The drone has become the signature weapon of the Russo-Ukraine war. On any day in Ukraine, tens of thousands of drones are out hunting the battlefield for targets. These could be individual enemy soldiers or vehicles, or they could be larger targets such as depots, headquarters, bridges or power plants. Yet, this drone war has […]
The post When the US slows down Starlink in Ukraine appeared first on Asia Times.
Nearly 48 hours after Ukraine's Starshield terminals started mysteriously malfunctioning, nobody in Washington, nor at SpaceX, has taken responsibility for the apparent decision to hobble Ukrainian military communications.
Starshield terminals — the militarized version of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet system — began losing connectivity as they
Tech billionaire Elon Musk wrote on X on 15 October: “And so the slaughter continues … Time for Zelensky to go.” Four days earlier, he had posted that Zelenskyy had gone too far, after US President Donald Trump said it was time for Ukraine to get a new president. Asked by Morgan on 14 October whether he would resign, Zelenskyy said he would not: “It’s my responsibility.”
Musk’s post comes as Washington squeezes Kyiv instead of Moscow: Ukraine’s military satellite links slowed, US missile warnings went missing, and the US threatened to cut intelligence unless Kyiv stops hitting Russian refineries.
Zelenskyy said elections could not be held under constant Russian attack: “From the point of security, you can’t do elections.”
Of any future president, he said: “I’m sure the new man or woman will defend our country.” He also reminded Trump that Crimea and parts of Donbas were already occupied when he took office, under another president, long before the full-scale invasion.
“I’m a realist, and I understand that people are more important than one kilometer or two kilometers. It’s not about kilometers. It’s about land and homes,” he told Morgan.
Zelenskyy has said Ukraine is ready for elections if a full 60-day ceasefire is in place. Numerous sources told The Atlantic that Trump sees Zelenskyy as the main obstacle to a peace deal and related business deals with Russia. One Trump adviser said he is also an obstacle to Trump’s hopes for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Ukrainian forces reported restrictions on Starshield, the SpaceX satellite system they use for battlefield communications and drone operations, and Zelenskyy warned the decision would cost lives. On 14 October, Musk said Starshield is owned and controlled by the US government, which sets its limits, and that commercial Starlink cannot be used for offensive military action. Zelenskyy told the FT he did not know whether the decision was SpaceX’s or the US government’s, adding: “I think it’s about SpaceX.” A senior US official told Axios the Trump administration had nothing to do with the restrictions.
On two consecutive nights, air raid alerts in Kyiv sounded only after Russian ballistic missiles were already approaching or striking the capital. Zelenskyy said Ukraine received no warning from partners of the launches on 12 and 13 October, which hit civilian infrastructure and a major power plant. A Ukrainian official told CNN the loss of intelligence “will give Russians a real leverage on a frontline.” A European official questioned Washington’s explanation that weather caused the gaps in missile warnings. Trump denied halting intelligence sharing.
Washington had warned it could suspend intelligence sharing if Ukraine kept striking Russian refineries, Axios reported. A US official disputed that any explicit threat was made. Sources told CNN the US had also threatened to halt European purchases of US weapons for Ukraine. Zelenskyy told the FT the warning came through military channels.
To lower energy costs before next month’s midterm elections, Trump has pressed Kyiv to stop refinery strikes, CNN reported. Zelenskyy said he felt betrayed after Trump announced a diesel supply deal with Russia. On 14 October in London, he told the FT that Ukraine would resume strikes on Russian oil refineries.
Ukrainian officials contacted the White House, CIA, and Pentagon after the restrictions, which Ukraine says affected both Starlink and Starshield, Axios reported on 14 October. A senior US official told Axios the Trump administration had nothing to do with the restrictions. On the same day, Elon Musk said on X that Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government, and that any speed or usage limits are decided by the US military and ultimately the president.
