❌

Reading view

Emma Bonino, l’iperliberista globale

Emma Bonino ha meritato l’inferno anche  per questo:

ha promosso il referendum per l’abolizione dell’art. 18 dello Statuto dei Lavoratori (perché irrigidiva il mercato del lavoro).

Ha promosso referendum per la piena liberalizzazione del collocamento privato abolendo ogni vincolo e responsabilità del datore di lavoro.

Ha sostenuto la piena libertà di contratto individuale (quali che siano i rapporti di potere contrattuale) e l’abolizione dei contratti collettivi.

Ha sostenuto l’abolizione dell’obbligo di stipulare assicurazioni contro gli infortuni sul lavoro con l’INAIL aprendo alle assicurazioni private.

Ha sostenuto l’abolizione del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale, da sostituire con assicurazioni private.

Ha sostenuto costantemente l’innalzamento dell’età minima per accedere alla pensione.

Lei, la libertaria, era favorevolissima al Green Pass, che riteneva essere un grande contributo civile.

Si è sempre definita un’amica sincera di Israele e ha sostenuto tutte le iniziative del sionismo.

Ha supportato dal primo minuto e fino alla fine l’invio di aiuti militari a Kiev e la necessità di dare una lezione alla Russia.

È sempre stata ferocemente atlantista e filoamericana.

Non si può dire che non sia stata una vita coronata di successi, magari indiretti.

In vista dei coccodrilli che pioveranno in questi giorni, credo sia corretto dire che Emma Bonino, dal punto di vista della gente che vive del proprio lavoro e che ama l’Italia, è stata politicamente il Male.

Niente di personale, se la vedrà lei dall’altra parte.

Ma per quanto riguarda questa valle di lacrime, se avesse fatto la cassiera invece della parlamentare l’intero paese ne avrebbe tratto beneficio.

Andrea Zhok

L'articolo Emma Bonino, l’iperliberista globale proviene da Blondet & Friends.

  •  

RAS#9: porque “a Cultura não pede licença”

Ana Marta Teles, Daniela Monteiro, Filipa Carmo, Helena Mendes, Iacuba Camará, Luis Garza, Marisa Murtinha, Nuno Labau, Sílvia Ferreira e Vânia Jorge foram os artistas que participaram na residência artística RAS#9 que decorreu no Centro Cultural Regional de Santarém (CCRS). O projecto RAS nasceu há cerca de nove anos pelas mãos de João Maria Ferreira, Elias Rodrigues, o então presidente do CCRS…

Source

  •  

Exclusive: ‘The Portuguese people are tired of feeling like foreigners in their own homeland’ – New poll shows Reconquista could win 5.2% of the national vote

The right-wing Portuguese Reconquista movement would win 5.2 percent of the national vote if it were to register as a political party, according to independent polling firm Intercampus. Remigration activist Afonso Gonçalves, who founded Reconquista, told Remix News that the poll shows the remigration movement could garner significant support from Portuguese voters who have grown tired mass immigration.

“Despite all the lies, slander, false accusations and tyrannical state persecution, Reconquista and its founder are currently polling at 5.2 percent without even being a registered political party yet. The Portuguese people are tired of feeling like foreigners in their own homeland. We will not be ignored any longer,” Gonçalves told Remix News.

Mass immigration is the number one issue driving the growth of the remigration right across Europe. In Portugal, the demographic change has not only been dramatic but also extremely rapid compared to other Europe countries.

“The foreign population has doubled in the last six or seven years, and in the last 12 years it has tripled, because in 2014, we had around 400,000 legal immigrants, already a few hundred thousand — like 600,000 or 700,000 —naturalized citizens that are from an immigrant background. So, in total, we had just short of 1 million immigrants if you count naturalized citizens. So, it has tripled in 12 years and doubled in six years,” said Gonçalves.

In total, the Reconquista founder said there are 3 million foreigners or people with an immigration background in the country, including 2 million legal immigrants and 900,000 people who already acquired citizenship. On top of that, there are approximately 100,000 illegal immigrants.

The polling data shows, however, that Reconquista has most of its support from young people, a trend seen in other European countries, including Germany and France. However, even among the general population, the favorability rating for Reconquista is at 27 to 28 percent, which means the party has ample runway for growth.

“If you consider the people who have a very positive or positive opinion about us, that is almost one-third among the youth, so 18 to 34, and in the overall population it’s at 27 percent or 28 percent,” he said.

This support may also have to do with Gonçalves’ high-profile social media actions, which have gone viral on numerous social media platforms.

🇵🇹🔴 Portuguese activist @AfonsoJFG was detained by police for protesting against mass immigration.

"Not in our country! Portugal belongs to the Portuguese people!"

Gonçalves was detained by police for an hour and released. He was never charged, but was actively protesting… pic.twitter.com/MkyQv2R8ue

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) September 18, 2025

It is important to note that Gonçalves said his movement is not yet actually a party, however, the poll is serving as a sort of public litmus test to gauge how such a party would perform in a general election in Portugal.

Meanwhile, Gonçalves said his movement has built strong relationships with other parties in Europe.

“We have very strong and friendly relationships with Alternative for Germany. We also have friendly ties with Vox in Spain, Restore Britain in the United Kingdom, so I would say that these are our biggest and strongest connections internationally,” he said.

🇵🇹❕ "The Portuguese never asked to be replaced by hundreds of thousands of invaders who don't share their culture, religion, or way of life."

Portuguese activist @AfonsoJFG was arrested for peacefully protesting this Islamist procession in Almada. pic.twitter.com/NsNobHjXkM

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) July 8, 2025

His potential party would mark a major sea change in “business as usual” on the right-wing spectrum of parties that already exist in Portugal, especially in relation to the Chega party. Notably, Reconquista takes a strong stand against immigration from former Portuguese colonies and is opposed to legal immigration.

“We are different because we are formally defending remigration. Chega just defends controlling migration; we defend reverting and inverting the immigration influxes. We defend remigration, and we also criticize migration from our former colonies – so countries like Angola, Mozambique, Brazil, Cape Verde, etc. These countries are the highest representatives in terms of immigration to Portugal. Chega doesn’t criticize them because they want to attract their votes,” he said.

Gonçalves noted that immigration from these countries represents major problems, as “they represent the highest per capita levels of criminality, representation amongst people who are jailed, and also the highest absolute numbers of immigrants to Portugal.”

