❌

Normal view

Remains of “love flower” seeds—a plant that today survives only in a remote corner of Ankara—have been discovered inside a 4,000-year-old Hittite vessel

13 September 2026 at 17:42
The site is called Külhöyük, in the Oyaca neighborhood of Ankara’s Gölbaşı district, about 20 kilometers (12 miles) south of the capital. It’s a tell — the term Near Eastern archaeology uses for an artificial mound built up by layer upon layer of human occupation — roughly 250 by 150 meters (820 by 490 feet) […]

Descubren dentro de una vasija hitita de 4.000 años de antigüedad restos de semillas de la flor del amor, que hoy solo sobrevive en un rincón de Ankara

El yacimiento se llama Külhöyük y está en el barrio de Oyaca, dentro del distrito de Gölbaşı, a poco más de 20 kilómetros al sur del centro de Ankara. Es un montículo artificial —lo que en arqueología de Oriente Próximo se conoce como tell o, en turco, höyük— de unos 250 metros de longitud y […]

Near Where Emperor Diocletian Was Said to Be Born Archaeologists Find a Body Buried Face-Down — A Fate Usually Reserved for Outcasts

13 September 2026 at 16:48
The body has been lying face-down for close to two thousand years. When archaeologists reached tomb 162, on the outskirts of modern Solin, Croatia, they immediately noticed something at odds with the rest of the cemetery: the deceased had not been laid on their back, as Roman custom required, but on their stomach. Around the […]

Coruche coloca ciência e tecnologia ao serviço do futuro da agricultura

13 September 2026 at 16:32

Dia de Campo do InovMilho reuniu investigadores, agricultores, empresas e responsáveis políticos na Estação Experimental António Teixeira. Governo anunciou que os apoios pagos aos agricultores de Coruche passaram de 6,3 milhões de euros, em 2023, para 19,4 milhões em 2025 e revelou estar a preparar um projecto-piloto para reduzir as populações de javalis nas zonas mais afectadas. Ciência…

Source

Vale de Santarém celebra associativismo e identidade histórica

13 September 2026 at 15:19

O Vale de Santarém recebeu este fim de semana, dias 11 e 12 de setembro, a segunda edição do Dia do Associativismo, uma iniciativa que reuniu associações locais e instituições locais, com o objetivo de promover a cooperação entre as diversas entidades da vila. Organizado este ano pela Associação Cultural Vale de Santarém Identidade e Memória (ACVISM), Sociedade Recreativa Operária (S.R.O.

Source

The Pentagon Crisis: Trump Wants Regime Loyalty

13 September 2026 at 13:59
The Pentagon’s extraordinary use of polygraph tests on senior military personnel is not merely a hunt for leakers; it is a warning that loyalty to the president may increasingly matter more than loyalty to the institution, accelerating the ultimate American downfall. When Loyalty Becomes the Test There is nothing inherently unusual about a US administration […]

Administrador do CNEMA leva ao Parlamento Europeu parecer sobre gestão do risco de incêndios

13 September 2026 at 10:26

Luís Mira, secretário-geral da Confederação dos Agricultores de Portugal (CAP) e administrador do CNEMA, em Santarém, vai apresentar no Parlamento Europeu um parecer sobre a gestão integrada dos riscos de incêndios florestais, aprovado em Julho pelo Comité Económico e Social Europeu (CESE). O dirigente português foi nomeado relator do parecer “Abordagem da União Europeia em matéria de gestão…

Source

A Roman Villa Mixed the Pharaohs’ Most Expensive Pigment Into Its Plaster Like Cheap Filler

13 September 2026 at 10:23
Egyptian blue predates the pyramids’ final form. Egyptian artisans were producing it before 3100 BCE, making it, as far as archaeologists know, the first pigment humans ever manufactured synthetically. It’s a compound called cuprorivaite (calcium copper silicate), made by firing silica, lime, copper compounds, and alkaline salts at high temperature until they crystallize into a […]

Novas Regras na VCI: Proibição de Pesados de Mercadorias Entra em Vigor a 15 de Setembro

13 September 2026 at 10:09

A partir do dia 15 de setembro, entram em vigor novas restrições de trânsito na Via de Cintura Interna (VCI), no Porto. A medida visa redistribuir os fluxos de tráfego, reforçar a segurança e diminuir a pressão sobre esta artéria fundamental da Área Metropolitana do Porto, segundo o Decreto-Lei n.º 155-A/2026.

As limitações aplicam-se nos dias úteis, entre as 07h00 e as 21h00, a todos os veículos pesados de mercadorias com peso bruto superior a 3.500 kg, que possuam três ou mais eixos e uma altura igual ou superior a 1,1 metros no primeiro eixo.

Principais Pontos da Nova Medida:

* Período de Restrição: Dias úteis, das 07h00 às 21h00.
* Exceções e Autorizações: Veículos que realizem operações de carga ou descarga nos concelhos do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia podem circular, desde que efetuem um registo prévio e obtenham habilitação na plataforma digital dos respetivos municípios, apresentando o devido documento de transporte.

Serviços Online https://share.google/xK4JKPfyY4fjl7y3j

Balcão Virtual https://share.google/JjA11ky9QxuVQgBrk


* Alternativa Gratuita (CREP): Como alternativa de circulação, a Circular Regional Exterior do Porto (A41/IC24) dispõe de isenção total do pagamento de portagens para este tipo de veículos, aplicável 24 horas por dia, sem necessidade de registo prévio.
* Fiscalização e Sanções: A fiscalização estará a cargo da PSP e da GNR, com acesso em tempo real à plataforma de registos. O incumprimento das regras constitui contraordenação punível segundo o Código da Estrada, sob alçada da ANSR.

Tratando-se de um projeto-piloto, a iniciativa será alvo de uma monitorização contínua para avaliar os impactos na mobilidade da região.

Regulamentos e Formulários
Voltar
Regulamentos
Formulários
Ouvir
Regime de circulação na VCI e isenção de pagamento das taxas de portagem na CREP


A VCI é uma das principais artérias rodoviárias da Área Metropolitana do Porto, mas o elevado volume de tráfego coloca desafios crescentes à mobilidade, à segurança e à sustentabilidade da região.



Para responder a este desafio, está em marcha uma nova solução para redistribuir o tráfego, aliviar a pressão sobre a VCI e potenciar a utilização da CREP, promovendo uma circulação mais fluida e eficiente na rede rodoviária da Área Metropolitana do Porto.



A partir de 15 de setembro, entram em vigor novas regras de circulação para os veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI.



Saiba o que muda, quem é abrangido e quais as alternativas disponíveis.







A Via de Cintura Interna do Porto (VCI), que integra troços das autoestradas A1/IC1, A20/IC23, A28/IC1 e A44/IC23, formando um anel em torno dos núcleos urbanos das cidades do Porto e de Vila Nova de Gaia, é uma das principais infraestruturas rodoviárias da Área Metropolitana do Porto. Todos os dias, milhares de pessoas e veículos utilizam esta via, essencial para a ligação entre o Porto, Vila Nova de Gaia e os principais eixos rodoviários da região e do País.



O elevado volume de tráfego, em particular a circulação de veículos pesados de mercadorias, tem vindo a colocar uma pressão significativa sobre a VCI, com impacto na fluidez da circulação, na segurança rodoviária e na sustentabilidade ambiental.



Uma rede mais equilibrada
A Área Metropolitana do Porto dispõe de outras vias com capacidade disponível que podem contribuir para uma distribuição mais eficiente do tráfego. É o caso da A41/IC24, a Circular Regional Exterior do Porto (CREP), que constitui uma alternativa para a circulação de veículos pesados e permite reforçar a articulação entre os diferentes eixos rodoviários da região.



É neste contexto que o Governo, através do Decreto-Lei n.º 155-A/2026, de 31 de julho, definiu uma solução global para melhorar a gestão dos fluxos de tráfego na Área Metropolitana do Porto.



O objetivo é claro: aliviar a pressão sobre a VCI, promover uma utilização mais equilibrada da rede rodoviária existente e contribuir para uma mobilidade mais segura, eficiente e sustentável.



