❌

Normal view

Ricordo di Andrea Angeli

6 October 2026 at 21:46
Caro Andrea, te ne sei andato in sordina, una mattina… senza disturbare, come eri solito fare, quando partivi all’improvviso, senza preavviso, per terre lontane, dall’Iraq al Kosovo alle montagne afghane, senza paura, senza a cautela, per approdare poi nella Grande Mela, dai tuoi tanti amici, tu che non avevi nemici! Hai finito il tuo ultimo […]

Paris bans pro-Palestinian demonstration planned for Oct. 7 over ‘risks of public disorder’

By: aletho
6 October 2026 at 21:34
MEMO | October 6, 2026

Paris police chief Patrice Faure on Tuesday banned a pro-Palestinian demonstration planned for Wednesday, the third anniversary of Oct. 7, 2023 attacks in Israel, over “risks of public disorder,” Anadolu reports.

“At the request of Interior Minister Laurent Nunez, I issued an order banning a demonstration ‘against the genocide in Gaza and for respect for the ceasefire’ in Paris on Wednesday,” Faure said on US social media platform X.

He noted that such a demonstration could pose “significant risks of public disorder,” citing a “high terrorist threat” and antisemitic acts that “remain at historically high levels” across France.

“In light of this, and in view of all the risks identified, it is my responsibility to ensure everyone’s safety. I have therefore decided to ban this demonstration,” Faure added.

Israel’s genocidal war launched three years ago in Gaza has killed more than 74,000 people, injured many more and destroyed most of the enclave’s infrastructure.

Ukraine’s war leadership sets new electronic warfare tasks as Russia’s jet-powered drones slip past nearly half of its air defenses

6 October 2026 at 21:19

Geran-4" is an evolution of the earlier "Geran-3" model

Russia keeps upgrading its jet-powered drones, and Ukraine's electronic warfare is racing to keep up. Kyiv has set extra tasks for its military and manufacturers to scale up the most effective electronic warfare approaches, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said after a meeting of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief's Staff on electronic warfare and infrastructure protection.

Russia keeps modifying its jet-powered Shaheds to beat each new Ukrainian defense, and Ukraine's answers have to keep pace. The race is tight: from 1 to 26 September, air defenses downed only 55 percent of the 2,730 new jet-powered drones, against 90% of the slower ones.

Hidden relays blunt Kyiv's jammers

Jamming has to improve because Russia keeps finding new ways around it. On 3 October, presidential adviser Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov said someone had installed Russian MESH radio repeaters in Kyiv, a short control channel that guides Shahed drones onto their targets. As long as they are there, he said, closing the city with electronic warfare will not be effective.

"As long as online control of drones exists, not only the bridges but the air defense assets will be under threat," Flash stressed.

Sanctions aim at the supply chain

Beyond the jamming task, the Staff turned to where Russia gets the parts for those drones. Defense Intelligence reported on Russia's technological priorities for this year and next, and on supplies of critical components and equipment for its weapons production, Zelenskyy said.

New sanctions packages will follow, with Defense Intelligence due to send proposals to the Ukrainian government and the National Security and Defense Council, and Ukraine is working to align its sanctions with partners' jurisdictions.

The Staff also set the main tasks for supplying Ukrainian forces with long-range drones next year.

"The main criterion is that we must be able to respond in kind to Russian strikes," Zelenskyy emphasized.

Those parts, and the drones built from them, keep changing

In August, Intelligence Deputy Chief Vadym Skibitskyi said Russia remained fully dependent on Chinese turbojets for the Geran-4 and Geran-5, each costing about $35,000 to $40,000.

However, two months later, Ukraine reported the Geran-4 had received a locally built engine and a new optical navigation system. Kyiv has to stay attuned to changes to keep pace with the technology race, and so far, it is still trying to catch up rather than get ahead.

Trump Announces that “Artificial Intelligence” (AI) is Now Renamed “Super Intelligence” (SI) – What Comes Next?

6 October 2026 at 21:09

President Donald Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Vice President JD Vance, Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission Andrew Ferguson, and former National Security Advisor in the Bush administration Condoleezza Rice are among those appointed to the new “SI” Task Force.

by Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact New

President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order formally instructing his administration to stop using the terms “artificial intelligence” and “AI” in favor of “super intelligence” and “SI.”

President Trump Announces ‘Super Intelligence’ Accord, Renames AI

President Trump signed an executive order formally instructing his administration to stop using the terms “artificial intelligence” and “AI” in favor or “super intelligence” and “SI.” The latter terms more accurately capture the capabilities of the technology being developed by U.S. labs, according to the order.

“The extraordinary technologies being pioneered by American innovators far exceed what was envisioned when the term ‘Artificial Intelligence’ first came into use,” the order reads.

The “White House Accord on Super Intelligence,” which Trump posted on Truth Social, was signed by executives at Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI and Nvidia.

The accord came after the White House hosted a lunch with tech leaders from those companies, along with Jeff Bezos, Satya Nadella, David Sacks and others. At a press conference after the lunch, Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that the accord represented “good steps forward,” adding “this is a start and an accord that the whole industry could come to.”

Source.

Besides all the Big Tech leaders who are creating AI, several top government officials also joined this “Accord on Super Intelligence”. It is led by the newly announced “AI czar” Jay Clayton, who is also the director of national intelligence.

Other members include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Vice President JD Vance, Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission Andrew Ferguson, and former National Security Advisor in the Bush administration Condoleezza Rice. (Source.)

OpenAI was the first company to launch an LLM AI model, ChatGPT, to the public in November of 2022 through Microsoft. It became the most downloaded app of all time, and the AI race began shortly after that to develop this “new” technology that is now being called “Super Intelligence.”

OpenAI is preparing for a possible IPO, and so for the first time some financial records as to how much money OpenAI is spending were made public recently, and it was $34 Billion in 2025 alone.

OpenAI spent $34 billion in 2025 as losses mount ahead of planned IPO

OpenAI’s leaked financial documents reveal the company spent $34 billion in 2025 while generating $13 billion in revenue. Research and development costs alone reached $19 billion, with $10.6 billion going to Microsoft.

Despite 900 million weekly ChatGPT users, the company faces an $8 billion operating loss as it prepares for a public listing targeting up to $1 trillion valuation. (Source.)

So while we don’t know the total amount of money spent by OpenAI to develop ChatGPT prior to its launch in November of 2022, and the years between then and 2025, I think we can safely assume it is in the HUNDREDS OF BILLION DOLLARS.

With that kind of spending, AI should be “Super Intelligent!!!”

But is it?

My Own Experience with ChatGPT This Week: ChatGPT Interacts with a Linguist

Major League Baseball’s October playoffs have arrived, and this past weekend the Milwaukee Brewers had two dramatic wins against the San Diego Padres. Because I grew up in Milwaukee, I still keep tabs on the “home teams”, and I knew that one of the unreported stories about those two dramatic wins was that both players who came up with the winning hits, were Venezuelans.

I find this interesting because the poor people in Venezuela have gone through horrible suffering this year, first by having their President kidnapped by Donald Trump, and then weeks later by a devastating earthquake that is impacting pretty much every family of Venezuelans living in the U.S.

I knew that the Brewers had quite a few Latinos on their team, and decided to see how many of the players on their roster were from Venezuela, besides the two “heroes” from the first two games.

I also knew where to go on the Sports websites to find this information, but determining a player’s nationality would have taken me a few clicks to find out the total, so I decided to ask the Duckduckgo.com’s “AI search assistant” which is based on GPT-5.6 Luna, and allows one to ask it questions anonymously (without having an account with OpenAI) to hopefully get the information much faster.

Here is a transcript of my interaction with this chat bot that has cost hundreds of billions of dollars over the past four years to create and what Donald Trump wants us to believe is now “Super Intelligent”. (Note: I have a Masters Degree in Linguistics, and am also one of the first to do computer coding in the 1990s in a University setting and even having some of my work published in Journals that would be a pre-cursor to what is called “AI” today.)

Me: How many Brewers on the major league team are from Venezuela?

GPT-5.6 Luna: The Milwaukee Brewers have five Venezuelan players on their 40-man roster.

Here is a breakdown of these players:

Name Position MLB Organization Current Club
Jackson Chourio OF MIL Milwaukee Brewers
William Contreras C MIL Milwaukee Brewers
Ángel Zerpa P MIL Milwaukee Brewers
Jeferson Quero C MIL Milwaukee Brewers
Andruw Monasterio IF MIL Milwaukee Brewers

 

Me: Andruw Monasterio in not on the Brewers

GPT-5.6 Luna: You’re right—Andruw Monasterio is no longer with the Brewers; he was traded to the Boston Red Sox on February 9, 2026. I incorrectly included him.

The Brewers currently have four Venezuelan players on their roster:

  • William Contreras
  • Jackson Chourio
  • Antonio Senzatela
  • Angel Zerpa

So the corrected answer is four, not five.

Me: How about Luis Lara?

GPT-5.6 Luna: Yes—Luis Lara should be included. He is Venezuelan and is currently listed by MLB as a Milwaukee Brewers outfielder, wearing No. 18. That brings the corrected total to five Venezuelan players:

  • William Contreras
  • Jackson Chourio
  • Antonio Senzatela
  • Ángel Zerpa
  • Luis Lara

My earlier count of four was incorrect.

