❌

Normal view

Want to save the world? Start by unionizing your workplace

30 September 2026 at 20:41
TOPSHOT - People raise picket signs during the "Fight Starbucks' Union Busting" rally and march in Seattle, Washington on April 23, 2022. Photo by JASON REDMOND/AFP via Getty Images
https://www.spreaker.com/show/2952221/episodes/feed

“We are living in a pivotal moment in labor history,” Cole Rockarts writes in their new book Fired Up About Unions. “At a time when corporations have more power, profit, and political influence than ever before, workers are leading inspiring union organizing campaigns and taking on bosses to win big… Their struggles reveal that everyday people can unite, change their conditions, and build better workplaces and a better world.” In this episode of Working People, we speak with a panel of labor organizers across the USA and Canada about why labor unions are more important now than ever, and how workers organizing collectively can change their workplaces, their lives, and the world.

Panelists include: Hassan Husseini of the Public Service Alliance of Canada and Labor for Palestine – Canada; Tina Oh of SEIU Local 2 in Hallifax, Canada; Alex Raymond of Teamsters 322 in Virginia, USA, and Cole Rockarts, veteran labor educator and organizer and author of the new book Fired Up About Unions.

Additional links/info:

Featured Music:

  • Jules Taylor, Working People Theme Song

Credits:

  • Audio Post-Production: Jules Taylor
Transcript

The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. It will be updated.

Maximillian Alvarez:

All right. Welcome everyone to Working People, a podcast about the lives, jobs, dreams, and struggles of the working class today. My name is Maximillian Alvarez, and today we are talking about labor unions, why they are important, why they have always been important for working people, and why they are more important now than ever, and why you should be part of one. In their new book, Fired Up About Unions, veteran labor educator, organizer, and writer Cole Rockharts writes, “We are living in a pivotal moment in labor history. At a time when corporations have more power, profit, and political influence than ever before, workers are leading inspiring union organizing campaigns and taking on bosses to win big. These workers are fighting not just for themselves, but for their communities too. Their struggles reveal that everyday people can unite, change their conditions, and build better workplaces and a better world.” So this is what we’re going to be talking about today, and we’re really basing this conversation on Cole Rockhart’s great new book, which everyone should go read.

You can find it using the links in the show notes for this episode. And I’m really grateful to have Cole Rockarts themselves joining us on the show today. So Cole, welcome. Congratulations on this important book. Could you tell our listeners a little bit about the book and where it came from?

Cole Rockarts:

Absolutely. Thanks, Maximillian. It’s really exciting also to hear someone else read it because it’s just been in the ether for such a long time, so thanks for that. It’s very cool. So Fired Up About Unions, which again, you can get at BTL between the lines in Canada or AK Press in the US or your local library, give it an order there, really examines what unions are, demystifies the myths around unions, that we don’t need them, that they’re outdated, that young workers can’t be organized or different types of workers can’t be organized, and really lays the groundwork of why unions have become so weak in our respective countries in Canada and the US, and talks about why young people can be the antidote to all of the problems facing work and really unions themselves. Unions aren’t perfect, but if we take the view that unions are made up of people and we recognize that our coworkers are just regular people and we all ultimately want the same things, and that’s higher wages, protections at work, health and safety on the job, and better, that’s the great place where we can start to come together and change not only our individual situations, but as I say in the book, our communities and even beyond.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Hell yeah. And we’re going to be talking about how to do that, how to do better, get better, and fight better from the shop floor and beyond. And I’m so grateful with Cole’s help that we’ve pulled together an incredible panel of folks here, union organizers and members from across Canada and the US. And we’re going to dig into all this now, but first I wanted to ask if y’all could introduce yourselves to our listeners.

Hassan Husseini:

My name is Hassan Husseini. My day job is a national negotiator with the Public Service Alliance of Canada, which is the largest federal public sector union in Canada. As such, I’m also unionized member of Unifor Local 2025. Unifor is a merger of a couple of private sector unions in Canada, one of them being the Canadian Auto Workers that split from the American Auto Workers Union back in the 80s. And I am also a member of the National Steering Committee of Labor for Palestine Canada. I’ve been active in social justice and labor movement for 30 plus, maybe more years. Happy to be here. Thank you.

Tina Oh:

Hi folks. My name is Tina Oh. My pronouns are she/her. I’m joining in from Halifax, Nova Scotia here in Eastern Canada. My role is organizing coordinator with Service Employees International Union Local two. We’re the only national SEIU division in Canada, but I also have a role as vice president for Eastern Canada. So the region is all of Atlanta, Canada, Newfoundland, PI, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Really happy to be here.

Alex Raymond:

Hey y’all, I’m Alex Raymond. I am a mental health worker out of Richmond, Virginia, United States, and I am just a regular worker organizer, very new to the labor space, but very fired up to be here.

Cole Rockarts:

My name is Cole Rocker. My pronouns are they/them, and I am a longtime union staffer, although the veteran brand doesn’t sit well when Hassan’s in the room. I’ve been working for labor unions for the past 10 years, and that’s been in Canada and the US. And I’m now a labor educator at a healthcare union in Los Angeles. And I am the author of the forthcoming book, Fired Up About Unions, which is about why young people can change the working world and the labor movement.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Oh yeah. So maybe we need an updated taxonomy. We got veterans here and then we got legends with Hassan. So we got the full spectrum here, baby. And I’m so grateful to have all of you on and to hear all of your perspectives on this important subject. So I want to dive right in and ask y’all, what have unions meant to you over your lifetime? What did you know or not know about unions before being part of one? And I’m asking that as someone who does a labor show now, but knew jack shit about unions for most of my life.

Alex Raymond:

I kind of want to just directly responding to that, that was sort of my experience, that labor organizing in mental health, that’s really not a thing. But over the years that I’ve been in this industry, almost 15 years coming up this November, we just see wages decrease the amount of patients or clients that we are responsible for increase expectations going up while benefits go down. And a lot of us just silently accept that. We get into this line of work because we care and it almost feels like a betrayal to the work that we’re so committed to, to even think that better is possible. But it had always been a discussion. And growing up, my dad, he was an organizer with SEIU in Boston during his residency, and he would always tell me this story when he was laid off for labor organizing, that it was just the proudest moment of his professional life when all of his coworkers came to his shitty Boston apartment and they essentially shut the hospital down.

There was a lot of anxiety about what that would do to patients, but there was a lot of camaraderie and that’s something that’s missing nowadays. We’re struggling to get by and we deserve better. And I think that sort of bubbled up over the last couple of years. And a group of us got together a couple years back and we started organizing from the ground up, literally Googling how to make union. And we came into contact with a lot of people that have a lot of expertise and thank God because we needed all the help we can get. And we went from zero union density to more than zero and growing each and every month. And we formed a union here in Richmond, Virginia with Teamsters Local 322. And now there are unions with United Automotive Workers within our industry as well as National Union of Healthcare Workers and United Food and Commercial Workers.

And we’ve had to learn what all those acronyms mean and what they can mean for people in our field. And it’s been a huge thing. But from my perspective growing up, I’d always thought that was such an important thing to do, but just never really knew how to go about doing it.

Hassan Husseini:

From my experience way back when I first became unionized, and I think it’s still with us today, the thinking about unions is that it’s only about money. It’s only going to put more money in your pocket by increasing your wages from what you had before you were unionized. And to me, the thing that struck me, and I think it’s still with me today and in the organizing campaigns that I was involved in, it is really important for us to recognize and talk to workers about the fact that it’s about increasing your power in the workplace. It is about working class empowerment, and it is about some of the things that Cole just rhymed off with respect to health and safety, with respect to being valued in the workplace, giving your voice on so many different committees, and taking away the power, the exclusive power that bosses have without a union.

So I didn’t know that at the beginning. I came in, I though, okay, my wage will go up a little bit, not knowing that it’s going to give me so much more empowerment both individually and as a collective within the workplace. And that is something that opened my eyes to huge possibilities for that particular workplace I was in, but for the working class generally. And that lesson is still with me up to this point. I think things are getting even worse in terms of capitalist bosses propaganda that we can give you a little bit of a bump in your wages. You don’t have to go to unions because they know that when you unionize, you have more power in the workplace and that’s what scares the shit out of them.

Tina Oh:

Hasan, I’m just going to piggyback off that because I think that last point you just mentioned about how non-union workers are still gaining and benefiting off the winds of union workers is so relevant and I think that’s how I want to answer this question. It’s going to take me a second to get there, but I’ll get there. So my family moved to Edmonton, Alberta when I was two years old. My sister was five and it was just my mom and my dad. There was no other kind of family support systems that my parents had in Canada nor in Edmonton. So that like many non-economic migrants, that meant working traditionally low wage service jobs.

My parents have never worked a union job in their working careers in this country. And one of my dad’s longest held jobs was as a housekeeper and a janitor at the Western Hotel, and that was a non-union job. But the reason why that’s relevant is that that job, even though it was non-union, it was the first job that my dad had that gave us health benefits. It was the job that ended up getting us permanent residency so that we could stay in the country. And the reason why, of course, that connects to unions is because the work of the private sector hotel unions that have raised the industry standards to the point that these non-union hotels cannot recruit workers without offering health benefits, without offering them a pathway to permanent residency. And so I think about that job, especially now that I work for a janitor’s union, SEIU Local two, half of our membership is janitors, private sector contracted out janitors.

And now that I’m in this role and I think back to my childhood and the horrors really that my parents had to face in their working careers, I know absolutely without a doubt in my mind that our lives would’ve been better had my dad had a union at that hotel or any union really. And at the same time, I also can see how our lives still greatly benefited from the wins of the working class that have progressed the labor movement to the point where non-union jobs are still offering health benefits and whatnot. So I just wanted to leave that there.

Cole Rockarts:

I think for me, it’s a bit of a combination of all these things. As my co-podcasters have just said, a union can be the difference between having healthcare or not, having benefits or not. When I was younger, I didn’t realize that my mom was unionized. She was a teacher for many years before she retired, and it wasn’t until I started getting involved in my student movement. And in Canada, the student union system is quite different than in the US, and I think the US should absolutely steal this idea from Canada. But many of our student organizations that fight for lower tuition fees or free tuition or more rights for international students or different campaigns of equity on campuses are unionized. So my first foray into having a union was starting to work at the student union and run all these campaigns as a student organizer.

And so it wasn’t until I started getting involved that I had this conversation with my mom about, “Oh, there’s this union.” And I was told to go to a meeting because there’s free pizza and I wanted free pizza. And she said, “Oh yeah, I’ve been involved in my union. I was a shop steward.” I was like, “What the hell is a shop steward? What does that even mean? And it’s essentially the person that represents the workplace while they’re actually working in there, and you can go to them with questions about your contract or different issues you’re having.” And I said, “What? You were a shop steward?” She was like, “Yeah, I used to carry the book and the book is the contract.” And I said, “I didn’t know that.” She said, “Yeah, I’ve been out on strike. I’ve been on the picket line.” And so it was years later that I realized like, “Oh my God, my parent has been a union member, has fought for these things, and it’s because of her that I have the life that I have.”

Maximillian Alvarez:

It’s always so fascinating to me to hear stories like yours and the stories that folks have shared with me on this show for the past nine seasons. I always tell folks that I am endlessly fascinated in the stories of our fellow workers who take that step to do something, to change their conditions, because I lived most of my life not knowing that that was an option. Like most people in this country, I’m talking about the US here, when I had crappy jobs, whether they were in service or factories, warehouses, retail, I thought I only had two options. If the job sucked, I could either just stay, grin and bear it, or leave and try to find something better. I didn’t know there was a secret third thing you could do and band together with your coworkers and fight back and stay and fight to improve things.

And so to me, anyone who takes that step, especially in a country where working people are so routinely reminded and conditioned to believe that we are powerless, anyone who says otherwise and does otherwise to me is a hero. And not just that, but the way it changes your perspective on things to take that step, to organize, to bring your boss to the bargaining table, that really changes a lot of the ways that you look at the world and yourself and the work that you do. And I wanted to turn that into a question for y’all. You talked about this a bit in the first round, but I wanted to ask if you could go a little deeper and say how it changes your life at work and beyond when you become part of a union or join a union drive. Did it change the way that you guys all look at your own work in life when you did that?

Tina Oh:

For me as a young person that started labor work, I think I was 21 at the time when I first got my union job. And of course, previous to that, I was part of the student union like Cole was. And we’re living in a time where obviously we can talk about all these crises that are happening, global crises to mention that, and union work really helped make the world make more sense, if that makes sense. And I think a lot of young people, and when I reflect back to what I was thinking through when I was 21, and I’m not saying obviously I’ve got it all figured out now, certainly don’t, but I think a lot of young people are probably really confused and puzzled by all these kind of disparate crises when obviously they’re all interconnected. And maybe we could even say that they are interconnected, but it wasn’t really until I really immersed myself and understood how power works and the history of the gains that workers have made to really push the needle to where we are today.

Things really just started to click. And now when a new crisis happens in the world, it’s just less confusing for me. And I think that’s relevant because that feeling of hopelessness I think really gets reined in when you are in a fighting union because that fighting union is then about solutions and it’s about optimism and it’s about hope. And it’s also about, yeah, we might lose, but we’re just going to get back up the next day and fight again. And so that clarity really became clear when I was part of a union drive and helping workers form unions at their workplace. And seeing the transformation happen to them was so transformative for me because I’m seeing it in real time, ordinary people coming together to do extraordinary things.