Gonçalves warned that these groups “are also the most heavily politicized, they despise our history, and a lot of them feel a sense of vengeance against our people and form an ethnic bloc of voting that has the potential of turning the Portuguese liberal democracy into a tribalistic, let’s say, Balkanized democracy that doesn’t serve the will of the people, for sure at least not the will of the native people.”

Major challenges still exist for Gonçalves and any potential party. For example, while he has garnered ample attention on social media, that attention has also brought censorship, persecution from the Portuguese state, and an authoritarian debanking blitz. In short, he is arguably the most persecuted political activist in Portugal and among the most persecuted in all of Europe.

“Our movement is censored on YouTube and TikTok. So for example, me, I have lost four YouTube accounts and 16 TikTok accounts, and I’ve never been able to regain access to these accounts. Regarding other types of censorship and persecution, we’re being heavily, tyrannically persecuted by the Portuguese state. I have been debanked; I’ve lost access to all of my Portuguese-based bank accounts, the funds were frozen, and I’m not allowed to open a new bank account. So I’m very heavily censored in terms of banking. I’ve also been deplatformed, we’ve been illegally detained, we’ve had our events illegally disallowed, and we are persecuted by the Portuguese regime in that way,” he said.

Starting a party under such conditions represents a major challenge, however, founding a party could help formalize Gonçalves’ movement and create a venue where he can more powerfully pursue a remigration agenda. After all, it is generally easier to ban, debank, and censor an individual than an entire political party.

With remigration as his core issue, his party will have a sharp wedge issue to peel off voters from other rival parties. Remix News has conducted interviews with Chega officials in the past, including party leader André Ventura. He signaled he is open to some legal immigration to support certain industries.

“I don’t know how it is in all the countries, but in countries like Portugal, Spain, and even France and Italy, countries that I know best, the economy needs some level of immigration for areas like agriculture or tourism, hotels, and restaurants. With massive tourism activity, we need some immigration, but massive illegal immigration or even massive immigration, both legal and illegal, can both bring problems,” Ventura told Remix News at the time.

However, Gonçalves has long argued that it is this type of legal immigration that is contributing to the greatest demographic upheaval in Portugal. While the polling data shows there is a pool of receptive voters, there are also powerful business and lobbying interests involved in tourism, construction, agriculture, and other industries who will actively oppose remigration.

The poll was conducted by the independent pollster Intercampus and commissioned by Reconquista. As Gonçalves noted, it is the “most famous, the most credible” polling agency in the country, but he says they have a tendency to undervalue right-wing parties, which he says could be a sign that support for his party could be even higher than 5.2 percent.

The post Exclusive: ‘The Portuguese people are tired of feeling like foreigners in their own homeland’ – New poll shows Reconquista could win 5.2% of the national vote appeared first on Remix News.

  •  

Novas Regras na VCI: Proibição de Pesados de Mercadorias Entra em Vigor a 15 de Setembro

A partir do dia 15 de setembro, entram em vigor novas restrições de trânsito na Via de Cintura Interna (VCI), no Porto. A medida visa redistribuir os fluxos de tráfego, reforçar a segurança e diminuir a pressão sobre esta artéria fundamental da Área Metropolitana do Porto, segundo o Decreto-Lei n.º 155-A/2026.

As limitações aplicam-se nos dias úteis, entre as 07h00 e as 21h00, a todos os veículos pesados de mercadorias com peso bruto superior a 3.500 kg, que possuam três ou mais eixos e uma altura igual ou superior a 1,1 metros no primeiro eixo.

Principais Pontos da Nova Medida:

* Período de Restrição: Dias úteis, das 07h00 às 21h00.
* Exceções e Autorizações: Veículos que realizem operações de carga ou descarga nos concelhos do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia podem circular, desde que efetuem um registo prévio e obtenham habilitação na plataforma digital dos respetivos municípios, apresentando o devido documento de transporte.

Serviços Online https://share.google/xK4JKPfyY4fjl7y3j

Balcão Virtual https://share.google/JjA11ky9QxuVQgBrk


* Alternativa Gratuita (CREP): Como alternativa de circulação, a Circular Regional Exterior do Porto (A41/IC24) dispõe de isenção total do pagamento de portagens para este tipo de veículos, aplicável 24 horas por dia, sem necessidade de registo prévio.
* Fiscalização e Sanções: A fiscalização estará a cargo da PSP e da GNR, com acesso em tempo real à plataforma de registos. O incumprimento das regras constitui contraordenação punível segundo o Código da Estrada, sob alçada da ANSR.

Tratando-se de um projeto-piloto, a iniciativa será alvo de uma monitorização contínua para avaliar os impactos na mobilidade da região.

Regulamentos e Formulários
Voltar
Regulamentos
Formulários
Ouvir
Regime de circulação na VCI e isenção de pagamento das taxas de portagem na CREP


A VCI é uma das principais artérias rodoviárias da Área Metropolitana do Porto, mas o elevado volume de tráfego coloca desafios crescentes à mobilidade, à segurança e à sustentabilidade da região.



Para responder a este desafio, está em marcha uma nova solução para redistribuir o tráfego, aliviar a pressão sobre a VCI e potenciar a utilização da CREP, promovendo uma circulação mais fluida e eficiente na rede rodoviária da Área Metropolitana do Porto.



A partir de 15 de setembro, entram em vigor novas regras de circulação para os veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI.



Saiba o que muda, quem é abrangido e quais as alternativas disponíveis.







A Via de Cintura Interna do Porto (VCI), que integra troços das autoestradas A1/IC1, A20/IC23, A28/IC1 e A44/IC23, formando um anel em torno dos núcleos urbanos das cidades do Porto e de Vila Nova de Gaia, é uma das principais infraestruturas rodoviárias da Área Metropolitana do Porto. Todos os dias, milhares de pessoas e veículos utilizam esta via, essencial para a ligação entre o Porto, Vila Nova de Gaia e os principais eixos rodoviários da região e do País.



O elevado volume de tráfego, em particular a circulação de veículos pesados de mercadorias, tem vindo a colocar uma pressão significativa sobre a VCI, com impacto na fluidez da circulação, na segurança rodoviária e na sustentabilidade ambiental.



