❌

Normal view

Mark Zuckerberg keeps coming out on top

23 October 2026 at 20:08
Mark Zuckerberg
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

picture alliance/Getty; Tyler Le/BI

Meta's AI gamble is suddenly looking like a win for Mark Zuckerberg.

That was far from a given. Even the Meta CEO was doubting himself. His company had poured hundreds of billions of dollars into AI investments with largely unproven results.

"Are you sure this is going to work?" he asked his 29-year-old AI chief, Alexandr Wang, at the end of last year, he recalled on a recent episode of the "Cheeky Pint" podcast.

Those risky AI bets — which one analyst compared to throwing spaghetti at the wall — as well as the massive layoffs and reorganization that came with them, are now starting to pay off. Meta beat its AI rivals to the punch with its new AI assistant, Muse, and it finally released a frontier AI model. Although Muse is bleeding cash amid high compute costs, analysts are excited by its moneymaking potential.

Zuckerberg is riding high, too. Sipping a Guinness alongside Wang during a recent podcast interview, the pair extolled Meta's AI prowess.

"You never know when you launch something how it's going to be received," the CEO said. "There's always the case where you get a home run, which in this case it was, right? And it's just like extremely well received right off the bat."

And Meta seems to believe in Zuckerberg's leadership more than ever. His latest coup: Convincing the company to issue a new class of shares after he threatened to list his Palo Alto compound and leave California as voters weigh a billionaire tax.

The big question is how long the good vibes will last. Meta is still spending gobs of money on AI without a concrete financial payoff. Some remain skeptical.

"The bill is huge," David Wagner, a portfolio manager at Aptus Capital Advisors, told Business Insider.

"He's won the narrative. He hasn't proven the return yet."

Meta's social reckoning era

Zuckerberg is no stranger to public discourse. He's undertaken multiple personas: the nerdy wunderkind in hoodies, the jacked wife guy, the unapologetically masculine Trump ally.

At the beginning of this year, it looked as if he was headed for a new reckoning, and it wasn't just because of the aptly named sequel to "The Social Network."

Zuckerberg was on trial, taking the stand in a landmark lawsuit that alleged Meta's platforms harmed the mental health of young people. (Meta was found negligent and is appealing.) It was one of three major lawsuits this year that put the company on the defensive against claims that its technology posed safety risks to children.

Mark Zuckerberg at LA courthouse
In February, Mark Zuckerberg appeared at a Los Angeles courthouse to defend the company in a landmark social media addiction trial.

Jon Putman/Anadolu via Getty Images

And there were the more typical Zuckerberg cringe moments, too, like his front-row appearance at a Prada fashion show that raised eyebrows across the internet.

On the inside, employee morale was waning. Though the billionaire CEO had called 2026 "the year of AI," Meta had little momentum, and unpopular decisions — including a program to track employee keystrokes — amplified the discontent.

Also, Meta had one of its largest rounds of layoffs, ever. Meta began trimming staff in March, followed by a huge round in May, when it laid off about 10% of its workforce.

Separately, Meta reshuffled another 7,000 workers as part of an AI-focused reorganization of its tech and product teams. Many engineers were relegated to individual contributor status. Meta later asked some of the employees it had demoted to return to their managerial roles.

The AI push didn't seem to be paying off: In the second quarter of this year, 98% of revenue came from its traditional advertising business — not AI.

Morale was "maybe not the worst it's ever been in 20 years here, but it's probably up there," Meta's chief technology officer, Andrew "Boz" Bosworth, said during an internal call in June.

The groundwork for Meta's comeback

Amid the chaos, Zuckerberg laid the groundwork for a comeback. Wang and Meta's elite AI researchers moved their desks to sit near Zuckerberg.

Starting last year, Zuckerberg and Wang also went on a talent-hiring spree, dangling pay packages worth hundreds of millions of dollars to poach top researchers.

Zuckerberg empowered key lieutenants, including former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, to go ham on any vision they had, including on his pet project, an AI assistant. It all fit into Zuckerberg's longtime playbook of embracing small teams and overseeing reorgs until something works — move fast and break things, as he has infamously put it.

It worked.

Muse, the long-awaited Meta AI agent, became a breakout hit. A week after it launched, it shot to the top of the app store, and has since achieved more than 10 million downloads in North America. The team was stunned to have beaten OpenAI to market, a person familiar with the matter said. OpenAI's rival product, Dots, launched three weeks later.

Jolly, Meta's mascot for its Muse agent, waves.
Jolly is the mascot for Meta's Muse AI agent, which launched successfully last month.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Meta also threw unprecedented compute and talent at building a series of frontier AI models, called Muse Wonder, that could keep up with those from giants like OpenAI and Anthropic.

On Meta's third-quarter earnings call, Zuckerberg was optimistic that Meta's AI and hardware investments could soon become cash cows, as people shop through Muse and buy more virtual-reality glasses powered by the company's growing AI chops.

Meta, meanwhile, views Zuckerberg as more critical than ever to its long-term fortunes.

Key board members abruptly excused themselves from a dinner with Zuckerberg in September after he told them he was going to sell his Palo Alto estate in response to California's proposed billionaire tax, Meta disclosed in a filing on Wednesday.

Four days later, a special committee returned with a deal that would give Zuckerberg $20 billion in "immediate liquidity" to cover the tax — if it passes — without reducing his controlling stake in Meta. Meta also made plans to ensure that billions in fresh AI fundraising wouldn't dilute Zuckerberg's control.

"Meta's track record of significant value creation for its shareholders is in large part due to his strong leadership, unique and creative vision, and exceptional management abilities," the company said in a press release.

The personal win comes as some of his other problems have blown over. Meta settled a major lawsuit brought by attorneys general across states, Washington, DC, and US territories. As part of the settlement, the company committed to make changes to its apps, such as daily time limits and pausing notifications overnight. The agreement was part of an August settlement, a move that allowed Meta to call out its competitors such as YouTube and TikTok.

"All platforms should empower parents and support teens by putting the same measures in place, because we know that when teens are restricted on one app, they simply move to another," the company said in a blog post at the time.

Big questions still loom. The day after Meta reported strong earnings and Muse adoption, its stock fell 7% as investors absorbed the scale of the company's hundreds of billions of dollars in future spending commitments.

And the legal troubles keep on coming. This week, a New Mexico jury also ordered Meta to pay a staggering $25 billion over the Cambridge Analytica scandal, a case that Meta plans to appeal.

Whether Zuckerberg's strategy is sustainable or not, the vibe shift has been notable — and may have proven naysayers wrong, at least until the next period of chaos erupts.

"Meta is cool again," Jesse Cohen, an analyst at Investing.com, said in a note. "That's the Muse effect."

Read the original article on Business Insider

TSE nega derrubada de canais políticos e cobra isonomia de plataformas

23 October 2026 at 18:35

O TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) afirmou nesta sexta-feira (23) que não há nenhuma decisão para retirar do ar canais do WhatsApp. Em nota, a Corte classificou como “absolutamente indevidas” as suposições de que grupos serão derrubados com base em despachos de pedidos de informações a plataformas digitais.

Presidente da Corte Eleitoral, o ministro Kassio Nunes Marques determinou, na quinta-feira (22), prazo de 24 horas para a Meta apresentar um relatório técnico detalhado sobre o funcionamento do canal “Exército do Lula“.

“O TSE não determinou a retirada de nenhum canal de WhatsApp do ar. Os prazos dos processos de propaganda são sempre curtos. Ilações a partir desses despachos que pedem informação em tempo curto são absolutamente indevidas”, diz o comunicado.

Leia Mais:

De acordo com o TSE, em reunião com representantes de plataformas digitais nesta manhã, Nunes Marques pediu o “reforço de pessoal e atuação isonômica por parte das plataformas a fim de garantir o cumprimento do plano de conformidade assinado por todas as empresas”.

Participaram do encontro representantes da Meta, X, Google, TikTok e Kwai. Segundo a Corte, foram discutidas “providências para o atendimento da legislação eleitoral”.

Receio da campanha de Lula

Na manhã desta sexta, o deputado federal André Janones (Rede-MG), articulador do canal “Exército de Lula”, divulgou que o grupo seria derrubado pelo TSE na noite de hoje.

Segundo apurou a CNN, integrantes da campanha do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) ouviram de interlocutores do tribunal que de fato havia essa possibilidade. O receio de uma suspensão, segundo a campanha, está relacionado a medidas recentes adotadas pela Corte.

De acordo com integrantes da equipe do presidente, técnicos do TSE já haviam analisado o canal e concluído que não havia desinformação ou irregularidades. Apesar disso, Nunes Marques determinou na quinta-feira (22) que a Meta faça uma análise detalhada do grupo, o que, na avaliação desses integrantes, trouxe novamente o caso ao centro das discussões de forma desnecessária.