O que vai mudar?
A partir de 15 de setembro, a circulação de determinados veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI ficará condicionada nos dias úteis, entre as 07h00 e as 21h00.



A medida aplica-se a veículos de mercadorias com peso bruto superior a 3.500 kg, três ou mais eixos e altura igual ou superior a 1,1 metros, medida na vertical do primeiro eixo.



Existem, contudo, exceções. Os veículos abrangidos que tenham como origem ou destino os municípios do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia, para operações de carga ou descarga nesses municípios, poderão circular na VCI, desde que estejam previamente habilitados através da plataforma digital disponibilizada pelos respetivos municípios.



A CREP como alternativa
Para facilitar a redistribuição do tráfego, está também previsto um regime de isenção do pagamento de portagens na CREP para os veículos abrangidos pela medida.



Esta solução permite reforçar a utilização de uma via com capacidade disponível, criando uma alternativa competitiva para o transporte de mercadorias e contribuindo para uma distribuição mais equilibrada dos fluxos de tráfego na região, em especial para o tráfego que pretenda atravessar o Porto através da VCI.



O regime de isenção de portagens na CREP entrou em vigor a 1 de janeiro de 2026.



Uma solução acompanhada de perto
A implementação destas medidas será acompanhada através de monitorização contínua, permitindo avaliar os seus resultados e, sempre que necessário, ajustar ou complementar as soluções adotadas.



Mais do que uma alteração às regras de circulação, esta é uma medida que procura melhorar o funcionamento de toda a rede rodoviária, aproveitando a capacidade instalada da Rede Rodoviária existente, reforçando a mobilidade, a segurança e a sustentabilidade na Área Metropolitana do Porto.



Consulte abaixo toda a informação sobre as novas regras, os veículos abrangidos, as exceções e as alternativas disponíveis.





Perguntas Frequentes


O que vai mudar na VCI?

A partir de 15 de setembro será proibida a circulação a veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI (IC1/IC23), entre as 07h00 e as 21h00, nos dias úteis.



Que veículos são abrangidos pelo regime excecional de proibição de circulação na VCI?

Para este efeito, entende-se por “veículos pesados de mercadorias” os veículos com peso bruto superior a 3500 kg, com três ou mais eixos, e com altura, medida na vertical do primeiro eixo, igual ou superior a 1,1 m, que se destinam ao transporte de mercadorias, por conta própria ou de outrem.



A proibição aplica-se 24 horas por dia?

Não. A proibição aplica-se num período definido do dia útil, das 07h00 às 21h00, concentrando-se nas horas de maior intensidade de tráfego.



Está prevista alguma exceção?

Sim, estão excecionados da proibição, i.e. podem circular a qualquer hora do dia na VCI, os veículos pesados de mercadorias que tenham como origem ou destino os municípios do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia, para efeitos de carga ou descarga de mercadorias, desde que previamente habilitados através de um registo na plataforma digital disponibilizada pelos municípios do Porto e de Vila Nova de Gaia.



Como é que é obtida a habilitação de circulação?

Para que os veículos excecionados possam circular na VCI, dentro do horário em que se aplica a interdição, deve ser previamente obtida a habilitação de circulação, para cada movimento de transporte, através de um registo na plataforma digital disponibilizada pelos municípios do Porto e de Vila Nova de Gaia.



O processo de habilitação inclui, para além do preenchimento de um formulário, a submissão de um documento de transporte, tal como definido na alínea b) do n.º 1 do artigo 2.º do anexo ao Decreto-Lei n.º 147/2003, de 11 de julho.



O documento de transporte deve indicar, pelo menos, o local de carga e descarga da mercadoria, a data e hora em que se inicia o transporte e a matrícula do respetivo veículo e o código de identificação atribuído pela Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira. Nas situações em que o documento de transporte não tenha código de identificação, em virtude de o mesmo não ser legalmente exigido, a habilitação deve prosseguir sem esse código.



Após submissão do formulário e da documentação referida, é gerado um registo pela plataforma, que serve de comprovativo de habilitação para circulação na VCI, registo esse que deve ser apresentado às autoridades policiais competentes para verificação da regularidade da circulação.



A eventual anulação de um pedido de habilitação efetuado na Plataforma deve, de igual modo, ser registada por essa via.



Em caso de dificuldades com a Plataforma quem devo contactar?

Em caso de dificuldades com a Plataforma, contacte:

Linha Porto. — 220 100 220 (dias úteis, das 9 às 19 horas)
suporte.acessovci@portodigital.pt  (endereço destinado exclusivamente ao reporte de anomalias ou problemas técnicos da plataforma)


Que alternativa existe para os veículos pesados de mercadorias?

A alternativa recomendada é a CREP (A41/IC24), Circular Regional Externa da Área Metropolitana do Porto, onde será aplicada a isenção de pagamento de portagens para os veículos abrangidos pela medida.



Como funciona a isenção de portagens na CREP?

Todos os veículos com três ou mais eixos, e altura, medida na vertical do primeiro eixo, igual ou superior a 1,1 m, beneficiam de isenção do pagamento das taxas de portagem na autoestrada A41/IC24.

A isenção aplica-se todos os dias, 24h, não sendo precisa qualquer habilitação.



Como vou saber, na estrada, que existe esta proibição?

Em pleno cumprimento do estabelecido no Regulamento de Sinalização de Trânsito (RST), encontra-se instalada, nas vias de entrada na VCI, sinalização vertical de código (sinal C3d) e painéis adicionais, com a indicação: “Exceto veículos autorizados” e “Dias úteis, das 07h às 21h”. Essa sinalização será complementada com painéis informativos nos principais acessos á VCI e, sempre que se justifique, por marcas rodoviárias no pavimento.



Como será feita a fiscalização?

A fiscalização da circulação na VCI é feita pelas autoridades policiais competentes (PSP e GNR), em articulação com os municípios e demais entidades responsáveis.



Para exercício dos poderes de fiscalização das infrações resultantes do incumprimento das restrições de trânsito estabelecidas, as autoridades policiais têm acesso à Plataforma, em tempo real, para a verificação da regularidade da circulação dos veículos pesados de mercadorias na VCI.



Sem prejuízo, podem os munícios do Porto ou de Vila Nova de Gaia, conforme aplicável, retirar ou invalidar o registo decorrente do processo de habilitação, por identificação de desconformidades entre o preenchimento do formulário e a documentação submetida ou por falsidade ou insuficiência desta última.



A infração ao regime de proibição é punível por Lei?

Sim, a violação do regime de proibição da circulação na VCI constitui uma contraordenação, punível nos termos fixados no n.º 4 do artigo 10.º do Código da Estrada.

A competência para processamento das contraordenações, e respetiva aplicação das coimas e sanções, cabe à ANSR, nos termos previstos no Código da Estrada e, subsidiariamente, no regime geral das contraordenações.



A medida é definitiva?

Trata-se de uma medida que deve ser encarada como um projeto-piloto que será objeto de monitorização contínua, para efeitos de avaliação da sua eficácia e, se necessário, adequação das mesmas através de medidas complementares.

Por: Dino Frazão

13/09/2026



Se gostou do que leu e ainda não é seguidor, siga a nossa página para ver mais conteúdos!

————————————————–
© 2026 Os Monhacas. Todos os direitos reservados.
Este é um projeto independente de criação de conteúdos.
Se gostou do que leu e ainda não é seguidor, siga a nossa página para ver mais conteúdos!
————————————————–

O conteúdo Novas Regras na VCI: Proibição de Pesados de Mercadorias Entra em Vigor a 15 de Setembro aparece primeiro em OS MONHACAS.