Uma rede mais equilibrada
A Área Metropolitana do Porto dispõe de outras vias com capacidade disponível que podem contribuir para uma distribuição mais eficiente do tráfego. É o caso da A41/IC24, a Circular Regional Exterior do Porto (CREP), que constitui uma alternativa para a circulação de veículos pesados e permite reforçar a articulação entre os diferentes eixos rodoviários da região.



É neste contexto que o Governo, através do Decreto-Lei n.º 155-A/2026, de 31 de julho, definiu uma solução global para melhorar a gestão dos fluxos de tráfego na Área Metropolitana do Porto.



O objetivo é claro: aliviar a pressão sobre a VCI, promover uma utilização mais equilibrada da rede rodoviária existente e contribuir para uma mobilidade mais segura, eficiente e sustentável.



O que vai mudar?
A partir de 15 de setembro, a circulação de determinados veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI ficará condicionada nos dias úteis, entre as 07h00 e as 21h00.



A medida aplica-se a veículos de mercadorias com peso bruto superior a 3.500 kg, três ou mais eixos e altura igual ou superior a 1,1 metros, medida na vertical do primeiro eixo.



Existem, contudo, exceções. Os veículos abrangidos que tenham como origem ou destino os municípios do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia, para operações de carga ou descarga nesses municípios, poderão circular na VCI, desde que estejam previamente habilitados através da plataforma digital disponibilizada pelos respetivos municípios.



A CREP como alternativa
Para facilitar a redistribuição do tráfego, está também previsto um regime de isenção do pagamento de portagens na CREP para os veículos abrangidos pela medida.



Esta solução permite reforçar a utilização de uma via com capacidade disponível, criando uma alternativa competitiva para o transporte de mercadorias e contribuindo para uma distribuição mais equilibrada dos fluxos de tráfego na região, em especial para o tráfego que pretenda atravessar o Porto através da VCI.



O regime de isenção de portagens na CREP entrou em vigor a 1 de janeiro de 2026.



Uma solução acompanhada de perto
A implementação destas medidas será acompanhada através de monitorização contínua, permitindo avaliar os seus resultados e, sempre que necessário, ajustar ou complementar as soluções adotadas.



Mais do que uma alteração às regras de circulação, esta é uma medida que procura melhorar o funcionamento de toda a rede rodoviária, aproveitando a capacidade instalada da Rede Rodoviária existente, reforçando a mobilidade, a segurança e a sustentabilidade na Área Metropolitana do Porto.



Consulte abaixo toda a informação sobre as novas regras, os veículos abrangidos, as exceções e as alternativas disponíveis.





Perguntas Frequentes


O que vai mudar na VCI?

A partir de 15 de setembro será proibida a circulação a veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI (IC1/IC23), entre as 07h00 e as 21h00, nos dias úteis.



Que veículos são abrangidos pelo regime excecional de proibição de circulação na VCI?

Para este efeito, entende-se por “veículos pesados de mercadorias” os veículos com peso bruto superior a 3500 kg, com três ou mais eixos, e com altura, medida na vertical do primeiro eixo, igual ou superior a 1,1 m, que se destinam ao transporte de mercadorias, por conta própria ou de outrem.



A proibição aplica-se 24 horas por dia?

Não. A proibição aplica-se num período definido do dia útil, das 07h00 às 21h00, concentrando-se nas horas de maior intensidade de tráfego.



Está prevista alguma exceção?

Sim, estão excecionados da proibição, i.e. podem circular a qualquer hora do dia na VCI, os veículos pesados de mercadorias que tenham como origem ou destino os municípios do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia, para efeitos de carga ou descarga de mercadorias, desde que previamente habilitados através de um registo na plataforma digital disponibilizada pelos municípios do Porto e de Vila Nova de Gaia.



Como é que é obtida a habilitação de circulação?

Para que os veículos excecionados possam circular na VCI, dentro do horário em que se aplica a interdição, deve ser previamente obtida a habilitação de circulação, para cada movimento de transporte, através de um registo na plataforma digital disponibilizada pelos municípios do Porto e de Vila Nova de Gaia.



O processo de habilitação inclui, para além do preenchimento de um formulário, a submissão de um documento de transporte, tal como definido na alínea b) do n.º 1 do artigo 2.º do anexo ao Decreto-Lei n.º 147/2003, de 11 de julho.



O documento de transporte deve indicar, pelo menos, o local de carga e descarga da mercadoria, a data e hora em que se inicia o transporte e a matrícula do respetivo veículo e o código de identificação atribuído pela Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira. Nas situações em que o documento de transporte não tenha código de identificação, em virtude de o mesmo não ser legalmente exigido, a habilitação deve prosseguir sem esse código.



Após submissão do formulário e da documentação referida, é gerado um registo pela plataforma, que serve de comprovativo de habilitação para circulação na VCI, registo esse que deve ser apresentado às autoridades policiais competentes para verificação da regularidade da circulação.



A eventual anulação de um pedido de habilitação efetuado na Plataforma deve, de igual modo, ser registada por essa via.



Em caso de dificuldades com a Plataforma quem devo contactar?

Em caso de dificuldades com a Plataforma, contacte:

Linha Porto. — 220 100 220 (dias úteis, das 9 às 19 horas)
suporte.acessovci@portodigital.pt  (endereço destinado exclusivamente ao reporte de anomalias ou problemas técnicos da plataforma)


Que alternativa existe para os veículos pesados de mercadorias?

A alternativa recomendada é a CREP (A41/IC24), Circular Regional Externa da Área Metropolitana do Porto, onde será aplicada a isenção de pagamento de portagens para os veículos abrangidos pela medida.



Como funciona a isenção de portagens na CREP?

Todos os veículos com três ou mais eixos, e altura, medida na vertical do primeiro eixo, igual ou superior a 1,1 m, beneficiam de isenção do pagamento das taxas de portagem na autoestrada A41/IC24.

A isenção aplica-se todos os dias, 24h, não sendo precisa qualquer habilitação.



Como vou saber, na estrada, que existe esta proibição?

Em pleno cumprimento do estabelecido no Regulamento de Sinalização de Trânsito (RST), encontra-se instalada, nas vias de entrada na VCI, sinalização vertical de código (sinal C3d) e painéis adicionais, com a indicação: “Exceto veículos autorizados” e “Dias úteis, das 07h às 21h”. Essa sinalização será complementada com painéis informativos nos principais acessos á VCI e, sempre que se justifique, por marcas rodoviárias no pavimento.