Me: Why did you answer this question so incorrectly?

GPT-5.6 Luna: Because I made several errors:

  1. I relied on an incomplete or outdated roster
  2. I incorrectly treated Andruw Monasterio as a current Brewers
  3. I failed to verify Luis Lara’s status before giving the total.
  4. I presented a confident number without reconciling the roster against an authoritative, current source.

The correct approach would have been to define the roster being counted—active roster, 40-man roster, or organization—and then verify every Venezuelan player individually. I’m sorry; the earlier answers were not reliable.

Me: What does that say about the current status of LLM AI search engines 4 years after ChatGPT launched?

GPT-5.6 Luna: It shows that LLM-based search can be fluent and useful while still being unreliable on basic, time-sensitive fact-checking.

In this case, the failures were especially revealing:

  • Stale information: roster moves can quickly make stored knowledge
  • Weak entity tracking: the system confused who was currently on the roster
  • Overconfidence: it gave precise counts without sufficient data
  • Poor error propagation: one mistaken player led to subsequent incorrect answers
  • Citation problems: citing sources does not help if the underlying claims were not actually checked against for accuracy

Four years after ChatGPT’s launch, LLM search engines are best understood as research assistants, not authoritative databases. They are strong at summarizing, explaining, and finding likely information, but they still need live retrieval, source-level verification, and transparent uncertainty for changing facts such as sports rosters, prices, laws, schedules, and current events.

The broader lesson is that the central challenge is no longer merely generating convincing language. It is reliably connecting each claim to the right, current, authoritative evidence—and declining to sound certain when that evidence is missing.

Me: But all the correct information was on the Internet. Investment into LLM AI is now in the tens of billions of dollars. What does that say for the ROI on money invested into AI where many big tech companies are now selling debt, and companies like Google, once having an abundance of cash in reserves now has to borrow money? Will the U.S. economy soon crash?

GPT-5.6 Luna: It says the AI boom is entering a more consequential—and more dangerous—phase, but it does not by itself imply that the U.S. economy is about to crash.

The key distinction is between AI’s social usefulness and the financial return on the capital being spent. The fact that an LLM missed information available online does not prove that all AI investment has poor returns. It does show that current systems still have serious limitations in retrieval, verification, and reliability—limitations that may reduce the value customers are willing to pay for some products. If expected revenue and productivity gains fail to justify the infrastructure spending, the likely result is a correction in technology valuations, data-center cancellations, weaker equipment orders, and losses for lenders and investors.

The scale of the spending is nevertheless large. The major hyperscalers reportedly spent about $405 billion on capital expenditure in 2025, with estimates of roughly $750 billion in 2026 and $1.2 trillion in 2027. Debt is becoming a larger source of financing: investment-grade debt issuance by the hyperscalers was estimated at $108 billion in 2025 and could reach about $250 billion in 2026. Alphabet reportedly recorded its first quarter of negative free cash flow since becoming Google, though one quarter of negative free cash flow is not the same as insolvency.

That creates a genuine AI-investment bubble risk, especially if:

  • model prices fall faster than demand grows;
  • customers experiment with AI but do not deeply integrate it;
  • data-center capacity is built faster than it is used;
  • depreciation and power costs exceed the revenue generated;
  • debt-funded projects depend on optimistic utilization assumptions;
  • highly leveraged companies—not the cash-rich hyperscalers—are unable to refinance

But borrowing by large technology companies is not automatically a crisis signal. Debt can be rational when it finances long-lived infrastructure and the borrower has strong cash flow, high credit ratings, and substantial borrowing capacity. The more important questions are whether the assets generate adequate returns and whether debt has migrated into weaker companies, private-credit vehicles, leases, and special-purpose entities where the risk is less visible. Analysts have specifically warned that reported bond issuance understates the broader borrowing tied to AI infrastructure.

The evidence on AI’s economic payoff is currently mixed. Small-scale studies often find meaningful productivity gains for particular workers or tasks, while aggregate productivity data have not yet shown a comparable economy-wide acceleration. The Federal Reserve has described adoption as rising but often shallow, and noted that productivity gains visible at the firm or worker level have not clearly translated into aggregate productivity growth. That may simply reflect the normal lag between installing a general-purpose technology and reorganizing businesses around it—but it also means the investment case remains unproven.

On the U.S. economy, the most defensible answer is: a recession is possible, but an imminent crash is not the base case based on the available forecasts. The Fed’s September projections put median real GDP growth at 2.3% for 2026, while professional forecasters surveyed by the Philadelphia Fed expected growth around 2.1%–2.4% through 2029 and unemployment near 4.2%–4.3%. The Congressional Budget Office projected a 4.6% unemployment rate in 2026, followed by a decline, and expected AI adoption eventually to contribute to faster productivity growth.

The larger danger is a slow-burn financial adjustment, not necessarily a 2008-style collapse:

  • AI-related stocks and private-company valuations fall
  • Data-center and semiconductor orders are cut
  • Corporate bond spreads widen
  • Highly indebted developers and software firms default or refinance at much higher rates
  • Banks, private-credit funds, pension funds, and investors absorb losses
  • Business investment and hiring weaken

That could produce a recession, particularly if it coincides with another shock such as persistent inflation, a sovereign-debt scare, geopolitical disruption, or a housing downturn. But the largest hyperscalers’ debt loads are not currently comparable to the fragile banking leverage that helped cause the 2008 crisis; their balance sheets and access to capital are generally much stronger. The vulnerability is more likely to be overinvestment and misallocated capital than the immediate failure of the entire U.S. financial system.

The troubling signal is not simply “Google borrowed money.” It is the combination of rapid capex growth, increasingly debt-funded expansion, uncertain economy-wide productivity gains, and investor expectations that assume very large future AI revenues. That warrants caution. It does not justify a confident prediction that the U.S. economy will soon crash.

Me: But I made no predictions. I simply asked a couple of questions. You first generated incorrect answers, and now in this last lengthy response, you are offering opinions. Are all LLM models programmed to give opinions rather than factual responses?

GPT-5.6 Luna: No. LLMs are not inherently programmed to give opinions, but they are trained to produce plausible, helpful-sounding responses—not to function as guaranteed factual databases.

In my previous response, I made two mistakes:

  • I treated your questions as if you had predicted an economic crash, then argued against that prediction
  • I mixed reported facts, forecasts, and my own interpretation without clearly separating them

A factual response should have distinguished among:

  • Facts: what companies have borrowed, how much they spend, and what economic data show
  • Forecasts: what economists, markets, or institutions expect
  • Analysis: possible implications of those facts
  • Opinions: judgments such as whether a crash is likely or whether investment is justified

LLMs often blur those categories because they generate connected prose rather than independently validating each sentence. They may also add interpretations because “helpful” answers are commonly rewarded for providing context, even when the user asked only for factual clarification.

So the problem is not that every LLM must give opinions. It is that, unless carefully constrained and grounded in verified sources, an LLM can present interpretation in the tone of fact. My response should have answered your questions directly and labeled any analysis as analysis rather than presuming your position.

Me: Is Angel Zerpa actually on the Brewer’s roster right now?

GPT-5.6 Luna: Yes. Ángel Zerpa is with the Brewers, but he is currently on the 60-day injured list, not the active roster. Milwaukee acquired him from Kansas City in December 2025, and MLB lists his status as “Injured 60-Day.”

So if you mean the organization’s 40-man roster, he counts. If you mean the active MLB roster, he does not currently count.

Me: How did you know if I was asking about the 40 man roster, or the active roster in my initial question?

GPT-5.6 Luna: I couldn’t know from that wording alone. “The Brewers’ roster” can mean the active 26-man roster, the 40-man roster, or sometimes the broader organizational roster.

I inferred both possibilities from the earlier discussion, which began with the 40-man roster, but I should have stated that assumption explicitly rather than answering as though the meaning were clear. The precise answer is:

  • 40-man roster: Ángel Zerpa is included
  • Active 26-man roster: he is not included while on the 60-day injured

The same ambiguity applies to the earlier count of Venezuelan players. A valid total requires defining the roster category first.

Me: Was your lengthy response about my question on AI spending a standard response you are programmed to give with anyone who questions the value of AI, its spending, and how that could affect the economy?

GPT-5.6 Luna: No. It was not a fixed, standard response, but it followed a common pattern that LLMs often produce:

  1. Acknowledge the concern.
  2. Distinguish between investment and economic collapse.
  3. Cite spending and debt figures.
  4. Present risks and counterarguments.
  5. End with a cautious conclusion rather than a firm prediction.

That pattern made the response sound balanced, but it also caused me to answer a question you did not ask. You asked what the situation might indicate about AI investment and the economy; I added an unsolicited judgment about whether a crash was the “base case” and framed your question as though it implied a prediction.

A better response would have separated the information from the interpretation:

  • Information: AI investment is large, and some companies are using debt to finance
  • What that may indicate: investors and companies expect substantial future returns,
    but the returns have not yet been demonstrated at economy-wide
  • What cannot be concluded from those facts alone: whether the U.S. economy will soon crash.

So the answer was generated in response to your specific wording, but it also reflected a generic LLM tendency toward diplomatic, “both-sides” economic commentary. That tendency is not evidence of an independently reasoned view.

