Luxury stores on Milan's Via Montenapoleone cleared their windows and shut early, bracing for a return of the violence that hit the city over the weekend
© REUTERS
O descontentamento com as políticas ambientais e com o poder central alimenta o movimento independentista, embora as sondagens indiquem que a maioria prefere manter a província no Canadá. Afinal, o que está em causa nesta votação e o que pode acontecer a seguir?
Matt Gaetz resigned from the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2024, shortly before the House Ethics Committee released a report accusing him of having sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2017, when he was 35, and "regularly pa[ying] women for engaging in sexual activity with him." The probe was widely discussed as a sex trafficking probe, but the ethics committee "did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that Representative Gaetz violated the federal sex trafficking statute," per its report.
Now two women have filed a civil lawsuit accusing Gaetz of sex trafficking.
The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, says that Gaetz and two other men (Joel Micah Greenberg and Christopher Dorworth) broke federal anti-trafficking laws by using "their public office, power, and wealth to prey on the economic vulnerability" of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2.
Gaetz, who now hosts The Matt Gaetz Show on One America News Network, said many of the suit's allegations against him are false. "The lawsuit relies almost exclusively on a Congressional Committee report that didn't allow me to confront my accusers," he said. "Now I will finally have that chance."
On X, Gaetz posted an image of three women in bikinis seated next to bottles of beer and looking at the ocean and wrote "Jane Doe Strikes Again! Two adult women sued me today alleging they were sex trafficked to the Bahamas. I'm shocked nobody responded to their repeated cries for help, posted to instagram."
Jane Doe Strikes Again! Two adult women sued me today alleging they were sex trafficked to the Bahamas. I'm shocked nobody responded to their repeated cries for help, posted to instagram. https://t.co/HPvX2xypzs
— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) October 15, 2026
This does not seem like especially helpful behavior from a public relations perspective, to say nothing of whether it's legally wise to for Gaetz to be posting to social media about the suit against him.
But Gaetz's point isn't entirely off base. The actions described in the suit against him are hardly what most people would consider sex trafficking.
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 were adult women willingly advertising on Seeking Arrangement, a site aimed at connecting young women with rich men for mutually beneficial relationships. And by their own account, that is what went down. They were taken on trips and paid thousands of dollars while hanging out, partying, and having sex with Gaetz and his friends.
Needless to say, advertising on a sugar baby website does not make you fair game for forced prostitution or sexual assault. But nowhere in the lawsuit are forced prostitution or sexual assault alleged.
Instead, we get sentences like this: Gaetz and the other defendents "led [Jane Doe 1] to believe they could solve her financial problems as long as she kept performing sexual acts for them and their associates," states the suit. But "the money never came as a single payment that would have solved Jane Doe 1's financial issues."
So…it's sex trafficking because he didn't pay her enough at one time? I don't think that's how the law works.
Overall, it's a stretch to say that Gaetz's actions as described in this suit fall under the scope of the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act. Under federal law, sex trafficking must involve an element of force, fraud, or coercion, and/or must involve commercial sex involving someone who is under age 18.
In this case, both alleged victims were in their 20s at the time of the alleged trafficking. No element of force or fraud is claimed. And the type of "coercion" alleged seems more appropriate for a college debate than a courtroom.
There was no suggestion that harm would come to the women or their families, that a job or housing would be lost, or that failure to engage in sexual activity with Gaetz and his friends would result in some sort of other (physical, reputational, legal, etc.) harm befalling them. There was nothing on Gaetz's end that would seem to arise to "coercion" under federal trafficking statute, which defines it as involving "threats of serious harm to or physical restraint against any person," a scheme to make someone believe that serious harm will befall them if they don't comply, or abuse or threatened abuse of the legal process.
The suit contains a lot about Greenberg—a former tax collector who is in prison after pleading guilty to charges that include sex trafficking—and comparatively little about Gaetz. It seemingly attempts to make up for the lack of direct allegations against him by noting findings from the Ethics Committee, even though that committee specifically said it could not find evidence of sex trafficking.
Gaetz is accused of having sex with Jane Doe 1 at a party while Jane Done 1 was on MDMA. But the suit does not accuse Gaetz of foisting drugs on her, simply saying "controlled substances circulated at the party, and Jane Doe 1 took MDMA during the evening." Nor does it say that anyone forced Jane Doe 1 to be at the party or to have sex with Gaetz.
