Las fechas que se han propuesto para la llegada de los primeros humanos a América se reparten en una horquilla de más de 100.000 años. En un extremo está Cerutti, un yacimiento de California que Holen y sus colegas fecharon en unos 130.000 años en un estudio publicado en Nature en 2017. En el otro, […]
Equipamento mais destacado das forças aéreas americanas e israelitas, o caça F-35 desenvolvido nos Estados Unidos foi adotado por uns vinte países, nomeadamente na Europa, apesar (ou por causa?) da dependência que impõe aos seus utilizadores… À frente dos seus concorrentes, este caça furtivo distingue-se também por um preço proibitivo e por custos de exploração astronómicos. Em 18 de março de 2019, a ministra das Forças Armadas francesas, Florence Parly, criticava um grupo de (…)
It was common practice during the Cold War to exaggerate the threat from the Soviet Union. Nowadays, Russia has assumed that role. Although the circumstances have changed, some of the political methods employed to create a sense of insecurity are still remarkably similar.
Europe is not formally engaging in preparations for war since it desires one. Instead, the governments of Europe and the institutions of the EU describe their rapidly growing defence policies and war preparedness as being aimed at deterrence, on the basis that Europe has to become strong enough to avoid a bigger conflict.
NATO does likewise, presenting itself as a defensive alliance whose role is to deter aggression. Nevertheless, the extent and the terminology used in Europe’s present military transformation should be examined. If preparedness becomes a top political concern, if huge amounts of public money are channelled into defence industries, and if support for Ukraine becomes more and more tied to Europe’s own security, then a significant question arises: where does deterrence cease and the political preparation for war begin?
The question is especially relevant to the EU, which has throughout its history been based on reconciliation, economic interdependence and a rejection of war.
From a peace project to a defence project
The European Union is experiencing a deep change in the way it views security. This change is no illusion. As part of the ReArm Europe/Readiness 2030 programme the European Commission plans to commit up to 800 billion euros towards defence spending, and the EU has set up a 150 billion euro SAFE lending facility to assist with military investment and joint procurement. The various EU institutions have made it clear that the aim is to eliminate capability gaps, boost the European defence industry and enhance deterrence.
The language that goes with this transformation is just as important. European Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius has warned at the European Parliament that Russia could be ready for a confrontation with NATO “in five years or less”. He has also invoked Jean Monnet’s wartime “Victory Programme” analogy, arguing that Europe needs a comparable transformation of its defence industry.
The official view of the Commission is that the issue is one of deterrence and not about starting a war. However, a military system which is intended to deter war needs to have weapons, logistical support, industrial capacity, troops and operational plans. As these capabilities increase, so too does the institutional ability to conduct war.
A paradox arises since Europe claims it is arming itself and preparing its hospitals to receive 2,000 wounds per day – as it is the case in Germany — in order to maintain peace while at the same time setting up a more and more integrated belligerent European defence structure. The EU is considering not just an increase in weapons but also the creation of a European Defence Union, a European Security Council, common procurement, military mobility and a closer relationship between European institutions and NATO.
The fact that this might constitute a necessary adaptation to a new security situation also brings up a more general issue concerning European identity: is the European Union still mainly a peace project which happens to have military capabilities, or is it instead becoming a geopolitical and military actor for which readiness for confrontation is becoming increasingly important?
Is Russia a threat, an adversary, or a permanent enemy?
Here, there is a mixture of perceived threats, old ressentiments and Russophobia in play. The threat perceptions are not the same throughout Europe. Because of historical reasons, such as foreign occupation and Soviet domination, Poland has long viewed Russia differently from countries such as France and Germany, which after the Cold War initially placed greater emphasis on economic engagement and interdependence with Moscow. But that distinction has changed dramatically.
Germany, in particular, has moved from the Ostpolitik-era logic of engagement towards a confrontational security posture. Under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Berlin has described Russia as a serious threat, committed to a major expansion of defence spending, and taken a leading role in sustaining military support for Ukraine. Germany has also intensified defence cooperation with France, including discussions on nuclear deterrence and European capabilities. Germany has also established a permanent military presence in the Baltic States, with a brigade of around 5,000 soldiers being stationed in Lithuania.