Como será feita a fiscalização?

A fiscalização da circulação na VCI é feita pelas autoridades policiais competentes (PSP e GNR), em articulação com os municípios e demais entidades responsáveis.



Para exercício dos poderes de fiscalização das infrações resultantes do incumprimento das restrições de trânsito estabelecidas, as autoridades policiais têm acesso à Plataforma, em tempo real, para a verificação da regularidade da circulação dos veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI.



Sem prejuízo, podem os munícios do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia, conforme aplicável, retirar ou invalidar o registo decorrente do processo de habilitação, por identificação de desconformidades entre o preenchimento do formulário e a documentação submetida ou por falsidade ou insuficiência desta última.



A infração ao regime de proibição é punível por Lei?

Sim, a violação do regime de proibição da circulação na VCI constitui uma contraordenação, punível nos termos fixados no n.º 4 do artigo 10.º do Código da Estrada.

A competência para processamento das contraordenações, e respetiva aplicação das coimas e sanções, cabe à ANSR, nos termos previstos no Código da Estrada e, subsidiariamente, no regime geral das contraordenações.



A medida é definitiva?

Trata-se de uma medida que deve ser encarada como um projeto-piloto que será objeto de monitorização contínua, para efeitos de avaliação da sua eficácia e, se necessário, adequação das mesmas através de medidas complementares.

Por: Dino Frazão

13/09/2026



Se gostou do que leu e ainda não é seguidor, siga a nossa página para ver mais conteúdos!

————————————————–
© 2026 Os Monhacas. Todos os direitos reservados.
Este é um projeto independente de criação de conteúdos.
Se gostou do que leu e ainda não é seguidor, siga a nossa página para ver mais conteúdos!
————————————————–

O conteúdo Novas Regras na VCI: Proibição de Pesados de Mercadorias Entra em Vigor a 15 de Setembro aparece primeiro em OS MONHACAS.

  •  

25th Anniversary of 9/11 Prompts Debate Over the Attack's Legacy

Outlets across the spectrum weigh in with perspectives on the 25th anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks.

"Look Away": Opinion writer Liz Peek (Lean Right bias) for LizPeek.com (Lean Right) said "there are many in our country who want us to pretend that the greatest attack on the United States since Pearl Harbor never happened." According to Peek, "They want us to look away from the Muslim terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and who drove another plane full of innocents to their deaths in a grassy Pennsylvania field. They want us to forget that on that day in 2001, Americans came under attack for reasons that few understood, from a far away people who loathe our culture, our freedoms and our country." Peek added that "When Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., dismissively says, 'Some people did something,' she is trying to erase the truth. She wants us to forget who it was who purposefully killed 2,977 people." Peek urged that "Americans must not tolerate this rewriting of recent history," saying that "Twenty-five years later, we still mourn the friends we lost, the brave first responders who made the ultimate sacrifice, and thousands of others who died at Ground Zero."

"Bigoted Glass Ceiling": Dr. Jalal Baig, writing opinion for MS Now (Left), said that since the morning of September 11, 2001, "Islam became synonymous with terrorism in much of the American public's collective imagination," adding that "the effects of widespread Islamophobia have touched my life intimately." Even 25 years later, "Islamophobia remains a mainstream feature in American politics" according to Baig, who said "disgusting Islamophobic statements have been routinely uttered at the highest levels of government." She highlighted the "political rise of both Zohran Mamdani and Abdul El-Sayed," saying they have "challenged a bigoted glass ceiling," and that many of the "attacks against them remind us of the continued chasm between the nation's ideals and its sobering reality."

"Lost Sight": Opinion writer Jay Rogers (Lean Right) for The Hill (Center) worked in the World Trade Center for just over a year. He still thinks about "how ordinary that building felt to me once, and how it became the opening scene of a war most Americans didn't know they were already losing." Rogers said, "Osama bin Laden was a known, growing threat before 2001, and the government had chances to remove him it didn't take." According to Rogers, the cause "was a legally cautious, capture-first policy, shaped by an assassination ban dating back to Gerald Ford," adding that it "was a mindset left over from treating terrorism as a criminal justice and law enforcement question." 25 years later, the same complacency, Rogers said, "shows up closer to home now," explaining that "four years of open borders brought gangsters and traffickers into our neighborhoods. Socialism is on the rise nationwide—gaining ground where it would have been laughed out a generation ago—because too many have lost sight of what makes this country worth defending." Rogers laments, saying "My old office tower is gone. My neighbor is gone. The only tribute worth giving either of them is to keep the country's defenses—physical and cultural—current, not nostalgic."

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary.

  •  

CDC Declares End to Cyclospora Outbreak Despite Ongoing Investigations

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued its "final update" on the Cyclospora outbreak reportedly caused by Taylor Farms de Mexico's shredded iceberg lettuce.

The Details: "This outbreak has ended," the CDC declared on Friday. "The contaminated lettuce linked to this outbreak is no longer available in stores or restaurants… As of September 11, 2026, FDA continues to investigate the cause of the contamination." The lettuce was recalled in mid-July.

RELATED: Are Food Recalls Really on the Rise? | AllSides

The agency also updated its general data hub about the parasite and said that while "cyclosporiasis season" in the US is May through August, it "continues to identify and investigate additional cases beyond this date" due to delayed reporting.

The CDC cited "19,595 laboratory-confirmed cases of cyclosporiasis acquired in the US," along with thousands of others that may have been acquired outside the US or are not laboratory-confirmed. "For comparison," it said, "1,180 cases were reported in the US between May 1 and August 31, 2025" and further noted, "The true number of people sick with cyclosporiasis is likely higher than the number reported."

Questions Remain: Outlets across the political spectrum highlighted several ongoing questions pertaining to the case. Associated Press (Lean Left bias) emphasized, "it still isn't clear how sewage could have contaminated enough food to sicken so many people," and Newsweek (Center) furthered, "scientists never identified a Cyclospora-positive lettuce sample. And although lettuce emerged as the leading suspect based on epidemiological and traceback evidence, the precise point at which contamination occurred may never be known." Newsweek also criticized that "no definitive source was ever identified" in many of the additional cases (though investigations are reportedly ongoing).