Gaetz is also accused of paying Jane Doe thousands of dollars—never directly after sex or as a direct quid pro quo, but during the same time period during which he was having sex with her. The payments were labeled things like "Being my friend," "Being awesome," "Here," and "Just because," the suit says.
And Gaetz is accused, along with the other defendants, of paying to fly Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2—whom Greenberg met through the sugar baby website and introduced to Gaetz—"to Venice Beach, Miami, Las Vegas, the Florida Keys, the Bahamas, and New York City" and paying for their hotel rooms. The suit does not say that they were forced or coerced on these trips, merely that the trips exposed them to "men they would never otherwise have met, and every part of that access, from the flights to the hotel rooms, was paid for by men, including the Defendants, who expected sex in return."
The women's lawyer told the Associated Press that there was "an exploitative power imbalance," because on one side you had a congressman and some other powerful men and on the other "young financially vulnerable women in their early twenties."
Morally speaking, that might be relevant. And for a congressman, it may have been grounds for sanction. But the fact that these women were younger and less financially successful does not make a relationship between them and Gaetz de facto "coercive" or illegal.
Age gaps in relationships—even substantial ones—are not outlawed. And relationships in which an older man is attractive precisely because he has more money and power than the younger female involved, and offers to spend it lavishly, are not uncommon. The idea that this violates federal criminal law simply showcases how distorted our ideas of sex trafficking have become.
Children have a fundamental right to access the internet, says India's Supreme Court. The Free Press Journal reports:
"The safety of our children and their freedom are not at odds with each other. Our children are entitled to both," the court observed.
The bench explicitly recognised the right to access and use the internet as a fundamental right under Article 21, which protects life and personal liberty, read with Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees freedom of speech and expression.
Meanwhile, in the U.S.: "A federal appeals court panel has ruled that Florida's 2024 law restricting access to social media for teens is likely constitutional and can continued to be enforced while the legal challenge continues," notes the Florida Phoenix.
We were promised REPEATEDLY that age-verification law was narrow, and would ONLY apply to porn. But— as we warned —it was always a ruse.Since conservatives got their ruling in FSC v Paxton, they've pushed to age-gate anything and everything. It's not going to stop with social media or chatbots.
— Mike Stabile (@mikestabile.bsky.social) 2026-10-15T18:24:17.874Z
Florida isn't just using legislation to go after young people's internet freedom more broadly:
Florida is using litigation to implement digital ID through universal age verification - one platform at a time.
Florida's lawsuit against Discord is so far, the most aggressive, in pursuing age verification and surveillance under the guise of "protecting kids."
— Protecting Kids Online (@PKOproject) October 18, 2026
'Appropriate safeguards.' A small change in the language of the Apple App Store's app review guidelines could portend big changes. Via 9to5Mac:
Under Section 1.2, which covers user-generated content, the guidelines now read (changes in bold):
Apps that enable users to create, generate, upload, share, or otherwise contribute content present particular challenges, including intellectual property infringement, nonconsensual intimate imagery, and anonymous bullying.
Apple's new terms add that "Developers who fail to implement appropriate safeguards or fail to remediate identified violations after notice may be considered in violation of the Developer Code of Conduct."
The change is being reported as a crackdown on "nudification" apps, and that certainly seems to be part of it. But the language about going after "developers who fail to implement appropriate safeguards"—combined with the broad warning about user-generated content—could signal a broader intent to crack down on social media platforms and other types of apps that don't implement ID verification or engage in more intense content moderation.
Don't sacrifice due process to outrage. We can't let anger over allegations of gang rape at Cornell convince us to re-implement old Title IV policies that disregard due process, writes Robert Shipley of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:
There's a groundswell of demand to "do something" in the wake of the sexual assault claims at Cornell. But amid the outrage and concern over the incident, it's critical to remember that one attempted remedy we actually know will not work is to return to a campus justice system in which the burden of proof is on the accused and basic civil liberties are cast aside. That social experiment has already been run. It failed.
Title IX, the law against sex discrimination in federally funded education programs, was passed in 1972. Debates at the time focused on how it would affect single-sex colleges and college athletics. Explicitly aimed at sex discrimination, the text of the law itself mentions neither sexual assault nor sexual harassment. Those became matters for Title IX gradually over the next couple of decades, as courts determined that sexual assault and sexual harassment were both forms of sex discrimination, and therefore covered under Title IX.
