❌

Reading view

‘Our military is helpless’ – Migrant ambush that targeted military vehicles in Ceuta was pre-planned, claims National Police

The attack targeting a military patrol in the Benzú area of Ceuta last night was a pre-planned ambush rather than a spontaneous clash, according to preliminary findings from the National Police. Now, military sources are speaking of soldiers who are unable to use physical force, have no weapons, and are vulnerable to such attacks in the future.

Regarding the ambush, police investigators at the scene discovered an abnormal accumulation of heavy stones that did not match the natural geology of the terrain. Police believe the projectiles were intentionally stockpiled at the location in advance, setting a trap for a vehicle or convoy passing through the area.

Images of damaged military vehicles have gone viral across social media. Multiple vehicles suffered smashed windshields and other damage in the attack.

🔴 #URGENTE | Los inmigrantes ilegales de Ceuta han atacado esta madrugada los vehículos de los militares españoles.

Este es el estado de algunos de los coches y camiones del Ejército que les ha ayudado a instalarse en polideportivos. pic.twitter.com/KnT9RU35AM

— Vito Quiles 🇪🇸 (@vitoquiles) August 27, 2026

The ambush occurred while troops from the 54th Regular Group of Ceuta were conducting routine patrol duties. Dozens of illegal immigrants ambushed the patrol vehicle with a heavy barrage of rocks. The sudden intensity of the assault severely damaged the vehicle, shattering its windows and trapping the occupants inside.

Surrounded by a high volume of projectiles, the soldiers “feared for their lives,” according to statements later provided to investigators, as reported by Spanish newspaper El Debate. Four soldiers were left injured and officials told the press that sthe all-terrain logistical vehicles were not armored and not equipped to deal with such attacks.

Marco Antonio Gómez, president of the Association of Spanish Troops and Sailors (ATME), stated that the “very serious aggression” shows “our military is helpless.”

“They go without weapons. Our colleagues had to run away to save their own lives.”

Speaking to El Debate, military sources who are directly on the ground in Ceuta say that soldiers have their “hands and feet tied.”

Although the military is working with National Police, the situation remains dangerous. The source said “they have done what is necessary and have intervened in situations in which the illegal immigrants bothered the inhabitants of Ceuta.”

🇪🇸🔴 A young Spanish woman is fleeing Ceuta because she no longer feels safe.

"I don't want to feel anxious every time I step outside… It seems awful to me that all this is allowed to happen and nobody can close the border or do anything."

However, she also claims that the… pic.twitter.com/o6KVfhR7p8

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 10, 2026

However, these military sources complain that various legal frameworks have left soldiers without weapons, and these policies also restrict soldiers from carrying out arrests and using any type of force.

Migrants may even be aware of these restrictions, empowering them to conduct ambush strikes against soldiers with near impunity.

🇪🇸🔴 5 migrants tried to gang rape a 12-year-old girl as she screamed for help, said locals in Ceuta who stopped the attack.

"There were five against a 12-year-old girl. She was a little girl, they were taking off her pants. She was screaming, screaming, screaming. She was… pic.twitter.com/g97pj8phUR

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 25, 2026

Since the attack, 12 suspects have been taken into custody at the scene by National Police’s Prevention and Reaction Unit (UPR). Some migrants reportedly tried to evade arrest by jumping into the sea. Reinforcement from the Civil Guard also helped secure the perimeter.

The Union of Military Troops (UMT) issued a statement expressing its “strong rejection and indignation,” stating they had warned about the conditions facing troops already ten days eariler.

The National Police investigation remains active as authorities work to trace all remaining individuals involved in the ambush.

The post ‘Our military is helpless’ – Migrant ambush that targeted military vehicles in Ceuta was pre-planned, claims National Police appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

Anti-AfD German police union VP resigns amid allegations he tortured a man during Cold War

Sven Hüber, the deputy federal chairman of Germany’s Police Union (GdP), has stepped down from his post with immediate effect following public scrutiny regarding his service as a political officer for East Germany’s border guards. Hüber recently made headlines for his stance against the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.

The resignation follows investigative reporting by the German media outlet Apollo News alleging that Hüber committed severe abuses at the East German border during the Cold War prior to joining the German Federal Police. The report claims that during his tenure as an SED political officer, Hüber placed a service weapon into the mouth of a captured East German refugee in the “death strip” and physically assaulted the individual while they were pinned to the ground.

Hüber vehemently denied the allegations, framing the coverage as a coordinated effort to dismantle his reputation. In a formal press statement, he characterized the reporting as “defamatory” and a “character assassination,” explaining that his resignation was intended to “avert the daily new, untenable accusations from the GdP during the necessary legal proceedings.”

The finger is also being pointed at right-wing media, with Hüber’s attorney Johannes Eisenberg stating the claims began in “right-wing extremist media and from there overflowing into well-known inflammatory media.” Eisenberg firmly maintained that his client “did not commit the misanthropic acts spread about him there,” adding that Hüber would refrain from further public comment as he prepares to challenge the outlets in court.

The GdP similarly confirmed it plans to pursue criminal and civil legal action against authors and publishers behind what it deems false accusations, targeted threats, and distorted reporting.

Hüber’s tenure at the union had already generated significant friction prior to the recent revelations.

Writing in the official GdP members’ magazine, Hüber recently urged police officers to actively counter a potential AfD administration in Saxony-Anhalt, arguing that “police officers personally take on enemies of the constitution because the oath they take stipulates the same” and asserting that an “AfD seizure of power does not release any civil servant from their oath.”

Since Hüber’s resignation, his anti-AfD article, entitled “Saying a True No,” has been scrubbed from the GdP website, according to Apollo News, but is still archived in the police union’s newsletter.

The AfD is extremely popular in that state, reaching 43 percent support of the voting population in recent polling. Recently, a mayor in the state came under fire on social media for threatening to dismiss firefighters who posed for a photograph with Ulrich Siegmund, the highly popular AfD lead candidate in the state.

Regardless of whether the claims about torture prove true or not, Hüber has his own history of reportedly making false allegations against his rivals. He previously faced backlash for attempting to block the lifetime professorship of conservative academic Stephan Maninger at the Federal Police Academy using claims that were ultimately shown to be groundless. Attorney Ralf Höcker subsequently alleged that GdP federal chairman Jochen Kopelke backed Hüber during that campaign, using union membership fees to support the effort.

The controversy triggered a wave of exits within the organization. The Mitteldeutsche Zeitung confirmed that a “low double digits” number of police officers in Saxony-Anhalt severed their union membership following the initial reports.

Hüber finalized his decision to step down following discussions with GdP federal chairman Kopelke. The union has not yet named a replacement to fill the vacant deputy chair position.

The post Anti-AfD German police union VP resigns amid allegations he tortured a man during Cold War appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

‘They did not speak French’ – French teen Constant finally speaks out after being kidnapped, robbed, and beaten into a 6-day coma

A French youth, 19-year-old Constant, was kidnapped, robbed, and beaten so badly by three suspects that he was left in a six-day coma in the hospital in 2025. Now, the case has come once more to the public’s attention after Constant described the attack on French television, including that his assailants were not speaking French when they nearly killed him.

Near dawn on April 12, 2025, 19-year-old Constant was on his way to work when three men changed his life forever. To this day, only one suspect has ever been arrested and convicted.

🇫🇷 This French teen was kidnapped on his way to work and beaten into a 6-day coma by suspects who “did not speak French.”

19-year-old Constant, who has been an apprentice butcher since he was 15, was headed to work in Rouen at 5 a.m. when a car stopped near him. The suspects… pic.twitter.com/Y3u8y8qz2z

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 27, 2026

Constant was a hard-working French teenager, who had been an apprentice butcher since he was 15. Around 5:30 a.m., he left on his electric scooter for a 6:30 a.m. shift, traveling along Boulevard Jean-Jaurès in Petit-Quevilly, near Rouen. A car began following him, then cut him off and blocked the road. Occupants called for him to stop, appearing to need help or simply demanding that he approach. When a truck driver witnessed the scene and tried to intervene, the men threatened him. They forced Constant into the vehicle.

The suspects took him to Grand-Quevilly. Under threat of a knife, they demanded the PIN codes for his phone and bank card. After obtaining them, they beat him almost exclusively on his head. Family members later said the attackers “went after his head,” leaving a shoe tread mark across his face.

Once he was barely conscious, they abandoned him. In a state of shock, Constant managed to walk roughly two kilometers toward home before collapsing. His parents took him to the hospital, where he was also photographed with shoe tread marks across his face.

Constant was admitted to intensive care at CHU Rouen with a skull fracture and a subdural hematoma, then transferred to neurosurgery. Relatives described his head as massively swollen. Later accounts indicate he spent approximately six days in a coma. The attackers stole his e-scooter and phone and withdrew €1,170 from his account.

A witness had already called the police. Officers arrived at the initial scene and found no one. When family members tried to file a complaint the same day, they were told the adult victim would have to do it himself; police later opened an investigation and took his statement at the hospital.

Bank withdrawals allowed police to identify one of the three men. This suspect, who has not been named, was tried in court on Nov. 14, 2025, at the Rouen criminal court and sentenced to four years in prison with immediate detention. He was banned from contacting Constant and ordered to pay damages. He refused to name his two accomplices, who have not been arrested.

Months later, Constant appeared on France 2’s “Ça commence aujourd’hui” with Faustine Bollaert. In the clip that circulated widely in August 2026, he recounted being in the back of the car, being told not to look at the man on his right, and realizing the attackers were not speaking French.

As a result, it is clear that the attackers are not native French citizens, further highlighting the deteriorating security situation in the country due to mass immigration. Countless French youths have been the victim of foreigners over the last years, include Louis, Mégan, Thomas, Lola, and Théo, just to name a few of the victims.

The post ‘They did not speak French’ – French teen Constant finally speaks out after being kidnapped, robbed, and beaten into a 6-day coma appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

Romania receives first €2.5 billion payment under SAFE defence instrument

On 26 August, Romania received its first payment of €2.5 billion under the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) defence instrument, representing 15% of its total allocation of €16.7 billion.

SAFE is a €150 billion financial instrument providing loans to member states. It primarily funds joint procurement of ammunition, missiles, air defence, and ground combat systems produced within the EU. It is part of the European Commission's ReArm Europe/Readiness 2030 plan, which aims to unlock over €800 billion in defence investment across the European Union.

The pre-financing will help Romania accelerate priority defence investments, strengthen resilience, and modernise its military capabilities in line with shared European goals. SAFE is designed to enable swift, co-ordinated action, improve the ability of European forces to work together, and strengthen Europe's defence industry, including through joint procurement and closer cross-border co-operation.

Defence and Space Commissioner Andrius Kubilius (pictured) said: "Today's €2.5 billion payment to Romania under SAFE is a major milestone for European defence and a more sovereign Europe. This funding will strengthen Romania's defence capabilities and industrial base, while contributing to Europe's overall security. SAFE is a clear demonstration of our strong commitment to European security, and to the resilience and to defence of our Eastern Flank."

This payment follows the completion of all required procedural steps and reflects the EU's commitment to providing timely, practical support through SAFE. Further payments will follow, as agreed milestones and implementation are met.

The SAFE instrument is financed by EU borrowing on the financial markets. This enables competitively priced and attractively structured long-duration loans to requesting Member States. The terms of the SAFE loans benefit from the EU's strong credit rating.

