❌

Normal view

Jewish groups clash over whether EU antisemitism envoy should influence Israel policy, as controversial von Schnurbein goes back to Berlin

23 October 2026 at 14:49

Two leading Jewish groups want the EU’s next antisemitism tsar to also brief diplomats on foreign policy – despite the controversy it caused the last one, Katharina von Schnurbein.

“EU external decisions have direct consequences for Jews living in Europe. Diplomats should hear from the person who sees those consequences every day,” said Pinchas Goldschmidt, who heads the Conference of European Rabbis (CER) in Munich, Germany.

The European Jewish Congress (EJC) in Brussels also told EUobserver: “The [EU antisemitism] coordinator should ensure that this objective is systematically reflected in all relevant EU policies, including external action and foreign policy.”

They spoke as von Schnurbein prepared to leave her EU post after 10 years to become a German “federal government commissioner for Jewish life in Germany and the fight against antisemitism” on 28 October.

The 53-year-old German baroness was highly active at events in EU capitals, had three staff, and travelled to Israel, Serbia, Switzerland, and the US.

She also worked next door to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and had close ties with the Israeli government.

This article continues, but the full version is available only to EUobserver.com subscribers. Visit account.euobserver.com/membership

New research reveals “striking challenges” facing “Brexit couples”

23 October 2026 at 14:07

 

Post-Brexit changes to EU citizens’ rights have had a detrimental impact on the mental health of those involved and their families, according to a new report.

It says those affected have had their lives “turned upside down” by the demands of the rules.

Some even reportedly contemplated taking their own lives because of the “striking” challenges faced by so-called “Brexit couples”.

These are some of the findings of exhaustive new research in the UK surrounding the end of decades of free movement between the UK and the EU.

Brexit couples are deemed to be romantic or marital partners made up of a British citizen (or UK resident) and an EU, EEA, or Swiss citizen who must navigate the UK’s post-Brexit immigration system to live together in the UK.

Before Brexit, UK-EU couples could live together easily in the UK under EU free movement laws but, after Brexit, EU partners without EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) status lost that automatic right.

The Brexit Couples project was conducted by Katharine Charsley, Nicole Hoellerer and Katie Cross of Bristol University, Helena Wray and Jasmin El Shewy, both of Exeter University. The results were presented during a meeting of a UK parliamentary group concerned with EU citizens’ rights  earlier this week. The session brought together researchers, MPs and people with direct experience of the challenges faced by “Brexit couples”.

The discussion was an opportunity to hear personal testimonies, examine emerging research and consider what further action may be needed to support affected families.

Helena Wray, Professor of Migration Law at the University of Exeter and  Katharine Charsley, Professor of Migration Studies at the University of Bristol shared insights from the project. Their findings are particularly timely on the eve of a key EU/UK summit in Brussels in November when new efforts are expected to be made at the much-vaunted EU/UK “Re-set” in relations between the two sides.

Afterwards, Prof Charsley told this site, “There is a dramatic contrast between the EU free movement enjoyed by UK-EU couples and families before Brexit, and the UK’s family migration system, one of the most restrictive in the world.

“UK-EU couples who want to start their lives together in the UK and families wanting to return after living in the EU often find their plans scuppered by a high and rigid minimum income threshold, extortionate visa fees and other costs, and an over-complex application process.

“Even for those who successfully apply for a visa, the experience is highly stressful, impacting on relationships and financial and mental wellbeing,” added Prof Charsley.

The study points out that 50 years of free movement between the UK and the EU ended on 31 December 2020, when the Brexit transition period expired.

EU citizens already living in the UK could usually preserve their residence rights through the EU Settlement Scheme but, since then, EU citizens wanting to live in the UK must comply with what the study calls the UK’s “highly restrictive migration rules.”

The Brexit Couples project tracked the experiences of members of the first cohort of EU citizens seeking to enter the UK after Brexit as the spouses and partners of British citizens and residents and who therefore had to go through the visa system.

The authors state, “The position of this group was barely considered during the Brexit negotiations even though UK-EU relationships were commonplace, are likely to continue to develop after Brexit, and UK-EU couples living overseas will continue to seek to return.”

They add, “The UK’s partner migration rules are among the most restrictive, complex and expensive in the world.”

The study says that the contrast between the position under free movement before Brexit and the immigration rules after Brexit “is striking and became more so” after the minimum income requirement for UK sponsors increased from £18,600 to £29,000 pain 2024.

The project report, called “Brexit Couples: UK-EU couples in the British immigration system”, showed that, after a “slow start”, the number of UK-EU couples applying under the partner migration rules has started to increase “significantly.”

The researchers interviewed more than 50 UK-EU couples at various points of the partner migration process: some were considering an application, others had made a successful or unsuccessful application, and some could not meet the requirements or had decided not to apply.

“Having lived through an era of almost unrestricted movement between the UK and the rest of the EU, many were shocked to be now treated as migrants,” the report says.

“This led to reflection on who a ‘migrant’ is, and the political and social meanings of the term.”

“Some interviewees hoped for legal recognition of their position as European citizens while, for others, there was a new appreciation of the global and racialised inequalities caused by border controls,” states the 75-page study.

It goes on, “Our statistical analysis shows that UK-EU couples living in the UK before Brexit were on average more educated and more likely to be in professional or managerial occupations than couples in which both partners were born in the UK.

“These characteristics were also present in our sample. yet our research found that they all experienced the partner visa process as difficult, complex, expensive, and stressful.”

The authors say, “As we demonstrate, participants had their lives turned upside down by the demands of the rules and some parents were separated for months from children including, sometimes, when they could meet the substantive requirements of the rules but were caught by errors or inflexibility.”

“The impact on them was severe and included financial and career implications, mental health challenges for themselves and their children, and strains on their relationship.”

The study quotes the EU partner of a UK national saying, “It takes a mental toll on you. Not everyone is going to be equipped to deal with it very well… The anxiety of it is intense… There are people who… are going to have a nervous breakdown.”