Alex Raymond:

Yeah. Tina, hearing you say that, especially that piece about hopelessness was something that was deeply more so than I think I’ve even been aware of in my personal experience of work and working up until the idea that there could be something better came up in my working with this organizing that we’ve done recently. Meeting people across the country that are fighting for change and are in the exact same position. We are inexperienced, we are outnumbered, we are dealing with a very effectively organized managerial group that wants nothing more than to see us lose. And then seeing people like Sean and Noah out in Massachusetts, workers out in California coming together, Jane and Colin out in Marilyn, all these different people that I would not have met had not been for this organizing work changed a lot of that hopelessness into a deep sense of optimism that’s going to be really, really hard to lose.

And that I think is the most important way my life has changed since participating in organizing. And I see it at home, at work. We have this current style of people coming in and out of care work and healthcare, and it’s hard on us. We’re job hopping a lot, but it’s really, really hard on the clients that we serve. We work predominantly for little kids and somebody comes in, they build a relationship with you, and then you can’t afford to work the job anymore, you get burned out. And that’s devastating for those young people, and we want to change that. And since we’ve started organizing, we’re seeing turnover rates decrease. These people believe that better is possible and that possibility is brought into existence through our collective action. We alone can’t formulate what a solution might look like, but collectively we’ve found answers and we’ve put them into practice, not just in one location, but in lots of other locations.

And we’re seeing people pick up the banner with us, and it’s just been one of the most inspiring, if not the most profound experiences of my life. And hearing you speak on that just reminds me why I’m part of this fight.

Hassan Husseini:

This is a really good segue because most of you have done the organizing part, which is the hard part to organize workers into unions. My role as a national negotiator is that I come in to work with these newly organized group of workers to get in place a first collective agreement, which is challenging in and of its own, but it’s during the negotiations for a collective agreement. Well, actually it is during the organizing drive that you see their power and a recognition of the power that they have really come into fruition. But it is also a different kind of a very, very rewarding process when you’re working collectively with workers, trying to get a new collective agreement and seeing the bosses push back to put language in collective agreements that gives them more rights, more powers, more protections, more provisions. This is where you see that they are solidifying their power in the workplace and there’s nothing like it because at times when we’re negotiating new terms, and I’ve negotiated terms in the new collective agreement in the university sector, in the gaming industry, right now I have a group of firefighters in an indigenous community in Southwestern Ontario that I just came back from starting negotiations with them.

And you’ll see that their questions is that, “What do you mean we can put language in the collective agreement that is better than the minimum standards?” It’s like, yes, you are organized in order to do that. Minimum standards, you’re protected by it anyway, but your collective agreement, it relies on your power in the workplace, your power in the community, and you’ll see the relationship with their coworkers, their relationship with the boss, their relationship within the community completely changes. It gives them the confidence, it gives them the power, it gives them the power that comes with the fact that when they’re sitting at the bargaining table, no matter what, they’re equals to that boss. And of course, when the boss goes back to the workplace, they try to play games, but you cannot put back, what is that expression, the genie in a bottle or something?

They’ve recognized their power and they’re willing to take that extra steps in order to keep building on it and to demonstrate it in the workplace and outside the workplace. And there’s nothing, nothing, absolutely nothing like it when work is recognized, I want to go Tina’s original point, recognize the power that they have in the workplace and in the community. And I’m privileged, I feel, that I get to work with workers to try to put together collective agreements that give them that extra power.

Cole Rockarts:

Yeah, I’ll just pick up on something Hassan said in his current negotiations about raising the minimum standards. And as organizers and workers, we talk about expectations a lot and great folks have written about raising expectations, so I won’t go into too much of that. But when people realize that not only can they raise the floor at their job, like Alex said, that he could change the mental healthcare industry and the ability for him to have consistency with his clients, with the kids that he’s trying to serve, that’s very mission-driven work. And we see all the time workers in organizing drives, particularly in healthcare, but lots of places, education where they say, “Well, I don’t know if I could do this because I would put the kids or the patients or whoever it is at risk.” But a lot of these campaigns are about connecting, “Well, this would actually make things way more sustainable for the work that I’m trying to do.

This would make me stay. This would help raise my wage so I can provide for my family.” All of these things go back to that question of power. And so when I think about how it changed the way I look at work and life, particularly now coming from Canada and the US, there is an entire industry that is dedicated to crushing workers’ ability to do this. And it has a lot of money behind it. It has a lot of politicians behind it. I mean, the US, we look at right to work states. We look at what is going on in Alberta, Canada right now and the attacks on trying to privatize our healthcare, which is a big no-no in Canada.

We workers, workers historically fought for all these things to get a public healthcare system to get funding. And so I think this’ll go to a little bit about the power that we’re up against, but we also talk about how we don’t have, and it’s because of people crushing unions, we don’t have a lot of money. We don’t have the ability to match dollar for dollar what our bosses are doing, but what we do have is people power. And so I think I was lucky enough to get into it at 20, but since moving here, even in the past few years, I’ve completely changed the way that I see power and what workers are up against as well.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Yeah, man. I mean, in the good old US of A, I mean, we have many rights on paper, but not in reality. And I’m constantly telling folks that you have a right to be a part of and form a union and collectively bargain in your workplace in this country. But in this country, that’s basically saying that Frodo Baggins has a right to go into Mordor, right? I mean, the opposition that you’re going to face, the pain that you’re going to be put through, the system that’s going to chew you up and spit you out just for exercising that right is going to take a lot from you and your coworkers, and you need to be prepared for that. And that’s what I wanted to talk about here in this round. Let’s talk about the hard stuff because we’ve seen over the past few years, over the course of me doing this show, I’ve heard it in the stories we’ve reported, this boom in energy around new labor organizing from the Starbucks workers to the Amazon workers, to the independent union movements, to the revivals within the established unions like the UAW, the Teamsters, some of the historic strikes that have happened in Canada in the past five years.

A lot is clearly happening, but at the same time, I think a lot of folks who got swept up in that energy over the past five years have also come to the hard kind of realities of unions aren’t perfect. Labor law is stacked against you. There’s going to be a whole lot of crap that you’re going to have to go through, but it is worth it. And so I want to talk about that with you guys and sort of address head on these real issues that folks have had or will face when trying to organize. So let’s talk about what people are really going to be up against when they try to unionize today in the US or Canada. And if someone’s listening to this, what do they do when their union sucks or union officials break their heart and screw them over?

Hassan Husseini:

You’re right. There are a lot of unions that, to put it in your words, can break your heart. But I always say having a union, even a shitty union is better than not having a union at all. Because even with a shitty union, there are mechanisms that you can do internally within your union in order to challenge those leaderships that are not willing to fight a good fight on your behalf, but collectively on behalf of all the workers and the community. So definitely I think we’re all on the same page or should be on the same page that unions are better than no unions whatsoever. But we also need to recognize that there are a lot of sellout unions or leaderships within unions that are no longer willing to fight a good fight. They’ve become part of the institutionalized capitalist system. They’ve lost the vision and they don’t advance anything more than protecting their careers.

And they have forgotten that unions are, after all, also political organizations of the working class. And they’ve lost that. And that’s where you see some unions or some leadership within unions making decisions that end up harming workers that they’re supposed to represent. But it’s not the end of the world because I always say that what you need to do as workers, the union is yourself. So you organize internally, you organize in order to bring democracy back into your union and your workplace. And you organize to take over, to take back those unions from those careerist elements within the union movement. Those who are willing to and understand and have class consciousness and they are fighting a class war to go back to the classics. This is the reality of it. And they’re not going to advance a lot of workers if they compromise with the employer on some fundamental issues.

And so our work is premised on the fact that we believe in the power of workers, but we also need to be very realistic about what kind of unions we’re dealing with. And also in my work in organizing in solidarity with the Palestinian liberation struggle and Palestinian workers, I’ve realized that the connection between those unions who are taking better positions in solidarity with international workers around the world is very much connected to how much they’re willing to fight for their own members and for the working class in Canada or the US. And those who have sold out when it comes to the class struggle in their own workplaces and communities and in Canada and the US, you find them that they’re not willing to actually be in solidarity internationally. They may pay lip service, but they don’t do anything concretely to honor that global picket line of the Palestinian people.

And as it was before, the people of South Africa that fought against apartheid. So they’re connected. Good fighting working class unions that have clarity of purpose are also clear on the local, on the national and on the international issues. And we have no choice but to continue to fight a good fight internally to make sure that they stay on the straight path or the left path rather.

Tina Oh:

I want to hear from you, Alex.

Alex Raymond:

Yeah, I’m itching to jump in on this one. So what you’re up against, you hear, especially when you’re new to this, “Hey, there’s the NLRB, you have these rights and the NLRB will adjudicate if there’s any unfair action taken against you by your employer.” But my boss, Lindsay Thompson straight up fired me in writing for labor organizing and that’s still in NLRB hell. And we’re expecting a ruling any decade now, probably 2035, 2045, my grandkids will get a decision passed down. So I mean that’s the reality of it. And I’ve got some comrades that have similarly experienced pretty nefarious dealings from their employer because who’s going to stop them? They fire you, you’re kind of done for. And then on the heels of that, my union internally was going through a little bit of drama precisely when I got fired. And that happened to create a really perfect storm that weakened our bargaining unit and set us up for a lot of trouble going into 2026.

But what is the solution? To quote the adage, don’t mourn, organize. And I remind myself that these things, these institutions that exist today were built by the literal blood of people that were massacred and organizing in significantly more difficult conditions today. I lost a job, I got a new job. I wasn’t brutalized in the ways that you encounter in the history book. So not discounting the struggles that people are facing today, it’s just that the solution remains the same, which is you organize. And my union, we organize internally, brought it up to the local president. They got it fixed. He’s out there on the line with us, every opportunity he’s got. And they’ve done an incredible amount to organize with us. And not just Brian Payton with Teamsters Local 322 and a huge chunk of amazing UPS workers, Jennifer Hancock, those folks coming out, making sure that we’re all right and that this group of workers gets represented fairly.

But the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, especially their caucus of rank and file electrical workers, it’s an internal caucus that has come together and shown up for workers in Richmond and across the country in really profound ways. If there’s a worker struggle in town, there’s going to be hard hats there. And I think it’s that kind of ethos that we need to really embrace. One worker’s struggle is my struggle and it’s been really hard. There was an understandable amount of almost desperation when we did everything right and the employer is just able to break every rule and get away with it. But I think it taught us a very valuable lesson, which is that you don’t just win a vote and then you’re all done. You organize not just to win a contract, but then to enforce it and then to be able to have the capacity to show up for other workers because there’s not just one fight and then you’re done.

This is a global fight. The cause of every member of the working class is our cause. So this is the fight of a lifetime, not just for a contract or a vote or some particular grievance. So I think it’s been hard, but we’ve learned a lot of lessons and we’re continuing to learn. And a lot of that is because of the very cool people that are on this panel today. So shout out to y’all.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Well, and obviously the fact that we have such an incredible panel of folks from Canada and the US, and Cole, you came from Canada to the US. I was wondering if you could also wrap into this question the differences of the situations and the things that folks are going to face in the US versus Canada while we’re answering this question.

Cole Rockarts:

Absolutely. I think I have two different parts to this answer. The first is that I think in Canada we have a different history when it comes to not only our labor movement, but our political parties. I think in the US, you folks are locked into the two party hell, that is the Democrats and the Republicans. Our system in Canada is multi-party and we had a labor movement that formed a political party that became the new Democratic Party, the NDP. And those were the folks I mentioned earlier that led to Medicare, healthcare being public in this country. And I say that not to give a knighthood to politicians because we know that everything that we’ve won in any country has come from workers pushing for that and pressuring that and always will be, always has been. And so I think that’s one of the big differences.

And obviously in the negotiation realm, when you don’t have to think about Medicare or healthcare being part of the contract and you can instead think about the things in Canada that haven’t gotten into that system like drug care, prescriptions, it changes the negotiation landscape for sure. I think the other big difference is the matter of density. And I mentioned the word density earlier, but that is how many workers percentage-wise are unionized within a given population. So in Canada, that is much, much higher. In the US, it’s brutal and it shows all of the things that have –

Maximillian Alvarez:

We’re below 10% now, I believe. That’s

Cole Rockarts:

Correct. And I’ll just say to your listeners, the Economic Policy Institute put out this amazing report about what would change if union density in the US was higher. And the reality is we would have healthcare. We would have about, give or take, 7,000 extra dollars a year in your pocket. And I don’t know about anyone else on this call, but I think people could use 7,000 plus dollars a year.

Maximillian Alvarez:

And that’s $7,000 a year that you would get in your contract versus the kind of fantastical fake $5,000 that President Trump is promising you if you just believe him and vote the way he wants in the midterms.

Cole Rockarts:

Exactly. And I’ll just say quickly on that, studies have shown that in countries where there are strong labor movements, there are more democracies. Even if we look at the US, we see that in right-to-work states, there are more attacks right now on the voting system than there are in states with higher union density. And so that’s kind of the first part of the answer to my question. But the second part is how is Canada and the US different? They’re not. Workers in Canada and workers in the US coming from both places, they’re not that different. They want the same things. They want higher wages, they want benefits, they want good jobs, and they want clean air and for the AI overlords to not ruin the planet and put a data center in their backyard. And so same as it ever was, workers, no matter the country, if they can get enough power, they can change things and make things better.

Tina Oh:

Everything yes, that Cole just said, a thousand percent. I just want to say genuinely, SEIU, it’s a giant of a union, one of the biggest in the US. And so when I look at my comrades in the US, not just in SEIU, but US unions in general, I really don’t have a problem in saying, I genuinely think it is harder to organize in the US than it is in Canada. And I don’t mean to say that as good or bad, as simple as that. But I think where in Canada workers have made gains like card check, which is a one-step unionization system. All you have to do is sign a union card. There’s no vote. Where there’s successor rights in the three biggest provinces of our country. So Quebec, Ontario, BC, the most populated provinces have successor rates. That means contracted workers when there’s contract flip that the new employer has to hire them on and keep their contract.