The military buildup that Poland has since carried out has depended largely on the United States and South Korea, highlighting a further weakness: even though the EU has aimed at setting up a European defence industry, European manufacturers have not always been able to provide weapons at the speed and on the scale required by countries that have been rearming since 2022.
A more serious issue is that those who question the military escalation are seen as showing a lack of strength, a state of naivety or a failure to have sufficient solidarity with Europe — what then becomes of democratic debate? French Socialist Ségolène Royal.
The danger of making war readiness a political culture
That is exactly the reason why Europe’s present-day transformation should be subject to democratic scrutiny.
Deterrence becomes a politically dangerous thing when preparedness itself comes to be the main idea of security, when military expenditure starts to compete with other public priorities, and when diplomacy and negotiation are regarded as being of less importance than the building up of military power.
The proper European question therefore isn’t whether Europe is “strong enough” to fight Russia. It is rather what kind of security arrangement the Europeans would like to establish.
The present danger is that, as a result of years of confrontation, rearmament and politics based on the use of threats, Europe might slowly create a political and institutional setting in which war seems ever more certain and peace ever more unrealistic.
Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson says that a wider conflict between Europe and Russia is becoming “inevitable” since, in his opinion, the rhetoric of Europe is increasingly being matched by actions which Russia could see as direct threats. He highlights Germany as especially important, stating that Berlin’s more confrontational rhetoric, its military preparations and its demands on Moscow are leading to a dangerous escalation.
Johnson also sees the capture of Russian ships as a key point of escalation. He maintains that Moscow might view any attempt by Europe to seize its ships as an act of war and could then retaliate against the ships or military assets in question. He also mentions the collapse of diplomatic relations, the rearmament of European forces, preparations for a possible future confrontation, and the increasing pressure surrounding Kaliningrad as factors which reduce the room for de-escalation. In his view, the real danger is not that Russia is seeking war but that European actions are gradually making a direct confrontation inevitable.
Ricardo Martins – Doctor of Sociology, specialist in European and international politics as well as geopolitics
Tourism’s contribution to Russia’s gross domestic product exceeded 3 percent in 2025, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Chernyshenko stated, as reported by TASS in late September. According to him, tourism is among the fastest-growing sectors of the Russian economy. Chernyshenko attributed these results to measures under the “Tourism and Hospitality” national project, which he said […]
Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., an epidemiologist and sports physician, said her decision to follow the data during the COVID-19 pandemic came at a steep professional price.
Høeg said her experience exposed the unwillingness of universities, media and public health institutions to adapt when research conflicted with their accepted narratives.
In an interview this week with investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker on The DisInformation Chronicle, Høeg said institutions too often treated the accepted narrative as settled and then dismissed or attacked people who questioned it.
That approach did more than distort the public discussion about COVID-19, Høeg said. It also created a scientific and institutional culture that could affect how other medical questions are handled long after the pandemic.
For Høeg, the solution is simple: Scientists should follow the evidence wherever it leads.
“It’s a core belief of mine that you have to be objective when you’re doing scientific studies,” she said. “Otherwise, you just shouldn’t do them. It’s pointless if you’re not willing to be objective.”
‘I … didn’t realize the jeopardy that I was putting myself in’
During the pandemic, Høeg published 30 to 40 papers on COVID-19 transmission, masking, youth sports, vaccine risk-benefit, pregnancy, long COVID, visitor restrictions and testing.
Some of her research challenged widely accepted claims.
One study found little evidence of COVID-19 transmission among children in Wisconsin schools, which was consistent with data from Europe. Another examined myocarditis risk in boys after their second Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine dose and found the risks outweighed the benefits in boys who didn’t have underlying health conditions.
Høeg said she didn’t initially understand the professional risks she was taking by challenging the prevailing narrative.
