo e donna il modello da sostenere, con politiche fiscali e abitative, asili nido e congedi.
Futuro Nazionale è il primo partito anti abortista italiano: «L’aborto non è un diritto», le associazioni pro-vita devono entrare nei consultori. Il concepito viene ricoverato «come soggetto titolare di interessi giuridicamente tutelati» già durante la gravidanza.
Il posizionamento politico è quello del Movimento statunitense MAGA, che ha una posizione netta, a tutela della vita dal concepimento alla fine naturale, in linea con la dottrina sociale della Chiesa Cattolica.
È, dunque, un orizzonte valoriale del partito di stampo tradizionalista e conservatore. Chiaramente, il problema rimane l’ attuabilità, in un Parlamento liberale e Dem. Si tratterà di una sfida esplicita per tutti i partiti di centrodestra, che partecipano attivamente al Family Day o lo sostengono, che guarda ai Repubblicani USA, vincitori nel 2025 con un progetto assolutamente pro Life.
[24/08/2026 20:47] Maurizio Blondet: 🇷🇺 LA RUSSIA CHE PIACEVA ALL’OCCIDENTE: DEBOLE, SVENDUTA E CON GLI OLIGARCHI EBREI AL COMANDO
Cominciamo da un dettaglio che spesso viene accuratamente aggirato
SÌ: UNA PARTE MOLTO CONSISTENTE DEI GRANDI OLIGARCHI RUSSI DEGLI ANNI NOVANTA ERA DI ORIGINE EBRAICA
Non uno
Non due
Secondo la ricostruzione dello storico Yuri Slezkine, sei dei sette principali oligarchi della Russia di quegli anni avevano origini ebraiche: tra loro Boris Berezovsky, Vladimir Gusinsky, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Mikhail Fridman, Alexander Smolensky e Petr Aven
È un dato storico
E un dato storico non diventa proibito soltanto perché qualcuno teme che possa essere utilizzato male
Ma attenzione: questo NON significa che «gli ebrei conquistarono la Russia»
Significa semplicemente che, nella ristrettissima élite economica che acquistò un potere gigantesco durante la dissoluzione dell’economia sovietica, gli uomini d’affari di origine ebraica erano fortemente sovrarappresentati
Nasconderlo sarebbe sciocco quanto trasformarlo in una teoria razziale
Il problema non era la loro religione
Il problema era IL POTERE CHE AVEVANO CONQUISTATO
E qui comincia la parte davvero interessante
Dopo il crollo dell’URSS, la Russia di Boris Eltsin fu sottoposta a una privatizzazione selvaggia
Industrie
Petrolio
Metalli
Banche
Media
Materie prime
Una quantità immensa di patrimonio pubblico passò nelle mani di pochissimi uomini
Il sistema più famoso fu quello dei “LOANS FOR SHARES”
Lo Stato russo consegnava partecipazioni in alcune delle sue aziende più preziose come garanzia di prestiti concessi dalle banche private
E adesso arriva la parte meravigliosa
Le banche che organizzavano alcune delle aste erano spesso collegate agli stessi gruppi che poi vincevano le aste
Persino il Fondo Monetario Internazionale avrebbe successivamente riconosciuto che quelle procedure furono non trasparenti, che i prezzi ottenuti erano bassissimi e che il sistema generò diffuse accuse di corruzione e clientelismo
In sei aste su dodici vinse addirittura la banca che gestiva l’asta stessa
Una roba così elegante che oggi probabilmente la chiamerebbero:
TRANSIZIONE DEMOCRATICA
E mentre milioni di russi vedevano evaporare salari, risparmi e sicurezza economica, una manciata di uomini diventava immensamente ricca
Berezovsky
Gusinsky
Khodorkovsky
Fridman
Smolensky
Potanin
Aven
La famosa oligarchia russa
Una parte predominante dei suoi uomini più noti aveva, sì, origini ebraiche
Ma la domanda politicamente importante non è:
«Di che religione erano?»
La domanda è:
COME FECERO POCHISSIMI UOMINI A PRENDERSI UNA PARTE ENORME DELLA RUSSIA?
E soprattutto:
DOV’ERA L’OCCIDENTE MENTRE ACCADEVA?
