The drone has become the signature weapon of the Russo-Ukraine war. On any day in Ukraine, tens of thousands of drones are out hunting the battlefield for targets. These could be individual enemy soldiers or vehicles, or they could be larger targets such as depots, headquarters, bridges or power plants. Yet, this drone war has […]
The post When the US slows down Starlink in Ukraine appeared first on Asia Times.
Nearly 48 hours after Ukraine's Starshield terminals started mysteriously malfunctioning, nobody in Washington, nor at SpaceX, has taken responsibility for the apparent decision to hobble Ukrainian military communications.
Starshield terminals — the militarized version of SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet system — began losing connectivity as they
Maxym Marusenko via Reuters Connect
Ukraine's access to military-grade Starlink services appears to have been at least partially restored on Thursday, a day after Kyiv was stunned by sudden speed limits that it said hamstrung some drone operations.
Ukrainian defense ministry sources told Business Insider that Starshield services remained functional while in motion as of roughly 11:45 a.m. local time on Thursday, according to reports that they had received from military units.
The sources said the defense ministry is working to understand how and why there was a disruption to the operation of Starshield, SpaceX's dedicated satellite network for military services.
Yehor Cherniev, the deputy chairman of the Ukrainian parliament's national security, defense, and intelligence committee, told Business Insider that Starshield services had been restored to their pre-disruption capacity.
Ukrainian officials and service members were caught off guard on Wednesday by the unexpected Starshield disruption, which they said restricted speeds above 100 miles per hour. Some units experienced a loss of connection at speeds as low as 45 miles per hour.
The full extent of the service limitation remains unclear.
Yuriy, an officer with Ukraine's National Guard, told Business Insider that his units use Starshield to support drone operations and that speeds were back above 100 miles per hour as of Thursday morning. He asked to be identified only by his first name for security purposes.
However, Yuriy said that several operations were disrupted during the earlier restrictions.
Defense ministry sources said the disruption complicated mid-range strikes, air defense intercepts, and front-line logistics. Starlink does not work inside Russia, so the issue was limited to missions in Ukrainian territory or Russian-occupied territory.
Andriy Dubchak/Frontliner/Getty Images
The sudden Starlink disruption caused widespread confusion and raised questions about the source of the decision and whether it was connected to tensions between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy over Kyiv's targeting of Russian energy facilities.
Ukrainian forces use Starlink, the commercial satellite internet service run by SpaceX, and Starshield, a secure network for military and government work built by the company but operated by the US government. Some Ukrainian officials initially blamed SpaceX for the disruption.
In an X post on Wednesday responding to Ukraine's former defense minister, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk put the issue on the Trump administration, saying that Starshield was "owned and controlled by the American government." He said "any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS."
A senior US official told Business Insider Thursday afternoon that "no such request was ever made by the President."
The Pentagon has not responded to requests for comment.
The outage and impact on front-line operations have called attention to Ukraine's deep dependence on Starlink, which has become critical for battlefield communications and drone warfare.
As Business Insider recently reported, Starlink's rapid expansion has given Musk and SpaceX an enormous source of influence and soft power, and the world's richest man has not been shy about using that power in Ukraine to influence the course of the war.
Musk said in 2023 that he refused a request from Ukraine's military to activate Starlink to assist a Ukrainian assault on the occupied Crimean peninsula. Earlier this year, SpaceX clamped down on Russian forces' use of Starlink terminals in Ukraine, handing Ukraine a key battlefield advantage.
While support for Ukraine has varied, Musk has consistently been a prominent critic of the Ukrainian president. In an X post late on Wednesday, hours after responding to Ukraine's defense minister, he wrote that it was "time for Zelenskyy to go."
The sudden Starlink disruptions came as Ukraine faces growing pressure from the US, with Trump pushing Kyiv to halt its strikes on Russian energy facilities. The US president said on Tuesday that Washington had not cut intelligence sharing with Ukraine, another concern for the country.
Cherniev, the Ukrainian lawmaker, confirmed on Thursday that the US continues to share intelligence with Kyiv.