  •  

Dolly + The Bioweapon Injection

Dolly + The Bioweapon Injection

TapNewsWire.com | Pete Fairhurst

Lionel Mandrake | Worldlyturnings | 1yfgk.substack.com

(Dollyland Media) Singer Dolly Parton just passed away, reportedly after a“brief (turbo) cancer battle.”

Dolly Parton didn’t just jab in public.  She helped funded mRNA research at Vanderbilt University to help create the CV19 Vax that has killed and maimed millions.

Did they really need her money?  Of course not.  What they needed was someone to get on camera who had millions of fans who that would do anything she said.   They are devious Satanic bastards that play on our souls though our pride.

They succeeded and Dolly paid the ultimate price.

They got her to get the shot she helped produce on camera.  They even got her to adapt one of her songs to encourage people to get their CV19 Vax.  She changed the name in her hit song “Jolene” to “Vaccine.”

While she was doing this in 2021, CV19 Vax deaths and injuries were already piling up and being covered up by the CDC and FDA.  She should have known, but her myopic world was already thinned out in 2021 to declare any negative information about the Vax “misinformation”.

But, Truth is like a Lion and there was enough data out there to tell anybody with a brain that something was amiss.  Over the years since she convinced many people to Jab, the massively strong evidence against the Jab surfaced against the tide.   That evidence apparently never reached her eyes and ears.

I have no hatred for anyone, let alone someone like Parton who did a lot of great things to help people over her lifetime.   On balance, that doesn’t tip the scales for me.  So, how can we lionize Dolly Parton when she likely passed on the fate she suffered through at the end to so many of her adoring fans that followed her ignorant lead?    My left wing local R&R radio station has been playing her music ALL DAY.

Nice lady.  Good heart, good motives and jugs.   But, no brain.

As she was dying from what we now call Vax induced “turbo cancer”, she made a statement to her nephew.   Nowhere in her last, dying words was there any sense of humility about how she might have been wrong about the Jab and especially her financing of the project.   No regrets at all?   Were you really that brainwashed?

This makes her not just an innocent victim but an active player, even indirectly.    In my view, that is hard to forgive, except by Him.

After the last 5 years,  I have discovered how painfully hard it is for people to admit to either taking the Jab to begin with or (worse) inducing others to do so as opinion leaders in media,  government, medical and education professions.

Vaccine, Vaccine sung to Jolene, Jolene and based on the hit Two Doors Down:

Two more jabs, were laughing and drinkin’ and  having a party
And, two jabs more, and we’ll soon be not around.

Actual lyrics here….no  conspiracy.

Dolly Parton’s ego and pride to “help the world”  may have caused her fall.  There are so many out there like Dolly, aren’t there?

And, as a Christian, she should have known about Satan’s trap.

May she rest in peace.

Sic Semper Tyrannis


Source: https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/08/26/dollyland/#more-425318

Original Article: https://tapnewswire.com/2026/08/27/dollyland/

  •  

Le retour du refoulé

JPEG - 76.6 kio
Gerhard Silber. – « Bomb Watchers III » (Guetteurs de bombe III), 2014
© Gerhard Silber - art-silber.de

Cette fois nous y sommes : l'Allemagne est une puissance occidentale comme les autres. Et sa classe dirigeante, débarrassée des scrupules historiques qui l'empêchaient d'affirmer sa domination sur l'Europe autrement que par l'austérité budgétaire et l'excédent commercial, se sent à nouveau investie d'une ambition proprement nationale : construire « l'armée la plus puissante d'Europe sur le plan conventionnel ». Une priorité claironnée par M. Friedrich Merz dès son premier discours au Bundestag en tant que chancelier (14 mai 2025). Cette Bundeswehr « prête à la guerre », selon la formule fétiche du ministre de la défense Boris Pistorius, servira un triple objectif économique, militaire et stratégique : relancer un appareil industriel flageolant ; garantir aux franges septentrionales et orientales de l'Europe une protection contre la Russie ; et, en accord avec Washington, déléguer à l'Allemagne la direction européenne de l'Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord (OTAN).

« Nous ne sommes pas en guerre, mais nous ne sommes plus non plus en paix (1) », résume M. Merz. Pour preuve : en 2025, ses 114 milliards d'euros d'engagements de défense classaient l'Allemagne au quatrième rang mondial en matière de dépenses militaires. Après les États-Unis (954 milliards), la Chine (336 milliards) et la Russie (190 milliards). S'appuyant sur des ressources financières inégalées sur le continent, Berlin dépensera plus en armement d'ici à la fin de la décennie que Londres et Paris ensemble. Cette combinaison de suprématie économique et militaire conventionnelle déstabilise l'architecture de sécurité européenne édifiée à la fin de la guerre froide, et révèle un déséquilibre que ni le paravent de l'intégration européenne ni la fable du « couple franco-allemand » ne parviennent plus à masquer. Certes, contrainte par ses engagements internationaux, l'Allemagne dépend toujours pour sa dissuasion stratégique des capacités nucléaires américaines et, si le partenariat engagé par M. Emmanuel Macron porte ses fruits, françaises. Mais la page de la République fédérale cantonnée au rôle de « puissance civile », sans autonomie militaire, se tourne.

« Dans une ère où domine à nouveau la politique des grandes puissances, a expliqué le chef du gouvernement, l'Allemagne doit tracer sa propre voie (2). » Au printemps dernier, l'historienne Liana Fix a indisposé la chancellerie en détaillant les « dangers de la puissance allemande » : le retour des rivalités et des divisions continentales, notamment avec la France et la Pologne ; le risque que l'extrême droite, en tête dans les sondages, gouverne un jour un pays désormais surarmé (3). Dès à présent, le nationalisme industriel décomplexé dans le secteur de la défense (lire « Rheinmetall en roue libre »), les accords européens de libre-échange avec le Marché commun du Sud (Mercosur) et l'Inde dictés par les intérêts allemands, la capitulation douanière, en juillet 2025, de Mme Ursula von der Leyen face aux États-Unis, conforme aux souhaits de Berlin, exaspèrent le voisin français — qui s'y plie néanmoins.

Il aura fallu pour ouvrir ce nouveau chapitre du souverainisme allemand un chancelier banquier d'affaires moins empreint que ses prédécesseurs de cette retenue contrite propre à la culture diplomatique d'après-guerre. Et confronté à une situation hors du commun. Car le « changement d'époque » annoncé par M. Olaf Scholz lors de l'invasion russe en Ukraine n'a réellement pris corps que trois ans plus tard, début 2025, face à la convergence de trois difficultés. En premier lieu, la menace de récession industrielle déclenchée par la concurrence chinoise, la hausse des prix de l'énergie et les tarifs douaniers décidés par le président américain Donald Trump. Ensuite, le spectre d'une escalade face à la Russie, compte tenu de l'engagement croissant de Berlin aux côtés de l'Ukraine. Comme en France et au Royaume-Uni, le soutien financier et militaire à Kiev tient lieu de religion séculière aux élites. À une population profondément marquée par le pacifisme, surtout dans l'est du pays, le Service fédéral de renseignement (BND) dirigé par l'ancien ambassadeur d'Allemagne en Ukraine instille la peur : « La frontière entre la paix et la guerre s'estompe » ; la situation « peut à tout moment dégénérer en confrontation violente » (4). Enfin, l'angoisse d'un désengagement américain. Le 14 février 2025, lors de la 61e conférence de Munich sur la sécurité, cette perspective a frappé de stupeur les cercles dirigeants allemands qui écoutaient le vice-président américain James David (« J. D. ») Vance vilipender le « modèle » européen, au point que l'organisateur de l'événement a fondu en larmes. Des débuts chaotiques du second mandat de M. Trump, les élites rhénanes ont tiré la conviction qu'il faudrait à l'avenir moins dépendre des humeurs de la Maison Blanche, se doter de moyens propres pour soutenir l'Ukraine, mais demeurer quoi qu'il en coûte l'interlocuteur privilégié de Washington en Europe. Une autonomisation de la vassalité, en somme, que symbolise la construction d'une Bundeswehr à la fois puissante et garante des intérêts américains sur le Vieux Continent.

Récession, Russie, repli américain : le gouvernement parie qu'une même solution, le grand réarmement, conjurera ces trois menaces.

L'épiphanie martiale de Berlin s'accompagne d'un autre chambardement : l'écart de plus en plus assumé avec le droit international, dont le respect absolu devait conditionner la politique étrangère allemande. Un an après le discours de M. Vance à Munich, MM. Pistorius, Johann Wadephul et Markus Söder, respectivement ministre de la défense, ministre des affaires étrangères et ministre président de Bavière, lançaient le tonnerre d'applaudissements réservé au secrétaire d'État américain invité à son tour à Munich : une ovation contre les institutions internationales puisque M. Marco Rubio venait à la fois de calomnier l'Organisation des Nations unies (ONU), de glorifier le « Conseil de la paix » inventé (et présidé) par M. Trump et d'entériner la transformation de Gaza en colonie dudit conseil. Reçu à la Maison Blanche trois jours après l'agression israélo-américaine contre l'Iran (dont il n'avait pas été prévenu), M. Merz cautionnait ce viol de la Charte de l'ONU ; son ministre des affaires étrangères, M. Wadephul, préciserait à propos de Téhéran qu'« un tel régime ne peut guère se prévaloir du droit international (5) ».

Berlin, arbitre mondial de la vertu ? Les dirigeants du pays estiment avoir conquis cette aptitude morale particulière au terme de leur long « travail de mémoire », comme si l'unicité du crime commis rendait exceptionnel le peuple qui en aurait surmonté la culpabilité (6). Soixante-dix ans après la Nuit de cristal (novembre 1938), Mme Angela Merkel décrétait soudain que « la sécurité d'Israël [faisait] partie de la raison d'État de l'Allemagne » et institutionnalisait le soutien inconditionnel apporté à l'un des pays ayant le plus fréquemment enfreint les résolutions de l'ONU. Depuis le 7 octobre 2023, Berlin a armé les crimes contre l'humanité perpétrés par Tel-Aviv, rejeté des décisions de la Cour internationale de justice, coupé les aides au développement versées aux pays qui soutiennent la Palestine, et même justifié le bombardement d'écoles et d'hôpitaux gazaouis par la voix de son ex- ministre (écologiste) des affaires étrangères Annalena Baerbock.

Ironie de l'histoire, cette entorse aux principes de la Loi fondamentale se justifie au nom d'une identité nationale reconstruite dans les années 1990 autour de la mémoire du génocide. Une certitude dominait alors, exprimée par le chancelier Helmut Kohl dans son adresse aux gouvernements du monde prononcée le 3 octobre 1990, jour de la réunion des deux Allemagnes : « À l'avenir, seule la paix émanera du sol allemand. » Cette réunification, la première ministre britannique Margaret Thatcher s'y opposait ; François Mitterrand l'avait jugée en 1979 « ni souhaitable ni possible ». À leurs yeux, la réapparition d'une telle puissance économique, politique et démographique au cœur de l'Europe ne pourrait que bouleverser les équilibres stratégiques. La réunification achevée, l'ancien conseiller américain à la sécurité nationale Zbigniew Brzeziński estimait que « l'Allemagne est désormais capable de faire valoir sa propre vision pour l'avenir de l'Europe (7) ». Celle, inspirée par Washington, d'un élargissement de la Communauté européenne et de l'OTAN aux pays de l'ex-bloc de l'Est, atlantistes pour la plupart.