Ah già
L’occidente stava aiutando Eltsin
Nel 1996, mentre il presidente russo affrontava una rielezione tutt’altro che assicurata, l’amministrazione Clinton fece pressione sul Fondo Monetario Internazionale affinché venisse approvato un prestito da 10,2 MILIARDI DI DOLLARI alla Russia
Il Washington Post lo scrisse praticamente senza bisogno di interpreti:
quel prestito rappresentava un evidente sostegno occidentale a Eltsin alla vigilia delle elezioni
Washington voleva la prosecuzione delle «riforme»
E quali erano quelle riforme?
Quelle sotto le quali una parte enorme dell’economia russa era passata nelle mani di pochi oligarchi
Curioso
Quando la Russia vendeva i propri gioielli industriali a una frazione del loro valore, era LIBERO MERCATO
Quando gli oligarchi finanziavano la rielezione di Eltsin, era DEMOCRAZIA
Quando televisioni e giornali controllati dai grandi gruppi economici si schieravano dalla stessa parte, era PLURALISMO
Quando Washington spingeva per sostenere economicamente Eltsin alla vigilia del voto, era naturalmente soltanto AIUTO ALLA RUSSIA
Meraviglioso questo vocabolario occidentale
Poi arrivò Putin
E Putin non «cacciò gli ebrei»
Questa sarebbe una semplificazione
Fece qualcosa di molto più rilevante politicamente:
RIDUSSE IL POTERE AUTONOMO DEGLI OLIGARCHI SULLO STATO
Il messaggio fu sostanzialmente:
potete continuare a essere ricchi
Ma NON POTETE PIÙ DECIDERE CHI COMANDA AL CREMLINO
Berezovsky entrò in rotta di collisione con il nuovo potere e lasciò la Russia
Gusinsky finì all’estero
Khodorkovsky venne arrestato
Yukos fu smantellata
Altri oligarchi rimasero miliardari, purché riconoscessero che sopra il loro patrimonio esisteva nuovamente LO STATO RUSSO
E questo è il vero punto
Putin non sostituì il capitalismo con il socialismo
Non abolì gli oligarchi
Non combatté una religione
CAMBIÒ IL RAPPORTO DI FORZA FRA DENARO E POTERE POLITICO
Nella Russia di Eltsin alcuni miliardari potevano condizionare il Cremlino
Nella Russia di Putin dovevano essere i miliardari a fare i conti con il Cremlino
Una differenza piccolissima
Talmente piccola che da quel momento, guarda caso, la Russia cominciò a diventare sempre meno simpatica
Perché la Russia degli anni Novanta era perfetta
DEBOLE
INDEBITATA
PRIVATIZZATA
PERMEABILE
DIPENDENTE
E con una classe dirigente convinta che per essere accettata dell’occidente bastasse vendere abbastanza patrimonio nazionale e chiamarlo «riforma»
Quella Russia sì che piaceva
Quella sì che era «democratica»
Poi Mosca cominciò nuovamente a pretendere di decidere da sola che cosa fare del proprio Stato, delle proprie industrie e della propria politica estera
E improvvisamente iniziarono le lezioni quotidiane sulla democrazia
DEV’ESSERE STATA UNA PURA COINCIDENZA
Quindi diciamolo senza falsificare nulla:
molti dei potentissimi oligarchi che dominarono la Russia di Eltsin erano di origine ebraica
È vero
Putin spezzò il potere politico di un’oligarchia che aveva approfittato della gigantesca svendita degli anni Novanta
Ed è una storia molto più grave della favoletta etnica
Perché quella svendita non avvenne contro la volontà dell’occidente
Avvenne mentre Washington sosteneva politicamente Eltsin e applaudiva quelle “riforme”
E forse è proprio questo il particolare che oggi sarebbe meglio dimenticare
ANCHE PERCHÉ IN UCRAINA LA STORIA HA PRESO UNA PIEGA TOTALMENTE DIVERSA… MA DI QUESTO PARLEREMO UN’ALTRA VOLTA
📚 FONTI: Fondo Monetario Internazionale; Washington Post; Treccani; Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century; Cambridge University Press
L'articolo Sui temi etici, “FUTURO NAZIONALE” (Vannacci) è il primo partito Pro-Life d’Italia proviene da Blondet & Friends.
Introduction by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
Originally published on October, 6, 2025 – updated with VIDEO on August, 24, 2026
Excerpt from American Thinker interview to American Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher
«The oncogenic potential of SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothetically proposed, but real-world data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, this large-scale population-based retrospective study in Seoul, South Korea, aimed to estimate the cumulative incidences and subsequent risks of overall cancers 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data from 8,407,849 individuals between 2021 and 2023 were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance database».