The restrictions could affect Ukraine’s ability to intercept Russian attack drones and carry out mid-range strikes against Russian forces and military targets in occupied Ukrainian territories. A speed cap of 160 km/h was insufficient to intercept some jet-powered drones, an unnamed Ukrainian official told Axios. Ukrainian officials told Axios they suspect SpaceX imposed the restrictions to pressure Kyiv to accept US President Donald Trump’s demand to stop striking Russian oil refineries, though the motive remains unconfirmed. But Starlink does not work inside Russia, and the drones attacking Russian oil facilities use other communications systems, according to Reuters.
Musk did not directly address the throttling, Axios noted. Starlink, he wrote, “is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX,” limited to civilian or defensive use.
White House officials told the Ukrainians they don’t have control over SpaceX, two sources told Axios. One said the administration would reach out to SpaceX to figure out what happened. The White House did not immediately respond to Axios’s request for comment.
Presidential adviser Serhii Beskrestnov said on 14 October that SpaceX had imposed a 160 km/h limit on Starshield’s “military package” overnight without warning. Ukraine’s 7th Rapid Reaction Corps said mid-range strike drones must reach high speed quickly and that an unstable connection “will make it impossible to launch such aircraft or use them as intended.” One unit on the Huliaipole front had to cancel some missions, the corps told Novynarnia.
Ukrainian officials told Axios the system turned off when drones exceeded 160 km/h, and sometimes 80 km/h, before service was partially restored on 14 October. The Defense Ministry said SpaceX continues to restrict Starlink to 160 km/h and that it remains in communication “with partners and SpaceX regarding stable service conditions and the prevention of sudden restrictions,” Axios reported.
The restrictions followed Trump’s 9 October deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin easing sanctions on Russian diesel. A day later, Trump told reporters: “We said you could do whatever you want to Russia, don’t hit the refineries,” the Kyiv Independent reported.
This live blog is now closed, you can read more of our European news coverage here
Just as the leaders sit down at the big table in Brussels, Romania has said that seven people are still missing after a fire on a vessel in Romanian territorial waters of the Black Sea.
Suspected Russian drones have hit several ships off Romania and neighbouring Bulgaria since last week in a spillover from the Ukraine war, AFP reported.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Olivier Matthys/EPA
© Photograph: Olivier Matthys/EPA
© Photograph: Olivier Matthys/EPA
Ukraine will resume strikes on Russian oil refineries, ending a three-day pause it held at Washington’s request, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the Financial Times in an interview published on 15 October. Russia kept bombing Ukraine’s energy system throughout the pause, while Kyiv lost US missile warnings and its Starlink service slowed. Zelenskyy said Ukraine would halt energy strikes again only in exchange for more US air defense.
Ukraine's deep-strike campaign targets the Russian oil industry, which fuels Russia's army in Ukraine and earns the export revenue funding the war. Striking the plants that turn Russian crude into fuel, 12 of them hit in September alone, is one of the few levers Kyiv controls on Moscow’s war income. US President Donald Trump has blamed those strikes for higher US fuel prices, which most analysts attribute to the Iran war, and Washington has threatened to withhold intelligence, and reportedly weapons, unless Kyiv gives it up. Each step Washington takes toward Moscow, from fuel waivers to talk of frozen assets, widens the gap Europe and Ukraine must fill, while Russia gains revenue and time to keep striking.
Zelenskyy said he stopped the refinery strikes for three days to meet US wishes, but Russia kept hitting Ukraine’s energy infrastructure and killing civilians. During the pause, Ukraine received no US warnings of ballistic missile launches, he said. Starlink also slowed across the country, hampering front-line operations and mid-range strikes on Russian military targets, he added.
Russia used those days to fire 39 ballistic missiles and more than 120 drones at Ukraine’s grid overnight into 14 October, leaving at least 600,000 people without power. “We hold energy ceasefire from our side,” Zelenskyy told Piers Morgan on 14 October. Of the Starlink slowdown, he added: “I’m sure that they knew what they did.”
Ukraine could again stop hitting Russian energy only if it receives more US interceptors for its Patriot systems, Zelenskyy told the FT. He warned that a halt could simply invite more US-Russia deals that feed Russia’s war machine, and predicted the next one would involve gas.
