Per fare esordire a nemmeno 16 anni quello che sarebbe diventato il calciatore più rilevante di sempre, serviva un compagno che si fermasse negli spogliatoi dopo aver giocato i primi 45 minuti di Argentinos Juniors–Talleres de Córdoba. L’allenatore Juan Carlos Montes mise dentro Diego Armando Maradona per Rubén Anibal Giacobetti. Successe il 20 ottobre 1976, un mercoledì pomeriggio di cinquant’anni fa. Giacobetti allora aveva 20 anni, era anche lui un prodotto del settore giovanile dell’Argentinos Juniors e uscendo dal campo entrò involontariamente nella storia del calcio. Giocò ancora qualche stagione in Argentina, prima di un passaggio nel campionato americano e di una stagione non memorabile in Italia, dove disputò un torneo nella Serie D sarda. Tornato a Buenos Aires, aprì un’agenzia immobiliare, dove tuttora lavora.

Giacobetti, che ricordi ha di quella giornata?
Per me il ricordo si è trasformato nel tempo. Quel giorno in cui debuttò Diego io uscii nell’intervallo e ovviamente non ero felice, a nessuno piace essere sostituito. Ma con il tempo è diventato un pensiero meraviglioso che il calcio ha dato a un appassionato come me.

Lei aveva debuttato qualche mese prima a 19 anni, ma Maradona ne aveva quattro anni in meno.
La gente già conosceva Diego e andava a vederlo negli allenamenti settimanali sapendo che da un momento all’altro avrebbe debuttato, ed è toccato proprio quel giorno. La mia rabbia non era per lui, ma per il fatto di dover uscire. Poi sono andato in tribuna e mi sono visto quel debutto.

Si arrabbiò con l’allenatore?
Tieni conto che quando c’è un cambio del genere, a rimetterci è sempre il più giovane, e in quel momento in campo il più giovane ero io. Credo di sì, che quella fosse la decisione che doveva prendere. Nessuno si sarebbe preoccupato perché avevo giocato poche partite, non ero una figura chiave della squadra e tutti stavano aspettando che debuttasse quel ragazzo di 15 anni.

Giocavate nello stesso ruolo?
Io e Diego non giocavamo nello stesso ruolo. Io sono sempre stato un “numero cinque”, un centrocampista centrale. Ma quel giorno giocai come centrocampista di sinistra, proprio il ruolo di Diego, per coprire un po’ il centrocampo visto che quello del Talleres de Cordoba che era forte. L’idea era di essere più difensivi e non avere in campo un altro centrocampista d’attacco. Il tecnico fece una formazione abbastanza difensiva e così io mi spostai a sinistra. Quindi quel giorno sarebbe toccato comunque a me uscire per via della posizione. Nel secondo tempo l’Argentinos Juniors, giocando in casa, doveva vincere e nel primo tempo non avevamo creato molto, l’ingresso di Diego era logico.

Ha avuto la fortuna di giocare ancora con Diego?
Ho giocato circa 30 partite in prima squadra con l’Argentinos Juniors e circa 20 al fianco di Diego, spesso io con il numero cinque e lui con il dieci.

Qual è stata la primissima volta che ha visto Maradona e cosa ha pensato?
Quando giocavo nelle giovanili, il nostro allenatore ci raccomandò di andare a vedere “Los Cebollitas”, la squadra dei ragazzi di 13 anni dove giocava Diego. Noi pensavamo che tutti quei ragazzini sarebbero arrivati in prima squadra perché erano dei fenomeni, ma Diego spiccava su tutti. Vinsero il campionato ed erano famosi in quella categoria. Ma di quella formazione praticamente solo Diego è arrivato in prima squadra. Quella fu la prima volta che vedemmo quel piccoletto scuro di pelle distinguersi così: sembrava andasse sui pattini e ubriacava tutti. Diego non ha mai perso quelle abilità fino al debutto in prima squadra. Quando lo aggregarono agli allenamenti, i giocatori più anziani rimanevano sorpresi e chiedevano al tecnico di farlo giocare. Si allenò pochissimo con noi, due o tre settimane, e alla fine debuttò. Era chiaro che sarebbe diventato il più forte di tutti: io dicevo a mio padre che c’era un ragazzo che era un fenomeno meraviglioso.