A UK partner, suffering from cancer, spoke of the application process, saying, “Throughout the whole damn process that visa was eating away at me, just like you’d imagine the cancer would, and affected my sense of wellbeing… It was just too much, it was just so overwhelming.”

The study says, “Some participants described serious mental health impacts from their engagement in this demanding, stressful and extended process. Several reported anxiety and depression, and one applicant unable to move to the UK to care for her seriously ill partner told us that she had contemplated suicide.”

She is quoted as saying, “I just wanted it all to end… I just got depressed and it got worse and worse. At some point I just planned, in great detail, the way I wanted to end my life because of this… I still haven’t recovered entirely from that.”

The study continues, “Our findings are consistent with existing research which shows the damage caused to families and individuals by the UK’s partner migration system.”

The project, state its authors, “shows that even a population which has advantages compared to many other national groups — being relatively well educated, geographically close and able to make visa free visits — experience the system as extremely challenging.”

“British citizens and settled residents will continue to meet and fall in love with EU citizens despite Brexit.

“Building a new relationship with the EU is a major challenge for post-Brexit governments. The current partner migration rules do not meet that challenge as they are too complex, difficult and expensive. The rules also affect British citizens in relationships with non-nationals from across the globe.

“The contrast between EU free movement and the UK’s immigration system sheds light on the extreme restrictiveness of the immigration regime. Our recommendations aim to remedy injustice and hardship for both UK-EU couples, and a much wider range of families.”

Several recommendations are made surrounding future immigration rules, the application process and costs.

The study’s authors want the UK government to reduce the minimum income requirement for applicants, provide and “more flexible” support, increase length of the initial visa to avoid costs and also to “recognise the importance of visits for maintaining relationships” particularly for UK-EU couples for whom European travel is relatively straightforward even if they cannot live together.

  • Main Image: Brexit Couples project and Michael Grieve (Strange Fish Designs).

Andy Burnham says he has emergency stockpile of beans, soup and Twiglets

PM’s revelation follows launch of advice for households to have enough water and food to get by in civil emergency

Andy Burnham has stockpiles of beans, soup and Twiglets in case of a civil emergency, he has said, adding that a new government campaign was not reason for panic buying.

The prime minister was questioned on his domestic supply situation after the Be Ready campaign advised households to have enough bottled water and long-life food to keep going in case of an emergency, such as one caused by a weather event or cyber-attack.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Martin Lee/Alamy

© Photograph: Martin Lee/Alamy

© Photograph: Martin Lee/Alamy

Hijab ban in Azerbaijan raise fears over religious freedom

23 October 2026 at 11:39

"I want to study. I have my hijab on, but they are not letting me study. I have a right to study," a distressed Azerbaijani schoolgirl was filmed saying in a video posted online, passionately advocating for her right to attend school like other children while wearing an Islamic headscarf. 

Across Azerbaijan, pupils and teachers wearing hijabs have reportedly been denied entry to schools since new regulations were implemented earlier this month. 

The restrictions have prompted emotional scenes captured in online footage, with schoolgirls seen in tears and students looking on in distress as a visibly veiled teacher was dismissed from school premises. 

The decision, approved last month, has sparked outrage both domestically and internationally, with human rights groups such as Amnesty International describing the restrictions as discriminatory. 

Speaking to The New Arab, Amnesty International’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia director, Marie Struthers, emphasised that excluding pupils and teachers who wear the hijab from schools "violates their rights to education, and the freedoms of religion and expression."

School exclusions

The restrictions have also sparked protests across Azerbaijan, with local reports documenting demonstrations against the headscarf rules, involving girls wearing Islamic headscarves and boys joining their classmates in solidarity. 

On Monday, the Ministry of Internal Affairs said it had detained 37 people for disrupting public order during the protests. 

Struthers also called for the release of those detained.  

"The international community should call upon Azerbaijani authorities to: reverse these discriminatory restrictions and ensure that affected pupils and teachers can return to school; immediately and unconditionally release anyone detained solely for peacefully exercising their rights; and respect the right to peaceful protest and all human rights," she said. 

Struthers cited recent Amnesty reporting on the detention of Shahizyar Huseynova, the wife of Azerbaijani Muslim activist Aga Huseynov. 

She was reportedly arrested last Wednesday after protesting outside a school in Baku, where their daughter had been refused entry the previous day. 

"According to [Huseynov], she has been detained for four months, and the charges against her have not been provided."

Struthers also cited other reports the organisation received, including one about activist Matanat Turan (Mahmarzayeva), who is affiliated with the Azerbaijan People’s Front Party (APFP). 

On Sunday, a court in the Azerbaijani city of Sumgayit reportedly imposed a two-month preventive measure on Turan after she protested against the headscarf restrictions in Khirdalan. 

She added: "Ilkin Huseynov, an activist who had launched a free online platform connecting volunteer teachers with children excluded from school, including for wearing hijabs, went missing on 14 October after leaving his Baku home accompanied by unidentified people."

Growing protests amid a regional fallout

Smuthers’ urgent calls reflect concerns voiced across the country, as the controversial ban has escalated into a regional dispute, with ally Turkey declaring its firm opposition to Baku’s decision. 

Oktay Saral, an adviser to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, criticised the restrictions on hijabs in Azerbaijani schools, prompting President Ilham Aliyev’s ruling party to accuse Turkish figures of interfering in Azerbaijan’s domestic affairs. 

Ankara’s condemnation of the hijab ban has prompted a fierce backlash from the Azerbaijani government, which has barred 31 Turkish nationals from entering the country, including Fatih Erbakan, leader of Turkey’s New Welfare Party. 

Caught in the middle of the public feud, however, are Azerbaijan’s women and girls, whose lives are being affected by the new school regulations in a country where 96 per cent of the population identifies as Muslim.  

Rafig Shahbazov, a Georgia-based journalist covering developments in Azerbaijan, told TNA that there was currently “no publicly available comprehensive official figure showing how many students or teachers have been affected nationwide” by the restrictions. 