US intelligence officials had warned Ukraine’s embassy in Washington that a new strike on Russia’s energy facilities would end all intelligence sharing at once, The Washington Post reported, citing a person familiar with the matter. Washington has not fully cut it off, but the threat stands, the person said. Trump said on 13 October that the US was still sharing intelligence.
A senior US official told Axios the administration had nothing to do with the Starlink limits, which Elon Musk had blamed on the US military. The administration is also considering easing sanctions on shadow fleet tankers, which have carried oil from Russia, Iran, and Venezuela, so the blacklisted vessels could haul non-sanctioned cargo, a US official told Reuters. The US Energy Department said the move would not help Russia ship its oil or fuel.
Washington eased sanctions on Russian oil this spring, after which Russia’s oil income jumped $890 million in a week, and it extended that waiver despite telling allies it would not. US envoys also proposed unfreezing part of Russia’s frozen assets to lure Moscow back to talks, an idea European officials rejected, the Financial Times reported.
«L’uomo più ricco del mondo disprezza la beneficenza» scrive L’Economist, che alla questione dedica un approfondimento. Una conclusione condivisibile, se si spulciano i (pochi) documenti disponibili, come hanno fatto il settimanale britannico, e prima ancora il New York Times e Bloomberg.
L’uomo più ricco del mondo, cioè Elon Musk, nonostante ciò, è a capo di una delle più grandi fondazioni benefiche d’America, e quindi del mondo. Per la precisione, la quinta. Secondo i dati più aggiornati, con un patrimonio di 14,7 miliardi di dollari, la Musk Foundation è oggi di poco più piccola della Ford Foundation e il doppio per fondi disponibili della Rockefeller Foundation, ma anche nel 2023, ma anche nel 2023, quando disponeva di “solo” 9,5 miliardi di dollari (il trentacinque per cento in meno rispetto a oggi), era già più grande di altre organizzazioni filantropiche familiari con decenni di storia alle spalle, tra cui la stessa Rockefeller Foundation, la MacArthur Foundation o la Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Musk ha spesso sostenuto che il suo contributo all’umanità non è nelle opere di bene, ma nelle auto elettriche di Tesla che non inquinano, nei satelliti di Starlink che permettono di comunicare più facilmente, nel dibattito politico garantito dal social X. Ritiene la filantropia «una sciocchezza», tempo fa dichiarò al podcast WTF che «è molto difficile donare denaro per fare realmente del bene», e da responsabile di Doge (la commissione per l’efficienza governativa che gli era stata affidata da Donald Trump) ha contribuito pesantemente a smantellare in quattro e quattr’otto UsAid, l’agenzia governativa fondata da John F. Kennedy nel 1961. Più di recente, il padrone di SpaceX non ha avuto remore a commentare con un «purtroppo, sì» la notizia secondo cui MacKenzie Scott, l’ex moglie di Jeff Bezos, ha donato dal 2019 in poi oltre ventisei miliardi di dollari a migliaia di associazioni.
La contraddizione in termini è evidente, ma non tiene conto della legislazione americana in materia di donazioni e dell’uso improprio che ne fa Elon Musk. Come gran parte dei ricchi d’Oltreoceano, pianifica le sue elargizioni in modo da pagare meno tasse, ma in più – a differenza di molti di loro – la grande parte delle somme donate dalla sua fondazione va ad altre organizzazioni in qualche modo legate ai suoi interessi imprenditoriali.
«Le donazioni più ingenti – scrive l’Economist – per circa otto miliardi di dollari in azioni Tesla, sono andate alla sua fondazione nel 2021 e nel 2022, anni in cui ha ceduto quote azionarie per miliardi di dollari e si è trovato a dover pagare maggiori tasse». L’imposta sulle plusvalenze (cioè la differenza del valore iniziale dell’azione e quello al momento della vendita) può essere ammortizzata se parte della somma viene destinata in beneficenza, richiedendo una detrazione fiscale che viene calcolata sul valore di mercato del titolo, non su quello al momento dell’acquisto. Risultato: «Alla fine del 2024, il valore contabile delle azioni detenute dalla Fondazione Musk era di circa 5,7 milioni di dollari, mentre il loro valore di mercato era stimato in quattordici miliardi di dollari».