Très vite, l'Allemagne va se réconcilier avec la Pologne et militer pour l'adhésion à l'Union européenne des États de la Mitteleuropa, qu'elle transforme en base de sous-traitance pour Volkswagen et DaimlerChrysler. Dès le milieu des années 1990, la sphère d'intérêts et d'influence allemande s'étend des pays baltes à la Croatie et de la France à l'Ukraine. Nouveau barycentre européen, Berlin marginalise peu à peu Paris. « L'intérêt des États-Unis consiste à exploiter la position dominante de l'Allemagne dans l'Europe atlantiste », relève alors Brzeziński. Ce projet, qui s'oppose frontalement à celui de Paris d'une plus grande autonomie européenne vis-à-vis des États-Unis, triomphe trente ans plus tard…

Sitôt la Bundeswehr reconstruite, l'Allemagne, qui héberge déjà le commandement des forces américaines en Europe, sera prête à prendre le relais de son tuteur pour endiguer la Russie, voire la combattre. Cette guerre qui vient forme la colonne vertébrale de la stratégie de sécurité nationale publiée en juin 2023. Le général Carsten Breuer, chef d'état-major de l'armée allemande (son prédécesseur a été limogé en 2023 pour avoir douté de la victoire de l'Ukraine), estime qu'il incombe à l'Allemagne de fournir le « liant stratégique » entre les États baltes, ceux d'Europe centrale et orientale, ainsi que ceux de l'Ouest et du Sud (8) : rien de moins que le rôle de pivot militaire du Vieux Continent. Depuis l'année dernière, la Bundeswehr stationne sa Panzerbrigade 45 en Lituanie ; en juin, Berlin et Varsovie ont signé un nouvel accord bilatéral de défense.

Mais la charnière allemande sera solidement enchâssée à un cadre transatlantique : candidat à la présidence du Comité militaire de l'OTAN, le général Breuer pourrait prendre en septembre prochain la tête de la plus haute instance militaire de l'Alliance atlantique (9). Il y a soixante-douze ans, la France rejetait la Communauté européenne de défense, un projet d'armée continentale sous tutelle américaine destiné à camoufler un modeste réarmement allemand moins de dix ans après la chute du IIIe Reich. Le cauchemar du général de Gaulle est à nouveau sur les rails, piloté cette fois par Berlin.

Voir en ligne : /2026/09/RIMBERT/69890

(1) « Merz : “Wir sind nicht mehr im Frieden” », Die Zeit, 29 septembre 2025.

(2) Friedrich Merz, « How to avert the tragedy of great-power politics », site de Foreign Affairs, 13 février 2026.

(3) Liana Fix, « Europe's next hegemon. The perils of German power », Foreign Affairs, vol. 105, n° 2, New York, mars-avril 2026.

(5) Johann Wadephul interviewé le 15 mars 2026 dans l'émission Bericht aus Berlin de l'ARD.

(6) Jan Werner Müller, Another Country. German Intellectuals, Unification and National Identity, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2000.

(7) Zbigniew Brzeziński, Le Grand Échiquier. L'Amérique et le reste du monde, Bayard, Paris, 1997.

(8) The Wall Street Journal, New York, 11 août 2026.

(9) Lire « Comment ça marche ? Les structures de fonctionnement de l'OTAN » (infographie de Cécile Marin), Manière de voir, no 183, juin-juillet 2022.

  •  

Fut-il le pire ?

Dans huit mois, M. Emmanuel Macron quittera l'Élysée. Et, suivant la tradition du journalisme politique, comme si une heure de dissidence rachetait une décennie de révérences, les critiques fusent. L'hebdomadaire The Economist moque un « canard boiteux » après avoir cru au « sauveur de l'Europe ». Deux courtisans parisiens racontent dans un livre « l'histoire d'un homme exceptionnel… qui s'est exceptionnellement planté ». Porte-voix des élites libérales, M. Alain Minc voit en lui le « pire président de la Ve République (1) ».

Ingratis servire nefas — « on ne gagne rien à servir les ingrats ». Car, depuis 2017, M. Macron a, largement, suivi les orientations du rapport Minc (1994) ou de la commission dirigée par M. Jacques Attali (2008), dont il était alors l'adjoint. De même celles de l'Union européenne ou de l'Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord (OTAN) sur les dépenses de défense. Davantage qu'aucun de ses prédécesseurs, ce président a débarrassé la diplomatie du Quai d'Orsay des traces d'indépendance qui la distinguait encore. Paris a désormais la politique russe de Kiev, la politique vénézuélienne de Washington, la politique iranienne d'Abou Dhabi, la politique commerciale de Berlin, et plus de politique africaine du tout depuis que les États du Sahel ont congédié son armée.

M. Macron a aussi achevé de transformer l'État en Comité de salut privé, assurant des dividendes record aux actionnaires (2). La France est devenue un paradis pour les fonds spéculatifs, qui ont désormais la main sur des milliers d'entreprises, dont plusieurs fleurons. La Sécurité sociale, elle, n'a plus vocation à allouer à chacun selon ses besoins, tandis que le service public, asphyxié, vire au cauchemar pour les agents et les usagers.

Le président a joué la partition de l'extrême centre libéral atlantiste en virtuose. Mais à contretemps. Héros de la mondialisation et du dépassement de la politique, il n'a vu venir ni l'éclipse de l'une ni le retour de l'autre. Démonétisée par la résurgence internationale de la souveraineté ou de la planification, sa stratégie de l'offre a échoué. Le chômage repart à la hausse, la croissance stagne. Le déficit commercial reste élevé, au point que la moitié de l'empreinte carbone nationale tient aux émissions importées ; celui des finances publiques justifierait le manque de pompiers comme de Canadair.

C'est donc un pays livré aux flammes que M. Macron nargue sur son Jet-Ski en trombe. L'allégorie d'un mandat qui s'achève dans une double fuite en avant. La cause ukrainienne doit, d'une part, ressouder son camp après la dissolution ratée de l'Assemblée nationale et relancer l'industrie de défense européenne. Au nom de l'autonomie stratégique. Au risque, surtout, d'un grand réarmement allemand (lire notre dossier), voire d'une confrontation avec la Russie. D'autre part, le choix récent d'un défenseur des droits réactionnaire ou le soutien du gouvernement à une présomption de légitime défense pour les forces de l'ordre confirment le verrouillage opéré depuis quelques années.

« Voilà un homme qui a réprimé les libertés (…) avec une violence sans précédent (…). Et qui vient dire ensuite que Marine Le Pen est un danger pour les libertés individuelles et la démocratie, constatait déjà la favorite de la prochaine présidentielle dans Le Figaro il y a cinq ans. C'est une plaisanterie. » Au soir du 7 mai 2017, M. Macron avait, lui, eu ce mot à propos des électeurs de Mme Le Pen : « Je ferai tout pour qu'ils n'aient plus aucune raison de voter pour les extrêmes. » Deux quinquennats plus tard, on mesure le résultat.

Voir en ligne : /2026/09/RZEPSKI/69891

(1) The Economist, Londres, 8 janvier 2026 ; Nicolas Domenach et Maurice Szafran, Néron à l'Élysée. Comment il a tout gâché, Albin Michel, Paris, 2026 ; Alain Minc dans L'Express, Paris, 7 octobre 2025.

(2) Lire Pierre Rimbert et Grégory Rzepski, « Le Comité de salut privé », Le Monde diplomatique, septembre 2022.

  •  

‘Mass psychosis’: corporate Democrats ripped for attacks on anti-zionist Hasan Piker

Hasan Piker, Streamer & Creator, Night, during day two of Web Summit Vancouver 2026 at Vancouver Convention Centre in Vancouver, Canada. Photo By Florencia Tan Jun/Web Summit via Sportsfile via Getty Images
Common Dreams Logo

This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Aug. 26, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.

A growing number of establishment Democrats are facing backlash from progressives for their escalating attacks on leftist streamer Hasan Piker, with critics accusing the party’s corporatist wing of obsessing over an online influencer while ignoring the economic and foreign policy grievances driving millions of voters away on the eve of the critical midterm elections.

The latest controversy erupted after Piker argued during an online broadcast that Jewish Americans’ public support for Israel could contribute to antisemitism. Piker’s comments drew swift condemnation from prominent Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY), who, without naming Piker, called them “dangerous and antisemitic.”

Other Democrats piled on, prompting rebuke from progressives, who accused the centrists of caring more about an online personality than winning back control of Congress in November.

Former progressive Michigan congressional candidate Kyle Blomquist called it an “absolute mass psychosis event.”

Wild to see establishment Dems fighting a Twitch streamer harder than they're fighting Trump. Putting out statements attacking @hasanthehun while meeting with Jared Kushner. It's so obviously playing into the right's midterm strategy of distracting people from rising costs. pic.twitter.com/vhxHN9pTpB

— Aaron Regunberg (@AaronRegunberg) August 25, 2026

“Too many demotivated Democrats stayed home in 2016 and 2024. We can’t repeat past mistakes,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said on social media.

Khanna implored Democrats to stop calling Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)—who is Jewish—an antisemite and “stop wasting time attacking Hasan Piker instead of [President Donald] Trump’s robber-baron corruption.”

“Don’t put Israel hawks out of touch with our voters in charge of our Middle East policy,” he added. “It is time for a reckoning: Are we a party that represents corporate interests and super PACs, or will we represent the American people?”

According to Track AIPAC, pro-Israel Democrats have taken tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions from pro-Israel lobby groups, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s United Democracy Project.

Khanna’s comments came a day after Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the leading Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, announced the appointment of Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) as ranking member of the Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee. Moskowitz, who said earlier this year that he is “to the right” of Vice President JD Vance in his support of Trump’s illegal US-Israeli war of choice on Iran, is one of the strongest supporters of Israel in Congress.

This, at a time when three-quarters of Democratic voters oppose US aid to Israel—up from just 45% three years ago—and after the issue was a factor in former Vice President Kamala Harris’ loss to Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

A majority of Democratic voters also believe that Israel’s US-backed war on Gaza is a genocide, a position also held by United Nations experts, around 20 countries that joined South Africa’s ongoing genocide case at the International Court of Justice, human rights groups, and scholars around the world—including in Israel.

Jasper Nathaniel, a US journalist known for his coverage of Israel’s illegal occupation, settler colonization, and ethnic cleansing of the West Bank, posted on X: “The entire bipartisan political establishment has coalesced around a willful misreading of what Hasan Piker said in order to silence criticism of Israel. They’re doing the same thing to Mark Ruffalo in Hollywood. It’s all fucking gaslighting. Don’t give an inch.”

“What Hasan said is completely intuitive. Everyone knows that Israel’s genocide of Palestinians—and the Jewish institutions’ blanket support for it—has created more hostility towards Jews,” he added. “There is no good-faith argument against this.”

Below is a fuller transcript of Piker's remarks. No doubt much that some would disagree with, but there's no call for or justification of violence – the opposite, actually. pic.twitter.com/AZiksRy4VR

— Branko Marcetic (@BMarchetich) August 25, 2026

Jacobin staff writer Branko Marcetic asserted Wednesday that “centrists despise Hasan Piker more than they want to win.”