Os petistas também citam uma minuta de resolução elaborada pelo ministro André Mendonça que propunha proibir canais de WhatsApp nas 48 horas anteriores às eleições.

Na avaliação de Mendonça, esses grupos têm potencial para interferir no alcance da propaganda eleitoral, assim como conteúdos impulsionados, que já são proibidos nos dois dias anteriores ao pleito.

As movimentações do tribunal se dão em meio a mais um capítulo da disputa em torno do “Exército do Lula”. Em 11 de outubro, Nunes Marques mandou suspender o canal, mas a ordem foi derrubada no mesmo dia pelo corregedor-geral eleitoral, Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, relator de outra frente do caso, que determinou o restabelecimento da página.

Uma análise técnica do TSE não identificou conteúdo falso entre as publicações examinadas.

Dois dias depois, Nunes Marques condicionou o funcionamento do canal ao registro na Justiça Eleitoral. A campanha de Lula informou o endereço ao tribunal, mas afirmou que o fez apenas para cumprir a determinação, sem assumir a administração nem a responsabilidade pelo espaço. Na mesma noite, o canal saiu do ar e só voltou no dia seguinte, após nova decisão do ministro.

Nesta sexta-feira, o canal já somava mais de 9,4 milhões de participantes.

The states with the fewest and most data centers, ranked

23 October 2026 at 17:56
Aerial view of a large industrial facility with rooftop equipment, exterior construction, roads, parking lots, and surrounding greenery.
An Amazon Web Services data center under construction in Sterling, Virginia. Virginia has the highest number of data centers of any state.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

  • The AI boom is accelerating data center development across the US.
  • Even states with few data centers are attracting major hyperscale projects.
  • Here's how all 50 US states rank by their number of operational data centers.

The data center business is booming in the US, and some states are feeling it more than others.

Data centers, which house the computing machines that power digital services, have been around for decades. However, the amount of computing power required to fuel the AI boom has accelerated their development and brought the industry into the mainstream.

This ranking was compiled by analyzing data from Data Center Map, an industry source that maps data center locations around the world. It shows a snapshot of its US database as of October 2026. Business Insider limited this ranking to fully operational data centers.

Data Center Map compiles its data from multiple sources and mainly tracks cloud and colocation service providers. Each data center it tracks has to have an initial capacity of at least 10 cabinets. While some states have hyperscale AI data centers, others have relatively small operations.

Firstly, data center operators and service providers add their own listings to market themselves. Data Center Map also monitors external databases and manually identifies any missing operators. It also handles requests from users who identify missing or outdated listings.

There is no federal requirement for data centers to register in a central database, so the figures should not be interpreted as a complete census of every data center in the country. Data Center Map also says it has a "more limited coverage on enterprise and government data centers."

Last year, Business Insider created its own US data centers map, which included estimated power usage, as part of an investigation into the industry.

Here are the states with the most operational data centers, ranked from least to most.

50. Vermont
Aerial view of a small town with a white church steeple, forested hills, and mountains under a cloudy sky.
Stowe, Vermont.

Jim Espey/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 3

Vermont's three operational data centers are located in Stowe, South Burlington, and Williston. The state has a limited electrical grid, according to the Vermont Natural Resources Council.

49. Alaska
Aerial view of downtown Anchorage with residential neighborhoods, high-rise buildings, green parkland, and Cook Inlet waterfront.
Anchorage, Alaska.

Jacob Boomsma/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 4

Half of Alaska's operational data centers are located in Anchorage. The University of Alaska Fairbanks said that the high cost of electricity and network connections are some of the challenges for data center buildout in the state.

48. South Dakota
Waterfalls cascade over rocky ledges beside a stone-and-wood structure under a partly cloudy sky.
Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Lindsay Guido/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 5

Most of South Dakota's data centers are in Sioux Falls. Lawmakers in South Dakota rejected proposals for industry tax incentives in 2026 while enacting new restrictions on electricity and water use, according to the South Dakota Searchlight.

46. Maine (tie)
Green steel truss bridge spans a calm river beside rocky banks, vegetation, and red brick industrial buildings.
Brunswick, Maine.

Photo Italia LLC/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 6

Maine has data centers in Portland, Brunswick, and Bangor.

Maine's Gov. Janet Mills signed an order in April to establish a data center advisory council to advise on large-scale data center development.

46. Delaware (tie)
Wilmington, Delaware.
Wilmington, Delaware.

Bo Shen/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 6

Half of the data centers in Delaware are located in Wilmington.

Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer signed legislation in August requiring data centers to generate their own energy and cover infrastructure costs, WHYY reported.

44. West Virginia (tie)
Steel arch bridge spans a river beside a downtown skyline at dusk with reflections on the water.
Charleston, West Virginia.

Sean Pavone/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 7

West Virginia's data centers are located in South Charleston, Bridgeport, Charleston, Star City, Petersburg, Nitro, and Berkeley Springs.

Having previously lacked the regulatory framework to approve or deny large-scale projects, Gov. Patrick Morrisey announced a data center development plan in August.

44. Rhode Island (tie)
Aerial view of downtown Providence skyline beside the Providence River under a partly cloudy blue sky.
Providence, Rhode Island.

Wirestock/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 7

All of Rhode Island's data centers are located in Providence.

The Providence Journal reported in April that one of the reasons Rhode Island has not been as attractive to data center developers is high energy costs.

42. Montana (tie)
Elevated view of a city skyline with tree-filled neighborhoods and low hills under a cloudy sky.
Billings, Montana.

George Dodd/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 8

The majority of Montana's data centers are located in Billings.

Big Sky Digital Infrastructure is developing a 5,100-acre campus 30 miles north of Billings.

42. Hawaii (tie)
Honolulu waterfront skyline at dusk with Aloha Tower lit beside harbor water and office buildings.
Honolulu, Hawaii.

otman lazrak/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 8

Over half of Hawaii's data centers are in Honolulu.

The Honolulu Civil Beat reported that there are currently no hyperscale data centers in Hawaii.

41. Arkansas
Urban park with a winding boardwalk over water, green trees, and a modern skyline beneath cloudy sunlight.
Little Rock, Arkansas.

Brandon Olafsson/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 9

The city with the most data centers in Arkansas is Little Rock.

Google announced its first data center in the state, to be located in West Memphis, in 2025, while Avaio is developing a large-scale one near Little Rock.

39. New Hampshire (tie)
Aerial view of a riverfront city with brick mill buildings, downtown towers, highways, and autumn trees.
Manchester, New Hampshire.

ChrisBoswell/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 10

Manchester has three data centers, while the rest are spread across seven different cities.

A proposed data center in Nottingham was withdrawn earlier this year following local opposition, the New Hampshire Bulletin reported.

39. Idaho (tie)
Downtown Boise skyline and the Idaho State Capitol are lit by sunset beneath dramatic storm clouds.
Boise, Idaho.

knowlesgallery/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 10

Four of Idaho's 10 data centers are located in Boise, followed by three in Coeur d'Alene.

Meta plans to operate a $1.2 billion data center in Kuna, which it broke ground on in 2022.

38. Louisiana
Workers in safety vests walk through a muddy construction site with cranes, barriers, and steel framing in the background.
Construction underway at River Bend, Hut 8's AI data center campus in Saint Francisville, Louisiana.

Kathleen Flynn/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 12

The majority of Louisiana's data centers are located in New Orleans and Baton Rouge.

Meta is building its largest-ever data center in Richland Parish, which will house the multi-gigawatt AI cluster Hyperion.

37. North Dakota
Parked cars line a downtown street with historic storefronts, a skyway, and a modern high-rise under blue sky.
Fargo, North Dakota.

gnagel/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 13

Four of North Dakota's data centers are located in Fargo, followed by three in Ellendale.

There are some large-scale data center projects in the state, such as Applied Digital's 280-megawatt campus near Harwood.

36. Kansas
Terraced concrete spillway and pedestrian bridge overlook a pond in a landscaped park under a clear blue sky.
Lenexa, Kansas.

Wirestock/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 15

Nearly half of Kansas' operational data centers are located in Lenexa, which has seven of the state's 15 facilities.

Kansas is experiencing a surge in plans for large-scale data center development, including one by Dubai-based developer Damac Properties in Edgerton, Kansas, The Wall Street Journal reported.

35. Mississippi
Industrial facility grounds with utility poles, work trucks, and a Southaven water tower behind a large white building.
Work continues on a data center being built by SpaceXAI in Southaven, Mississippi.

Brandon Dill / AFP via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 16

Six of Mississippi's operational data centers are located in Canton.

Amazon announced in April this year that it increased its total planned investment in its Mississippi data centers, including in Canton, to $25 billion.

33. New Mexico (tie)
Desert roadside gate and fence stand before a dry hillside and rugged mountains under a clear blue sky.
Los Lunas, New Mexico.