E lui cosa rispondeva?
Che di giocatori così poi non ne arriva nessuno, ricordando al contrario i veri fenomeni come Di Stefano o Sívori. Invece giocò bene, lo comprò il Boca, poi andò al Barcellona e iniziò quella straordinaria carriera. Noi già negli allenamenti ci rendevamo conto che era diverso. Faceva cose che noi avremmo potuto provare mattina, pomeriggio e sera senza mai riuscirci. Faceva cose impossibili, aveva un guanto al posto del piede. A meno di un grave infortunio, le sue qualità erano quelle di un fuoriclasse.

Ve lo siete goduto, insomma.
Certo. Ci sfidava a calciare i calci d’angoli sul secondo palo e a colpirne l’incrocio. Lui andava e colpiva l’incrocio, mentre noi la mandavamo alta o di lato. Lì capivi che era diverso, come quando a scuola hai seduto vicino a te un futuro Premio Nobel. Vedevi che era un genio che sapeva tutto, anche se poi non puoi essere mai sicuro di quello che sarebbe diventato nel mondo.

Com’era la vostra squadra?
All’Argentinos Juniors era tutto molto povero. Era una squadra da metà classifica in giù. All’epoca si sentiva molto il divario con i grandi club come River, Boca, Racing o Independiente. Era una buona squadra per i suoi standard, ma cercava soprattutto di non retrocedere. Ciò che ottenne Diego da quel momento in poi fu non solo far lottare la squadra per i primi posti, ma dare vera importanza alle giovanili. Prima i giocatori uscivano per necessità e non per un lavoro strutturato. Dopo che Diego se ne andò, il club iniziò a generare tantissimi giocatori, ed è per questo che oggi l’Argentinos Juniors è chiamato “il vivaio del mondo”. Un altro Diego non è stato possibile tirarlo fuori, ma comunque sono usciti fuori giocatori da Nazionale come Batista, Sorín, Redondo. Si resero conto che bisognava puntare sul settore giovanile. La genetica fa sì che un giocatore del genere nasca ogni tanto, non è semplice. L’Argentina c’è riuscita poi con Messi, è una bacchetta magica che fa uscire un talento ogni tanto.

Quale è stato il contatto per il trasferimento in Italia?
Nel 1980 sono andato negli Stati Uniti, a Rochester, nel 1981 sono tornato nella provincia de La Pampa. E nel 1982 con Oscar Nichiarelli in Belgio, portati dall’intermediario José Rubulotta. Non siamo rimasti, lì ci hanno chiamato dalla Sicilia e siamo andati a fare un provino. Durante il Mondiale dell’82 abbiamo conosciuto una persona che ci ha portato a Trapani, ma poi ci hanno fatto il contratto per la Sardegna. A Sennori ho giocato una stagione. A 28 anni ho lasciato il calcio, sono tornato qui e ho aperto l’agenzia immobiliare.

Le è piaciuto giocare in Italia o no?
Non mi è piaciuto granché. Avevo già un’età, bisognava aspettare per poter passare di categoria. Quindi ho giocato una stagione, sempre da centrocampista centrale, e sono tornato. Ricordo che come allenatore di una squadra avversaria c’era uno famoso, il brasiliano Amarildo.

Si è ritirato giovane dal calcio, ha qualche rimpianto? Sente che avrebbe potuto ottenere di più con il pallone?
Probabilmente sì, ma questi sono i destini di ciascuno. Era un’epoca più difficile senza procuratori che ti costruissero la carriera. Mi sarebbe piaciuto giocare fino a 34 o 35 anni e vivere di calcio, ma la passione di aver giocato e la fortuna di essere stato al fianco di Diego è stato un sogno.

Chi era il suo idolo quando era piccolo?
Da piccolo ero tifoso del River Plate. Mi piacevano Amadeo Carrizo, Beto Alonso e Bochini, ma Diego è stato superiore a tutti. Nel mio ruolo mi è sempre piaciuto Fernando Redondo, un volante squisito.

Quante volte vi siete rivisti e parlati con Diego dopo quel 20 ottobre?
Nel 1978 me ne andai dall’Argentinos Juniors e nel 1982 è stata l’ultima volta che l’ho visto. Io ero in Spagna per il Mondiale ’82 a cercare squadra e siamo andati con l’altro ragazzo argentino nel ritiro della Nazionale argentina a Villajoyosa. Diego ci fece entrare.

Cosa le disse Diego?
Diego si ricordava perfettamente di tutto. Chiedemmo se c’era possibilità di entrare per salutarlo e Diego ci fece subito passare.