Those are two really sizable, genuinely… Those are huge wins, legislative wins that workers have made in this country. And it has, for maybe a less sophisticated word, I think it does actually produce some lazy organizing when I compare it to my comrades in the US who have to strike for recognition or right to work states where the dues aren’t guaranteed. And part of that lazy organizing is it can get dangerous, of course, because we know, just as Cole said, the bosses are the same. The power that they have will absolutely crush us. Our dollars can’t compete. Our legal can’t compete. And so when organizers on the ground, whether it’s a member organizer, worker organizer, staff organizer, is taking these shortcuts, we know we’re going to get hit by those shortcuts down the road because a fight is coming guys. A fight is always coming. And so I think it’s a really important, I think, moment for Canada-based organizers where even though we’ve made those gains like card check-in successor, that we do the right thing, which is to develop and recruit the best leaders we can in our organizations and keep it a fighting organization.

And that means yes, there might be shortcuts, but we’re actually going to do the really rigorous spade work that is required to build a fighting union.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Hell yeah. I thought that was all beautifully and powerfully put, y’all. And it bears mentioning that you could say the same thing about unions here just a little farther back in our history. I mean, the union density in this country at its height was around 30% or a little over. I mean, unions built the middle class, they gave us the weekends. We know all the talking points, but then that middle class gave up on the struggle. They cared more about their middle class existence, their specific contracts. They lost that sense of working class solidarity. And here we are 40, 30 years later with the results. Union density below 10%, wages have been stagnant or declining, cost of living has been going up, power has been shifting to the top away from the bottom. So I think the real takeaway message from Canada to the US to everywhere is don’t get complacent.

The struggle has to continue, and I could genuinely talk to you guys for hours about how to continue that struggle. And I’m so grateful for the conversation that we’ve had, but I know we have to wrap up here. And so I wanted to finish with a big picture question that y’all have touched on in this conversation, but for folks who are listening to this right now and saying, “Yeah, that all sounds great, but why should I care about unions now in the year of our Lord 2026 when the world is on fire and everything sucks and these oligarch nut jobs are taking over everything and destroying the planet?” So what would you say to folks in closing who are still in that head space?

Alex Raymond:

Yeah, what I would say is why you should care about a union now is because things have already gotten to a point where we’re feeling the everyday economic ramifications of those decisions. And whatever inertia is kind of keeping us moving in this direction, if we can overcome that, if we can come together, we can identify any solutions that need to be found and start putting them into practice so that we can build a future that we want to be part of. And I know that sounds like fanciful language, but every small step in the right direction is also a step we’re not taking in the wrong direction. And it feels difficult. It feels impossible. It feels exhausting when you think about it individual terms, but you’re not alone. People like me don’t know a ton. I’m sitting on a panel today with Hassan, Cole, Tina, and you, Max, and there’s a lot of expertise out there and you’re not alone.

So nothing weaker than the feeble strength of one. We got this together.

Hassan Husseini:

Very briefly, I think that for all the reasons that you spoke about Maximilian, it’s for all these reasons, because the world is run by not oligarchs, it’s for the reason that they’re destroying the planet, the reason that we have Trump in the White House and Mark Carney in Ottawa that are governing on behalf of banks and corporations and the super rich. It’s for all these reasons that we need unions if for nothing else to equalize things, to make sure that they fight for working people on the shop floor, but also they continue to fight for better society, for all the working class. And also they continue to make sure that international solidarity is not just a performative thing, but a real element of the work of unions. And without unions and without organizing and without that kind of mass democratic organizations that we value so much, that we will fall back even more.

And so from that perspective and because of that, unions are a lot more critical today than in my opinion, they were 50 years ago or 60 or 70 years ago. And we finish on the adage again that an injury to one is an injury to all. So this is not about individual protection, it’s about a collective work, a collective organizing and collective protection and collective empowerment.

Tina Oh:

I think a good union organizer knows how to answer any question with the answer being union. And so to me, it’s why should people care about unions? Well, it’s less about why people should care about unions, more about do you want a better life for you and your family and your loved ones? If so, the only answer is union. And I believe that. We just talked about the trickle down effects of increasing union density is that we live in a better society. There’s healthcare improvements, education improvements, life expectancy, I’m sure. And so I think that question that Cole talked about, workers in US, Canada, across any border, they want a better life for themselves and their families. I don’t know a single ordinary working person that doesn’t. And the answer to that question is going to be union.

Cole Rockarts:

Couldn’t agree more. I think the answer is unions. If we look at the world being on fire, what’s going to protect workers that are going out in increasingly record-breaking heat working outside if they’re postal worker, construction laborer, what is going to do that? Is the boss going to say, “Oh, I’m recognizing it’s a bit hot and unsafe out there. This doesn’t need to get built today. This work doesn’t need to get done.” No, bosses are going to continue to try and extract as much as they can. So that’s one example. If we look at this mass global movement in many countries, unionized dock workers have stopped the ports and refused to unload Israeli cargo.

The struggle of the anti-war movement, the struggle for basic protections of not dying on the job, and yes, the individual and materialistic thing of wanting more money in your bank account so you can pay your rent, so you can buy food, so you can get the basic necessities, all comes from having a strong resourced infrastructure. And the only thing that working people have in this country right now is a union. And so that would be my answer. Why should you care about unions now? It is literally the only thing that working people have on our side. And that’s not big you union, that’s you and your coworkers coming together to push for more and to fight the boss and to hopefully win.

Maximillian Alvarez:

All right, gang, that’s going to wrap things up for us today. I want to thank our guests, Hassan Husseini of the Public Service Alliance of Canada and Labor for Palestine Canada, Tina Oh of SEIU Local two in Halifax, Canada, Alex Raymond of Teamsters Local 322 in Virginia, and Cole Rockhart’s veteran labor educator and organizer and author of the excellent new book, Fired Up About Unions, which everyone should go read. And you can learn more about the book using the links that we provided in the show notes for this episode. And of course, I want to thank you all for listening, and I want to thank you for caring about this. We do this work for you, but we cannot do it without you. Working People is brought to you in partnership with In These Times Magazine and the Real News Network. This show is produced by the great Jules Taylor and is a proud member of the Labor Radio Podcast Network.

We’ll see y’all back here next time for another episode of Working People. And in the meantime, go explore all the great work that we’re doing weekly at the Real News Network, where we do grassroots reporting that lifts up the voices and stories of people on the front lines of struggle around the US and across the world. Subscribe to our YouTube channel. Check out our great podcasts like Under the Shadow and The Marc Steiner Show, and connect with us on social media and get updates on our reporting there and help us do more work like this by going to therealnews.com/donate and becoming a supporter today. It really, really makes a difference. I’m Maximillian Alvarez. Take care of yourselves. Take care of each other. Solidarity forever.

VOLPI: EMERGENZA BOLLETTE

30 September 2026 at 20:32

⚡ EMERGENZA ENERGETICA: L’ITALIA PAGA IL CONTO 🎙 A Levante, con Margherita Furlan, Alessandro Volpi (Università di Pisa, analista di economia e finanza) lancia l’allarme su quella che rischia di diventare la vera emergenza sociale dei prossimi mesi: il costo dell’energia in Italia. 📈 Bollette fuori controllo per famiglie e imprese, un sistema industriale che perde competitività, un Paese che paga l’elettricità tra le più care d’Europa. Non è un incidente di percorso: è il risultato di scelte politiche precise. 🇷🇺 Tra queste, l’abbandono delle forniture energetiche russe a basso costo, sostituite da gas liquefatto più caro e da rotte di approvvigionamento più lunghe e più fragili. Una decisione presa a Bruxelles e a Washington, ma pagata dai cittadini e dalle piccole e medie imprese italiane. 🔍 Nella puntata: 💰 perché le bollette italiane restano più alte di quelle dei nostri concorrenti europei 🛢 chi guadagna dalla sostituzione del gas russo 🏭 l’impatto sul tessuto produttivo e sull’occupazione ⚖ il peso di oneri di sistema, speculazione finanziaria e mercato elettrico 🌍 quale margine di sovranità energetica resta all’Italia 🕕 Levante: ogni giorno, dal lunedì al venerdì, dalle 19 alle 20. Analisi e approfondimento sulla transizione internazionale in corso. 👉 ISCRIVITI al canale e attiva la campanella 🔔 per non perdere le prossime puntate. 💬 Lascia un commento: quanto è aumentata la tua bolletta nell’ultimo anno? ❤ SOSTIENI CASA DEL SOLE TV Siamo una televisione indipendente e autofinanziata: esistiamo solo grazie a chi ci sostiene. 🔹 Iscrizioni al canale (Analista Multipolare €5, Inviato della Verità €15, Architetto del Futuro €25):    / @casadelsoletvchannel   🔹 Bonifico: IBAN IT63P0326822300052392596590, intestato a La Casa del Sole Edizioni, causale “Donazione Casa del Sole TV” 📲 SEGUICI Instagram: @margheritafurlangiornalista Facebook:   / margheritafurlan555   #Levante #AlessandroVolpi #MargheritaFurlan #CasaDelSoleTV #CaroBollette #EmergenzaEnergetica #GasRusso #Energia #Economia #Geopolitica #Multipolarismo #Italia #Inflazione #SovranitàEnergetica EMERGENZA ENERGETICA: L’ITALIA PAGA IL CONTO 🎙 A Levante, con Margherita Furlan, Alessandro Volpi (Università di Pisa, analista di economia e finanza) lancia l’allarme su quella che rischia di diventare la vera emergenza sociale dei prossimi mesi: il costo dell’energia in Italia. 📈 Bollette fuori controllo per famiglie e imprese, un sistema industriale che perde competitività, un Paese che paga l’elettricità tra le più care d’Europa. Non è un incidente di percorso: è il risultato di scelte politiche precise. 🇷🇺 Tra queste, l’abbandono delle forniture energetiche russe a basso costo, sostituite da gas liquefatto più caro e da rotte di approvvigionamento più lunghe e più fragili. Una decisione presa a Bruxelles e a Washington, ma pagata dai cittadini e dalle piccole e medie imprese italiane. 🔍 Nella puntata: 💰 perché le bollette italiane restano più alte di quelle dei nostri concorrenti europei 🛢 chi guadagna dalla sostituzione del gas russo 🏭 l’impatto sul tessuto produttivo e sull’occupazione ⚖ il peso di oneri di sistema, speculazione finanziaria e mercato elettrico 🌍 quale margine di sovranità energetica resta all’Italia 🕕 Levante: ogni giorno, dal lunedì al venerdì, dalle 19 alle 20. Analisi e approfondimento sulla transizione internazionale in corso. 👉 ISCRIVITI al canale e attiva la campanella 🔔 per non perdere le prossime puntate. 💬 Lascia un commento: quanto è aumentata la tua bolletta nell’ultimo anno? ❤ SOSTIENI CASA DEL SOLE TV Siamo una televisione indipendente e autofinanziata: esistiamo solo grazie a chi ci sostiene. 🔹 Iscrizioni al canale (Analista Multipolare €5, Inviato della Verità €15, Architetto del Futuro €25):    / @casadelsoletvchannel   🔹 Bonifico: IBAN IT63P0326822300052392596590, intestato a La Casa del Sole Edizioni, causale “Donazione Casa del Sole TV” 📲 SEGUICI Instagram: @margheritafurlangiornalista Facebook:   / margheritafurlan555   #Levante #AlessandroVolpi #MargheritaFurlan #CasaDelSoleTV #CaroBollette #EmergenzaEnergetica #GasRusso #Energia #Economia #Geopolitica #Multipolarismo #Italia #Inflazione #SovranitàEnergetica

L'articolo VOLPI: EMERGENZA BOLLETTE proviene da Casa del Sole TV.

Trump Disputes Report of Proposed Sanctions Relief for Iran

30 September 2026 at 13:02

Axios (Lean Left bias) released a story Monday claiming President Donald Trump offered Iran economic relief for concrete nuclear concessions, a story the president said was "untrue."

"Hoax": Trump on Truth Social said "Axios just released a story that 'Trump' offered Sanctions Relief and Frozen Funds to Iran. This is untrue. I offered them NOTHING! Axios' story, like most others, is a HOAX, used only for purposes of satisfying their Trump Derangement Syndrome. They should withdraw this fake story, IMMEDIATELY!"  

"Trump Is Willing": The Axios report, citing unnamed US officials, said that "Trump is willing to give Iran sanctions relief and release Iranian frozen funds in return for concrete Iranian steps regarding the nuclear program." Axios, while mentioning that Trump said the reports were "untrue," added that "the offer provides a glimmer of hope for a diplomatic breakthrough after Trump rejected Iran's most recent offer."

"Fake" Axios Story: The Washington Examiner (Lean Right) highlighted the post by Trump, saying he "took to Truth Social to slam what he called a 'fake' Axios story." The article also mentioned that his post "railing" against Axios "comes as his latest sparring with White House media, following his ban on Politico, MS Now, and CNN from the White House last week."

"Trump Denies": Reuters (Center) highlighted that the Axios report did not identify the US officials providing the information.

RELATED: Gas Prices Climb, Sparking Debate Over Affordability and Policy

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

Trump Announces Plans for $15B Iowa Steel Plant

30 September 2026 at 13:02

President Trump on Monday released plans to build a new $15 billion steel plant in eastern Iowa – the largest of its kind in US history.

The Details: Mesabi Metallics, a Minnesota-based mining and steel company, said it was investing $15 billion to build the plant. Production is expected to begin in 2030 and will create an estimated 1,750 full-time jobs, according to the White House. Mesabi Metallics told CNBC (Lean Left bias) that the iron ore will come from a recently opened mine in Minnesota, and the plant would be "100% American steel: mined, melted, and poured in Minnesota and Iowa." According to the Wall Street Journal (Center), the first phase of the Iowa steel plant is estimated to produce roughly 7.5 million tons of steel per year and eventually move up to 10 million tons annually.