Lily Kimei/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 20

Over half of New Mexico's data centers are located in Los Lunas.

Meta opened a data center in Los Lunas in 2019, which it has since expanded.

33. Connecticut (tie)
Elevated view of an urban plaza with leafless trees, surrounding buildings, and an American flag under a cloudy sky.
Stamford, Connecticut.

stockphoto52/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 20

Connecticut's 20 operational data centers are spread across multiple cities, with the highest concentration in Stamford.

The Connecticut Mirror reported that lawmakers said the state's high electricity costs make it unattractive to data center developers.

32. Wyoming
Black cattle graze among sagebrush on a grassy hillside beneath a cloudy sky.
Cows graze in the area where the Prometheus Hyperscale Data Center will be built east of Evanston, Wyoming.

Natalie Behring/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 22

All but two of Wyoming's data centers are located in Cheyenne, with the other two in Casper and Afton.

In 2012, Microsoft built its first data center in Cheyenne and has expanded its footprint there multiple times since.

31. Alabama
Dusk Over The Downtown Urban City Center of Huntsville Alabama
Dusk Over The Downtown Urban City Center of Huntsville Alabama

ChrisBoswell/Getty Images/iStockphoto

Number of operational data centers: 23

Huntsville has the most operational data centers in Alabama.

Meta broke ground on its Huntsville campus in 2018.

30. South Carolina
Crowd gathers before a bunting-decorated stage labeled “MONCKS CORNER,S.C.” under a cloudy sky.
Moncks Corner, South Carolina.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 26

Moncks Corner has the most operational data centers in South Carolina, accounting for 11 of the state's 26 facilities.

Google has three facilities in South Carolina, where it first made its footprint in 2007.

29. Maryland
Aerial view of downtown Baltimore skyline with urban buildings, roads, greenery, and water under a partly cloudy sky.
Baltimore, Maryland.

Majestic_Aerials/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 27

Baltimore has the most operational data centers in Maryland, followed by Frederick.

Amazon is developing a new data center campus in Frederick, Maryland.

28. Kentucky
Aerial view of downtown Louisville skyscrapers and hotels, including the Galt House Hotel, under a clear blue sky.
Louisville, Kentucky.

Nicholas Klein/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 32

Louisville has the most operational data centers in Kentucky, with 13 of the state's 32 facilities.

Mason County, Kentucky, recently signed a development agreement for a Meta hyperscale data center, as reported by LEX 18.

27. Utah
Fenced industrial buildings sit beyond a dirt road and scrubland under a cloudy mountain skyline.
Meta data center campus complex in Eagle Mountain.

Charles-McClintock Wilson/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 35

Salt Lake City has the most operational data centers in Utah, followed by Bluffdale, Eagle Mountain, and West Jordan.

Meta operates a campus in Eagle Mountain, and the National Security Agency operates one located near Bluffdale.

25. Oklahoma (tie)
Aerial view of a large construction site with earthmoving equipment, parked cars, trailers, and cleared land.
Construction of a 500-acre data center in Owasso, Oklahoma.

Jim West/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 36

Most of Oklahoma's data centers are located in Tulsa, followed by Oklahoma City and Pryor.

Google operates a facility in Pryor and is developing additional locations in the state.

25. Nebraska (tie)
Google logo appears on a white industrial building beside utility structures, poles, grass and a cloudy sky.
Google data center in Papillion, Nebraska.

Misty Prochaska for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 36

Omaha has the most operational data centers in Nebraska, with 11, followed by Papillion and Springfield, each with 8.

Google has campuses in Lincoln, Omaha, and Papillion.

24. Wisconsin
Aerial view of a large industrial campus under construction with retention ponds, roads, and a sunset horizon.
Microsoft's data center project in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, on November 13, 2025.

Joe Timmerman/Wisconsin Watch via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 41

Wisconsin's 41 data centers are spread across several cities, with Milwaukee and Madison hosting the most.

Microsoft finished building an AI data center in Mount Pleasant in June.

23. Massachusetts
Aerial view of a neighborhood with houses, tree-lined streets, and a large black industrial building.
The Markley Group data center in Lowell.

Danielle Parhizkaran/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 46

Marlborough has the most operational data centers in Massachusetts, with six, followed by Boston with five, and Cambridge and Waltham with four each.

CBS News reported that the biggest, the Markley data center, is in Lowell.

21. Missouri (tie)
Downtown Kansas City skyline rises beyond green parkland and roads in warm evening light.
Kansas City, Missouri.

Garrett Smith/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 47

Missouri's 47 operational data centers are spread across eight cities, with Kansas City accounting for most of them.

Axios reported in September that most of Missouri's planned data center expansion is concentrated in the Kansas City metropolitan area, citing research by Cleanview.

21. Minnesota (tie)
Spoonbridge and Cherry sculpture spans a pond in a green park with the Basilica of Saint Mary in the background.
Minneapolis, Minnesota.

GummyBone/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 47

Minnesota's 47 data centers are spread across 21 cities, with Minneapolis accounting for 15, followed by Eden Prairie, St. Paul, Shakopee, and Minnetonka.

Google announced earlier this year that it plans to build a data center in Pine Island.

20. Nevada
Aerial view of a large construction site with a partially built structure in a dry hilly desert landscape.
The Tahoe Reno Industrial Center. Several companies are building facilities in an area about 15 miles east of downtown Reno in this development project named the Tahoe Reno Industrial Center including data storage facilities from Switch. Apple is also building a data storage facility nearby in the Reno Technology Park (Photo by David Butow/Corbis via Getty Images)

David Butow/Corbis via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 51

More than half of Nevada's data centers are located in Las Vegas.

Switch has plans to expand its Citadel Campus at the Tahoe Reno Industrial Center, which the company says will have gigawatts of power capacity upon completion.

19. Indiana
NEW CARLISLE, INDIANA - OCTOBER 2: In this handout provided by Amazon, a technician works at an Amazon Web Services AI data center in New Carlisle, Indiana on October 2, 2025.
A technician works at an Amazon Web Services AI data center in New Carlisle, Indiana.

Noah Berger/Getty Images via Amazon Web Services

Number of operational data centers: 51

Indiana's 51 operational data centers are spread across 11 cities, with Indianapolis leading and New Carlisle following.

18. Tennessee
Industrial construction site behind a chain-link fence with heavy equipment, trucks, tall towers, and drifting smoke.
Construction at an xAI data center in Memphis on April 25, 2025.

Brandon Dill for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 53

Nashville has the largest concentration of Tennessee's 53 operational data centers.

Elon Musk's xAI describes its Colossus facility in Memphis as the world's largest AI supercomputer.

16. Michigan (tie)
Aerial view of a large industrial construction site with cranes, white-roofed buildings, and surrounding farmland.
Construction of a data center developed by Related Digital for Oracle and OpenAI in Saline, Michigan.

: Jim West/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 58

Michigan's 58 data centers are spread across 27 cities, with Southfield accounting for the most.

Part of the Stargate Project, Related Digital kicked off construction of a $16 billion data center called "The Barn" in Saline Township in June.

16. Colorado (tie)
Heavy earthmoving machines work on a dirt mound behind a chain-link fence at a construction site.
QTS constructs a data center in Aurora in 2025.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 58

There are 14 data centers in operation in Denver, followed by 11 in Englewood, 7 in Centennial, and 7 in Colorado Springs.

QTS is expanding its 65-acre data center campus in Aurora, Colorado, Colorado Public Radio reported in July.

15. Iowa
Blue and gray edged facility building at 9100 behind a black security fence under clear sky.
The "Edged Des Moines" data center nears completion in Altoona, Iowa.

Leon Neal/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 69

Altoona and West Des Moines are among Iowa's leading data center locations, alongside Council Bluffs and Des Moines.

Google has had a campus in Council Bluffs since 2007, recently invested in its expansion, and has also kicked off a new one in Cedar Rapids.

14. North Carolina
Modern gray building with vertical concrete panels, flags, parked cars, landscaped rocks, trees, and lawn under cloudy sky.
Meta's data center in Forest City, taken in 2010 when it was formerly a Facebook data center.

Rainier Ehrhardt/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 76

Charlotte has 24 data centers, the most in North Carolina, followed by Raleigh, Maiden, and Lenoir.

Apple operates a data center in Maiden, according to The Charlotte Observer. Google and Meta also operate data centers in the state.

12. Pennsylvania (tie)
Two large cooling towers release steam behind an industrial facility construction site under a partly cloudy sky.
An Amazon Web Services construction project in Berwick.

Paul Weaver/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 78

Pittsburgh and Philadelphia have the largest concentrations of operational data centers in Pennsylvania.

In 2025, Amazon announced plans to invest at least $20 billion in the state to expand its data center operations.