Quando Diego è morto, per lei è stato un duro colpo?
Sì, ho provato molta tristezza vedendo come lo esponevano quando allenava il Gimnasia. Si stavano approfittando di una persona malata, il finale è stato molto triste.

Ha una foto con lui?
Qui in ufficio no, ma a casa mia ne ho una con Diego nel ritiro di Ezeiza.

L'articolo Rubén Giacobetti, l’uomo che 50 anni fa uscì per far debuttare Maradona: “Tutti aspettavano quel ragazzo, era come avere avere accanto un futuro Premio Nobel” proviene da Il Fatto Quotidiano.

The complaint alleges excessive force during an October 16 university protest in Buenos Aires, where at least 550 people required medical attention.

Argentina’s Provincial Commission for Memory (CPM) has filed a criminal complaint against President Javier Milei’s government and security officials over a police crackdown on a university protest in Buenos Aires that left at least 550 people requiring medical attention. The filing accuses security forces of abuse of authority, dereliction of official duties and other crimes.

RELATED: Argentina Abstains on UN Colonialism Vote Despite Malvinas Rhetoric

The complaint concerns the October 16 Federal University March and a demonstration against Decree of Necessity and Urgency (DNU) 70 in Plaza del Congreso. It names the Unified National Security Command and authorities in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, alleging that the security operation exceeded legal limits.

The operation involved the Federal Police, Naval Prefecture, National Gendarmerie, Airport Security Police and Buenos Aires City Police. According to the CPM, officers intervened while the mass demonstration was underway, forcing university leaders to interrupt their reading of the main statement from the stage.

The commission reported that officers fired rubber bullets directly at protesters’ faces and heads and used water-cannon trucks against demonstrators. At least 550 people required medical attention, and at least 120 tear-gas grenades were fired, according to the organization.

Ver esta publicación en Instagram

Una publicación compartida por teleSUR English (@telesurenglish)

Journalists and human rights monitors injured

A CPM report documented injuries to 50 media workers and 15 members of the commission, which is chaired by Adolfo Pérez Esquivel and Dora Barrancos.

Among those injured were Página/12 photographer Guido Piotrkowski, who was struck twice in the chest by rubber bullets, and TeleSISA journalist Laura Quispe, who sustained nine rubber-bullet impacts.

Footage circulated by the Center for Legal and Social Studies (CELS) showed officers aiming at protesters’ eyes. Later that evening, television cameras recorded Gendarmerie officers collecting spent cartridges from the streets and placing them in bags. The CPM raised concerns about the preservation of potential evidence.

Six people arrested during the demonstration

Six people were arrested during the protest and its dispersal. Two students from Nicolás Avellaneda School were detained at 5:11 p.m. at the intersection of Montevideo and Sarmiento streets.

One student, aged 14, was held for two hours. The other, aged 17, was charged with resisting authority and faces criminal proceedings under the recently introduced juvenile justice regime.

Police later arrested four adults — three men and one woman — at the intersection of Chacabuco Street and Avenida de Mayo. Human rights organizations said the woman, a student at the National University of Tres de Febrero, was stopped because she was carrying a Colombian flag. All four were charged with resisting authority.

Commission seeks records and independent investigation

The CPM’s complaint alleges that the actions of officers and their political superiors were coordinated and carried out under orders from senior officials who knowingly authorized the use of coercion outside the legal framework and in violation of Argentina’s international commitments.

The commission has asked the national and Buenos Aires city security ministries to provide a complete list of personnel deployed during the operation, details of the vehicles, weapons and equipment used, and copies of orders transmitted over police radio frequencies.

It is also seeking information about officers who photographed or filmed protesters, including whether they had prior judicial authorization, as well as footage from the city’s surveillance cameras.

The CPM has called for independent forensic examinations and for the collection, custody and analysis of testimony, commercial recordings and other evidence to remain under the control of the competent court or prosecutor. The request specifically excludes the security forces implicated in the events from handling that evidence.

Federal forces in Argentina fired tear gas and turned water cannons on thousands of peaceful demonstrators in Buenos Aires on Thursday, detaining at least 34 people during the fifth Federal University March.

The march demanded implementation of the University Financing Law and denounced a sustained squeeze on public university budgets.

The demonstrations were replicated in dozens of Argentine cities, with students, teachers and university staff joined by unions, social organizations and environmental groups demanding the full implementation of the University Financing Law.