“There was sort of a hesitancy to do this sort of research because I think people were afraid for their careers,” she said. “I actually was blessed with having recently moved from Denmark and didn’t realize the jeopardy that I was putting myself in by doing these sorts of studies.”
At the time, Høeg was conducting research at the University of California, Davis.
She said the university received calls, including from Naturemagazine, complaining about her studies on pandemic policies. Eventually, the university asked her not to use her affiliation with the school.
Høeg said the university refused to renew her voluntary position in 2022, after the European Journal of Clinical Investigation published her study on myocarditis risks in boys who received the COVID-19 vaccine.
NPR also dropped an interview with Høeg for “All Things Considered” after she raised concerns about masking children during outdoor sports.
In a pre-interview discussion with NPR, she told the outlet, “We don’t have evidence that these masks work to prevent transmission. … Bottom line is, we shouldn’t be doing these unproven things to children that are harmful.”
Soon after, NPR told Høeg she was no longer needed for the interview.
“It does say a lot about our universities and institutions because it’s like they had been brainwashed to an extent to believe what the media was saying rather than actually look at the data,” Høeg said.
‘They repeated the same wording … even when the data didn’t back it up’
In 2022, Høeg and her colleagues conducted a follow-up analysis of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study on school mask mandates.
Høeg said their analysis used a larger dataset and a longer time period and reached the opposite conclusion about the relationship between mask mandates and COVID-19 transmission among children.
The team’s submission to the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) was rejected. Høeg said reviewers described the submission as “rife with polemics.”
“Well, maybe it’s polarizing if you disagree with it,” Høeg said.
The rejection unearthed an underlying problem at the CDC, according to Høeg.
“They have a scientific agenda,” she said. “And so as soon as you have a scientific agenda, science has been thrown out the window. Science doesn’t have an agenda other than to find the truth.”
A 2024 analysis by Høeg and colleagues examined 77 mask studies published in the MMWR beginning in 2020. According to Høeg, 75% of the studies said masks were effective, while only 14% reported statistically significant results and none were randomized studies.
One finding especially stood out to her: She said 5% of the studies found masks were connected to higher infection rates, yet “they still concluded that masks worked.”
“They repeated the same wording over and over again in each of the studies, that ‘masks are necessary to decrease the spread’ and ‘masks are critical in controlling the case rates of COVID-19,’” she said. “They use the same sort of wording even when the data didn’t back it up at all.”
‘Why are we demonizing people for looking into this?’
A leaked memo from then-FDA official Dr. Vinay Prasad said career staff had linked at least 10 child deaths to the COVID-19 vaccine between 2021 and 2024.
Høeg said she reviewed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports and found that investigations involving medical records and autopsies had already been conducted.
“My question at the time was … why are these not being made public?” Høeg told Thacker.
Høeg said news leaked that she would present information about the deaths and their possible association with COVID-19 vaccines. She said the media response focused on portraying her as an “anti-vaxxer” rather than asking why the deaths had been investigated but not publicly disclosed.
“If we have these sorts of deaths happening in children due to medical products of any kind, why are we sitting on them for years?” she asked. “That’s the take-home I want people to have from this.”
She also questioned why people who investigate potential safety problems are attacked for trying to expose the dangers.
“Why are we demonizing people for looking into this? … Isn’t that what the public wants?” she asked.
‘The deep state really is a thing’
In May, just days after FDA Commissioner Marty Makary resigned, Høeg said she arrived at work to find media reports claiming she had resigned — something she said she knew nothing about.
FDA lawyers later asked her to resign, but she refused to sign the letter. She was subsequently locked out of the agency’s systems and escorted from the building.
Høeg said she never received a performance-based explanation for her termination. She also said the person identified as the author of her termination memo later denied writing or seeing it.
According to Høeg, agency lawyers told her the order came from “way above their pay grade.”
The experience changed how she viewed other departures from the agency. “It opened my eyes to the fact that maybe a number of the people who I thought had resigned really had not resigned,” she said.
“The deep state really is a thing,” she added.
‘Women who want to get pregnant … should be told about these risks’
For Høeg, the concerns she encountered during the COVID-19 era are not limited to COVID-19.