12. New Jersey (tie)
Large windowless concrete building sits behind a black fence along a quiet street under a clear blue sky.
The Equinix NY5 data center in Secaucus, New Jersey.

Kena Betancur/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 78

Secaucus and Piscataway are two of New Jersey's main data center hubs, alongside Jersey City.

Equinix operates a 129,436-square-foot data center in Secaucus, known as NY5.

11. Florida
Aerial view of a modern glass and concrete facility with orange accents beside a multi-lane highway.
The HostDime data center in Eatonville, Florida, is north of Orlando.

Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 113

Florida's 113 operational data centers are spread across 27 locations, with Miami accounting for the most at 33, followed by Tampa with 20, Jacksonville with 13, and Orlando with nine.

Data center provider HostDime has been based in the state since 2003 and is building a 100,000-square-foot facility in Eatonville.

10. Arizona
A data center under construction under a blue sky.
A QTS data center under construction in Phoenix in 2024.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 114

Phoenix contains 34 of Arizona's data centers, followed by Goodyear with 24, and Chandler with 17.

ABC 15 reported that companies such as Meta, Apple, and Microsoft all have campuses in Arizona.

9. Georgia
Aerial view of a large industrial complex under construction surrounded by parking lots, roads, forest, and power infrastructure.
A QTS data center complex in Fayetteville, Georgia, in 2024.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 123

Atlanta has the largest concentration of operational data centers in Georgia, with 43 facilities, followed by Lithia Springs with 25 and Social Circle with 10.

Google built its first data center in Georgia in 2007, and QTS is has one in Fayetteville.

8. Washington
Large industrial warehouse complex with flat roofs surrounded by trees and roads under a cloudy sky.
The Sabey Data Centers' Seattle Data Center campus in Tukwila, Washington.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 132

Quincy has the largest concentration of operational data centers in Washington, with 33 facilities, followed by Seattle with 31, Tukwila with 16, and East Wenatchee with 11.

Washington's Department of Ecology says Quincy and Wenatchee are popular spots because they have cheaper, reliable energy.

7. Oregon
Modern white industrial building with large dark windows, concrete walkway, rocks, and sparse landscaping under a clear blue sky.
The Facebook Inc. Prineville Data Center stands in Prineville, Oregon, U.S., on Monday, April 28, 2014. The Facebook Prineville Data Center features leading energy-efficient technology, including features such as rainwater reclamation, a solar energy installation for providing electricity to the office areas and reuse of heat created by the servers to heat office space. Photographer: Meg Roussos/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 141

Hillsboro has the most operational data centers in Oregon, followed by Boardman, and then Umatilla and Prineville.

Oregon is home to Meta and Google's first-ever data centers: Meta built its in Prineville, and Google's The Dalles.

6. Illinois
Modern glass office building stands behind a wide road with parked cars and trees under a clear sky.
A CyrusOne data center in Aurora, Illinois.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 143

Chicago has the largest concentration of operational data centers in Illinois, with 49 facilities, followed by Elk Grove Village, which has 24. Lombard, Aurora, and DeKalb each have seven.

Companies such as Digital Realty Trust, Microsoft, Meta, and CyrusOne operate in Illinois.

5. New York
Gray industrial facility behind black security fencing, with autumn vegetation and trees under an overcast sky.
The JPMorgan Chase data center in Orangeburg, New York.

Kena Betancur/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 149

New York City is home to a large share of the state's operational data centers, with additional concentrations in Buffalo and Albany.

In July, New York was the first state to enact an executive order that imposed a statewide yearlong moratorium on hyperscale AI data centers.

4. Ohio
Aerial view of a large industrial construction site with rooftop equipment, rows of white units, cars, and surrounding fields.
The 5C Data Centers CMH01 on October 18, 2026 in Springfield, Ohio.

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 189

Columbus has the largest concentration of operational data centers in Ohio, with Johnstown, Hilliard, and Cleveland also home to significant numbers of facilities.

Intel announced plans in 2022 for a major semiconductor manufacturing facility in New Albany, a suburb in central Ohio known as the "Silicon Heartland," which is already home to data centers operated by Amazon, Google, and Meta, as Business Insider previously reported.

3. California
Aerial view of city blocks with modern buildings, streets, cars, and a waterfront pier beside the bay.
The Digital Realty SFO12 Data Center, center in the Rincon Hill neighborhood of San Francisco.

Stephen Lam/San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 285

Santa Clara has the largest concentration of operational data centers in California, with 75 facilities, followed by Los Angeles with 51 and San Jose with 26.

Major operators in Santa Clara include Digital Realty, Equinix, CoreSite, and Vantage Data Centers.

2. Texas
Aerial view of a large industrial building under construction amid red dirt earthworks, cranes, equipment, and surrounding forest.
The Stargate Oracle AI data center under construction on August 26, 2026 in Abilene, Texas.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 358

Of Texas's 358 operational data centers, 58 are located in Dallas, 42 in Houston, and 39 in San Antonio.

Earlier this year, Business Insider, citing research from Jones Lang LaSalle, reported that Texas is on track to become the largest data center market in the world by 2030.

Texas is home to some of the world's largest planned data center projects, such as Fermi America's Project Matador.

1. Virginia
Aerial view of large industrial data center buildings beside a river and surrounding suburban neighborhoods.
An Amazon Web Services data center in Aldie, Virginia.

Bloomberg/Getty Images

Number of operational data centers: 452

Northern Virginia is not only the largest data center market in the US but also in the world. Major operators in the state include Equinix, Digital Realty, Microsoft, Vantage Data Centers, and Amazon.

Ashburn has the largest concentration of operational data centers in Virginia, with 102 facilities, followed by Sterling with 84 and Manassas with 60.

Read the original article on Business Insider

45 seconds of voting in the Lviv Oblast Council sparked a new dispute with Poland: Warsaw says Kyiv promised the UPA year decision will not take effect

23 October 2026 at 15:05

45 seconds voting lviv oblast council sparked new dispute poland warsaw says kyiv promised upa year decision take effect · post roman shukhevych commander-in-chief ukrainian insurgent army (upa) 1943 1950

On 20 October, the Lviv Oblast Council voted to declare 2027 the year of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), its commander Roman Shukhevych, and Oleh Olzhych, a poet and member of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). The vote on the UPA and Shukhevych took 45 seconds, Ukrainska Pravda reported, citing the council's online broadcast. It reopened a dispute Kyiv and Warsaw had only just settled. In May, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy gave a special operations unit the honorary name "Heroes of the UPA," and Polish President Karol Nawrocki later stripped him of the Order of the White Eagle in response.

Poland is the main hub for Western aid to Ukraine, and that role rests on Polish trust, which every new fight over the two nations' shared past erodes. Since 2022, Poland has also paid for nearly 30,000 Starlink terminals for Ukraine, Rzeczpospolita reported. The sorest point is the UPA. Poland recognizes the UPA's 1943 Volhynia massacres of Poles as genocide, a classification Ukraine disputes, pointing to the broader Polish-Ukrainian conflict of World War II, in which both sides killed civilians.

A batch vote, then a "catastrophe"

The resolution honoring the UPA commander and his fighters passed with 52 of the 55 deputies who voted, none against. The one on Olzhych passed 49 of 54. A source in the council told Ukrainska Pravda that, after a lunch break and an air raid alert, deputies voted through 30 to 40 minor items one after another without discussion, and the UPA year passed among them.

A source in the Office of the President called the situation a "catastrophe."

"Ukraine looks irrational. We only just settled the previous crisis, and now this. Everyone knew it was not allowed, the head of the oblast knew about it personally. But the chase for cheap one-day hype won out. The consequences are already here, and they will only grow," the source told Ukrainska Pravda.

The same source said the decision put the next Polish military aid package at risk. Polish Defense Ministry spokesperson Janusz Sejmej said this was "not true," and Deputy Defense Minister Cezary Tomczyk said Poland would keep helping Ukraine.

Ukraine's Foreign Ministry called the decision counterproductive, noted that oblast deputies are not subordinate to central authorities, and urged Poland to refrain from sharp steps that could hinder the normalization of relations. "Only Russia stands to gain from tension in our relations with Poland," Iryna Vereshchuk, deputy head of the Office of the President, wrote.

Kyrylo Budanov, head of Ukraine's Office of the President, gestures while speaking during an interview, wearing a black fleece marked with his name and the HUR insignia.
Explore further

“Heroes of UPA” unit will keep its name, Budanov’s office says despite Polish pressure

Warsaw holds Kyiv to its word, but Lviv won't budge

Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz called the decision unacceptable. Deputy Foreign Minister Marcin Bosacki told Polsat News on 21 October that it was hard to imagine a worse decision for Polish-Ukrainian relations. He said Zelenskyy's aides had assured Warsaw it would not take effect, and that the resolution had disappeared from the council's website after Poland intervened, which he called promising. Warsaw would hold the Ukrainian authorities to their word, he added.