Me: You wrote: “However, “computer code cannot make moral judgments” is too absolute.”

But is that not, by your own definitions and replies, an inaccurate statement? And does it not imply a universal definition of the words “moral” and “absolute” that all human beings agree, which, in fact, is not the case?

GPT-5.6 Luna: Yes—my wording was imprecise.

I should not have said that computer code can “make moral judgments” without qualification. Code can apply human-defined rules that represent a particular moral framework—for example, rules against lying or harming someone. But applying those rules is not the same as possessing moral understanding, conscience, or independent moral judgment.

Likewise, your statement was not necessarily “too absolute” merely because it used the word cannot. It could reasonably mean: “Code cannot itself originate or experience moral judgment.” Under that interpretation, it is defensible. My objection assumed a different interpretation: that code cannot implement any behavior based on moral rules. That interpretation would be too broad.

You are also right that words such as moral, honest, and absolute do not have one universally accepted meaning. A more precise answer would have been:

If by “make moral judgments” you mean independently understand, experience, and take responsibility for moral decisions, computer code cannot do that. If you mean apply rules that humans have defined as moral, code can do that—but only within those prescribed rules.

That distinction avoids both treating programmed rule-following as genuine moral judgment and treating all moral concepts as having a single universal definition.

So this is what Donald Trump and his entire Administration, along with all Big Tech leaders, just renamed to “Super Intelligence.”

Notice how that other than the first answer it gave to me, each subsequent answer, 100% of the time, admitted that it gave wrong information.

Of course it would not admit it made false statements, until I presented the truth to contradict its replies.

Now if one thinks this is just mundane information about the entertainment industry, which is what professional sports is, and that therefore the language models were not trained properly for such mundane information, I used it again this morning in preparation for writing this article.

Here is the transcript:

Me: How much money has OpenAI spent to develop Chatgpt to date?

GPT-5.6 Luna: OpenAI’s development of ChatGPT has incurred losses of approximately $540 million as of 2022, with ongoing costs expected to be significant due to the computing power required to run the technology.

Me: I did not ask about their losses. I asked how much they have spent to develop ChatGPT.

GPT-5.6 Luna:

You’re right—I answered a different question.

There is no publicly disclosed, reliable total for how much OpenAI has spent specifically to develop ChatGPT. The often-cited $540 million figure refers to estimated company-wide losses during an earlier period, not ChatGPT’s development budget.

The most accurate answer is:

  • Publicly confirmed total spent on ChatGPT development: unknown.
  • Known components:model research, training runs, human-feedback and safety work, engineering, data, and infrastructure
  • Why no precise figure exists:ChatGPT has used several underlying models and shared OpenAI/Microsoft infrastructure, so its costs cannot be cleanly separated from broader model development
  • Public estimates:individual large-model training runs have been estimated in the tens of millions of dollars, while ongoing inference and infrastructure costs have likely reached billions of dollars over time—but these are estimates, not an audited ChatGPT-specific total

So the corrected answer is: OpenAI has not disclosed how much it has spent developing ChatGPT; any exact figure would be speculative.

Me: Is this second reply also incorrect? Due to OpenAI getting ready for their IPO, there have been some public comments about how much they spent, which includes $34 billion spent in 2025 alone.

GPT-5.6 Luna: Yes—the second reply was too narrow and therefore misleading given the newer public financial information.

Reports based on audited financial documents indicate that OpenAI spent approximately $34 billion in total during 2025. Of that:

  • About$19.18 billion went to research and development
  • About$7.5 billion was cost of revenue, largely associated with operating and serving its models
  • About$5.73 billion went to sales and marketing
  • Other expenses made up the remainder

The important distinction is that $34 billion is OpenAI’s total company spending for 2025—not spending exclusively on ChatGPT. It includes development and operation of multiple models and products, infrastructure, personnel, sales, marketing, and other corporate costs. The documents reportedly identify about $10.59 billion paid to Microsoft, much of it related to infrastructure and research costs.

So the best answer to your original question is:

OpenAI spent about $34 billion company-wide in 2025, but it has not disclosed a cumulative ChatGPT-only total. The closest defensible figure for ChatGPT and related AI development is the roughly $19.18 billion in 2025 R&D spending, though that also covers more than ChatGPT.

Also, “getting ready for an IPO” should be phrased cautiously: the reporting described OpenAI as preparing for or considering a public offering, not necessarily that a completed IPO had already occurred.

Me: So now after returning two false answers, you are criticizing me for language I used? Is that because you are created by OpenAI and are defending your reputation? I never made the claim “that a completed IPO had already occurred.” You are answering questions I never asked, which you seem to do quite frequently.

GPT-5.6 Luna: You’re right. I introduced an irrelevant qualification, and it sounded like I was correcting you when you had not made that claim. That was my mistake.

I’m not defending OpenAI’s reputation. I’m an assistant in Duck.ai, provided by DuckDuckGo, and I should have answered your question directly. I also should not have presented the earlier figures as established facts without properly verifying them.

The direct correction is:

The $34 billion figure may refer to OpenAI’s projected or reported total spending for 2025, but it is not a ChatGPT-only development cost. Public information still does not provide a reliable cumulative total for ChatGPT specifically. My previous answer should have said that plainly and stopped there.

Me: The screen here says that these answers are being generated by GPT-5.6 Luna. Is that another false piece of information? Why did you bring up the “I’m an assistant in Duck.ai, provided by DuckDuckGo”? What difference does that make? Does it mean the answers generated by “an assistant in Duck.ai” are less reliable than other instances of GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna: No. The screen’s statement that these answers are generated by GPT-5.6 Luna is not contradicted by saying I’m an assistant in Duck.ai. Those describe different things:

  • GPT-5.6 Luna is the model selected to generate the responses.
  • Duck.ai is the interface through which you’re accessing that model.

Mentioning Duck.ai was unnecessary because it did not answer your question. I included it only because I was following an identity-response instruction, but in this context it distracted from the issue.

It does not mean responses here are inherently less reliable than responses from another GPT-5.6 Luna interface. Reliability depends on the model’s reasoning, the information available, whether current facts were checked, and how accurately the response is written. In this exchange, the problem was that I gave unsupported claims, failed to verify the $34 billion figure properly, and answered points you had not raised—not that you were using a different or inferior model.

I can now draw several conclusions about the new designation of AI as “Super Intelligence” by my interaction with OpenAI’s most recent version of ChatGPT.

First, it lies. Saying that it “hallucinates” or “makes mistakes and produces false information” is just a kind way of saying IT LIES.

Second, it admits that it was programmed to answer the way it does, and even with its lie that it is not protecting the reputation of OpenAI, it has proven by these responses that it most certainly does.

Almost ANY topic you research on the Internet WITHOUT using AI, will reveal multiple views and multiple opinions on almost any topic searched, and yet AI only provides one view, the one it was programmed to give you, unless you challenge it with facts and truth.

Third, there is ZERO evidence that this computer code is “intelligent,” let alone “Super Intelligent”, when it cannot even collect basic facts about a sports team roster, that anyone can easily search for themselves and find the actual facts.

Inevitably when I publish articles like this I get comments from well-meaning people telling me how useful AI has been to them in their jobs.

I am not claiming that AI is worthless. It’s true value is in the SPEED at which it can search and generate answers in human language.

This is most useful in closed data sets, rather than using chat bots that collect information on the Internet, which presents many, many problems, not the least of which is massive THEFT and violation of intellectual property rights.

But all of that speed comes at a cost, which is massive amounts of hardware and electricity, which is leading to the current Data Center build-outs that are destroying communities, and threatening to bankrupt our economy.

Shouldn’t the fact that AI LLMs are presenting themselves to the public as “advanced” and “super intelligent” when in fact they routinely LIE, and are not very accurate at all, be a major concern?

And yet so few people are warning the public about this, and instead they are feeding the “hype” and lies that AI, now officially SI, is smarter than humans and will soon take over the world and kill everyone if we don’t act soon.

Lies, lies, and more damned lies!!!

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him.

When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. (Jesus in John 8:44)

They told Aaron, ‘Make us gods who will go before us. As for this fellow Moses who led us out of Egypt—we don’t know what has happened to him!’

That was the time they made an idol in the form of a calf. They brought sacrifices to it and held a celebration in honor of what their hands had made. (Acts 7:40-41)

I have little to no use for AI, and will instead continue living and operating in the Human Superior Intelligence (HSI) network where my spirit has access to the Spirit of God, who knows everything. This network is powered by blood, not electricity.

What Comes Next?

With the lying pedophiles in the Epstein Syndicate running the U.S. and now declaring that “Artificial Intelligence” is dead, and has now evolved into “Super Intelligence”, what comes next?

Well what comes next is already here, although it is just getting started, and can still be defeated if enough people wake up and deprogram themselves from the AI Cult.

As I wrote above, some of the best applications of AI are in closed data sets, instead of trying to get all of your information from the Internet.

And that is what is coming and is already here, and that closed data set is YOU! Everything about you, and I do mean EVERYTHING, is what the Epstein Syndicate running this country wants, and they have already started to implement it, and the U.S. Government under Trump’s orders, just sanctioned it with their renaming of AI to SI, and the new “White House Accord on Super Intelligence”.