Qui la capacità interpretativa delle leggi americane si fa ancora più sapiente. In cambio delle agevolazioni fiscali, i filantropi si impegnano a distribuire ogni anno il cinque per cento del patrimonio, per non incorrere in sanzioni ma con una tolleranza di un altro anno in cui recuperare eventuali mancate donazioni. Ecco, secondo il New York Times, la Fondazione Musk ne ha usufruito per quattro anni consecutivi, quelli per cui è disponibile la documentazione: a fine 2024 risulterebbe un debito di quattrocento milioni di dollari.
E non è finita qui. In base alle dichiarazioni fiscali e le stime di Candid Platform, che raccoglie e analizza dati sulle no profit americane, oltre un decimo del miliardo di dollari donato tra il 2020 e il 2024 dalla Musk Foundation sarebbe andato a Fidelity Charitable e Vanguard Charitable che gestiscono i cosiddetti DAF. Che cosa sono? Intermediari che consentono di beneficiare delle agevolazioni fiscali prima ancora che le donazioni siano davvero operative. Insomma, delle scatole cinesi della beneficenza.
Non è facile entrare in contatto con la fondazione, secondo Inside Philantropy non prende in considerazione chi si propone per essere finanziato, «pertanto, attirare la sua attenzione risulta difficile senza un legame personale con un membro della famiglia o senza acquisire visibilità all’interno delle reti in cui già fluiscono le erogazioni della Musk Foundation». Anche perché, al contrario delle altre istituzioni filantropiche che hanno decine di dipendenti, è gestita da un team di sole tre persone, che le dedicano in media due ore a settimana ciascuno: Musk; il capo del suo family office, Jared Birchall e una sua assistente, Matilda Simon.
Quel che si sa è tutto nelle dichiarazioni dei redditi, in particolare in quella del 2024, l’ultima disponibile. Il cinquantotto per cento dei fondi donati, secondo gli esperti consultati da Bloomberg e poi dall’Economist, è stato destinato a The Foundation, un altro ente benefico guidato dallo stesso Birchall, che condivide lo stesso indirizzo della Fondazione Musk e non dispone neppure di un suo sito web. The Foundation si propone di costruire scuole dedicate all’istruzione STEM. Musk ha finanziato una scuola privata chiamata Ad Astra, vicino alla precedente sede di SpaceX in California, con meno di cinquanta alunni, compresi i suoi figli. La scuola è stata poi chiusa, ed è in programma la realizzazione di un nuovo edificio, stavolta in Texas dove SpaceX ha trasferito l’immenso quartier generale.
Una delle donazioni più consistenti, ben cinquantacinque milioni di dollari risale al 2021, ed era destinata a un ospedale pediatrico per la cui raccolta fondi si era speso Jared Isaacman, il miliardario che ha poi finanziato una missione di SpaceX, a cui ha anche partecipato, prima di essere nominato da Trump a capo della Nasa. Donazioni minori hanno riguardato alcune non profit legate alla zona di Boca Chica, in Texas, dove erano precipitati i detriti del razzo Starship SN11 esploso in volo nel 2021, mentre 2,1 milioni di dollari sono finiti allo Scroll Prize, la competizione che si prefigge di decifrare i papiri di Ercolano carbonizzati dall’eruzione del Vesuvio, vinta anche dall’ingegnere Luke Farritor, uno dei cosiddetti “ragazzi del DOGE”. Tutto legale, beninteso, non sempre etico.