“It’s an extreme stretch to describe Piker’s remarks as an incitement of or justification for violence and bigotry against Jews,” he continued. “The basic point he’s making—that the tendency by pro-Israel voices to conflate Jewishness with lockstep support for Israel makes Jews less safe—has been made by a number of Jewish voices, including Ezra Klein at The New York Times, David Klion at The Nation, Norman Solomon at The Guardian, union organizer Molly Kraft, and Hannah Arendt nearly 80 years ago.”

The dispute has now ensnared Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, who campaigned alongside Piker during his successful Democratic primary bid. El-Sayed has somewhat distanced himself from Piker’s comments, emphasizing that the campaign represents his own views and condemning antisemitism. It hasn’t placated establishment Democrats.

Some Democrats have implored their party to keep its eyes on the proverbial prize—winning back Congress—instead of engaging in senseless internecine battles.

“Billionaires are draining our resources to develop a technology they want to replace us, millions will lose Medicaid in the new year to pay for tax cuts for the rich, and we’re spending billions on genocidal wars the voters oppose,” said Melat Kiros, the progressive Democratic nominee for Colorado’s 1st Congressional District. “But sure, let’s keep talking about Hasan Piker.”

It’s not just Democratic Socialists of America-type progressives who get it. Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) admonished reporters during a Wednesday campaign rally for El-Sayed at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

.@RepDebDingell (D-MI) says Hasan Piker is "not what November is about," and that Republicans are trying to divide Democrats over it: "I'm still trying to figure out is it the reason he exercises and looks buff why he has so many followers?" pic.twitter.com/zZLTCHHbTy

— CSPAN (@cspan) August 26, 2026

“Don’t any reporter ask me again about Hasan Piker,” she said angrily. “It’s not what November is about.”

“Republicans are… trying to divide us,” she continued. “And we’ve got to stop letting them try to divide us.”

Weighing in on corporate Democrats’ attacks on Piker from across the Atlantic, British writer and activist Owen Jones said Wednesday that “the Democratic establishment know they’ve lost their base. These smears are driven by panic.”

“The bottom line about what’s happening here is this: The American people have turned against Israel in revulsion at the genocide and want to stop facilitating its crimes. That opposition is overwhelming among the Democratic rank-and-file,” he continued.

“But the Democratic Party establishment remains invested in the alliance with Israel—and they fear being swept aside by pro-Palestinian left-wing candidates in upcoming primaries,” Jones asserted, adding that centrists “would prefer to lose to the Republicans than win with the left. They would prefer to keep facilitating Israel’s genocide and heinous crimes rather than win.”

“That’s what we are dealing with here,” he added. “And if it means destroying US democracy to defend Israel—that’s a price they’re willing to pay.”

Matt Duss, executive vice president at the Center for International Policy and a former foreign policy adviser to Sanders, expressed a similar sentiment on social media.

“You’ve never seen corporate Democrats fighting as hard and as on message against Trump as they are against Hasan right now,” he said. “It’s insane.”

  •  

THE POSEIDON PROBLEM. What the United States should do vs Russia. Exclusive Analysis by former Intel advisor Gordon Duff

By Gordon Duff for TID Iceland and the Russian Academy of Sciences

All links to previous Gospa News invetigation have been added in the aftermath

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize the Missile Defense System Doesn’t Work

Let’s start with a simple question: What happens when you spend a trillion dollars building a shield, and the other guy builds a spear that goes right through it?

This isn’t a hypothetical. It’s 2026. And the answer is: you panic. Or you pretend it isn’t happening. Or you double down on the same policies that got you here and hope nobody notices.

America has chosen option three.

WARS in VIDEO. TRUMP HIT IRAN: Massacre in a Wedding. “US Bases on Fire” after IRGC Missiles Retaliation. ESCALATION Germany-Russia on Drone Incident

The Poseidon Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About

There’s a submarine out there. Actually, there are several. But one in particular — the Belgorod — has been the subject of more nervous whispering in Pentagon hallways than just about anything else. It’s a special-purpose submarine, which is military-speak for “we don’t really know what it does, but we’re pretty sure we don’t like it.”

It carries six Poseidon torpedoes. Each one, according to Russian sources, carries a 200-megaton nuclear warhead. That’s 1.2 gigatons of explosive power sitting on one submarine. For comparison, the entire world’s nuclear arsenal during the Cold War peaked at around 70,000 warheads with a combined yield of roughly 18,000 megatons.

The Belgorod carries six percent of that total destructive power on a single hull. Western analysts have spent years trying to talk this down. “Maybe it’s only 50 megatons.” “Maybe it’s just a test vehicle.” “Maybe the Russians are bluffing.”

Maybe. And maybe the moon is made of cheese.

The Soviet Union built a 100-megaton warhead in 1961 and detonated half of it just to prove they could. They scaled it down to 50 megatons because the bomber couldn’t carry the full version. The technology isn’t the problem. The engineering isn’t the problem. The only question was whether they wanted to build it. They did. They have. End of story.

But here’s where it gets interesting — and by “interesting,” I mean terrifying.

Why 200 Megatons? The Tsunami Question

The Poseidon isn’t designed to destroy a city. It’s designed to destroy a coastline. The 200-megaton warhead isn’t for blast damage. It’s for the wave. A detonation of that size underwater, close to a coastal target, generates a tsunami measured in hundreds of feet. Not tens of feet. Hundreds.

You don’t need to hit New York. You need to hit fifty miles off the coast of New York. The wave does the rest. New York Harbor is gone. The ports are gone. The financial district is underwater. The same applies to Los Angeles, to Miami, to Norfolk — any coastal city with strategic importance.

This isn’t science fiction. It’s the stated purpose of the weapon. Russia has been remarkably straightforward about this. They built it to make coastal defenses irrelevant. And you know what? They’re right.

Six Poseidon torpedoes. Six coastal targets. One submarine.

TOWARD ATOMIC WARFARE… Russia launches NUCLEAR submarine Khabarovsk (VIDEO) with Poseidon Torpedo. US showed B61-13 Atomic Bomb for B-21 Stealth Bomber

The Belgorod reportedly left its base in the White Sea in October 2022. NATO lost track of it. It turned up later in the Barents Sea, surfaced, and waved hello. But in between? Nobody knows. That’s the point. A submarine designed to operate at depths over 1,000 meters, with a nuclear reactor that gives it effectively unlimited range, carrying six weapons that can end life as we know it on a continental scale

And what did America do? The CIA Director flew to Moscow and apparently had a chat. No meeting with Putin. Just a chat with the security services. “Please don’t do anything reckless,” presumably.

The Russians must have nodded politely and thought: “We have six Poseidons. What exactly are you going to do about it?”

The Hypersonic Reality Check

Now let’s talk about speed. Specifically, 13,000 miles per hour.

That’s the reported speed of Russia’s hypersonic weapons. The Avangard glide vehicle. The Zircon cruise missile. The Kinzhal air-launched system. All of them travel at speeds that make interception functionally impossible.

Here’s why. Missile defense systems work on a very simple principle: detect, track, predict, intercept. You detect the missile. You track its trajectory. You calculate where it’s going to be. You launch an interceptor to meet it there.

PUTIN: “Decision-making Centers in Kiev could be targeted in Oreshnik Strikes. Powerful as Meteorites… ”

This requires the target to follow a predictable path. A ballistic missile does that. It goes up, it goes down, and the math is straightforward. Hypersonic glide vehicles do not do that. They maneuver. They change direction. They change altitude. They zig. They zag. And they do all of this at 13,000 miles per hour.

Let me put that in perspective. A bullet from a high-powered rifle travels at around 2,000 miles per hour. A hypersonic weapon travels at six times that speed. By the time your radar detects it, tracks it, and computes an intercept trajectory, the weapon has already changed course three times. The intercept solution you computed is worthless. And there’s no time to compute a new one.

The math simply doesn’t work. You cannot intercept a maneuvering target at 13,000 miles per hour with current technology. You can’t do it with future technology, either, unless you invent something that breaks the laws of physics.

Now, the Pentagon has issued confident statements about being “on track” to develop anti-hypersonic defenses. They’ve awarded billions in contracts. They’ve held press conferences. They’ve assured Congress that the problem is being addressed.

This is what we call in the journalism trade: a comforting lie.

The people who run these programs know the truth. The physics is the physics. You can’t cheat it. You can throw money at it, and you can promise results, but at the end of the day, you’re trying to hit a bullet with a faster bullet, except the first bullet is actively dodging. Good luck with that.

Iran, North Korea, and the Spread of Unstoppable Systems

And here’s the part that keeps strategic planners awake at night. Russia isn’t the only country developing these systems. China has them. North Korea has them. Iran has demonstrated hypersonic capabilities that Western analysts initially dismissed — until they saw the footage. Then they stopped dismissing it.

The Chinese AJX002 underwater drone is essentially a Poseidon clone. North Korea’s “Haeil” system does exactly what the Poseidon does, on a smaller scale. Iran’s hypersonic missile test in 2024 reportedly achieved speeds of over Mach 15 with terminal maneuvering.

CHINA AIR CARGO AND SHIP OF WEAPONS TO IRAN like “Carrier-Killer” Hypersonic Missile. CNN, other Sources Reported (5 Videos)

The old rules of missile defense are dead. They just haven’t been buried yet.

Every country that develops these systems is making a simple calculation: we can’t match the United States in conventional military power. But we don’t need to. We just need one or two of these weapons. One is enough. One gets through, and the game changes.

And the United States cannot stop them. It cannot intercept them. It cannot defend against them. All it can do is promise retaliation. But retaliation against whom? The submarine that launched the Poseidon is already gone. The hypersonic missile came from a truck on a highway somewhere in a country the size of Iran. Good luck finding it. Good luck bombing it.

This is the new strategic reality. America’s missile defense shield — the one that cost a trillion dollars, the one that was supposed to make the nation safe — is effectively useless. It works against old technology. It does not work against new technology. It’s like building a castle wall to defend against arrows, while the enemy shows up with cannons.

The Ukrainian Factor: Arming a Proxy Against a Nuclear Power

Now we get to the part that nobody in Washington wants to discuss honestly.

Since 2022, the United States has provided tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine. Tanks. Artillery. Air defense systems. Missiles. Intelligence. Training. Logistics. All of it aimed at one goal: weakening Russia.

This is not an unreasonable policy. From America’s perspective, it makes perfect sense. Weaken a strategic rival without putting American boots on the ground. It’s cheap. It’s effective. It’s the kind of warfare the United States has been practicing for decades.

CIA-GATE – 14. Money Laundering Network Hidden under the Guise of Charity among US Intel, Soros NGO, Afghanistan, Ukraine

Here’s the problem: Russia is a nuclear power. And Russia is not Afghanistan. It’s not Iraq. It’s not Syria. It’s a country with 5,000 nuclear warheads, hypersonic weapons, Poseidon torpedoes, and a military doctrine that explicitly allows nuclear first-use in response to existential threats.

Ukraine has been conducting strikes inside Russian territory. Long-range drones hitting air bases. Missiles hitting infrastructure. Sabotage operations. Attacks on Russian border regions. These are not incidental. They are part of the Ukrainian war plan. And the United States has provided the intelligence and the weapons to make them possible.