He said there was also no comprehensive information on how many schools had implemented the rules, how many pupils had missed classes or whether the restrictions were being enforced consistently across the country. 

However, Shahbazov stressed that continuing reports of hijab-wearing pupils and teachers being turned away from schools suggested that "the issue has not been confined to one school or a single district."

"The first protest videos I encountered came from Jalilabad, after which reports and footage emerged from Baku and surrounding villages, as well as Sumqayit and other locations," Shahbazov added. 

"Baku’s School No. 69 and the school in Mollaoba village in Masalli district are among the locations mentioned in reporting and discussions surrounding the restrictions."

Shahbazov also noted that, based on publicly available evidence, students, teachers, and parents responded in various ways, including expressing solidarity with girls and women who wear the hijab. 

"Some students have continued to attend school wearing hijabs despite the restrictions, while others have reportedly been prevented from entering classrooms," Shahbazov told The New Arab.

In some locations, male classmates have reportedly refused to attend lessons in solidarity with girls who were denied access.

Protesters have used slogans such as ‘Freedom for the hijab’ and ‘Let the girls go to school’, framing the issue as one of access to education as well as religious freedom. 

"Parents have also challenged the restrictions. Some have protested outside schools after their daughters were reportedly refused entry," Shahbazov added. 

"For many families, the central concern is not simply whether a particular item of clothing is permitted, but whether girls should have to choose between practising their faith and continuing their education. Teachers have expressed concern about the impact on their professional lives and personal religious choices."

Protests involving schoolchildren are unusual in Azerbaijan. The demonstrations have also prompted a social media campaign, with protest footage spreading online. 

However, local users have since reported disruptions to access to Instagram and TikTok in the country, raising questions about the authorities’ response to the growing controversy. 

Internet monitoring groups have also documented restrictions on access to the platforms, but Azerbaijani authorities have not explained the reported disruptions. 

Legal questions

The growing controversy follows a series of legal changes, beginning with amendments to Azerbaijan’s general education law that reaffirmed the principle of secular education and required pupils and teachers to comply with school dress codes. 

Subsequent regulations prohibited additional clothing deemed to disrupt the standard uniform or conflict with secular education. 

Although the school rules do not explicitly mention the hijab, they have since been interpreted in ways that restrict the wearing of Islamic headscarves. 

Emin Abbasov, an Azerbaijani human rights lawyer and chair of the Independent Lawyers Network (ILN), told The New Arab that the secularism requirement introduced under the new regulations "amounts to a ban on expressing religious belief through clothing in state schools."

He added: "Wearing religious clothing is a protected manifestation of belief which is a core part of freedom of religion both in national and international law. Restrictions must therefore have a sufficiently clear legal basis, pursue a legitimate aim and be necessary and proportionate. A general reference to secularism does not, by itself, establish that excluding pupils or teachers wearing a hijab meets these requirements."

Abbasov continued: "The vague requirement to dress ‘in accordance with secularism’ also raises questions about foreseeability and the scope for arbitrary enforcement and its impacts."

The ILN chief also cited reports by his organisation, which found that pupils and teachers wearing hijabs were reportedly denied entry to schools across Azerbaijan since October 12, sparking warnings that such restrictions raise serious concerns about freedom of religion, equality and access to education. 

"The justifications appeared in state officials and pro-governmental media refer to social equality, secular education and protecting girls from religious coercion require careful scrutiny," Abbasov told The New Arab. 

"However, protecting children from coercion is a legitimate concern, as is ensuring neutrality and secularity in education, but the authorities failed to demonstrate the problem of coercion and alternative — less intrusive measures such as education at schools on secularism, increased civil society role in promoting secularity, etc." 

He added: "Excluding a girl from school because of her clothing risks punishing the very child the state claims to protect. It can interrupt her education, deepen isolation and undermine her future independence." 

Abbasov argued that an outright ban "is a clear intervention in the right to believe of citizens," adding that it also infringes on the right to education and, for teachers, constitutes “a breach of employment rights."

The head of the ILN cited constitutional protections and international law safeguarding freedom of belief and the right to education. 

He added that Azerbaijan’s government must, under both international law and the country’s constitution, adhere to key legal principles, including necessity and proportionality. 

Rights at risk 

In response to the backlash, Azerbaijani authorities have blamed Iranian influence for stirring division in the country — in addition to alleged Turkish influence. 

More ethnic Azerbaijanis live in Iran than in Azerbaijan itself. 

Azerbaijan’s State Service for Special Communications and Information Security alleged that a "foreign hacker group" had attacked more than 100 state websites on the night of 13 October. 

Abbasov criticised the government’s "divisive narratives," describing the accusations of foreign influence involving Iran, Turkey and people of Arab backgrounds as "absolutely unacceptable and very harmful."  

He warned that such rhetoric risked deepening isolation and perpetuating harm against the women and girls affected by the ban. 

"From what we see from the protests, mostly by the secular parts of Azerbaijan, supporting religious people or the young girls and women wearing hijabs, it shows that society is not convinced that it faces any religious fundamentalism or any harm," Abbasov told The New Arab. 

"The Azerbaijani government now wants to divide society between secular and religious people. And it needs somehow a foreign influence, a foreign enemy and new threats in society in order to govern or to continue governing Azeris with coercive and repressive methods that society does not want to continue." 

He continued: "There are no threats; there is no reason to take any measure for protecting secularity in Azerbaijan." 

The New Arab contacted Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Science and Education for comment but had not received a response by the time of publication. 

However, Azerbaijani officials have continued to defend the ban in public statements.  

MP Nigar Arpadarai alleged that children did not choose to wear the hijab themselves but were influenced by their families. 

"A child has no freedom to choose a religion. This is a conscious prerogative of adults," she told the 1news.az website. 

After decades of Soviet rule, Azerbaijan emerged as one of the most secular states in the Muslim world.  