We can read in the Abstract of the Korean study Kim et al. titled “1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea” which was conducted by Hong Jin Kim (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung-in Regional Military Manpower Administration, Suwon) Min-Ho Kim (Informatization Department, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul), Myeong Geun Choi and Eun Mi Chun (both in Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, 1071, Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul).
The research was published on BMC Biomarker Research 13 (part of Springer Nature).
«The participants were categorized into two groups based on their COVID-19 vaccination status. The risks for overall cancer were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and data were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The HRs of thyroid (HR, 1.351; 95% CI, 1.206–1.514), gastric (HR, 1.335; 95% CI, 1.130–1.576), colorectal (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.122–1.468), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.254–1.874), breast (HR, 1.197; 95% CI, 1.069–1.340), and prostate (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.348–2.111) cancers significantly increased at 1 year post-vaccination» adds the Abstract.
«In terms of vaccine type, cDNA vaccines were associated with the increased risks of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers; mRNA vaccines were linked to the increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung, and breast cancers; and heterologous vaccination was related to the increased risks of thyroid and breast cancers. Given the observed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer incidence by age, sex, and vaccine type, further research is needed to determine whether specific vaccination strategies may be optimal for populations in need of COVID-19 vaccination».
The Korean study indirectly confirms the warning raised by two Chinese universities in October 2020, even before the Covid-19 vaccines were released, regarding the very serious risks of lung disease that both mRNA and mDNA gene sera could cause.
Furthermore, the study found that booster doses were associated with significantly higher risks of gastric and pancreatic cancer. For pancreatic cancer, the risk more than doubled in booster recipients.
These statistics confirmed the validity of the warning raised by the late virologist Luc Montagnier and British oncologist Angus Dalgleish.
More details below inside the analysis of American epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher.
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio – Gospa News director
Originally published by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH on Substack Focal Points – Courageous Discourse by McCullough Foundation
About a month ago, the first-ever population cohort study reported increased cancer risks following COVID-19 vaccination. In Italy, nearly 300,000 residents were tracked for 30 months, showing that mRNA shots significantly increased the risk of overall cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and colorectal cancer
Now, a second—and far larger—population-based cohort study by Kim et al from South Korea has corroborated and expanded upon those findings. Drawing on a massive sample of more than 8.4 million people, this is one of the most powerful cancer-safety datasets ever analyzed.
The results are striking. After accounting for age, sex, comorbidities, income level, and prior COVID-19 infection, COVID-19 vaccination was linked to significant increases in multiple major cancers, with the signal consistent across all vaccine platforms, both sexes, and age groups:
Interpretation: An HR of 1.53 for lung cancer means that vaccinated individuals developed lung cancer at a rate 53% higher than matched unvaccinated peers, over the same one-year follow-up period. Similar interpretations apply to each cancer type.
AstraZeneca Taken to British Court for as many as 80 Damages Claims on “Defective” Covid Jab
Interpretation: The elevated cancer risks were not confined to one vaccine platform. Whether adenoviral-vector (cDNA), mRNA, or mixed schedules, each vaccine type was associated with a measurable increase in overall cancer — and each had specific cancer sites driving the signal. In other words, no vaccine technology was free of cancer risk in this dataset.
Interpretation: Booster doses were associated with notably higher risks of gastric and pancreatic cancers. For pancreatic cancer, the risk more than doubled in boosted individuals.
New Study Finds Covid-Vaccinated Kids Face ELEVATED CANCER RISK, Immune System Damage
Interpretation: Both the overall and site-specific results show a consistent pattern — every demographic group experienced elevated cancer risks, though the type and absolute burden varied. Women and the elderly were hit hardest, but no population segment was spared.
Taken together, the evidence is now impossible to ignore. The only two population-level cohort studies ever conducted on COVID-19 vaccination and cancer — one in Italy and one in South Korea — have both found major increases in cancer risk.
The Italian study (≈300,000 people, 30-month follow-up) identified significant elevations in overall cancer, breast, bladder, and colorectal cancers. The South Korean study (8.4 million people, 1-year follow-up) confirmed and expanded these findings, documenting increased risks of overall cancer plus six site-specific cancers (lung, prostate, thyroid, gastric, colorectal, and breast).