For Context: Trump announced 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports at the beginning of his second presidential term and recently upped it to 50%.

Ahead of Elections: Many outlets framed the announcement as coming ahead of the midterms. CNBC said the midterm election is "poised to be shaped by Americans' increasingly sour views of Trump's handling of the economy." The Wall Street Journal reported Trump was joined by several Iowa Republican candidates who face tough races, which it said put "the political angle of the event on display."

Praise from Manufacturing Companies: Fox Business (Lean Right) highlighted support for the "all-American supply chain" being created. It quoted Kevin Dempsey, the CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute, who said the US became the third-largest steel producer in the world last year and praised Trump's policies for "rebuild[ing] and strengthen[ing] our manufacturing sector." Dempsey also outlined a plan where the US would export more steel to other countries in the future. Wall Street Journal reported that while critics have blamed Trump's tariffs for an increase in steel prices, numerous steel trade groups said the tariffs have generated $47 billion in "announced and underway investment." They reportedly urged Trump not to weaken the tariffs because it would "put that progress at risk."

Trump Falls Asleep: New Republic (Left) described what it said was Trump falling asleep during the announcement. It reported that as Energy Secretary Chris Wright described the administration's industrialization agenda, "Trump's eyes shut and his head drooped forward." The outlet also said Trump "sounded truly exhausted" as he answered questions from reporters and that his responses were "quiet and short, and his speech was slurred." It wrote, "For years, Trump's entourage has boasted about the president's supposedly endless supply of energy, but over the course of his first two years back in office, the president has repeatedly exhibited bizarre conduct in the public eye." The outlet also used photos of Trump with his eyes closed compared to other outlets that used photos of him speaking and interacting with attendees.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

Did the Trump Administration Help Topple Romania's Government Earlier This Year?

30 September 2026 at 13:02

US Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle told Greek officials that the United States played a role in the collapse of the Romanian government in May, according to recent reporting from The Wall Street Journal (Center bias) and Financial Times (Center). Guilfoyle's lawyer and Romanian politicians have disputed the notion.

Key Context: In May, Romania's conservative populist and democratic socialist parties joined forces to topple the country's pro-EU government, creating political uncertainty and sinking its currency to a record low. Romania is an EU and NATO member that has deepened its military ties with the US in recent years.

WSJ Report: The Journal reported on Sept. 25 that Greek officials are "fearful of getting on [Guilfoyle's] bad side" and that on Mar. 18 she got into an argument with Greek energy minister Stavros Papastavrou. According to "a person who attended the dinner and others who were told about it," Guilfoyle told Papastavrou, referencing the Romanian collapse, "We can do that to any country we want. We can do that here." The Journal added that Guilfoyle's lawyer "disputed the characterization of the exchange."

FT Report: On Sept. 29, Financial Times referenced The Journal's reporting and said Guilfoyle "spoke about Romania in those terms," according to "a person familiar with the matter." FT juxtaposed its confirmation of Guilfoyle's comments with a following paragraph that noted the Romanian government collapsed in May. It also quoted a State Department official who said the US "values ​​the strategic partnership with Romania, which remains strong on our shared priorities, including energy security and the redistribution of defense burdens."

Zoom Out: The Journal's coverage focused on Guilfoyle's close involvement with 39-year-old American Christos Marafatsos and "persistent promotion" of Aktor, a Greek energy firm he lobbies for. It described Guilfoyle as having so far played "one of the Trump administration's most important diplomatic roles" in how she has promoted a "vertical gas corridor" designed to carry US liquefied natural gas from Greece, through Central and Eastern Europe to Ukraine. In late February, the US Department of Energy hosted officials from Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, and the European Commission to discuss the project.

Romania Meeting: On March 31 in Romania, Guilfoyle met with leaders of the democratic socialist Social Democratic Party (PSD). A video has surfaced online that appears to show the meeting. Financial Times mentioned the meeting in its coverage, though The Journal did not. On Apr. 20, PSD withdrew from Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan's governing coalition. From there, PSD teamed up with the conservative populist Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR) to topple the current government, sending Romania into a political crisis. Since The Journal's report made headlines across Romanian media, PSD's leader has called the idea that his party collaborated with Washington to topple his government a conspiracy theory and "right-wing propaganda." PSD did confirm that the meeting focused on the vertical gas corridor, however. Bolojan's government supported the corridor, though it reportedly refused a 20-year deal that would have locked in LNG purchases at a rate it deemed unfavorable.

RELATED: Romanian Left and Right Team Up to Topple Pro-EU Government After 10 Months in Power | AllSides

How The Media Covered It: The story was not widely covered by Western English-language outlets. In addition to WSJ and FT, AllSides found coverage from Mediaite (Lean Left) and The Nation (Left). An opinion by Jeet Heer for The Nation described Guilfoyle as a "master of mafia diplomacy" who "has too long been treated merely as a shadow of the men in her life – but [is] actually a formidable villain in her own right." Mediaite focused on Marafatsos and the vertical gas corridor, and didn't mention Guilfoyle's alleged comments about toppling governments. Anne Applebaum (Center) of The Atlantic (Left) described Guilfoyle's comments as an "amazing detail" in The Journal's reporting.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

Is Digital Technology Making Us Lonely?

30 September 2026 at 13:02

Digital technology has increased access to information and convenience, but is it contributing to loneliness and poor mental health? Media on the left, right, and center have explored how digital technologies might be contributing to loneliness and disconnect amongst teens and adults.

The Cost of Community: Julie Beck, writing for The Atlantic (Left bias), highlighted the maxim, "Inconvenience is the cost of community," which has been repeated frequently on social media recently. Beck argued that sometimes the reason technology or innovation is even considered "convenient" is specifically because it "allows you to do something in isolation," such as self-checkout at the grocery store or conversationless trips on rideshare apps. However, Beck suggested that sometimes conveniences—such as avoiding small talk with strangers in rideshares or staying in to order delivery rather than socializing with friends—are actually a detriment to people as individuals as well as the society they're a part of.

Harm to Physical and Mental Health: Though many writers have highlighted the negative impact digital technologies and social media can have on mental health, The Times (Center) reported that teens are seeing an impact on physical health largely associated with increasing screen time. The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), a think tank based in the United Kingdom, found that 37 percent of teens "hardly ever" left their bedrooms during free time. The Times wrote that "the retreat into bedrooms has coincided with a collapse in physical activity and an escalating crisis in adolescent health," citing a significant increase in teenage obesity rates and teens who participate in no physical activity inside or outside school. A senior researcher at CSJ said, "Restricting harmful social media is part of the answer. But taking away the screen without offering anything in its place will not work. We must rebuild real-world alternatives to time spent online."

A Loneliness Epidemic: Blaze Media (Right) cited former surgeon general Vivek Murthy's warning that "loneliness and social isolation increase the risk for premature death by 26% and 29% respectively" and argued that the connections that can be built online do not satisfy humans' "deep need for two-way connection." Blaze also highlighted comments from conservative podcaster Glenn Beck (Right) who talked about the sometimes unhealthy "parasocial" relationships fans can have towards celebrities or internet personalities. Beck said that even though listeners feel familiar with him or other people they listen to or interact with online, these kinds of relationships can be dangerous because "it satisfies the hunger without feeding you."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

ICE Officers Report Orders to Minimize Arrests, DHS Denies

29 September 2026 at 13:02

Anonymous Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers reportedly said they were told to stop arresting unauthorized immigrants who don't have additional criminal charges. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) denied the reports on Saturday.

The Initial Report: The Daily Wire (Right bias) exclusive cited "agency sources" who spoke to the outlet "on the condition of anonymity." The sources reportedly said migrants will not be arrested if they have final deportation orders but no criminal convictions or charges. They also said "collateral arrests" will cease under the DHS directive. The Wire reported, "Several ICE officers expressed frustration with the seemingly sudden change, and one suggested it may be an attempt to gain public favor before the midterms." Additionally, it stated, "One ICE source cast doubt on whether agency leadership told [President Donald] Trump before calling off non-criminal arrests."

DHS Denial: "This is false. No one is off the table," DHS responded on X on Saturday. "We will continue to arrest any and all illegal aliens that come into our path. Anyone in our country illegally will be arrested and deported. In an effort to protect American citizens, ICE has initiated a nationwide public safety surge in sanctuary cities where our brave officers will be targeting criminal illegal aliens—many released from jails by sanctuary politicians—including murderers, rapists, child predators, and gang members."

How The Media Covered It: The Wire noted DHS' denial in its report but led with the ICE sources' claims. Newsweek (Center) and The Mirror - US (Left) led with the denial instead. All three outlets, however, highlighted the decrease in Trump's approval rating on immigration amid controversial ICE altercations – to 43% from 48% last summer, according to Fox News (Right). The Wire said public opinion is "sour[ing]" on Trump's immigration agenda, and Newsweek said it's "fallen sharply in recent months." The Mirror furthered that it "appears to be changing at a critical point in Trump's term."

RELATED: Tracking Trump's Campaign Promises on Citizenship and Deportations | AllSides

Newsweek stated that the new directive, if accurate, "would likely spark an angry reaction from a section of Trump's political base" but gave voice to Fox News congressional correspondent Bill Melugin, who concluded that the conflicting reports reflected a "miscommunication."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

🔴11/9 SI REPLICA | LEVANTE LIVE

30 September 2026 at 19:33

🔴11 settembre, va in onda la replica | LIVE LEVANTE

🔴 A Levante questa sera, mercoledì 30 settembre 2026, alle 19, Margherita Furlan dialoga con Fabio Massimo Parenti, studioso di economia politica internazionale e dei rapporti tra Cina e Occidente, e Alessandro Volpi, storico dell’economia all’Università di Pisa.

✈ Un volo flydubai partito da Dubai e diretto a Tel Aviv precipita di oltre quattromila metri in mezzo minuto, inverte la rotta e atterra a Tabuk, in Arabia Saudita, con 166 israeliani a bordo. La compagnia parla di un alterco nella cabina di pilotaggio. Nel giro di poche ore il governo israeliano parla di attacco jihadista, di «un altro 11 settembre» e di una pista iraniana. Nessuna indagine è conclusa.

🧨 Quattro giorni fa Trump ha respinto il piano iraniano per riaprire Hormuz in sette giorni. Secondo il Wall Street Journal si aspetta di riprendere i bombardamenti dopo le elezioni del 3 novembre. Una settimana fa ha ricevuto Xi Jinping alla Casa Bianca. Le guerre hanno bisogno di un racconto fondativo: stasera proviamo a smontare il montaggio, tenendo fermi i fatti.

🧭 Affrontiamo insieme:
🛫 Due versioni di un volo: che cosa sappiamo davvero e che cosa ci viene già raccontato come certo
🇸🇦 Il silenzio di Riad, gli Accordi di Abramo e il corridoio d’affari tra Israele e il Golfo
🇨🇳 Xi a Washington, il tavolo dell’Oman e il no di Trump al piano iraniano
⛽ Chi incassa una guerra sospesa fino alle elezioni, dal Brent al gasolio americano che l’Europa rischia di pagare
🇮🇹 Un’Italia assente da tutti i tavoli, tra Washington, Pechino e Muscat
📅 Che cosa guardare da qui al 3 novembre

📚 LIBRI DEGLI OSPITI

✍ Fabio Massimo Parenti, La Cina non si USA. Due mondi a confronto, Dedalo, 2026.
✍ Fabio Massimo Parenti, La via cinese. Sfida per un futuro condiviso.

✍ Alessandro Volpi, La guerra della finanza. Trump e la fine del capitalismo globale, Laterza, 2025.
✍ Alessandro Volpi, I padroni del mondo, Laterza, 2024.
✍ Alessandro Volpi, Prezzi alle stelle, Laterza, 2023.

🎯 SOSTIENI CASA DEL SOLE TV
Casa del Sole TV è un progetto di giornalismo indipendente autofinanziato. Esiste perché esistete voi. 🙏

💳 Per donazioni:
IBAN: IT63P0326822300052392596590
Intestato a: La Casa del Sole Edizioni
Causale: Donazione Casa del Sole TV

⭐ Membership YouTube:
👉 https://www.youtube.com/@CasadelSoleTVChannel
🔹 Analista Multipolare €5/mese
🔸 Inviato della Verità €15/mese
🔶 Architetto del Futuro €25/mese

📖 I LIBRI DI MARGHERITA FURLAN
♟ BRICS Scacco Matto (disponibile in italiano, inglese, russo)

🌐 SEGUI CASA DEL SOLE TV
▶ YouTube: @CasadelSoleTVChannel

🔔 Iscrivetevi, attivate la campanella, sostenete Casa del Sole TV. È grazie a voi che siamo qui ogni sera.

#Levante #CasadelSoleTV #MargheritaFurlan #Geopolitica #Multipolarismo #FlyDubai #Israele #Iran #Hormuz #Cina #XiJinping #Trump #GuerraCognitiva #FabioMassimoParenti #AlessandroVolpi

L'articolo 🔴11/9 SI REPLICA | LEVANTE LIVE proviene da Casa del Sole TV.

NATO chief says ‘no imminent danger’ but rearmament of Europe continues in full swing

30 September 2026 at 18:28

More rearmament talks are underway in Brussels as European politicians continue building an increasingly tense anti-Russian discourse. On Wednesday, September 30, defense ministers and industry representatives joined the Euronews Defense and Space Summit, focusing on the bloc’s growing defense expenditure and member cooperation.

The summit took place after weeks of allegations of hybrid attacks on EU members, which pushed the already tense rearmament narrative permeating the European political establishment up a couple more notches. It also followed, by only a couple of days, the Council of the EU’s announcement of the next phase of five European Defense Projects of Common Interest (EDPCIs) – projects that “allow EU countries to work together on major defense initiatives that are too large or too complex for individual countries to develop on their own.”