Under President Ilham Aliyev, the country has maintained a poor human rights record, with the government repeatedly targeting journalists, activists and independent politicians. 

Human rights organisations have long accused Aliyev’s administration of intensifying its crackdown on freedom of speech.

Assiah Hamed is a staff writer at The New Arab

Chaos in Albania: Popular struggle or color revolution?

By: A A
23 October 2026 at 11:24

The protesters cannot be dismissed as members of some particular social segment, being instead a cross-party movement from all sectors of society.

Join us on Telegram, X, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

Albania has returned to the news in recent days, with protests that eventually culminated in the destruction of the Ministry of Education, but the process that led to this chaos began some months ago because of the negotiations surrounding the construction of a gigantic luxury resort in the country, in a megaproject led by Affinity Partners, owned by Jared Kushner, the Zionist agent who is Donald Trump’s son-in-law and who occasionally acts as his ad hoc diplomat. Alongside Kushner in this project, there was also capital from three Arab petro-monarchies and local investors.

The first point of dissent, the spark, so to speak, of this fire, was the fact that the project would be built in an environmental protection area, in the marshy wetland zone of Albania, which is considered a natural paradise where flamingos, pelicans and other animals nest, some of them endangered. Nevertheless, Kushner obtained authorization from Edi Rama’s government to go ahead with the project, as well as the classification of strategic investor, which allows him to bypass local regulations.

The project itself is expected to reach the sum of 4.7 billion dollars and would be implemented on the island of Sazan (once a military base), on the island of Vjosa-Narta and on the island of Zvernec, which also have defensive characteristics. Kushner supposedly had the “idea” and “discovered” Sazan while traveling on the yacht of his friend Nathan Rothschild, a context in which he also met the Albanian prime minister.

Kushner’s other partners at Affinity Partners are Luis Videgaray, former Minister of Finance of Mexico, and Elad Gil, an Israeli investor, and the project involves the construction of hotels, marinas and private villas, in an effort that seems to point toward a “Dubai-ization” of Albania.

Since June, therefore, when these shady deals were revealed, Albanian citizens began going to the streets to protest, with slogans (“Albania is not for sale”) against Washington and Tel Aviv and calling for Kushner to be made persona non grata. The protests had already been following protests organized in February and March over corruption accusations against Edi Rama, as well as the fact that the Albanian prime minister had begun a campaign to encourage Israelis to move to Albania.

What has been most worrying for the Albanian government is the fact that these protesters cannot be dismissed as members of some particular social segment, being instead a cross-party movement from all sectors of society. And the protests continued, intermittently, until now in October, which points to a permanent dissatisfaction that is difficult to stifle.

The most recent protests are more focused on youth and on new corruption scandals, problems in education and the government’s attempts to “force” entry into the European Union, but the issue of Jared Kushner’s luxury resort remains on the agenda.

It is possible to analyze the case from the conspiracy-minded angle of “Epstein Island,” especially considering the Rothschild family’s ties to Epstein and to Kushner, but perhaps a more interesting angle points to the geopolitics of the Mediterranean and the power project of the State of Israel.

Israel has been expanding its activities in this area and expanding its presence. Israeli investors, for example, have been mass-acquiring properties in Cyprus and in the Greek port city of Kalamata. When we add up these ventures targeting properties in Cyprus, Greece and now Albania, we clearly perceive that there is an eastern Mediterranean focus in Israeli parastatal business activities. It is striking that these always involve islands and ports, which points specifically to the construction of a thalassocratic strategy on the part of the State of Israel.

Also striking is a specific theme of Albanian political-social reality, which is the fact that it has become common practice for Albanian investors, after being legitimized as strategic investors to secure approval for development projects, to resell their shareholdings for negligible amounts to other, more obscure actors. In many cases, we are talking here about “straw man” schemes used by the Albanian mafia. That would not naturally be the case for Kushner or the Arab petro-monarchies, but the suspicion raised affects the Albanian partners in this investment.

Perhaps that is why the violent repression of the protests has drawn less attention than elsewhere. It appears to be the authentic eruption of popular dissatisfaction in a country that for decades has been victimized by corrupt leaders, highly dangerous mafias and brutal terrorists.

Detective raped by fellow officer David Carrick calls on Met chief to resign

23 October 2026 at 10:42

Linda Williams, who was attacked in 2004, says force’s handling of her case was ‘like being raped all over again’

A detective who was raped by the former Scotland Yard officer David Carrick has called for the head of the Metropolitan police to resign, saying the handling of her case was “like being raped all over again”.

Linda Williams, 60, who has waived her right to anonymity, was attacked by Carrick in 2004. She launched a legal case against the Met for failing to protect her against the serial rapist, and has now settled for an undisclosed six-figure sum without the force admitting liability.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Chris J Ratcliffe/Reuters

© Photograph: Chris J Ratcliffe/Reuters

© Photograph: Chris J Ratcliffe/Reuters

Putting the clocks back this Sunday – yet millions of Europeans don’t want to

23 October 2026 at 10:38

Europeans made their preference clear. Parliament voted. So why are we still changing the clocks?

On Sunday (25 October), Europeans will once again turn their clocks back by one hour. The familiar ritual will again raise the same question: did the European Union not decide years ago to end seasonal clock changes?

The question entered the European agenda largely from the bottom up.

Citizens repeatedly contacted and petitioned the European Parliament, raising concerns about health, sleep disruption and the continuing usefulness of changing the clocks twice a year.

A citizens’ initiative presented to the Finnish Parliament in 2017 gave the issue further momentum. Finland could not end the practice alone because it was regulated at EU level.

On 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the EU Commission to assess the existing directive and, if necessary, propose its revision.

84% public support for ending clock changes…

The commission subsequently launched a public consultation. It received approximately 4.6 million responses from citizens, the highest number ever recorded for an EU consultation at that time. Among those who participated, 84 percent supported ending the twice-yearly clock changes.