Molti più soldi Elon Musk sembra più propenso a voler destinare alle cause politiche. Da luglio a oggi ha dirottato 276 milioni di dollari verso gruppi vicini ai repubblicani, e di questi centocinquantotto milioni al Senate Leadership Fund, il principale super PAC che sostiene i candidati del partito al Senato. Questo fa dell’uomo più ricco del mondo anche il maggior donatore in vista delle elezioni di midterm. La sua attenzione è rivolta alla regolamentazione dell’intelligenza artificiale (era seduto accanto a Trump il 29 settembre in occasione del White House Accord on Super Intelligence) e al sostegno di Ken Paxton in Texas. Qui è arrivato a retribuire tremila attivisti per affiggere volantini casa per casa. Soldi veri, in questo caso. E tanti.
L'articolo Musk è l’uomo più ricco del mondo, e anche il più tirchio proviene da Linkiesta.it.
© BETTY LAURA ZAPATA / POOL/EPA
SpaceX chief Elon Musk says the version of Starlink that Ukraine’s military uses, StarShield, is owned and controlled by the US government rather than by his company. His claims come amid a storm over Ukrainian reports that a speed cut had broken their frontline operations.
Ukraine’s drones and air defenses rely on Starlink to steer and strike, so a limit on the network hits combat directly. Ukrainian troops reported that overnight into 14 October, the faster military package they depend on was throttled, halting a series of missions. Musk’s answer shifts the decision and the blame from SpaceX to the US government and, ultimately, to the president.
“Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS. StarShield systems are owned and controlled by the US government,” Musk says.
He draws a line between the two services. Ordinary Starlink is a commercial product owned by SpaceX, limited to civilian or defensive use and not for offensive military action, which he called inappropriate for a commercial company.
Their conversation took place the same week that Washington pressured Kyiv over its strikes on Russian oil refineries amid US President Donald Trump's diesel deal with Moscow.
The statement followed a direct appeal. Former Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov told Musk on X that Starlink connectivity at speeds of up to 160 km/h was being restored, and pressed for more.
“Removing StarShield’s speed limit entirely is now critical for Ukraine’s defense. Thank you, Elon Musk. We hope for your continued support,” Fedorov wrote, framing the cap as a direct constraint on the war.
The ordinary Starlink Mini mounted on drones is capped at about 160 km/h, which is too slow for some missions, so faster flight requires access to the military version, StarShield, Ukrainska Pravda notes. Ukraine has used StarShield since 2024.
Throttling of mobile internet system will affect Kyiv’s air defences more than its strikes on oil refineries. Now Zelenskyy must be hoping that US intel holds
In Ukraine the situation was already jittery enough. Donald Trump has been inventing ceasefires and buying Russian diesel to shore up his flagging popularity, while a sinister new wave of faster, jet-powered drones are breaking through Kyiv’s stretched air defences. Casualties are rising as the weather turns.
Overnight, Russia bombed three power plants that supply Kyiv, aiming to cut off heating and electricity to the city. According to the president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, for a second night in a row no warning came from Ukraine’s western allies of the incoming ballistic missiles – and so no air raid alert was issued.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP
© Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP
© Photograph: Evgeniy Maloletka/AP
The Ukrainian government on Tuesday night said that its access to the SpaceX-owned Starlink satellite internet service was throttled, prompting critics to question the wisdom of depending on any company owned by far-right billionaire Elon Musk. According to a Wednesday report in The New York Times, Ukrainian officials suspect that orders to restrict their access […]
The post Throttling Ukraine’s Starlink access heightens concerns over Musk appeared first on Asia Times.
US Senator Richard Blumenthal, a co-author of the Russia sanctions law named after Lindsey Graham, has issued a sharp statement on the latest developments in Ukraine. He says that President Donald Trump and SpaceX chief Elon Musk should be held accountable for reported Starlink failures that could cripple Ukraine’s defense.
On 14 October, Ukraine’s military reported a Starlink disruption that halted its operations. It happened at the same time the country’s air defense stopped receiving intelligence on a Russian ballistic strike that killed three people in Kyiv. Both failures came right after the US struck a diesel deal with Russia, letting low volumes of fuel into global markets and America while pressure grew on Ukraine to stop hitting the Russian oil refineries that raise the cost of the war.