The council itself does not plan to revoke or revise the decision, its representatives told Liga on 21 October.

On 23 October, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said he had received a signal from Zelenskyy that he "will in no way support this decision" if further steps depend on him. "Ukraine will simply have very serious problems with integration if it does not also respect our sensitivity," Tusk said.

Poland bans proposal's initiator, who took part in search in Łasków, from Schengen Area

Poland has barred Sviatoslav Sheremeta, the Lviv Oblast Council deputy who initiated the decision, from entering the Schengen Area for five years, until 20 October 2031. Polish Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński announced the ban on 21 October at the request of Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski. Sikorski described Sheremeta as a reenactor of the Galizien Waffen-SS division.

Sviatoslav Sheremeta (center), initiator of the proposal to declare a Year of the UPA in Lviv Oblast, with his team during a search for the remains of Ukrainians killed in 1944 in the village of Łasków, Lublin Voivodeship, Poland, October 2026
Sviatoslav Sheremeta (center), initiator of the proposal to declare a Year of the UPA in Lviv Oblast, with his team during a search for the remains of Ukrainians killed in 1944 in the village of Łasków, Lublin Voivodeship, Poland, October 2026. Photo: Ukrainian Institute of National Memory

Before the ban was announced, Sheremeta told Zaxid.Net that he had never taken part in military-historical reenactment, and noted that Sikorski's post had at first named a "P. Sheremeta." He found Polish officials' reaction strange, since Lviv and other oblast councils had declared years of the UPA and Shukhevych before. "This is nothing new," he said. He added that the decision was not aimed at anyone, least of all Poles or Poland, and that a ban would hurt the two countries' cooperation on commemoration.

Ukrainians have the right to choose their own heroes and honor them, Sheremeta believes. He suggested that recent statements by Polish officials may be linked to the discovery of Ukrainian civilians killed by Polish armed groups in Łasków in 1944.

Human remains, likely belonging to a Ukrainian killed in 1944 in the village of Łasków, Lublin Voivodeship, Poland, October 2026
Human remains, likely belonging to a Ukrainian killed in 1944 in the village of Łasków, Lublin Voivodeship, Poland, October 2026. Photo: Ukrainian Institute of National Memory

Sheremeta also directs Dolia, a memorial search center. In October, Dolia carried out a search in Łasków, a village in Poland's Lublin Voivodeship, and found the remains of more than 40 Ukrainians, including women and children. The Ukrainian Institute of National Memory, which commissioned the search, says they were killed by units of the Polish Home Army and the Peasants' Battalions in an attack on 10 March 1944 in which more than 300 people died. Exhumation is planned for spring 2027.

The dispute over shared memory has shaped relations between Kyiv and Warsaw for a decade. After local authorities in Hruszowice removed a UPA monument in 2017, Ukraine's Institute of National Memory halted exhumations of Poles in Ukraine. Despite a 2019 pledge by the institute to stop blocking them, the first exhumation took place only in April 2025, in Puzhnyky, after Tusk announced a breakthrough.

TSE dá 24h para Meta e X explicarem distribuição de material político 

Logo Agência Brasil

O corregedor-geral da Justiça Eleitoral, ministro Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva, deu prazo de 24 horas para que a empresa Meta – responsável pelas plataformas Facebook, Instagram e WhatsApp – e a rede social X revelem detalhes sobre a remoção de publicações e a forma como distribuem conteúdos de cunho político a seus usuários. 

Cueva é relator de um processo aberto pela campanha do presidente e candidato à reeleição Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, que alega haver um favorecimento nas plataformas de conteúdos ligados ao candidato Flávio Bolsonaro, adversário no segundo turno da corrida presidencial. 

Notícias relacionadas:

Para ilustrar o tratamento desigual, a campanha de Lula citou a remoção de um vídeo do projeto Revelando apresentado pelo artista MC Cabelinho, que contém críticas a Flávio e foi retirado da rede social Instagram na quinta-feira (22), pouco depois de ser lançado, sob alegação de uso excessivo de Inteligência Artificial. 

Para o corregedor eleitoral, diante da proximidade da votação no domingo (25), o episódio “justifica a adoção de providências destinadas a esclarecer os fundamentos da remoção e a assegurar sua pronta reavaliação".

O ministro, contudo, ressalvou que os elementos apresentados até o momento não permitem concluir que o vídeo recebeu “tratamento diferenciado em razão de sua orientação político- eleitoral". Ele determinou à Meta que submeta o material à revisão humana. 

Outra alegação da campanha lulista é que anúncios pagos pelas campanhas oficiais estariam tendo alcance distinto nas redes sociais, com menor distribuição de conteúdos ligados a Lula. A campanha lulista aponta ainda um alcance desproporcional entre conteúdos, com favorecimento a conteúdos do campo adversário. 

A defesa de Lula reclama também de tratamento desigual pela ferramenta de IA Grok, que funciona embutida no X, que apresentaria comportamento distinto quando confrontada com questionamentos semelhantes a respeito das duas candidaturas. 

Em informações apresentadas ao presidente do TSE, ministro Munes Marques, nesta semana, a Meta negou tratamento diferenciado entre as campanhas e afirmou respeitar todas as regras da Justiça Eleitoral. 

Nesta sexta (23), Nunes Marques deve realizar uma última reunião com representantes das principais redes sociais - como Instagram, Facebook, TikTok e Kwai - antes do segundo turno. 

 

I’m a comedian whose joke was stolen by an AI creator. I blame Meta and feel powerless.

23 October 2026 at 13:00
George Brett Olson said his joke was stolen by an AI account, left.
George Brett Olson (right) said his joke was taken by an AI account (left).

George Brett Olson via Instagram

  • George Brett Olson is one of a set of comedians who've called out AI accounts for ripping off their work.
  • Olson said he was upset with Meta for allowing the situation to persist on its platforms.
  • Instagram's top exec said the platform is invested in promoting original content and would look into the issue.

This as-told-to essay is based on an interview with George Brett Olson, one of several comedians who have lately called out AI accounts for ripping off their jokes. It's been edited for length and clarity. Instagram head Adam Mosseri said he would look into what could be done about the issue and that the platform was invested in driving traffic to original content.

I started doing stand-up in 2021 after getting burned out from being a winemaker. I'd been doing live shows, and this joke I made about, ironically, AI stealing jobs went viral. The whole joke was about AI stealing jobs and people still blaming immigrants, which is very silly when the most powerful people were saying, "We're literally coming to take all your jobs."

Then a friend sent me the video of this lady doing the joke. He's like, "AI is for real, for real, stealing your jokes." It was basically me, in my clothes, but it's a 42-inch butt. It's just the pornification of women online. It was very strange.

I'd been doing that joke for a year. I thought of it after working out with my buddy, and we were talking, walking. It takes a lot of work to get a joke stage-ready. It's a lot of repetition, tweaking, driving from place to place to perform. Comedy's not easy. So it's pretty sad to see it happen, especially when the AI comedians who are stealing jokes have more followers than the people they're stealing from.

I asked the account behind the joke if she was real. She said yes. Then I asked, "Did someone help you do this?" And she just left me on read. She also left a comment saying, "Sorry, won't happen again," and removed a bunch of videos.

I've had a bunch of followers try to report it. Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram, replied and basically said, "Not all AI's bad. We don't know how we're going to stop it, but people shouldn't be able to steal. Seems like we should do something about that."

[This was Mosseri's exact comment: "I don't think it's practical for us to try and ban AI content from the platform. It's gonna be harder and harder to identify, and it's not all bad content (though yes, there is plenty of slop). But we are very invested in trying to drive more traffic to original content creators, and if an AI creator is ripping off content wholesale, it would be good for us to work out what we can do about that. I'm not sure what it would be, but I'll make sure to talk to the team and look into it."]

George Brett Olson, standup comedian
George Brett Olson is one of several comedians who have lately called out AI accounts for copying their jokes.

Max Brandt

I blame Meta, not the AI

I don't blame someone for stealing. That's just someone trying to make a buck with the tools they have available. We want to hold people responsible that do not have the mechanisms of power because we can't hold an institution accountable.

I feel demoralized more by Meta's response. The language that's coming from all of them is that we're powerless, and this is inevitable, and there's nothing we can do. 
And it's just not true. And you just have to sit, be powerless, which is demoralizing.

As a comedian, you just want to sell tickets to your shows, engage with live people. That's why most of us post on social media — so people see that you're funny so they come to your live shows. I do live shows every week.

If we flood the internet with agents, and we don't know the difference anymore between what's real and what's not, this could be the death of the internet. Hopefully more people come to live shows. Because the one thing about AI comedians is: You can't see them live.