Critically, the signal was observed across all vaccine types — both mRNA and viral-vector (cDNA) shots — and in every demographic group analyzed. In plain terms: both major COVID-19 vaccine platforms appear to be carcinogenic
With two independent national datasets converging on the same conclusion, governments, regulators, clinicians, and researchers must confront a sobering reality: nearly 70% of the global population has been injected with a carcinogenic product. The evidence demands immediate market withdrawal of these products.
17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES
At the McCullough Foundation, we are deeply investigating both the molecular mechanisms and the population-level data linking COVID-19 vaccination to cancer. We are currently preparing several new studies to expand this critical line of evidence.
This work requires substantial time, expertise, and resources, and we ask for your support in funding this urgent research: mcculloughfnd.org/products/donate-1
Oririnally published by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH on Substack Focal Points – Courageous Discourse by McCullough Foundation
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH – Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation
MAIN SOURCES
FOCAL POINTS – COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE
GOSPA NEWS – TURBO-CANCER AND VACCINES DOSSIER
RELATED TOPICS
Ryan Costello, Policy Director with the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), issued the following statement as the Trump administration moves to intensify its economic pressure campaign against Iran following months of war and instability:
“President Trump, the ultimate gambler in geopolitics, is poised to double down on a bad hand on Iran yet again.
“We’ve been down the maximum pressure road with Iran many times. What we’ve learned is that President Trump can impose extensive economic pain on Iran, but ordinary Iranians overwhelmingly bear the cost.. The ruling elite in Iran remains largely insulated, while Tehran has repeatedly refused to capitulate to Washington’s demands.. Trump’s gamble is that this time, amid the destruction of war, and with the reinforcement of a blockade, time is on his side and ultimately Iran will be forced to concede defeat.
“The pivot back to economic coercion comes with enormous risks the administration appears determined to ignore. After all, it was the United States that waived sanctions on Iranian oil already at sea during the height of the war in March, and again issued a waiver allowing Iran to sell oil freely in June. Now attempting to choke off those same oil sales exposes the contradiction at the heart of Trump’s strategy: Washington needed to relieve economic pressure when the consequences became too costly, yet is now betting that it can reimpose that pressure without suffering the same blowback.
“Within the United States, ordinary Americans are paying the price for this deeply unpopular war at the gas pump and in their grocery bills. Trump’s polls have plummeted amid the war - one he said he’d avoid - heading into all-important midterms. Continuing economic warfare risks deeper turmoil in the energy markets and the global economy, which could cascade into a full-blown catastrophe. Moreover, starting a trade war with China risks retaliatory measures that the U.S. economy can ill afford.
“Iran has also indicated clearly that it will not tolerate economic warfare and will escalate across the region, if necessary, to target any nation that supports President Trump’s efforts to cripple the Iranian economy. While the President may think economic warfare is less risky than military warfare, ultimately Tehran will view it as a different tactic in the same campaign to crush the country.
“None of this appears likely to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Rather, it appears intended to delay and avoid a deal that ends not just the war, but also the maximum pressure campaign that the President has waged since 2018. Oftentimes, admitting you have a problem is necessary in order to stop an addiction. President Trump has proven unable and unwilling to stop his gambling on Iran that risks further undermining U.S. and regional security and the global economy.”
The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.
Truth Warriors become a Truth11.com subscriber. Support Independent Media and get the Images + Memes pages plus all articles sent to your email.
A Heart for Space: An Astronaut’s Guide to Achieving the Impossible by Eiman Jahangir; Forefront Books; August 2026; 224 pages (Hardcover); $26.00. In August of 2024, the author of this insightful and inspiring book flew aboard Blue Origin’s New Shepard suborbital rocket. “People often assume that achieving a dream means following a straight line,” explains […]Yes, he’s still on the delusional “51st state” thing.