Meanwhile, Russia has intensified its ballistic missile attacks against Ukraine, firing dozens overnight. Recent attacks have targeted Kyiv and Ukrainian energy facilities.
Tech billionaire Elon Musk wrote on X on 15 October: “And so the slaughter continues … Time for Zelensky to go.” Four days earlier, he had posted that Zelenskyy had gone too far, after US President Donald Trump said it was time for Ukraine to get a new president. Asked by Morgan on 14 October whether he would resign, Zelenskyy said he would not: “It’s my responsibility.”
Musk’s post comes as Washington squeezes Kyiv instead of Moscow: Ukraine’s military satellite links slowed, US missile warnings went missing, and the US threatened to cut intelligence unless Kyiv stops hitting Russian refineries.
Zelenskyy said elections could not be held under constant Russian attack: “From the point of security, you can’t do elections.”
Of any future president, he said: “I’m sure the new man or woman will defend our country.” He also reminded Trump that Crimea and parts of Donbas were already occupied when he took office, under another president, long before the full-scale invasion.
“I’m a realist, and I understand that people are more important than one kilometer or two kilometers. It’s not about kilometers. It’s about land and homes,” he told Morgan.
Zelenskyy has said Ukraine is ready for elections if a full 60-day ceasefire is in place. Numerous sources told The Atlantic that Trump sees Zelenskyy as the main obstacle to a peace deal and related business deals with Russia. One Trump adviser said he is also an obstacle to Trump’s hopes for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Ukrainian forces reported restrictions on Starshield, the SpaceX satellite system they use for battlefield communications and drone operations, and Zelenskyy warned the decision would cost lives. On 14 October, Musk said Starshield is owned and controlled by the US government, which sets its limits, and that commercial Starlink cannot be used for offensive military action. Zelenskyy told the FT he did not know whether the decision was SpaceX’s or the US government’s, adding: “I think it’s about SpaceX.” A senior US official told Axios the Trump administration had nothing to do with the restrictions.
On two consecutive nights, air raid alerts in Kyiv sounded only after Russian ballistic missiles were already approaching or striking the capital. Zelenskyy said Ukraine received no warning from partners of the launches on 12 and 13 October, which hit civilian infrastructure and a major power plant. A Ukrainian official told CNN the loss of intelligence “will give Russians a real leverage on a frontline.” A European official questioned Washington’s explanation that weather caused the gaps in missile warnings. Trump denied halting intelligence sharing.
Washington had warned it could suspend intelligence sharing if Ukraine kept striking Russian refineries, Axios reported. A US official disputed that any explicit threat was made. Sources told CNN the US had also threatened to halt European purchases of US weapons for Ukraine. Zelenskyy told the FT the warning came through military channels.
To lower energy costs before next month’s midterm elections, Trump has pressed Kyiv to stop refinery strikes, CNN reported. Zelenskyy said he felt betrayed after Trump announced a diesel supply deal with Russia. On 14 October in London, he told the FT that Ukraine would resume strikes on Russian oil refineries.
Ukrainian officials contacted the White House, CIA, and Pentagon after the restrictions, which Ukraine says affected both Starlink and Starshield, Axios reported on 14 October. A senior US official told Axios the Trump administration had nothing to do with the restrictions. On the same day, Elon Musk said on X that Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government, and that any speed or usage limits are decided by the US military and ultimately the president.
The restrictions could affect Ukraine’s ability to intercept Russian attack drones and carry out mid-range strikes against Russian forces and military targets in occupied Ukrainian territories. A speed cap of 160 km/h was insufficient to intercept some jet-powered drones, an unnamed Ukrainian official told Axios. Ukrainian officials told Axios they suspect SpaceX imposed the restrictions to pressure Kyiv to accept US President Donald Trump’s demand to stop striking Russian oil refineries, though the motive remains unconfirmed. But Starlink does not work inside Russia, and the drones attacking Russian oil facilities use other communications systems, according to Reuters.
Musk did not directly address the throttling, Axios noted. Starlink, he wrote, “is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX,” limited to civilian or defensive use.