In 2025, she helped organize an FDA panel examining potential risks associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, during pregnancy.
The American Psychiatric Association criticized the panel for what it called “misinterpretation and unbalanced viewpoints.” Høeg said the media also portrayed any discussion of potential risks as “misinformation about SSRI use” and a signal that depression wasn’t being taken seriously.
According to Høeg, the panel discussed risks already addressed in FDA labeling and scientific research, including miscarriage, premature birth, postpartum hemorrhage, congenital heart defects and neonatal adaptation syndrome.
“This should not be controversial that women who want to get pregnant and who are pregnant should be told about these risks,” she said.
She also warned about the lack of ongoing monitoring of drug safety.
“The FDA is not actively investigating the safety of these products in pregnancy or at all after the initial trials are done,” she said.
Høeg said the discussion should not be interpreted as an argument against treating depression. “I don’t think that any of this should be synonymous with not taking depression seriously,” she said. “That’s just nonsense.”
‘There’s just no reporting on this. … People have died taking this drug’
Høeg also discussed Tavneos, the Amgen-manufactured brand name for avacopan, a drug approved to treat a type of blood-vessel inflammation.
While at CDER, Høeg said she raised concerns that the pivotal clinical trial used to approve the drug had included manipulated data.
According to Høeg, at least eight deaths had been attributed to the drug because of liver injury.
“There’s just no reporting on this,” Høeg said. “People have died taking this drug. … We asked for them to withdraw it from the market, and the media is just totally silent.”
Thacker: ‘There was no real learning in the end. … If anything, we became dumber’
Høeg said it is troubling that some of the most disputed COVID-19 policies are still treated as settled questions.
“How is this still part of our collective conversation that people … are still saying school closures were necessary and mask mandates were necessary?” she asked.
Thacker said the failure to learn from those policies could have consequences during the next pandemic. People who developed a “false sense of safety from masks” during COVID-19 could mistakenly assume masks will protect them from a more dangerous virus in the future, he said.
Thacker also questioned whether the country understands anything about the COVID-19 vaccines. “There was no real learning in the end. … If anything, we became dumber,” he said.
Høeg said the problem stems from the widespread failure to reconsider policies when the evidence changed.
“Once the government decided this is what we have to do, they just kept digging in, even though the data didn’t support it,” she said.
“This is why I keep doing these interviews, because it’s important for people to know the truth.”
Watch Høeg on ‘The DisInformation Chronicle’ podcast here:
Armed with rockets and storming target buildings, Chinese "robot dogs" have made their debut in Serbian military drills, signaling the expansion of defense and industrial ties between Belgrade and Beijing right on Europe’s doorstep.
A bipartisan, bicameral group of US lawmakers is pressing for tougher action on what they describe as democratic backsliding, corruption, and growing Russian, Chinese, and Iranian influence in Serbia, just weeks before snap parliamentary elections.
People in Russian-held Oleshky in Ukraine's Kherson region have endured war, occupation, and devastating flooding. Now, trapped by land mines and cut off from basic supplies, they face "hell," starving in a virtual ghost town, Ukrainian officials and volunteers say.
Anyone over the age of about 35 has no idea how far Western universities have fallen into the mire of DEI, collapsing standards and Left-wing monoculture, says Professor James Allan. It's time to sort them out.
Ficou em prisão preventiva um homem, de 33 anos, que tinha sido detido pela GNR, no dia 28 de setembro, suspeito de roubo com recurso a arma branca, no concelho de Albufeira.
Ex CIA officer testified in a Tribunal on “Exploitation of children by satanic elites as Clinton one”
Former CIA officer and founder of the Marine Corps Intelligence Command, Robert David Steele (died in 2021) , testified before the International Tribunal for Natural Justice on the systemic exploitation of children by powerful satanic elites.
He exposed that children are not only kidnapped but in some cases bred by families in the United States as a cash crop, sold without birth certificates, making it easier to kill them with no trace. He stated children are imported by the plane load, also without documentation.