An Ironic Ghost in Magdeburg: AfD’s Win, Europe’s Right Lean, and Selective Blame Games

13 September 2026 at 09:59
The AfD’s victory in Saxony-Anhalt reflects Europe’s rightward drift, driven predominantly by domestic causes. Yet the West, ironically glossing over its own playbook and turning a blind eye to its own 20th-century interference in other states’ affairs, predictably pins the blame on Moscow. On September 6, 2026, in the unglamorous eastern German city of Magdeburg, […]

‘Wherever they set foot, blood flows’: Algeria severs diplomatic ties with UAE

13 September 2026 at 09:28

Announcing the severing of diplomatic ties with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on Thursday, September 10, Algeria summoned the Emirati envoy and gave him 48 hours to leave the country.​

“Algeria has exercised a great deal of restraint and a high sense of responsibility,” despite the increasingly “provocative or hostile actions emanating from” the Gulf power, the North African country’s foreign ministry said in a statement.​

“Despite these numerous warnings, the United Arab Emirates continued to persist in these actions, which have reached limits where they can no longer be considered acceptable or tolerable within the framework of relations between two sovereign states, nor remain without a response.”​

Later that day, its defense ministry announced that the UAE’s military and civilian aircraft are banned from using Algerian airspace from Friday. The only exemption is for commercial civilian planes, which can continue to fly over Algeria until the existing contract expires at the end of the year.​

Algeria had already initiated the termination of the air services agreement with the UAE in February, when President Abdelmadjid Tebboune alleged attempted Emirati interference in its elections.​

Multiple Algerian media outlets aligned with the state have reported that the UAE has been supporting the Movement for the Self-Determination of Kabylia (MAK), a separatist group Algeria designated as a terrorist organization in 2021.​

Algeria and the UAE also find themselves on opposing sides on several fronts of international relations.​

Algeria aids Western Sahara’s liberation struggle; UAE backs Moroccan occupation​

The support for the national liberation struggle of Western Sahara, occupied by Morocco immediately after it won independence from Spanish colonialism, has been a central plank of Algeria’s foreign policy.​

In 2021, Algeria severed diplomatic relations with Morocco, accusing it of supporting the MAK in retaliation for Algerian support to the Polisario Front (PF), which is fighting for Western Sahara’s national liberation. But there is no equivalence between the PF and the MAK.​

The MAK, which has long had close links to Israel, largely operates from Europe and is based in France, Algeria’s former colonizer. The PF, on the other hand, is fighting for Western Sahara’s liberation, with its military operating in its liberated territory adjoining Algeria. The UN recognizes the PF as the sole representative of the people of Western Sahara, a country it lists among the last few pending decolonization.​

Read more: Western Sahara’s decolonization at a crossroads after 50 years of occupation​

Despite funding and arming the Moroccan occupation, the US had not officially recognized Morocco’s claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara until December 2020, when Morocco signed the Abraham Accords to normalize diplomatic relations with Israel.​

The first Trump administration, in turn, proclaimed that the US “recognizes Moroccan sovereignty over the entire Western Sahara territory” and went on to open a consulate in Dakhla, a major city in the occupied region.

​The UAE was a step ahead, setting a precedent before the American move by opening its consulate on the occupied land in November 2020, a month before Morocco normalized relations with Israel. The UAE had already normalized relations with Israel that September.

​In contrast, Algeria refuses to normalize relations with Israel until the Palestinians have secured their statehood. Algerian media often refers to the UAE as an “Israeli vassal”.

​“Wherever they set foot, blood flows”

​Algeria’s diplomatic break was foreseeable since at least July, when President Tebboune said in a thinly veiled reference to the UAE in a televised interview, “Wherever they set foot, blood flows… We want them to stay away, so that blood does not flow in our country.” He gave the example of Mali, Libya and Sudan.

​A month later, in August, the UN confirmed that the USD 50 million transferred to the Al Qaeda-affiliated JNIM in the form of ransom helped fuel its attack across Mali. A Reuters investigation identified the UAE as the source of this payment to JNIM. The group has also attacked its neighbors, Burkina Faso and Niger, both of which have followed in Mali’s footsteps by expelling French troops.

​Read more: Mali fights yet another wave of attacks on multiple cities by terror groups

The UAE’s supply of arms and mercenaries to the Libyan warlord General Khalifa Haftar, who has been fighting Libya’s UN-recognized government, is also well-documented in multiple UN reports since 2017.

Tebboune’s reference to “blood” flowing from Emirati interference is best demonstrated in war-torn Sudan, where the UAE is funding and arming the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), whose depopulation campaign in El Fasher had all the “hallmarks of genocide”, according to the UN.

Read more: RSF has burnt and buried tens of thousands of corpses in El Fasher, says Yale report

He added in the July interview that a “diplomatic break” with the UAE “would have happened long ago.” Algeria, he explained, had refrained only to avoid adding to the already existing divisions in the Arabic-speaking world.

When the break finally came on Thursday, the UAE’s foreign ministry said it hoped that it “will be temporary, in a manner that preserves the fraternal ties between the two brotherly peoples.”

In an apparent reference to the absence of explicitly stated reasons in Algeria’s statement, Anwar Gargash, the diplomatic advisor to the UAE’s president, Mohamed bin Zayed, said, “Diplomatic relations are managed through reason, communication, and clarity of interests, not through puzzles and signals that require decoding.”

He went on to preach that “successful diplomacy is built on clarity of positions, sound management of interests and differences.”

Gargash’s statement “is revealing above all for what it carefully conceals. Not a word about the actions of this arsonist, predatory state, which thrives on chaos wherever it sticks its nose in Yemen, Sudan, the DRC, Somaliland, and elsewhere,” retorted former Algerian diplomat, Amar Belani.

Describing the UAE as a “state that has made other nations’ instability its economic model,” Belani concluded his response, saying: “As for the lesson on ‘reason and clarity of interests’, Abu Dhabi would do better to reserve it for its partners in the Abraham Accords, with whom it shares complicity in the face of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of genocide committed against the Palestinian people.” 

This sentiment against the UAE is not limited to the government or the ruling National Liberation Front (FLN), which led Algeria’s liberation struggle against French colonialism and has ruled since, except for a few years in the 1990s.

Mass protests erupted in 2019 against corruption and increasing economic capture by the military elite, strangling an economy already suffering under neoliberal austerity. This movement, known as the Hirak, forced the then president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, a veteran of the FLN, to resign.

But even in these protests against the government and the ruling FLN, “Down with the UAE” and “No to the UAE in the country of martyrs”, were among the popular placards and slogans.

‘Achilles Shield’ marks new step in Greece-Israel military cooperation

13 September 2026 at 09:01

At the end of August, the Greek government signed the “Achilles Shield” agreement – a €3 billion “defense” deal with Israel. Under the terms, Israeli companies including Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) will develop and build anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic systems for Greece.

“This is the largest defense export deal in the history of Israel-Greece relations, and one of the largest in the history of the State of Israel,” the occupation’s Ministry of Defense stated. “Greece’s choice of Israeli technology as the backbone of its most ambitious air defense buildup program in the past decade reflects the depth of trust built between the two countries.”

“Under the deal, Israel will build Greece a comprehensive, multi-layered air defense array, drawing entirely on Israeli-made systems and on the extensive operational experience Israel’s defense establishment has gained during the war.”

The “war” in the statement being the genocide Israeli forces have been conducting in Gaza since October 7, 2023.

An influx of Israeli investments in Greece

According to journalist Vangelis Ilias, the new deal should be contextualized within broader trends of Greek capital and subsequent governments deepening ties with the occupation power.  While the current Mitsotakis administration did not initiate this trend, he says, it deepened it both before and since the genocide in Gaza began. “Over the past 6-7 years, we have witnessed an influx of Israeli investment funds into Greece, both in the real estate sector and through the acquisition of former public – but not exclusively public – companies in various sectors of the economy, one of which is defense.”

Israeli real estate investments in Greece have already had a notable impact on people’s everyday lives, driving up rents and making housing more unaccessible. Endeavors in the defense sector might have been more lowkey, Ilias adds, but they are widespread and expanding under the sight of NATO and European institutions. “In the south of the country, in Kalamata, there is a large Greek Air Force base that also falls under the NATO umbrella as an International Pilot Training Center,” he says, emphasizing the presence of Elbit Systems in the area.

Israeli companies have also purchased local military enterprises, including Intracom Defense, operating in electronic warfare and drone production. “Through this acquisition, the Israeli state-owned company IAI gained access to the European Defense Fund (EDF), an EU mechanism intended exclusively for financing European defense procurement programs – something that was made possible only thanks to the active support of the Greek government,” Ilias adds.