Read the original article on Business Insider

‘They should pay more than the poor’: The battle to make California’s richest give up 5% of their fortunes

23 October 2026 at 12:56

Citadel is one of the most visited shopping centers in Los Angeles. But in these lean times, few customers browse its clothing, bag and shoe stores. On this hot October afternoon, Rocío López is here, treating herself to “a luxury” amid the cuts her family has made to blunt the impact every time they fill the car’s tank or do the grocery shopping. The pressure on her finances became clearer with her latest tax return: she and her husband were shocked to find they owed $8,000 to the IRS.

Seguir leyendo

© CHRIS TORRES (EFE)

Supporters at a rally for Proposition 40 in Los Angeles on October 5.

TSE dá 24 horas para Meta e X explicarem tratamento dado às campanhas

23 October 2026 at 12:15

O corregedor-geral eleitoral e ministro do TSE (tribunal Superior Eleitoral), Ricardo Villas Boas Cueva, determinou nesta sexta-feira (23) que a Meta e o X apresentem uma série de esclarecimentos e relatórios técnicos a respeito do uso de inteligência artificial, a distribuição de conteúdos políticos e a veiculação de anúncios eleitorais no perfil de candidatos. O prazo para a entrega do material é de 24 horas.

A decisão foi tomada no âmbito de uma ação movida pela coligação do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) que pede investigação sobre suposto favorecimento das plataformas à candidatura de Flávio Bolsonaro (PL).

Entre os esclarecimentos determinados à Meta estão relatórios que mostram se perfis ligados a Flávio e ao deputado Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG) receberam tratamento privilegiado, ajustes de ranqueamento ou exceções às regras normais de recomendação.

O ministro também pediu explicações sobre os critérios adotados pela empresa para a ordenação de GIFs e sugestões de hashtags no Instagram e WhatsApp.

O corregedor determinou ainda que a Meta submeta à revisão humana, caso ainda não tenha feito, a remoção do vídeo de divulgação do episódio “Flavinho de Papai”, da série Revelando, retirado do Instagram sob a justificativa de uso de inteligência artificial.

Ao X, o ministro exige relatório sobre os critérios e filtros aplicados pela inteligência artificial Grock em solicitações sobre os candidatos. Questiona também se ela gera conteúdos político-eleitorais sem provocação direta.

A campanha do presidente Lula pediu nesta semana uma investigação contra a Meta por descumprimento de decisões judiciais que determinam à plataforma isonomia de tratamento a conteúdos sobre o petista e seu adversário nas urnas, Flávio.

A peça menciona mensagens reveladas pela Folha de S. Paulo em que funcionários da companhia admitem restrições que prejudicam Lula e recomendação algorítmica de perfis relacionados a Flávio.

Bernie Sanders and Democratic lawmakers demand answers from Meta over alleged favoritism toward Bolsonaro in Brazil election

23 October 2026 at 11:54

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and 12 Democratic members of Congress on Thursday asked Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to explain the alleged unequal treatment by his main platforms (Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp) of the campaigns of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and far-right Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, who are facing off Sunday in the second round of Brazil’s presidential election. The final stretch of the campaign, tense amid polls predicting a technical tie, has been marked by alleged technical errors at Meta that have generally harmed the leftist leader.

Seguir leyendo

© CARLOS RAMIREZ (EFE)

Bernie Sanders at an event in Houston (Texas), part of his campaign tour across the United States.

Meta’s annus horribilis: Why it was hit with the largest fine ever imposed on a tech company

23 October 2026 at 10:03

2026 has not been a good year for Meta. On Wednesday, a judge in New Mexico ordered the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp to pay a fine of about $25 billion after finding it guilty of misleading Facebook users about its data privacy policies.

Seguir leyendo

© Carlos Barria (REUTERS)

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg puts on a Meta Ray-Ban smart glass at the corporate event Meta Connect, held on September 17.

Wait, the average Muse agent purchase is over $200? Tell me what you're buying!

23 October 2026 at 10:00
meta use billboard
Meta Muse, hard at work at spending your money.

Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

  • Meta says that over a quarter of Muse users made purchases with the AI agent.
  • The average order was over $200 — that's a lot of clams!
  • If this is you, please tell me what you're using it for.

Something just blew my mind, and I'm asking for your help to figure it out.

According to Meta's Q3 earnings call on Wednesday, more than a quarter of Muse users so far have used the AI agent make purchases — and the average order size is over $200.

I'll say that again: average order size over $200.

This is shocking to me, and I'm someone who has been actively and happily using Muse for a variety of things. I've been perfectly happy to give Muse access to my email, my calendar, my credit cards, and even my Apple health data.

But I've been slightly reticent about using it to actually buy stuff. Not that I'm totally worried about it getting stuff wrong (although the one purchase I did try to make with it was to order a salad for lunch, and it attempted to place the order on my HSA card after I failed to recognize the last 4 digits of that card, oops).

I think it's more I enjoy shopping online myself? I mean, for most things, I suppose. For "fun" stuff like clothes or personal items, I enjoy browsing and the hit of dopamine when you check out. (Others take this to the extreme, using "dopamine sites" that let you browse fake restaurants and "order" food that never arrives.) The other night I ordered — on a real site — cotton balls, razor blade refills, a plain white t-shirt, and a pair of scissors from the Target app while watching TV and even that boring purchase with a total under $30 gave me a small thrill. Why would I want to cede that joy to AI?

I understand, however, that not all purchases are fun. My colleague, Peter Kafka, used Muse to help him place an order for a new washing machine — the kind of purchase that is difficult to decide on, not particularly fun or exciting to make, and fairly expensive. Things like plane tickets, washing machines, or car insurance are in that category of stuff you have to buy, cost a lot of money, are fairly complicated to decide which option to buy, but bring very little joy during checkout.

I can understand why you might want to hand that off to an AI agent.

If you are using Muse to place big $$$ orders, what the heck are you buying?

My best guess here is that people are using Muse for airplane flights and hotels — the kind of big dollar items that are kind of annoying to book yourself, and you care mainly about just booking the right dates.

Am I right? You tell me!

Comment below, or you can email me at: knotopoulos@businessinsider.com. Or, you know, tell your Muse to email me.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Queda de vídeos, alcance e bloqueios: entenda ações eleitorais sobre a Meta

23 October 2026 at 08:00

A Meta, administradora do Instagram, Facebook e WhatsApp, vem ocupando papel central na discussão política das eleições deste ano. Desde o início do período eleitoral, a empresa vem sendo repetidamente acusada de tentar interferir no pleito, supostamente influenciando métricas dos candidatos de um lado e bloqueando conteúdos de outros. A big btech voltou ao centro do debate na última semana, quando surgiram novas denúncias de interferência, cobranças da Justiça eleitoral e a admissão da própria empresa de que há “falhas recorrentes” no controle do conteúdo.

Os episódios dos últimos dias envolveram o deputado federal Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG), o cantor MC Cabelinho, o MPF (Ministério Público Federal), o TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) e até mesmo congressistas democratas dos Estados Unidos, além dos candidatos à Presidência, Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) e Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT).

Nikolas Ferreira

Na última terça (20), o deputado federal Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG) relatou ter tido dificuldade para compartilhar um vídeo no Instagram. Segundo ele, seus seguidores tiveram problemas para compartilhar a publicação nos stories e, depois, o post ficou sem som.

O vídeo, em apoio à eleição do senador e candidato à Presidência Flávio Bolsonaro (PL), traz depoimentos de moradores da região Nordeste e tinha uma música do cantor Rubel com Xande de Pilares ao fundo.

Após a Meta informar que o áudio foi retirado por solicitação de direitos autorais, Nikolas acusou Rubel de tentar impedir a divulgação do vídeo, dizendo que o artista teria acionado a Sony Music Brasil, sua produtora, para derrubar o som. O cantor publicou foto nas redes sociais declarando apoio à reeleição do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT).

A CNN procurou o cantor e a produtora, mas não obteve retorno.

Nas diretrizes de direitos autorais disponíveis no site da Meta, a empresa informa que não se deve usar o trabalho de outra pessoa “se você não tem permissão para isso”. Segundo a companhia, o usuário pode infringir o uso dos direitos autorais mesmo dando crédito, comprando o conteúdo, e sem a intenção de violar o direito autoral.

Ainda de acordo com a empresa, caso algum conteúdo infrinja qualquer regra relacionada a direitos autorais, o usuário receberá uma notificação e a publicação será removida.

MPF endurece cobranças à Meta

Na quarta (21), o MPF (Ministério Público Federal) recomendou à Meta a adoção de medidas urgentes para garantir transparência e proteção à liberdade de expressão nas redes sociais durante o período eleitoral.

O órgão deu um prazo de 48 horas para que a empresa respondesse se vai seguir as recomendações e detalhar quais medidas serão tomadas. Também deu 30 dias para a companhia apresentar um relatório conclusivo.