Steele described this as extending beyond slavery and sex abuse to child torture for adrenalized blood in satanic blood-drinking ceremonies, harvesting of body organs, and ritual murder!
«After Robert helped us all expose The Clinton Foundation and CIA child trafficking networks, he mysteriously “died of Covid-19” in 2021» Russian outlet News-Pravda added in its post.
“The reason we have 1,000 military bases is not for military power. They’re lily pads for smuggling. That’s how CIA smuggles gold, guns, drugs, cash, and small children for the elites in the United States!”
‘Donald Trump could use a nuclear weapon against Iran as a GRAND FINALE to declare victory and go home.’
Matthew Hoh, former Department of Defense & State Department Official who resigned over the Afghanistan war.
‘The danger of the use of a nuclear weapon in this war has always been here. I’ve been afraid that the United States would use a nuclear weapon possibly back in April, against say maybe one of the facilities like Isfahan”.
“The idea presented to President Trump: ‘Mr. President, these are low-yield nuclear weapons. They are a fraction of the size of the Hiroshima bomb. There’s hardly any fallout. You can barely even call these a nuclear weapon”.
“And what we can do is we can drop it on Isfahan. That will seal off that facility, and the Iranians will never be able to get to that enriched uranium. And this way, you can declare victory and go home.’
“You could see that same argument can still apply this time, maybe with Pickaxe Mountain or something like that.The idea that it provides for a grand finale for the president of the United States to declare victory and go home”
WATCH FULL INTERVIEW BELOW
CNN – FIRST-EVER radio signal from a planet outside our solar system DETECTED
FIRST-EVER radio signal from a planet outside our solar system DETECTED ‘The signal is evidence of a colossal magnetic field, not intelligent life’— CNN
The planet is 63 LIGHT-YEARS away & the signal is 200 times stronger than Jupiter’s — but scientists don’t know WHY it’s so powerful?
A well-informed source familiar with the matter has revealed new details about the incident related to an Emirati aircraft, saying Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to win the upcoming election is to drag US President Donald Trump into a new quagmire against Iran.
Iranian Press TV and Anadolu Turkish Agency so confirmed the suggestion highlighted by Gospa News on previous updates below in September, 30.
Speaking to Press TV, the regional source said the “absurd scenario” involving the hijacking of an Emirati aircraft bound for the occupied territories from the UAE, followed by its landing in Saudi Arabia, was carried out on Wednesday, three days after Netanyahu travelled to the United Arab Emirates accompanied by several senior military and intelligence officials.
The project, the informed source said, was discussed and finalized during the visit.
Baghdad erupted in celebration as the US-led international coalition formally ended its military mission in Iraq after 12 years.
Crowds gathered in the Iraqi capital, with participants calling the withdrawal a “great victory” and a step toward Iraqi sovereignty. The coalition’s exit follows a phased agreement between Baghdad and Washington reached in 2024.
A GNR deteve em flagrante delito, no dia 1 de outubro, dois homens, de 19 e 26 anos, suspeitos de burla através do levantamento indevido de encomendas dos CTT, no concelho de Silves.
Historian Margaret MacMillan warns that increasingly interconnected wars are increasing the risk of a wider conflict, as she discusses Ukraine’s future, Putin’s Russia, NATO’s vulnerabilities, and an emerging “new world disorder.”
Metro stations closed, roads barricaded, and more than 700 detained as students and opposition parties protest against the Election Commission. A visual guide to the agitation.
Investigamos o que importa para os brasileiros além do que passa na campanha eleitoral. Leia mais reportagens como essa clicando aqui.
Nas duas últimas legislaturas no Congresso Brasileiro, 370 deputados e senadores foram responsáveis por propostas de lei que enfraquecem os direitos indígenas — e 270 deles disputam reeleição neste ano. Ao todo, esses políticos atuaram em 252 projetos, a maioria incidindo negativamente sobre o direito à terra para esses povos.
As informações são baseadas em um levantamento da Agência Pública a partir da nova plataforma lançada pelo Conselho Indigenista Missionário (Cimi), o Congresso Anti-Indígena.