“[Achilles Shield] has been promoted by the domestic media and the elite as an agreement that shields Greece,” he adds. “[Under the claim] that the money being spent, while not going to healthcare and education, or toward supporting the incomes of citizens who are still trying to recover from the years of economic crisis, protects us from those who seek to harm the country, with Turkey always implied in this context,” he explains. 

“In this era of crises, military buildup, and preparations for a full-scale war, they are trying to present this not only as something reasonable but also as something necessary, where strategic agreements between states take precedence over the needs of the people and international law, overlooking genocides or the ethnic cleansing of an entire people.”

The deal’s Achilles’ heel: reliance on Israeli arms

While Greek officials described the deal as a breakthrough for Greek sovereignty, critics have warned of dangers on several fronts. To begin with, in the announced distribution of funds, local industry expects only €750 million of the total €3 billion. The rest goes to Israeli arms companies making the genocide in Gaza technically feasible.

And despite the amount of money being spent, parts of the agreement have been presented inconsistently to the public. “We’re talking about a complex system of sophisticated weapons utilizing artificial intelligence, with a central control unit that operates based on computer code, Ilias emphasizes. “There has been extensive debate over whether this code will belong to Israel or be controlled by Greece. So far, the government’s responses to a barrage of questions from the opposition have been neither reassuring nor consistent. This remains to be clarified.”

The expenditure has been heavily criticized by left movements, including the Communist Party of Greece (KKE), in the context of EU armament taking place at the expense of labor rights and social services. “Costing more than €3 billion, this agreement forms part of the broader ‘2030 Agenda’ arms program serving NATO’s needs, for which our people are paying dearly – tens of billions of euros – at the expense of their rights and needs,” the KKE pointed out.

Like most other EU governments, the Mitsotakis administration has announced harmful labor and social reforms just as it committed billions for Israeli arms producers. This new-old austerity agenda has met widespread resistance. Recently, tens of thousands demonstrated in Thessaloniki demanding dignified wages and pensions, efficient public healthcare, and investments in education. “Not one euro for imperialist wars,” they insisted.

The “Achilles Shield” deal also adds to the case made by academics and activists worldwide that Israel is using the Gaza genocide to market its weapons. This is apparent not only from the purchase list, but from official statements as well. The Israeli Ministry of Defense announced similar deals are part of a broader strategy “to expand defense exports as a central tool for strengthening the IDF’s force buildup, influencing Israel’s foreign policy standing worldwide, and bolstering the Israeli defense industry and economy.”

Critics have argued that Greece’s arms deal risks making the country captive to Israel’s defense industry and alienating it from other countries in the region. “In practice, strategic relations with the murderous state of Israel, together with joint military preparations, are adding fuel to the fire of imperialist rivalries in the region, as well as the conflicts between the bourgeois classes of Turkey and Israel, and of Greece and Turkey, in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, with the peoples being the victims,” the KKE emphasized.

Read more: Amid mass protests in the West, Israel’s military footprint expands in Eastern Europe

“Greece’s ruling class has made a strategic choice to align itself closely with the Western alliance,” Ilias says, referencing events since the Greek Civil War. “It is particularly worth noting that, as a result, the Greek people have borne the brunt of the bloodshed.”

And while the post-Civil War regime attempted to crush “the popular and anti-imperialist movement that existed in the country,” he concludes, they did not succeed. 

“This is partially why we still see today such a stark contrast between the ruling class and the organized, collective reactions of significant segments of the Greek people throughout the country against the genocide perpetrated by the Israeli state against the Palestinian people. These reactions are multifaceted, with segments of the working class – beyond just the youth – actively participating.

One month of De la Espriella’s administration in Colombia

13 September 2026 at 08:54

Abelardo de la Espriella has now been in office for one month. The far-right president won the election by a narrow margin over leftist Iván Cepeda (less than 1% of valid votes), despite allegations of irregularities made by then-President Gustavo Petro.

However, De la Espriella dismissed the allegations of irregularities and began his administration by attempting to demonstrate military strength, an overt religious faith (for which he had to issue a public apology), and a clear alignment with Washington’s political doctrine.

The earthquake and the return to a state policy of war

However, just three days after he took office, a powerful earthquake struck the western part of the country, leaving more than 300 dead and nearly 5,000 injured. The government’s actions drew controversy. His supporters applauded the government’s response, while critics accused the administration of exploiting the tragedy to boost his public image and giving certain countries – such as Israel – priority in search-and-rescue efforts, while denying entry to rescue teams from other countries.

Added to this is the rhetoric of a return to all-out war against subversive armed groups and criminal organizations that De la Espriella already put forward during his election campaign. But this has not been merely a matter of rhetoric. Since taking office, the executive branch has ordered a series of attacks against positions held by these groups, some of which were engaged in peace talks aimed at their demobilization.

In fact, De la Espriella canceled the peace negotiations, which had been resumed by the Petro administration as part of his “total peace” policy.

Read more: President De la Espriella cancels peace talks in Colombia

In addition, the government’s death-defying political communication strategy has caused quite a stir. In some videos, the president can be seen walking among the bodies of alleged “bandits and terrorists” (as the government calls them), which, according to the Executive Branch, number 40, in addition to the capture of nine people allegedly linked to illegal organizations.

But the bombings have also drawn significant domestic criticism. In the Guaviare Department, three minors were reported killed following the bombings ordered by the president, which were part of a series of attacks that left a total of about ten people dead. And while De la Espriella said that armed groups are responsible for the deaths of the minors, he has not been able to escape criticism from human rights organizations that view indiscriminate bombing as a dangerous threat to innocent people and the civilian population.

A return to neoliberalism

Ultimately, the contrast between Petro’s and De la Espriella’s administrations seems so evident that many wonder whether it is precisely this political distancing that serves as the compass guiding the new government – or whether Colombia is, in fact, attempting to establish a new form of state.

To understand this transformation, BreakThrough News spoke with Danilo Urrea, philosopher at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, who sees in this first month a clear shift toward a return to a state policy of war – one that had previously been implemented with negative results: “In Colombia, this was historically known as the era called ‘La Violencia,’ which was one of the worst periods the country has ever experienced in terms of the barbarity it generated.”

“The president presents the killing of people to the country as a success,” he added. “But he also does so with an aesthetic and a semiotics that portray death, murder, and the like as a possibility for the country. And in a context like Colombia’s – where we have the highest death toll on the entire continent, surpassing even the combined death tolls of all the region’s dictatorships – this shows us that it is a step backward in terms of the possibility of building a country based on dialogue and reconciliation.”

Urrea also says the current government is trying to push the idea that the country it has inherited is in a disastrous financial situation, which is why it must promote a radical neoliberal policy: “We’ve identified efforts to promote a supposed economic turnaround for the country through old formulas that have already been tried and proved disastrous for social cohesion, for the territories, and for the relationship between humans and nature – with negative impacts on the communities living in the very places where this return to an extractive economy is once again being proposed.”

Furthermore, he warns that in the short time De la Espriella has been in office, there has been a setback in environmental and labor matters: “He has also come under attack during this first month, as he has begun to dismantle the gains made in terms of wages, recovery, overtime pay, and certain labor protections … which had been restored under President Petro’s administration through reforms and which this administration is now once again rapidly undoing with the stroke of a pen, supposedly to improve economic conditions. That, in very general terms, is what we’re seeing and what’s projected: the deregulation of all social benefits, of all the hard-won gains; the complete dismantling of all reforms; and the surrender of the country – in the areas of health, education, food, and all fundamental rights – to privatization processes primarily for the profit of transnational corporations.”

A new (old) geopolitical doctrine

Following the Petro administration’s attempts to defend the Palestinian people against Israel’s onslaught, as well as its various clashes with Washington’s hemispheric geopolitical agenda, Urrea asserts that Colombia has joined a regional strategy of control orchestrated by Washington: “The rise of the far right, which is well known … Through this administration, Colombia has become yet another outpost of U.S. imperialism’s advance across the region. And obviously, this has far-reaching consequences for the geopolitics of Latin America and the Caribbean in particular.”