Read more: “Militarization of rules and minds” in Europe threatens workers and welfare

While separate, the two events shared several points in common, starting with a focus on increasing coordination between EU countries to arm more efficiently – and spend the billions of euros planned for defense over the coming years. They also emphasized sections of the military sector to receive the most attention – including drones and military capacities in Eastern Europe. 

This geographical focus goes beyond EU members, expanding to – at least – Ukraine and Moldova. Most EDPCIs – like the Drone and Counter-Drone European Resolve (DECODER) and the Eastern Flank Watch – list Ukraine as a partner. Ukrainian arms entrepreneurs were also present at the summit in Brussels, including leading figures from Fire Point, one of the country’s most prominent arms companies.

Very imminent investments into arms

While NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated in his summit intervention that there is “no imminent danger” to the alliance members’ territories, he and others did not hold back in offering anticipations of an unstable period.

Belgian Minister of Defense Theo Francken, for one, anticipated “more hybrid threat actions” and an overall “dark winter for Europe” – a scenario he seems to want to address by spending more on arms and cutting social services, as he has explicitly stated on numerous occasions.

“Europe has been very good in investing in soft power, in social security,” Francken said. “And it’s beautiful to have a pension system, to have social welfare systems when someone gets sick, when somebody loses his job – we have everything. But when there’s a war or there’s hybrid threats, we don’t have anything.”

Considering the significant amount of money European countries have already invested into armament, his assessment that “we don’t have anything” is inaccurate at best. 

It also remains contested on a regular basis on the streets of many European cities, where trade unions, students, and peace movements continue to protest against austerity budgets that aim to provide for war.

Europe needs a policy that builds security with its neighbors

In addition to large-scale demonstrations against social security and labor cuts in France’s proposed 2027 budget and student strikes against conscription in Germany last week, mobilizations are expected to grow over the coming months – including an international youth strike in November.

“We reject the militarization of our societies and support the young people who are refusing it,” the Stop ReArm Europe coalition wrote on September 23. “Thousands of high school students and university students across Europe are rising up to refuse militarization and the return of conscription.”

Read more: German students say ‘we don’t want to go to war’

“Nearly 20 million children in the EU – one in four – live at risk of poverty or social exclusion,” the group added. “Meanwhile, governments have committed to military spending that the EU’s own Defense Commissioner, Andrius Kubilius, puts at €7 trillion by 2035.”

“The trillions earmarked for militarized security will leave us staring down the barrel of a gun and indebted to global financiers,” Stop ReArm wrote, calling for a solidarity- and care-based alternative. “This must go hand in hand with a non-aligned foreign policy that resolves conflicts through diplomacy, upholds international law and human rights, and builds common security for all: security with our neighbors, not against them.”

NFL threatened to ban player from game for honoring slain Palestinian girl

30 September 2026 at 16:25
Azeez al-Shaair #0 of the Houston Texans warms up prior to the game against the Cincinnati Bengals at NRG Stadium on September 20, 2026 in Houston, Texas. Photo by Kenneth Richmond/Getty Images

This article was originally published by Truthout on Sept. 29, 2026. It is shared here under a  Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.

An NFL official reportedly threatened to remove Houston Texans linebacker Azeez Al-Shaair from his game earlier this month unless he removed his memorial for an 8-year-old Palestinian girl killed by Israel in Gaza.

During the Texans’s week two game against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 20, Al-Shaair wrote the name of Wafaa Akila on his eye black, which refers to the strip or paint streaks that many football players wear on their cheeks.

Wafaa was an 8-year-old girl who was killed, along with her father, in an Israeli airstrike on a vehicle in Gaza City on September 6. She and her father were on their way home from her first day of school, according to Al Jazeera.

Al-Shaair, who is rated as one of the top linebackers in the league, was reportedly told by an NFL official that he would have to remove his eye black or else be barred from playing in the game, an anonymous NFL source told The Athletic. Al-Shaair complied, the reports said. Fox News’s sports vertical also confirmed the league’s threat.

The linebacker’s latest tribute came just days after the NFL gave him an $11,941 fine for writing Hind Rajab’s name on his eye black during the Texans game against the Buffalo Bills on September 13. In a show of solidarity, Dallas Mavericks player Kyrie Irving said in a post on social media that he would “take care of his fine.”

“It’s bigger to me. What’s a life worth? Is a life worth $11,000? I think it’s priceless,” said Al-Shaair when asked about the penalty.

“You can’t get so lost in your own problems that you can’t have compassion for other people in the world,” he went on. “We don’t have to have all the answers to everything to know that an innocent man, an innocent woman, an innocent child losing her life is not right … whether they’re here in America or somewhere halfway across the world.”

Ahead of the Texans game against the Indianapolis Colts this past Sunday, Al-Shaair once again wore the names of children killed by Israel — Lana and Bana Ahmed, two sisters who Israel killed along with their family in an airstrike earlier this month. The sisters were 12 and 8 years old.

The NFL gave Al-Shaair a similar fine in January when he wrote “stop the genocide” on his eye black during the pregame, but took it off for the actual game. At the time, he said that he was similarly told that he would be banned from playing in the game if he kept the message on.

“At the end of the day, it’s bigger than me. When things that are going on makes people uncomfortable — imagine how those people feel. I think that’s the biggest thing. I have no affiliation, no connection to these people other than the fact that I’m a human being,” Al-Shaair told reporters after that fine. “Even when I’m walking off this field, that’s the type of stuff that goes through my head, that I have to check myself — when I’m sitting here crying about football, when there’s people dying every single day.”

He was told that he violated league rules about displaying non-approved personal messages — but he pointed out that other players have written messages on their eye black without a fine.

“They always fine you, but I was told if I wore that in the game, I would be pulled out of the game,” he said. “I understood it was a fine, but I ain’t never seen Stef get pulled out of the game for having eye tape with writing on it.” Al-Shaair was referring to New England Patriots receiver Stefon Diggs, who frequently writes messages honoring his Christian faith on his face tape.

Démolir la maison où ils vivent, sous astreinte de 300 euros par jour de retard

30 September 2026 at 16:20

Une cour d'appel a ordonné la destruction d'une maison habitée, construite sous des permis annulés ensuite, pour la perte d'ensoleillement d'un voisin. Le 17 septembre 2026, la Cour de cassation a cassé partiellement cette décision. La démolition n'est pas annulée, mais elle est remise en cause.

Démolir la maison où ils vivent, sous astreinte de 300 euros par jour de retard
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !
Démolir la maison où ils vivent, sous astreinte de 300 euros par jour de retard

LA NEWSLETTER · GRATUITE

Le Courrier,
chaque matin.

L'essentiel de l'actualité, passé au crible par les cinq plumes du Courrier. Dans votre boîte, chaque jour ouvré.

Gratuit. Vous restez libre de partir quand vous voulez.

JE M'INSCRIS lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

La réparation d’un trouble de voisinage peut-elle conduire à raser le toit sous lequel vit une famille ? La question, longtemps abordée principalement sous l’angle de la réparation intégrale, vient de recevoir un sérieux correctif judiciaire.

Démolir la maison où ils vivent, sous astreinte de 300 euros par jour de retard
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

ABONNEMENT

Allez au fond
des choses.

Deux grands formats par jour. Les cinq plumes du Courrier. La série Sécession, le dimanche.

Le monde commente. Vous, vous comprenez.

S'ABONNER lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

Une démolition ordonnée sous 300 euros d’astreinte par jour

Dans cette affaire, un couple avait fait construire sa maison d’habitation sur la base de permis de construire ultérieurement annulés. Des voisins ont ensuite engagé une action pour trouble anormal du voisinage, invoquant notamment une perte d’ensoleillement et une atteinte à leurs vues.

L’URSSAF redressait à la règle de trois : la Cour de cassation annule tout
L’URSSAF exige des entreprises une comptabilité au centime près, mais elle de son côté, se permet l’approximation. Dans un arrêt du 3 septembre 2026, la Cour de cassation annule purement et simplement des redressements fondés sur un ratio inventé par les inspecteurs et sur un taux unique de

Le 8 octobre 2024, la cour d’appel de Versailles avait ordonné la démolition de la maison, aux frais du couple, dans un délai de deux mois. Chaque jour de retard coûte 300 euros pendant douze mois, soit plus de 100 000 euros au total.

Le fondement invoqué est la réparation intégrale du préjudice. Ce principe conduit à raser un domicile. Mais cette logique pouvait conduire à une situation particulièrement difficile: un logement familial détruit pour réparer une nuisance de voisinage avec des conséquences humaines.

Démolir la maison où ils vivent, sous astreinte de 300 euros par jour de retard
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TELEGRAM · L'INFO EN CONTINU

Entre deux éditions,
le fil.

La newsletter vous donne le matin. Le fil vous donne l'instant.

Gratuit, et en continu.

REJOINDRE LE FIL t.me/resterlibre
t.me/resterlibre
Restez libre !

La Cour de cassation remet le domicile dans la balance

L’arrêt de la troisième chambre civile du 17 septembre 2026, pourvoi n° E 25-10.224, a cassé partiellement l’arrêt. Elle reproche à la cour d’appel de ne pas avoir recherché si la démolition portait une atteinte disproportionnée au droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale et du domicile, garanti par garanti par l’article 8 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales.

Crise de la dette française ? Mais non, arrêtez de vous faire peur ! (même si elle serait salutaire)
Il n’y aura pas de crise de la dette française. Il y aura une dégradation lente : ce qu’elle coûte à l’épargnant, et ce que changerait une élection de Mélenchon.

Le raisonnement ne supprime donc pas la possibilité d’une démolition. Il impose au juge de mettre en balance plusieurs éléments : la réalité et l’importance du préjudice subi par les voisins, les conséquences de la destruction pour la famille et surtout l’existence de solutions alternatives permettant de faire cesser le trouble. L’affaire retourne ainsi devant la cour d’appel de Versailles. La démolition n’est pas annulée définitivement : elle est remise en cause et devra être réexaminée.

L’enjeu dépasse ce seul conflit immobilier. D’un côté, le voisin victime doit pouvoir obtenir une réparation effective. De l’autre, la puissance de la décision judiciaire ne peut ignorer qu’une maison est aussi un domicile, avec une valeur familiale et patrimoniale qui ne se résume pas au coût d’une construction.

La Cour de cassation introduit ainsi une exigence de proportionnalité là où l’application mécanique de la réparation intégrale pouvait produire une conséquence radicale : détruire un logement pour faire disparaître une nuisance. La prochaine décision dira si cette maison doit finalement être démolie, adaptée ou conservée sous d’autres conditions.

Démolir la maison où ils vivent, sous astreinte de 300 euros par jour de retard
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TIPS · SANS ABONNEMENT

Offrez-nous
un café.

Un média libre vit de ses lecteurs. Un pourboire ponctuel, sans compte ni engagement, quand le cœur vous en dit.

Vous donnez ce que vous voulez. Vous restez libre.

LAISSER UN POURBOIRE merci !
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

‘Neo-communist tactics’ – Former PM Viktor Orbán warns of wave of political repression after arrest of his former minister

30 September 2026 at 15:36

The former prime minister of Hungary, Viktor Orbán, has denounced a new political offensive against his Fidesz political formation following the arrest and 30-day pretrial detention for Miklós Seszták, a lawmaker and former national development minister under Orbán.

A Budapest court on Wednesday ordered 30 days of pre-trial detention for Seszták following a corruption investigation that may just be beginning of a wave of prosecutions targeting the former Orbán government.

Orbán accused Magyar’s Tisza government of “neo-communist tactics.”

“The Tisza authoritarian rulers are raising taxes, fuel prices are soaring, and they are wrecking the Hungarian economy. Authoritarianism creates new victims every day. Today it’s them, tomorrow it’s you. They would rather stage political theatre than face reality. Our message to every Hungarian is this: the Tisza authoritarian rulers will not break our patriotic community. We will not let them. They cannot imprison half the country,” he continued.

Neo-communist tactics. The Tisza authoritarian rulers are raising taxes, fuel prices are soaring, and they are wrecking the Hungarian economy. Authoritarianism creates new victims every day. Today it’s them, tomorrow it’s you. They would rather stage political theatre than face reality. Our message to every Hungarian is this: the Tisza authoritarian rulers will not break our patriotic community. We will not let them. They cannot imprison half the country.

— Orbán Viktor (@PM_ViktorOrban) September 28, 2026

An investigating judge at the Buda Central District Court found sufficient grounds to suspect official bribery and other offenses and said detention was needed to protect the inquiry, the Budapest Metropolitan Court announced. The ruling is not final. Seszták’s lawyer filed an appeal, and the former minister has maintained his innocence.

The order came two days after parliament voted 139-0 to lift the immunity of Seszták and another Orbán-era minister, Balázs Hankó. Fidesz and its Christian Democratic People’s Party allies boycotted the session and called the proceedings political persecution.

Prosecutors and the newly created National Asset Recovery and Protection Office allege that between 2014 and 2018, Seszták accepted bribes totaling hundreds of millions to more than 11 billion forints (€30 million) from construction contractors tied to state bus company Volánbusz and other projects, together with a former state asset-management official. Seszták has called the accusations baseless.

Balázs Orbán, the former prime minister’s political director, compared the events to 1950s political prosecutions and to cases against conservative politicians in Poland.

“This is the political arbitrariness of the communist 1950s, unfolding in Hungary in real time. You can watch it live on @PM_ViktorOrban’s Facebook page: a former Hungarian minister is being arrested following a direct and public demand by Péter Magyar, the Hungarian Prime Minister backed by Brussels,” he wrote.