RELATED: Argentina’s Basic Basket Costs Outpace Inflation as Poverty Line Climbs

Protesters also denounced a sustained budget squeeze on public universities and rejected the ninth consecutive appeal filed by Javier Milei’s administration against court rulings that order the transfer of funds to the country’s higher education institutions.

The funding dispute has dragged on for months. Courts have repeatedly instructed the government to hand over the money set aside under the University Financing Law, and each ruling has been met with a new appeal from the national government. Thursday’s march was the fifth federal mobilization in a campaign that has grown beyond campuses to include unions, social organizations and environmental groups.

Ver esta publicación en Instagram

Una publicación compartida de teleSUR English (@telesurenglish)

Beyond the university budget, the crowd voiced opposition to Decree 70/23 and defended the Land Law. Speakers also called for salary increases, relief measures for indebted families and more resources for public institutions.

Arrests and Attacks on Press

According to local media, the police began repression outside the National Congress in Buenos Aires as a response to an incident of a group of about eight people, who started breaking street furniture and throwing objects against the fence surrounding Parliament. Despite being an isolated incident, the gassing affected those who marched peacefully. Witnesses warned of possible infiltrators.

At least 34 people were arrested and one woman was injured. Cameras captured a gas canister hitting her head. “The gas thing fell on my head, I don’t know how I am, I have to go to the hospital,” the woman, who gave her name as Andrea, told reporters covering the march.

For its part, the Buenos Aires City Police said in an official statement that its own force detained six people: two minors, aged 14 and 17, and four adults, three men and one woman, charged with assault and resistance to authority.

Press workers also was targeted. Photographer Guido Piotrkowski, who was covering the march, captured the moment when a Federal Police officer stepped out from behind the fence, aimed and fired at him. “They came out from behind the fences and started shooting; I was taking photos and they fired at us,” he said. “They hit me in the chest, another colleague in the leg, but they aimed directly. They were rubber pellets.”

According to the reports, another worker from a community media outlet had to be treated at a hospital after being hit by at least seven rubber bullets. Cameras from the C5N channel also recorded a man with his face covered handling a backpack in the middle of the square. When the reporter approached to speak with him, the man reacted violently and struck the cameraman.

The fifth Federal University March ended under a cloud of gas. The political dispute over who unleashed the violence now moves to Congress, where opposition lawmakers are pressing the security minister to account for the operation.

No Quorum in Congress

Meanwhile, the Chamber of Deputies failed in its attempt to debate the rejection of the Decree of Necessity and Urgency 70/23, promoted by the government of Javier Milei to support its program, by failing to reach the necessary quorum at the special session convened by opposing parties. Only 121 legislators attended the legislative day, eight fewer than the 129 required to enable treatment in the compound, with a total of 136 absences.

The opposition call gained momentum following an initial ruling by the Supreme Court of Justice that deregulated the sale of land to foreigners under the Decree 70/23, although a subsequent decision by the court itself temporarily restored the rule, argument that they used allied sectors to avoid attending the session. In parallel, the Government negotiated to include a cap on land sales to foreigners in the Inviolability of Private Property project, which was scheduled for debate on October 21.

The fifth Federal University March is taking place this Thursday, October 15, across Argentina. Participants are mobilizing toward the National Congress to demand compliance with the University Financing Law (No. 27.795), the restoration of salaries for both academic and non-academic staff, and the definitive rejection of the Javier Milei administration’s Emergency Decree (DNU) 70/23.

RELATED:

Argentina’s Basic Basket Costs Outpace Inflation as Poverty Line Climbs

Under the slogan Without funding, there is no science or education, the university community is calling for the immediate implementation of regulations that mandate the adjustment of operating funds, salaries, and scholarships in line with inflation. The protest was organized by the National Interuniversity Council (CIN), the Argentine University Federation (FUA), and the National Universities Trade Union Front.

Organizers report that academic and non-academic staff have seen their purchasing power decline by more than 32 percent so far this year. This action follows a judicial ruling that upheld injunctions and imposed financial penalties on the national government for failing to adjust funds and wages as required by law.

In the City of Buenos Aires, the main contingent—led by the University of Buenos Aires (UBA)—will gather at 1:00 p.m. at Plaza Houssay (at the intersection of Córdoba and Junín streets). Labor unions and social movements will begin assembling at 1:30 p.m. in the vicinity of the National Congress.

At 2:00 p.m., the march will proceed along Avenida Córdoba to Callao, then continue via Corrientes and Cerrito toward the parliamentary district. At 4:00 p.m., a joint statement from rectors, students, and labor unions will be read at Plaza del Congreso.