WEAPONS LOBBY – 21. NATO’s WarCrimes! Attack to Moscow, SCHOOLGIRLS’ Massacre by DRONE of Ex CIA Chief POMPEO. Behind UAV FP-1 the Satanic Kiev Gang of Corruption funded by SOROS too

From Russia’s perspective, this is not “helping Ukraine defend itself.” This is the United States arming a proxy to conduct attacks on Russian soil. This is an existential threat. And Russia has stated, repeatedly, that they will respond to existential threats with nuclear weapons.

This is not a bluff. This is not a negotiation tactic. This is Russian doctrine.

What Happens When the Conventional War Goes Badly

America’s conventional military forces are struggling. It’s an open secret that the Pentagon doesn’t discuss publicly, but the numbers don’t lie.

The defense industrial base in the United States is atrophied. The factories that produced tanks, artillery shells, and missiles in vast quantities during the Cold War are largely gone. Defense contractors prioritize high-tech, high-profit systems like fighter jets and stealth bombers. They don’t make conventional artillery shells in sufficient quantity.

They don’t make armored vehicles quickly. They don’t have the surge capacity for a major war.

The Army is struggling to meet recruitment goals. The Navy’s shipbuilding capacity is at a historic low. The Air Force is trying to field a new generation of fighters while maintaining an aging fleet. The logistics tail is enormous.

The cost of doing business is astronomical.

Meanwhile, Russia has put its economy on a war footing. Production of artillery shells is three times what it was before the war. Tank production has been restarted. Missile production continues around the clock. The Russian military is in the process of learning from its mistakes in Ukraine and rebuilding accordingly. And Russian air defenses — despite the criticism they’ve received from Western analysts — are actually quite effective. Russian sources claim their air defense systems are 25 times more effective than anything the United States fields. That’s probably an exaggeration. But not by as much as you’d hope.

Now imagine a conventional conflict between the United States and Russia. Not a nuclear exchange. Just a conventional war. Where is America going to get the ammunition? The spare parts? The replacement vehicles? The surge capacity? The answer is: it won’t. The supply chains are gone. The factories are gone. The workforce is gone.
And Russia knows this. Russia also knows that America’s only credible response to a conventional defeat would be nuclear escalation. And Russia has the systems to survive that escalation and retaliate. The Poseidon. The Avangard.

The Zircon. The Sarmat. The air defenses. This is not a fair fight. This is not a contest that America can win.

The Trump Factor: Bull in a China Shop

Now we come to the current American president. Donald Trump. A man who has built his political career on negotiating from what he calls “strength.” A man who threatens, cajoles, blusters, and insists he can make deals that nobody else can make. A man who genuinely believes that his personal relationships with foreign leaders can overcome strategic realities.

The problem is, strategic reality doesn’t care about relationships. It doesn’t care about deal-making. It doesn’t care about bluster.

Trump has threatened Russia with military force. He has said he would “destroy” the Russian economy. He has suggested that America’s missile defenses are so effective that Russia should be intimidated. He has mocked Putin publicly. He has talked about the strength of the American military as if it were 1990 instead of 2026.

And the Russians are watching. They’re watching the American military struggle with recruitment. They’re watching the defense industrial base struggle to produce shells. They’re watching the missile defense system fail again and again in tests. They’re watching the hypersonic weapons that America has been promising for years remain stubbornly in development, while Russia’s systems are already deployed.

From Moscow’s perspective, Trump’s bluster is empty. It’s noise. It’s the sound of a man who doesn’t understand the strategic reality he’s confronting. And the Russians are patient. They’ve been patient for decades. They can wait out another American presidency. They can wait out the political cycle. They’ve been playing this game a long time.

WEAPONS LOBBY – 20. HUGE BUSINESS OF ZIONIST TRUMP’s WARMONGERS. How a German Industry Became the Golden Goose for the US

But here’s the danger: Trump is not rational. Or rather, he’s rational in a way that’s unpredictable. He might actually believe his own threats. He might actually think he can bluff his way to victory. And bluffing against a country with a 200-megaton Poseidon torpedo is not a winning strategy.

What America Doesn’t Understand About the Russian Mindset

Americans, by and large, don’t understand how Russians think. They assume that Russians want what Americans want. Peace. Prosperity. Freedom. Democracy. They assume that trade and engagement will eventually win the day.

They assume that economic pressure will force Russia to change its behavior.

This is all wrong. Russians have a fundamentally different worldview. They have been invaded three times in the last two hundred years by European armies. They have suffered tens of millions of casualties. They have starved. They have been betrayed by allies. They have been encircled, threatened, and pushed to the brink. And they have survived.

The Russian mindset is survivalist. It’s existential. Russians don’t think in terms of “winning.” They think in terms of “not losing.” They don’t care about prosperity if it comes at the cost of security. They will endure hardship, poverty, and sacrifice, because they have done it before. And when they are threatened, they respond with overwhelming force.

PUTIN: The Powerful, Winning CHRISTIAN! A Great Statesman among Devilish Clowns of NWO-NATO’s Circus

This is what America doesn’t understand. When Russia says “this is an existential threat,” they mean it. When they say “we have red lines,” they mean it. When they say “we will use nuclear weapons if necessary,” they mean it. It’s not a game. It’s not a negotiation tactic. It’s survival.

And America keeps pushing. Every shipment of weapons to Ukraine. Every intelligence assist. Every drone strike on Russian soil. Every threat from Donald Trump. It’s pushing the Russians closer to the edge. And the Russians have weapons that America cannot stop.

The Poseidon Deployment Question: Have They Already Done It?

Now we come to the question that nobody in Washington wants to ask: Has Russia already deployed Poseidon torpedoes off America’s coasts?

There’s no way to know. That’s the whole point of the system. It operates at depths of over 1,000 meters. It’s virtually silent. It has unlimited endurance. It could sit off the coast of New York or Los Angeles or Miami for months, waiting. It could move into position and wait for the order. And nobody would know.

The Belgorod has been out of sight. NATO has lost track of it multiple times. Russian naval exercises have been conducted in unpredictable patterns. The United States claims to know where Russia’s submarines are. The United States has claimed this for decades. And Russia’s submarines have managed to show up in surprising places — including the Atlantic coast — on multiple occasions.

If a Poseidon is already off the coast of the United States, there is no defense against it. There is no way to detect it. There is no way to intercept it. There is no way to stop it. The only thing that stops it is a Russian decision not to detonate it.

And that’s the point. That’s the strategic reality. The United States cannot defend against a Poseidon. It cannot threaten Russia into disarming the Poseidon. It cannot negotiate away the Poseidon. It can only hope that Russia doesn’t use it.

And Russia is watching American behavior. They are watching the threats. They are watching the arming of Ukraine. They are watching the attacks on Russian territory. They are watching Donald Trump. And they are asking themselves: How long can we tolerate this before we need to prove our capability?

What the United States Should Do

I am a policy advisor, not a journalist. But the truth is the truth, and the truth needs to be told.

The United States should stop threatening Russia. It should stop arming Ukraine with weapons that can strike Russian territory. It should stop pretending that its missile defense system actually works. It should stop talking about “winning” a confrontation with a country that has weapons America cannot stop.

Carlson & Waters (VIDEO): “HOW US, UK, EU and NATO are Triggering WORLD WAR III”. The BOJO Fake-Peace Plan in Ukraine to Provoke Russia

Instead, the United States should talk. Seriously. Quietly. Without cameras. Without bluster. Without threats. It should acknowledge that Russia has legitimate security concerns. It should acknowledge that Russia’s red lines are real. It should acknowledge that America’s conventional military power is less formidable than it appears.

And it should negotiate. A deal. A settlement. A strategic pause. Something that gives Russia an off-ramp and gives America a chance to rebuild its military capacity without pushing the world to the brink.

Because right now, the United States is doing the opposite. It’s threatening. It’s provoking. It’s pretending. And Russia is watching, quietly, with six Poseidon torpedoes, hypersonic glide vehicles, nuclear cruise missiles, and the patience of a people who have survived everything history has thrown at them.

A Final Word

This is not a column about Russia being virtuous. Russia is not a nice country. It’s authoritarian. It’s aggressive. It has done terrible things in Ukraine and elsewhere. The United States has plenty of legitimate grievances.

But grievances don’t matter when a 200-megaton torpedo is sitting off your coast. Right and wrong don’t matter.

What matters is survival. And survival requires a clear-eyed understanding of reality.

The reality is this: the United States cannot defend against Russia’s newest weapons. It cannot stop a Poseidon. It cannot intercept an Avangard. It cannot track a Zircon. It has bankrupted itself on a missile defense system that doesn’t work against the threats that actually exist. And it has provoked a nuclear power to the point where that nuclear power is starting to ask very hard questions about its own survival.

150 US Nuclear Weapons in Europe but Moscow Holds more Atomic Warheads in the World and the New Powerful Russian Sarmat ICBM

This is not a lecture. This is not a threat. This is a warning. Written by a journalist. For average readers. Because someone needs to say it clearly, without jargon, without political bias, without comforting lies.

The United States is pushing toward a confrontation it cannot win. The clock is ticking. And the only thing worse than admitting that reality is pretending it isn’t true until it’s too late.

By Gordon Duff for TID Iceland and the Russian Academy of Sciences


 

  •  

With 350+ dead and 1,300 missing, Nepal carnage seen as climate disaster

This aerial view shows houses laying partially submerged in muddy water along a riverside after flash floods at Trishuli Bazar in Nepal's Nuwakot district on August 26, 2026. Photo by Prabin RANABHAT / AFP via Getty Images
Common Dreams Logo

This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Aug. 27, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.

Scientists and climate action campaigners on Thursday pointed to the collapse of a glacier as a likely cause of disastrous flash flooding in Tibet and Nepal’s Rasuwa district, where emergency workers are searching for more than 1,300 missing people after water and mud poured into the Trishuli River valley, crashing through villages where thousands of people live and sweeping away bridges, homes, and miles of roads.

An initial assessment by geologists and glaciologists found that in satellite imagery taken before the flooding, a glacier was seen about 4,000 feet above the valley where at least 353 people were later killed Wednesday by the rushing waters and mudslide.

The glacier appeared about 2 million square feet smaller after the flooding, while the valley was “strewn with ice and mud” and the nearby river was “swollen beyond its banks, submerging the surrounding vegetation beneath murky brown floodwaters.

The scientists said an “ice avalanche”—a massive chunk of ice that fell off a glacier in the mountainous region and into the valley below, was likely at least partially to blame for the flash flooding, but noted that it was too early to rule out other or additional causes.

The satellite imagery appeared to show that “a glacier in the area basically snapped off in a clean break, allowing it to fall just over a vertical kilometer to the valley bottom,” Daniel Shugar, a geologist at the University of Calgary in Canada, told The New York Times. “The bottom looks like a bomb exploded—it’s just deposits from the broken-up glacier.”

The chunk of ice was likely about 2,000 feet wide, Shugar told the Times, and fell nearly 4,000 feet—a fall that would have “pulverized” the ice into water.

Aakriti Dotel, national network coordinator for the climate action group Nepalese Youth for Climate Action said the floods were “another painful reminder of the growing climate crisis facing Nepal and the Himalayas.”

“As our glaciers melt and extreme weather events become increasingly unpredictable, communities living downstream are bearing the devastating consequences,” said Dotel. “We mourn the lives lost and the livelihoods affected and call for urgent global climate action. There must be stronger support for vulnerable mountain communities, and accountability from those most responsible for the climate crisis.”