WATCH: Colombia’s new president declares ‘colonial allegiance’ to US & Israel

Furthermore, Urrea highlights the historical importance Colombia – a country with access to both the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea – has held in the United States’ geopolitical strategy to control natural resources: “From a geopolitical standpoint, conditions are being created for Colombia to once again become one of the countries that facilitates U.S. military control – but above all, control over the natural resources and assets that are so coveted in this era of challenges for the United States in terms of its economic capacity, its dispute with China, and everything related to critical minerals.”

What is the opposition doing?

Urrea notes that, for now, the opposition parties have not managed to formulate a clear response to De la Espriella’s project. First, he points to a certain caution regarding a state policy that promotes violence and war: “There is obviously a great deal of fear regarding the actions I mentioned earlier – this language of violence, death, and murder. And obviously, in a country like Colombia, this has repercussions for the ability of those opposed to the current regime to act. Furthermore, because there has been an increase in the targeted killings of social leaders in various parts of the country, especially in areas most affected by geopolitical disputes as well as conflicts over economic and commercial control, illegal economies, and so on.”

However, Urrea notes that a coordinated opposition to the popular sectors could emerge, and the people might offer a peaceful and better-coordinated response: “We should consider an opposition that stems more from the popular sector, and there, I believe, there is also fear about how to react in the face of a violent scenario, a dangerous scenario, and manipulation. But I believe that organizations are now focusing on analyzing what the main peaceful and strategic causes might be to address the current situation. It seems to me that one of these fundamental aspects will undoubtedly be, and is already taking shape in the country through popular organization and mobilization, the defense of the environment, the defense of territories that are already being targeted for the control and exploitation of natural resources by transnational corporations, and the issue of fracking.”

Museu Municipal de Olhão promove Jornadas Europeias do Património com música, história e tradição oral

13 September 2026 at 07:00

O Museu Municipal de Olhão assinala as Jornadas Europeias do Património, nos dias 15 e 16 de setembro, com uma programação que convida a conhecer a cidade e a sua história através de diferentes formas de viver e interpretar o património olhanense.

Ao longo destes dois dias, o Museu Municipal abre as portas da cidade, motivando um novo olhar sobre o espaço urbano e reforçando os laços de pertença a uma identidade cultural única, profundamente moldada pelo mar e pela tradição oral.

A programação cruza a história material, a tradição imaterial e a vivência comunitária, através de propostas que levam o património para além das paredes do Museu e o aproximam dos espaços, das memórias e das pessoas que fazem parte da identidade de Olhão.

No dia 15 de setembro, às 21:30, o Largo da Restauração, junto ao Museu Municipal, recebe o concerto do Dúo Kasal, numa noite em que a música e a convivência se juntam à fruição do património no espaço público. Às 22:30, terá lugar uma visita acompanhada à Igreja Matriz de Olhão, proporcionando uma oportunidade para conhecer a arte, a arquitetura e o significado histórico daquele que é o principal monumento religioso da cidade.

No dia 16 de setembro, às 21:00, o Museu recebe um Encontro no Museu, seguindo-se, às 21:30, o percurso pela zona histórica “A Noite das Lendas Encantadas”, com Jorge Alves ao acordeão. A iniciativa propõe uma imersão no imaginário coletivo e nas histórias que integram a tradição oral olhanense, percorrendo lugares e memórias do centro histórico.

Com esta programação, o Museu Municipal de Olhão convida a comunidade e os visitantes a descobrir, escutar e experienciar o património da cidade, valorizando não apenas os seus monumentos e espaços, mas também as histórias, as tradições e as relações que lhes dão significado.

First-Ever Kill Of A Drone Boat By Another Drone Boat Claimed By Ukraine

12 September 2026 at 22:34

The Ukrainian Navy is claiming one of its uncrewed surface vessels (USV) sank a Russian USV, marking the first time one of these weapons, also known as drone boats, destroyed another. The engagement is the latest iteration in the use of combat drone boats, which Ukraine has employed to devastating effect against Russia’s Black Sea Fleet vessels and facilities, forcing the general evacuation of Russian naval assets from occupied Crimea to bases in Russia proper. The use of weaponized USVs is now proliferating around the globe at an increasing rate.

The incident took place somewhere in the Black Sea, said the Ukrainian Navy, which provided no details about when it happened or exactly where. TWZ cannot independently verify this claim; however, we cannot find any evidence of a drone boat killing another drone boat in the past.

“Units of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR) detected the target,” the Ukrainian Navy stated on Telegram. “The Ukrainian Navy’s ‘Sargan 3000’ unmanned boat, equipped with a remotely operated weapon station (RWS) Protector 12.7 mm, successfully destroyed it. This is the first naval battle in history between unmanned boats.”

An 81-second video released by the Ukrainian Navy opens with a view from the Sargan 3000’s onboard camera. It shows the Ukrainian USV acquiring, then engaging the Russian USV with its machine gun. It then cuts to a closer view of the Protector gun system firing at the Russian drone boat. At about the 30-second mark, the view switches to a feed from an aerial platform, though it is unclear if it is piloted or a drone. The video continues with the Sargan 3000 raking the Russian USV with its heavy machine gun until pieces start flying off and it eventually sinks, stern first.

Ukraine's Navy says a Sargan unmanned surface vessel destroyed a Russian unmanned boat with machine-gun fire in the Black Sea, the first-ever battle between unmanned surface vessels. Ukrainian Navy personnel operated in coordination with HUR. #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/Avg4ecz8m6

— NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 (@NOELreports) September 12, 2026

The Sargan 3000 (the name means needlefish in Ukrainian) was first introduced by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in April as a “multi-purpose platform that has undergone testing and entered service with the Ukrainian Navy. These uncrewed vessels are highly maneuverable and capable of carrying out strike missions.”

Though initially designed as a kamikaze weapon, it evolved into a platform for remote-controlled weapons, according to the Russian AmalNews outlet.

“The maritime drone features a specialized low-profile hull with distinctive hydrodynamic lines and is constructed from materials that reduce its radar signature,” the publication explained. “The Sargan-3000 USV is equipped with a waterjet propulsion system (presumably powered by a diesel or hybrid engine to ensure a long operational range).”

AmalNews states that the Sargan 3000 is 6.9 meters (about 22.6 feet) long, 2.2 meters (about 7.2 feet) wide, with an operational radius of up to 1,600 km (about 994 miles) and can carry a payload of 450 kg (about 992 pounds). It travels at an estimated speed range of 40-55 knots.

During operations, the Sargan 3000 connects to Ukraine’s Delta situational awareness system, “enabling the real-time transmission of target data, video feeds, and telemetry to operators,” AmalNews noted. “It features multi-channel control capabilities, including redundant satellite communication terminals (utilizing secure Western commercial networks and NATO military networks).”

It is also equipped with “an autonomous inertial and optical navigation system to ensure operation in the event of GPS jamming, and it incorporates electronic countermeasures (ECM) modules.”

There are several variants of this USV. They include those equipped with machine guns; rockets; FPV drones; an electronic warfare version and one that lays mines, the publication added.

Ukraine’s Sargan-3000 naval drone was presented in an FPV drone carrier variant, additionally fitted with a remote weapon station. The type first appeared in combat conditions in early June, when one washed ashore and detonated in the waters of Romania’s Constanța port. #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/QyKnyJFqUq

— NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 (@NOELreports) July 5, 2026

The Sargan 3000’s Protector remote weapon station is made by Kongsberg.

The drone boat’s first publicly known combat engagement took place in July, when one “destroyed the Russian Federation’s FSB border guard ship Izumrud,” the Ukrainian Navy stated at the time.

“Ukrainian naval sailors sank the border guard ship of the 2nd rank with the Sargan-3000 maritime unmanned complex near Novorossiysk,” the Ukrainian Navy claimed on Facebook. “Among the crew of the ship are dead and wounded.”

It is unclear whether the USV acted as a kamikaze vessel or a weapons platform, although the former is most likely.