The text reads, “[NOW] Students took over the Faculty of Social Sciences ahead of the Fifth Federal University March.”

The protest coincides with a debate in the Chamber of Deputies regarding Emergency Decree (DNU) 70/23—a measure that has already been rejected by the Senate. The organizing groups aim to exert pressure to ensure the Lower House rejects the measure definitively.

The decree—viewed by the organizers as a cornerstone of the government’s ultraliberal agenda—impacts numerous sectors beyond education. Although the Supreme Court reversed its position, leaving the Land Law in effect following legal back-and-forth regarding its Article 154, universities have maintained their call to action due to the broad scope of the regulation.

Consequently, the day’s events bring together social, labor, political, and student organizations. The initiative also has the backing of the CGT, both branches of the CTA, ATE, and various scientific organizations—representing a coalition of workers and students united in defense of public education.

The protest movement spans the entire country. In Córdoba, the National University has suspended classes and is holding a march through the city center. In Santa Fe and Rosario, demonstrations are planned in response to disruptions in institutional operations, scholarship programs, and research activities. Higher education institutions across all provinces are staging strikes and protests.

This mobilization follows a series of strikes, open-air classes, and awareness-raising events. The organizers maintain that the implementation of Law 27.795 is essential to guarantee the continued operation of universities, sustain scientific research, and restore wages within the education sector.

The trip from the village of Iruya, in northwestern Argentina, to Buenos Aires Province can take several days. “The truck carrying fresh produce takes between 24 and 35 hours to arrive,” says Raúl Viveros, a member of the community Kolla Colanzulí of Finca Santiago. That is the effort required for the country’s largest market to sell the small potato-like tubers known as papines, which have a unique flavor and are produced by the first indigenous community to have been recognized by the state of Argentina.

Seguir leyendo

On Tuesday, Argentine political leaders, workers, students, and social activists will march to the Congress in Buenos Aires to demand compliance with the University Financing Law and urge the Chamber of Deputies to reject Decree of Necessity and Urgency (DNU) 70/23. The gathering is scheduled to take place in front of Parliament, where demands regarding the Land Law and the Rental Law will also be voiced.

RELATED:

Argentine Prosecutors Seek Up to 12 Years in Prison for Doctors Over Maradona’s Death

The mobilization will bring together faculty, non-teaching staff, students, university officials, labor confederations, tenants’ organizations, Malvinas war veterans, and political leaders. Participants will call on the government to implement the University Financing Law and on the Chamber of Deputies to repeal DNU 70/23, which has already been rejected by the Senate.

The protest was decided upon weeks ago, following strikes and public teaching sessions organized by faculty and non-teaching staff unions. The organizations maintain that the law must guarantee the sustainability of national universities and demand that the Executive branch comply with existing regulations.

The Buenos Aires University (UBA) issued a message supporting the call to action: “Let us not normalize non-compliance with the law. Laws must be obeyed. Always.” The university called for participation in the fifth Federal University March to demand adherence to the law and to defend public higher education.

These demands were also voiced last week at the Palacio Pizzurno, the headquarters of the Secretariat of Education. There, student unions from the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area staged a sit-in and asked the Secretary of Education, Carlos Torrendell, to increase scholarships in accordance with the University Financing Law.

According to the statement regarding the event, the meeting lasted three minutes before authorities forcibly removed the students from the building. Later, the Ministry of Human Capital announced it would file a formal complaint regarding the incident. Buenos Aires Province Governor Axel Kicillof confirmed he would participate in the march.

During an event marking the 150th anniversary of the implementation of Law 988 on Common Education, he stated that the national government does not respect the law and maintained that its representatives would be “in the streets on the 15th, defending public universities.” Kicillof also noted that the 26 national universities located within the province are the responsibility of the federal government.

Meanwhile, students will march in groups organized by student unions or independently, just as they did during the four previous mobilizations. Some university faculties are preparing measures to support the protest. At the UBA’s Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, an assembly voted to occupy the building at Puan 480 from 7:00 PM on Tuesday until Thursday, the day of the mobilization.

Emergency Decree (DNU) 70/23 and the legislative debate

The march also aims to pressure the Chamber of Deputies to reject Emergency Decree (DNU) 70/23, signed by President Javier Milei. The lower house is scheduled to debate the decree, although achieving a quorum to hold the session remains uncertain.