Entre os projetos de lei que afetam os indígenas, estão propostas que buscavam anular decretos de demarcação de territórios e outros que alteram a Constituição Federal, para que as decisões sobre a demarcação sejam feitas pelo Congresso Nacional — justamente onde estão os políticos que atuam contra a demarcação de mais terras.
Para Cleber Buzatto, missionário do Cimi Regional Sul, essa atuação mostra que o principal interesse é impedir as demarcações e também explorar as terras.
“Isso demonstra uma articulação dos setores anti-indígenas, seja do ponto de vista político, mas, também, dos grupos econômicos que têm interesses sobre as terras, portanto, se organizam e atuam de forma bastante enfática e violenta contra os direitos indígenas no Congresso Nacional por meio de um conjunto amplo de partidos e parlamentares”, explica Buzzatto.
Entre 513 deputados e deputadas federais eleitos em 2022, apenas cinco se autodeclaram indígenas, menos de 1% do total. Como a Públicamostrou, neste ano, o movimento indígena lançou 47 pré-candidaturas para tentar mudar esse quadro. “É importante que os próprios povos [indígenas] consigam acessar espaços nessas casas legislativas, especialmente no âmbito da Câmara dos Deputados, que é onde tem mais candidatos indígenas disputando as vagas, até para que essa diretriz seja coerente com a defesa de fato dos direitos e dos interesses dos projetos de vida e futuro dos povos indígenas”, afirma.
Atualmente, segundo dados do Cimi, 291 propostas legislativas que impactam os direitos indígenas tramitam no Congresso Nacional. Entre elas, 204 têm efeitos negativos, segundo o levantamento.
PL, de Bolsonaro, é o principal partido a votar em propostas anti-indígenas, aponta levantamento
A partir da análise de mais de 41 mil votos, a plataforma identificou, dentre os partidos políticos, 19 que votaram sempre ou quase sempre em projetos que vão contra os povos indígenas. Apenas oito partidos votaram favoravelmente.
O Partido Liberal (PL), do candidato à presidência Flávio Bolsonaro, fica em primeiro lugar tanto entre os partidos cujos políticos mais propuseram propostas anti-indígenas, quanto entre os parlamentares que mais votam em projetos contrários aos direitos desses povos. São 95 proposições e 6.630 votos desfavoráveis segundo a classificação do Cimi. Em seguida, está o MDB, com 47 proposições, e o Partido Progressista (PP), com 42. Já entre os partidos cujos políticos tiveram mais votos em projetos contrários aos direitos indígenas, após o PL, está o PP, com 3.232 votos, e, em terceiro lugar, o União, com 3.063.
Por outro lado, o Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT), do presidente e candidato Lula, é o que mais teve propostas e votos em projetos classificados como favoráveis aos indígenas, com 4.971 a favor e 71 proposições. Em seguida, está o PSB, com 1.127 votos a favor, e o PDT, com 1.114 votos. O PCdoB, mesmo com apenas 11 deputados na Câmara, tem 100% dos votos direcionados a pautas consideradas favoráveis aos indígenas. Após o PT, entre os partidos que mais propuseram propostas favoráveis, estão o Psol, com 31 propostas.
Políticos que fizeram mais propostas com efeitos negativos aos direitos indígenas, segundo o levantamento
Deputado federal Marcos Pollon (PL-MS)
Candidato à reeleição para deputado federal pelo Mato Grosso do Sul, o deputado tem um total de 26 propostas classificadas como contrárias aos direitos indígenas, sendo 24 delas sobre o direito territorial dos povos tradicionais. O deputado é o terceiro-secretário da Frente Parlamentar Invasão Zero, grupo criado em 2023 que defende o direito à propriedade contra o Marco Temporal.