New York Post (Right) highlighted conflicting reports from Taylor Farms and the FDA: "Taylor Farms initially challenged the government's findings that its lettuce was contaminated and claimed the FDA 'apologized' to them about conflicting test results for its produce, adding that the agency made a 'mistake.' The FDA insisted that it did not apologize to Taylor Farms, noting that the company recalled 236,192 cases of salad due to potential contamination."

Differences In Framing: While Associated Press emphasized the outbreak as the "largest" in US history, Newsweek more accurately called it the "largest known" in US history. And while New York Post focused its report on a new multistate outbreak of salmonella, Associated Press linked the cyclosporiasis outbreak to "a worsening problem: US regulators are conducting fewer international inspections to catch contaminated produce before it lands on American plates" – a recent narrative consistent on the left.

RELATED: RFK Jr. Urges Healthier Diet, Politico Says Cyclospora Outbreak Hinders Effort | AllSides

Written by the AllSides staff (of humans). Learn more. Support our mission. Suggest an improvement to this summary. Image Credit: CDC

  •  

First-Ever Kill Of A Drone Boat By Another Drone Boat Claimed By Ukraine

The Ukrainian Navy is claiming one of its uncrewed surface vessels (USV) sank a Russian USV, marking the first time one of these weapons, also known as drone boats, destroyed another. The engagement is the latest iteration in the use of combat drone boats, which Ukraine has employed to devastating effect against Russia’s Black Sea Fleet vessels and facilities, forcing the general evacuation of Russian naval assets from occupied Crimea to bases in Russia proper. The use of weaponized USVs is now proliferating around the globe at an increasing rate.

The incident took place somewhere in the Black Sea, said the Ukrainian Navy, which provided no details about when it happened or exactly where. TWZ cannot independently verify this claim; however, we cannot find any evidence of a drone boat killing another drone boat in the past.

“Units of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR) detected the target,” the Ukrainian Navy stated on Telegram. “The Ukrainian Navy’s ‘Sargan 3000’ unmanned boat, equipped with a remotely operated weapon station (RWS) Protector 12.7 mm, successfully destroyed it. This is the first naval battle in history between unmanned boats.”

An 81-second video released by the Ukrainian Navy opens with a view from the Sargan 3000’s onboard camera. It shows the Ukrainian USV acquiring, then engaging the Russian USV with its machine gun. It then cuts to a closer view of the Protector gun system firing at the Russian drone boat. At about the 30-second mark, the view switches to a feed from an aerial platform, though it is unclear if it is piloted or a drone. The video continues with the Sargan 3000 raking the Russian USV with its heavy machine gun until pieces start flying off and it eventually sinks, stern first.

Ukraine's Navy says a Sargan unmanned surface vessel destroyed a Russian unmanned boat with machine-gun fire in the Black Sea, the first-ever battle between unmanned surface vessels. Ukrainian Navy personnel operated in coordination with HUR. #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/Avg4ecz8m6

— NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 (@NOELreports) September 12, 2026

The Sargan 3000 (the name means needlefish in Ukrainian) was first introduced by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in April as a “multi-purpose platform that has undergone testing and entered service with the Ukrainian Navy. These uncrewed vessels are highly maneuverable and capable of carrying out strike missions.”

Though initially designed as a kamikaze weapon, it evolved into a platform for remote-controlled weapons, according to the Russian AmalNews outlet.

“The maritime drone features a specialized low-profile hull with distinctive hydrodynamic lines and is constructed from materials that reduce its radar signature,” the publication explained. “The Sargan-3000 USV is equipped with a waterjet propulsion system (presumably powered by a diesel or hybrid engine to ensure a long operational range).”

AmalNews states that the Sargan 3000 is 6.9 meters (about 22.6 feet) long, 2.2 meters (about 7.2 feet) wide, with an operational radius of up to 1,600 km (about 994 miles) and can carry a payload of 450 kg (about 992 pounds). It travels at an estimated speed range of 40-55 knots.

During operations, the Sargan 3000 connects to Ukraine’s Delta situational awareness system, “enabling the real-time transmission of target data, video feeds, and telemetry to operators,” AmalNews noted. “It features multi-channel control capabilities, including redundant satellite communication terminals (utilizing secure Western commercial networks and NATO military networks).”

It is also equipped with “an autonomous inertial and optical navigation system to ensure operation in the event of GPS jamming, and it incorporates electronic countermeasures (ECM) modules.”

There are several variants of this USV. They include those equipped with machine guns; rockets; FPV drones; an electronic warfare version and one that lays mines, the publication added.

Ukraine’s Sargan-3000 naval drone was presented in an FPV drone carrier variant, additionally fitted with a remote weapon station. The type first appeared in combat conditions in early June, when one washed ashore and detonated in the waters of Romania’s Constanța port. #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/QyKnyJFqUq

— NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 (@NOELreports) July 5, 2026

The Sargan 3000’s Protector remote weapon station is made by Kongsberg.

The drone boat’s first publicly known combat engagement took place in July, when one “destroyed the Russian Federation’s FSB border guard ship Izumrud,” the Ukrainian Navy stated at the time.

“Ukrainian naval sailors sank the border guard ship of the 2nd rank with the Sargan-3000 maritime unmanned complex near Novorossiysk,” the Ukrainian Navy claimed on Facebook. “Among the crew of the ship are dead and wounded.”

It is unclear whether the USV acted as a kamikaze vessel or a weapons platform, although the former is most likely.

“It was Izumrud that on November 25, 2018, participated in the attack on the ships of the Ukrainian Navy in the Kerch Strait,” the service added. “Revenge is inevitable.”

Ukraine's Navy has sunk the Russian FSB Border Guard patrol ship Izumrud near Novorossiysk using the Sargan-3000 unmanned maritime system.

The vessel, a Rank 2 patrol ship, reportedly sustained catastrophic damage, with casualties and injuries among its crew.

The Izumrud was… pic.twitter.com/7VjKDH2ReD

— SPRAVDI — Stratcom Centre (@StratcomCentre) July 14, 2026

One sea drone killing another is a notable development given the damage these systems can inflict and the challenge of locating and destroying them on open waters. Being able to operate on the water over long distances and timeframes, they can be used to hunt down other drone boats, as what appears to have taken place in this engagement, or serve as a picket line of sorts to protect harbors, vessels and other targets that have been attacked by USVs in the past.

The Russian drone boat, which is not identified, did not appear to be armed.