White House officials told the Ukrainians they don’t have control over SpaceX, two sources told Axios. One said the administration would reach out to SpaceX to figure out what happened. The White House did not immediately respond to Axios’s request for comment.
Presidential adviser Serhii Beskrestnov said on 14 October that SpaceX had imposed a 160 km/h limit on Starshield’s “military package” overnight without warning. Ukraine’s 7th Rapid Reaction Corps said mid-range strike drones must reach high speed quickly and that an unstable connection “will make it impossible to launch such aircraft or use them as intended.” One unit on the Huliaipole front had to cancel some missions, the corps told Novynarnia.
Ukrainian officials told Axios the system turned off when drones exceeded 160 km/h, and sometimes 80 km/h, before service was partially restored on 14 October. The Defense Ministry said SpaceX continues to restrict Starlink to 160 km/h and that it remains in communication “with partners and SpaceX regarding stable service conditions and the prevention of sudden restrictions,” Axios reported.
The restrictions followed Trump’s 9 October deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin easing sanctions on Russian diesel. A day later, Trump told reporters: “We said you could do whatever you want to Russia, don’t hit the refineries,” the Kyiv Independent reported.
This live blog is now closed, you can read more of our European news coverage here
Just as the leaders sit down at the big table in Brussels, Romania has said that seven people are still missing after a fire on a vessel in Romanian territorial waters of the Black Sea.
Suspected Russian drones have hit several ships off Romania and neighbouring Bulgaria since last week in a spillover from the Ukraine war, AFP reported.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Olivier Matthys/EPA
© Photograph: Olivier Matthys/EPA
© Photograph: Olivier Matthys/EPA
Ukraine will resume strikes on Russian oil refineries, ending a three-day pause it held at Washington’s request, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told the Financial Times in an interview published on 15 October. Russia kept bombing Ukraine’s energy system throughout the pause, while Kyiv lost US missile warnings and its Starlink service slowed. Zelenskyy said Ukraine would halt energy strikes again only in exchange for more US air defense.
Ukraine's deep-strike campaign targets the Russian oil industry, which fuels Russia's army in Ukraine and earns the export revenue funding the war. Striking the plants that turn Russian crude into fuel, 12 of them hit in September alone, is one of the few levers Kyiv controls on Moscow’s war income. US President Donald Trump has blamed those strikes for higher US fuel prices, which most analysts attribute to the Iran war, and Washington has threatened to withhold intelligence, and reportedly weapons, unless Kyiv gives it up. Each step Washington takes toward Moscow, from fuel waivers to talk of frozen assets, widens the gap Europe and Ukraine must fill, while Russia gains revenue and time to keep striking.
Zelenskyy said he stopped the refinery strikes for three days to meet US wishes, but Russia kept hitting Ukraine’s energy infrastructure and killing civilians. During the pause, Ukraine received no US warnings of ballistic missile launches, he said. Starlink also slowed across the country, hampering front-line operations and mid-range strikes on Russian military targets, he added.
Russia used those days to fire 39 ballistic missiles and more than 120 drones at Ukraine’s grid overnight into 14 October, leaving at least 600,000 people without power. “We hold energy ceasefire from our side,” Zelenskyy told Piers Morgan on 14 October. Of the Starlink slowdown, he added: “I’m sure that they knew what they did.”
Ukraine could again stop hitting Russian energy only if it receives more US interceptors for its Patriot systems, Zelenskyy told the FT. He warned that a halt could simply invite more US-Russia deals that feed Russia’s war machine, and predicted the next one would involve gas.
US intelligence officials had warned Ukraine’s embassy in Washington that a new strike on Russia’s energy facilities would end all intelligence sharing at once, The Washington Post reported, citing a person familiar with the matter. Washington has not fully cut it off, but the threat stands, the person said. Trump said on 13 October that the US was still sharing intelligence.
A senior US official told Axios the administration had nothing to do with the Starlink limits, which Elon Musk had blamed on the US military. The administration is also considering easing sanctions on shadow fleet tankers, which have carried oil from Russia, Iran, and Venezuela, so the blacklisted vessels could haul non-sanctioned cargo, a US official told Reuters. The US Energy Department said the move would not help Russia ship its oil or fuel.