The disaster stunned officials in the area, where there had been no rainfall before the floodwaters and mudslide overtook the region.

Intense videos circulating on social media Wednesday showed people attempting to run away as water and mud crashed into villages in the region.

🇳🇵🌊 Nepal flash flood kills at least 95, hundreds missing

➤ A massive flash flood swept away villages in Nepal’s mountainous Rasuwa district near the Tibet border Wednesday, killing at least 95 people and leaving hundreds missing, including 384 tourists and eight South Korean…

— Drop Site (@DropSiteNews) August 26, 2026

Tom Fletcher, the United Nations humanitarian chief, said he had mobilized $2 million from the UN Global Emergency Fund “to save lives with emergency medical care, shelter, water.”

The secretary-general of the Nepal Red Cross told CNN that about 20,000 houses have been “swept away” in the region.

“These people do not have anything,” said Rishi Khanal. “To feed them for some time, some days is a very serious thing to us… The shelter problem is there. The drinking water problem is there.”

A truly desperate assessment out of Nepal from the Secretary General of @NepalRedCross: pic.twitter.com/QrJ4vZhmSz

— Becky Anderson (@BeckyCNN) August 26, 2026

A police officer in the village of Syabrubesi told the Times that waves of water crashed into his police station Wednesday morning, right after he got off the phone with a friend who had warned him a flood was headed toward the town.

“One of my senior officers and I were together when the wave struck. I was thrown out, but he was unlucky and was buried or swept away,” he told the newspaper. “I cannot explain how big the waves were. They engulfed several-meters-high buildings in a fraction of seconds… It wasn’t just water. It was a combination of boulders, sand, and thick sludge.”

Seven people were working at the station when the flood hit, and the officer is one of three who have been found alive. He said he was concerned that the other four are among the missing.

Homes, schools, government buildings, and the office of a hydropower project are among the infrastructure destroyed in Syabrubesi.

More than 160 glaciers in Nepal have entirely melted in recent decades, as scientists have warned that continued fossil fuel extraction is heating the planet and causing dangerous extreme weather. The area of the country’s glaciers also shrank by about one-quarter between 1970-2010.

At The Conversation, Levan Tielidze, a research fellow in glacial geomorphology at Monash University, wrote that “it’s too early to say this was the exact cause. But we know that the great ice stores of the Himalayas—known as the world’s ‘third pole’ because it contains the largest amount of snow and ice after the Arctic and Antarctic—are no longer safe.”

Tielidze continued:

What happened in Nepal is likely due to an enormous ice-and-rock landslide sweeping down a mountain pass and gathering up ice, water, rock, trees and dirt.
The landslide was so large it was originally thought to be an earthquake, as the seismic energy registered as a 4.4 magnitude quake on seismographs.
By the time it reached Gyirong Port—a China-Nepal border crossing—the wall of debris resembled a tsunami of dirt. Early estimates suggest the wave may have been 30 meters high.

Rising global temperatures have been linked to previous collapses of glaciers, including in Switzerland last year when the Birch Glacier wiped out nearly an entire town of 300 residents, who had evacuated before the disaster. Eleven mountain climbers were also killed by a glacier collapse in Italy in 2022.

“Every destabilized glacier in a warming Himalaya is a ticking time bomb that can go off unannounced, and when it does, those least responsible for the climate crisis pay with their lives,” said Savio Carvalho, head of campaigns and networks for 350.org. “This moment of grief has a clear message for world leaders: Delay is deadly. Rich countries must finally deliver the finance and protection they owe frontline communities. Without a rapid transition away from fossil fuels, the planet will continue to heat up and lives can be lost in a flash.”

  •  

Images + Memes • 708

Images + Memes • 708

The truth is told very well with images. A picture says a thousand words, and memes a few more. These pages have lots of images and memes that focus on the truth. Click image to enlarge + use arrows to navigate.

Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708
Images + Memes • 708

Images + Memes • 708

Images + Memes Pages • Sent To Your Email

Truth Warriors become a Truth11.com subscriber. Support Independent Media and get the Images + Memes pages plus all articles sent to your email.

Subscribe For $3 or $11 USD Per Month
  •  

Germany: 3 Afghan men gang filmed themselves laughing as they gang raped a young girl

A young German woman from the feminist group Lukreta has posted a video decrying yet another gang rape by foreigners in her country, this time involving three Afghan suspects who are accused of gang raping a 17-year-old girl in Dortmund, filming the rape, and then laughing as they traumatized the victim.

The three men – 20-year-old Quais W., 19-year-old Burhanulla N., and 25-year-old Kambiz H. – are currently on trial in Dortmund Regional Court involving a range of serious charges, including rape and the filming of a pornographic video of a minor.

🇩🇪🔴 "Three Afghan men raped a 17-year-old girl in Dortmund, filmed the act, and even laughed while doing so."

A young German woman says the case was "covered neither by public broadcasters nor by the political Left."

Why? Because the suspects were Afghan.

The suspects are… pic.twitter.com/7rOIcag13I

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 26, 2026

The three men reportedly lured the girl to their apartment in September 2024 in the city of Dortmund under a false pretext. However, once in the apartment, the suspects got the girl so intoxicated with alcohol that she lost consciousness.

“During the night, the witness lost consciousness as a result of alcohol consumption. The accused then took advantage of this situation,” said prosecutor Fabian Weishaupt.

The three men then systematically raped the girl and filmed themselves laughing. One of them even opened the unconscious girl’s eyes with his finger.

According to Bild, the three suspects all have extensive criminal records, including robbery, attacks against law enforcement, drug trafficking, assault, and other offenses.

As for the Lukreta feminist group, one of their members stated that the case was “covered neither by public broadcasters nor by the political Left even though it can hardly be surpassed in terms of abnormality and misogyny.”

“The reason, of course, is that the three perpetrators are all of Afghan origin and known to the police,” she said.

In other words, the media and left-wing feminist groups are very careful when perpetrators of such attacks are foreigners, but only because such cases are rapidly fueling the rise of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. The data is also clear. Remix News reported that last year, a record-high number of suspects involved in gang rape were foreigners, reaching 53 percent for the first time.

The young woman from Lukreta also has little faith in the German justice system and questions whether the Afghan men will be deported if convicted, stating: “Whether the three Afghans will even be justly convicted is questionable. What is certain, however, is that in the event of deportation, far-left Antifa activists will be at the airport to prevent the flight of the rapists.”

The post Germany: 3 Afghan men gang filmed themselves laughing as they gang raped a young girl appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

Rising stars? Challengers to NC sheriffs bank on voters’ thirst for change.

Candidates trying to unseat sheriffs criticize tendency to reelect incumbents and appoint handpicked successors in many NC counties.

Rising stars? Challengers to NC sheriffs bank on voters’ thirst for change. is a story from Carolina Public Press, an award-winning independent newsroom. Our breakthrough journalism shines a light on the critical overlooked and under-reported issues facing North Carolina’s more than 11 million residents. Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism.

  •  

Billionaires, Looters and Merchants Of Bioweapons | Who owns Bobby? Part 2 | CIA + Danaher Corp Connections

...instead of delivering on his campaign promises, instead of working on accountability, reform, justice for the covid scamdemic crime victims, or anything even remotely related, Bobby keeps showering bioweapons manufacturers with money .., approving new mRNA poison shots, not removing the PREP Act liability shield for the crime cartel..
Billionaires, Looters and Merchants Of Bioweapons | Who owns Bobby? Part 2 | CIA + Danaher Corp Connections

Sasha Latypova | Due Diligence and Art| sashalatypova.substack.com

Who Owns Bobby Part 1 is here. [on Truth11.com here] In it I addressed the major donors to Kennedy’s MAHA Alliance campaign (~$8M). Just to close the loop on the political campaign financing, the Federal Election Commission’s Kennedy campaign filings show the total campaign raised about $67.3M during the 2023–2024 cycle. Nicole Shanahan contributed $20M, and the rest of the financing came from ~180K individual small donations. One might say, surely, Nicole owns Bobby now, right? Not so. Let’s not confuse Political Charity with Political Enterprise. Nicole’s wealth is the former: she has a lot of money, true, but it’s all from the divorce settlement with Sergey Brin. There is no coalition of corporations that will profit from government connections and military-intelligence contracts, and therefore, nothing to build a lasting “public-private” empire or a winnable political campaign upon. In US politics, it’s not the candidate who is running for office. It is the corporate-intelligence-military alliance which invests in their political puppet candidate and expects returns when they are placed in power.

As Catherine Austin Fitts stated - it’s not the cash per se that funds the political campaigns, it’s the capital gains that do so. For a political run to be winnable, the funding must come from ideally several major industries that will profit from government handouts, favorable regulations, military and “science” grants and contracts - i.e. the financial “returns” on “investment” that the corporations made backing a politician that will deliver for them. At the same time, major intelligence agency alliances will ensure similar profiteering scheme for the intelligence contractors running a variety of money laundering, regime changes, weapons, drugs and human trafficking schemes globally. These elements of corporate-deep state -military marriage were absent from Kennedy 2024 run, thus, his campaign was a-priory unwinnable. The play was simple - take Nicole’s money and deliver the energized health freedom base to Trump. It worked.

Nicole herself seems too idealistic to attempt such an enterprise. She was relieved of her charitable $20M and unlikely to have another $20M stuck between the sofa cushions for the next season. Thus, she was a useful stepping stone but was immediately dumped by the roadside (and literally bleeding from a 20+ week miscarriage, likely from the mRNA shot) once Kennedy officially negotiated a deal with Trump. IMO, that deal had been pre-negotiated way earlier than that.

While this post centers around RFK Jr’s daughter-in-law and Kennedy 2024 campaign manger: Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, who is married to RFK Jr’s oldest son RFK III, I would like to point out that it is not because Amaryllis is a CIA agent. That’s just her pedigree. A much more important aspect to answering the question “Who Owns Bobby?” is Amaryllis’s stepfather, Stephen Rales, as discussed below. I am including a few links from the Internet Archive, as it seems that the data about Amaryllis and her family has been substantially scrubbed from the internet. Many of these source articles were assembled for me by a reader, and I thank them for this contribution.

Amaryllis is a “former” CIA agent and spy. She joined the CIA at age 22 (but IMO was in the “CIA youth” grooming program since her teens) and served between 2002 and 2010, working on counterterrorism. The official narrative claims she departed the CIA in 2010, however, there is no such thing as “ex-CIA”.

In 2014 Amaryllis was introduced to RFK Jr’s oldest son via a mutual friend at the Burning Man - a very popular annual party in Nevada desert, attended by financial, tech and government elites, and swarming with intelligence assets. Prostitution is legal in Nevada, and practically everything else is legal in the Nevada desert. The festival is awash with drugs and sex and overtly Satanic themes. Here is a good article about it by Nicole Shanahan, who, likewise, met her billionaire ex-husband Sergei Brin at the Burning Man. It will give you an idea on the circumstances under which “former” CIA hotties mate with high value targets like RFK III. Amaryllis is older than the 3rd, and has been around many blocks. She had been previously married (twice, according to some sources). I cannot find the information about the 1st marriage, but her second one was to Dean Fox, from whom she has a daughter, Zoë Victoria, born in 2009, and whose name she retained after marrying for the 3rd time to the 3rd. No public information about Dean Fox is available. It is known that he met Amaryllis Fox while both were serving undercover for the CIA in Shanghai. The dates of marriage or divorce are not available.