The Houthi rebels of Yemen actually pioneered the operational use of kamikaze USVs years ago. We first reported about this capability in January 2017, when an explosive-laden Houthi USV struck a Saudi frigate. Before that, Iran developed various crude kamikaze USVs and those capabilities soon migrated to its Houthi proxies, which put them to use in the Red Sea for the first time.

Ukraine has led the way in advancements of these systems, first employing them as kamikaze weapons, but then adding machine guns and rockets and later missiles, which were used to shoot down Russian helicopters and jets. Ukraine has also used these to launch FPV and bomber drone attacks as well as deliver uncrewed ground vehicles (UGV) into enemy territory.

You can see that delivery in the following video.

No soldiers. Just machines.

Ukraine has carried out the world's first known combat mission in which a sea drone transported and deployed an armed ground robot behind Russian lines on the occupied Kinburn Spit. pic.twitter.com/zyJdFXWxVb

— Ivan Khomenko (@KhomenkoIv60065) July 13, 2026

In the wake of the Ukrainian success with these weapons, Russia developed its own drone boats, and in August 2025, launched its first attack on a Ukrainian vessel.

The U.S. used drone boats as kamikaze weapons for the first time in July, during an attack “on a submarine and ship maintenance facility in Iran,” U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced on X at the time.

Yesterday, using multiple one-way attack surface drones, CENTCOM forces successfully struck a submarine and ship maintenance facility in Iran. Three Corsair unmanned surface vessels hit the port at Bandar Abbas Naval Base, marking the first time American forces have employed sea… pic.twitter.com/bOM2kmgRxz

— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) July 13, 2026

Regardless, it looks like history was made with this incident in the Black Sea. But this involved a sea drone hunting down and destroying another that couldn’t fight back. Given the rapid pace of weapons development by both sides in the Ukraine war, it seems inevitable that a duel between two armed drones boats could soon follow.

Contact the author: howard@twz.com

The post First-Ever Kill Of A Drone Boat By Another Drone Boat Claimed By Ukraine appeared first on TWZ.

  •  

When King David Almost Lost Everything by Loving his Son More than God

Illustration of King David weeping over the death of his son Absalom who was killed in battle. Image source unknown – appears to be AI generated.

by Brian Shilhavy

Last week I released the Second Edition of my eBook, The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible.

One of the chapters of this book, which can also be read as a single article here, is titled The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible (The title of the book is from this chapter).

In this chapter I show how the “perfect Christian family” does not exist anywhere in the pages of the Bible, as even all the “heroes of the faith” had very difficult and troubled families which today would probably be called “broken families” because they did not meet the standards of today’s Judeo/Christian values for families in Western Culture.

One of those families in the Old Testament that we have quite a bit of text on is the family of King David.

King David fathered many children from many different wives, and one of his children, his son Absalom, completely betrayed him and almost overthrew David from his throne, temporarily taking over the city of Jerusalem.

In the end the people in David’s household who remained loyal to him prevailed, and defeated Absalom in a very bloody battle.

And yet even with this victory, David very nearly lost the entire kingdom, because he idolized Absalom in his heart as his biological son, by loving him more than he loved God.

Death of Absalom by Corrado Giaquinto, 1762. Source.

David’s Failure as a Father and Not Disciplining his Son for Committing Rape had Disastrous Consequences

The story of Absalom’s betrayal against his father and nearly taking over the Kingdom of Israel, starts with one of King David’s other sons who raped the sister of Absalom, and was never punished for it.

The story is recorded in the Bible in 2 Samuel chapter 13.

In the course of time, Amnon son of David fell in love with Tamar, the beautiful sister of Absalom son of David.

Amnon became frustrated to the point of illness on account of his sister Tamar, for she was a virgin, and it seemed impossible for him to do anything to her.

Now Amnon had a friend named Jonadab son of Shimeah, David’s brother. Jonadab was a very shrewd man. He asked Amnon,

“Why do you, the king’s son, look so haggard morning after morning? Won’t you tell me?”

Amnon said to him,

“I’m in love with Tamar, my brother Absalom’s sister.”

“Go to bed and pretend to be ill,” Jonadab said.

“When your father comes to see you, say to him, ‘I would like my sister Tamar to come and give me something to eat. Let her prepare the food in my sight so I may watch her and then eat it from her hand.'”

So Amnon lay down and pretended to be ill.

When the king came to see him, Amnon said to him,

“I would like my sister Tamar to come and make some special bread in my sight, so I may eat from her hand.”

David sent word to Tamar at the palace:

“Go to the house of your brother Amnon and prepare some food for him.”

So Tamar went to the house of her brother Amnon, who was lying down. She took some dough, kneaded it, made the bread in his sight and baked it. Then she took the pan and served him the bread, but he refused to eat.

“Send everyone out of here,” Amnon said.

So everyone left him. Then Amnon said to Tamar,

“Bring the food here into my bedroom so I may eat from your hand.”

And Tamar took the bread she had prepared and brought it to her brother Amnon in his bedroom.

But when she took it to him to eat, he grabbed her and said,

“Come to bed with me, my sister.”

“Don’t, my brother!” she said to him.

“Don’t force me. Such a thing should not be done in Israel! Don’t do this wicked thing. What about me? Where could I get rid of my disgrace?

And what about you? You would be like one of the wicked fools in Israel. Please speak to the king; he will not keep me from being married to you.”

But he refused to listen to her, and since he was stronger than she, he raped her.

Then Amnon hated her with intense hatred. In fact, he hated her more than he had loved her.

Amnon said to her,

“Get up and get out!”

“No!” she said to him.

“Sending me away would be a greater wrong than what you have already done to me.”

But he refused to listen to her. He called his personal servant and said,

“Get this woman out of here and bolt the door after her.”

So his servant put her out and bolted the door after her. She was wearing a richly ornamented robe, for this was the kind of garment the virgin daughters of the king wore.

Tamar put ashes on her head and tore the ornamented robe she was wearing. She put her hand on her head and went away, weeping aloud as she went.

Her brother Absalom said to her,

“Has that Amnon, your brother, been with you? Be quiet now, my sister; he is your brother. Don’t take this thing to heart.”

And Tamar lived in her brother Absalom’s house, a desolate woman.

When King David heard all this, he was furious.

Absalom never said a word to Amnon, either good or bad; he hated Amnon because he had disgraced his sister Tamar. (2 Samuel 13:1-22)

While the text states that King David was “furious” over the rape, no legal action or punishment was apparently ever started as would be required by the Law of Moses for raping a virgin.