The Jane Doe lawsuit against Cornell and the accused students (as well as a fraternity, a sorority, and a local bar) hit national news at nearly the same time that the Trump administration officially removed the Biden-era regulations from the Federal Register. While almost certainly not related, some have connected the two, citing the Cornell incident to argue that regulations surrounding Title IX need to be changed again to reduce due process protections for the accused.
More here.
Not to pick on Sam here, but this is a useful point to highlight some of the impossibility of trust & safety work. Meta actually used to have a program *exactly* like this, BUT it became a central feature of Frances Haugen's Facebook Files as an example of Meta being evil.I'll explain…
• A new pair of high-tech sunglasses from Meta "can read your mail, describe the person in front of you, tell you what is on a restaurant menu, and help you find your way home," writes Reason's Reem Ibrahim. "For the approximately 700,000 Americans who are blind, it is potentially life-changing."
• "The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld a decision ordering new trials for two people facing human trafficking and sexual services offences, after concluding they should have been able to cross-examine a complainant about the commercial aspect of her prior sex work," reports The Canadian Press. "The case looked at the application of section 276 of the Criminal Code, known as the rape shield law, which limits use of evidence about a complainant's sexual history in court proceedings."
• Markets in everything:
This website lets you attend the wedding of complete strangers
Couples list their weddings and users can buy a ticket to attend https://t.co/8b7EawyFod
— Dexerto (@Dexerto) October 18, 2026
• Reclaim the Net explains Germany's new digital ID.
• The People First Transportation Alliance has been campaigning against robot taxis in D.C. "But just who is behind the group remains unclear, even as it has sought to sway the outcome of a contentious issue with vast sums of money and thousands of jobs at stake across the country," reports The Washington Post.
• From Reason's Meagan O'Rourke: In a race that could flip the U.S. House of Representatives, nobody wants to be the pro-tech candidate.
• A proposed App Store Accountability Act in Idaho "is a de facto digital ID," warns Julie Barrett.
The post Matt Gaetz Lawsuit Shows How Twisted the Term 'Sex Trafficking' Has Become appeared first on Reason Magazine.
Il gala per il 51° anniversario della National Italian American Foundation (Niaf), svoltosi sabato al Washington Hilton, ha riunito alcuni dei principali protagonisti del mondo imprenditoriale italiano, rappresentanti politici e personalità di spicco della comunità italoamericana, mettendo in evidenza i due pilastri su cui poggiano le relazioni tra Italia e Stati Uniti: cooperazione politica e partnership economica.
L’evento ha offerto una rappresentazione concreta del ruolo della Niaf come ponte transatlantico, capace di collegare istituzioni, industria e una comunità la cui influenza va ben oltre la dimensione culturale. In una fase segnata da incertezze geopolitiche e trasformazioni industriali, la diplomazia economica assume un’importanza sempre più paragonabile a quella del dialogo politico nel sostenere il rapporto bilaterale. La serata di Washington ha mostrato come queste due dimensioni si rafforzino reciprocamente.
La presenza delle imprese ha rispecchiato l’ampiezza degli interessi economici italiani sulle due sponde dell’Atlantico. Tra i principali protagonisti figuravano Fincantieri, Leonardo, Intesa Sanpaolo, Ferrovie dello Stato, Almaviva, Terna, Italgas, GE Healthcare, SHRO, Colavita, Ferrero e Campari Group, espressione di settori che spaziano dalla difesa alla cantieristica navale, dall’energia alle infrastrutture, dalla finanza alla tecnologia, fino alla sanità e ai beni di consumo. Il gala ha ricevuto inoltre il sostegno di HHH – Hospital Healthcare Holdings, parte di GKSD Investment Holding, a ulteriore conferma del coinvolgimento del settore privato.
Questa dimensione economica si inserisce in un contesto più ampio di dialogo transatlantico, al quale contribuisce anche l’American Chamber of Commerce in Italy (AmCham), impegnata a favorire i collegamenti tra imprese, investitori e istituzioni dei due Paesi. Le partnership industriali assumono infatti un peso crescente per la sicurezza nazionale, la competitività tecnologica e la resilienza economica. Per Italia e Stati Uniti, il coinvolgimento delle aziende garantisce continuità e sostanza operativa a una relazione tradizionalmente costruita sulla diplomazia e sulla condivisione di priorità politiche.