This is the political arbitrariness of the communist 1950s, unfolding in Hungary in real time. You can watch it live on @PM_ViktorOrban’s Facebook page: a former Hungarian minister is being arrested following a direct and public demand by Péter Magyar, the Hungarian Prime Minister backed by Brussels.

— Balázs Orbán (@BalazsOrban_HU) September 28, 2026

Magyar’s government rejected the accusations. Officials are attempting to present the probes as an effort to examine alleged corruption from Orbán’s 16 years in power. Magyar noted that a former minister had been placed in pretrial detention for the first time since 1990.

“This is the first time since 1990 that a former minister has been arrested. He is suspected of bribery,” wrote Magyar.

The court has placed @PM_ViktorOrban's former minister and current member of Parliament, Miklós Seszták, in pre-trial detention. This is the first time since 1990 that a former minister has been arrested. He is suspected of bribery involving 12 billion forints.

— Magyar Péter (Ne féljetek) (@magyarpeterMP) September 30, 2026

Fidesz vice president and MEP Kinga Gál called Sept. 28 “a dark day for Hungarian democracy” and accused Magyar of turning police and prosecutors against political rivals.

A dark day for Hungarian democracy. In another chapter in the political witch hunt against right-wing politicians, the Tisza majority in the Hungarian Parliament stripped MPs and former ministers Balázs Hankó and Miklós Seszták of their immunity.Balázs Hankó is the target of a politically fabricated case. We never thought we would see such times return to Hungary. Shameful. The Hungarian PM is pressuring police and prosecutors while building a new political police force to pursue his political opponents. He is trying to silence the opposition and dismantle the rule of law. We condemn it in the strongest terms.

— Kinga Gál (@_KingaGal) September 28, 2026

MEP András László said the cases are based on the “political instructions” from the prime minister.

The era of political show trials are back!  Today the authoritarian rule in Hungary reached a new low. The judiciary is acting on the PM's personal instructions.

— András LÁSZLÓ MEP 🇭🇺 (@laszloan) September 28, 2026

Seszták was taken into custody Monday after walking into the Central Investigative Prosecutor’s Office, saying he intended to give a statement. The new Asset Recovery Office, which began operations Sept. 27, took over the case. His lawyer has argued that parts of the detention process were irregular.

Neither Seszták nor Hankó has been convicted, and both deny wrongdoing.

–

The post ‘Neo-communist tactics’ – Former PM Viktor Orbán warns of wave of political repression after arrest of his former minister appeared first on Remix News.

Europe’s housing crisis is an immigration crisis, as Berlin data confirms

30 September 2026 at 13:43

Across the West, native Europeans are dying out but rental prices continue to go up every year. While the left would like to point the finger at capitalists and greedy landlords, the primary factor driving the housing affordability crisis is mass immigration.

Berlin is a prime example of this trend, as German journalist and author Jens Winter pointed out on X using clear population and housing data.

“Rental prices on the market have more than doubled in Berlin since 2011—plenty of money for corporations. But where is the increased demand coming from? While the native population of the capital has declined by 260,000 since 2011, the number of foreigners and people with a migration background has risen by 650,000 over the same period. That means: Without migration, there would be less demand for housing in Berlin today than in 2011,” he wrote.

In a follow-up post, he wrote that the German “conservative” party is just as guilty as the left.

“The CDU-aligned real estate lobby is raking in big money with migration in Berlin. The Germans have a choice: dying out in the CDU’s multikulti capitalism or in the Left’s multikulti socialism. Understandable response: If we’re going to disappear anyway, why bust our asses for it?” he wrote.

Die CDU-nahe Immobilien-Lobby scheffelt mit Migration in Berlin mächtig Geld. Die Deutschen haben die Wahl: Aussterben im Multikulti-Kapitalismus der CDU oder im Multikulti-Sozialismus der Linken. Verständliche Antwort: Wenn schon verschwinden, warum dafür dann hart arbeiten? https://t.co/GPrTp62SXO

— Jens Winter (@mr_jenswinter) September 26, 2026

While the doubling of rents is real, there is a basic supply and demand reality that the left would like to deny. It is indeed true that predatory property owners, major institutional players, and money printing have played contributing roles to the housing crisis, but no matter how many greedy property owners are involved, if the population of a city falls, rental and housing prices are almost inevitably going to fall.

Mass immigration means that population numbers never fall. Any breathing space for German families to repopulate, have more children, and fill in the gaps left by older generations passing away is immediately filled by hundreds of thousands of foreigners.

The data shows that the population of native Germans fell by 260,000 people. In a system that rejects mass immigration and foreign real estate investors, this could have been a boon for birthrates and increasing home ownership. For one, Germans who already lived in Berlin, and those looking to move to Berlin, would have been more easily able to afford rents and housing due to less competition on the housing market. Secondly, more native Germans would have had a chance to start families — and those who already had families could have afforded an extra child or two — by securing affordable housing.

However, Germany does not reject mass immigration.

Instead, 650,000 foreigners arrived in the same period of time and housing and rental prices soared. The left, however, refuses to do simple math.

There is of course another solution, but it is far more complicated than simply allowing population levels to fall in a country that has never had so many people living in it. Instead of ending mass immigration, left-wing parties, along with the CDU, demand more housing is built.

However, there are myriad reasons why the required housing is not being built, including high construction and material costs, red tape, zoning, and a lack of skilled workers. The same parties have been making the same demands for years now, but construction cannot keep pace with demand in Berlin or other major cities across Germany.

The Left Party may promise to build more, but the reality is that it will not happen. Nothing the left offers will lead to the necessary building. Before Olaf Scholz of the far-left Social Democrats (SPD) won the chancellorship, he promised that his “goal” was to create 400,000 new apartments per year, which would include 100,000 units of social housing, saying, “That’s not witchcraft, we just have to want to do it.” 

It never happened under Scholz and it won’t happen under a left-wing government in Berlin either.

Should more housing even be built?

As Western cities race to replace their native European populations, the question becomes whether life really becomes better in a crowded multicultural city when it means more traffic, longer waiting times at hospitals, crowded classrooms, and imported crime — just to name a few ills.

The newcomers also did not fix the skilled worker shortage that could potentially build all the homes and apartments politicians and lobbyists claim Europe needs. While a certain number of new houses and apartments always need to be built, the question then becomes should Western civilization really be involved in endless building to accommodate millions of foreigners.

On top of all of these questions, the buildings developers managed to build are now in fact uglier than ever, more expensive than ever, and are built more slowly than ever.

In fact, data shows that the time from start to completion for a project is longer than it has been in decades. Again, where are all these young migrants from Africa and the Middle East to fuel a new construction boom with their master artisan and building skills?

The reality is they largely do not exist. Many skilled builders who are immigrants are from neighboring European countries, such as Poland, and they increasingly see fewer reasons to work in Germany.

The pro-migration left is making housing worse

Winter’s X post is especially relevant given that the Left Party recently won a first place finish in Berlin elections, securing over 25 percent of the vote. Commentators and analysts have contributed the rise of the party in Germany’s capital due a variety of factors, but two major components are the party’s ability to secure the vote of German citizens with a migration background and young voters.

The second factor is Berlin’s housing crisis, which helped drive support from groups like non-voters, the young, and foreigners.

German taxpayer-funded Deutsche Welle, wrote: “That makes sense to 17-year-old Liska, who voted for the socialists: ‘The Left Party did appeal to me, especially because of the social issues — getting prices down, making rents more affordable.’ Rents in Berlin are indeed rising at a massive pace — by some 7% in the last two years alone — and first-time tenants are likely to be the hardest hit. Polls also showed that by far the biggest proportion of Berlin voters — 37% — thought that the Left Party was the most likely to create affordable housing.”

The Left Party and various other left-wing parties have convinced young people that there are easy fixes to the housing crisis. The problem is not relegated to Berlin, as all of Germany has seen tight vacancies as more and more migrants arrive, as Remix News previously reported.

In the end, the left and its voters are choosing a path where more and more building only leads to overcrowding and environmental degradation.

Mass immigration and higher housing costs hurt birthrates

Numerous studies have shown that immigration has helped drive soaring rental and housing prices across the Western world — not just in Germany. In turn, studies have also shown that soaring housing prices have depressed birthrates, including in countries like the Netherlands, according to the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI).

Again, the same story is taking place in the Netherlands, with the natural population increase for the Dutch at near zero or negative. Nevertheless, the population rose from about 16.8 million in 2013 to 18.1 million in 2025, with net migration accounting for virtually all of the recent increase.

It must also be remembered that just like in Germany, most of these migrants want to head to the major cities, such as Amsterdam.

Official housing-need forecasts in the Netherlands also attribute a large share of future extra demand, often 45 percent or more of the extra dwellings required, to population growth that is itself 95 percent migration-driven.

Great for landlords, bad for the citizens.

Of course, the Alternative for Germany has tried to tie the housing crisis to mass immigration, and they have successfully made this case to some extent.

WATCH: 🇩🇪🇪🇺 Mass immigration is fueling the West's housing crisis.

Here's how it's happening in Germany.

In a powerful speech in the German Bundestag, @AfD politician Carolin Bachmann slams the ruling government for allowing 2 million migrants into the country while families… pic.twitter.com/DMEqiV316S

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) February 15, 2024

The problem is that as more and more of the population becomes foreign, this argument holds less and less sway. Immigration may raise housing prices but if immigration brought a person to a country in the first place, and if more immigration might also enable more and more of their family members and fellow countrymen to arrive, then these voters have every incentive to keep immigration levels high regardless of housing costs.

Many of these migrants are not paying for rent anyway. There are millions of foreigners on social welfare, which means not only are they taking housing places of native Germans, but they are being paid to do it. They then often have far higher birthrates than native Germans, even with limited space, which entitles them to larger spaces.

The cycle is self-reinforcing and relentless. That means unless dramatic action is taken against mass immigration, housing and rental prices may never truly come down.

The post Europe’s housing crisis is an immigration crisis, as Berlin data confirms appeared first on Remix News.

‘This violence is unspeakable’ – Hundreds arrested as student protests rage in France, school staff hunted by students

30 September 2026 at 11:39

French police detained 440 people, most of them minors, on Tuesday as high school blockades that began last week around Paris spread nationwide and, in several cities, gave way to clashes, arson and vandalism.

Images and videos of the violence rapidly spread on social media, including harrowing videos of teachers and staff being hunted by students. One video of a school staff member from the Stéphane Hessel High School, who was attacked while trying to extinguish a dumpster fire.

🇫🇷🔴 JUST IN: A White male staff member at Stéphane Hessel High School is viciously attacked while trying to extinguish a dumpster fire.

The violent blockades at French schools coincide with nationwide public-sector union strikes that are paralyzing the country.

Police are now… pic.twitter.com/BAcX4aZkyO

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) September 29, 2026

In another video, a chemistry teacher was kicked and chased by rioters outside the César Baggio high school.

In another video, a chemistry teacher was kicked in his back and chased through the streets of Lille.

🇫🇷🔥 France in chaos: Youths are literally hunting teachers and school staff in packs.

A chemistry teacher was violently attacked and kicked in his back as rioters chase him at the César Baggio high school in Lille, France.

Nationwide protests and school blockades have led to… pic.twitter.com/OOfIkdeLk2

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) September 30, 2026

Other videos showed burning barricades and large crowds of students, a pattern seen at schools across the country.

Nouveau blocus ce matin au lycée Paul Eluard à Saint-Denis.

Un feu est allumé devant l'entrée du lycée.#greve29septembre #29septembre pic.twitter.com/N2UmVMkX7O

— Luc Auffret (@LucAuffret) September 29, 2026

Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez told BFMTV that about two-thirds of those detained were placed in police custody, mainly on suspicion of property damage or assaulting officers.

Forty-eight members of the security forces were injured, he said. “Violence is never legitimate. There is nothing that justifies violence,” Nuñez added, describing the police response as “extremely proportionate.”

Education Minister Édouard Geffray said at least 10 school employees were hurt and that the Education Ministry had counted 31 injured students and staff in all. Among the cases he cited were a teacher beaten in northern France, a principal struck by a firework mortar in Hauts-de-Seine, west of Paris, and another principal in Essonne who received a death threat.

“Legal proceedings have been initiated against these actions. This violence is unspeakable,” Geffray wrote on X.

Aujourd’hui, au moins 10 personnels de l’Éducation nationale et plusieurs élèves ont été blessés, notamment par des tirs de mortier.

Les premiers sont des fonctionnaires, qui servent l'intérêt général et le service public. Les seconds sont des élèves que nous avons tous les…

— Édouard Geffray (@EdouardGeffray) September 29, 2026

He said the right to demonstrate “cannot serve as an excuse for such actions” and warned that anyone who “legitimizes them or calls for the expansion of the blockades in this context puts our students and public sector employees in danger.”

The ministry stated that protests or disruptions affected 416 schools during the day — out of about 3,700 lycées nationwide. By evening, 338 sites were still affected, including 45 fully blocked and 46 facing attempted blockades.

The main high school union, the Union Syndicale Lycéenne, put the number of blockaded schools far higher, at about 400, and called students to join a nationwide public-sector strike already planned for Tuesday.

Arrivée de la manifestation sur la Place de la Nation à Paris.

Les chiffres de la mobilisation :
– 70 000 manifestants selon la CGT
– 30 000 manifestants dont 8 000 pompiers d'après la préfecture#greve29septembre #29septembre #pompiers pic.twitter.com/ieDQbhAPkT

— Luc Auffret (@LucAuffret) September 29, 2026

The movement started last week in the Paris suburbs, with students citing teacher shortages, overcrowded classes, poorly maintained buildings, and sweltering classrooms during this year’s heat waves. On Monday, authorities reported 164 detentions and disruptions at 180 schools. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu called any further escalation “irresponsible,” while saying “the difficulties of high schools must be heard and addressed.”