David clearly gave preferential treatment to his own biological children that he probably would not have given to non-family members in the Kingdom of Israel.

This allowed the anger and spirit of revenge to foster in Absalom for two years.

Two years later, when Absalom’s sheepshearers were at Baal Hazor near the border of Ephraim, he invited all the king’s sons to come there.

Absalom went to the king and said,

“Your servant has had shearers come. Will the king and his officials please join me?”

“No, my son,” the king replied.

“All of us should not go; we would only be a burden to you.”

Although Absalom urged him, he still refused to go, but gave him his blessing.

Then Absalom said,

“If not, please let my brother Amnon come with us.”

The king asked him, “Why should he go with you?”

But Absalom urged him, so he sent with him Amnon and the rest of the king’s sons.

Absalom ordered his men,

“Listen! When Amnon is in high spirits from drinking wine and I say to you, ‘Strike Amnon down,’ then kill him. Don’t be afraid. Have not I given you this order? Be strong and brave.”

So Absalom’s men did to Amnon what Absalom had ordered.

Then all the king’s sons got up, mounted their mules and fled.

While they were on their way, the report came to David:

“Absalom has struck down all the king’s sons; not one of them is left.”

The king stood up, tore his clothes and lay down on the ground; and all his servants stood by with their clothes torn.

But Jonadab son of Shimeah, David’s brother, said,

“My lord should not think that they killed all the princes; only Amnon is dead. This has been Absalom’s expressed intention ever since the day Amnon raped his sister Tamar. My lord the king should not be concerned about the report that all the king’s sons are dead. Only Amnon is dead.”

(2 Samuel 13:23-33)

Absalom lived as a refugee for three years after this, staying away from his father and Jerusalem.

When he finally came back to Jerusalem, he began his conspiracy to kill his father and take over his throne, by slandering his father and gathering together his enemies.

In the course of time, Absalom provided himself with a chariot and horses and with fifty men to run ahead of him. He would get up early and stand by the side of the road leading to the city gate.

Whenever anyone came with a complaint to be placed before the king for a decision, Absalom would call out to him,

“What town are you from?”

He would answer,

“Your servant is from one of the tribes of Israel.”

Then Absalom would say to him,

“Look, your claims are valid and proper, but there is no representative of the king to hear you.”

And Absalom would add,

“If only I were appointed judge in the land! Then everyone who has a complaint or case could come to me and I would see that he gets justice.”

Also, whenever anyone approached him to bow down before him, Absalom would reach out his hand, take hold of him and kiss him.

Absalom behaved in this way toward all the Israelites who came to the king asking for justice, and so he stole the hearts of the men of Israel.

At the end of four years, Absalom said to the king,

“Let me go to Hebron and fulfill a vow I made to the LORD. While your servant was living at Geshur in Aram, I made this vow: ‘If the LORD takes me back to Jerusalem, I will worship the LORD in Hebron.'”

The king said to him,

“Go in peace.”

So he went to Hebron.

Then Absalom sent secret messengers throughout the tribes of Israel to say,

“As soon as you hear the sound of the trumpets, then say, ‘Absalom is king in Hebron.'”

Two hundred men from Jerusalem had accompanied Absalom. They had been invited as guests and went quite innocently, knowing nothing about the matter.

While Absalom was offering sacrifices, he also sent for Ahithophel the Gilonite, David’s counselor, to come from Giloh, his hometown.

And so the conspiracy gained strength, and Absalom’s following kept on increasing. (2 Samuel 15:1-12)

It is important to note that before all these things happened to King David, God made a Covenant with David, promising him that he would never lack a descendant to sit on his throne and rule Israel. This promise was about the coming Messiah, Jesus Christ, who was a descendant of David.

This is recorded in 2 Samuel chapter 7.

“Now then, tell my servant David, ‘This is what the LORD Almighty says:

I took you from the pasture and from following the flock to be ruler over my people Israel. I have been with you wherever you have gone, and I have cut off all your enemies from before you.

Now I will make your name great, like the names of the greatest men of the earth. And I will provide a place for my people Israel and will plant them so that they can have a home of their own and no longer be disturbed.

Wicked people will not oppress them anymore, as they did at the beginning and have done ever since the time I appointed leaders over my people Israel.

I will also give you rest from all your enemies.

The LORD declares to you that the LORD himself will establish a house for you: When your days are over and you rest with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, who will come from your own body, and I will establish his kingdom.

He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be his father, and he will be my son.

When he does wrong, I will punish him with the rod of men, with floggings inflicted by men. But my love will never be taken away from him, as I took it away from Saul, whom I removed from before you.

Your house and your kingdom will endure forever before me; your throne will be established forever.'” (2 Samuel 7:8-16)

The person from David’s family line that would be next to take the throne was not Absalom. While it is recorded in 2 Samuel 14:27 that Absalom fathered three sons and a daughter, his sons apparently died, according to 2 Samuel 18:

During his lifetime Absalom had taken a pillar and erected it in the King’s Valley as a monument to himself, for he thought, “I have no son to carry on the memory of my name.”

He named the pillar after himself, and it is called Absalom’s Monument to this day. (2 Samuel 18:18)

David’s other son, Solomon, who was born to the woman David originally committed adultery with, Bathsheba, was the one who became the next King after David died. David had also murdered Bathsheba’s first husband, Uriah.

What the Old Testament Scriptures actually teach, therefore, is that God uses imperfect families to accomplish his purpose on earth.

Not only is Bathsheba in the family line of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, so is a non-Israelite, the prostitute of Rahab from Jericho:

A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham: Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram, Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse, and Jesse the father of King David.

David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife… (Matthew 1:1-6)

David and those loyal to him had to flee Jerusalem before they were all murdered by Absalom, and after regrouping their forces, they met with the forces loyal to Absalom in battle, and Absalom himself was killed along with about 20,000 other Israelites.

David mustered the men who were with him and appointed over them commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds. David sent the troops out—a third under the command of Joab, a third under Joab’s brother Abishai son of Zeruiah, and a third under Ittai the Gittite.

The king told the troops,

“I myself will surely march out with you.”

But the men said,

“You must not go out; if we are forced to flee, they won’t care about us. Even if half of us die, they won’t care; but you are worth ten thousand of us. It would be better now for you to give us support from the city.”