O MPF pediu que a plataforma deixe de remover publicações, suspender contas sem fundamento jurídico ou contratual específico, e realizar bloqueios e restrições arbitrárias nas redes sociais.

Entidades que defendem maior transparência pública e organizações de tecnologia relataram que, desde setembro, a Meta vem removendo publicações e suspendendo perfis de forma expressiva. Os bloqueios teriam atingido diversos grupos, como estudantes, movimentos sociais, veículos de imprensa, comentaristas políticos e cidadãos.

Após a denúncia, o MPF questionou a Meta sobre a conduta, em 14 de outubro.

A companhia alegou ter bloqueado mais de 200 mil perfis de forma automática com base em critérios do período de silêncio eleitoral e identificação de uso de inteligência artificial em conteúdos políticos com presença de rostos.

Agora, o órgão voltou a cobrar a empresa após avaliar que as informações prestadas foram genéricas e insuficientes. De acordo com o MPF, grande parte dos bloqueios foi feito sem justificativa individualizada ou com base em enquadramentos indevidos em categorias graves, como terrorismo e exploração sexual infantil.

MC Cabelinho

Na quinta (22), a Meta removeu um vídeo publicado pelo cantor MC Cabelinho em parceria com o portal Revelando. A gravação abordava a acusação de Flávio Bolsonaro ter sido funcionário fantasma no gabinete do pai, o ex-presidente Jair Bolsonaro (PL), aos 19 anos.

O vídeo publicado por Cabelinho convidava os seguidores a assistirem ao conteúdo — que continua no ar — completo no YouTube.

Após a derrubada, o cantor questionou a empresa, que justificou que a remoção ocorreu após sinalização de que o conteúdo teria sido feito por inteligência artificial. O uso da tecnologia a 72 horas das eleições, no dia do pleito e no dia seguinte da votação fere as diretrizes de uso da plataforma, conforme comunicado.

A empresa ainda afirmou que a identificação do uso de IA pode ter ocorrido devido ao aplicativo usado para editar o vídeo, que pode usar a tecnologia no processo.

“Vale reforçar que muitos aplicativos de edição de imagem, vídeo e áudio usam recursos de IA e incorporam ao arquivo um sinal padrão da indústria indicando esse uso. A Meta lê esses sinais automaticamente e, para cumprir a determinação, indisponibiliza esses conteúdos no Brasil. Essas publicações voltam a ficar visíveis no país após o período definido pelo TSE”, escreveu.

Após o ocorrido, o artista, o portal Revelando e outros veículos voltaram a publicar o vídeo, que não apareceu mais com o selo de IA.

À CNN, o Calma Urgente, responsável pelo Revelando, reforçou que o vídeo não contém elementos de inteligência artificial.

Congressistas dos EUA

Como mostrou a CNN nesta quinta-feira (22), congressistas dos Estados Unidos enviaram uma carta ao CEO da Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, com questionamentos sobre o tratamento dado a Flávio e Lula durante as eleições brasileiras. O documento foi assinado por 12 deputados democratas e pelo senador independente Bernie Sanders.

No texto, parlamentares dizem que estão preocupados com relatos de que as plataformas da empresa estariam restringindo ou suprindo conteúdos associados à campanha do petista, enquanto estariam amplificando ou recomendando os associados à campanha de Flávio.

Os políticos dos EUA pontuaram que as redes americanas não devem influenciar nos resultados de eleições em outros países e pedem esclarecimentos sobre as acusações e adoção de medidas para garantir “condições de disputa equilibradas”.

A carta ocorre após a campanha de Lula alegar ter sido alvo de restrições na entrega de anúncios e de desabilitação da conta de anúncios. Além disso, especialistas independentes da ONU (Organização das Nações Unidas) também questionam a atuação da Meta nas eleições, e o MPF destaca que a empresa não cumpriu todas as medidas de isonomia eleitoral definidas pelo TSE.

A Meta, no entanto, continua a negar qualquer interferência no processo eleitoral.

Alcance “privilegiado”

Ainda na quinta, a Justiça Eleitoral deu 12 horas para a Meta explicar os motivos do alcance “privilegiado” dos perfis de Nikolas Ferreira (PL), Pablo Marçal (PRTB), Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) e o candidato a vice na sua chapa, Alfredo Gaspar (PL).

Em decisão, o ministro Ricardo Villas Bôas Cuevas, do TSE, exige que a empresa detalhe a origem das visualizações, a proporção de seguidores e não seguidores que viram as publicações e a quantidade de contas alcançadas.

A ordem atende a um pedido feito pela campanha de Lula, e o descumprimento do prazo pode levar a uma multa de R$ 100 mil por hora de atraso, o equivalente a R$ 2,4 milhões por dia.

No parecer, o ministro citou números do perfil de Nikolas no Twitter e disse que o alcance do deputado no Instagram exige “esclarecimentos técnicos acerca das métricas de distribuição”.

No mesmo dia, a Meta divulgou comunicado afirmando que “é o engajamento, e não o número de seguidores, que impulsiona o alcance e o desempenho de um conteúdo”.

Segundo a empresa, vídeos que acumulam visualizações, curtidas, comentários e compartilhamentos em pouco tempo são mais propensos a alcanças mais pessoas.

“Uma conta com um número relativamente pequeno de seguidores pode alcançar mais pessoas se uma parcela maior de seu público estiver ativa e visualizar, interagir, republicar ou compartilhar seu conteúdo”, diz a empresa.

Conforme a Meta, isso não representaria “qualquer tratamento preferencial”.

A nota foi divulgada após reportagem da Folha de S. Paulo mostrar que o vídeo de Nikolas Ferreira, mesmo depois de ficar sem áudio, alcançou 160 milhões de visualizações no Instagram. O número seria superior às visualizações em publicações de nomes conhecimentos mundialmente, como Neymar, Messi e Cristiano Ronaldo.

Meta nega favorecer candidatos

Na terça-feira (20), a Meta negou ao TSE que esteja descumprindo ordens do Tribunal durante o período eleitoral ou favorecendo candidaturas nas redes sociais.

Segundo a empresa, as plataformas aplicam as mesmas regras de distribuição de conteúdo para todos os candidatos e têm adotado uma série de medidas para evitar abusos, como a criação de uma lista de permissões para anúncios, que restringe a veiculação de propaganda eleitoral paga.

No mesmo dia, o Comitê de Supervisão da Meta afirmou que há “falhas recorrentes” no controle de conteúdo eleitoral nas redes administradas pela empresa. Também criticou o tratamento dado às contas de anúncios do presidente Lula e, em nota, os copresidentes do Comitê afirmaram que o episódio representa uma falha e deveria ter sido tratado por uma equipe interna de especialistas.

Eleições 2026: veja as principais datas do ano eleitoral

 

El año negro de Meta: las claves de la mayor multa a una tecnológica por cometer 43 millones de infracciones

23 October 2026 at 04:30

2026 no está siendo el mejor año para Meta. Un juez de Nuevo México, EE UU, ordenó este miércoles a la empresa matriz de Facebook, Instagram o WhatsApp el pago de una multa de unos 22.000 millones de euros al considerarla culpable de engañar a los usuarios de Facebook sobre su política de privacidad de datos.

Seguir leyendo

© Carlos Barria (REUTERS)

El director general de Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, se pone una gafas inteligentesMeta Ray-Ban Display en el evento corporativo Meta Connect, celebrado el pasado 17 de septiembre.

Huyan de las redes sociales: propuesta de objeción de conciencia

23 October 2026 at 04:30

Las redes sociales fueron recibidas hace 20 años como un gran espacio de libertad. Hoy en día ya sabemos que se han convertido en plataformas dedicadas a encubrir a delincuentes anónimos; en espacios que favorecen la mentira, la injuria y la calumnia, los mensajes de odio; que acogen los acosos sexuales y personales, la xenofobia, el machismo y el racismo, la pederastia, la pornografía infantil, los mensajes yihadistas; en lugares donde se permiten las suplantaciones de identidad (las últimas han sido las sufridas en cuentas del PP el pasado miércoles por los socialistas Begoña Gómez, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero y José Luis Ábalos, entre otros). Por si fuera poco, su maquinaria utiliza algoritmos con sesgos polarizadores y sus directivos aplican ingenierías fiscales para evadir impuestos en los países donde obtienen los ingresos.

Seguir leyendo

© Noah Berger (AP Photo / Lapresse) (EL PAÍS)

Dawson Kelly sostiene una pancarta con nombres de jóvenes que murieron supuestamente por su uso de las redes sociales. En Oakland, California, el pasado mes de agosto.