Altrettanto significativa è stata la partecipazione politica e istituzionale, rafforzata dal videomessaggio della presidente del Consiglio Giorgia Meloni, che ha inquadrato l’anniversario nel contesto dei 250 anni dell’indipendenza americana e del contributo storico della comunità italiana alla costruzione degli Stati Uniti.
“La storia degli italoamericani è la storia stessa dell’America”, ha affermato Meloni, ricordando una nazione costruita attraverso il coraggio, il sacrificio e la ricerca di un futuro migliore. La premier ha richiamato anche la figura di Filippo Mazzei e la sua influenza su Thomas Jefferson come esempio del contributo italiano alla nascita degli Stati Uniti.
“Da oltre cinquant’anni, la Niaf rappresenta un ponte essenziale tra Italia e Stati Uniti”, ha aggiunto, descrivendo un legame fondato sulla storia condivisa, sui rapporti familiari, sulla cultura e sui valori comuni.
Il suo intervento ha assunto anche una dimensione geopolitica più ampia. “In questi tempi di crisi, il legame tra Italia e Stati Uniti rimane cruciale”, ha sottolineato Meloni, richiamando la necessità per i due Paesi di continuare a difendere la libertà e la democrazia.
La rappresentanza politica comprendeva l’ex segretario di Stato americano Mike Pompeo, l’ex ministro degli Esteri Angelino Alfano, il vicepresidente della Camera Giorgio Mulè e i parlamentari Carlo Fidanza, Alessandro Cattaneo, Christian Di Sanzo ed Elena Murelli. Tra le personalità diplomatiche e istituzionali erano presenti l’ambasciatore italiano a Washington Marco Peronaci, Damiano Beleffi, Raffaele Cattaneo, Giampiero Zinzi e Antonio Giordano.
Significativa anche la partecipazione delle Regioni, con i presidenti del Lazio Francesco Rocca, della Lombardia Attilio Fontana e del Friuli Venezia Giulia Massimiliano Fedriga. Il programma della Niaf ha inoltre ospitato un confronto sulle relazioni tra Italia e Stati Uniti tra Pompeo e Alfano, moderato dalla giornalista economico-finanziaria Maria Bartiromo.
L’ampiezza della partecipazione politica ha evidenziato i diversi livelli attraverso cui si sviluppa il rapporto bilaterale: dalla diplomazia nazionale agli scambi parlamentari, dalla cooperazione regionale alle partnership industriali. Le parole di Meloni hanno richiamato le fondamenta storiche e politiche di questa relazione, mentre la presenza di rappresentanti istituzionali e imprenditoriali ne ha mostrato la dimensione operativa.
Un’attenzione particolare è stata riservata alla Lombardia, scelta dalla Niaf come Regione d’Onore 2026 per il suo contributo all’industria, al design, alla moda e all’innovazione, oltre che per i consolidati rapporti economici e istituzionali con gli Stati Uniti. Fontana ha ribadito l’impegno della Regione nel rafforzamento delle relazioni transatlantiche, mentre la celebrazione ha offerto l’occasione per valorizzare uno dei principali poli manifatturieri e dell’innovazione europei. Il riconoscimento ha sottolineato come la relazione economica tra Italia e Stati Uniti sia alimentata non soltanto dalle politiche nazionali e dai grandi gruppi industriali, ma anche dagli ecosistemi produttivi territoriali.
Tra i protagonisti della serata figurava Pierroberto Folgiero, amministratore delegato di Fincantieri, insignito del Niaf Dea Roma Special Achievement Award for Outstanding Leadership in the Maritime Industry. Il riconoscimento ha valorizzato il posizionamento internazionale del gruppo e la sua crescente rilevanza strategica, in particolare nella cantieristica avanzata, nelle tecnologie digitali e nelle capacità subacquee.
“Sono orgoglioso di guidare una squadra concentrata sulle navi digitali del futuro e sul dominio subacqueo, facendo leva sull’affidabilità tecnica italiana”, ha dichiarato Folgiero, descrivendo il premio come un ponte tra «Italia e Stati Uniti, tradizione e futuro, ambizione individuale e orgoglio collettivo».
La presenza industriale di Fincantieri negli Stati Uniti conferisce al riconoscimento una dimensione concreta. Attraverso Fincantieri Marine Group, l’azienda opera in quattro cantieri americani, impiega circa 3.000 persone e ha investito oltre 800 milioni di dollari nelle proprie attività statunitensi, anche nell’ambito della collaborazione con la Marina americana.