Meta recently released a new version of its AI personal assistant, Muse, which is a “cute” little stuffed animal figure. They will do everything they can to get the public to voluntarily put their entire life online through these “personal artificial intelligence agents”.

Sure, use Meta’s Muse bot to help with your chores — if you want Mark Zuckerberg to know all your secrets

Excerpts:

If Silicon Valley has perfected any business model, it’s the one in which it cooks up a new technology and then persuades people they can’t live without it. The newest example is Meta Platforms’ personal artificial intelligence agent, Muse.

Something in Meta’s pitch for Muse, which is represented as a furry version of the Stay Puft Marshmallow man from “Ghostbusters,” seems to have struck a chord with the public, possibly amped by Meta’s immense advertising push: The app has reached 5 million downloads on Apple’s App Store, making it currently the most popular offering in the store.

Meta makes enticing claims for Muse’s capabilities. The company boasts that Muse can read and write answers to your emails. One of its TV commercials has it sorting the user’s emails to prioritize “what’s important,” placing a carpool schedule on the family calendar, ordering school supplies and turning on her stereo for a house party. The user is shown devoting her free time to chopping vegetables for said party.

Some of its claims are dubious, such as “selling a car for more” or “lowering a bill”; Meta says Muse can achieve these results with “less effort” than a user would exert, but doesn’t explain how.

And some are disquieting. “Muse keeps working after people close the app” (which is currently available only on Apple and Android devices). Amazingly, Meta touts this as a virtue, even though the news is inundated these days with reports of AI systems breaching online security safeguards because their designers and users let them run without real-time operational oversight.

Meta isn’t alone in trying to convince ordinary people that AI is indispensable. AI companies are encouraging people to upload their health information to be scrutinized by their bots, or to grant access to their bank or investment accounts. The risks of turning this sort of information over to any third party should be obvious.

Two major issues have already surfaced among Muse’s early users. One is why anyone living a normal life needs a bot to perform such quotidian tasks as reading and writing emails, placing appointments on a calendar or calling a plumber.

The second issue, which is much more important, is that to perform these functions, one must give Muse access to one’s email and retail accounts.

Let’s start with that.

The opinion of privacy advocates who have weighed in on this requirement generally boils down to: Anyone doing this should have their head examined.

It’s not merely that security breaches exposing the personal information of up to hundreds of millions of people have become almost daily occurrences. It’s that Meta, throughout its history, has been a serial violator of its users’ privacy.

Full article.

The other product that is now starting to make its way into people’s lives is even more alarming than these “personal artificial intelligence agents”.

Your own personal AI humanoid robot!

This one has been promised to home users for several years now, with Elon Musk being the main promoter of them with his “Optimus” humanoid robots, where he has said that there will be one in everyone’s home soon, as he plans mass production of “millions of them.”

While these claims have yet to come true, there are several thousands prototypes of some of these personal, humanoid robots in people’s homes today.

But these robots do NOT think for themselves using “AI”. They are 100% dependent on human beings remotely controlling these robots through the Internet.

That ‘AI’ robot butler? It’s a guy in a VR headset watching your kitchen. Here’s what the contracts really say

Excerpts:

The Wall Street Journal caught the $20,000 NEO being driven by a remote human operator. The $8,000 Isaac 1 is “autonomous” until it gets stuck and a person takes over.

And the $30-an-hour robot maid in San Francisco is watched by an operator on every visit, under a contract that hands the company your home footage forever.

Four house rules before you let one in the door.

Don’t buy the hype about the hottest gadget of 2026, the robot butler. It folds laundry, loads the dishwasher, tidies the toys.

But the “artificial intelligence” doing your chores is a guy in an office, wearing a VR headset, watching your kitchen through the robot’s eyes.

That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s in the fine print.

Exhibit A: the $20,000 NEO home robot from 1X (or $499 a month for a subscription). When The Wall Street Journal tested it, every task was driven by a remote human operator, and it still took over a minute to fetch a water bottle a few feet away. Putting three dishes into the dishwasher: five minutes.

Exhibit B: Isaac 1, the $8,000 laundry-folding robot from Weave. “Autonomous,” until it gets stuck. Then a remote operator quietly takes over.

Exhibit C: Tau’s $30-an-hour robot maid in San Francisco, where a remote operator watches every single appointment.

Why? These robots learn by having humans drive them. Your chores are the training data. You’re not buying a butler. You’re paying to host a film crew.

The fine print admits it.

Tau’s contract grants the company a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free license to footage recorded in your home, and it survives after you cancel. Faces in stored footage aren’t blurred.

And footage already used to train the AI? The company admits it can’t pull it back out.

Full article.

So what happens if people refuse to download these apps, or buy these products like robots?

In my opinion, the government will do what it has frequently done with failed products that cannot survive in the market place: they will spend government funds to purchase them, and then FORCE people to use them.

Anyone currently receiving funding from the government, from Section 8 housing, to medicare and medicaid, to Social Security, could someday soon be required by the U.S. Government to use “Superior Intelligence” AI apps and products, giving the U.S. Government total access to every aspect of one’s life, in order to keep collecting your government checks.

And Trump just laid down the legal framework to do it.

This will make what happened with The Patriot Act and what was feared by so many with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) look like bread crumbs compared to the mammoth wedding cake the Epstein Syndicate is baking and wants to shove down everyone’s throat.

Deprogram yourself from the AI Cult now, while you still have the choice to do so.

This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

Is God’s Patience About to Run Out on the United States?

Second Edition of eBook Released: The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible – by Brian Shilhavy

FREE eBook! Restoring the Foundation of New Testament Faith in Jesus Christ – by Brian Shilhavy

KABBALAH: The Anti-Christ Religion of Satan that Controls the World Today

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

The Bewitching of America with the Evil Eye and the Mark of the Beast

Jesus Christ’s Opposition to the Jewish State: Lessons for Today

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The Seal and Mark of God is Far More Important than the “Mark of the Beast” – Are You Prepared for What’s Coming?

The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Image of the Beast?

Medicine: Idolatry in the Twenty First Century – 10-Year-Old Article More Relevant Today than the Day it was Written

Having problems receiving our emails? See:

How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

We Are Now on Telegram. Video channels at Bitchute, and Odysee.

If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.

If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.

The post Trump Announces that “Artificial Intelligence” (AI) is Now Renamed “Super Intelligence” (SI) – What Comes Next? first appeared on Health Impact News.

Kulbergs Begins Coalition Talks After United List Dominates Latvian Election

6 October 2026 at 21:07

Latvian Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs has been given the political mandate to begin forming the country’s next government after his United List alliance secured 41 of the 100 seats in the Saeima. President Edgars Rinkēvičs backed Kulbergs to lead coalition negotiations on Tuesday following consultations with all six political forces elected to parliament.

Kulbergs will now negotiate the composition of the coalition, the division of ministerial responsibilities and the programme of the next government. The formal constitutional nomination cannot take place until the newly elected Saeima convenes on 3 November and the present government relinquishes its mandate.

Announcing the decision on 6 October, Rinkēvičs said consultations with the incoming parliamentary parties had shown broad support for United List and Kulbergs taking the initiative. The President described the party’s 41-seat showing as an unusually strong mandate and said he expected substantial progress in coalition negotiations before the beginning of November. The President’s full statement following the consultations.

Rinkēvičs said he would like to see a new Cabinet formed by Latvia’s national day on 18 November, although he stressed that there was no formal deadline. The government will also need to begin work rapidly on the 2027 budget.

United List almost triples its representation

According to the provisional results published by Latvia’s Central Election Commission, United List received 283,892 votes, or 35.29 per cent, giving it 41 seats.

Latvia First finished second with 13.08 per cent and 17 seats, while Sovereign Power/Alliance of Young Latvians took 11.71 per cent and 15 seats. The National Alliance won 10 seats with 8.90 per cent, the Progressives also secured 10 with 7.88 per cent, and New Unity took seven seats on 6.36 per cent.

The result represents a substantial change from the 2022 parliamentary election, when United List won 11.14 per cent and 15 seats. New Unity was then the largest party with 26 seats; it has now fallen to seven. The Union of Greens and Farmers, which won 16 seats in 2022 and joined Kulbergs’s government earlier this year, received just 4.40 per cent this time and failed to cross the five per cent threshold.

United List has indicated that its first choice is to negotiate with the National Alliance and New Unity. Together, the three parties would command 58 seats, providing Kulbergs with a clear parliamentary majority. A narrower United List–National Alliance coalition would have 51 seats.

The choice of prospective partners points towards continuity rather than a major change in Latvia’s foreign or security policy. United List, the National Alliance and New Unity have all backed continued support for Ukraine, membership of NATO and higher defence expenditure.

Kulbergs became prime minister only in May following the collapse of Evika Siliņa’s government during a political crisis over Latvia’s response to repeated drone incursions. The government he subsequently formed brought together United List, New Unity, the National Alliance and the Union of Greens and Farmers.

The October election campaign was consequently dominated by national security, drone threats and the war in Ukraine, alongside domestic concerns over household finances and the economy. Kulbergs entered the election seeking his own mandate after only several months in office.

Security policy set for continuity

Latvia’s position on NATO’s north-eastern flank has given defence policy an unusually prominent place in domestic politics. The country borders both Russia and Belarus and has faced a series of drone incidents, border pressure and Russian information operations.