Entre as principais propostas do deputado está o PL 2145/2023, que altera o “Estatuto do Índio” para impedir o reconhecimento de determinadas áreas como de ocupação tradicional. Já o PDL 521/2025 impede a atuação da Força Nacional em apoio à Funai na Terra Indígena Rio dos Índios (RS) e o PL 4039/2024 obriga a União a indenizar não indígenas em áreas que ocorreu esbulho por indígenas e que não eram demarcadas.
A reportagem procurou a assessoria do deputado, que afirmou, em nota, não reconhecer o Cimi como “autoridade para julgar meu mandato” e que seu trabalho para os povos originários é para que eles “tenham reconhecido o direito de propriedade das terras que ocupam e possam produzir e prosperar nessas áreas, sem violência no campo.”. O deputado também cita que atuou como consultor jurídico em 2015 durante a Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito (CPI) do Cimi, criada para investigar as ações do órgão no estado. A CPI foi anulada pelo Tribunal Regional Federal da 3ª Região (TRF3), que a Assembleia Legislativa de Mato Grosso do Sul não tinha competência para realizar a CPI.
Senador Luis Carlos Heinze (PP-RS)
Com 15 propostas classificadas como anti-indígenas, todas elas com relação ao direito territorial, o senador Luis Carlos Heinze, que teve passagem na Câmara dos Deputados e no Senado, ocupa o segundo lugar entre os políticos que mais propuseram leis contra os indígenas.
Entre as propostas de autoria do senador, estão três Propostas de Emenda à Constituição (PEC) que transferem do Poder Executivo para o Congresso Nacional a atribuição de demarcar terras indígenas, as PECs 61/2023, 319/2004 e 59/2023.
Questionado sobre sua posição diante a classificação que suas propostas são contrárias aos povos indígenas, Heinze em nota à Pública afirma que “suas propostas não são contrárias aos povos indígenas”. Segundo o senador, sua atuação “é pautada pelo respeito e defesa do direito de propriedade e da segurança jurídica no campo, garantindo a proteção aos produtores que possuem o título legítimo de suas terras” e também defendeu a inclusão dos povos originários “deve passar pela autonomia e pelo desenvolvimento econômico”.
Senador Zequinha Marinho (Pode-PA)
Concorrendo à reeleição no Senado, Zequinha Marinho é autor de 13 proposições legislativas que interferem no direito territorial dos povos indígenas.
Além de criar a PEC 10/2024, que modifica o artigo 231 da Constituição Federal para “permitir aos índios [sic] produzir e comercializar livremente sua produção”, que abre brechas jurídicas para a entrada do agronegócio em territórios reservados, o senador é também assina a PEC 59/2023, que retira o poder do Ministério da Justiça e da Presidência da República para decidir sobre demarcações, colocando o tema sob crivo dos parlamentares.
A reportagem procurou a assessoria do senador, que não respondeu.
Deputada Coronel Fernanda (PL-MT)
Com 13 proposições classificadas como contrárias aos indígenas, e concorrendo para a reeleição na câmara dos deputados, a deputada Coronel Fernanda apresentou propostas que também podem gerar danos ao meio ambiente.
O PDL 466/2023, de sua autoria, suspende o decreto nº 11.367/2023, que recriou o Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal (PPCDAm), enfraquecendo ferramentas de proteção ambiental e de enfrentamento à grilagem.
Também é de sua autoria o PDL 380/2024, que suspende resolução do Conselho Nacional de Política Indigenista que recomenda ao Governo Federal a inclusão do tema da demarcação das terras indígenas como eixo do Plano Clima.
Procurada, a assessoria da deputada não respondeu.
In February 2026, weeks after Cambodia’s National Assembly approved a draft law to ratify the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a convention Phnom Penh signed in 1983 but never ratified, Japan unveiled plans to extend Official Security Assistance (OSA) to Cambodia. The announcement did not come out of nowhere and […]
Washington’s invitation to President Putin to the Miami G20 offers Russia an opportunity to pursue direct diplomacy with Washington over the Ukraine conflict while reaffirming its role in the emerging global economic order despite continued Western efforts to isolate Moscow. An Invitation with Strategic Meaning The upcoming G20 summit is scheduled for December 14-15, 2026, […]