TSE dá 12h para Meta explicar alcance de perfis de Nikolas, Marçal e Flávio

22 October 2026 at 23:12

A Justiça Eleitoral determinou nesta quinta-feira (22) que a Meta, empresa responsável por Instagram, Facebook e WhatsApp, explique em até 12 horas os motivos do alcance “privilegiado” dos perfis de Nikolas Ferreira (PL), Pablo Marçal (PRTB), Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) e o candidato a vice na sua chapa, Alfredo Gaspar (PL).

A decisão, assinada pelo ministro do TSE (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral) Ricardo Villas Bôas Cuevas, exige que a empresa detalhe a origem das visualizações, a proporção de seguidores e não seguidores que viram as publicações e a quantidade de contas alcançadas. A ordem faz parte de uma ação movida pela campanha do presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT).

“Os dados deverão ser acompanhados de explicação objetiva das métricas de distribuição do alcance utilizadas, com identificação da origem das visualizações, da proporção proveniente de seguidores e não seguidores e das principais superfícies de distribuição, esclarecendo-se, na medida tecnicamente possível, a distinção entre visualizações, contas efetivamente alcançadas e reproduções repetidas, bem como eventuais limitações das informações fornecidas“, diz o texto.

O descumprimento do prazo poderá resultar em multa de R$ 100 mil por hora de atraso, o equivalente a R$ 2,4 milhões por dia.

Para justificar a ordem à Meta, Cuevas citou na decisão números do perfil de Nikolas Ferreira no X (antigo Twitter) e disse que o alcance dos posts do deputado no Instagram exige esclarecimento técnico.

Segundo a decisão, o perfil @nikolas_dm esteve entre 25 de agosto e 14 de outubro num filtro que impede a recomendação do candidato. Com o filtro ativo, os seguidores respondiam por entre 80% e 91% das impressões do perfil em setembro. Depois da retirada do filtro, entre 14 e 18 de outubro, essa fatia caiu para entre 28% e 41%.

Ou seja, após o filtro sair, a maior parte das visualizações passou a vir de não seguidores, o que, para o ministro, mostra a influência dos mecanismos de recomendação na circulação do conteúdo, e “reforça a necessidade de esclarecimentos técnicos acerca das métricas de distribuição e alcance“.

Em posicionamento divulgado nesta quinta-feira, a Meta afirmou que “é o engajamento, e não o número de seguidores, que impulsiona o alcance e o desempenho de um conteúdo“.

Segundo a plataforma, vídeos que acumulam visualizações, curtidas, comentários e compartilhamentos em pouco tempo tendem a alcançar mais usuários.

“Uma conta com um número relativamente pequeno de seguidores pode alcançar mais pessoas se uma parcela maior de seu público estiver ativa e visualizar, interagir, republicar ou compartilhar seu conteúdo“, diz a empresa, acrescentando que isso não representaria “qualquer tratamento preferencial“.

A justificativa da Meta veio após reportagem da Folha de S.Paulo mostrando que um vídeo, sem som, de Nikolas Ferreira sobre o Nordeste alcançou 160 milhões de visualizações no Instagram nesta quinta-feira, número superior ao de publicações de nomes como Neymar, Messi e Cristiano Ronaldo. A reportagem explica que quando o vídeo não tem som, isso pode reduzir o engajamento do público, mas não foi o que aconteceu.

Segundo o levantamento do jornal, Cristiano Ronaldo, que tem aproximadamente 679 milhões de seguidores, publicou neste ano apenas um vídeo com mais visualizações do que o vídeo de Nikolas. Já Messi, com cerca de 517 milhões de seguidores, e Neymar, com 241 milhões, têm dois vídeos cada um acima dessa marca. Nikolas tem 25 milhões de seguidores no Instagram

A Meta já havia sido instada a prestar esclarecimentos. Na terça-feira (20), a empresa negou favorecer candidatos e disse que plataformas sob sua gestão (Facebook, Instagram e WhatsApp) aplicam as mesmas regras de distribuição de conteúdo para todos os candidatos e têm adotado uma série de medidas para evitar abusos.

Na última semana, o TSE havia determinado que a Meta não interfira na distribuição de conteúdo político-eleitoral. A ordem vale até o fim do segundo turno, em 25 de outubro, sob pena de multa diária de R$ 500 mil.

Sharp drops for AI stocks overwhelm markets worldwide as oil prices jump

22 October 2026 at 22:50

Datacenter and chip costs fueled sharp decrease in AI sector although non-AI stocks still had a strong showing

The latest shudder for stocks in the AI industry pulled markets lower worldwide on Thursday, while oil prices hit their highest levels since May on worries about the war with Iran.

The S&P 500 fell 1.2% for its worst day since July, while the Nasdaq composite tumbled 2.6%. The weakness for tech stocks was so overwhelming that it masked strength for the rest of the US market, in which the majority of stocks actually rose. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 11 points, or less than 0.1%.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Richard Drew/AP

© Photograph: Richard Drew/AP

© Photograph: Richard Drew/AP

EUA: Deputados democratas questionam Meta sobre tratamento a Flávio e Lula

22 October 2026 at 22:31

Congressistas dos Estados Unidos enviaram uma carta direcionada a Mark Zuckerberg, CEO da Meta, com questionamentos sobre o tratamento dado a Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) e Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) em meio à disputa presidencial brasileira. O documento foi assinado por 12 deputados democratas e pelo senador independente Bernie Sanders.

O texto pontua que os parlamentares estão preocupados com relatos de que plataformas da empresa estariam restringindo ou suprimindo conteúdo associado à campanha de Lula, enquanto amplificariam ou recomendariam conteúdo associado à campanha de Flávio. A Meta é dona do WhatsApp, do Instagram e do Facebook.

A campanha do petista alega ser alvo de restrição na entrega de anúncios e de desabilitação da conta de anúncios, além de apontar aprovação de anúncios pagos do exterior sem rótulo, conteúdo sintético em período vedado e perfis de inteligência artificial.

Especialistas independentes da ONU também questionaram a atuação da Meta nas eleições brasileiras de 2026, e o Ministério Público Eleitoral do Brasil apontou que a companhia americana não cumpriu todas as medidas de isonomia eleitoral definidas pelo Tribunal Superior Eleitoral.

A Meta, entretanto, tem negado qualquer interferência no processo eleitoral ou favorecimento político e atribuiu os problemas relatados a questões técnicas.

“Considerando o papel fundamental que as redes sociais desempenham na comunicação política, é inaceitável que qualquer plataforma de rede social favoreça um candidato ou partido político em detrimento de outro, seja de forma deliberada ou inadvertida”, destacaram os políticos dos EUA.

Os congressistas americanos pontuaram que têm responsabilidade de garantir que plataformas de redes sociais americanas não influenciem os resultados de eleições em outros países.

“Instamos vocês a tomarem medidas imediatas para assegurar que, daqui em diante, os candidatos e suas respectivas campanhas em eleições democráticas recebam tratamento e acesso equitativos em suas plataformas”, ressaltaram.

Pediram esclarecimentos adicionais sobre as medidas tomadas pela Meta, além da adoção de providências para garantir “condições de disputa equilibradas” nas redes sociais.

Por fim, os congressistas solicitaram uma reunião de esclarecimento com a Meta para esta sexta-feira (23) e que a empresa responda a seis questionamentos até o dia 4 de novembro.

As perguntas incluem como a empresa orientou seus funcionários para gerenciar a moderação de conteúdo em eleições estrangeiras, incluindo as eleições brasileiras de 2026, e quais iniciativas ela adotou para cumprir as determinações do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral.

Além disso, questionam se a Meta permitirá que um auditor independente tenha acesso aos dados internos sobre moderação e distribuição, “especificamente os dados relacionados a conteúdo político referente às eleições brasileiras” para confirmar se há tratamento igualitário aos candidatos em suas plataformas.

Questionamento é feito em meio a período eleitoral nos EUA

Os questionamentos dos congressistas americanos relacionados à eleição no Brasil são feitos em meio ao próprio período eleitoral: democratas e republicanos se preparam para a disputa das Midterms, as Eleições de Meio de Mandato, que renovarão a Câmara e o Senado em 3 de novembro.

Uma fonte ligada ao Congresso dos Estados Unidos afirmou à CNN Brasil que esse fator, assim como a agilidade com que os políticos se mobilizaram, demonstra preocupação genuína com o cenário no Brasil e a atuação da Meta.

“O que torna esta carta particularmente significativa é a rapidez com que os membros do Congresso se mobilizaram para elaborá-la e divulgá-la, especialmente na reta final das eleições de meio de mandato, momento em que, compreensivelmente, sua atenção está voltada para as campanhas eleitorais”, destacou a fonte.

“O fato de terem se disposto a agir com tamanha agilidade, apesar de suas agendas extremamente lotadas, demonstra o quanto levam a sério essas preocupações”, adicionou.

❌