The legislative debate was called after the Supreme Court overturned a ruling that had declared Article 154 of the decree—which concerned the repeal of the Land Law—unconstitutional. As of this writing, that law remains in effect. Nevertheless, the organizers are proceeding with the mobilization, maintaining that the protest should not depend on judicial decisions.

The La Plata Center for Malvinas War Veterans (Cecim), which had filed the legal challenge, confirmed it would be present at Plaza de los Dos Congresos, stating: “The homeland is not for sale. We are marching on the 15th regardless, because DNU 70 is a crime against the people.”

The two CTA labor confederations also announced their participation. The CTA Autónoma announced it would return to the streets to demand that the Chamber of Deputies repeal the decree and move forward with declaring it unconstitutional.

Emergency Decree (DNU) 70/23 repealed the Rental Law, which had mandated three-year contracts and six-monthly rent adjustments. Consequently, tenants’ organizations will join the march to demand the decree’s rejection. The group Organized Tenants (Inquilinos Agrupados) called for a gathering outside Congress, declaring: “Down with Decree 70. We will have a rental law.”

Peronist and leftist leaders also confirmed their participation. Gabriel Solano—a former Buenos Aires City legislator representing the Workers’ Party (Partido Obrero) within the Left and Workers’ Front-Unity (FIT-U)—called for intensified mobilization to reject the decree and secure an increase in the university budget.

The rally will thus bring together demands for higher education funding and opposition to the repeals enacted by the decree regarding land and rental regulations. The outcome of the debate on the decree will rest with the deputies, while protesters seek to voice their grievances outside Congress.

A Promotoria que atua no julgamento da morte de Diego Maradona afirmou nesta quinta-feira (8) que o atendimento médico prestado ao ex-jogador em seus últimos dias de vida foi marcado por desorganização e falhas graves. Para os acusadores, a equipe responsável pelo tratamento colocou o ídolo argentino em uma situação de abandono e não cumpriu medidas consideradas necessárias para preservar sua vida.

Durante a apresentação dos argumentos finais, o promotor Patricio Ferrari classificou a internação domiciliar como uma operação caótica. Segundo ele, os profissionais envolvidos deixaram de cumprir obrigações médicas e adotaram condutas incompatíveis com o quadro de um paciente considerado vulnerável e complexo.

Sete profissionais de saúde são julgados no processo, entre eles médicos, uma psiquiatra, um psicólogo e um enfermeiro. Eles são acusados de homicídio com dolo eventual, modalidade em que a acusação sustenta que os envolvidos tinham consciência de que suas ações ou omissões poderiam levar à morte.

O julgamento ocorre desde abril em um tribunal de San Isidro, na região metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Ao longo de quase 45 audiências, mais de cem testemunhas e réus prestaram depoimentos.

Ferrari afirmou que, apesar da extensão do processo, os elementos centrais da acusação permanecem sustentados pelas provas apresentadas durante o julgamento.

Morte após cirurgia

Maradona morreu aos 60 anos, em 25 de novembro de 2020, durante uma internação domiciliar em Tigre, na região metropolitana de Buenos Aires. A causa apontada foi edema pulmonar seguido de parada cardiorrespiratória.

Dias antes, o ex-jogador havia passado por uma cirurgia para tratar um hematoma subdural na cabeça. O procedimento foi considerado bem-sucedido.

Para a Promotoria, porém, o quadro posterior exigia acompanhamento médico adequado e medidas que, segundo a acusação, não foram tomadas.

O promotor Cosme Iribarren afirmou que a morte poderia ter sido evitada e classificou o atendimento como inadequado. Segundo ele, a sequência dos acontecimentos demonstra que o agravamento do estado de saúde não foi tratado de maneira compatível com a gravidade do caso.

Julgamento entra na fase final

A etapa de alegações finais deve continuar pelas próximas duas semanas. Os sete acusados podem receber penas de até 25 anos de prisão caso sejam condenados pelos crimes atribuídos pela Promotoria.

A defesa ainda terá espaço para apresentar seus argumentos antes da decisão judicial.

O processo busca determinar se houve responsabilidade criminal dos profissionais que participaram do atendimento de Maradona e se as condutas adotadas nos últimos dias de vida contribuíram diretamente para a morte do ex-jogador.

The post Promotoria diz que equipe médica deixou Maradona à própria sorte antes da morte appeared first on Diário da Manhã - O Jornal do leitor Inteligente.