The consultation was not a referendum, and participation varied considerably between member states. Nevertheless, millions of Europeans sent a clear political message.

Jean-Claude Juncker highlighted the issue in his 2018 State of the Union address. Shortly afterwards, the commission proposed ending seasonal clock changes while allowing each member state to choose permanent summer time or permanent standard time.

…and MEPs agree

In March 2019, the European Parliament approved the proposal in plenary by 410 votes to 192, with 51 abstentions. The final clock change was expected in 2021.

Yet 2021 came and went, and Europeans continued adjusting their clocks every March and October.

Parliament has not reversed its position, and the commission has not formally withdrawn its proposal. The file remains blocked because member state governments have never agreed on a common position in the Council.

No simple solution for 27 states

Ending the clock change sounds simple until governments must decide what replaces it. Should countries remain permanently on summer time or standard time? What happens if neighbouring countries make different choices? How would a patchwork of time zones affect transport, aviation, trade and the single market?

These are legitimate questions.

A poorly coordinated decision could create new problems while solving the old one. Some governments also requested a more detailed assessment of the consequences. The pandemic and the crises that followed then pushed the issue further down the political agenda.

However, the crisis cannot explain indefinite inaction. Eight years after the Commission presented its proposal, the Council has still not adopted a position. Without it, negotiations with Parliament cannot move towards a final agreement.

This is where a practical question about clocks becomes a problem of democracy, accountability and political communication.

Citizens were encouraged to participate. Millions did. Parliament responded adequately. The commission presented the consultation as evidence that Europe was listening. Its president announced that clock-changing would stop, and Parliament endorsed the proposal with a clear majority.

Then the process got  stuck.

Twice a year, Europeans are reminded of this promise, but receive little to no explanation about who is blocking progress, which governments support which option or how the disagreement might be resolved.

Simply saying that “the EU failed” would, however, hide who has the concrete political responsibility. The EU is a complex, multilevel decision-making system in which responsibility is shared among different institutions and member state governments. Parliament adopted its position, while national capitals failed to agree in the council.

Those governments should explain their positions instead of allowing “Brussels” to absorb the blame like often happens, for their collective indecision.

The European Commission also has certain responsibility because her proposed legislation left the most difficult question, the choice of permanent time, to individual countries. 

In any case, the EU risks turning, or did turn,  an example of successful citizen agenda-setting into an example of participatory failure.

The issue may not be Europe’s most urgent challenge right now, but credibility and a positive image is also built through implementation of citizens’ demands such as this one.

People notice when a widely announced change does not happen, especially when it impacts directly and negatively their daily life. They also notice when nobody explains why.

Member state governments should state publicly whether they favour permanent summer time, permanent standard time or retaining the current system. The council should put the issue back on its agenda and strive to achieve an agreement.

And if this is not possible, Europeans deserve a clear explanation why their participation led nowhere.

Easy fix for Europe’s chaos? Stop fueling war against Russia

By: A A
23 October 2026 at 10:23

European leaders have to find the resolve to stop fueling the war against Russia and engage in diplomacy with Moscow.

Join us on Telegram, X, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

There is a straightforward way to alleviate the social chaos sweeping Europe, as well as the war in Ukraine threatening to engulf the continent. It’s an easy fix – and it’s not shoving more white powder up Zelensky’s nose paid for by European taxpayers.

European leaders just have to find the resolve to stop fueling the war against Russia and engage in diplomacy with Moscow to establish an all-encompassing security architecture (as Russia had proposed back in December 2021). That, in turn, will salvage European nations from unsustainable debt driven by militarism and propping up a kleptocracy in Kiev, whose puppet leader is obviously degenerating from cocaine addiction.

Across Europe, cities are looking like battle zones with mass protests, public tensions, buildings burning, shops looted, riot police baton-charging crowds, and masked mobs running amok. France is bearing the brunt of street violence, but so too are Italy, Belgium, and others. Spain and Portugal are seeing their cities turned into tent camps in protests against a lack of affordable housing.

In the turmoil, it is easy to lose sight of the basic problem. People en masse are suffering from economic privation. Why can’t their individual and social needs be met in an efficient and effective manner? Why is there seemingly no money to fix broken societies?

Curfews are declared in Paris and cities across France while Italy moves to deploy soldiers in Milan to restore a semblance of order. Thousands of arrests have been made in recent days. Revolution is in the air, and so too is the sinister possibility of supposedly democratic governments flipping to become police-state dictatorships.

In this volatile, explosive situation, it is tempting to look for scapegoats.

French President Emmanuel Macron goes on national television to denounce “ultra-left groups” who he says are mindlessly trying to destroy France.

Even American President Donald Trump weighs in to claim that a once great nation (France) is being “conquered by immigrants, jihadists and communists.”

There were also predictable accusations in Western media that Russia is fomenting the unrest across Europe.

Another misdirection is to portray the European governments as cash-strapped and unable to deliver relief from the cost-of-living crisis and deteriorating public services. The governments and media tend to define the problem as one of balancing fiscal bookkeeping, overspending on social welfare, aging populations, or some other demographic factor.

European nations, we are told by pundits, are in massive debt and under pressure from bond markets to ramp up austerity by slashing public spending. The challenge for France and other governments is that they “no longer have the fiscal room to simply throw more money at these problems,” as one commentator put it.

Another commentator lamented that: “Hamstrung governments seem to have no answer to the public’s furious demands, making further discontent likely.”

In other words, we are told, “there is no alternative to austerity,” to paraphrase the late British leader Margaret Thatcher.

But that premise deceptively tells only part of the picture. The crucial part omitted is that the fiscal crunch of European governments is largely caused by the reckless funnelling of money to fuel the war in Ukraine and inordinately build up their own military forces. That wasteful misallocation of resources is “justified” by relentlessly and absurdly demonizing Russia as a “threat to Europe”. The news media play the role of amplifying the propaganda.