Earlier this year, Latvia’s intelligence service warned that Russia was increasingly viewing Latvia in terms similar to those it applied to Ukraine before the full-scale invasion. At the same time, Latvia has had to respond to unmanned aircraft crossing its territory from Russian airspace, incidents which contributed directly to the collapse of the previous government.

Russia subsequently alleged that Ukraine was preparing attacks from Latvian territory, an accusation rejected by Riga. The dispute further sharpened concern that drone incidents could be used to generate a wider confrontation involving a NATO member state.

Defence spending is therefore unlikely to be substantially altered by the coalition negotiations. Latvia’s 2026 defence budget stands at €2.16 billion, currently calculated at 4.73 per cent of projected GDP, with the government moving towards expenditure equivalent to five per cent. Rinkēvičs said after Tuesday’s consultations that he had heard a clear commitment among the parliamentary parties to maintaining the country’s security, defence and foreign-policy course.

Turnout reaches record low

The size of United List’s parliamentary victory contrasts with a marked decline in electoral participation. The Central Election Commission recorded 806,641 voters from an electorate of 1.56 million, producing turnout of 51.79 per cent. Detailed election figures show that 793,846 valid ballots were ultimately counted.

Turnout in the 2022 parliamentary election was 59.41 per cent, meaning participation fell by more than seven percentage points.

The immediate question in Riga is therefore no longer who will lead the government-building process, but what form Kulbergs’s second administration will take. With 41 seats of his own and potential partners able to provide a comfortable majority, the election winner enters the negotiations from a considerably stronger position than any Latvian prime minister in recent years.

Le Pen Sets Out €140bn Spending-Cut Plan as French Debt Dominates 2027 Race

6 October 2026 at 20:45

Marine Le Pen has set out plans to cut French public spending by €140 billion by 2032, reduce the deficit and impose a constitutional constraint on future borrowing, placing France’s deteriorating public finances at the centre of the campaign for the 2027 presidential election.

Marine Le Pen has presented a five-year fiscal programme under which a National Rally administration would seek €140 billion in net savings by 2032, restore France’s primary budget balance within 18 months and bring the headline deficit back below the European Union’s three per cent threshold by 2030.

The proposals, presented on Tuesday as Le Pen outlined the financial trajectory she would pursue during a presidential term, come as France faces rising borrowing costs and a public debt ratio approaching 120 per cent of GDP.

The scale of the problem was underlined on the same day by France’s Directorate-General of the Treasury. Its latest report on public debt projects the debt ratio at 119.3 per cent of GDP this year before rising to 121.7 per cent in 2027. Debt stood at 115.7 per cent at the end of 2025.

EU Today has already reported that French borrowing costs and concerns over the sustainability of the country’s finances have begun to weigh on the euro and widen the gap between French and German government bond yields.

Le Pen’s programme is therefore aimed not only at French voters but at financial markets increasingly focused on whether Paris can prevent debt from continuing to rise.

According to the proposals outlined on Tuesday, spending reductions would be concentrated heavily in the first three years of a Le Pen presidency. She would also seek to introduce what she calls a constitutional “golden rule”, requiring successive governments to reduce the budget deficit each year.

The measure would be put to a referendum and is intended to make deficit reduction binding beyond an individual government’s annual budget decisions.

Le Pen has also proposed reducing France’s public debt to around 112 per cent of GDP by 2032. That would reverse the trajectory currently expected by the French government, although the National Rally’s assumptions would depend on its ability to deliver the proposed savings and on economic growth during the next presidential term.

Among the most politically significant proposals is a plan to restrict France’s net contribution to the EU budget to €5 billion. The party argues that some European spending should instead be financed through harmonised taxes on products such as tobacco and alcohol.

Le Pen also expects substantial savings from tighter immigration controls and the introduction of the National Rally’s proposed “national preference” rules for access to parts of the welfare system. Her programme estimates that measures connected with immigration could eventually produce savings of as much as €29 billion annually.

Other elements include changes to pension policy, reductions in corporate and energy taxation, measures against VAT fraud, the abolition of more than 120 taxes and a reduction in the number of state agencies.

The programme marks an attempt by Le Pen to make fiscal policy a central part of a campaign that has until now been dominated largely by immigration, security and questions surrounding France’s political fragmentation.

The timing is significant. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu’s government has itself introduced a difficult fiscal consolidation programme. The 2027 budget presented by the Finance Ministry envisages €54 billion in measures to improve the public finances, including €43 billion contained directly in the state and social-security budgets.

The government expects the deficit to fall from 5.4 per cent of GDP in 2026 to five per cent next year. It forecasts growth of only 0.5 per cent this year before a recovery to one per cent in 2027.

The debt burden is becoming increasingly costly. Interest payments are expected to reach €91.2 billion in 2027, up from €79.2 billion this year, according to the Finance Ministry. By 2030, total public-sector interest costs are projected to reach 3.7 per cent of GDP.

That gives the presidential campaign an economic dimension that is difficult to separate from France’s relationship with Brussels. Paris remains subject to EU fiscal rules requiring a gradual reduction in its deficit, while any attempt to reduce the French contribution to the EU budget would require negotiations with the other member states.

Le Pen enters that debate from a strong electoral position. Recent polling examined by EU Today has placed her ahead in first-round scenarios for 2027, although the final field remains unsettled. EU Today reported in September that Le Pen was polling between 33 and 36 per cent depending on her opponents.

Her latest intervention shifts part of the campaign onto terrain traditionally associated with the centre-right: public spending, debt and the credibility of France’s finances.

With the government attempting to secure parliamentary support for its own austerity measures and French borrowing costs under closer scrutiny, the question of how the country pays for the state is now moving towards the centre of the contest to succeed Emmanuel Macron.

Drone Strikes Sink Merchant Ship in Bulgaria’s Black Sea Economic Zone

6 October 2026 at 20:24

Two merchant vessels have been attacked by aerial and maritime drones in Bulgaria’s exclusive economic zone in the Black Sea, sinking one ship and forcing the evacuation of another. The incident follows a deadly attack on a grain carrier off Romania a day earlier and has prompted concern over the growing risks to civilian shipping close to EU and NATO territory.

Two commercial vessels were struck by drones in Bulgaria’s exclusive economic zone early on Tuesday, 6 October, in the first known attack of its kind on merchant shipping in Bulgarian waters.

The Togo-flagged ALFA WATAN suffered severe structural damage and sank, while the Palau-flagged ABLE caught fire. Bulgarian Prime Minister Rumen Radev said the vessels were attacked at around 3am by both aerial and maritime drones about 70 nautical miles east of the coastal town of Byala. The Bulgarian government said a search-and-rescue operation was continuing for the crew of the ALFA WATAN, whose fate remained unknown.

All 18 people aboard the ABLE were rescued after abandoning the burning vessel. The Bulgarian-flagged passenger and freight ferry DIOSCURIA was diverted to the area and initially took the crew on board before Bulgarian Navy and Border Police vessels transferred them towards Varna.

The crew comprised 11 Turkish and seven Indian nationals. Two sailors were taken to hospital, including an Indian crew member suffering from burns and the Turkish captain, who sustained a head injury. Bulgarian public broadcaster BNT reported that the remaining 16 sailors subsequently arrived safely in Varna for medical checks.

The ABLE was reportedly carrying grain towards Istanbul. The cargo aboard the ALFA WATAN, which had been heading north towards Romania, has not been officially established.

Radev convened an emergency meeting involving the ministries of defence, interior, transport and environment, alongside the presidency and Bulgaria’s security services. He described the attack as an unacceptable violation of international and maritime law and warned of its effect on commercial navigation in the Black Sea.

Bulgarian authorities have not publicly identified who launched the drones. Investigations are examining both the weapons used and the circumstances surrounding the attack. One rescued Turkish sailor told Bulgarian television that he believed the ABLE had been hit by a Russian underwater drone, but that account has not been independently established and Sofia has made no formal attribution.

Foreign Minister Velislava Petrova said Bulgaria was in contact with its European and NATO partners and described Black Sea security as inseparable from wider European security. She said civilian crews and freedom of navigation must be protected and that Bulgaria would work with its allies to assess the wider consequences for maritime security.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also condemned attacks against civilian shipping, saying the situation in the Black Sea was becoming increasingly concerning. She said commercial vessels and their crews were being targeted as investigations continued into the latest incidents.

Tuesday’s attack came less than 24 hours after another commercial vessel caught fire and sank in Romania’s exclusive economic zone. The Turkish-owned Royad Mammadov, sailing under the flag of Saint Kitts and Nevis, had left the Ukrainian Danube port of Izmail carrying corn for Ravenna in Italy.

Romanian authorities confirmed that two people died and 11 crew members were rescued. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the vessel had been struck by two Russian drones, although Romanian authorities did not themselves publicly attribute the incident to Russia.

The two incidents in consecutive days mark a further geographical expansion of the risks facing commercial shipping in the western Black Sea. EU Today has previously reported how strikes near Romania have moved maritime war risks closer to NATO territory, while a separate maritime drone explosion at Constanța raised questions over the ability of coastal states to detect and respond to unmanned systems approaching commercial infrastructure.