Washington eased sanctions on Russian oil this spring, after which Russia’s oil income jumped $890 million in a week, and it extended that waiver despite telling allies it would not. US envoys also proposed unfreezing part of Russia’s frozen assets to lure Moscow back to talks, an idea European officials rejected, the Financial Times reported.
«L’uomo più ricco del mondo disprezza la beneficenza» scrive L’Economist, che alla questione dedica un approfondimento. Una conclusione condivisibile, se si spulciano i (pochi) documenti disponibili, come hanno fatto il settimanale britannico, e prima ancora il New York Times e Bloomberg.
L’uomo più ricco del mondo, cioè Elon Musk, nonostante ciò, è a capo di una delle più grandi fondazioni benefiche d’America, e quindi del mondo. Per la precisione, la quinta. Secondo i dati più aggiornati, con un patrimonio di 14,7 miliardi di dollari, la Musk Foundation è oggi di poco più piccola della Ford Foundation e il doppio per fondi disponibili della Rockefeller Foundation, ma anche nel 2023, ma anche nel 2023, quando disponeva di “solo” 9,5 miliardi di dollari (il trentacinque per cento in meno rispetto a oggi), era già più grande di altre organizzazioni filantropiche familiari con decenni di storia alle spalle, tra cui la stessa Rockefeller Foundation, la MacArthur Foundation o la Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Musk ha spesso sostenuto che il suo contributo all’umanità non è nelle opere di bene, ma nelle auto elettriche di Tesla che non inquinano, nei satelliti di Starlink che permettono di comunicare più facilmente, nel dibattito politico garantito dal social X. Ritiene la filantropia «una sciocchezza», tempo fa dichiarò al podcast WTF che «è molto difficile donare denaro per fare realmente del bene», e da responsabile di Doge (la commissione per l’efficienza governativa che gli era stata affidata da Donald Trump) ha contribuito pesantemente a smantellare in quattro e quattr’otto UsAid, l’agenzia governativa fondata da John F. Kennedy nel 1961. Più di recente, il padrone di SpaceX non ha avuto remore a commentare con un «purtroppo, sì» la notizia secondo cui MacKenzie Scott, l’ex moglie di Jeff Bezos, ha donato dal 2019 in poi oltre ventisei miliardi di dollari a migliaia di associazioni.
La contraddizione in termini è evidente, ma non tiene conto della legislazione americana in materia di donazioni e dell’uso improprio che ne fa Elon Musk. Come gran parte dei ricchi d’Oltreoceano, pianifica le sue elargizioni in modo da pagare meno tasse, ma in più – a differenza di molti di loro – la grande parte delle somme donate dalla sua fondazione va ad altre organizzazioni in qualche modo legate ai suoi interessi imprenditoriali.
«Le donazioni più ingenti – scrive l’Economist – per circa otto miliardi di dollari in azioni Tesla, sono andate alla sua fondazione nel 2021 e nel 2022, anni in cui ha ceduto quote azionarie per miliardi di dollari e si è trovato a dover pagare maggiori tasse». L’imposta sulle plusvalenze (cioè la differenza del valore iniziale dell’azione e quello al momento della vendita) può essere ammortizzata se parte della somma viene destinata in beneficenza, richiedendo una detrazione fiscale che viene calcolata sul valore di mercato del titolo, non su quello al momento dell’acquisto. Risultato: «Alla fine del 2024, il valore contabile delle azioni detenute dalla Fondazione Musk era di circa 5,7 milioni di dollari, mentre il loro valore di mercato era stimato in quattordici miliardi di dollari».
Qui la capacità interpretativa delle leggi americane si fa ancora più sapiente. In cambio delle agevolazioni fiscali, i filantropi si impegnano a distribuire ogni anno il cinque per cento del patrimonio, per non incorrere in sanzioni ma con una tolleranza di un altro anno in cui recuperare eventuali mancate donazioni. Ecco, secondo il New York Times, la Fondazione Musk ne ha usufruito per quattro anni consecutivi, quelli per cui è disponibile la documentazione: a fine 2024 risulterebbe un debito di quattrocento milioni di dollari.