The media do not question, never mind expose, how Europe’s economies have been exhausted by a proxy war agenda against Russia that has involved cutting themselves off from Russian affordable energy, the lifeblood of industry, and on top of that racking up hundreds of billions in debt by propping up the endemically corrupt Kiev regime.

That regime is losing the war against Russia as it runs out of conscripts for the meat grinder. Yet, European governments are fixated on keeping the futile war going with ever more funding of the regime.

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top diplomat, dissembled this week by claiming that “Ukraine would have surrendered a long time ago if not for European support”. This is a tacit admission that the EU and Britain are fueling the war.

She also accused the Trump administration of forcing Ukraine into a surrender. In her soulless view, diplomacy and peace are sneered at as surrender.

European societies are deprived of financial resources for vital public services and infrastructure all in the fraudulent name of “defending” Ukraine in a war that has gone on for nearly five years. There is no end in sight if the European leaders have their way.

The European Union’s unelected bureaucracy has donated €90 billion to the Kiev regime for 2026 and 2027 alone, in addition to over €200 billion already allocated. This largesse is still not enough. The Zelensky dictatorship is calling for an extra €70 billion to be doled out, and the EU Russophobic elites are clamoring to oblige.

No wonder that European societies are visibly falling apart from underinvestment and widespread hardship from the soaring cost of living. The social implosion is a direct consequence of a policy of militarism and war, a policy that the Euro elites are running with impunity and unaccountability. That’s dictatorship by any definition.

The depiction of fiscally constrained and helpless European governments is an illusion. The constraint is not a natural condition of societies. It is the consequence of a deliberate, criminal policy of warmongering.

So spare us the scapegoating and misdirection. Spare us the curfews and calls for emergency police state powers to curb “hooligans and extremists.” That misdirection is playing into the hands of the ruling class, which has delegitimized itself by its sponsoring of war in Ukraine, its support for American aggression against Iran and Yemen, and its complicity in Israeli genocide in Gaza and Lebanon.

Contrary to the politicians and pundits claiming that there is “no easy fix” to the chaos erupting in Europe, there is. It is for the European governments to stop fueling the war in Ukraine and actually manage societies according to democratic needs.

However, that rational and feasible solution is probably out of reach under the prevailing political system. The elites in control of the system are incapable of overseeing any meaningful reform. They will not engage in diplomacy to find a peaceful settlement in Ukraine with Russia.

And so the outcome seems to be either they consolidate the emerging dictatorship and quash the legitimate social demands of the people, or the people will prevail by sweeping away the corrupt regimes that masquerade as “democratic”.

Boom in weight-loss drugs could lead to fall in beer sales, Heineken warns UK pubs

23 October 2026 at 11:33

World’s second largest brewer says use of drugs such as Wegovy can reduce desire to drink alcohol

• Business live – latest updates

Heineken has warned British bars and pubs that the boom in popularity of weight-loss drugs could lead to a fall in sales of beer and cider.

The world’s second-largest brewer sent a presentation to British hospitality customers earlier this month that said the use of GLP-1 medication – such as Ozempic and Wegovy – could reduce the desire to drink alcohol. This in turn could result in “fullness and fewer serves” of pints in pubs and bars, it added.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: william87/Getty Images/iStockphoto

© Photograph: william87/Getty Images/iStockphoto

© Photograph: william87/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Boom in weight-loss drugs could lead to fall in beer sales, Heineken warns UK pubs

23 October 2026 at 11:33

World’s second largest brewer says use of drugs such as Wegovy can reduce desire to drink alcohol

• Business live – latest updates

Heineken has warned British bars and pubs that the boom in popularity of weight-loss drugs could lead to a fall in sales of beer and cider.

The world’s second-largest brewer sent a presentation to British hospitality customers earlier this month that said the use of GLP-1 medication – such as Ozempic and Wegovy – could reduce the desire to drink alcohol. This in turn could result in “fullness and fewer serves” of pints in pubs and bars, it added.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: william87/Getty Images/iStockphoto

© Photograph: william87/Getty Images/iStockphoto

© Photograph: william87/Getty Images/iStockphoto

India slashes cost of cancer drugs after court rules mark-ups are ‘extortion’

Case filed in 2022 by patient unable to afford medicine leads to cap on drug prices for millions who face ruin if diagnosed

The Indian government has moved to reduce the price of cancer drugs after a retired bank clerk took her case to the supreme court.

From next month, 137 cancer drugs in India will be cheaper as the government tries to tackle the tragedy of poorer patients either forgoing treatment, selling land or falling into debt to meet the high cost of some medicines, which are making large profits for hospitals and pharmacists.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Rupendra Rawat/Alamy

© Photograph: Rupendra Rawat/Alamy

© Photograph: Rupendra Rawat/Alamy

Heat killed ‘staggering’ 50,000 people in Europe’s cities this summer, scientists warn

23 October 2026 at 05:01

People succumbed to heat at highest rates in Malta, Italy and Hungary, with health issues, loneliness and poverty exacerbating toll

Heat killed a record 50,000 people in European cities this summer, new research suggests, with scientists blaming climate breakdown for two in every three of the deaths.

Morgues and funeral homes filled with bodies from June to August as the heat added by planet-baking pollution cut short an extra 32,000 lives in urban areas, the researchers found. Hot days pushed vulnerable bodies into overdrive and warm nights prevented them from recovering.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

© Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

© Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

Heat killed ‘staggering’ 50,000 people in Europe’s cities this summer, scientists warn

23 October 2026 at 05:01

People succumbed to heat at highest rates in Malta, Italy and Hungary, with health issues, loneliness and poverty exacerbating toll

Heat killed a record 50,000 people in European cities this summer, new research suggests, with scientists blaming climate breakdown for two in every three of the deaths.