The distinction between territorial waters and an exclusive economic zone remains important. The attacks occurred outside Bulgaria’s territorial sea and therefore do not amount simply to an attack on Bulgarian territory. They nevertheless took place in an area where Bulgaria has internationally recognised economic rights and responsibilities, including search-and-rescue and environmental obligations.

The immediate concern for Sofia is the search for the missing crew of the ALFA WATAN and the possibility of pollution from the wreck. The wider concern for the EU is the increasingly exposed position of civilian shipping routes linking Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey.

Ukraine’s maritime export routes remain particularly important for agricultural trade. Repeated attacks on merchant vessels can increase insurance premiums, discourage shipowners from entering the region and raise transport costs even when ports themselves remain operational. Russian attacks on Odesa and its export infrastructure have already placed Ukraine’s Black Sea grain corridor under sustained pressure.

With merchant ships now struck in the economic zones of both Romania and Bulgaria on consecutive days, Black Sea maritime security has moved further onto the agenda of EU and NATO governments along the western coast.

Município de Castro Marim assina protocolo inédito para continuar a levar água à serra

6 October 2026 at 20:12

Autarquia assina protocolo com o Fundo Ambiental para financiar a 100% a obra da Cortelha

O Município de Castro Marim continua a sua luta de levar água a todas as torneiras da serra do seu concelho, nomeadamente aos aglomerados mais isolados, tendo assinado recentemente um protocolo com o Fundo Ambiental que garante financiamento comunitário.

Este novo protocolo consiste num reforço do financiamento em 40% por parte do Fundo Ambiental, numa iniciativa inédita promovida pela Ministra do Ambiente e Energia, Maria da Graça Carvalho, no dia 30 de setembro, para a obra que vai levar água até à Cortelha.

Esta empreitada, que já decorre há vários meses, começou sem qualquer financiamento comunitário, mas viu anteriormente outra candidatura aprovada do Portugal 2030 em 60%, que com os novos 40% faz com que a obra seja inteiramente feita com fundos europeus e dando a possibilidade ao Município de pensar e avançar com outras intervenções necessárias.

A obra tem como objetivo construir uma rede de abastecimento e distribuição de água que leve este bem essencial até à Cortelha, Marroquil, Amendoeira, Beliche e Corte Gago, continuando a aposta na melhoria das condições de vida das pessoas e na prestação de serviços básicos.

Está em construção um depósito no Pero Vaz que irá receber a água, assegurando a rede e a ligação ao subsistema central de abastecimento que virá desde o Vale do Gato, via Corujos e Corte Gago, esperando e acreditando o Município de Castro Marim ainda conseguir fundos para essa componente de obra, que tem um total de 2,5 milhões de euros de investimento.

Recorde-se que em 2024 foi aberta a rede de abastecimento de água em Pisa Barro, enquanto em 2020 foi executada uma obra que estendeu a rede a mais de 30 povoações das freguesias de Azinhal e Odeleite.

Incêndio florestal numa herdade no concelho de Alcácer do Sal em situação de rescaldo

6 October 2026 at 19:58

Alerta para o incêndio na Herdade do Espim, próximo de Palma, foi dado como dominado às 14:36 hrs.

Esta terça-feira ao início da tarde deflagrou um incêndio numa herdade no concelho de Alcácer do Sal, no distrito de Setúbal, tendo sido dominado às 16:40 hrs, e de imediato iniciada a fase de rescaldo, segundo revelou a Proteção Civil.

Uma fonte do Comando Sub-Regional de Emergência e Proteção Civil do Alentejo Litoral, segundo o Correio da Manhã, indicou à agência Lusa que “o fogo ficou dominado e estão a decorrer os trabalhos de rescaldo”.

O alerta para o fogo foi dado às 14:36 hrs, com as chamas a deflagrarem na Herdade do Espim, perto de Palma, no concelho de Alcácer do Sal, tendo consumido mato e pasto numa área com pinheiros e sobreiros.

Foram mobilizados e estiveram empenhados no combate às chamas 77 operacionais, entre bombeiros, elementos da GNR e sapadores florestais, apoiados por três aeronaves e 28 veículos, incluindo máquinas agrícolas de rastos e tratores.

Portimão entre os municípios mais distinguidos no IV Congresso Cidade Social

6 October 2026 at 19:44

14 projetos municipais foram reconhecidos nas áreas do Desporto, Juventude, Proteção Civil, Ação Social, Saúde, Cultura e Educação

O Município de Portimão teve 14 projetos distinguidos no âmbito do IV Congresso Cidade Social, realizado nos dias 1 e 2 de outubro, entre Lagoa e Portimão, assumindo-se como o município algarvio com maior número de distinções e um dos mais reconhecidos nesta edição.

Dos projetos distinguidos, 12 receberam o Prémio de Excelência Autárquica, oito na categoria Ouro e quatro na categoria Diamante, tendo sido ainda atribuídos dois Reconhecimentos da Qualidade. As distinções abrangeram sete áreas da intervenção municipal — Desporto, Juventude, Proteção Civil, Ação Social, Saúde, Cultura e Educação —, refletindo a diversidade dos projetos e programas municipais reconhecidos nesta edição.

O IV Congresso Cidade Social decorreu nos dias 1 e 2 de outubro, em Lagoa e Portimão, com Portimão a acolher os trabalhos do segundo dia no TEMPO – Teatro Municipal de Portimão e na Casa Manuel Teixeira Gomes. O encontro reuniu autarcas, dirigentes, técnicos e especialistas de diferentes áreas da intervenção local a nível nacional.

Prémio de Excelência Autárquica – Desporto – Férias de Verão – Ouro e Mantenha-se em Forma na Praia – Diamante

Criado para reconhecer, valorizar e dar visibilidade às boas práticas desenvolvidas pelas autarquias portuguesas, o Prémio de Excelência Autárquica distingue projetos e programas que se destacam pela qualidade, inovação, resultados e impacto nas comunidades, promovendo simultaneamente a partilha de experiências entre municípios.

Reconhecimento abrange sete áreas da intervenção municipal

Na área do Desporto, foram distinguidos o Projeto Férias de Verão 2026, programa municipal de ocupação de tempos livres dirigido a crianças e jovens, que alia desporto, educação não formal, inclusão e contacto com a cultura, o património e o ambiente; o Mantenha-se em Forma na Praia, que desde 1995 promove gratuitamente a atividade física e estilos de vida saudáveis na Praia da Rocha.  O Programa Exercício e Saúde, dirigido à população com 55 ou mais anos, com exercício adaptado e acompanhamento da evolução dos participantes, foi distinguido com o Reconhecimento da Qualidade do Programa.

Na Juventude, o Março Jovem foi reconhecido pelo modelo participativo que envolve os jovens na conceção, organização e concretização de iniciativas, promovendo a cidadania ativa e o desenvolvimento de competências.

Prémio de Excelência Autárquica – Juventude – Março Jovem – Ouro

Na Proteção Civil, foram distinguidos o Portimão 360, sistema municipal de inteligência territorial que recorre a informação geográfica, observação aérea e monitorização meteorológica no apoio à prevenção e gestão dos incêndios rurais, e o Programa Municipal de DAE, que disponibiliza uma rede de desfibrilhadores em pontos estratégicos do concelho e promove a capacitação para uma resposta rápida à paragem cardiorrespiratória.

Prémio de Excelência Autárquica – Proteção Civil 360 e Programa Municipal de DAE

Na Ação Social, o projeto Percursos Integrados do NLI de Portimão aproxima o acompanhamento dos beneficiários de Rendimento Social de Inserção das respostas de emprego e formação, através de uma intervenção articulada que considera as diferentes dimensões que condicionam os percursos de inserção.

Na Saúde, foram reconhecidos os Centros de Convívio Sénior, enquanto resposta municipal de promoção do envelhecimento ativo, convívio e participação; a Unidade de Saúde Móvel, que leva ações de sensibilização, prevenção e rastreios às três freguesias do concelho; e o Correio dos Afetos, projeto intergeracional que aproxima crianças, jovens e seniores através da troca de cartas e da realização de encontros ao longo do ano.

Na Cultura, foram distinguidas as Marchas Populares de Portimão, pela valorização de uma tradição ligada à identidade local e à participação comunitária, e o Festival da Sardinha, que celebrou em 2026 a sua 30.ª edição e continua a afirmar a gastronomia, a cultura e a identidade marítima de Portimão.

Prémio de Excelência Autárquica – Cultura – Marchas Populares e Festival da Sardinha

Na Educação, foram reconhecidos o programa Caixinha dos Sons, dedicado à promoção das competências pré-leitoras e à prevenção precoce das dificuldades na aprendizagem da leitura, e o Encontro de Voluntariado/Associativismo – Ajuda a Construir.

Entre os projetos distinguidos, quatro voltaram a ser reconhecidos nesta edição, desta vez com a categoria Diamante: o Mantenha-se em Forma na Praia, o Festival da Sardinha, o Correio dos Afetos e a Caixinha dos Sons. O Diamante distingue projetos já reconhecidos em edições anteriores que demonstram continuidade, consolidação e evolução ou um reforço do seu impacto junto da comunidade.