Il tema della leadership imprenditoriale si è esteso oltre la cantieristica. Anche Anthony Capuano, presidente e amministratore delegato di Marriott International, è stato premiato per la sua leadership nel settore dell’ospitalità, a testimonianza dell’influenza della comunità italoamericana in alcuni dei principali comparti dell’economia statunitense.
Per il presidente e amministratore delegato della Niaf Robert Allegrini, l’anniversario ha rappresentato un’occasione per riaffermare la missione della Fondazione nel collegare generazioni diverse e rafforzare i rapporti tra Italia e Stati Uniti. “Da 51 anni, la Niaf funge da ponte tra l’Italia e gli Stati Uniti”, ha dichiarato, sottolineando come la serata rappresentasse un’espressione concreta della missione dell’organizzazione.
Anche il presidente del consiglio di amministrazione della Niaf John Calvelli ha evidenziato l’importanza di investire nelle nuove generazioni e di preservare i legami che hanno contribuito a plasmare la comunità italoamericana.
Il gala ha così mostrato come un’istituzione nata per valorizzare un patrimonio culturale condiviso possa svolgere anche una funzione di piattaforma per il dialogo politico, le relazioni imprenditoriali e la cooperazione transatlantica.
Il fine settimana di Washington ha ospitato inoltre la quarta edizione degli Italpress Awards, organizzati dall’agenzia di stampa fondata e diretta da Gaspare Borsellino, in collaborazione con la Niaf. La cerimonia ha premiato personalità italiane e italoamericane che contribuiscono alla valorizzazione internazionale delle eccellenze italiane.
Tra i riconoscimenti figuravano quelli assegnati al presidente lombardo Fontana, all’ambasciatore Peronaci, al rappresentante permanente italiano presso le Nazioni Unite Giorgio Marrapodi, al giornalista Gianni Riotta e al presidente di Ferrovie dello Stato Tommaso Tanzilli. L’evento ha riunito rappresentanti della diplomazia, delle imprese, delle istituzioni e dei media. La galleria fotografica pubblicata offre una panoramica degli ospiti e delle personalità presenti alla manifestazione.
Nel complesso, il 51° anniversario della Niaf ha restituito l’immagine di una relazione bilaterale sempre più sostenuta dalla convergenza tra diplomazia politica, cooperazione industriale e legami culturali. I governi continuano a fornire il quadro istituzionale, mentre imprese, economie regionali e reti transatlantiche contribuiscono a tradurre questa partnership in rapporti economici e strategici duraturi.
A medida foi tomada depois de a Meta não cumprir um prazo inicial de 72 horas para apresentar as informações.
A coligação Brasil Pronto pra Mais, de apoio a Lula, apresentou dados segundo os quais a Meta estaria desfavorecendo conteúdos do campo político de Lula e dando destaque ao campo adversário, infringindo a legislação eleitoral. Outra queixa está numa possível desigualdade no impulsionamento de anúncios pagos.
A campanha do presidenciável Flávio Bolsonaro também ingressou com reclamação semelhante no TSE.
Na última sexta-feira (16), o plenário do TSE manteve uma primeira decisão de Bellizze, que ordenou à Meta o tratamento isonômico imediato das campanhas em suas plataformas. A multa diária por descumprimento, caso a empresa não demonstre a adoção de medidas que garantam a exposição igualitária das campanhas, foi estipulada em R$ 500 mil.
Nesta segunda (19), Bellizze proferiu nova decisão, determinando o envio das informações em 24 horas, e elevou a multa para R$ 1 milhão. O ministro elencou os seguintes pontos a serem esclarecidos:
Como funcionam os sistemas de recomendação de posts nas plataformas;
Dados sobre o alcance dos anúncios das duas candidaturas que disputam o segundo turno;
Apresentação de investigações sobre possíveis redes de perfis inautênticos;
Informações sobre conteúdos que deveriam receber identificação por terem sido produzidos ou alterados sinteticamente.
Após o PT denunciar as falhas, a Meta declarou que a recomendação de candidatos foi proibida, conforme determinação do TSE. A plataforma também informou que tomou medidas adicionais para restringir as recomendações.
“Em cumprimento às regras eleitorais do Brasil, nós proibimos temporariamente a recomendação de candidatos ou a geração de imagens deles. Tomamos medidas adicionais para que comandos usando apenas o primeiro nome dos candidatos e seu número nas urnas também não produzam imagens”, afirmou a empresa.