Morgues and funeral homes filled with bodies from June to August as the heat added by planet-baking pollution cut short an extra 32,000 lives in urban areas, the researchers found. Hot days pushed vulnerable bodies into overdrive and warm nights prevented them from recovering.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

© Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

© Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

Flu cases rise on west coast earlier than usual as US health experts encourage vaccine

23 October 2026 at 02:50

California flu test rate at 9.65%, higher than normal 1% rate for early October, amid mutation of H1N1 influenza A strain

Flu cases on the west coast are on the rise months earlier than normal, prompting US health experts to stress the importance of the annual vaccine.

Flu activity typically ramps up in December, hitting its peak in February. But this season has kicked into action earlier this year, with higher positive cases than normal recorded.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP

© Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP

© Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP

Delivery Robots Accused Of Scanning Customers’ Faces, Sharing Biometric Data

Cute little delivery robots rolling down the sidewalk turn into a Chucky horror movie as they grab your face with a video scan and other information about you when you retrieve your lunch (or whatever you ordered). All of the innocent bystanders are all scanned, too. Is the microphone always on, picking up all conversations along the route? You don’t need to wait for this court case to settle: don’t use delivery robots in the first place. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.

In a startling development that strikes at the heart of the burgeoning autonomous technology sector, several delivery robots are now facing serious allegations of scanning customers’ faces and harvesting biometric data. The accusations suggest that these automated machines, designed for convenience, may be functioning as mobile surveillance units, capturing highly sensitive personal information without explicit user consent.

The controversy centers on how these robots process visual data while navigating sidewalks and interacting with clients. While companies claim the cameras are strictly for navigation and obstacle avoidance, whistleblowers and privacy experts suggest that the software may be performing advanced facial mapping. This data, which is unique to every individual, could potentially be stored, analyzed, or even shared with third-party advertisers and data brokers.

Why This Matters

BozokMedia analysis shows that this incident marks a critical turning point in the debate over ‘surveillance capitalism.’ As autonomous robots become a common sight in urban environments, the line between helpful automation and intrusive monitoring becomes dangerously blurred. If biometric data is leaked or misused, the implications for individual security and identity theft are profound.

The integration of facial recognition into consumer-facing robotics without a robust legal framework is a ticking time bomb for digital privacy.

Legal experts are already examining whether current data protection laws, such as the GDPR in Europe or various state-level privacy acts in the US, are sufficient to handle the nuances of mobile robotic surveillance. The core issue lies in the ‘passive collection’ of data—where bystanders and customers are recorded simply by being in the vicinity of the robot.

Historical Background

The history of automated surveillance has evolved from stationary CCTV cameras to highly mobile, AI-driven devices. In previous decades, facial recognition was restricted to high-security government installations. Today, the rapid commercialization of AI has brought this technology into the streets, often outpacing the ability of lawmakers to regulate it effectively.

Did You Know?: Biometric data, such as facial geometry, is considered one of the most sensitive forms of personal information because, unlike a password, it cannot be changed if compromised.

As the industry moves forward, the pressure is mounting on tech giants to implement ‘privacy-by-design’ protocols. This would involve ensuring that visual data is processed locally on the device and immediately deleted, rather than being uploaded to a cloud server for long-term storage.

Read full story here…

Europe’s Student Protests Spark Debate Over the Muslim Brotherhood’s Influence 

22 October 2026 at 21:32

 

A wave of student protests has spread across several European countries in recent weeks, with France at its centre, where demonstrations over staff shortages, underfunded schools and run-down facilities have continued since mid-September.

The French protests began on September 17th, when teachers at a high school in south-eastern Paris protested over staff shortages and students joined them, Australia’s ABC News reported. Demonstrations followed in Spain, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Albania, and smaller protests took place in Greece, Austria, Ireland and Germany, according to the same report. What began over education has since widened to include the cost of living and public-sector cuts.

In this context, the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (FEMYSO) has come under the spotlight following its announcement of support for student protests in France and Belgium, and subsequently in Albania.

Several European reports have drawn links between FEMYSO and the Muslim Brotherhood, describing the student forum as the organisation’s youth wing. Among the most notable is a report by a French National Assembly investigative committee, published in December 2025, which points to close ties between the forum and networks linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and characterises its role as contributing to the spread of the movement’s ideas across Europe.

In a parliamentary question submitted in 2025, Germany’s Baden-Württemberg State Office for the Protection of the Constitution was cited as viewing FEMYSO as an umbrella organisation for youth groups with links to the Muslim Brotherhood.

FEMYSO, however, rejects these allegations. In a previous statement, the organisation affirmed that it has no ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Statements of Support for Protests Across Europe

On October 9th, the forum announced its solidarity with student demonstrations in France and Belgium. On October 18, it declared its support for student and youth protests in Albania, while also referring to ongoing demonstrations in Spain and Greece in the same context.

On October 15th, 2026, the French Muslim Students Association (Étudiants Musulmans de France, EMF), a member organisation of FEMYSO, went beyond expressing solidarity. It called on students, education workers and the broader social movement to join a nationwide mobilisation scheduled for October 17th, reaffirming its support for demonstrations stretching from Paris to Marseille and from Bordeaux to Strasbourg.

In a statement, EMF stressed the need to build a balance of power through protests. The statement came just two days before large-scale demonstrations took place across France, attracting hundreds of thousands of participants in largely peaceful gatherings before separate groups became involved in acts of violence, looting, arson and attacks on police officers and public buildings. These incidents reportedly resulted in more than 1,000 arrests and injuries to dozens of security personnel.

Such initiatives and calls for participation in demonstrations have raised concerns that political Islamist networks may seek to capitalise on public discontent, particularly when protests are accompanied by public disorder or acts of vandalism. This, critics fear, could turn student and social demands into instruments for expanding organisational influence and securing political leverage.

According to official French data, masked and violent individuals were present at the demonstrations. In several cities, shops were looted, while cars and rubbish bins were set on fire. In the city of Limoges, flames engulfed the historic town hall, a building dating back to 1883.

The same data indicated that 1,800 people had been arrested and more than 500 police officers and firefighters had been injured. In response to the violence and rioting, the French government announced the imposition of curfews in several cities.