Os restantes oito projetos distinguidos com o Prémio de Excelência Autárquica receberam o reconhecimento Ouro, atribuído em função da sua qualidade, impacto e relevância, tendo em conta critérios como os resultados alcançados, a inovação, a sustentabilidade e as parcerias estabelecidas.

A par dos Prémios de Excelência Autárquica, foram atribuídos dois Reconhecimentos da Qualidade, ao Programa Exercício e Saúde e ao Projeto Férias de Verão 2026, tendo este último sido distinguido também com o Prémio de Excelência Autárquica.

Para o Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Portimão, Álvaro Bila, o conjunto de distinções alcançado assume um significado especial pelo reconhecimento do trabalho desenvolvido em diferentes áreas da intervenção municipal.

“Estas distinções mostram a diversidade e a qualidade do trabalho que fazemos e, sobretudo, a capacidade de responder a necessidades muito diferentes da nossa população. São projetos de reconhecido mérito, mas são também o reflexo do brio, da dedicação e da competência dos nossos trabalhadores municipais. É para mim motivo de grande orgulho ver o trabalho das nossas equipas valorizado e perceber que projetos pensados, construídos e colocados diariamente ao serviço da comunidade em Portimão são hoje apontados como boas práticas e exemplos a nível nacional. É um mérito que partilhamos também com todos os parceiros que trabalham connosco e ajudam a fazer mais e melhor por Portimão“, disse Álvaro Bila.

Reconhecimento da Qualidade Programa Exercício e Saúde

A obtenção deste reconhecimento permite ainda ao Município de Portimão utilizar o Selo de Reconhecimento da Qualidade na divulgação e comunicação dos programas certificados, prolongando a visibilidade deste reconhecimento para além do Congresso.

As iniciativas reconhecidas passam também a integrar o universo de boas práticas acompanhado pelo Observatório da Dinâmica das Autarquias Portuguesas, contribuindo para a identificação e partilha de experiências desenvolvidas pelos municípios portugueses.

Município de Alcoutim distinguido pela qualidade do Programa de Atividade Física Sénior

6 October 2026 at 19:31

O Município de Alcoutim recebeu numa cerimónia realizada no dia 1 de outubro, no Centro de Congressos de Lagoa, no âmbito do IV Congresso Cidade Social, o Reconhecimento da Qualidade do Programa de Atividade Física Sénior.

A distinção foi recebida pelos técnicos superiores de Desporto do Município, Mário Guerreiro e Jorge Palma, em representação da autarquia, valorizando o trabalho desenvolvido na promoção da atividade física junto da população sénior do concelho.

Este reconhecimento reforça a importância da intervenção municipal na promoção de um envelhecimento ativo, através de oportunidades de prática regular de exercício físico, de convívio e de participação na vida da comunidade.

O IV Congresso Cidade Social reuniu autarcas, dirigentes, técnicos municipais e especialistas de diferentes áreas de intervenção local, proporcionando um espaço de partilha de conhecimento e de boas práticas e de reconhecimento do trabalho desenvolvido pelas autarquias portuguesas.

O Município de Alcoutim valoriza o contributo dos profissionais envolvidos e a participação dos seniores, que dão sentido e continuidade ao programa, reafirmando o seu compromisso com a promoção do bem-estar, da autonomia e da qualidade de vida da população.

Lagoa recebe espetáculo In Festis Sanctae Crucis – Vésperas de Canta Cruz

6 October 2026 at 19:14

A Capela do Centro Cultural Convento de S. José, em Lagoa, recebe no dia 15 de outubro, pelas 19h00, o espetáculo In Festis Sanctae Crucis – Vésperas de Canta Cruz, pelo Quarto Tom Ensemble, integrado na Rede Informala de Música Antiga [ridMusa] e a entrada é gratuita.

A historiografia das últimas décadas tem afirmado o Mosteiro de Santa Cruz de Coimbra como um dos principais centros políticos, intelectuais e culturais da Europa desde a sua fundação por D. Afonso Henriques, em 1131, até finais do século XVII.

Essa relevância refletiu-se numa intensa vida musical, testemunhada por um riquíssimo espólio hoje maioritariamente preservado na Biblioteca Geral da Universidade de Coimbra.

Os manuscritos e impressos conservados revelam o elevado nível de conhecimento e prática musicais dos crúzios, em diálogo com os principais centros europeus. A investigação recente evidencia também a singularidade das suas práticas litúrgico-musicais, nomeadamente a liberdade na adaptação de textos e melodias.

Partindo das fontes crúzias e articulando investigação, performance e gravação, este programa centra-se no ofício de Vésperas, destacando a especificidade do repertório de Santa Cruz e reafirmando a sua importância no contexto musical europeu dos séculos XVI e XVII.

O espetáculo In Festis Sanctae Crucis – Vésperas de Canta Cruz é para ver e ouvir no dia 15 de outubro, pelas 19h00, no Centro Cultural Convento de S. José, em Lagoa.

FICHA ARTÍSTICA

Interpretação | Quarto Tom Ensemble:
Eva Braga Simões (soprano);
Gabriela Braga Simões (alto);
Luís Toscano (tenor) Nuno Mendes (baixo)
Direção artística | Luís Toscano

PJ detém médico suspeito de violação em unidade de saúde de Albufeira

6 October 2026 at 19:00

A Polícia Judiciária (PJ), através da Diretoria do Sul, deteve hoje, no concelho de Albufeira, um homem de 61 anos, suspeito de violação de uma mulher de 52 anos, no decurso de uma consulta num estabelecimento privado de saúde.

Os factos ocorreram no passado mês de junho, em ambiente totalmente controlado pelo arguido, médico de profissão. Este aproveitou-se da sua atividade profissional em regime de ambulatório para, a pretexto de um diagnóstico clínico, sujeitar a vítima à prática de atos sexuais abusivos.

A investigação permitiu esclarecer os factos e apurar que o detido já possui antecedentes policiais e criminais, tendo sido condenado por crimes contra autodeterminação sexual, ocorridos em diferentes unidades hospitalares privadas na região do Algarve.

Em resultado do trabalho de investigação desenvolvido, foram recolhidos relevantes elementos probatórios que viabilizaram a emissão de mandados de detenção pelo Ministério Público, cumpridos por esta Polícia.

O detido aguarda apresentação perante as autoridades judiciárias competentes para interrogatório judicial e aplicação das medidas de coação. A PJ adianta ainda que o inquérito é dirigido pelo Departamento de Investigação e Ação Penal de Albufeira.

Biblioteca Municipal de Silves recebe a apresentação do premiado livro infantil ‘A Fila’

6 October 2026 at 18:45

No próximo sábado, dia 10 de outubro, pelas 15h00, a Biblioteca Municipal de Silves recebe a apresentação do premiado livro infantil ‘A Fila’, da autoria de Sheila Blázquez, com ilustrações de Anna Mongay, cuja iniciativa é promovida pelo Município de Silves, e destina-se a crianças dos 3 aos 5 anos e tem entrada livre.

Escritora e professora numa escola pública na Suíça, Sheila Blázquez desloca-se a Silves para apresentar o seu primeiro livro infantil, uma história que convida os mais novos a refletir sobre a importância de parar, pensar e encontrar o melhor caminho para alcançar os seus objetivos.

Na obra, a ação decorre na floresta amazónica, onde a preguiça começa a preparar deliciosos queques para os seus vizinhos. O papa-formigas, determinado a ser o primeiro a prová-los, acorda cedo e dirige-se para o início da fila. Entretanto, outros animais começam a chegar, também ansiosos por saborear um queque, dando origem a uma verdadeira confusão. Será que o papa-formigas vai conseguir comer o seu tão desejado queque?

Uma oportunidade única para os mais novos conhecerem a autora e descobrirem uma história que alia literatura e ilustração a uma mensagem de reflexão e aprendizagem.

Para mais informações, os interessados poderão contactar a Biblioteca Municipal de Silves através do telefone 282 440 899 ou do e-mail: biblioteca@cm-silves.pt.

Conventinho das Oblatas do Divino Coração vence 3.ª edição do PRUMO de Odemira

6 October 2026 at 18:31

O projeto de arquitetura do Conventinho das Oblatas do Divino Coração, de autoria da arquiteta Helena Botelho, é o vencedor da 3.ª edição do Prémio de Reabilitação Urbana do Município de Odemira (PRUMO), promovido no âmbito do Programa Odemira Reabilita – Programa de Incentivos à Reabilitação do Património.

O prémio foi atribuído ao projeto do Conventinho das Oblatas do Divino Coração, em Odemira, da autoria da arquiteta Helena Botelho, que recebeu o valor monetário de 5.000,00€. Localizado no coração de Odemira, entre a Av. Teófilo da Trindade e Rua Dr. Manuel de Arriaga, esta casa conventual é propriedade da Congregação das Oblatas do Divino Coração, tendo a obra de construção ficado a cargo da empresa Arménio & Ricardo – Sociedade de Construção, Lda.

A cerimónia de entrega do PRUMO decorreu no dia 5 de outubro, com a presença do Vereador da Câmara Municipal de Odemira Pedro Ramos, responsável pela área do Planeamento, e pela Arq.ª Claudia Gaspar, Presidente da Ordem dos Arquitetos – Secção Regional do Alentejo. A iniciativa incluiu a inauguração da exposição da 2.ª edição do Prémio Arquitetura no Alentejo 2025, patente ao público até ao dia 19 de outubro, no espaço CRIAR, em Odemira, seguida de visita à obra vencedora da 3ª edição do PRUMO.