"Reports of Starlink failing in Ukraine are deeply alarming— potentially crippling air defense against Russia’s murderous missiles & drones. Trump & Musk must be held accountable," he says.
The alarm rests on how completely Ukraine leans on the system. SpaceX has reportedly throttled the StarShield military package Ukrainian drones use, with connections dropping once the drones move at speed, and breaking a series of missions.
Ukraine neither owns nor controls Starlink, and the latest limits revived long-running fears that its battlefield lifeline can be dialed down from outside the country.
Blumenthal’s demand sits inside a broader revolt in Congress. A bipartisan group of 12 senators wrote Trump on 13 October urging him to rescind his deal letting Russian diesel back to market, calling the Treasury’s General License No. 135 a gift to Moscow that should be withdrawn.
They pressed him instead to use the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act he signed in September to squeeze Russia and its enablers, above all, China.
"If there's one lesson from Trump's mindless warmongering, it's that we need to break our dependence on foreign imports of fossil fuels & embrace alternate sources of energy," he said.
Poland’s Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski has publicly criticized SpaceX chief Elon Musk over the latest disruptions in Starlink's operation in Ukraine. Poland is the largest supplier of Ukraine’s terminals, having provided about 29,500, roughly half the network. It also has a Starlink ground station in Wola Krobowska that provides connectivity for much of Central and Eastern Europe, including Ukraine, RMF24 reports.
On 13 October, SpaceX imposed a 100 mph (160 km/h) speed limit on the StarShield military package that Ukrainian forces use, disrupting drone missions without warning. Poland, which pays about $50 million a year for Ukraine’s Starlink terminals, told Musk it is watching.
“Hey, @elonmusk, big man, are you playing politics with your products again? As your European customers, we are watching you,” Sikorski wrote on X.
The “big man” jab echoed their 2025 clash, when Musk told Sikorski to “be quiet, small man” after the minister noted that Warsaw, not SpaceX as charity, pays for the service.
Be quiet, small man.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 9, 2025
You pay a tiny fraction of the cost.
And there is no substitute for Starlink.
Meanwhile, presidential adviser Serhii “Flash” Beskrestnov said that this could not be a coincidence and was most likely tied to the current political situation.
The cap bites exactly where Ukraine’s drones do their work. The StarShield package had previously carried no data speed limit, and the change directly affected drones that use Starlink to steer in flight, the 7th Air Assault Corps said.
“During flights, the connection could drop for 10 to 20 seconds at speeds of just 110 to 120 kilometers per hour. The drones kept moving, but these interruptions made them harder to control,” the corps said, describing problems that now start well below the new ceiling.
A dependence Kyiv has feared for years. The limit revives an old worry. Ukraine neither owns nor controls Starlink, and the restriction follows fresh fears of a shutdown after Musk backed US President Donald Trump’s call for Zelenskyy to resign.
Jean-Noël Barrot criticises X owner in speech attacking foreign efforts to destabilise France before 2027 election
France’s foreign minister has accused Elon Musk of using his social media platform to orchestrate “massive online harassment campaigns” against European leaders as he took aim at foreign efforts to destabilise the country before next year’s presidential election.
Speaking at an Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development conference on Tuesday, Jean-Noël Barrot pointed to the role that social media had come to play in the global battle over democracy. “The forces seeking to undermine democracy now dominate the information landscape, where they employ tactics designed to polarise public debate,” he said.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
© Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
© Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
Launch of Russian ballistic missiles on Ukraine, with no US warning, coincides with outage of Starlink managed by Musk’s SpaceX
Ukraine’s military has suddenly had its access to Starlink satellite internet terminals restricted as the Trump administration has increased pressure on Ukraine to halt long-range strikes on Russia’s oil industry immediately.
The terminals, which are produced by Elon Musk’s SpaceX but managed by the US government, are a key component of Ukraine’s military operations and the sudden restrictions on the terminals travelling at high speeds on Tuesday evening led to the failure of several combat missions, said an adviser on military technology to Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Reuters
© Photograph: Reuters
© Photograph: Reuters
Login