The king answered,

“I will do whatever seems best to you.”

So the king stood beside the gate while all the men marched out in units of hundreds and of thousands. The king commanded Joab, Abishai and Ittai,

“Be gentle with the young man Absalom for my sake.”

And all the troops heard the king giving orders concerning Absalom to each of the commanders.

The army marched into the field to fight Israel, and the battle took place in the forest of Ephraim. There the army of Israel was defeated by David’s men, and the casualties that day were great—twenty thousand men.

The battle spread out over the whole countryside, and the forest claimed more lives that day than the sword.

Now Absalom happened to meet David’s men. He was riding his mule, and as the mule went under the thick branches of a large oak, Absalom’s head got caught in the tree.

He was left hanging in midair, while the mule he was riding kept on going. When one of the men saw this, he told Joab,

“I just saw Absalom hanging in an oak tree.”

Joab said to the man who had told him this,

“What! You saw him? Why didn’t you strike him to the ground right there? Then I would have had to give you ten shekels of silver and a warrior’s belt.”

But the man replied,

“Even if a thousand shekels were weighed out into my hands, I would not lift my hand against the king’s son. In our hearing the king commanded you and Abishai and Ittai, ‘Protect the young man Absalom for my sake.’ And if I had put my life in jeopardy—and nothing is hidden from the king—you would have kept your distance from me.”

Joab said,

“I’m not going to wait like this for you.”

So he took three javelins in his hand and plunged them into Absalom’s heart while Absalom was still alive in the oak tree. And ten of Joab’s armor-bearers surrounded Absalom, struck him and killed him.

Then Joab sounded the trumpet, and the troops stopped pursuing Israel, for Joab halted them. They took Absalom, threw him into a big pit in the forest and piled up a large heap of rocks over him.

Meanwhile, all the Israelites fled to their homes. (2 Samuel 18:1-17)

Image source unknown. Appears to be AI generated.

Joab, the head of David’s military, and the only one who was powerful enough to defy the king’s orders, did what he had to do to protect the Kingdom.

He knew full well what David’s response would be, but he also knew full well what the consequences would be if Absalom was allowed to live, so he acted in the best interests of the Kingdom.

What happened next was an event that if David had made the wrong choice, he would have lost everything.

Joab was told,

“The king is weeping and mourning for Absalom.”

And for the whole army the victory that day was turned into mourning, because on that day the troops heard it said,

“The king is grieving for his son.”

The men stole into the city that day as men steal in who are ashamed when they flee from battle. The king covered his face and cried aloud,

“O my son Absalom! O Absalom, my son, my son!”

Then Joab went into the house to the king and said,

“Today you have humiliated all your men, who have just saved your life and the lives of your sons and daughters and the lives of your wives and concubines.

You love those who hate you and hate those who love you. You have made it clear today that the commanders and their men mean nothing to you.

I see that you would be pleased if Absalom were alive today and all of us were dead.

Now go out and encourage your men.

I swear by the LORD that if you don’t go out, not a man will be left with you by nightfall.

This will be worse for you than all the calamities that have come upon you from your youth till now.”

So the king got up and took his seat in the gateway.

When the men were told, “The king is sitting in the gateway,” they all came before him. Meanwhile, the Israelites had fled to their homes. (2 Samuel 19:1-8)

David came within hours of losing everything, simply because he loved his biological son more than he loved God, and the Kingdom of God of which he was appointed King.

If you put your Loyalty to Jesus and the Father Above your Loyalty to Family, the World will Hate You

Loyalty to family members and bloodlines above all else is Satanic and worldly. Jesus made this very clear during his time on earth, stating to the Jews that their bloodlines back to Abraham were meaningless, unless they actually knew God, and recognized that he came from God and was the Messiah.

Jesus also clearly demanded loyalty to him above our loyalty to family members, and he himself was persecuted by his own family members as I have recently written. See:

When Jesus’s Own Family Turned Against Him

As a result of Jesus’s loyalty to his Heavenly Father above his earthly family, the world hated him. And he stated that the world would hate us also if we walked this same path.

If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.

If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own.

As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.

Remember the words I spoke to you: ‘No servant is greater than his master.’

If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. (John 15:18-20)

This principle applies not only to our own biological families, but also to the fake believers in the “Household of God”, or those who claim to be part of “God’s family.”

Being part of a group of believers does not give anyone a “free pass” if they do not know God, and are betraying the faith.

Paul made this very clear in his writings:

It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife.

And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this?

Even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. And I have already passed judgment on the one who did this, just as if I were present.

When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 5:1-5)

Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience.

Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme. (1 Timothy 1:18-20)

It is often a very lonely journey as we walk through this life as aliens and pilgrims, knowing that this is not our home, as we reject the ways of the world and then suffer for it, often by being rejected by our own families or so called “believers” and “brothers”.

But it is worth it, knowing where our loyalties lie, just like the true believers who walked that same lonely path before us!

All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance.

And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth.

People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one.

Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them.

I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets, who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies.

Women received back their dead, raised to life again. Others were tortured and refused to be released, so that they might gain a better resurrection. Some faced jeers and flogging, while still others were chained and put in prison.

They were stoned; they were sawed in two; they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated:

The world was not worthy of them.

(Hebrews 11)

Comment on this article at Created4Health.org.

This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

Second Edition of eBook Released: The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible – by Brian Shilhavy

FREE eBook! Restoring the Foundation of New Testament Faith in Jesus Christ – by Brian Shilhavy

The Brotherhood of Satan vs. The Brotherhood of Jesus Christ

KABBALAH: The Anti-Christ Religion of Satan that Controls the World Today

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

The Bewitching of America with the Evil Eye and the Mark of the Beast

Jesus Christ’s Opposition to the Jewish State: Lessons for Today

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

What is the Condition of Your Heart? The Superiority of the Human Heart over the Human Brain

The Seal and Mark of God is Far More Important than the “Mark of the Beast” – Are You Prepared for What’s Coming?

The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Image of the Beast?

Medicine: Idolatry in the Twenty First Century – 10-Year-Old Article More Relevant Today than the Day it was Written

Having problems receiving our emails? See:

How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

We Are Now on Telegram. Video channels at Bitchute, and Odysee.

If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.

If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.

The post When King David Almost Lost Everything by Loving his Son More than God first appeared on Health Impact News.

  •  
❌