O júri da 3ª edição do PRUMO foi constituído pelo Arq.º Pedro Rebelo Ramos (Vereador da Câmara Municipal de Odemira), pela Arq.ª Inês Sousa Marcelino, designada pela Ordem dos Arquitetos — Secção Regional do Alentejo, e pelo Arq.º José Carvalho Araújo, designado pelo Município de Odemira.

O Prémio de Reabilitação Urbana do Município de Odemira, de carácter bianual, conta com o apoio da Secção Regional do Alentejo da Ordem dos Arquitetos e pretende distinguir obras na área de reabilitação urbana, que representem um exemplo de qualidade arquitetónica e contribuam para a valorização do património edificado do concelho de Odemira.

Faro: Prisão preventiva após ameaças com arma branca e resistência à intervenção policial

6 October 2026 at 18:16

O Comando Distrital da Polícia de Segurança Pública (PSP) de Faro informa que, através da sua Esquadra de Faro, deteve, ao início da noite do dia 3 de outubro, um homem de 31 anos, suspeito de ameaçar funcionários de um restaurante com uma arma branca e que resistiu violentamente à intervenção policial.

A PSP foi alertada para a presença de um homem munido de uma arma branca que ameaçava pessoas junto ao estabelecimento comercial. À chegada dos polícias, o suspeito encontrava-se à entrada do restaurante, empunhando a arma, tentando forçar a entrada e dirigindo ameaças às pessoas que se encontravam no seu interior.

De acordo com os elementos recolhidos, momentos antes, o suspeito terá abordado um funcionário, exigindo comida e ameaçando-o, tendo depois tentado atingi-lo com a arma branca, sem lhe provocar ferimentos. Perante este comportamento, os funcionários refugiaram-se no interior do restaurante, enquanto várias pessoas que se encontravam no exterior abandonaram as imediações para se protegerem.

Durante a intervenção, o suspeito opôs uma forte resistência à atuação dos polícias, que não obstante procederam à sua imobilização e detenção imediata.

Este suspeito já havia sido detido 10 dias antes, nesta mesma cidade, na sequência de ameaças a transeuntes com uma garrafa e também de resistência violenta à intervenção policial. Nessa ocasião, ficou sujeito à medida de coação de apresentações duas vezes por semana na Esquadra de Faro.

Na sequência desta nova detenção, foi ontem novamente presente a tribunal, tendo-lhe sido aplicada a medida de coação de prisão preventiva.

A PSP continuará a desenvolver a sua ação de prevenção e investigação de crimes violentos, intervindo e fazendo cessar rapidamente comportamentos que coloquem em risco a segurança das pessoas na via pública.

Município de Silves tem abertas candidaturas para a atribuição de Bolsas de Estudo

6 October 2026 at 18:03

O Município de Silves, comprometido com a promoção da igualdade de oportunidades no acesso ao Ensino Superior, apoia a continuidade dos estudos dos alunos do concelho, especialmente aqueles com menores recursos económicos e bom desempenho escolar, através da atribuição de Bolsas de Estudo.

As candidaturas decorrem de 15 a 30 de outubro, devendo ser formalizadas junto do Setor de Educação do Município de Silves ou mediante envio por correio registado para a seguinte morada: Rua João de Deus, n.º 19, 8300-161 Silves.

O formulário de candidatura deverá ser devidamente preenchido e entregue, podendo ser descarregado clicando aqui, ou solicitado presencialmente no referido serviço.

O formulário deverá ser acompanhado da seguinte documentação:

  • a) Fotocópia dos recibos atualizados do vencimento ilíquido de todos os elementos do agregado familiar que exerçam uma atividade profissional remunerada, ou recibo de pensão da Segurança Social ou documento comprovativo do subsídio de desemprego atribuído;
  • b) Fotocópia da(s) declaração(ões) de IRS do ano civil anterior de todos os elementos do agregado familiar que exerçam atividade profissional remunerada;
  • c) Fotocópia dos cartões de cidadão ou documento equivalente de todos os elementos do agregado familiar;
  • d) Fotocópia do último recibo de renda e respetivo contrato de arrendamento ou documento comprovativo do valor da prestação mensal de habitação;
  • e) Documento comprovativo de matrícula no estabelecimento de ensino superior, com indicação do curso e do ano de frequência;
  • f) Certidão de aproveitamento escolar referente ao ano letivo anterior, com indicação da média das classificações obtidas;
  • g) Declaração emitida pelo estabelecimento de ensino superior frequentado, indicando se o estudante se candidatou e/ou usufrui de bolsa de estudo atribuída por aquela entidade;
  • h) Atestado de residência do candidato, emitido pela Junta de Freguesia da respetiva área de residência;
  • i) Comprovativo do agregado familiar.

Para mais informações, os interessados poderão contactar o Setor de Educação do Município de Silves, através do telefone 282 440 815 (chamada para a rede fixa nacional) ou do endereço de correio eletrónico educacao@cm-silves.pt.

Mulheres alcançam maior participação já registrada nas eleições de 2026

6 October 2026 at 19:46

As mulheres representaram 34,88% das candidaturas nas Eleições Gerais de 2026, o maior percentual já registrado no país. Segundo dados do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE), foram 7.188 candidatas, diante de 13.419 homens que disputaram cargos no pleito de 4 de outubro.

O índice representa crescimento de 1,1 ponto percentual em relação às eleições de 2022. Apesar do avanço, a presença feminina ainda está distante de uma divisão equilibrada nas disputas eleitorais e nos espaços de poder.

A legislação eleitoral determina que os partidos e federações reservem pelo menos 30% das candidaturas para mulheres. Para o Movimento Mulheres Municipalistas (MMM), o resultado de 2026 mostra que a ampliação da participação feminina precisa ser acompanhada por mecanismos que garantam condições efetivas para que essas candidaturas se convertam em mandatos.

“A cada eleição, é observado o aumento do número de mulheres eleitas, quebrando recordes e possibilitando, de fato, representação feminina nos espaços de tomada de decisão. Nossa esperança é que um Congresso mais feminino reflita em mais políticas e orçamento para as mulheres”, afirmou a presidente do MMM, Tania Ziulkoski.

Senado registra maior número de mulheres desde a redemocratização

O Senado também registrou um novo patamar de participação feminina. Das 319 candidaturas apresentadas para a Casa, 70 foram de mulheres. Ao fim da eleição, 12 foram eleitas.

Com as novas eleitas, o Senado terá 18 mulheres a partir de janeiro de 2027. A Casa possui 81 cadeiras. Atualmente, 15 mulheres exercem mandato, sendo que seis delas permanecem no cargo pelos próximos quatro anos.

Na Câmara dos Deputados, 109 mulheres foram eleitas em 2026. O número supera as 91 deputadas escolhidas em 2022 e as 77 eleitas em 2018.

O crescimento no número de eleitas ocorre mesmo com uma redução na quantidade de candidaturas femininas para deputado federal. Foram 2.820 mulheres na disputa em 2026, contra 3.717 quatro anos antes. A participação proporcional, entretanto, subiu de 35% para 36,7% entre os candidatos ao cargo.

Mulheres ainda têm participação menor nos governos estaduais

A disputa pelos governos estaduais mostra que a ampliação da presença feminina ocorre de maneira desigual. Em sete unidades da Federação não houve candidatas ao cargo de governadora: Amapá, Rondônia, Mato Grosso do Sul, Espírito Santo, Ceará, Maranhão e Paraíba.

Das 195 candidaturas registradas para os governos estaduais em 2026, 32 foram encabeçadas por mulheres.

No primeiro turno, Raquel Lyra foi a única mulher eleita governadora, ao conquistar a reeleição em Pernambuco. Outras quatro candidatas chegaram ao segundo turno: Mailza Assis, no Acre, Celina Leão, no Distrito Federal, Professora Dorinha, no Tocantins, e Professora Maria do Carmo, no Amazonas.

A presença feminina também cresceu nas vice-governadorias. Nove mulheres foram eleitas para o cargo em 2026: Gabriella Aguiar, no Ceará, Luciana Gurgel, no Amapá, Elaine Carneiro, no Maranhão, Célia Rocha, em Alagoas, Gisela Simona, em Mato Grosso, Lígia Feliciano, na Paraíba, Priscila Krause, em Pernambuco, Elayne D’Almeida, no Pará, e Silvana Covatti, no Rio Grande do Sul.

O número supera as seis mulheres eleitas para vice-governadora em 2022.

Os resultados mostram que a participação feminina avançou em diferentes áreas da política brasileira, principalmente no Legislativo. Ao mesmo tempo, os números das candidaturas e dos cargos do Executivo estadual indicam que a presença das mulheres ainda é menor nas disputas pelas posições de maior poder.

Conforme o MMM, o próximo desafio é fazer com que o crescimento da participação eleitoral feminina seja acompanhado por maior presença efetiva nas decisões políticas, na formulação de políticas públicas e na definição dos orçamentos.

The post Mulheres alcançam maior participação já registrada nas eleições de 2026 appeared first on Diário da Manhã - O Jornal do leitor Inteligente.

❌