“It was Izumrud that on November 25, 2018, participated in the attack on the ships of the Ukrainian Navy in the Kerch Strait,” the service added. “Revenge is inevitable.”

Ukraine's Navy has sunk the Russian FSB Border Guard patrol ship Izumrud near Novorossiysk using the Sargan-3000 unmanned maritime system.

The vessel, a Rank 2 patrol ship, reportedly sustained catastrophic damage, with casualties and injuries among its crew.

The Izumrud was… pic.twitter.com/7VjKDH2ReD

— SPRAVDI — Stratcom Centre (@StratcomCentre) July 14, 2026

One sea drone killing another is a notable development given the damage these systems can inflict and the challenge of locating and destroying them on open waters. Being able to operate on the water over long distances and timeframes, they can be used to hunt down other drone boats, as what appears to have taken place in this engagement, or serve as a picket line of sorts to protect harbors, vessels and other targets that have been attacked by USVs in the past.

The Russian drone boat, which is not identified, did not appear to be armed.

The Houthi rebels of Yemen actually pioneered the operational use of kamikaze USVs years ago. We first reported about this capability in January 2017, when an explosive-laden Houthi USV struck a Saudi frigate. Before that, Iran developed various crude kamikaze USVs and those capabilities soon migrated to its Houthi proxies, which put them to use in the Red Sea for the first time.

Ukraine has led the way in advancements of these systems, first employing them as kamikaze weapons, but then adding machine guns and rockets and later missiles, which were used to shoot down Russian helicopters and jets. Ukraine has also used these to launch FPV and bomber drone attacks as well as deliver uncrewed ground vehicles (UGV) into enemy territory.

You can see that delivery in the following video.

No soldiers. Just machines.

Ukraine has carried out the world's first known combat mission in which a sea drone transported and deployed an armed ground robot behind Russian lines on the occupied Kinburn Spit. pic.twitter.com/zyJdFXWxVb

— Ivan Khomenko (@KhomenkoIv60065) July 13, 2026

In the wake of the Ukrainian success with these weapons, Russia developed its own drone boats, and in August 2025, launched its first attack on a Ukrainian vessel.

The U.S. used drone boats as kamikaze weapons for the first time in July, during an attack “on a submarine and ship maintenance facility in Iran,” U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced on X at the time.

Yesterday, using multiple one-way attack surface drones, CENTCOM forces successfully struck a submarine and ship maintenance facility in Iran. Three Corsair unmanned surface vessels hit the port at Bandar Abbas Naval Base, marking the first time American forces have employed sea… pic.twitter.com/bOM2kmgRxz

— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) July 13, 2026

Regardless, it looks like history was made with this incident in the Black Sea. But this involved a sea drone hunting down and destroying another that couldn’t fight back. Given the rapid pace of weapons development by both sides in the Ukraine war, it seems inevitable that a duel between two armed drones boats could soon follow.

Contact the author: howard@twz.com

The post First-Ever Kill Of A Drone Boat By Another Drone Boat Claimed By Ukraine appeared first on TWZ.

When King David Almost Lost Everything by Loving his Son More than God

12 September 2026 at 22:32

Illustration of King David weeping over the death of his son Absalom who was killed in battle. Image source unknown – appears to be AI generated.

by Brian Shilhavy

Last week I released the Second Edition of my eBook, The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible.

One of the chapters of this book, which can also be read as a single article here, is titled The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible (The title of the book is from this chapter).

In this chapter I show how the “perfect Christian family” does not exist anywhere in the pages of the Bible, as even all the “heroes of the faith” had very difficult and troubled families which today would probably be called “broken families” because they did not meet the standards of today’s Judeo/Christian values for families in Western Culture.

One of those families in the Old Testament that we have quite a bit of text on is the family of King David.

King David fathered many children from many different wives, and one of his children, his son Absalom, completely betrayed him and almost overthrew David from his throne, temporarily taking over the city of Jerusalem.

In the end the people in David’s household who remained loyal to him prevailed, and defeated Absalom in a very bloody battle.

And yet even with this victory, David very nearly lost the entire kingdom, because he idolized Absalom in his heart as his biological son, by loving him more than he loved God.

Death of Absalom by Corrado Giaquinto, 1762. Source.

David’s Failure as a Father and Not Disciplining his Son for Committing Rape had Disastrous Consequences

The story of Absalom’s betrayal against his father and nearly taking over the Kingdom of Israel, starts with one of King David’s other sons who raped the sister of Absalom, and was never punished for it.

The story is recorded in the Bible in 2 Samuel chapter 13.

In the course of time, Amnon son of David fell in love with Tamar, the beautiful sister of Absalom son of David.

Amnon became frustrated to the point of illness on account of his sister Tamar, for she was a virgin, and it seemed impossible for him to do anything to her.

Now Amnon had a friend named Jonadab son of Shimeah, David’s brother. Jonadab was a very shrewd man. He asked Amnon,

“Why do you, the king’s son, look so haggard morning after morning? Won’t you tell me?”

Amnon said to him,

“I’m in love with Tamar, my brother Absalom’s sister.”

“Go to bed and pretend to be ill,” Jonadab said.

“When your father comes to see you, say to him, ‘I would like my sister Tamar to come and give me something to eat. Let her prepare the food in my sight so I may watch her and then eat it from her hand.'”

So Amnon lay down and pretended to be ill.

When the king came to see him, Amnon said to him,

“I would like my sister Tamar to come and make some special bread in my sight, so I may eat from her hand.”

David sent word to Tamar at the palace:

“Go to the house of your brother Amnon and prepare some food for him.”

So Tamar went to the house of her brother Amnon, who was lying down. She took some dough, kneaded it, made the bread in his sight and baked it. Then she took the pan and served him the bread, but he refused to eat.

“Send everyone out of here,” Amnon said.

So everyone left him. Then Amnon said to Tamar,

“Bring the food here into my bedroom so I may eat from your hand.”

And Tamar took the bread she had prepared and brought it to her brother Amnon in his bedroom.

But when she took it to him to eat, he grabbed her and said,

“Come to bed with me, my sister.”

“Don’t, my brother!” she said to him.

“Don’t force me. Such a thing should not be done in Israel! Don’t do this wicked thing. What about me? Where could I get rid of my disgrace?

And what about you? You would be like one of the wicked fools in Israel. Please speak to the king; he will not keep me from being married to you.”

But he refused to listen to her, and since he was stronger than she, he raped her.

Then Amnon hated her with intense hatred. In fact, he hated her more than he had loved her.

Amnon said to her,

“Get up and get out!”

“No!” she said to him.

“Sending me away would be a greater wrong than what you have already done to me.”

But he refused to listen to her. He called his personal servant and said,

“Get this woman out of here and bolt the door after her.”

So his servant put her out and bolted the door after her. She was wearing a richly ornamented robe, for this was the kind of garment the virgin daughters of the king wore.

Tamar put ashes on her head and tore the ornamented robe she was wearing. She put her hand on her head and went away, weeping aloud as she went.

Her brother Absalom said to her,

“Has that Amnon, your brother, been with you? Be quiet now, my sister; he is your brother. Don’t take this thing to heart.”

And Tamar lived in her brother Absalom’s house, a desolate woman.

When King David heard all this, he was furious.

Absalom never said a word to Amnon, either good or bad; he hated Amnon because he had disgraced his sister Tamar. (2 Samuel 13:1-22)

While the text states that King David was “furious” over the rape, no legal action or punishment was apparently ever started as would be required by the Law of Moses for raping a virgin.

David clearly gave preferential treatment to his own biological children that he probably would not have given to non-family members in the Kingdom of Israel.

This allowed the anger and spirit of revenge to foster in Absalom for two years.

Two years later, when Absalom’s sheepshearers were at Baal Hazor near the border of Ephraim, he invited all the king’s sons to come there.

Absalom went to the king and said,

“Your servant has had shearers come. Will the king and his officials please join me?”

“No, my son,” the king replied.

“All of us should not go; we would only be a burden to you.”

Although Absalom urged him, he still refused to go, but gave him his blessing.