© Samuel Corum
– Dopo l’Iran, il bersaglio è la Turchia di Margherita Furlan
– Teheran corteggiata dal patto della Mecca di Jeff Hoffman
– Aquiloni e preghiere, Gerusalemme brucia di Jeff Hoffman
– Iraq, l’indipendenza con riserva americana di Jeff Hoffman
– Mosca: quelle officine sono già schedate di Margherita Furlan
– Londra arruola i mercantili contro Mosca di Margherita Furlan
– Pax Silica, l’assedio che non regge di Margherita Furlan
– Senegal, l’autostrada è cinese di Margherita Furlan
A cura di Margherita Furlan Con la collaborazione di Jeff Hoffman Editing di Mario Ferdinandi e Simone Orletti
CASA DEL SOLE TV — Informazione libera e indipendente Il nostro lavoro è possibile solo grazie al vostro sostegno. Casa del Sole TV non ha editori forti né finanziamenti pubblici: siamo sostenuti da voi, il nostro pubblico. Se credi nel valore di un’informazione che non tace, aiutaci a continuare.
Dona tramite bonifico bancario: IBAN: IT63P0326822300052392596590 Intestato a: LA CASA DEL SOLE EDIZIONI Causale: Donazione Casa del Sole TV
Dona tramite PayPal: paypal.me/casadelsoletv
Sostegno ricorrente: casadelsole.tv/sostienici
Anche un piccolo contributo fa la differenza.
Grazie di cuore!
L'articolo 🔴DOPPIO ULTIMATUM | TG 24.8.26 proviene da Casa del Sole TV.
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Aug. 24, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
The US military has resumed its campaign of bombing alleged drug-trafficking vessels after a two-month pause in a campaign that many legal experts and human rights groups believe constitutes a murder spree.
In a Monday social media post, US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) said it carried out a “lethal kinetic strike on a low-profile vessel operating along established narco-trafficking routes” in the Pacific Ocean on Sunday. Two people were killed as a result of the attack, SOUTHCOM claimed.
In announcing the strike, SOUTHCOM Commander Gen. Francis Donovan said the attack was part of a campaign of “imposing total systemic friction on narco-terrorists—disrupting their operations, dismantling their leadership, and eliminating cartel terror across the region.”
Donovan’s boasts about the effectiveness of the boat strikes in combating the drug trade come less than a month after a leaked a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) analysis revealed that the boat-bombing campaign has not “reduced the amount of cocaine entering” the country, as drug cartels have found alternate methods for shipping their product into the US.
With the latest two casualties, the boat bombing campaign launched nearly a year ago by President Donald Trump’s administration has now claimed the lives of at least 223 people.
Adam Isaacson, director of the Defense Oversight program at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), criticized the administration for resuming its boat bombings despite “overwhelming evidence that they are murder; that many, likely most, of the dead are either super-low-level or uninvolved with drugs; and that cocaine supply is unaffected.”
Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, delivered a similarly scathing assessment, commenting that “the Trump administration’s lawless killing spree at sea resumes.”
Nicholas Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, described the boat strike campaign as “murderous” and “illegal,” adding that its victims are “not terrorists” and “may not even be drug traffickers.”
Investigative journalist Camila Lourdes Galarza observed that “there’s still no proof any of the victims” of the boat strikes were involved in the drug trade.
Lourdes Galarza sarcastically added that if the victims had been drug traffickers, “the US would probably give them a deal” like the one given to Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras who was pardoned by Trump last year despite being previously convicted on narcotics trafficking charges.
When Sabrina Imbler’s cat, Melon, becomes seriously ill with what is later confirmed as feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), Imbler feels she doesn’t have time to wait for a formal diagnosis and turns to a Facebook group that connects desperate cat owners with a black‑market treatment: GS‑441524. Injecting Melon twice a day at home, they enter a frantic stretch in which the acidic drug causes a wound to open on Melon’s back, and she is sentenced to weeks in a hated recovery suit called a Suitical: “Melon was so upset that she lay on her side like a tipped cow for hours, her chin glumly fixed to the carpet.” With Melon finally fully recovered, Imbler has the space to look back on the desperate measures it took to save her.
The FIP Warriors contact met me in the lobby of their building, wearing a knit cap with cat ears. They proceeded to demonstrate how to deliver the medicine on their stuffed cat, Edward. I watched as they manipulated the stuffed toy, lifting up pockets in Edward’s “skin” into which I was to drive a 22-gauge needle at an angle into subcutaneous tissue. I paid $50 for two vials of injectable GS-441524, which was acidic to keep it shelf-stable. This acidity, the contact warned me, meant the injections burned. “It’s really best if you have help,” they told me. “Will you have help?” No, I told them. My ex was out of town and it was just me and Melon. “Well, you’ll figure something out,” they said. I would have to.
Login