Scenes in several cities went well beyond sit-ins. In Lille, masked youths set trash bins and bicycles alight outside Lycée César Baggio, smashed bus shelters and pulled down a traffic signal as police fired tear gas. Similar confrontations were reported in Nantes, where students stacked bins across the gates of Lycée Gabriel Guist’hau, and at Lycée Arago in Paris, where a small group faced a police line.

Officials said hydrochloric acid was thrown at officers in seven incidents.

Tuesday’s school unrest coincided with a one-day strike by civil servants, including teachers, firefighters and hospital staff, two days before Lecornu is due to present the draft 2027 budget.

Unions said they were fighting a proposed freeze in the public-sector pay index, the fourth in a row, and a broader €54 billion ($63 billion) savings plan as France’s debt and deficit remain under pressure.

Unions claimed hundreds of thousands marched nationwide against the pay freeze.

Education Minister Geffray has accused lawmakers from the hard-left France Unbowed party of encouraging students to expand the blockades. Party leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon called the teenagers “harmless” and denounced what he termed a “ferocious” crackdown with “an unmistakably racist undertone.”

Another round of blockades could come n Thursday, when the budget text is expected.

The post ‘This violence is unspeakable’ – Hundreds arrested as student protests rage in France, school staff hunted by students appeared first on Remix News.

Russia earns record seaborne oil revenues despite Ukraine attacks

30 September 2026 at 09:13

Last week, Russia recorded its highest estimated revenues from seaborne oil exports since the start of the war with Ukraine.

The main driver of this demand is the armed conflict and the resulting blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the Middle East. Due to supply problems, buyers are looking for additional sources of crude oil. This also applies to China which, although it has already secured reserves of the commodity, is also starting to increase purchases from the Russian Federation.

Russia’s record revenues from oil sales

Last week, Russia achieved record weekly revenues from seaborne oil exports since the beginning of the war. Oil companies there shipped about 3.99 million barrels of oil a day to foreign markets. Given the high prices, this significantly increased the value of Russian exports.

Bloomberg estimates that the total value of oil shipped from Russian ports last week was about $2.75 billion. That is about $180 million more than the previous week and the highest weekly figure since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war.

Russian oil is now much more expensive than in previous months. As noted earlier, this is influenced by the situation in the global oil market, and in particular, the war in the Middle East. The price of Brent crude remained above $100 a barrel in September.

At the end of September, the price of this benchmark exceeded $103 per barrel. Earlier, prices rose further amid concerns about disruptions in oil supplies from the Middle East.

Average revenues for the last four weeks

The Kremlin has decided to limit fuel exports to support the domestic market. The ban on diesel exports by Russian producers has been extended until Sept. 30, and restrictions on the export of gasoline and some diesel fuels by other exporters remain in place for an extended period.

The UA News portal points out that an exceptional situation has arisen as a result, stating: “Russia cannot export as many petroleum products as before, but it has a surplus of crude oil that it cannot fully process domestically. Consequently, the oil surplus is diverted to the foreign market.”

This situation increases the volume of maritime exports. Russia’s current revenues have significantly exceeded the previous week’s value. To avoid drawing conclusions based on just one week, the agency also calculated average revenue over four weeks. This indicator is less susceptible to sharp short-term fluctuations in prices and volumes.

Over the past four weeks, the estimated average value of Russian oil exported by sea has been around $2.39 billion per week. That is about $290 million more than in the previous four-week period and the most since the second half of May.

Russia may continue to earn significant revenue from crude oil sales. As long as the price of Brent crude remains above $100 a barrel and Russian crude enjoys demand among buyers in Asia, Moscow can generate additional revenue, even despite operational problems at its own refineries.

This situation may change as supplies from the Middle East gradually resume. Reuters reported that exports from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates increased in September, and reconstruction of some infrastructure began after the attacks. This could ease pressure on the global market and affect the price of Russian oil, even if oil prices are expected to remain elevated throughout 2026 and 2027.

The post Russia earns record seaborne oil revenues despite Ukraine attacks appeared first on Remix News.

Germany: Despite Syrian’s long history of violent rampages, assaults, robbery, fraud, and rape, he has never been deported

30 September 2026 at 08:38

A 22-year-old Syrian man is accused of seriously assaulting several rail passengers in Cologne in June during a rampage attack. However, details have now emerged of just how serious this man’s criminal history is after a parliamentary request from politician Markus Wagner of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

Currently, the Syrian remains in a psychiatric hospital while prosecutors investigate, but the man’s long history of criminal offenses is truly remarkable.

The North Rhine-Westphalia Justice Ministry outlined the case in an answer published Sept. 25.

Federal police said the attacks began about 3:10 p.m. on June 21 at the Cologne-Trimbornstrasse stop. A police spokeswoman said a 22-year-old man “grabbed a traveler and tried to pull him toward the tracks.” Both fell to the ground. Bystanders pulled them apart, but the victim suffered bruises and abrasions.

Police told Westdeutscher Rundfunk that the witnesses “behaved correctly” by acting together and separating the attacker from the victim.

The suspect then boarded an S19 train toward Cologne Central Station, police said. Near the Cologne Messe/Deutz stop he suddenly punched two passengers in the face, according to witnesses and video.

At the main station, in a fast-food restaurant, he punched and kicked a 47-year-old man and continued striking him on the ground after federal officers arrived.

Officers managed to detain the man and later said he was under the influence of narcotics.

He was taken to a psychiatric facility. The Justice Ministry said he “is currently provisionally accommodated in a psychiatric hospital” under Section 126a of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a measure used when investigators believe a suspect may have acted without full criminal responsibility.

Cologne prosecutors are investigating, among other counts, intentional bodily harm, attempted dangerous bodily harm and attempted dangerous interference with rail traffic, the ministry said.

Asked what police already knew about the suspect, the government listed suspected prior offenses that had led to complaints or investigations: five thefts, one case of receiving stolen goods, one robbery, one insult, three threats, 11 assaults, 13 dangerous assaults, 11 narcotics violations, one rape allegation, one count of resisting officers, two property-damage cases and two fraud cases.

However, none of these arrests have resulted in convictions. The ministry stressed that police records “rest on suspicion” and “do not allow a conclusion on the correctness of the allegation.”

Regarding formal prior sentences, the government said the man’s Federal Central Register extract “shows solely sanctions under youth criminal law that are not entered in the certificate of good conduct.”

🇩🇪🔴 "Since the attack, he wakes up every night screaming."

An African migrant randomly attacked a 14-year-old German boy inside Freiburg’s central train station and tried to gouge out his eye.

The victim’s father, Roland H., also believes the attacker may have tried to carve a… pic.twitter.com/Go55W2g9KC

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) September 21, 2026

In other words, most of these offenses were either handled in juvenile court or were never formally tried in court due to the man’s psychological state. German youth-court measures often do not appear on the clearance certificate employers and agencies commonly request, meaning these criminal entries would not be available to potential employers.

Asked about citizenship, the ministry wrote that, “as far as known,” the suspect has Syrian nationality.

Notably, he has never been deported despite the trail of mayhem he has left behind him.

The post Germany: Despite Syrian’s long history of violent rampages, assaults, robbery, fraud, and rape, he has never been deported appeared first on Remix News.

"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources

30 September 2026 at 15:46

Par Élise Rochefort

Israël élit sa vingt-sixième Knesset le 27 octobre. Le mardi 29 septembre, le premier ministre Benjamin Nétanyahou a déclaré depuis une base de l'armée de l'air que des indices montraient que les ennemis d'Israël chercheraient à attaquer avant le scrutin. Le mercredi 30 septembre au matin, un avion de ligne reliant Dubaï à Tel-Aviv a transmis le code détournement et s'est posé en Arabie saoudite. Cette fiche établit la chronologie des deux journées, distingue ce qui est affirmé par une autorité nommée de ce qui est rapporté par des sources anonymes, et recense ce qui n'est pas établi à l'heure de la rédaction.

"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv  : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !
"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv  : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources

LA NEWSLETTER · GRATUITE

Le Courrier,
chaque matin.

L'essentiel de l'actualité, passé au crible par les cinq plumes du Courrier. Dans votre boîte, chaque jour ouvré.

Gratuit. Vous restez libre de partir quand vous voulez.

JE M'INSCRIS lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

Mardi 29 septembre : l'avertissement et les démentis internes

Benjamin Nétanyahou s'exprime depuis une base de l'armée de l'air. Ses propos rapportés : « Ne vous frottez pas à nous, ni maintenant ni jamais. Notre long bras vous atteindra partout et à tout moment. » Il déclare que les services de sécurité disposent d'indices selon lesquels les ennemis d'Israël pourraient tenter une attaque avant les élections.

L'armée israélienne répond le même jour. Citée par Ynet, elle indique qu'« il n'y a eu aucun changement dans l'évaluation de la situation ces derniers jours » et qu'Israël ne dispose « d'aucun renseignement spécifique et concret indiquant que des acteurs hostiles ont l'intention de lancer une attaque particulière ». Elle précise que la déclaration du premier ministre « ne reflète pas un changement de son évaluation », et des responsables ajoutent n'avoir connaissance d'aucune préparation ni d'aucun état d'alerte renforcé au-delà de la routine.

Des responsables de sécurité déclarent au Jerusalem Post qu'« il n'y a actuellement aucun avertissement de renseignement spécifique sur la table ». Un second responsable indique que Téhéran pourrait décider à tout moment de tirer des missiles, mais qualifie cette éventualité d'« option » et non de « menace immédiate ».

Le chef de l'opposition Yaïr Lapid réagit : « Les menaces sécuritaires doivent être traitées de façon professionnelle et responsable. La sécurité d'Israël et les bases de l'armée ne sont pas des décors pour des vidéos de campagne. » Le cabinet du premier ministre répond que Nétanyahou avait informé Lapid de « possibles attaques » avant l'élection, et le Likoud met en cause le chef de l'opposition. Gadi Eisenkot, chef du parti Yashar et principal concurrent du premier ministre, demande vérification de l'alerte.

Le contexte de campagne est indissociable de cette séquence : les révélations sur les avertissements ignorés avant le 7 octobre 2023 occupaient la campagne israélienne les jours précédents.

"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv  : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

ABONNEMENT

Allez au fond
des choses.

Deux grands formats par jour. Les cinq plumes du Courrier. La série Sécession, le dimanche.

Le monde commente. Vous, vous comprenez.

S'ABONNER lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

Mercredi 30 septembre : le vol FZ1073

Les horaires ci-dessous sont ceux rapportés par la presse israélienne, en heure locale israélienne, à l'exception de l'ancrage horaire tiré des données de vol.

7 h 05 — Le vol FZ1073 de la compagnie Flydubai décolle de l'aéroport international de Dubaï à destination de Tel-Aviv, avec 174 passagers à bord, dont 27 enfants.

Environ 8 h 35 — Au-dessus de l'espace aérien jordanien, le transpondeur de l'appareil transmet le code 7700, qui signale une urgence générale, puis brièvement le code 7500, qui signale une intervention illicite — le code dit « détournement ».

Dans les minutes qui suivent — L'appareil fait demi-tour, entre dans l'espace aérien saoudien et perd de l'altitude. CNN fait état d'une descente d'environ 17 400 pieds en deux minutes. Les données de vol situent cette descente brutale vers 5 h 21 UTC. Le contact radio avec l'équipage est perdu et l'appareil disparaît des traceurs de vol publics.

Pendant l'incident — Des avions de chasse israéliens décollent. Le premier ministre et le ministre de la Défense Israel Katz tiennent une consultation d'urgence. Les décollages sont temporairement suspendus à l'aéroport Ben-Gourion.

Fin de matinée — L'appareil se pose à l'aéroport Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz, à Tabuk, dans le nord-ouest de l'Arabie saoudite. L'aéroport de Tabuk indique que « le pilote et le premier officier ont été blessés et transportés à l'hôpital après l'atterrissage ».

Flydubai déclare : « Tous les passagers sont sains et saufs et comptabilisés. La sécurité et le bien-être de nos passagers et de nos équipages demeurent notre priorité absolue. » La compagnie confirme une altercation violente dans le poste de pilotage. Le cabinet du premier ministre israélien indique que des dispositions sont prises pour rapatrier les passagers.

"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv  : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TELEGRAM · L'INFO EN CONTINU

Entre deux éditions,
le fil.

La newsletter vous donne le matin. Le fil vous donne l'instant.

Gratuit, et en continu.

REJOINDRE LE FIL t.me/resterlibre
t.me/resterlibre
Restez libre !

La version des autorités israéliennes a changé au cours de la journée

C'est le point qui demande le plus de précision, et il est vérifiable à l'heure de publication de chaque dépêche.

Le matin, un responsable de sécurité israélien déclare à Ynet qu'« il n'y a pas d'information définitive sur un détournement » et que « le pilote a activé un signal de détresse ». Le commissaire de police Danny Levy indique : « Nous nous préparons à chaque scénario. » Les autorités concluent alors que l'alerte résulte d'une altercation entre les deux pilotes, et non d'un détournement. Des sources de sécurité israéliennes indiquent que l'incident n'est pas de nature terroriste.

Dans l'après-midi, la version est différente. Selon des sources citées par CNN et par le Jerusalem Post, un pilote a poignardé l'autre et tenté de prendre le contrôle de l'appareil. Des passagers israéliens assis à l'avant se sont précipités vers le poste de pilotage et ont maîtrisé l'assaillant, permettant aux pilotes de reprendre les commandes. Un responsable israélien déclare qu'« une catastrophe majeure a été évitée de justesse ». L'établissement sécuritaire israélien traite désormais l'affaire comme un probable acte terroriste.

Aucune autorité israélienne n'a publiquement expliqué ce qui, entre ces deux moments, a modifié l'appréciation.