Police appear to have been taken by surprise by scale of looting that began after protests turned violent in Paris and other cities
Just before 1am on Monday morning, two motorbikes carrying one passenger each stopped at a traffic light on a backstreet near rue de Rivoli, one of central Paris’s busiest shopping streets.
“You’ve got to go where there are a lot of people, where they’ve done the shop windows,” said one motorbike rider to another. Minutes later 10 other men, their faces covered with ski balaclavas, came down the street on foot pursued by a police van.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Jeanne Accorsini/SIPA/Shutterstock
© Photograph: Jeanne Accorsini/SIPA/Shutterstock
© Photograph: Jeanne Accorsini/SIPA/Shutterstock
O memorial tinha sido criado espontaneamente junto à casa onde viveu durante sete décadas, depois da sua morte, e reunia velas, flores e mensagens de homenagem.
Rachael Wright for BI
Cooley has made billions doing what law firms do: hire great lawyers, bill for their time, and keep clients happy. Artificial intelligence is scrambling that formula. If machines can do in minutes what once took an associate hours, what exactly should clients be paying for?
Rachel Proffitt thinks she has the answer.
On a toasty October afternoon in San Francisco, I met Proffitt for lunch to talk about the future of the global law firm she now leads. When the check arrived, neither of us knew how much the restaurant paid the dishwasher or how many minutes the chef spent preparing our meal. We were paying for the experience, not the labor behind it.
Why, she wondered, should legal services be so different?
"Clients have never been excited about the fact that it took us 82 hours to do something. They don't care," she says. "They just want the outcome. They want the results."
The billable hour is only the beginning. AI is forcing law firms to rethink how many associates they really need and how those young lawyers learn their craft. Client relationships are changing as companies use software to get a head start on the work they send to outside counsel. Some of that work may never reach a lawyer at all.
If tech is about to reinvent law firms, Cooley should be one of the firms with the clearest view of what's coming. From its early days on San Francisco's Market Street, it worked with semiconductor manufacturers and venture capitalists when the valley was still covered in fruit trees and canneries. Cooley grew up alongside the tech industry, and today it is as comfortable defending Meta in court as it is helping Andreessen Horowitz round up billion-dollar funds.
That evolution has been lucrative. Cooley says its gross revenue jumped from $912 million in 2015 to $2.4 billion last fiscal year. Its crosstown rival, Wilson Sonsini, brought in $1.7 billion in 2025, according to The American Lawyer. Still, the gulf between Cooley and Big Law's largest firms remains enormous. Kirkland & Ellis, the industry's revenue leader, cracked $10 billion last year. Latham & Watkins, another go-to firm for Silicon Valley, hit $8.3 billion.
The next wave of tech public listings promises a fortune in legal fees for the chosen few. Gibson Dunn landed SpaceX's IPO. Anthropic tapped Wilson Sonsini for its coming listing. And Cooley is reportedly sharing OpenAI's IPO work with Wachtell Lipton, one of Wall Street's most formidable law firms.
The irony is hard to miss. Big Law is fighting for a piece of the biggest technology companies in the world, even as those companies build the tools that could upend the business of law itself.
Proffitt came up as a lawyer under the old rules. Her next task is to figure out what it will take to build a great law firm under the new ones.
Rachael Wright for BI
Profitt didn't grow up wanting to be a lawyer but liked how law school taught her to think. Litigation was out of the question: Public speaking during mock trials made her stomach turn. "It was transactional law or bust," she says.
She started her career as a summer associate at Wilson Sonsini and worked her way up to partner. She fell in love with the intensity of the work, pulling all-nighters at the financial printers where she marked up securities filings by hand. She recalls the Christmas Eve when her father marveled that she had made it through the day without taking a work call. After 15 years at the firm, she left for Cooley in 2017.
Three years ago, Proffitt got a call at home that she didn't see coming. Joe Conroy, then Cooley's chief executive, wanted to know whether she would consider succeeding him.
She was flattered, but also "a bit terrified," she says. She spent two decades helping startups, including Unity Software, Procore, and Instacart, raise money and go public. Running a firm with 3,000 employees was another matter. She talked to her family, then put herself forward for the job. She started in 2024.
Proffitt couldn't have guessed how quickly AI would jolt her industry from its steady state. It wasn't too long ago that clients insisted that the technology go nowhere near their work, fearing what would happen if their data disappeared into someone else's model.