Then Absalom said,

“If not, please let my brother Amnon come with us.”

The king asked him, “Why should he go with you?”

But Absalom urged him, so he sent with him Amnon and the rest of the king’s sons.

Absalom ordered his men,

“Listen! When Amnon is in high spirits from drinking wine and I say to you, ‘Strike Amnon down,’ then kill him. Don’t be afraid. Have not I given you this order? Be strong and brave.”

So Absalom’s men did to Amnon what Absalom had ordered.

Then all the king’s sons got up, mounted their mules and fled.

While they were on their way, the report came to David:

“Absalom has struck down all the king’s sons; not one of them is left.”

The king stood up, tore his clothes and lay down on the ground; and all his servants stood by with their clothes torn.

But Jonadab son of Shimeah, David’s brother, said,

“My lord should not think that they killed all the princes; only Amnon is dead. This has been Absalom’s expressed intention ever since the day Amnon raped his sister Tamar. My lord the king should not be concerned about the report that all the king’s sons are dead. Only Amnon is dead.”

(2 Samuel 13:23-33)

Absalom lived as a refugee for three years after this, staying away from his father and Jerusalem.

When he finally came back to Jerusalem, he began his conspiracy to kill his father and take over his throne, by slandering his father and gathering together his enemies.

In the course of time, Absalom provided himself with a chariot and horses and with fifty men to run ahead of him. He would get up early and stand by the side of the road leading to the city gate.

Whenever anyone came with a complaint to be placed before the king for a decision, Absalom would call out to him,

“What town are you from?”

He would answer,

“Your servant is from one of the tribes of Israel.”

Then Absalom would say to him,

“Look, your claims are valid and proper, but there is no representative of the king to hear you.”

And Absalom would add,

“If only I were appointed judge in the land! Then everyone who has a complaint or case could come to me and I would see that he gets justice.”

Also, whenever anyone approached him to bow down before him, Absalom would reach out his hand, take hold of him and kiss him.

Absalom behaved in this way toward all the Israelites who came to the king asking for justice, and so he stole the hearts of the men of Israel.

At the end of four years, Absalom said to the king,

“Let me go to Hebron and fulfill a vow I made to the LORD. While your servant was living at Geshur in Aram, I made this vow: ‘If the LORD takes me back to Jerusalem, I will worship the LORD in Hebron.'”

The king said to him,

“Go in peace.”

So he went to Hebron.

Then Absalom sent secret messengers throughout the tribes of Israel to say,

“As soon as you hear the sound of the trumpets, then say, ‘Absalom is king in Hebron.'”

Two hundred men from Jerusalem had accompanied Absalom. They had been invited as guests and went quite innocently, knowing nothing about the matter.

While Absalom was offering sacrifices, he also sent for Ahithophel the Gilonite, David’s counselor, to come from Giloh, his hometown.

And so the conspiracy gained strength, and Absalom’s following kept on increasing. (2 Samuel 15:1-12)

It is important to note that before all these things happened to King David, God made a Covenant with David, promising him that he would never lack a descendant to sit on his throne and rule Israel. This promise was about the coming Messiah, Jesus Christ, who was a descendant of David.

This is recorded in 2 Samuel chapter 7.

“Now then, tell my servant David, ‘This is what the LORD Almighty says:

I took you from the pasture and from following the flock to be ruler over my people Israel. I have been with you wherever you have gone, and I have cut off all your enemies from before you.

Now I will make your name great, like the names of the greatest men of the earth. And I will provide a place for my people Israel and will plant them so that they can have a home of their own and no longer be disturbed.

Wicked people will not oppress them anymore, as they did at the beginning and have done ever since the time I appointed leaders over my people Israel.

I will also give you rest from all your enemies.

The LORD declares to you that the LORD himself will establish a house for you: When your days are over and you rest with your fathers, I will raise up your offspring to succeed you, who will come from your own body, and I will establish his kingdom.

He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be his father, and he will be my son.

When he does wrong, I will punish him with the rod of men, with floggings inflicted by men. But my love will never be taken away from him, as I took it away from Saul, whom I removed from before you.

Your house and your kingdom will endure forever before me; your throne will be established forever.'” (2 Samuel 7:8-16)

The person from David’s family line that would be next to take the throne was not Absalom. While it is recorded in 2 Samuel 14:27 that Absalom fathered three sons and a daughter, his sons apparently died, according to 2 Samuel 18:

During his lifetime Absalom had taken a pillar and erected it in the King’s Valley as a monument to himself, for he thought, “I have no son to carry on the memory of my name.”

He named the pillar after himself, and it is called Absalom’s Monument to this day. (2 Samuel 18:18)

David’s other son, Solomon, who was born to the woman David originally committed adultery with, Bathsheba, was the one who became the next King after David died. David had also murdered Bathsheba’s first husband, Uriah.

What the Old Testament Scriptures actually teach, therefore, is that God uses imperfect families to accomplish his purpose on earth.

Not only is Bathsheba in the family line of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, so is a non-Israelite, the prostitute of Rahab from Jericho:

A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham: Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram, Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse, and Jesse the father of King David.

David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife… (Matthew 1:1-6)

David and those loyal to him had to flee Jerusalem before they were all murdered by Absalom, and after regrouping their forces, they met with the forces loyal to Absalom in battle, and Absalom himself was killed along with about 20,000 other Israelites.

David mustered the men who were with him and appointed over them commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds. David sent the troops out—a third under the command of Joab, a third under Joab’s brother Abishai son of Zeruiah, and a third under Ittai the Gittite.

The king told the troops,

“I myself will surely march out with you.”

But the men said,

“You must not go out; if we are forced to flee, they won’t care about us. Even if half of us die, they won’t care; but you are worth ten thousand of us. It would be better now for you to give us support from the city.”

The king answered,

“I will do whatever seems best to you.”

So the king stood beside the gate while all the men marched out in units of hundreds and of thousands. The king commanded Joab, Abishai and Ittai,

“Be gentle with the young man Absalom for my sake.”

And all the troops heard the king giving orders concerning Absalom to each of the commanders.

The army marched into the field to fight Israel, and the battle took place in the forest of Ephraim. There the army of Israel was defeated by David’s men, and the casualties that day were great—twenty thousand men.

The battle spread out over the whole countryside, and the forest claimed more lives that day than the sword.

Now Absalom happened to meet David’s men. He was riding his mule, and as the mule went under the thick branches of a large oak, Absalom’s head got caught in the tree.

He was left hanging in midair, while the mule he was riding kept on going. When one of the men saw this, he told Joab,

“I just saw Absalom hanging in an oak tree.”

Joab said to the man who had told him this,

“What! You saw him? Why didn’t you strike him to the ground right there? Then I would have had to give you ten shekels of silver and a warrior’s belt.”

But the man replied,

“Even if a thousand shekels were weighed out into my hands, I would not lift my hand against the king’s son. In our hearing the king commanded you and Abishai and Ittai, ‘Protect the young man Absalom for my sake.’ And if I had put my life in jeopardy—and nothing is hidden from the king—you would have kept your distance from me.”

Joab said,

“I’m not going to wait like this for you.”

So he took three javelins in his hand and plunged them into Absalom’s heart while Absalom was still alive in the oak tree. And ten of Joab’s armor-bearers surrounded Absalom, struck him and killed him.

Then Joab sounded the trumpet, and the troops stopped pursuing Israel, for Joab halted them. They took Absalom, threw him into a big pit in the forest and piled up a large heap of rocks over him.

Meanwhile, all the Israelites fled to their homes. (2 Samuel 18:1-17)

Image source unknown. Appears to be AI generated.

Joab, the head of David’s military, and the only one who was powerful enough to defy the king’s orders, did what he had to do to protect the Kingdom.

He knew full well what David’s response would be, but he also knew full well what the consequences would be if Absalom was allowed to live, so he acted in the best interests of the Kingdom.

What happened next was an event that if David had made the wrong choice, he would have lost everything.

Joab was told,

“The king is weeping and mourning for Absalom.”

And for the whole army the victory that day was turned into mourning, because on that day the troops heard it said,

“The king is grieving for his son.”