Amaryllis and RFK III got married in 2018 and have 2 kids. I am not implying in any way that the relationship is not genuine. All people can fall in love.

Amaryllis’s bio (and here) is quite breathtaking:

While many of her contemporaries were worrying about prom and spring break, Fox was volunteering in a Mai Laa refugee camp on the border of Thailand and Burma. As she recalled in a Paper Mag interview (note, link has been scrubbed), though she was only 17, she knew one thing for certain when she arrived at the airport to go home: she didn’t want to.

Instead, she spent two more years there working in health clinics and helping to raise funds for them. She also entered the journalism arena, recording a rare interview with Aung San Suu Kyi for the BBC, which would land her in a Burmese prison for a short time (!!!)

Here is Amaryllis herself retelling that horror imprisonment (mmm, more like a brief detention at the airport as far as I can tell) to the authors of “Freakonomics” books. I read both the Freakonomics and the SuperFreakonomics, and they are very interesting works.

However, holy shirt! Conducting an interview with a globo-deep state puppet Aung San Suu Kyi (CIA asset, anyone?) for a globo-deep state propaganda outlet (BBC) and earning street cred in a Burmese prison at age 17? Or maybe 19? (Depending on who is retelling the story). Check! I am wondering why BBC had a shortage of credentialed journalists that day to assign such a high profile the interview to a random teenager… but ok. Here is an on-point and a very entertaining discussion about Amarylis obviously being a Young Pioneer groomed by the CIA/British intelligence, starting at the tender age of around 8 yo (at 17 min):

I recommend listening to the entire podcast. Amaryllis is a liar and quite a mediocre, lazy one at that. That’s true to character - “woke AF” Marxists tend to be lazy-mediocre types after all.

As to the high profile Burmese interviewee, Aung San Suu Kyi, whom possibly underage Amaryllis was interviewing for BBC and then smuggling the film out in her um…[redacted]… because reasons - the notorious Aung San Suu Kyi drew criticism from several countries, organizations and figures over Myanmar's inaction in response to the Rohingya genocide in Rakhine State and refusal to acknowledge that the Tatmadaw (armed forces) had committed massacres.[13][14][15][16] Under her leadership, Myanmar also drew criticism for prosecutions of journalists.[17] In 2019, Aung San Suu Kyi appeared in the International Court of Justice where she defended the Myanmar military against allegations of genocide against the Rohingya people.[18]

Given that she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, we can safely assume the genocide accusations were very valid.

After being imprisoned (again!) following Myanmar's military coup in February 2021, Aung San Suu Kyi was serving a lengthy prison sentence at an undisclosed location in Naypyidaw. In April 2026, Myanmar's military government announced that it had reduced her sentence as part of a broader amnesty and transferred her from prison to house arrest (or a designated residence). Again.

Back to Amaryllis’s incredible adventures. By 2002 she returned home from hot climates: she went to Oxford for an undergraduate degree, and then returned to the US to attend a master’s program at Georgetown:

While at Georgetown she developed a remarkable algorithm for predicting terrorist activity and was asked by the university’s CIA Officer in Residence Dallas Jones to share it with Langley.

Per Fox’s bio for Big Think, she “began work as a political and terrorism analyst for SE Asia, commuting between Langley and Georgetown to finish her degree with honors.”

Gosh! Straight out of many Hollywood scripts: youth, beauty AND brains of a white-hat terrorist-hunting hacker… when did she gain that technology expertise? The algorithm itself is a no-brainer though: the CIA does not need any special algorithms to predict their own operations. They just needed to give extra oomph to Amaryllis’s bio by advertising this amazing “code” that she allegedly made.

Speaking of super-freaking coincidences. Another story about terrorism-predicting computer code appears in the book SuperFreakonomics (see above link to Amaryllis’s talk on the authors’ podcast). It describes an experimental project by a British bank fraud investigator, Ian Horsley (identified by name in Freakonomics blog posts), working with economist Steven Levitt to explore whether retail banking data could identify “potential terrorists”. Translation: install mass warrantless surveillance of the citizen’s financial transactions under pretenses of “fighting terror”.

The project began after the 2005 London bombings (7/7). But of course, right around installation of the Patriot Act, the PREP Act, and related pillars of the global totalitarian regime, we have a London focused problem-reaction-solution incident. Let’s see who the main perpetrators were:

Mohammad Sidique Khan, aged 30. The ringleader of the four bombers, he also lived in Beeston, Leeds, with his wife and young child. He worked as a learning mentor at a primary school. Khan was the second to detonate a bomb, on the number 216 train, killing seven people, including himself.

Readers, the compounding of coincidences overwhelms me! Perhaps, the public awareness of the terrorists ringleader’s name, as well as the train number are the deciding factors that got the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan elected to his office in 2016? Isn’t that how the democratic democracy works?

In re the banking surveillance algorithm, Ian Horsley proposed using the same statistical techniques banks use to detect fraud, but instead of identifying fraudulent customers, the algorithm would identify individuals whose “banking behavior resembled that of known terrorists”. The proposed process was:

  1. Collect banking data on individuals already identified as terrorists or terrorism suspects. (Was that with or without a warrant, I wonder?)
  2. Compare their financial behavior with that of millions of ordinary customers. (Again, was it with or without a warrant that the data for these “millions of ordinary customers” were collected?)
  3. Build a statistical model that identifies combinations of characteristics that distinguish the two groups.
  4. Apply the model to the bank’s customer database to generate a ranked list of individuals for further investigation—not to establish guilt. (Gosh, we are thankful that the banking AI is not given conviction or execution authorities, yet! That’s coming in the next version releases…)

The SuperFreakonomics book deliberately disclosed only a few surveillance variables. According to the Freakonomics material, some characteristics associated with known suspects included:

  • Having a Muslim name - ah, the good old racial profiling! Genius. On a personal note, my last name is Arabic-derived, as my grandfather was a Tatar.
  • Living in particular geographic areas - same as above, the good-old racial profiling!
  • Other undisclosed behavioral features… I can guess some of these: attending religious services, schools, shopping in certain shops (halal), buying particular items of clothing or decor, timing of the transactions around days of the week and religious holiday schedules, travel patterns, etc.

Another personal note: my husband discovered a clever Muslim technology - hijab magnets - on Amazon. He uses them to secure the mountain biking elbow guards so they don’t slide down on rough descends… Combined with my anti-Pandemic-Crime career and name, we must be on soooo many terrorist watch lists, I can only imagine! My children got me a this sticker:

Billionaires, Looters and Merchants Of Bioweapons | Who owns Bobby? Part 2 | CIA + Danaher Corp Connections

I think it is very clear what these super-amazing code algorithms are - nothing other than age-old profiling tactics. The only thing that’s different post 2005 is the technocratic totalitarians in power have justified what used to be illegal warrantless surveillance and racial profiling under the slogans of “the war on terror”. The CIA and their international collaborators provided the acts of terrorism required for the illegal laws, including the Patriot Act, the PREP Act similar legislation to be passed in the UK.

Ok, enough digressions, back to Amaryllis.

Amaryllis became the campaign manager for RFK Jr’s 2024 presidential campaign after Denis Kucinich was pushed out by the same donor class who demanded Kennedy run as an independent. Kennedy simply replaced Kucinich with his own British spook of a daughter-in-law who had zero political experience. Consequently, RFK Jr negotiated Amaryllis position for CIA deputy director in the Trump administration. In 2024 Amaryllis was installed by Trump as Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Policy and Capabilities and Associate Director for Intelligence and International Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget. She is also a member of Trump’s Intelligence Advisory Board. That’s quite a lot of CIA titles for someone claimed to be “ex-CIA”!

Amaryllis resigned in 2026, together with Tulsi Gabbard. Amaryllis became a partner at Ballard Partners, where she will co-Chair the firm’s Emerging Technology and AI Practice Group. According to published news articles, Ballard Partners are overjoyed to have her on board (who wouldn’t be?):

“We are thrilled to welcome Amaryllis to Ballard Partners and to our Emerging Technology and AI Practice Group,” said firm founder and President Brian Ballard.

“She has operated at the very highest levels of the intelligence community and the federal budget process, and few people in the country understand as well as she does how government funds, oversees, and adopts advanced technology. As artificial intelligence transforms every industry and every corner of government, her judgment and experience will be invaluable to our clients.”

The firm represents dozens of companies in all major sectors, as well as numerous local governments and academic institutions. Client list includes Palantir, Meta, Bayer pharma, Blackstone, NYSE, LA28 Olympic Games, MLB, NBA, NY Yankees, NFL, PGA Tour, Amazon, Anthropic and many more!

Danaher Corp will likely be a juicy addition to the client list, and that might be the real reason behind Brian Ballard’s excitement over his new partner. Now, we are getting to the real answer on who owns Bobby. Let’s look into the business of mRNA bioweapons.

Meet Amaryllis’s Family - Professional Looters and Merchants of Bioweapons

Amaryllis’s parents are part of several prestigious clubs: the Billionaires, the Looters and the Bioweapons. Amaryllis’s father is the American economist Hodson Thornber, who was heavily involved in the plunder of the USSR post its collapse. Thornber has been part of the highest levels of British finance and intelligence operations over the last forty years. He helped loot energy and transportation logistics in the U.S. and Great Britain in the 1980s on behalf of global finance, and then went to work for Renaissance Capital of London and Moscow in privatization looting operations in the former Soviet states of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine in the 1990s. Renaissance partnered repeatedly with George Soros in these schemes. Here is his bio including ties to Russia, Ukraine, etc.

Amaryllis’s mother is a “British actress” Lalage Damerell. Note that numerous sources refer to her as a “British actress”, as if she is well-known, but there is no information about her alleged acting career, and no major film or theater credits. Also note that in at least some of Amaryllis’s own interviews, she refers to intelligence agency jobs as “method acting”. In 2012, after divorcing Thornber, Lalage married billionaire Steven Rales (who became Amaryllis’s step-father, and RFK Jr’s in-law).

Billionaires, Looters and Merchants Of Bioweapons | Who owns Bobby? Part 2 | CIA + Danaher Corp Connections

Rales is the co-founder and chairman of Danaher Corporation, a global scientific and biomanufacturing/biotech behemoth, with approximately $25B annual revenues, generating $3.6B net profit, but a lot more in free cash flow. In 2020 Danaher was contracted by the FDA to produce Covid tests.

“On Monday, March 2, 2020, Dr. Stephen Hahn the FDA’s commissioner, said that the agency had taken actions to allow private labs and companies to begin making their own coronavirus tests in order to greatly expand the U.S. capacity to test for the virus. Hahn went on to note, “There will be—the estimates we’re getting from industry right now, by the end of this week, close to a million tests will be able to be performed.” The following morning, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services noted that Dr. Hahn was referring to tests being produced by an outside manufacturer, Integrated DNA Technologies. IDT is a division of Danaher which was acquired in early 2019.