E non è finita qui. In base alle dichiarazioni fiscali e le stime di Candid Platform, che raccoglie e analizza dati sulle no profit americane, oltre un decimo del miliardo di dollari donato tra il 2020 e il 2024 dalla Musk Foundation sarebbe andato a Fidelity Charitable e Vanguard Charitable che gestiscono i cosiddetti DAF. Che cosa sono? Intermediari che consentono di beneficiare delle agevolazioni fiscali prima ancora che le donazioni siano davvero operative. Insomma, delle scatole cinesi della beneficenza.
Non è facile entrare in contatto con la fondazione, secondo Inside Philantropy non prende in considerazione chi si propone per essere finanziato, «pertanto, attirare la sua attenzione risulta difficile senza un legame personale con un membro della famiglia o senza acquisire visibilità all’interno delle reti in cui già fluiscono le erogazioni della Musk Foundation». Anche perché, al contrario delle altre istituzioni filantropiche che hanno decine di dipendenti, è gestita da un team di sole tre persone, che le dedicano in media due ore a settimana ciascuno: Musk; il capo del suo family office, Jared Birchall e una sua assistente, Matilda Simon.
Quel che si sa è tutto nelle dichiarazioni dei redditi, in particolare in quella del 2024, l’ultima disponibile. Il cinquantotto per cento dei fondi donati, secondo gli esperti consultati da Bloomberg e poi dall’Economist, è stato destinato a The Foundation, un altro ente benefico guidato dallo stesso Birchall, che condivide lo stesso indirizzo della Fondazione Musk e non dispone neppure di un suo sito web. The Foundation si propone di costruire scuole dedicate all’istruzione STEM. Musk ha finanziato una scuola privata chiamata Ad Astra, vicino alla precedente sede di SpaceX in California, con meno di cinquanta alunni, compresi i suoi figli. La scuola è stata poi chiusa, ed è in programma la realizzazione di un nuovo edificio, stavolta in Texas dove SpaceX ha trasferito l’immenso quartier generale.
Una delle donazioni più consistenti, ben cinquantacinque milioni di dollari risale al 2021, ed era destinata a un ospedale pediatrico per la cui raccolta fondi si era speso Jared Isaacman, il miliardario che ha poi finanziato una missione di SpaceX, a cui ha anche partecipato, prima di essere nominato da Trump a capo della Nasa. Donazioni minori hanno riguardato alcune non profit legate alla zona di Boca Chica, in Texas, dove erano precipitati i detriti del razzo Starship SN11 esploso in volo nel 2021, mentre 2,1 milioni di dollari sono finiti allo Scroll Prize, la competizione che si prefigge di decifrare i papiri di Ercolano carbonizzati dall’eruzione del Vesuvio, vinta anche dall’ingegnere Luke Farritor, uno dei cosiddetti “ragazzi del DOGE”. Tutto legale, beninteso, non sempre etico.
Molti più soldi Elon Musk sembra più propenso a voler destinare alle cause politiche. Da luglio a oggi ha dirottato 276 milioni di dollari verso gruppi vicini ai repubblicani, e di questi centocinquantotto milioni al Senate Leadership Fund, il principale super PAC che sostiene i candidati del partito al Senato. Questo fa dell’uomo più ricco del mondo anche il maggior donatore in vista delle elezioni di midterm. La sua attenzione è rivolta alla regolamentazione dell’intelligenza artificiale (era seduto accanto a Trump il 29 settembre in occasione del White House Accord on Super Intelligence) e al sostegno di Ken Paxton in Texas. Qui è arrivato a retribuire tremila attivisti per affiggere volantini casa per casa. Soldi veri, in questo caso. E tanti.
L'articolo Musk è l’uomo più ricco del mondo, e anche il più tirchio proviene da Linkiesta.it.
© BETTY LAURA ZAPATA / POOL/EPA
Login