The men stole into the city that day as men steal in who are ashamed when they flee from battle. The king covered his face and cried aloud,

“O my son Absalom! O Absalom, my son, my son!”

Then Joab went into the house to the king and said,

“Today you have humiliated all your men, who have just saved your life and the lives of your sons and daughters and the lives of your wives and concubines.

You love those who hate you and hate those who love you. You have made it clear today that the commanders and their men mean nothing to you.

I see that you would be pleased if Absalom were alive today and all of us were dead.

Now go out and encourage your men.

I swear by the LORD that if you don’t go out, not a man will be left with you by nightfall.

This will be worse for you than all the calamities that have come upon you from your youth till now.”

So the king got up and took his seat in the gateway.

When the men were told, “The king is sitting in the gateway,” they all came before him. Meanwhile, the Israelites had fled to their homes. (2 Samuel 19:1-8)

David came within hours of losing everything, simply because he loved his biological son more than he loved God, and the Kingdom of God of which he was appointed King.

If you put your Loyalty to Jesus and the Father Above your Loyalty to Family, the World will Hate You

Loyalty to family members and bloodlines above all else is Satanic and worldly. Jesus made this very clear during his time on earth, stating to the Jews that their bloodlines back to Abraham were meaningless, unless they actually knew God, and recognized that he came from God and was the Messiah.

Jesus also clearly demanded loyalty to him above our loyalty to family members, and he himself was persecuted by his own family members as I have recently written. See:

When Jesus’s Own Family Turned Against Him

As a result of Jesus’s loyalty to his Heavenly Father above his earthly family, the world hated him. And he stated that the world would hate us also if we walked this same path.

If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.

If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own.

As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.

Remember the words I spoke to you: ‘No servant is greater than his master.’

If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. (John 15:18-20)

This principle applies not only to our own biological families, but also to the fake believers in the “Household of God”, or those who claim to be part of “God’s family.”

Being part of a group of believers does not give anyone a “free pass” if they do not know God, and are betraying the faith.

Paul made this very clear in his writings:

It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife.

And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this?

Even though I am not physically present, I am with you in spirit. And I have already passed judgment on the one who did this, just as if I were present.

When you are assembled in the name of our Lord Jesus and I am with you in spirit, and the power of our Lord Jesus is present, hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 5:1-5)

Timothy, my son, I give you this instruction in keeping with the prophecies once made about you, so that by following them you may fight the good fight, holding on to faith and a good conscience.

Some have rejected these and so have shipwrecked their faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme. (1 Timothy 1:18-20)

It is often a very lonely journey as we walk through this life as aliens and pilgrims, knowing that this is not our home, as we reject the ways of the world and then suffer for it, often by being rejected by our own families or so called “believers” and “brothers”.

But it is worth it, knowing where our loyalties lie, just like the true believers who walked that same lonely path before us!

All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance.

And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth.

People who say such things show that they are looking for a country of their own. If they had been thinking of the country they had left, they would have had opportunity to return. Instead, they were longing for a better country—a heavenly one.

Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared a city for them.

I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets, who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies.

Women received back their dead, raised to life again. Others were tortured and refused to be released, so that they might gain a better resurrection. Some faced jeers and flogging, while still others were chained and put in prison.

They were stoned; they were sawed in two; they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated:

The world was not worthy of them.

(Hebrews 11)

Comment on this article at Created4Health.org.

This article was written by Human Superior Intelligence (HSI)

See Also:

Understand the Times We are Currently Living Through

Second Edition of eBook Released: The Concept of the American Christian Family is a Myth and is NOT Found Anywhere in the Bible – by Brian Shilhavy

FREE eBook! Restoring the Foundation of New Testament Faith in Jesus Christ – by Brian Shilhavy

The Brotherhood of Satan vs. The Brotherhood of Jesus Christ

KABBALAH: The Anti-Christ Religion of Satan that Controls the World Today

Exposing the Christian Zionism Cult

The Bewitching of America with the Evil Eye and the Mark of the Beast

Jesus Christ’s Opposition to the Jewish State: Lessons for Today

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”?

The Brain Myth: Your Intellect and Thoughts Originate in Your Heart, Not Your Brain

What is the Condition of Your Heart? The Superiority of the Human Heart over the Human Brain

The Seal and Mark of God is Far More Important than the “Mark of the Beast” – Are You Prepared for What’s Coming?

The Satanic Roots to Modern Medicine – The Image of the Beast?

Medicine: Idolatry in the Twenty First Century – 10-Year-Old Article More Relevant Today than the Day it was Written

Having problems receiving our emails? See:

How to Beat Internet Censorship and Create Your Own Newsfeed

We Are Now on Telegram. Video channels at Bitchute, and Odysee.

If our website is seized and shut down, find us on Telegram, as well as Bitchute and Odysee for further instructions about where to find us.

If you use the TOR Onion browser, here are the links and corresponding URLs to use in the TOR browser to find us on the Dark Web: Health Impact News, Vaccine Impact, Medical Kidnap, Created4Health, CoconutOil.com.

The post When King David Almost Lost Everything by Loving his Son More than God first appeared on Health Impact News.

Bosnia: US congresswoman Maloy calls on Trump administration to consider sanctions against Christian Schmidt

12 September 2026 at 18:28

The political situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina has landed directly on the desk of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Republican Congresswoman Celeste Maloy has sent a letter to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), requesting an urgent review of the actions taken by former High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina Christian Schmidt and the Central Election Commission of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CEC) in the proceedings that led to Milorad Dodik’s removal from office as President of Republika Srpska, writes NewsEurope.

At the time, that removal was also supported by the United States under the Biden administration, although it remains unclear what external influences may have been at play and who actually made the decision. Dodik has long faced strong opposition from Bosnian movements close to the Muslim Brotherhood, in part because of his close ties with Israel.

The letter, dated 31 August 2026, and addressed to OFAC Director Bradley Smith, carries particular political significance because Maloy goes beyond simply asking for clarification. The congresswoman explicitly brings to the Treasury agency’s attention the possibility that the actions attributed to Schmidt and the CEC could fall within the scope of conduct subject to U.S. sanctions authorities.

In the letter, Maloy states that she understands that OFAC has received materials alleging that the actions of Schmidt and the Election Commission may constitute “interference with a democratic process” within the scope of existing U.S. sanctions authorities applicable to the Western Balkans. The congresswoman also makes a particularly significant reference to the Global Magnitsky sanctions program, noting that the alleged conduct could alternatively constitute sanctionable activity under that framework.

In formal terms, therefore, Maloy is directly calling on President Donald Trump’s administration to sanction Schmidt. The letter is addressed to OFAC and requests an expedited review of the materials already submitted to the agency. Politically, however, the significance of the initiative is clear: a Republican member of Congress is asking the U.S. administration to determine whether there are legal grounds for imposing U.S. sanctions on Schmidt and, potentially, on other officials involved. It is the first time such a step has been taken in the context of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Maloy concludes by stating that she appreciates OFAC’s “expeditious review” of the matter and looks forward to learning the results of its investigation. This is therefore more than a simple political statement on Bosnia: it is a request to activate the administrative mechanism that can precede a decision on sanctions.

The initiative stems from the proceedings that ultimately led to Milorad Dodik losing his position. In February 2025, the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina convicted Dodik for failing to comply with decisions of the High Representative. The ruling was subsequently upheld on appeal, resulting in a one-year prison sentence and a six-year ban on serving as President of Republika Srpska.

It is precisely the nature of this political and institutional process that Maloy is now indirectly calling into question. In her letter, she refers to Dodik as the “democratically elected President of Republika Srpska” and presents Schmidt’s actions as the subject of allegations of interference with the democratic process.

The development is politically significant because it reverses the perspective that for years characterized relations between Washington and the Bosnian Serb leadership: this time, it is not the actions of the Republika Srpska authorities that are being scrutinized. Instead, a U.S. government agency is being asked to examine the conduct of the former international High Representative and the institutions involved in the process that led to Dodik’s removal from office.

The decision on how to proceed now rests with the Trump administration.

❌