Concerns Reach the Heart of European Institutions

These developments come at a time when the activities of organisations suspected of having links to the Muslim Brotherhood are facing increasing political scrutiny.

On September 15th, 2026, French MP Constance Le Grip submitted a written question to the government concerning European funding for projects involving FEMYSO, calling for clarification of funding mechanisms and oversight procedures governing grants.

The question followed recent reports and studies that raised concerns over the continued involvement of FEMYSO in projects benefiting from European funding, despite an earlier announcement by the European Commission that the organisation was no longer receiving direct funding.

FEMYSO has consequently become one of the most contentious issues in the wider European debate.

A recent study published by CERIF and AK Polis in September examined the organisation’s participation in the EmpowerAction project, which forms part of the TACKLE initiative funded by the European Union through its DEAR programme.

According to the study, the funding does not necessarily take the form of a direct EU operating grant to FEMYSO. Instead, it may be channelled through partner organisations, projects and sub-granting mechanisms.

This has raised concerns that European funds could reach an organisation through a project led by another partner or through a consortium and its sub-granting arrangements.

Against the backdrop of FEMYSO’s visibility in the protests, some of which were subsequently accompanied by violence and looting, as well as allegations of links to the Muslim Brotherhood, concerns have emerged over the possibility that the organisation could gain a foothold in current social unrest and convert it into political influence by winning the sympathy of European communities and left-wing parties.

FEMYSO: Background, Membership and European Footprint 

The Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (FEMYSO) describes itself as a European umbrella organisation bringing together Muslim youth and student associations.

FEMYSO currently comprises 32 member organisations across 22 European countries. Its roots date back to 1995, when the first meeting of Muslim youth organisations was held in Sweden.

The following year, FEMYSO was formally established at a meeting in Leicester, United Kingdom, which brought together 19 organisations from 11 countries. In 2000, the forum established its headquarters in Brussels.

Ural rock: Moscow's musical shadow gave birth to something entirely new

22 October 2026 at 20:39
Yekaterinburg, formerly Sverdlovsk, functions as Russia's third rock capital, maintaining a level of national influence that rivals Moscow and Leningrad. The emergence of the "Ural rock" phenomenon-represented by legacy acts like Nautilus Pompilius and Agatha Christie to modern groups such as Obe Dve-was not accidental, but the result of specific institutional, educational, and geographic conditions that shaped the lives of musicians in the region. The scene first materialized within the Sverdlovsk Architectural Institute. In 1980, the group Sonans recorded the first Sverdlovsk rock album, Shagrenevaya Kozha, in the institute's creative studio. This academic environment provided the initial material base for artists like Vyacheslav Butusov and Dmitry Umetsky, who formed Nautilus Pompilius. The technical capacity for recording evolved in the basement of a student club at 24 Tolmacheva Street, where the seminal 1986 album Razluka was produced. Between 1986 and 1991, the institutionalization of the scene peaked with the Sverdlovsk Rock Club. For the musicians, the club served as a mechanism for survival and visibility, providing the legal cover necessary to bypass Soviet bureaucratic barriers and secure official permits for public performances. However, this access came with a cost: the club's artistic council acted as a censor. In one instance, the council forced a lyrical change in the song "Skovannye Odnoy Tsepyu," requiring the description of a "brown" sunset to be changed to "pink" to strip the lyrics of their political subtext.

Phuket Jellyfish Surge: Why Rinsing a Sting With Fresh Water Can Make It Worse

22 October 2026 at 19:42
In the final weeks of October, the waters surrounding Phuket and the adjacent coasts of Thailand saw an unusual surge in jellyfish sightings. This was not a casual observation by tourists, but a formal alert issued by the local branch of the Department of Marine and Coastal Resources, warning travelers that the risk of contact with these organisms had increased significantly. The concern for swimmers is not merely the volume of jellyfish, but the specific presence of box jellyfish. Unlike common stinging varieties that cause localized irritation, the toxins from certain box jellyfish species can trigger systemic reactions. Victims may experience headaches, elevated body temperature, swelling, and limb pain; in the most severe instances, such encounters can be fatal. The Danger of Misapplied First Aid When a sting occurs, a common but dangerous misconception is to rinse the affected area with fresh water. According to marine experts, this can be counterproductive. The recommended immediate treatment is the application of a vinegar solution, which is typically stocked at beach lifeguard stations. While some use aloe vera for soothing, professionals emphasize that the effectiveness of any remedy depends entirely on the specific species of jellyfish involved.

Ryanair CEO Predicts 20% Fare Hike as European Seat Supply Shrinks

22 October 2026 at 18:36
Michael O'Leary, the chief executive of Ryanair, has projected that airfares across Europe could rise by 10% to 20% within the next year. If this forecast materializes, it would mark the most significant price increase in the history of regional aviation. This is not a coordinated price-fixing scheme, but rather the direct result of two converging market forces: volatile fuel costs and a shrinking supply of seats. The Cost of Uncertainty For travelers, the sticker price on a ticket often obscures the underlying mechanics driving the cost. The primary driver is the volatility of aviation fuel. Carriers that failed to hedge their fuel exposure early are now forced to buy jet fuel at peak market rates, directly inflating their operating costs. Simultaneously, the competitive landscape is thinning out. Industry experts predict a decline in the total number of available seats by 2027, driven by a series of bankruptcies and consolidations among airlines. With fewer players competing for the same passengers, the pressure to offer rock-bottom fares naturally diminishes. What the Numbers Mean for Your Wallet Major carriers have attempted to stabilize their costs through hedging, but these protections are temporary. Take Ryanair, for example: the company has secured fuel for 80% of its requirements at a locked-in price of $67 per barrel through March 2027. However, this financial shield evaporates quickly. Starting in April 2027, that protected volume drops to just 15% of their needs, and the contractual price jumps to $85 per barrel. Since current market prices are already elevated, even the largest low-cost carriers will struggle to maintain their traditional discount levels once their hedging buffers run dry.

❌