Danaher’s main business lines are in the biotechnology sector. This segment supplies equipment, consumables, and software used to develop and manufacture biologic drugs such as monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, gene therapies, and cell therapies. Major brands include Cytiva and Pall Corporation. Danaher products include bioreactors, cell culture media, chromatography systems, filtration systems, single-use manufacturing equipment [note: this is favored by mRNA and other injectable bioweapons manufacturers, due to un-auditable manufacturing - the production line is assembled with bags full of unidentifiable junk and literally disappears after the product is made], process development instruments and manufacturing software. In other words, Danaher is the proverbial ‘buckets & shovels’ supplier to the Gold Rush, i.e. the party who is the most likely to profit off the futile, deadly and guaranteed to fail casino of the “genetic editing revolution” that so far cranked out a ton of poison but not much else… However, the contractors who build a chain of guaranteed-to-fail casinos, provide construction materials, furniture and gaming equipment are guaranteed to succeed no matter what ultimately happens with the casino.

Danaher was in 2020, and remains to date a major supplier of biomanufacturing equipment, including disappearing manufacturing lines (single use) for Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Clearly, the future of mRNA poison is tightly linked to Kennedy clan now, and at a minimum, will ensure wealth and happiness of RFK Jr’s grandchildren, children of RFK III. In addition to superior wealth, these lucky kids are also highly likely to be unvaccinated, while the government will be forcing yours to be poisoned with bioweapons at gun point. Rales is a long term political donor to the Democrats, RFK Jr is a life-long Democrat, and so is Trump. Both are committed to looting, AI surveillance and centralizing the government power while squeezing the mom and pop harder. Is the mRNA bioweapon wealth likely to be a major source of finance of RFK Jr’s anticipated presidential run in 2028?

Building up a near monopoly in mRNA equipment space

Danaher Corporation established a near monopoly position in biomanufacturing equipment space today. Starting around 2016, Danaher has been strategically acquiring companies (33+ companies) that ended up reaping gigantic profits for them during the covid scamdemic. Did they have a crystal ball, I wonder? Maybe Amaryllis produced another cracking prediction algorithm?

September 2016: Danaher acquired CEPHEID for ~$4B. Cepheid Covid Response (Archive, April 2020)

March 2018: Danaher acquired INTEGRATED DNA TECHNOLOGIES (IDT) for ~ $1.9B.

NYT Article (Archive, March 2020) mentions IDT as a contractor.

IDT’s COVID-19 Response (Fact Sheet - June 2020).

SARS-CoV-2 probes and other COVID-19 research reagents (Archive, June 2020).

June 2021: DANAHER acquired ALDEVRON for ~ $9.6B

Aldevron Covid Response (Archive November 2020).

DANAHER’s profits (Fortune 500)

Archive, Jun 2020 Excerpt: “... the company has benefitted from strong sales of its COVID-19 diagnostic tests.”

DANAHER as recipient of gov contracts

In addition to being a biomanufacturing mogul, Rales is also a major Hollywood investor, having financed several Wes Anderson films (which I enjoy very much).

Prior to the scamdemic Rales’ net worth was $3B and after the scamdemic it grew to approximately $9B (!) That’s a lot of dry powder for financial campaign contributions, and what a great in-law to have for a political royalty clan! Quite a catch.

Is anyone surprised that instead of delivering on his campaign promises, instead of working on accountability, reform, justice for the covid scamdemic crime victims, or anything even remotely related, Bobby keeps showering bioweapons manufacturers with money (that ultimately flows into Stephen Rales pockets), approving new mRNA poison shots, not removing the PREP Act liability shield for the crime cartel, and, in spare time, running a cooking show with celebrity chefs?


Original Article: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/who-owns-bobby-part-3-cia-danaher

Related:

MAHA Is A Scam + Grift Op
Who owns Bobby? | Review of MAHA Alliance financials for 2024-2025 | Elon Musk’s Owners + Epstein/Diddy Friends Financed MAHA Alliance Sasha Latypova | Due Diligence and Art | substack.com/@sashalatypova In a recent discussion with Steve Kirsch of VSRF, I said that MAHA is not health freedom. Steve argued with
  •  

‘White Lives Matter’ graffiti in Polish city sparks police investigation, suspects face up to 3 years in prison

Polish prosecutors are now investigating a “White Lives Matter” graffiti as a hate crime in the city of Rzeszów, with the suspects facing up to three years in prison if they are apprehended and convicted.

Painted on a wall in the Polish city of Rzeszów, the graffiti was reportedly created as a memorial to the murdered British youth Henry Nowak. Polish police have reportedly secured surveillance footage and referred the case to Polish prosecutors. However, Polish newspaper toRzeszow claims that cameras are not in the direct area where the wall was painted, making it difficult to identify the suspects.

🇵🇱🔴 In Poland, prosecutors are now investigating a "White Lives Matter" graffiti as a hate crime, with the suspects facing up to 3 years in prison if they are apprehended and convicted.

Painted on a wall in the Polish city of Rzeszów, the graffiti was reportedly created as a… pic.twitter.com/FP1HYP0cDZ

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) August 25, 2026

Authorities also painted over the entire wall.

Major Polish news outlet wPolsce24 has reacted with outrage to the investigation: “The Rzeszów case is part of a broader trend of suppressing the voices of white people who dare to remind them that their lives also have value. When black people say “Black Lives Matter,” it is a fight for equality. When white people say “White Lives Matter,” it is immediately racist.” The news outlet further writes: “The slogan on the garages in Rzeszów was not an expression of hatred. There was a voice reminding us that white lives matters too. And as long as we treat some lives as ‘more equal’ than others, such slogans will appear on walls.”

Meanwhile, authorities claim the graffiti is illegal under article 257 of the Polish penal code, which concerns the public insult of a group of people or an individual based on national, ethnic, or racial identity.

A group labeled “Narodowy Rzeszów” allegedly posted a video of themselves standing next to the graffiti holding a banner and flares and displaying the logo of the right-wing National-Radical Camp (ONR), however, it remains unclear if they sprayed the graffiti themselves. Their post pointed to violence against Whites in Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Social media platforms took the video down.

The post ‘White Lives Matter’ graffiti in Polish city sparks police investigation, suspects face up to 3 years in prison appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

France: Romanian national sentenced to 12 years for running over elderly woman and then stealing husband’s necklace as he delivered first aid

A Romanian man in his forties was sentenced to twelve years of imprisonment after a violent burglary in the French city of Peyrolles-en-Provence left a 65-year-old woman with severe injuries. The Aix-en-Provence criminal court handed down the heavy sentence in an immediate appearance hearing, citing the gravity of the facts and the defendant’s criminal history.

On Aug. 16, 2026, around 3:20 p.m. elderly couple Dominique and Chantal B. were at their home when they discovered an intruder inside. Chantal B., aged 65, surprised the Romanian and immediately alerted French police.

According to Joël Scherer, deputy commander of the Bouches-du-Rhône gendarmerie, the incident escalated quickly.

“A 65-year-old woman surprised the suspect in her home. She immediately calls the gendarmes. The individual then flees. The lady tries to record his license plate. Seeing this, the accused did not hesitate to run her over,” he said.

The woman had positioned herself to record the vehicle’s registration as the man attempted to drive away. While her husband reached for the Romanian suspect’s keys in the ignition, the perpetrator deliberately drove into the woman, running her over.

Chantal B. suffered multiple fractures, including to the pelvis and vertebrae, and was airlifted by helicopter to Hôpital Nord in Marseille, according to local newspaper La Provence.

Instead of fleeing immediately, the Romanian stopped his vehicle a short distance away, returned to the scene, and snatched a gold necklace from the husband’s neck while the husband was administering first aid.

After the suspect fled, police quickly obtained his license plate information and pursued him during a high-speed car chase. The man rammed a roadblock set up by officers, collided with a police service vehicle, and he was then immobilized and arrested in the Saint-Paul-lès-Durance area.

The defendant, already known to authorities for prior offenses involving violent thefts and burglaries, appeared before the Aix-en-Provence tribunal in an expedited procedure. Prosecutors emphasized the deliberate nature of the violence against a vulnerable elderly homeowner and the additional theft committed while the victim lay injured.

The case has drawn attention for the outrageous actions of the Romanian, including returning to the scene solely to steal jewelry from the husband who was trying to save his wife. Local authorities have not publicly released the defendant’s full name.

The post France: Romanian national sentenced to 12 years for running over elderly woman and then stealing husband’s necklace as he delivered first aid appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

DOJ Says Chinese Hackers Targeted US Federal Agencies

The Department of Justice on Wednesday announced several federal agencies were victims of a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group.

The Details: In a statement, the Justice Department (DOJ) said it seized hacking platforms "QScan" and "QTRouter," involved in the hacking of the Federal Reserve, US Senate, DOJ, NASA, the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies. Other targets reportedly included hospital networks, US military networks, power companies and financial institutions. According to the statement, the hacking platforms were operated by a state-run group employed by Chinese-based firm, Nanjing Xinjiuwei Network Technology Co., which it said "target[ed] US critical infrastructure and other sensitive networks" for clients like the Ministry of State Security and the People's Liberation Army.

For Context: According to an FBI affidavit, the hacking began in 2018 and continued through 2026. The Hill (Center bias) reported that in 2024, the Treasury Department charged 10 Chinese hackers-for-hire and two of the country's officials in an attempt to steal data from American entities.

'Exploitation at Scale': Many outlets reported on the extent of the hacking operation. Epoch Times (Lean Right) reported on the QCan capabilities to "find vulnerable systems and exploit them." The New York Post (Right) said the hacking services were able to infect thousands of devices across the globe. CNN (Lean Left) said that assessments of the damage will likely remain private due to security concerns.

'Cat-and-Mouse Game': CNN reported that cybersecurity has been a "source of simmering tension for years" between the US and China. USA Today (Lean Left) said that Chinese hacks and US disruptions have "become a virtually routine cat-and-mouse game" over the past decade It quoted a former senior attorney in the DOJ who said the decision to publicize the hacking scheme looks "like a 'name-and-shame' campaign where the U.S. essentially publicly calls out foreign hackers to let them know that we're onto them." The Hill said that the Chinese government "routinely denies allegations of hacking US networks."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

  •  

Meta Agrees to New Facebook, Instagram Limits for Teens in $18 Million Settlement

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, agreed to pay $18 million and will limit how teenagers can use their social media platforms to settle a lawsuit brought by 29 states that claim the platforms were designed to addict children.

The Details: Meta agreed to pay the states for public health purposes, including crisis intervention services, after-school programs, mental health programs for youth, and outdoor activities for teens. Over the next decade, Meta will also restrict how teens can use Facebook and Instagram, including limiting under-18 users to 2 hours of use a day, blocking access from midnight to 6 a.m., and limiting notifications during school hours. Parents will also be able to choose to default their children's feeds to a chronological timeline rather than an algorithm. The settlement does not, however, require Meta to disable targeted advertising for users under 18.

For Context: The lawsuit alleged that Meta's products were harmful to children and that the company purposely misled the public about their safety. Meta's chief legal officer said in a statement, "Because teens move fluidly across dozens of apps, we need an industry-wide solution. We therefore call on our industry peers, TikTok and YouTube, to implement this new framework right away."

How the Media Covered It: Axios (Lean Left bias) called the settlement "social media's version of the landmark 1990s tobacco settlement," claiming that it "effectively reshapes the industry and the way young Americans experience some of their favorite platforms." Breitbart (Right) noted the states' claims against Meta but also included Meta's opposing argument that "states were cherry-picking features while ignoring safety tools it already offers, including teen accounts that default to private, time-limit reminders, parental supervision options, and restrictions on who can contact minors and what content they see." Reuters (Center) reported that the settlement payout only represents "about three to four months of profit" for the company.

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

  •  
❌