"It was clear to me then that we don't get to just exist as we are and continue to be at the top of our game," she says.
Cooley had remade itself once before. The firm's Silicon Valley roots were both a strength and a liability, said Conroy in an interview. Cooley was known for helping startups get off the ground. The conventional wisdom was that as those companies grew, they would graduate to one of the elite New York law firms for their biggest deals and courtroom battles.
To keep clients from the garage to the boardroom, as Conroy put it, Cooley needed to expand. It opened new offices and built out its litigation and capital markets practices. The firm also spent years courting Wall Street banks, says Proffitt, so that when a company asked which law firm to hire for its IPO, Cooley would make its shortlist.
Today, its client roster reads like a Kiplinger roundup of hot tech stocks: Nvidia, Uber, Snowflake, and Zoom, to name a few listings it worked on. Since 2016, Cooley has advised issuers on 183 IPOs that raised nearly $59 billion, making it the second-most active firm by deal count after Latham, according to Deal Point Data. Proffitt wouldn't discuss reports that Cooley has landed OpenAI's IPO work.
For 16 years, Conroy pushed Cooley toward what he calls Big Law's "winner's circle." Proffitt's job is to get it there.
Rachael Wright for BI
Her strategy starts with making Cooley move more like the tech companies it represents.
Proffitt recruited David Wang, a former lawyer turned legal technology executive, with an ambitious mandate. She didn't just want to make Cooley's lawyers more productive, Wang said in an interview. She wanted to change how clients interact with them altogether.
Earlier this year, Cooley launched a tool with the startup Legora that lets Y Combinator founders review common contracts without calling a lawyer. OpenAI helped it build a tool for Cooley's lawyers to prepare paperwork for companies going public. Next, Cooley is working with Google on an AI agent that scans documents for confidential information before they're filed in court, then suggests redactions for lawyers to review.
There's something almost cannibalistic about a law firm building software that could eat into its own billable hours. But Cooley sees a bigger risk in letting someone else do it. In-house legal teams are increasingly using chatbots to take the first crack at work they would otherwise send to outside counsel. A new breed of "AI-native" law firms is promising cheaper, faster services.
Big Law does not want to be caught flatfooted. Firms are throwing money at startups like Harvey and Legora, and increasingly, they're building their own technology. Kirkland has committed $500 million to proprietary software, starting with a platform for private equity fundraising built with Palantir. Latham bought its own Nvidia servers so it can customize models in-house. Like Cooley, Wilson Sonsini has self-service tools that let companies handle basic legal work.
For Proffitt, the danger isn't lost billable hours. It's the missed connections. The scrappy startup that needs a contract reviewed today might need help closing an acquisition later. But if the bots take care of the small stuff, Cooley could miss its chance to build the relationship.
Proffitt says Cooley must find new ways to connect with clients. Putting technology in their hands is one option, even if it means giving away a little of the work.
"When you need the next thing that matters, the thing that you don't trust to put into the machine," she says, "how do I ensure that you want to talk to our team?"
The firm is also rethinking its own structure for the new era. Wang now leads Cooley AI, a wholly owned subsidiary designed to operate at something closer to startup speed. The separate company gives his team more freedom to hire engineers and put new technology through its paces, he says, without getting bogged down in the parent firm's bureaucracy.
The irony, Proffitt says, is that all this technology could leave lawyers with more time for the human stuff. Lawyers may visit their clients more. Talk through thorny decisions. Drop in on the strategy session to learn how their advice fits into a client's business.
Keeping those relationships alive might require a little more old-fashioned schmoozing. When I asked Proffitt whether the answer was throwing great parties, she didn't entirely disagree. "Everyone loves a party," she says.
Proffitt doesn't pretend to have a crystal ball. She has ideas, though.
The billable hour? Not dead yet. She expects law firms to offer clients a menu of pricing options, from hourly rates to flat fees and outcome-based pricing.
Hiring slowdowns at the junior level? "Too early to tell," she says.
The apprenticeship model? That gets trickier. If software can write first drafts and spot issues, how will young lawyers get the practice they need? Proffitt says Cooley is exploring ways for associates to sharpen their skills on simulated legal matters, starting with AI-powered mock depositions.