L'assaillant : ce qui est attribué, et par qui

Aucune autorité nommée — ni Flydubai, ni l'Autorité générale de l'aviation civile des Émirats, ni les autorités saoudiennes, ni les autorités israéliennes — n'a confirmé l'identité de l'homme mis en cause.

Sa fonction est rapportée différemment selon les sources : CNN parle du copilote, qui aurait poignardé le commandant de bord ; le Jerusalem Post écrit qu'un pilote a tenté de détourner l'appareil ; Ynet, le matin, parlait d'une altercation entre les deux pilotes sans désigner d'assaillant.

Sa nationalité est rapportée comme omanaise par des sources israéliennes, sans confirmation indépendante. Le Jerusalem Post relève lui-même que cette indication soulève une difficulté, Oman n'ayant pas de relations normalisées avec Israël. D'autres nationalités ont circulé au cours de la journée sans qu'aucune source nommée les établisse.

"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv  : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TELEGRAM · L'INFO EN CONTINU

Entre deux éditions,
le fil.

La newsletter vous donne le matin. Le fil vous donne l'instant.

Gratuit, et en continu.

REJOINDRE LE FIL t.me/resterlibre
t.me/resterlibre
Restez libre !

Ce qui n'est pas établi

  • L'identité, la nationalité et le parcours professionnel de l'homme mis en cause, ainsi que ses motifs. Aucune autorité ne s'est prononcée.
  • L'origine des « indices » invoqués par le premier ministre le 29 septembre. Aucune des sources consultées n'attribue cette alerte à un service de renseignement étranger. La mention d'un renseignement américain, qui a circulé, n'est appuyée par aucune source identifiée à l'heure de la rédaction.
  • L'état exact des deux pilotes et la nature de leurs blessures. L'aéroport de Tabuk indique une hospitalisation, sans plus de détail.
  • Le déroulement précis de l'intervention des passagers, rapportée par des témoignages et par des sources, non par un procès-verbal. Aucune source consultée n'indique que l'assaillant ait été tué.
  • Les horaires, qui varient selon les fuseaux employés par les rédactions : les trois fuseaux en présence — Dubaï (UTC+4), Israël (UTC+3) et le temps universel — diffèrent d'une heure et de quatre heures.
  • L'ouverture d'une enquête et son autorité compétente : l'appareil est immatriculé aux Émirats, l'incident s'est produit au-dessus de la Jordanie puis de l'Arabie saoudite, et l'atterrissage a eu lieu sur le territoire saoudien.
"11 septembre" raté contre Tel-Aviv  : chronologie de 36 heures et état des sources
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TIPS · SANS ABONNEMENT

Offrez-nous
un café.

Un média libre vit de ses lecteurs. Un pourboire ponctuel, sans compte ni engagement, quand le cœur vous en dit.

Vous donnez ce que vous voulez. Vous restez libre.

LAISSER UN POURBOIRE merci !
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

Les documents qui trancheront

Cinq sources publiques, indépendantes des parties, sont susceptibles d'établir les faits dans les jours qui viennent.

L'Autorité générale de l'aviation civile des Émirats arabes unis, compétente sur l'appareil et sur l'équipage, et dont les conclusions engagent la compagnie nationale du pays. Les autorités saoudiennes, qui détiennent l'appareil, les enregistreurs de vol et les personnes. L'enquête judiciaire éventuelle sur l'homme mis en cause, dont la juridiction dira quel État l'a saisi. Les dossiers médicaux et l'état civil des deux pilotes, par les canaux de la compagnie. Enfin, la documentation des « indices » invoqués le 29 septembre, que ni l'armée israélienne ni les responsables cités par la presse israélienne ne confirmaient le jour même.

Le 27 octobre, jour du scrutin, est dans vingt-sept jours. L'écart entre la déclaration du premier ministre et l'évaluation publique de son armée, comme l'écart entre les deux versions israéliennes du 30 septembre, sont l'un et l'autre documentés et datés. Les enquêtes émirienne et saoudienne diront le reste.

Crosetto autorizza i robot all’omicidio

30 September 2026 at 15:27

Doveva vigere un divieto assoluto, “prima legge della robotica”. E invece:

FEDOROV, CONSIGLIERE DELLA DIFESA ITALIANA, FONDA L’ESERCITO DEI ROBOT CHE VERRANNO ACQUISTATI CON IL DENARO DEI CONTRIBUENTI PRESO A STROZZO PRESSO LA UE

Mykhailo Fedorov siede accanto a Guido Crosetto sull’innovazione militare e ha fondato, con il CEO di Palantir, un’impresa di tecnologie belliche. Roma intanto chiede 8,9 miliardi per droni e sistemi autonomi.

Il 28 agosto l’ex ministro della Difesa ucraino è diventato advisor del ministero italiano. Quattro giorni dopo ha annunciato la sua società di tecnologie belliche, più un fondo di investimento e un centro studi.

Il 26 settembre, all’Arena di Leopoli, ha presentato l’Esercito dei Robot: un ecosistema privato di macchine al posto dei soldati, accompagnato da un video generato con l’intelligenza artificiale.

Le stesse tecnologie — droni, sistemi autonomi, difesa aerea — sono quelle che l’Italia vuole comprare con un prestito europeo da 8,9 miliardi. L’incarico di Fedorov ci dicono essere a titolo gratuito, certamente i legami di interesse no.

La cultura necatrix avanza alla carica ed investe trasversalmente le decisioni degli stati sovrani, mentre i politici fanno i finti tonti.

Leggi l’articolo 👉 https://anotherworld.network/2026/09/fedorov-consulente-crosetto-difesa-italiana

@anotherworldnetwork

Nella fantascienza, le Tre leggi della robotica sono un insieme di precetti scritti da Isaac Asimov, ai quali obbediscono tutti i robot positronici (ossia robot dotati di un cervello positronico) che compaiono nei suoi racconti e in molti racconti di altri autori. Il testo italiano delle leggi ha subito alcune variazioni nelle varie traduzioni, questa è la versione originale:(inglese)

«

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.»
(italiano)
«
  1. Un robot non può recare danno a un essere umano né può permettere che, a causa del suo mancato intervento, un essere umano riceva danno.
  2. Un robot deve obbedire agli ordini impartiti dagli esseri umani, purché tali ordini non vadano in contrasto alla Prima Legge.
  3. Un robot deve proteggere la propria esistenza, purché la salvaguardia di essa non contrasti con la Prima o con la Seconda Legge.»

(Manuale di Robotica, 56ª Edizione – 2058 d.C.[1])

L’idea

Le Leggi nacquero agli inizi degli anni quaranta, dalla mente di Asimov, grazie a fruttuose discussioni sulle sue storie robotiche con John W. Campbell, amico nonché curatore di Astounding Science Fiction. Asimov era dell’idea che, se una macchina era progettata bene e se non era utilizzata impropriamente, non poteva presentare alcun rischio.[2] Egli implementò queste leggi nei suoi robot rispettando la necessità di sicurezza (la Prima Legge), servizio (la Seconda Legge) e autoconservazione (la Terza Legge) di questi “utensili” sofisticati.[3]

Anche se Asimov fissa una data di creazione delle leggi, la loro comparsa nelle sue opere avvenne in un lungo periodo di tempo. Egli scrisse due storie senza elencare le Tre Leggi (Robbie ed Essere razionale); Asimov assunse, comunque, che i robot avrebbero avuto una certa salvaguardia inerente. Bugiardo!, la terza storia di robot di Asimov, menziona per la prima volta la Prima Legge (e il personaggio di Susan Calvin), ma non le altre. Le Tre Leggi apparvero tutte esplicitamente in Circolo vizioso.[3] Quando queste e altre storie vennero raccolte assieme, nell’antologia Io, robot, il racconto Essere razionale venne aggiornato per comprendere le Tre Leggi.

Con la loro creazione, le leggi della robotica si dimostrarono talmente popolari e sensate che ben presto altri scrittori cominciarono a usarle, senza però mai citarle, in quanto solo Asimov stesso poteva. Dopo la loro invenzione, le storie dei robot come “distruttori del loro creatore” cessarono quasi di esistere.[4]

Anche se inizialmente le leggi erano semplicemente delle salvaguardie attentamente ingegnerizzate, nelle storie successive Asimov dichiara che occorrerebbe un investimento significativo nella ricerca per creare dei robot intelligenti che siano privi di queste leggi, perché esse sono una parte inalienabile della fondazione matematica che sottende al funzionamento del cervello positronico.

Generalmente nelle storie scritte da Asimov non vengono esaltate le Tre Leggi della robotica.[5] Al contrario, la maggior parte di esse ha come spunto il mostrarne falle e malintesi, derivanti da impulsi errati.[3] Fanno però eccezione alcuni racconti come Sally, Se saremo uniti, Il segregazionista, Che tu te ne prenda cura e Natale senza Rodney, dove le leggi della rob

L'articolo Crosetto autorizza i robot all’omicidio proviene da Blondet & Friends.

Commandé en 2018, 3,5 milliards d'euros, six rames livrées : le TGV du futur est toujours à quai

30 September 2026 at 14:16
Commandé en 2018, 3,5 milliards d'euros, six rames livrées : le TGV du futur est toujours à quai

La SNCF et Alstom ont acté mi-septembre un nouveau report de la mise en service du TGV M, pourtant commandé en 2018 pour 3,5 milliards d'euros. Fin août, six rames seulement étaient livrées, treize sont prévues d’ici la fin de l’année. Le déploiement prévu en Italie est quant à lui repoussé de 2027 à 2028.

Commandé en 2018, 3,5 milliards d'euros, six rames livrées : le TGV du futur est toujours à quai
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

LA NEWSLETTER · GRATUITE

Le Courrier,
chaque matin.

L'essentiel de l'actualité, passé au crible par les cinq plumes du Courrier. Dans votre boîte, chaque jour ouvré.

Gratuit. Vous restez libre de partir quand vous voulez.

JE M'INSCRIS lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

Chacun accuse l'autre, l'addition reste au contribuable. Le voyageur qui arrive dix minutes trop tard à son embarquement perd son billet. Dans le monde des grands contrats industriels, deux ans de retard ne semblent pas produire les mêmes conséquences visibles.

Commandé en 2018, 3,5 milliards d'euros, six rames livrées : le TGV du futur est toujours à quai
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

ABONNEMENT

Allez au fond
des choses.

Deux grands formats par jour. Les cinq plumes du Courrier. La série Sécession, le dimanche.

Le monde commente. Vous, vous comprenez.

S'ABONNER lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

Une commande lancée en 2018, un calendrier qui glisse

En juillet 2018, SNCF Mobilités validait la commande de 100 TGV de nouvelle génération Avelia Horizon, avant que le programme ne soit porté à 115 rames, pour environ 3,5 milliards d’euros. Le projet promettait davantage de capacité, jusqu’à 740 voyageurs par rame, une consommation énergétique réduite et des coûts de maintenance inférieurs.

La mise en service des nouveaux TGV M encore reportée, la SNCF et Alstom tablent désormais sur “l’automne 2026”
Les entreprises évoquent cette fois des “réglages et améliorations” concernant “le confort” des voyageurs et le “service à bord”.

En décembre 2025, Alstom évoquait encore une mise en service au 1er juillet 2026. En mai 2026, l’entreprise annonçait finalement les premiers voyageurs pour début septembre, après l’obtention de l’autorisation de mise sur le marché délivrée par l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour les chemins de fer (ERA).

Commandé en 2018, 3,5 milliards d'euros, six rames livrées : le TGV du futur est toujours à quai
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TELEGRAM · L'INFO EN CONTINU

Entre deux éditions,
le fil.

La newsletter vous donne le matin. Le fil vous donne l'instant.

Gratuit, et en continu.

REJOINDRE LE FIL t.me/resterlibre
t.me/resterlibre
Restez libre !

Six rames livrées pour un marché de 3,5 milliards

Le calendrier industriel publié en mai prévoyait six rames livrées fin août et treize à la fin de 2026. La mise en service, promise de longue date, est d'abord repoussée à l'été 2026, puis à septembre, puis à « l'automne 2026 ». Mi-septembre, SNCF Voyageurs invoque les derniers réglages et Alstom une montée en cadence industrielle encore insuffisante. Alstom reconnaissait par ailleurs en mai 2026 des difficultés d’exécution sur certains contrats de matériel roulant, tout en affichant un carnet de commandes de 104,4 milliards d’euros.

Comment Trump pourrait amener le litre de diesel à 3 €
2,39 € le litre, 63 000 barils/jour de diesel américain, une décision à Washington sous cinq semaines. Pourquoi les 3 € ne se décideront pas sur le marché.

Deux versions, un seul constat : personne ne semble en mesure de dire quand la flotte sera réellement là. Reste une zone d'ombre. Aucune des annonces ne mentionne de pénalités de retard ni de contrepartie financière pour la SNCF. Or un marché de cette taille comporte, en principe, des clauses contractuelles précises sur les délais. Qui les fait jouer, et à quel prix ? Le silence en dit long.

Commandé en 2018, 3,5 milliards d'euros, six rames livrées : le TGV du futur est toujours à quai
LE COURRIER
DES STRATÈGES
Restez libre !

TIPS · SANS ABONNEMENT

Offrez-nous
un café.

Un média libre vit de ses lecteurs. Un pourboire ponctuel, sans compte ni engagement, quand le cœur vous en dit.

Vous donnez ce que vous voulez. Vous restez libre.

LAISSER UN POURBOIRE merci !
lecourrierdesstrateges.fr
Restez libre !

La SNCF est une entreprise publique, et Alstom un fleuron industriel adossé à la commande publique. Dans ce face-à-face entre partenaires institutionnels, l'usager n'a aucun recours, le voyageur ne choisit pas son transporteur et l'actionnaire, l'État, n'a guère d'intérêt à sanctionner l'un de ses champions.

❌