Proffitt came up in an era when canceled dinners and all-nighters were a badge of honor. She's betting that the next generation won't need quite so many of them to become great lawyers. Her test will come a decade from now, when today's junior associates are ready to make partner.
If Cooley has found a better way to teach them, perhaps the old model won't be missed. If it hasn't, no amount of AI can make up the difference.
Melia Robinson is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, where she writes about how artificial intelligence is changing the legal industry.
Para arrendar uma casa na região da capital portuguesa, os valores começam nos 600 euros, 65% do salário mínimo. Já na Cidade Invicta as rendas dispararam quase 80% nos últimos cinco anos.
Virginia Zapater, una joven que vive en Oliva (Valencia), está atrapada junto a su familia en su casa esperando a ser rescatada, víctima de la DANA Adam, que ha provocado fuertes lluvias en la Comunidad Valenciana. A través de su cuenta de X ha compartido una imagen en la que aparece junto a su madre y su perro, cubiertas en mantas, y alertando de que están ya “al borde de la hipotermia”.
“Estamos mi madre y yo en la terraza, mi padre no puede salir de casa por la cantidad de agua que hay. “Estas son mis llamadas al 112 y aquí no viene ni dios”, ha escrito, junto a una imagen de las llamadas que ha realizado al número de Emergencias desde las siete de la mañana. La noche ha sido larga. Ya ayer por la noche Virginia comentó que en Oliva estaba lloviendo “con una fuerza y un viento que no había visto en su vida”.
Estamos mi madre y yo en la terraza, mi padre no puede salir de casa de la cantidad de agua que hay. Estás son mis llamadas al 112 y aquí No viene ni dios! @generalitat @apuntnoticies @sextaNoticias @A3Noticias https://t.co/CYY2M4MNBR
— virginia zapater (@nikitakd) October 19, 2026
Horas después, avisaba: “Oliva ahora mismo está dentro de un huracán. Es la peor noche de mi vida, sin ninguna duda. Solo rezo para que pare lo antes posible, por favor”. Han pasado ya más de cinco horas desde que publicaba este mensaje y sigue esperando.
“Estamos esperando a la UME o bomberos para que nos puedan sacar de casa. Esto es lo peor que he vivido en mi vida”, ha sentenciado. También ha compartido un vídeo de su casa que se ve completamente inundada. En las imágenes, aparece ella andando, con las zapatillas de estar por casa sumergidas y el pijama.
Y así está mi casa. @apuntnoticies @apuntoratge @A3Noticias @sextaNoticias #Oliva #Valencia #DanaAdam https://t.co/U0J6JtgqJC
— virginia zapater (@nikitakd) October 19, 2026
Y mientras tanto, cerca de 15 helicópteros participan este lunes en el rescate de decenas de personas afectadas por las fuertes lluvias registradas en municipios del litoral sur de Valencia y el litoral norte de Alicante, donde se acumularon más de 700 litros por metro cuadrado en 24 horas. Aunque el nivel de alerta meteorológica bajó, la situación de peligro continúa.
Así lo ha informadop el conseller de Emergencias, Juan Carlos Valderrama, en una comparecencia junto a la delegada del Gobierno en la Comunitat Valenciana, Pilar Bernabé, y el presidente de la Generalitat, Juanfran Pérez Llorca. Este último ha pedido “muchísima paciencia” a las personas afectadas y aseguró que se trabaja “para llegar lo antes posible”.
En el operativo participan siete helicópteros de rescate, uno de coordinación, uno de reconocimiento y búsqueda, y seis de transporte de personal y apoyo logístico, según se detalló en la comparecencia. Las autoridades insistieron en que la población permanezca confinada ante una “situación meteorológica extraordinaria” que no afectaba a esas comarcas desde hace tiempo.
El presidente del Gobierno ha anunciado que el Consejo de Ministros aprobará este martes un paquete de 45 millones de euros para cofinanciar “casi” 2.000 nuevas plazas en pisos compartidos para universitarios con zonas comunes de las que pueda disfrutar toda la comunidad; aunque Pedro Sánchez los ha descrito como “residencias”. Anteriormente, el Gobierno cifró el proyecto en 1.525 plazas. Encontrar alojamiento se convierte en una odisea por la escasa y cara oferta de residencias y colegios mayores, los precios del alquiler disparados y la competencia de los pisos turísticos. Por ello, el techo de los universitarios se ha convertido en una de las reivindicaciones de la acampada por una vivienda justa en la Puerta del Sol.
Login
